Knowledge

Talk:Femininity/Archive of common concerns

Source đź“ť

30:
page rather than repeatedly type out the same arguments over and over again. This archive page unlike other archive pages can be added to and edited by any editor. That being said it is on the watchlist of several editors and if you are unable to come to a consensus with the other editors about the wording of a given concern or objection you should quickly just create a branch version of that concern or objection.
29:
This page is a depository of some of the common concerns and objections that need to keep being stated when changes are made to the femininity article. It has been created so that editors of the femininity article can just copy and paste one of the below concerns and objections into the actual talk
85:
It was argued that the use of the phrase “socially constructed”, without the reference to “biologically-created factors” did not take into account the views of a those in the scientific community who hold that biology plays a partial role in determining what we consider feminine behavour. Refer to
52:
Because the subject of femininity is so contentious, the lede of this article seems to be subject to more change than the ledes of other articles. Consensus for the present lede of this page has been achieved through the work of several editors over many days. (This presently does not include the
106:
cultural and biological factors play a role. Your only recourse would be to insist that the lede take no position on the matter at all. Given my experience you may be able to find active editors who would support you in that position and thus you may be able to reach a consensus to do so.
156:
requires that sources provide the foundation for all material in an article. We cannot rely on the judgement of an editor to claim that a particular photo or piece of art is representative of femininity. If a claim is made in the caption of an image it must have an appropriate reference.
64:
Of course it goes without saying that you are still more than welcome to contest anything in the lede, I just wanted to make sure that you were aware of its history as I’ve checked your contributions and you seem to be a new editor of this article.
53:
lede image) In some cases the exact wording of a given sentence in the lede has been chosen to appease all concerned. Here are some links to some of these discussions:
79:
I just want to point out, in case you were not aware of it, that the consensus for the exact wording of sentence you have just edited was achieved only after a
83:
took place. You of course are free to object to it, but I just wish to quickly cite the broad strokes of the discussion that is relevant to your edit.
87: 58: 54: 153: 26:
The views on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of all the editors of the femininity page.
184: 94:
object to the lede because it suggests to the reader that it is an accepted fact that both cultural
76:
The below is only guaranteed to be the opinion of one editor, although other editors may share it.
49:
The below is only guaranteed to be the opinion of one editor, although other editors may share it.
180: 98:
biological factors play a role in femininity, the solution is not to have the lede suggest that
80: 34: 17: 176: 135:
An edit that contains two separate edits that would be best dealt with one at a time
119:
An edit that is far to extensive to allow without having reached a consensus first
102:
cultural factors play a role. For that is objectionable to those who hold that
127:
An edit that had no edit summary explaining the reason for the edit
72:
Removal of “biologically-created” from Social construction sentence
33:
This page's creation was discussed on the femininity talk page.
111:
Removal of the line which gave examples of feminine attributes
90:for evidence of the existence of this view. If you 59:Talk:Femininity/Archive 2#Definition of femininity 35:Ideas on how to give stability to the new lede 8: 55:Talk:Femininity/Archive 1#The lead sentence 147: 175:This archive was initially created by 7: 154:Knowledge Verifiability requirement 143:Comments related to rest of article 24: 88:collection of expanded references 45:Basic information concerning lede 148:Photo's need references as well 1: 200: 185:07:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 40:Comments related to lede 81:18,000 word discussion 191: 199: 198: 194: 193: 192: 190: 189: 188: 163: 150: 145: 137: 129: 121: 113: 74: 47: 42: 22: 21: 20: 18:Talk:Femininity 12: 11: 5: 197: 195: 173: 171:To be written 168:To be written 165:To be written 162: 159: 149: 146: 144: 141: 139:To be written 136: 133: 131:To be written 128: 125: 123:To be written 120: 117: 115:To be written 112: 109: 84: 73: 70: 68: 46: 43: 41: 38: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 196: 187: 186: 182: 178: 172: 169: 166: 161:To be written 160: 158: 155: 142: 140: 134: 132: 126: 124: 118: 116: 110: 108: 105: 101: 97: 93: 89: 82: 77: 71: 69: 66: 62: 60: 56: 50: 44: 39: 37: 36: 31: 27: 19: 174: 170: 167: 164: 151: 138: 130: 122: 114: 103: 99: 95: 91: 78: 75: 67: 63: 51: 48: 32: 28: 25: 92:absolutely 177:Dave3457 86:this 16:< 181:talk 152:The 104:both 100:only 96:and 183:) 61:. 57:, 179:(

Index

Talk:Femininity
Ideas on how to give stability to the new lede
Talk:Femininity/Archive 1#The lead sentence
Talk:Femininity/Archive 2#Definition of femininity
18,000 word discussion
collection of expanded references
Knowledge Verifiability requirement
Dave3457
talk
07:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