Knowledge

Talk:Ferugliotheriidae

Source 📝

426: 21: 257: 416: 395: 54: 88: 1716: 1228: 1205: 1191: 1160: 1136: 1109: 1099: 1074: 1060: 1046: 1015: 981: 190: 109: 652:
xenarthrans...", you may need to indicate that this was an early idea that has since changed. Otherwise, it seems to get stuck in my head, but then you talk about multituberculates, which from my understanding are possibly somewhere between Theria and Monotremata (and not closely related to xenarthrans), and I start to get confused. Sorry if I'm making this difficult.
1545:
correct and should stay in my opinion, but they only work because of they are procumbent. Labial/lingual is really the distinction we are looking for here. The enamel is on the labial surface in both cases. What about "The enamel band is restricted to the lower (labial) side in the lower incisors and the upper (labial) side in the upper incisors"? --
515: 309: 288: 1721: 319: 1314:
Well, the article discusses a family called "Ferugliotheriidae" and a genus called "Ferugliotherium", so I don't see any harm in clarifying whether other similar terms used in the article refer to one of those, or instead refer to something else (especially if the other similar terms are used in the
672:
I've added some clarification on multituberculates and xenarthrans. Multituberculates I think are either sister to therians or to monotremes plus therians (we're not sure which of the two it is). Xenarthrans, of course, are placentals, although the discovery of sudamericids led some to resurrect the
651:
Is there a rough cladogram for some of this? I guess I'm having a hard time following some of this since you're telling the story of how they thought everything was related, and inevitably it changes. Where you say "Bonaparte considered the gondwanatheres to be probably most closely related to the
1559:
Ah, I see what you mean. Using "labial" has the problem that the term hasn't been defined yet where I discuss the incisors, so adding it would make for a cluttered sentence. I used a different wording that explains it's labial for both the uppers and lowers, but avoids too much jargon; see what you
1544:
Sorry, I meant distal as in away from the body (like an appendage) not distal in the dental sense. Both uses of distal are wrong. I think mesial would mean that it is located between the two incisors and distal refers to the sides that border the diastema. Both dorsal/upper and ventral/lower are
1423:
I see crown height in the intro, but perhaps the basic shape (i.e. rectangular) of the molariform teeth could be included there. That plus crown height (to me) sets the basic stage for diet, etc. in a way that the comparison to multituberculates doesn't. That comparison is great for the bladelike
1299:
Not everything that is correct needs to be mentioned explicitly. They can be called ferugliotheriid gondwanatheres, but also ferugliotheriid animals, or ferugliotheriid mammals, or whatever. I know that we have guidelines for writing a good lead, but I fail to see how those guidelines would mandate
1279:
Regarding nomenclature, I hope it's correct to say this: "Members of the Ferugliotheriidae family are called ferugliotheriid gondwanatheres or simply ferugliotheriids." Also, I'd recommend splitting the lead paragraph by merely putting in a paragraph break before describing the particular fossils.
701:
Ultimately, this and the point above it are complicated because you almost need a general "evolution" article for all the groups involved. (Personally, I'm finding such specialty topic articles to be helpful for bringing information about multiple species together into a single article on a common
1529:
It's mesial, not distal, I believe. The source does say ventral for the lowers and dorsal for the uppers, which I've "translated" as lower and upper, but I agree that that is not necessarily the clearest way of saying it. Perhaps "front side" is better for both the lowers and uppers; I'm not sure.
668:
when it was discovered in 1986; first proposed for all gondwanatheres in 1990; canonical by 1993; controversial in 1999; revitalized in 2009; now probably the leading contender); and that we have no idea what on Earth they are (canonical since 1999). Within those three strands, there are of course
872:
Part of it is placing them in context, since sudamericids are (probably) feruglios' closest relatives and therefore comparisons between the two are significant. Moreover, the history of sudamericids and ferugliotheriids has been intertwined so much that it's hard to cover the one comprehensively
1525:
I think saying that "The enamel band is restricted to the lower side in the lower incisors and the upper side in the upper incisors" is a little confusing. There may not be a better way of saying it. You have to remember that these are procumbent and then envision what upper and lower means.
851:
Maybe it's just me, but sudamericids seem to get a lot of mention in this article, which felt a little off because they're not in the family. I don't know... given their close/uncertain relations, maybe it's appropriate. I just thought I'd share my concern in case someone else brings it up.
