Talk:Farthest South

1444:

expedition of any consequence; in his search for the Antarctic continent he achieved a 70° southern latitude (69° 52' according to Mill) which was creditable, but not a record. So he is a bit-part player in this particular story, along with Bransfield, Edmund Fanning, Dumont D'Urville, John Davis, etc – some of whom don't even get a mention in this article. All these made significant contributions to Antarctic exploration, but not to the story of farthest south. That is why the Bellinghausen information has to be limited to the outline information such as I have proposed. He's still getting a lot more attention than, say, Bransfield. If you want to merely tinker with the wording, that's fine, but let us have no further expansion.

845:"farthest souths". As to Bellinghausen and Bransfield, they are mentioned only briefly because, important though their land observations were, neither came near to establishing a farthest south. There are many expeditions, before and after the 1911 conquest, that could be mentioned in a general history, but the focus here is narrower. Any attempt to broaden the scope by including or expanding on non-related expeditions would in my view seriously weaken the article. It is open to you to create an article indicating how these "other South Poles" were reached, and should you do so I will read it with interest, but adding the information to this article is not appropriate. 1007:. However, this article mentions a number of explorers whose achievements were very important steps in the exploration of Antarctic region and the South Pole race, even if they didn't reach the record southern latitudes themselves. Bellinghausen was one of the most important of such explorers, his expedition aimed to reach the most Southern latitudes possible, and for that I have reliable sources. I just want to improve the wording on Bellingshausen in this article, and expand it a bit, so that to reflect the significance of his expedition properly. As for the later Soviet expeditions, they are not a part of the main geographic 1858:, an editor is asking if the Milhist tag on this article is appropriate. Skimming, I see: Sir Francis Drake's "principal objective was plunder, not exploration", James Clark Ross's expedition "was a full-scale Royal Naval enterprise", and "US Navy Commander (later Rear-Admiral) Richard E. Byrd and three others completed the first aircraft flight over the South Pole". And of course, the crews, ships and supplies didn't fall out of the sky; most of them would have had military connections. But OTOH, military history isn't the focus of this article, and I don't feel strongly one way or the other. Thoughts? - Dank ( 1197:

you, sorry again, I didn't mean that. It was not my intention to do any "belligerent" comments, and if you got such an impression from my first comment, sorry yet again, for one last time. Also, please, bear in mind that it was not my intention to challenge the status of this article as FA or initiate its review, but to indicate something that is obvious and serious omission in my opinion (seems I have expressed it too strong). Now I see that I shouldn't have started this discussion at all, but just should have added few referenced and relevant lines to the article, which nobody would ever find alien there.

1201:

compromise I have already agreed in my third post that my proposals might take very few space in the article, just several additional lines. And I should say that I find rather unusual your staunch opposition to adding a bit more of less important, but relevant content. I would understand it, if this article was called the "List of Farthest South records", but this is not a list but a comprehensive encyclopedic article, which should cover the main subject and provide links to the main related subjects. I'm sure that most readers will find it useful and natural to have the links to the

2060:, even though that expedition spent little more than a month (February 1874) in Antarctic waters during a four-year voyage that circled the globe and spent far more time in tropical waters. The mention of the Challenger expedition in this article is nice to see, and they did visit a fair number of sub-Antarctic islands, but the years for the Challenger expedition given in this article are: (a) wrong, as they departed England on 21 December 1872; and (b) misleading (if you say that a 4-year expedition 273: 252: 600:

see how that voyage could qualify as "farthest south" when there were already permanent settlements farther south. The only way to justify it would be to claim that "farthest south" really means "farthest south by a white dude". Is Knowledge an international encyclopedia, or is it a white folks' encylopedia for listing the first European to do thigs that Native Americans had already been doing for generations? Knowledge is allegedly supposed to be NPOV. But a lot of it is White POV.

1472:, where I'll place the information from the books I have. Then I may return here and add (with references) the two points to the current wording of this article: 1) Bellingshausen's expedition was prescribed a specific aim to reach as far South as possible 2) Bellingshausen claimed that he had seen the continent (he called it "ice continent", "continent of ice", etc.), but it seems he just wasn't concerned with the question if he was the first to see that land. 362: 341: 372: 21: 1182:

forward by Ruhrfisch to merely restate your own position. You should not, as you did, ungraciously dismiss a compromise that was suggested with a view to addressing your concerns. To say the least, this attitude is unhelpful. As to your comment re Bellinghausen, this excerpt does not need further "fixing" or additional material; the expedition is not central to the farthest south quest and its achievements should be amplified elsewhere.

221: 154: 75: 54: 464: 446: 799:

archipelago, and they could have gone farther south if it was possible. Also, the expedition was the first to circumnavigate Antarctic mostly between the latitudes 60° and 70° (thus surpassing Cook's achievements on most longitudes, though not his main record). As for the other poles, the connection of them with the main Pole, the South Pole, seems obvious, and minimally they deserve mention in

1777: 474: 549:

being at such a location that they could have, if they chose, seen over the south pole and beyond. A trip to Alpha Centauri at some future theoretical date would put travellers trillions of miles further "south" of the Earth's equator... nearly 26 trillion! Of course, any voyage into space is just that, "Farthest from Earth", not "Farthest South" or "Farthest North".

1951:, though that might have more to do with the history of that WikiProject (the WikiProject Antarctica template existed for years, but I'm not sure how widely used it was). The editor who created this talk page (and hence did the initial MILHIST tagging) recently edited for the first time in over a year, so someone could ask them but it might not be great timing. 1893:

That's my view in general, but OTOH, the tag was probably put there and has probably stayed there for a reason, so I don't want to revert in a hurry, I'd like to give this two weeks or so to find out if there's an important connection to military history (aside from the general points I mentioned). -

1878:

be included as Military History; it is a history of the convergence on the South Pole and as such has no military dimension. However, individual expeditions such as James Cook's or Ross's, might be considered as tangentially part of MilHist because by-products of these expeditions, in the spheres of

1488:

Also, I think that it would be nice to expand this article with very few and very brief, tiny histories of other explorers who were known to have an aim to reach the Farthest South, and who achieved something on their way, even if they didn't set the records. But that's just a general wish, I have no

1343:

