792:
769:
755:
724:
700:
673:
663:
638:
624:
610:
579:
545:
216:
xenarthrans...", you may need to indicate that this was an early idea that has since changed. Otherwise, it seems to get stuck in my head, but then you talk about multituberculates, which from my understanding are possibly somewhere between Theria and
Monotremata (and not closely related to xenarthrans), and I start to get confused. Sorry if I'm making this difficult.
42:
236:
I've added some clarification on multituberculates and xenarthrans. Multituberculates I think are either sister to therians or to monotremes plus therians (we're not sure which of the two it is). Xenarthrans, of course, are placentals, although the discovery of sudamericids led some to resurrect the
215:
Is there a rough cladogram for some of this? I guess I'm having a hard time following some of this since you're telling the story of how they thought everything was related, and inevitably it changes. Where you say "Bonaparte considered the gondwanatheres to be probably most closely related to the
265:
Ultimately, this and the point above it are complicated because you almost need a general "evolution" article for all the groups involved. (Personally, I'm finding such specialty topic articles to be helpful for bringing information about multiple species together into a single article on a common
232:
when it was discovered in 1986; first proposed for all gondwanatheres in 1990; canonical by 1993; controversial in 1999; revitalized in 2009; now probably the leading contender); and that we have no idea what on Earth they are (canonical since 1999). Within those three strands, there are of course
436:
Part of it is placing them in context, since sudamericids are (probably) feruglios' closest relatives and therefore comparisons between the two are significant. Moreover, the history of sudamericids and ferugliotheriids has been intertwined so much that it's hard to cover the one comprehensively
415:
Maybe it's just me, but sudamericids seem to get a lot of mention in this article, which felt a little off because they're not in the family. I don't know... given their close/uncertain relations, maybe it's appropriate. I just thought I'd share my concern in case someone else brings it up.
255:
I prefer to keep description out of "Taxonomy". It's described in a single sentence there, though; perhaps I should add more (the article on the tooth itself has more discussion) but I'm also hesitant to write too much about this very tenuous record of a ferugliotheriid.
266:
thread.) I'm not saying that you have to do this. As more information is discovered and published, maybe someday such an article will be merited. For now, I'll let this pass and see what other reviewers think when you take this to FAC. –
298:"A diastema (gap) is present between the premolar and the incisor that would have been located in front of it." – The "it" at the end of the sentence is ambiguous. It carries over from the previous sentence (the fourth premolar), right?
446:
Same as what I said above about an evolution article. Again, I'm not saying we need such an article right now, and nor will I hold this article back. Maybe other reviewers at FAC will have some informative thoughts on the matter.
336:
This is just an opinion, but the red-linked "wear" should probably be spelled out in the text as "tooth wear" rather than just linked to it. It's a real shame that it's a red-link... I may need it soon when I write about
472:
Otherwise, it looks really good. The article meets GAN requirements, as far as I can see, but since you may take this on to FAC, I'll hold off promoting until we've worked out the details above. Great job!
224:. It's true that the frequent changes in classification are confusing. There have basically been three major hypotheses: that they are xenarthrans or something close to them (proposed for sudamericids when
311:
A second read through and I think you're right. I'm just used to looking for the target of the pronouns within the same sentence, particularly when dealing with prepositions and (in)direct objects. –
302:
It's between the incisor and premolar, so in front of the premolar. In re-reading the sentence, I don't think it's ambiguous, but I suppose we could substitute "the premolar" for "it".
199:"...and suggested that the teeth that Vucetichia was described on..." Personally, "was described on" sounds awkward and made me re-read the sentence. Maybe "from" instead of "on"?
228:
was discovered in 1984, argued against in 1990, disproven by 1993; no one believes this any more); that they are multituberculates or something close to them (proposed for
47:
80:
70:
126:
380:"All three are approximately equally old..." – Maybe "All three are approximately the same age..."? It sounded a little funny, but not a big deal.
345:"has undergone much more tooth wear" just sounds odd to me; in this context you'd always just say "wear". Yes, we need an article on the subject.
122:
52:
233:
minor differences, such as exactly what multis they are related to, and there have been some alternative proposals that gained little traction.
107:
252:"...described a single enigmatic tooth..." – Can you explain briefly what was enigmatic about it, or would that complicate things too much?
509:
221:
99:
437:
without also discussing the other. However, perhaps there are specific places where I have gone overboard with sudamericid material.
747:
515:
75:
630:
551:
166:
I will be taking on this review. The article looks good at a glance, but I'll have specific comments shortly. –
596:
571:
481:
455:
424:
319:
274:
174:
154:
115:
17:
238:
475:
449:
418:
313:
268:
168:
148:
92:
737:
559:
495:
438:
405:
388:
362:
346:
303:
257:
242:
241:" hypothesis which makes them a third major group in addition to marsupials and placentals.
204:
686:
555:
519:
761:
567:
563:
616:
498:
488:
462:
441:
431:
408:
391:
365:
349:
326:
306:
281:
260:
245:
207:
181:
161:
338:
400:"estuary, tidal flat, or coastal plain" should probably be linked.
189:: As I said, it looks good. Just a few minor details:
134:
103:
494:
This certainly will go to FAC. Thanks for the review.
361:Bigger version of a ridge; substituted that word.
527:Great article. I'm happy to pass it as a GA.