1414:
I think the family authority needs to be included. I'd do it myself, but I find it so odd that it's not there that I wonder if it was left off intentionally. Even though the text indicates that the family was named at the same time as the genus, the taxobox is there for a quick reference.
1596:
Finally, I think the last paragraph in the article is the paragraph that will be most interesting to the widest readership. But I wonder if those readers will get that far. Could a summary of that move to the introduction? Is there an earlier placement in general appropriate for this?
1655:(Bonaparte, J. F. 1986a. Sobre Mesungulatum houssayi y nuevos mamiferos cretácicos de Patagonia, Argentina. Actas IV Congreso Argentino de Paleontologia y Bioestratigrafia (Mendoza) 2:48-61)? I haven't been able to find it yet. I'm particularly interested in the etymology of 691:
I prefer to keep description out of "Taxonomy". It's described in a single sentence there, though; perhaps I should add more (the article on the tooth itself has more discussion) but I'm also hesitant to write too much about this very tenuous record of a ferugliotheriid.
702:
thread.) I'm not saying that you have to do this. As more information is discovered and published, maybe someday such an article will be merited. For now, I'll let this pass and see what other reviewers think when you take this to FAC. –
734:"A diastema (gap) is present between the premolar and the incisor that would have been located in front of it." – The "it" at the end of the sentence is ambiguous. It carries over from the previous sentence (the fourth premolar), right? 882:
Same as what I said above about an evolution article. Again, I'm not saying we need such an article right now, and nor will I hold this article back. Maybe other reviewers at FAC will have some informative thoughts on the matter.
1526:
Otherwise, one might imagine an enamel band (somehow) running near the gumline. Would saying that the enamel band is on the distal surfaces of the incisors be better or would that just lead to envisioning enamel-tipped incisors?
772:
This is just an opinion, but the red-linked "wear" should probably be spelled out in the text as "tooth wear" rather than just linked to it. It's a real shame that it's a red-link... I may need it soon when I write about
1300:
splitting up that paragraph. As it is now, the first paragraph gives a general taxonomic overview of what ferugliotheriids are, the second describes their anatomy, and the third their ecology (as far as that is known).
1992: 2012: 2007: 908:
Otherwise, it looks really good. The article meets GAN requirements, as far as I can see, but since you may take this on to FAC, I'll hold off promoting until we've worked out the details above. Great job!
660:. It's true that the frequent changes in classification are confusing. There have basically been three major hypotheses: that they are xenarthrans or something close to them (proposed for sudamericids when 1284:
has special requirements for the lead paragraph. This is obviously an extremely informative and well-researched article, but the lead paragraph needs to address the general public rather than specialists.
175: 35: 1264:, are all ferugliotheriids. I'd prefer to keep "Cretaceous mammals"-type categories limited to the lowest taxonomic levels (the genus, in this case), but I don't know whether there's consensus for that. 747:
A second read through and I think you're right. I'm just used to looking for the target of the pronouns within the same sentence, particularly when dealing with prepositions and (in)direct objects. –
2002: 156: 447:-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 2042: 738:
It's between the incisor and premolar, so in front of the premolar. In re-reading the sentence, I don't think it's ambiguous, but I suppose we could substitute "the premolar" for "it".
635:"...and suggested that the teeth that Vucetichia was described on..." Personally, "was described on" sounds awkward and made me re-read the sentence. Maybe "from" instead of "on"? 94: 664:
was discovered in 1984, argued against in 1990, disproven by 1993; no one believes this any more); that they are multituberculates or something close to them (proposed for
520: 1997: 1245:
I added the category "Cretaceous mammals". The category "Gondwanatheres" was already there, but my understanding is that not all Gondwanatheres are Cretaceous mammals.
1620:
FA status. It's a bit short for a FA article, but I suspect there is almost nothing known or conjectured about these animals that isn't already in the article. --
553: 2037: 1920: 1916: 1902: 1810: 1806: 1792: 1727:
Great work guys! Nice to have an unapologetically scholarly article up once in a while and make it feel like an encyclopedia (not least to offset those recurring
482: 472: 543: 1333:
If you have a reliable source that says they were named after Egidio Feruglio, I'd be happy to see it; I haven't yet found any. The original description of
2047: 64: 1987: 2032: 816:"All three are approximately equally old..." – Maybe "All three are approximately the same age..."? It sounded a little funny, but not a big deal. 448: 377: 2022: 781:"has undergone much more tooth wear" just sounds odd to me; in this context you'd always just say "wear". Yes, we need an article on the subject. 367: 525: 1674:
Sorry. I'm currently in a bad place for interlibrary loan (begging and borrowing from friends for obscure stuff). I assume it is named after
1319:. But the article is impressive even without making those fairly simple improvements. I won't be involved with this article anymore. Cheers. 669:
minor differences, such as exactly what multis they are related to, and there have been some alternative proposals that gained little traction.