P.S. I've realised just now that you are a major contributor to this article. This explains your conduct and harsh reaction; but really, my initial posts are neutral, since I was not addressing you specifically. I should congratulate you with a very good work on this article. But also I should remind

1302:

PS As one example of the fallibility of personal knowledge, I was sure that verifiability was one of the five pillars. When I checked the actual source, it is not. That is why we base articles on relaible third-party sources. If there are such that say these other poles are part of the Farthest South

1106:

In a spirit of compromise I have added a couple more lines on Bellinghausen, mentioning his circumnavigations and recording his southerly latitude of 70° in January 1821. I continue to oppose any attempt to include details of the modern Russian expeditions in this article. Apart from their Antarctic

640:

I think that it would be a good idea to split the table into maritime and shore party records. This would have the advantage of making it clearer how the records were established, thus showing the development of Antarctic exploration. If we do decide that this is a good idea, maybe each member of the

599:

Does "farthest south by a European" even meet Knowledge's notability standards? The article includes Magellan's 1521 passage through the straits that now bear his name, while noting that there were people living farther south at the time, and even weasel-wording around that issue. It's really hard to

1869:

I don't know how widely MilHist spreads its net; does the mere fact that an expedition contained military personnel, even though there was no military objective, make it part of military history? If so, how far should this be taken? The British Everest Expedition of 1953 (which, strangely, has no WP

1447:

I think you are quite alone in your insistence that the 20th century Russian expeditions have any meaningful link to the quest for farthest south. If you wish to add See also or External links, or create a navbox, there is no problem with that. However, I think your energies would be better directed

1196:

Sorry, but with such posts you are making this discussion less calm and neutral than it should be. Please avoid such evaluations of other persons and their actions as "ungraciously". I admit though, that to a great extent I should blame myself for this situation. If my comments in some way disturbed

704:

Since the record for Furthest South was set when the pole was reached in 1911, and this was before the Soviet Union was even founded, I am not sure what this article omits. My apologies if I have misunderstood what you mean. If you have reliable sources that detail other Russian or Soviet efforts to

700:

I think you misunderstand the scope and focus of this article - it is not about Antarctic exploaration in general. This article is about efforts to reach the South Pole, and essentially ends with the Amundsen and Scott reaching the pole in 1911 and 1912. There is a brief "Later history" section, but

1467:

OK, this seems reasonable. You are really very good and respectful editor, and I would like that there will be no further misunderstandings between us. You have created a great number of impressive articles related to one of my favorite topics, the polar exploration, and I want to say thanks to you

1324:

As to Greyhood, it is a little rich to start complaining about my "making this discussion less calm and neutral than it should be". Read your own posts. If you begin a thread by belittling careful work, you will be taken to task. That, and the subsequent tone of your posts, is what has soured this

1050:

The article is about getting as far south as possible, which is 90 degrees south by definition. The "Later history" section is six sentences, each of which is about the history of the geographic South Pole (90 S) after it was first reached in 1911/1912; five of the six sentences mention the (south)

879:

No, there is obvious connection. The attempts to reach the other Poles were obviously connected with the attempts to reach the geographic South Pole and may be viewed as a consequence of the South Pole race. I don't propose to add detailed information about these expeditions to the article, but the

548:

It is conceivable that "Farthest South" has been surpassed. In fact, it is highly likely that one or more of the nine Apollo space missions to the Moon (8, and 10-17), in a sense, surpassed "Farthest South" when they flew to the Moon while it was declined south of the Equator along its orbit, thus

2064:

you should at least say they only spent a month in Antarctic waters). The only times they were even in sub-Antarctic waters was: (i) from January to March 1874 when they went south-east from South Africa, east a bit at around 60 degrees South, and then north-east from the ice regions to Australia;

1934:

If it helps, though I don't think long discussions over wikiproject tags are that helpful (ultimately it matters little, as it is the article content that is central), I looked up the history of the tags here, and found that of the four currently at the top (MILHIST, Antarctica, UK, Norway) two of

1443:

It seems to me that your overriding concern is to introduce material relating to Russian Antarctic expeditions to this article. Your problem is that Russian expeditions played little or no part in the history of convergence on the South Pole. Bellinghausen's expedition is the only pre-1912 Russian

1339:

I've already said sorry for the wrong tone of the discussion. I've written these posts in good mood and without intention to belittle anything, I just wanted to indicate the omissions and draw more attention to them. I might not have been careful enough with expressing myself; but I'm not a native

1083:

is long on my to-do list, but it is a different article and a different task. Thanks for reminding me of that, though. As for this article, in the present state it looks incomplete for me; it is like reporting some sport race but speaking only about the people who won it or led it at some point of

840:

There is no "obvious" connection between the Russian expeditions you mention and the history of the convergence on the geographical South Pole which is the subject of this article. The Russian expeditions took place decades after the conquest of the pole and had their own specific objectives; they

656:

Since there is one article about one series of attempts to get further and further south, I think there should just be one table. Would it help to add maritime or shore party to the table somewhere? I guess I look at location and where it says Sea or ice shelf or plateau I know it is maritime or a

1695:

Three clauses out of four in a single sentence of the article. I think that does not count as a major mention. The native boats were flimsy, but they could have reached Cape Horn and the surrounding islands on a good day, maybe even Diego Ramírez at a stretch... although they would have been hard

897:

expedition since Cook to successfully circumnavigate Antarctica, and at much more southern latitudes than Cook. Basically, Bellinghausen was the first to sail through many southern waters, and he established that Antarctica was a continent. In fact, there were few as important achievements in the

1181:

You might do well to show a little more respect towards your fellow-editors. When you wish to add or contribute to an article you should not, as you did, open the discussion with an inaccurate and belligerent comment. You should not, as you did, brush aside the polite and reasonable comments put

1385:

advices, if possible, to add the related subjects to the body of the text if the article is aimed to be good and well-developed. And such related subjects, as representing the Farthest South story in literature and popular culture or adding the information on related developments with the other

1200:

This discussion has shown, and I have admitted it before, that the additions proposed by me are not "central" for the topic, but this doesn't mean that they are unimportant to the topic or non-related to it. I did change my inititial position in the course of this discussion, and in a spirit of

1676:

Magellan, is this: "This was a record Farthest South for a European navigator, though by no means the farthest southern penetration by man, since the position was north of the populated land of Tierra del Fuego, home of the world's most southerly human settlements." I don't think this specific

1212:

As for the Bellingshausen's expedition, your wording is just not accurate enough according to my knowledge, and later I'll try to fix it. Also, I'm going to add at least one line on the fact, that it was an aim of Bellingshausen's expedition to get as far south, as possible, which is obviously

1107:

location they have no link whatever to the farthest south story which effectively ended in 1911-12. The brief "Later history" records the establishment of a permanent scientific base at the Pole, as a brief rounding of the farthest south story. It is not there to summarise later activities.