220:I've started a timeline of classifications at
8:
746:(images are tagged and non-free images have
30:
61:
33:
7:
741:, where possible and appropriate.
222:User:Ucucha/Gondwanathere timeline
24:
357:"a broad loph" – What's a "loph"?
790:
767:
753:
722:
698:
695:Fair representation without bias
671:
661:
636:
622:
608:
577:
543:
203:Changed "described" to "based".
518:for what the criteria are, and
1:
374:Range, ecology, and evolution
791:
768:
754:
723:
699:
672:
662:
637:
623:
609:
578:
544:
815:
525:
499:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
489:22:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
442:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
432:22:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
409:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
392:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
366:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
350:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
307:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
261:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
246:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
208:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
182:20:32, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
162:20:32, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
463:23:14, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
327:23:14, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
282:23:14, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
533:reasonably well written
760:(appropriate use with
522:for what they are not)
18:Talk:Ferugliotheriidae
735:It is illustrated by
687:neutral point of view
651:broad in its coverage
748:fair use rationales
719:No edit wars, etc.
592:factually accurate
762:suitable captions
89:
88:
806:
794:
793:
771:
770:
757:
756:
726:
725:
702:
701:
675:
674:
665:
664:
640:
639:
626:
625:
617:reliable sources
612:
611:
581:
580:
547:
546:
484:
478:
458:
452:
427:
421:
322:
316:
277:
271:
177:
171:
157:
151:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
814:
813:
809:
808:
807:
805:
804:
803:
684:It follows the
658:(major aspects)
482:
476:
456:
450:
425:
419:
320:
314:
275:
269:
230:Ferugliotherium
175:
169:
155:
149:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
812:
810:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
778:
777:
776:
775:
774:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
615:(citations to
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
524:
523:
504:
502:
501:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
413:
412:
411:
397:
396:
395:
371:
370:
369:
368:
354:
353:
352:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
250:
249:
248:
234:
212:
211:
210:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
811:
796:
795:
788:
785:
784:
782:
779:
773:
772:
765:
763:
751:
749:
743:
742:
740:
739:
734:
728:
727:
720:
717:
716:
714:
710:
704:
703:
696:
693:
692:
690:
688:
683:
677:
676:
669:
659:
655:
654:
652:
648:
642:
641:
634:
632:
620:
618:
606:
602:
601:
599:
598:
593:
589:
583:
582:
575:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
541:
537:
536:
534:
530:
529:
528:
521:
517:
513:
511:
507:
506:
505:
500:
497:
493:
492:
491:
490:
487:
485:
479:
464:
461:
459:
453:
445:
444:
443:
440:
435:
434:
433:
430:
428:
422:
414:
410:
407:
403:
402:
401:
398:
394:
393:
390:
385:
384:
382:
381:
378:
377:
376:
375:
367:
364:
360:
359:
358:
355:
351:
348:
344:
343:
342:
340:
334:
328:
325:
323:
317:
310:
309:
308:
305:
301:
300:
299:
296:
295:
294:
293:
283:
280:
278:
272:
264:
263:
262:
259:
254:
253:
251:
247:
244:
240:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
218:
217:
213:
209:
206:
202:
201:
200:
197:
196:
195:
194:
190:
188:
184:
183:
180:
178:
172:
164:
163:
160:
158:
152:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
786:
780:
759:
745:
736:
718:
712:
694:
685:
667:
657:
650:
628:
614:
605:(references)
604:
595:
591:
549:
539:
532:
526:
508:
503:
477:VisionHolder
474:
471:
451:VisionHolder
448:
420:VisionHolder
417:
399:
386:
383:
379:
373:
372:
356:
335:
315:VisionHolder
312:
297:
291:
290:
270:VisionHolder
267:
229:
225:
214:
198:
192:
191:
186:
185:
170:VisionHolder
167:
165:
150:VisionHolder
147:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
564:word choice
292:Description
104:visual edit
597:verifiable
239:Paratheria
226:Sudamerica
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
787:Pass/Fail
668:(focused)
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
193:Taxonomy
187:Comments
76:Criteria
781:Overall
568:fiction
540:(prose)
339:sifakas
127:history
108:history
94:Article
738:images
713:stable
711:It is
689:policy
649:It is
590:It is
570:, and
560:layout
531:It is
512:review
496:Ucucha
439:Ucucha
406:Ucucha
404:Done.
389:Ucucha
387:Done.
363:Ucucha
347:Ucucha
304:Ucucha
258:Ucucha
243:Ucucha
205:Ucucha
572:lists
514:(see
483:talk
457:talk
426:talk
321:talk
276:talk
176:talk
156:talk
136:Watch
16:<
594:and
556:lead
554:for
520:here
516:here
123:edit
100:edit
552:MoS
789::
783::
766::
758:b
752::
744:a
721::
715:.
697::
691:.
670::
666:b
660::
656:a
653:.
635::
631:OR
627:c
621::
613:b
607::
603:a
600:.
576::
566:,
562:,
558:,
548:b
542::
538:a
535:.
510:GA
473:–
447:–
416:–
146:–
125:|
106:|
102:|
764:)
750:)
633:)
629:(
619:)
574:)
550:(
486:»
480:«
460:»
454:«
429:»
423:«
341:.
324:»
318:«
279:»
273:«
237:"
179:»
173:«
159:»
153:«
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.