1692:
I have a (far from ideal) reference for the genus name (see the section above), but none for the specific name. I suppose it's probably after
2027: 688:"...described a single enigmatic tooth..." – Can you explain briefly what was enigmatic about it, or would that complicate things too much? 1982: 1888: 207: 439: 400: 1410:
I'm always late to the party (when I make it at all), but I had a few suggestions regarding FAC. It looks as if that has now closed.
945: 657: 343: 873:
without also discussing the other. However, perhaps there are specific places where I have gone overboard with sudamericid material.
2017: 1898:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1788:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1274: 1183: 1778: 951: 548: 1066: 1424:
premolar, but I'm not sure too many people know what the rest of the cheek teeth in multis look like without looking it up.
1743: 332: 293: 1963: 1853: 268: 30: 342:-related subjects on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 571: 137: 1715: 1361: 1324: 1289: 1250: 987: 602:
I will be taking on this review. The article looks good at a glance, but I'll have specific comments shortly. –
1919:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1809:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1678:
and doesn't mean "wild glue beast". We, of course, need to verify that before it could go into the article. --
256: 20: 1315:
lead). And I see no reason to exclude from this article the person whom all of these things are named after:
1954: 1880: 1844: 1770: 1493:
It's defined somewhere in the middle of the "Taxonomy" section. Possibly the definition should be repeated.
1032: 1007: 1876: 917: 891: 860: 755: 710: 610: 590: 567: 87: 1938:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1926: 1889:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110717194315/http://vertebratepaleo.com/downloads/GondwanatheriaThesis.pdf
1828:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1816: 274: 200: 74: 70: 40: 1879:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1769:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 53: 1357: 1320: 1285: 1246: 674: 431: 189: 108: 1923:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1892: 1813:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1939: 1829: 1872: 1762: 1739: 911: 885: 854: 749: 704: 604: 584: 218: 78: 44: 1693: 1779:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120414214950/http://www.mnhn.fr/publication/geodiv/g00n3a4.pdf
1701: 1683: 1664: 1641: 1625: 1605: 1579: 1565: 1550: 1535: 1512: 1498: 1477: 1463: 1432: 1381: 1342: 1305: 1265: 1173: 995: 931: 874: 841: 824: 798: 782: 739: 693: 678: 677:" hypothesis which makes them a third major group in addition to marsupials and placentals. 640: 1946: 1836: 1675: 1372: 1316: 1451:, but that the two species were merged. I had assumed from reading that paragraph that 1490:
It may be worth defining (or linking to something explaining) p4 for the nonspecialist.
1905:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1795:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1281: 1122: 991: 955: 324: 1945:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1835:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1353: 1976: 1458:
I've added the species names to the relevant sentence; does that clarify the matter?
1197: 1003: 999: 227: 223: 1782: 1733: 1052: 444: 1600:
I moved it up to the beginning of the section and added a few words to the lead.
1507:
Sorry. I missed it. It's already defined at the first usage as it should be. --
1912: 1802: 1697: 1679: 1660: 1637: 1621: 1601: 1575: 1561: 1546: 1531: 1508: 1494: 1473: 1459: 1428: 1377: 1376:. I don't think it's necessary for the family article to have this information. 1338: 1301: 1261: 415: 394: 1911:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1801:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 421: 314: 1636:
Glad to see you back, Aranae. I've responded to each of your comments above.
1418:
Oversight on my part; I've now added Bonaparte, 1986 as the family authority.
194: 1968: 1858: 1748: 1705: 1687: 1668: 1645: 1629: 1609: 1583: 1569: 1554: 1539: 1516: 1502: 1481: 1467: 1436: 1385: 1365: 1346: 1328: 1309: 1293: 1268: 1254: 934: 924: 898: 877: 867: 844: 827: 801: 785: 762: 742: 717: 696: 681: 643: 617: 597: 574:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 73:. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the 1370:
Thanks. It's not as good a source as I should like, but I've added it to
216:
Did you know ... that blade-like teeth in the extinct mammalian family
774: 338: 1337:
was in an obscure publication that I haven't been able to locate.