1428:

First, I accept your apology for the unfortunate beginning to this discussion and for the tone in which you pursued your argument. Perhaps you were driven by an excess of enthusiasm; let us assume that to be the case. If my tone became unnecessarily harsh, then I in turn apologise for that.

1380:

gives an example with a phrase "made a similar achievement" which looks like justifying the addition of similar achievements in the case of this article as well ;) while this is just an example, basically the guideline advices to add the related links according to common sense and editorial

798:

Bellingshausen's expedition deserves a bit more space, and the order of sentences in that paragraph should be reversed to reflect the chronology of events. Bellingshausen and Lazarev sighted the Antarctic mainland several times, basically proving it was either a continent or a very large

884:

South Poles were reached. And I don't think there is any point to create a separate article for that, since an article about reaching all South poles will coincide with this one for some 90%, while the article about reaching all other poles excluding geographic will look strange and

807:

would also greatly improve the article. I do understand that the article is about the race for the South Pole, and there seems to be no other articles on this specific topic, so this article should include at least some information on how and when various South Poles were reached.

888:

As for Bellinghausen's expedition, it really deserves more space, since it was the expedition which discovered the continent where the South Pole is located (unlike Bransfield, Bellingshausen saw the continent several times at different points, and circumnavigated it), since the

1237:) really strikes me as something unnecessary, undeserved and inappropriate. Hope we will return to the normal discussion, without such things. I've tried to resolve the standing misunderstanding in the last post, and hope you understand my intentions more clearly from now on. 942:

Bellinghausen did not reach a new farthest south, and the later Soviet / Russian work on other types of poles were after 1911 and not focused on the geographic South Pole, so I do not see the need to include more material on them in this article. These should be included in

1803:; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Knowledge. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. 771:

A few days before Bransfield's discovery, on 27 January 1820, the Russian captain Fabian von Bellingshausen, in another Antarctic sector, had dimly sighted the coast of what is now known as Dronning Maud Land. He is thus credited as the first person to see the continent's

1751:

You are right: thank you for drawing attention to this point. Although Schouten is not credited with a Farthest South record he did name Cape Horn, and he was the first European to reach the Pacific via the Drake Passage. I have added a short section to this effect.

1943:(March 2011). This is a good example of how wikiproject tagging can be a bit random. It might have been expected that the Antarctica wikiproject tag was the first to be added, but in fact the first version of this talk page has the MILHIST tag: 778:, do you have reliable sources that list the other poles as "Farthest South"s? Finally I note that the South Magnetic Pole is mentioned in the context of an expedition seeking to reach the South Pole, which is the focus of this article. 1393:

additions and fixes, and I've never intended to insert any non-verifiable "personal knowledge" to the article, just a sourced information on the part of Bellingshausen and reasonably related information on other Poles to the

1325:

discussion. Now, since you are claiming that my summary of the achievements of the Bellinghausen expedition is "inaccurate", let us see your information and sources. As to your other concern, I agree with Ruhrfisch, above.

1282:- I do not see the inclusion of these topics under that guidleline. Third, as a possible solution to the links, would some sort of Polar Navbox be one way to add such links? This would be on many articles, not just this one. 1303:

history / tradition, then there is a case for adding them here. If not, then short of a navbox or possible See also links, I do not see any ground for their inclusion, no matter how strong your personal opinions.

2383: 1055:

article and do not see any mention of Russian or Soviet exploration of Antarctica in it (beyond a brief mention of Bellinghausen). Why not add the information there (as I do not see how it fits here)? Thanks,

657:

shore party. I think adding the names of the shore parties would be too much for the table. I did not think to check if they are in the sections on each party - am sure they are in the article for each,

705:

reach the South Pole which are not in the article, please spell them out. Until then, I have removed the WikiProject Russia tag (as one Russian seacaptain seems to be a bit of a stretch for inclusion).

2378: 951:

the other question is "Are the any reliable sources which say Bellinghausen did reach a new Farthest South, or that the Soviet / Russian expeditions were Farthest Souths? Otherwise, this sounds like

1710:

You will need to provide hard, verifiable information on these presumed voyages. What are your reliable, published sources? "Could have reached" and "at a stretch" are not good enough on their own.

1088:

is obviously related to the South Pole race, but the later attempts to achieve the other South Poles are also obviously related to the original South Pole race, since they were inspired by it.

1468:

for that great work. Later I'll try to make a navbox, and perhaps add few of the most important links to the See also. As for Bellingshausen, it is my intention to create an article about the

1162:

is self-obvious and deserve at least a pair of lines. This just adds an important detail to the picture, that the race for South Poles didn't ceased even with the achievement of 90° South.

1011:

story and likely are not to be found in the sources specifically devoted to it. But they are closely linked to it, and have as much right to be included into this article as most of the

568:

This article was very well done. Congrats. However, for future improvement, try to include less images. I think that about sums it up, not much wrong with this article at the moment. --

1970:

Text in article says: "(Shackelton) then marching on to reach their Farthest South point at 88°23'S, a mere 97 nautical miles (180 km; 112 mi) from the pole, on 9 January 1909".

738: 141: 35: 60: 1084:

its duration, and not mentioning the other important participants, nor the closely related races which followed. This is not good for any article. The later history of the

1376:

Thanks, I've already thought about the polar navbox. I'm aware of all the guidelines you have mentioned, and I suggest you to read the guidelines more carefully yourself.

1121:

Really, this is very limited view on the full representation of the subject in this article. As I've already said, minimally the Soviet expeditions deserve mention in the

2413: 428: 418: 2311: 2307: 2293: 2185: 2181: 2167: 1432:

I imagined that you would have checked at the beginning of the discussion that I was the principal editor of the article. Since you have raised the question of

122: 2418: 1870:

article) was led by a serving army officer; does this bring it into the MilHist orbit? I feel fairly neutral about this, but my instinct is to say that the

1344:

you that it is not so easily noticable and evident for everyone that you are the author of the article, when we start discussing it on the talk page. Also,

2428: 2398: 1591: 520: 323: 313: 1340:

speaker of English afterall. Unlike you, however, I didn't went into the personal dimension and didn't discussed anyone personally until you started it.

1165:

As for the additions on Bellingshausen, thanks, but I'll see if I could fix them myself soon since the the wording is not exactly what I have expected.

1783: 2408: 1988:

I think that there is a typographical error: "97" instead of "37" But I am non able to read the original Shacketon's information: can somebody do it?

394: 1904:

My view, is (unsurprisingly) that this article has little to do with military history, but then I dislike boundary stretching at the best of times.

2403: 2153: 526: 1381:

judgement. The relation between different South and North Poles and attempts to achieve them is self-obvious, common sense thing. Furthermore,

2393: 2388: 2143: 289: 1452:

article, which is in poor shape, or working on articles relevant to the modern Russian expeditions, instead of tagging on to this article.

2433: 2373: 940:

Farthest South was the term used to denote the most southerly latitudes reached by explorers before the conquest of the South Pole in 1911.

385: 346: 733:

since they were first who actually saw the Antarctic mainland. Secondly, I believe it is worth mention that the Soviets reached the South

1406:

arguments. Again, the navbox is a very good idea, and if I have time I'll create it later, though I'd welcome if someone else make it.

1539:. Hope you will help expanding it if I have missed something important. It is big, so should be added to articles in collapsed state. 1469: 1449: 607: 1352:. You are not the only person to decide what should be included into this article and what shouldn't, and you should not decide what 2423: 2289:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2279: 2163:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

496: 683:

The article totally lacks information about Russian and Soviet exploration. I wonder how it could be FA class with such omissions.

2269: 1836: 841:

may be important events in the history of modern Antarctic exploration, but they are not relevant here and most particularly are

582: 280: 257: 164: 749:. This is also "farthest south", though by different parameters than latitude. And this is justified also by the fact, that the 194: 190: 186: 182: 178: 174: 170: 2006:

90° - 88°23' = 1°37' = 97' = 97 nautical miles (1' of latitude = 1 nm by definition). Thus the article seems to be correct.

1879:

surveying, meteorology, magnetism etc, may have had some military use. I'll go with any consensus that develops on the issue.

1402:(as much reasonably related, as the later history of the South Pole). So please, let's avoid further misunderstanding and 2354: 2228: 487: 451: 232: 1832: 30: 1973:

This record is reported in other books: for instance, Sir Ranulph Finnies writes the same in his Scott in Antartica

1505:

Thanks - in terms of articles where the other poles could be mentioned or have more, I note that the article on the

2057: 1536: 1594:

that came about in 1801, some 22 years after his death. I don't know how to change it due to the Flagicons etc...

1051:

pole explicitly and the one that does not is about the Amundsen-Scott Base at the pole itself. I have scanned the

2310:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2184:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2154:

https://web.archive.org/web/20080917033900/http://www.ucalgary.ca:80/applied_history/tutor/eurvoya/magellan.html

947:- I see Bellinghausen is mentioned in the lead there - which is a "See also" link here. Since Knowledge follows 1587: 220: 20: 1509:

barely mentions the pole of inaccessibility (map and an external link) and says nothing of the pole of cold.

2345: 2255: 2219: 2135: 2026: 1996: 1156: 893:

of this large government-supported expedition was to reach as far south as possible, since it was the first

734: 2144:

https://web.archive.org/web/20150629181745/http://www.discoveryuk.com/web/discovering-antarctica/timeline/

2108: 2093: 1884: 1757: 1715: 1682: 1630: 1457: 1330: 1233:, your quick turn to the harsh language and discussing the actions of other editors (especially what they 1187: 1112: 850: 611: 53: 2329:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2317: 2203:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2191: 2053: 2045: 1510: 1080: 1052: 944: 726: 626: 377: 238: 40: 2254:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2134:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1209:

section. Hope you'll not be carried away by the wrong course of this discussion and change your mind.

153: 74: 2263: 2157: 2074: 1956: 1919: 1909: 1741: 1701: 1662: 646: 603: 576: 1389:

Also, please read the others' comments more carefully. I've already stated that I want to make some

1650: 1560: 1518: 1308: 1287: 1205:

and other Poles here. It is highly unusual that you resist even the proposal of adding this to the

1061: 960: 880:

brief mention certainly won't do any harm, while it will complete the picture showing when and how

783: 750: 710: 701:

it is only six sentences long, and focuses exclusively on the subsequent history of the South Pole.

662: 622: 554: 2147: 1262:

First, this is a FA and as such is held to the highest standards that Knowledge has. One of these

495:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

393:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

288:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

272: 251: 2280:

https://web.archive.org/web/20080520110730/http://www.mundoandino.com/Chile/Diego-Ramirez-Islands

2065:

and (ii) when they were sailing around the tip of South America two years later in January 1876.

2022: 1992: 1855: 1548: 1498: 1481: 1415: 1382: 1377: 1365: 1279: 1246: 1222: 1174: 1097: 1028: 907: 817: 762: 692: 2314:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2188:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2330: 2270:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110806113651/http://www.win.tue.nl/~engels/discovery/weddell.html

2204: 2104: 2089: 1880: 1787: 1753: 1711: 1678: 1626: 1453: 1326: 1183: 1133:

links, by the way. The links to the closely related subjects are expected in any good article.

1108: 846: 44: 641:

shore party to reach farthest south could be listed (not just the leader, as now). Thoughts?

1979:

90° - 88°23' is 37' Every degree is made by 60 minutes and every minute is 1852 meters long

1947:(two days after the article was started). It wasn't tagged for WikiProject Antarctica until 1616: 1599: 361: 340: 2337: 2211: 2070: 2011: 1952: 1915: 1905: 1737: 1730: 1697: 1658: 1657:

long before Europeans arrived on the scene. But this is barely mentioned in the article.--

730: 642: 2283: 2296:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2273: 2247: 2170:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2127: 2088:

I'm not sure on what basis this is a MILHIST article. Can anyone enlighten me? Thanks.