836:"estuary, tidal flat, or coastal plain" should probably be linked. 318: 308: 287: 1720: 1651:
Also, do you perhaps have access to the original description of
250: 1893:
http://vertebratepaleo.com/downloads/GondwanatheriaThesis.pdf
1455:
now contained two species. Perhaps that could be clarified.
1993:
Knowledge featured topics Ferugliotheriidae featured content
2013:
Knowledge Did you know articles that are featured articles
2008:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
1883:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1773:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1766: 625:: As I said, it looks good. Just a few minor details: 168: 149: 130: 930:
This certainly will go to FAC. Thanks for the review.
2003:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
443:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 336:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1915:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1805:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 797:Bigger version of a ridge; substituted that word. 93:This article appeared on Knowledge's Main Page as 2043:FA-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance 1783:http://www.mnhn.fr/publication/geodiv/g00n3a4.pdf 193:A fact from this article appeared on Knowledge's 1901:This message was posted before February 2018. 1791:This message was posted before February 2018. 1443:I had to look around to see that not only was 963:Great article. I'm happy to pass it as a GA. 656:I've started a timeline of classifications at 1273:Sounds reasonable. I've raised the issue at 8: 1182:(images are tagged and non-free images have 43:. Even so, if you can update or improve it, 39:as one of the best articles produced by the 33:; it (or a previous version of it) has been 1871:I have just modified one external link on 1761:I have just modified one external link on 503: 389: 282: 102: 15: 254: 1998:Mid-importance Featured topics articles 534: 506: 391: 284: 1864:External links modified (January 2018) 2038:Low-importance Palaeontology articles 7: 437:This article is within the scope of 330:This article is within the scope of 457:Knowledge:WikiProject Palaeontology 273:It is of interest to the following 77:. If you can update or improve it, 2048:WikiProject Palaeontology articles 1177:, where possible and appropriate. 658:User:Ucucha/Gondwanathere timeline 460:Template:WikiProject Palaeontology 14: 1988:FA-Class Featured topics articles 1875:. Please take a moment to review 1765:. Please take a moment to review 793:"a broad loph" – What's a "loph"? 1719: 1714: 1275:Category talk:Cretaceous mammals 1226: 1203: 1189: 1158: 1134: 1131:Fair representation without bias 1107: 1097: 1072: 1058: 1044: 1013: 979: 639:Changed "described" to "based". 424: 414: 393: 317: 307: 286: 255: 188: 107: 86: 52: 19: 2033:FA-Class Palaeontology articles 1659:'s generic and specific names. 1574:Your solution is excellent. -- 954:for what the criteria are, and 477:This article has been rated as 372:This article has been rated as 2023:Low-importance mammal articles 1859:21:58, 29 September 2017 (UTC) 1: 810:Range, ecology, and evolution 451:and see a list of open tasks. 352:Knowledge:WikiProject Mammals 346:and see a list of open tasks. 2028:WikiProject Mammals articles 1969:20:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC) 1749:07:43, 26 January 2017 (UTC) 1227: 1204: 1190: 1159: 1135: 1108: 1098: 1073: 1059: 1045: 1014: 980: 355:Template:WikiProject Mammals 1983:Knowledge featured articles 1706:20:24, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 1688:20:14, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 1669:17:37, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 1646:17:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 1630:15:43, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 1610:17:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 1584:20:45, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 1570:20:24, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 1555:20:14, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 1540:17:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 1517:20:14, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 1503:17:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 1482:20:14, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 1468:17:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 1437:17:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 1386:17:42, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 1366:23:49, 17 August 2011 (UTC) 1347:22:19, 17 August 2011 (UTC) 1329:20:57, 17 August 2011 (UTC) 1310:17:12, 15 August 2011 (UTC) 214:The text of the entry was: 62:is the main article in the 2064: 1932:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1868:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1822:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1758:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1294:00:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 1269:11:56, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 