1895: 1871: 1859: 1808: 1736:

Seems worth a mention as he was the first European to sail through the Drake Passage.--

1556: 1514: 1304: 1283: 1265: 1202: 1126: 1057: 956: 779: 746: 706: 658: 550: 390: 2336:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2210:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2367: 1815: 1654: 1540: 1490: 1473: 1437: 1433: 1407: 1357: 1349: 1238: 1214: 1166: 1089: 1020: 899: 809: 754: 684: 569: 479: 1275: 1146: 952: 948: 775: 742: 1440:. All my concerns have been expressed within the bounds of that policy guideline. 769:

Thanks very much. First off, Bellinghausen is already mentioned in the article: "

2303: 2177: 2030: 2000: 1612: 1595: 1271: 753:

is mentioned in this article and was one of the goals of a number of explorers.

1822: 2302:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2176:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2007: 1776: 1506: 1138: 1130: 469: 367: 285: 1811:

then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)

1403: 463: 445: 158: 1985:

I think that there is a mistake: or in "88°23' S" or in 97 nautical miles

1555:

Thanks so much for making this! I will check it out in more detail later,

1015:

section (references there do not establish the direct connection with the

1003:

I don't claim that any of Russian explorers reached the record geographic

621:- see also: "conquest of the South Pole" - what kind of language is that? 1768:

File:Amundsen Expedition at South Pole.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

725:

Well, firstly I believe that it is crucial to mention the expedition of

2359: 2233: 2112: 2097: 2078: 2015: 1960: 1923: 1899: 1888: 1863: 1840: 1761: 1745: 1719: 1705: 1686: 1666: 1634: 1620: 1603: 1570: 1550: 1528: 1500: 1483: 1461: 1417: 1367: 1334: 1318: 1297: 1248: 1224: 1191: 1176: 1116: 1099: 1071: 1030: 970: 909: 854: 819: 793: 764: 720: 694: 672: 650: 630: 615: 589: 558: 1278:

say, not Greyhood's (or anyone else's) knowledge. Second, please read

492: 938:

The scope of the article is clearly defined by the first sentence:

2264:

http://www.ucalgary.ca/applied_history/tutor/eurvoya/magellan.html

2158:

http://www.ucalgary.ca/applied_history/tutor/eurvoya/magellan.html

2148:

http://www.discoveryuk.com/web/discovering-antarctica/timeline/

1513:

could also mention these and the Soviets in much more detail.

214: 1136:

And I think that the close relation between the geographic

774:" Second, since this is a FA and Knowledge articles follow 2384:

Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once

2258:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

2138:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1821:

If the image has already been deleted you may want to try

1677:

acknowledgment justifies the phrase "barely mentioned".

389:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 2251: 2131: 2041: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1345: 1230: 134: 115: 96: 2284:

http://www.mundoandino.com/Chile/Diego-Ramirez-Islands

2379:

Featured articles that have appeared on the main page

2103:

I've rm tf MILHIST tag, as it doesn't seem relevant.

157:

Facts from this article were featured on Knowledge's

2274:

http://www.win.tue.nl/~engels/discovery/weddell.html

739:

Pole of inaccessibility (Antarctic research station)

491:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 284:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2306:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2180:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1814:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no 1625:Thank you! A nice bit of tidying-up on your part. 525:This article has not yet received a rating on the 59:This article appeared on Knowledge's Main Page as 1489:additional specific proposals on that right now. 2021:umh.... yes, you are right and I'm wrong. Sorry 2069:Hopefully what I've added has cleared that up. 2292:This message was posted before February 2018. 2166:This message was posted before February 2018. 1274:, which means that articles are based on what 8: 1786:, has been nominated for speedy deletion at 1386:Poles, do deserve the place in this article. 43:. Even so, if you can update or improve it, 39:as one of the best articles produced by the 33:; it (or a previous version of it) has been 2048:. This followed up on what I said earlier: 1856:WT:MIL#Nature reserves and military history 1784:File:Amundsen Expedition at South Pole.jpg 1649:The natives of South America, reached the 440: 335: 246: 68: 15: 2246:I have just modified 3 external links on 2126:I have just modified 2 external links on 2052:Another example is the inclusion of the 218: 442: 337: 248: 2414:Mid-importance United Kingdom articles 1829:This notification is provided by a Bot 7: 485:This article is within the scope of 403:Knowledge:WikiProject United Kingdom 383:This article is within the scope of 278:This article is within the scope of 2419:WikiProject United Kingdom articles 1818:then it cannot be uploaded or used. 1586:Surely James Cook was a subject of 406:Template:WikiProject United Kingdom 237:It is of interest to the following 2429:Unknown-importance Norway articles 2399:Top-importance Antarctica articles 1696:pushed to make a return journey.-- 1470:First Russian Antarctic Expedition 1450:Fabian Gottlieb von Bellingshausen 14: 2250:. Please take a moment to review 2130:. Please take a moment to review 2044:I made to the text regarding the 2409:FA-Class United Kingdom articles 1912:) 00:20, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 1775: 636:Maritime and shore party records 472: 462: 444: 370: 360: 339: 298:Knowledge:WikiProject Antarctica 271: 250: 219: 152: 73: 52: 19: 2404:WikiProject Antarctica articles 2262:Corrected formatting/usage for 1782:An image used in this article, 1436:, may I draw your attention to 423:This article has been rated as 318:This article has been rated as 301:Template:WikiProject Antarctica 1966:Problem on Shackleton's record 1079:Adding the information to the 1: 2234:00:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 2079:20:42, 23 December 2011 (UTC) 2031:21:35, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 2016:20:41, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 2001:18:40, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 1961:00:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 1935:them (and one other, Russia, 1924:20:42, 23 December 2011 (UTC) 1900:19:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 1889:18:56, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 1864:00:58, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 499:and see a list of open tasks. 397:and see a list of open tasks. 292:and see a list of open tasks. 2394:FA-Class Antarctica articles 2389:Old requests for peer review 1976:I really don't understand. 1914:Above post edited as noted. 1841:12:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC) 803:section, while few lines in 679:Russian and Soviet explorers 544:Further than Farthest South? 505:Knowledge:WikiProject Norway 2434:WikiProject Norway articles 2374:Knowledge featured articles 2062:"explored Antarctic waters" 1762:16:41, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 1746:13:55, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 1720:19:03, 30 August 2011 (UTC) 1706:14:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC) 1687:17:48, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 1667:13:53, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 1635:17:04, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 1621:12:46, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 1604:09:40, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 673:20:10, 7 October 2010 (UTC) 651:16:59, 7 October 2010 (UTC) 631:02:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC) 616:19:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC) 508:Template:WikiProject Norway 2450: 2323:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2243:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2197:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2123:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2058:Template:Polar exploration 1982:37 x 1852 = 68.524 meters 1823:Commons Undeletion Request 1790:for the following reason: 1571:02:31, 16 March 2011 (UTC) 1551:01:40, 16 March 2011 (UTC) 1537:Template:Polar exploration 1529:03:10, 12 March 2011 (UTC) 1501:02:02, 12 March 2011 (UTC) 1484:02:02, 12 March 2011 (UTC) 1462:01:04, 12 March 2011 (UTC) 1418:15:35, 11 March 2011 (UTC) 1368:15:35, 11 March 2011 (UTC) 1335:15:08, 11 March 2011 (UTC) 1319:13:37, 11 March 2011 (UTC) 1298:13:32, 11 March 2011 (UTC) 1249:13:03, 11 March 2011 (UTC) 1225:12:35, 11 March 2011 (UTC) 1192:11:20, 11 March 2011 (UTC) 1177:00:41, 11 March 2011 (UTC) 1117:17:00, 10 March 2011 (UTC) 1100:00:41, 11 March 2011 (UTC) 1072:16:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC) 1031:15:30, 10 March 2011 (UTC) 971:14:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC) 910:13:51, 10 March 2011 (UTC) 855:11:15, 10 March 2011 (UTC) 527:project's importance scale 429:project's importance scale 386:WikiProject United Kingdom 324:project's importance scale 142:Featured article candidate 1438:Ownership and stewardship 1213:relevant to the subject. 820:16:41, 8 March 2011 (UTC) 794:15:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC) 765:15:34, 8 March 2011 (UTC) 721:00:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC) 695:00:03, 7 March 2011 (UTC) 590:21:00, 31 July 2008 (UTC) 524: 457: 422: 355: 317: 266: 245: 201: 151: 71: 67: 2424:FA-Class Norway articles 2360:04:58, 20 May 2017 (UTC) 2113:09:00, 2 June 2012 (UTC) 2098:05:13, 24 May 2012 (UTC) 1125:section, as well as the 61:Today's featured article 2239:External links modified 2119:External links modified 1672:What the article says, 735:Pole of Inaccessibility 559:04:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 409:United Kingdom articles 2067: 1965: 1833:CommonsNotificationBot 898:Farthest South story. 281:WikiProject Antarctica 227:This article is rated 2054:Challenger expedition 2050: 2046:Challenger expedition 1511:History of Antarctica 1081:History of Antarctica 1053:History of Antarctica 945:History of Antarctica 727:Faddey Bellingshausen 378:United Kingdom portal 2304:regular verification 2178:regular verification 1937:subsequently removed 1792:Copyright violations 1535:Here is the navbox: 104:Good article nominee 2294:After February 2018 2168:After February 2018 1651:54th parallel south 1354:must not be allowed 1348:is a clear sign of 751:South Magnetic Pole 304:Antarctica articles 63:on August 24, 2011. 41:Knowledge community 2348:InternetArchiveBot 2299:InternetArchiveBot 2222:InternetArchiveBot 2173:InternetArchiveBot 1816:fair use rationale 1356:to other editors. 1160:of inaccessibility 488:WikiProject Norway 233:content assessment 79:Article milestones 2324: 2198: 1926: 1847: 1846: 1796:What should I do? 1788:Wikimedia Commons 1567: 1525: 1448:to improving the 1346:that your comment 1315: 1294: 1068: 967: 953:original research 790: 717: 669: 606:comment added by 595:... by a European 541: 540: 537: 536: 533: 532: 439: 438: 435: 434: 334: 333: 330: 329: 213: 212: 209: 208: 2441: 2358: 2349: 2322: 2321: 2300: 2232: 2223: 2196: 2195: 2174: 2084:MILHIST article? 2040:Noting here the 1939:) were added in 1913: 1807:If the image is 1779: 1772: 1771: 1590:rather than the 1565: 1546: 1543: 1523: 1496: 1493: 1479: 1476: 1413: 1410: 1363: 1360: 1313: 1292: 1276:reliable sources 1264:(and one of the 1244: 1241: 1220: 1217: 1172: 1169: 1095: 1092: 1066: 1026: 1023: 965: 949:reliable sources 905: 902: 815: 812: 788: 776:relaible sources 760: 757: 741:, and the South 715: 690: 687: 667: 618: 587: 580: 574: 513: 512: 509: 506: 503: 482: 477: 476: 475: 466: 459: 458: 448: 441: 411: 410: 407: 404: 401: 380: 375: 374: 373: 364: 357: 356: 351: 343: 336: 306: 305: 302: 299: 296: 275: 268: 267: 262: 254: 247: 230: 224: 223: 215: 204:Featured article 202:Current status: 156: 137: 118: 99: 78: 77: 69: 56: 31:featured article 23: 16: 2449: 2448: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2364: 2363: 2352: 2347: 2315: 2308:have permission 2298: 2256:this simple FaQ 2241: 2226: 2221: 2189: 2182:have permission 2172: 2136:this simple FaQ 2121: 2086: 2038: 1968: 1874:article should 1852: 1770: 1734: 1731:Willem Schouten 1647: 1584: 1564: 1544: 1541: 1522: 1494: 1491: 1477: 1474: 1426: 1411: 1408: 1361: 1358: 1312: 1291: 1242: 1239: 1218: 1215: 1170: 1167: 1093: 1090: 1065: 1024: 1021: 964: 903: 900: 813: 810: 787: 758: 755: 731:Mikhail Lazarev 714: 688: 685: 681: 666: 638: 601: 597: 583: 577: 570: 566: 546: 511:Norway articles 510: 507: 504: 501: 500: 478: 473: 471: 408: 405: 402: 399: 398: 376: 371: 369: 349: 303: 300: 297: 294: 293: 260: 231:on Knowledge's 228: 195:January 9, 2021 191:January 9, 2020 187:January 9, 2018 183:January 9, 2017 179:January 9, 2016 175:January 9, 2014 171:January 9, 2011 135:October 4, 2008 133: 114: 95: 72: 12: 11: 5: 2447: 2445: 2437: 2436: 2431: 2426: 2421: 2416: 2411: 2406: 2401: 2396: 2391: 2386: 2381: 2376: 2366: 2365: 2342: 2341: 2334: 2287: 2286: 2278:Added archive 2276: 2268:Added archive 2266: 2248:Farthest South 2240: 2237: 2216: 2215: 2208: 2161: 2160: 2152:Added archive 2150: 2142:Added archive 2128:Farthest South 2120: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2085: 2082: 2037: 2036:HMS Challenger 2034: 2019: 2018: 1967: 1964: 1949:21 August 2010 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1872:Farthest South 1851: 1848: 1845: 1844: 1826: 1825: 1819: 1812: 1798: 1797: 1780: 1769: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1733: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1690: 1689: 1646: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1592:United Kingdom 1583: 1582:United Kingdom 1580: 1578: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1561: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1519: 1486: 1425: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1387: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1309: 1288: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1210: 1203:Farthest North 1198: 1163: 1134: 1127:Farthest North 1104: 1103: 1102: 1062: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1017:Farthest South 1009:Farthest South 1005:Farthest South 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 973: 961: 923: 922: 921: 920: 919: 918: 917: 916: 915: 914: 913: 912: 886: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 784: 747:Vostok Station 711: 702: 680: 677: 676: 675: 663: 637: 634: 596: 593: 565: 562: 545: 542: 539: 538: 535: 534: 531: 530: 523: 517: 516: 514: 497:the discussion 484: 483: 467: 455: 454: 449: 437: 436: 433: 432: 425:Mid-importance 421: 415: 414: 412: 400:United Kingdom 395:the discussion 391:United Kingdom 382: 381: 365: 353: 352: 350:Mid‑importance 347:United Kingdom 344: 332: 331: 328: 327: 320:Top-importance 316: 310: 309: 307: 290:the discussion 276: 264: 263: 261:Top‑importance 255: 243: 242: 236: 225: 211: 210: 207: 206: 199: 198: 165:On this day... 149: 148: 145: 138: 130: 129: 126: 119: 116:August 6, 2008 111: 110: 107: 100: 92: 91: 88: 85: 81: 80: 65: 64: 57: 49: 48: 27:Farthest South 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2446: 2435: 2432: 2430: 2427: 2425: 2422: 2420: 2417: 2415: 2412: 2410: 2407: 2405: 2402: 2400: 2397: 2395: 2392: 2390: 2387: 2385: 2382: 2380: 2377: 2375: 2372: 2371: 2369: 2362: 2361: 2356: 2351: 2350: 2339: 2335: 2332: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2319: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2295: 2290: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2265: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2244: 2238: 2236: 2235: 2230: 2225: 2224: 2213: 2209: 2206: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2193: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2169: 2164: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2124: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2083: 2081: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2066: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2049: 2047: 2043: 2035: 2033: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2023:Martinosacchi 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1993:Martinosacchi 1989: 1986: 1983: 1980: 1977: 1974: 1971: 1963: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1945:12 March 2008 1942: 1938: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1897: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1877: 1873: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1849: 1843: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1824: 1820: 1817: 1813: 1810: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1802: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1778: 1774: 1773: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1732: 1729: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1675: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1655:Drake Passage 1652: 1644: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1588:Great Britain 1581: 1579: 1572: 1569: 1568: 1558: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1549: 1547: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1527: 1526: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1499: 1497: 1487: 1485: 1482: 1480: 1471: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1445: 1441: 1439: 1435: 1430: 1423: 1419: 1416: 1414: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1396:Later history 1392: 1388: 1384: 1379: 1375: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1342: 1341: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1317: 1316: 1306: 1300: 1299: 1296: 1295: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1272:verifiability 1269: 1267: 1250: 1247: 1245: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1223: 1221: 1211: 1208: 1204: 1199: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1175: 1173: 1164: 1161: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1140: 1135: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1105: 1101: 1098: 1096: 1087: 1082: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1070: 1069: 1059: 1054: 1032: 1029: 1027: 1018: 1014: 1013:Later history 1010: 1006: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 972: 969: 968: 958: 954: 950: 946: 941: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 924: 911: 908: 906: 896: 892: 887: 883: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 856: 852: 848: 844: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 821: 818: 816: 806: 805:Later history 802: 797: 796: 795: 792: 791: 781: 777: 773: 768: 767: 766: 763: 761: 752: 748: 744: 740: 736: 732: 728: 724: 723: 722: 719: 718: 708: 703: 699: 698: 697: 696: 693: 691: 678: 674: 671: 670: 660: 655: 654: 653: 652: 648: 644: 635: 633: 632: 628: 624: 619: 617: 613: 609: 605: 594: 592: 591: 588: 586: 581: 579: 575: 573: 563: 561: 560: 556: 552: 543: 528: 522: 519: 518: 515: 498: 494: 490: 489: 481: 480:Norway portal 470: 468: 465: 461: 460: 456: 453: 450: 447: 443: 430: 426: 420: 417: 416: 413: 396: 392: 388: 387: 379: 368: 366: 363: 359: 358: 354: 348: 345: 342: 338: 325: 321: 315: 312: 311: 308: 291: 287: 283: 282: 277: 274: 270: 269: 265: 259: 256: 253: 249: 244: 240: 234: 226: 222: 217: 216: 205: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 168: 166: 160: 155: 150: 146: 144: 143: 139: 136: 132: 131: 127: 125: 124: 120: 117: 113: 112: 108: 106: 105: 101: 98: 97:July 31, 2008 94: 93: 89: 86: 83: 82: 76: 70: 66: 62: 58: 55: 51: 50: 46: 42: 38: 37: 32: 28: 25: 22: 18: 17: 2346: 2343: 2318:source check 2297: 2291: 2288: 2245: 2242: 2220: 2217: 2192:source check 2171: 2165: 2162: 2125: 2122: 2105:Peacemaker67 2090:Peacemaker67 2087: 2068: 2061: 2051: 2039: 2020: 1990: 1987: 1984: 1981: 1978: 1975: 1972: 1969: 1933: 1896:push to talk 1881:Brianboulton 1875: 1860:push to talk 1853: 1828: 1827: 1800: 1799: 1791: 1754:Brianboulton 1735: 1712:Brianboulton 1679:Brianboulton 1673: 1648: 1627:Brianboulton 1585: 1577: 1559: 1517: 1454:Brianboulton 1446: 1442: 1431: 1427: 1399: 1395: 1390: 1353: 1327:Brianboulton 1307: 1301: 1286: 1266:five pillars 1263: 1261: 1234: 1231:this comment 1229:P.S. As for 1206: 1184:Brianboulton 1157: 1153: 1147: 1143: 1137: 1122: 1109:Brianboulton 1085: 1060: 1049: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 959: 939: 894: 890: 881: 847:Brianboulton 842: 804: 800: 782: 770: 743:Pole of Cold 709: 682: 661: 639: 620: 608:139.68.134.1 598: 584: 578: 571: 567: 547: 486: 424: 384: 319: 279: 239:WikiProjects 203: 162: 140: 121: 103: 102: 45:please do so 34: 26: 1801:Don't panic 1645:Amerindians 1383:WP:See also 1378:WP:See also 1280:WP:See also 885:incomplete. 602:—Preceding 123:Peer review 2368:Categories 2355:Report bug 2229:Report bug 2071:Carcharoth 1953:Carcharoth 1916:Carcharoth 1906:Carcharoth 1738:MacRusgail 1698:MacRusgail 1659:MacRusgail 1507:South Pole 1424:New thread 1391:referenced 1142:, and the 1139:South Pole 1131:North Pole 1086:South Pole 895:scientific 643:Catiline63 295:Antarctica 286:Antarctica 258:Antarctica 169:column on 36:identified 2338:this tool 2331:this tool 2212:this tool 2205:this tool 1941:this edit 1563:<: --> 1557:Ruhrfisch 1521:<: --> 1515:Ruhrfisch 1404:straw man 1311:<: --> 1305:Ruhrfisch 1290:<: --> 1284:Ruhrfisch 1064:<: --> 1058:Ruhrfisch 963:<: --> 957:Ruhrfisch 786:<: --> 780:Ruhrfisch 772:mainland. 713:<: --> 707:Ruhrfisch 665:<: --> 659:Ruhrfisch 564:Ga Review 159:Main Page 2344:Cheers.— 2218:Cheers.— 1991:Martino 1850:Milhist? 1809:non-free 1674:a propos 1653:and the 1611:Changed 1400:See also 1235:must not 1207:See also 1129:and the 1123:See also 801:See also 623:LNucleus 604:unsigned 572:Meldshal 229:FA-class 147:Promoted 128:Reviewed 2252:my edit 2132:my edit 2042:changes 1152:and the 1150:of Cold 1019:term). 891:purpose 737:at the 427:on the 322:on the 161:in the 87:Process 1894:Dank ( 1613:Petsco 1596:Petsco 1434:WP:OWN 1350:WP:OWN 1154:South 502:Norway 493:Norway 452:Norway 235:scale. 193:, and 109:Listed 90:Result 2008:Apcbg 1562:: --> 1520:: --> 1310:: --> 1289:: --> 1144:South 1063:: --> 962:: --> 785:: --> 712:: --> 664:: --> 29:is a 2109:talk 2094:talk 2075:talk 2027:talk 2012:talk 1997:talk 1957:talk 1920:talk 1910:talk 1885:talk 1837:talk 1758:talk 1742:talk 1716:talk 1702:talk 1683:talk 1663:talk 1631:talk 1617:talk 1600:talk 1545:Hood 1542:Grey 1495:Hood 1492:Grey 1478:Hood 1475:Grey 1458:talk 1412:Hood 1409:Grey 1362:Hood 1359:Grey 1331:talk 1243:Hood 1240:Grey 1219:Hood 1216:Grey 1188:talk 1171:Hood 1168:Grey 1158:Pole 1148:Pole 1113:talk 1094:Hood 1091:Grey 1025:Hood 1022:Grey 904:Hood 901:Grey 851:talk 814:Hood 811:Grey 759:Hood 756:Grey 729:and 689:Hood 686:Grey 647:talk 627:talk 612:talk 555:talk 84:Date 2312:RfC 2282:to 2272:to 2186:RfC 2156:to 2146:to 2056:in 1876:not 1854:At 1398:or 1270:is 882:all 843:not 745:at 585:{C} 551:GBC 521:??? 419:Mid 314:Top 2370:: 2325:. 2320:}} 2316:{{ 2199:. 2194:}} 2190:{{ 2111:) 2096:) 2077:) 2029:) 2014:) 1999:) 1959:) 1922:) 1898:) 1887:) 1862:) 1839:) 1831:-- 1760:) 1744:) 1718:) 1704:) 1685:) 1665:) 1633:) 1619:) 1602:) 1460:) 1333:) 1190:) 1115:) 955:. 853:) 649:) 629:) 614:) 557:) 189:, 185:, 181:, 177:, 173:, 2357:) 2353:( 2340:. 2333:. 2231:) 2227:( 2214:. 2207:. 2107:( 2092:( 2073:( 2025:( 2010:( 1995:( 1955:( 1918:( 1908:( 1883:( 1835:( 1756:( 1740:( 1714:( 1700:( 1681:( 1661:( 1629:( 1615:( 1598:( 1566:° 1524:° 1456:( 1329:( 1314:° 1293:° 1268:) 1186:( 1111:( 1067:° 966:° 849:( 789:° 716:° 668:° 645:( 625:( 610:( 553:( 529:. 431:. 326:. 241:: 197:. 167:" 163:" 47:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index