1255:02:43, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 961: 572:Talk:Ferugliotheriidae/GA1 483:project's importance scale 378:project's importance scale 176:Featured article candidate 935:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 925:22:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 878:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 868:22:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 845:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 828:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 802:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 786:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 743:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 697:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 682:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 644:22:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 618:20:32, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 598:20:32, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 476: 440:WikiProject Palaeontology 409: 371: 302: 281: 237: 185: 105: 101: 2018:FA-Class mammal articles 1472:That reads well now. -- 899:23:14, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 763:23:14, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 718:23:14, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 95:Today's featured article 1754:External links modified 969:reasonably well written 1196:(appropriate use with 958:for what they are not) 463:Palaeontology articles 263:This article is rated 222:may have evolved into 1694:es:Anselmo Windhausen 1171:It is illustrated by 1123:neutral point of view 1087:broad in its coverage 1913:regular verification 1803:regular verification 157:Good topic candidate 138:Good article nominee 97:on January 26, 2017. 1903:After February 2018 1793:After February 2018 1447:a synonomized into 1184:fair use rationales 432:Paleontology portal 333:WikiProject Mammals 226:-like teeth in the 75:Knowledge community 41:Knowledge community 1957:InternetArchiveBot 1908:InternetArchiveBot 1847:InternetArchiveBot 1798:InternetArchiveBot 1155:No edit wars, etc. 1028:factually accurate 269:content assessment 113:Article milestones 1933: 1873:Ferugliotheriidae 1823: 1763:Ferugliotheriidae 1747: 1406:More FAC comments 1198:suitable captions 562: 561: 497: 496: 493: 492: 489: 488: 388: 387: 384: 383: 249: 248: 245: 244: 219:Ferugliotheriidae 65:Ferugliotheriidae 60:Ferugliotheriidae 27:Ferugliotheriidae 2055: 1967: 1958: 1931: 1930: 1909: 1857: 1848: 1821: 1820: 1799: 1737: 1736: 1723: 1722: 1718: 1230: 1229: 1207: 1206: 1193: 1192: 1162: 1161: 1138: 1137: 1111: 1110: 1101: 1100: 1076: 1075: 1062: 1061: 1053:reliable sources 1048: 1047: 1017: 1016: 983: 982: 920: 914: 894: 888: 863: 857: 758: 752: 713: 707: 613: 607: 593: 587: 516:Copyvio detector 504: 465: 464: 461: 458: 455: 434: 429: 428: 427: 418: 411: 410: 405: 397: 390: 360: 359: 356: 353: 350: 327: 322: 321: 311: 304: 303: 298: 290: 283: 266: 260: 259: 251: 240:Featured article 238:Current status: 192: 171: 152: 133: 112: 111: 103: 90: 56: 31:featured article 23: 16: 2063: 2062: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2054: 2053: 2052: 1973: 1972: 1961: 1956: 1924: 1917:have permission 1907: 1881:this simple FaQ 1866: 1851: 1846: 1814: 1807:have permission 1797: 1771:this simple FaQ 1756: 1732: 1725: 1676:Egidio Feruglio 1653:Ferugliotherium 1453:Ferugliotherium 1449:Ferugliotherium 1408: 1373:Ferugliotherium 1358:Anythingyouwant 1335:Ferugliotherium 1321:Anythingyouwant 1317:Egidio Feruglio 1286:Anythingyouwant 1247:Anythingyouwant 1243: 1120:It follows the 1094:(major aspects) 918: 912: 892: 886: 861: 855: 756: 750: 711: 705: 666:Ferugliotherium 611: 605: 591: 585: 566:This review is 558: 530: 502: 462: 459: 456: 453: 452: 430: 425: 423: 403: 358:mammal articles 357: 354: 351: 348: 347: 323: 316: 296: 267:on Knowledge's 264: 233: 232: 212: 169:August 23, 2011 167: 150:August 23, 2011 148: 129: 106: 12: 11: 5: 2061: 2059: 2051: 2050: 2045: 2040: 2035: 2030: 2025: 2020: 2015: 2010: 2005: 2000: 1995: 1990: 1985: 1975: 1974: 1951: 1950: 1943: 1896: 1895: 1887:Added archive 1865: 1862: 1841: 1840: 1833: 1786: 1785: 1777:Added archive 1755: 1752: 1724: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1649: 1648: 1633: 1632: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1407: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1242: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1051:(citations to 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 960: 959: 940: 938: 937: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 849: 848: 847: 833: 832: 831: 807: 806: 805: 804: 790: 789: 788: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 686: 685: 684: 670: 648: 647: 646: 577: 576: 560: 559: 557: 556: 551: 546: 540: 537: 536: 532: 531: 529: 528: 526:External links 523: 518: 512: 509: 508: 501: 498: 495: 494: 491: 490: 487: 486: 479:Low-importance 475: 469: 468: 466: 449:the discussion 436: 435: 419: 407: 406: 404:Low‑importance 398: 386: 385: 382: 381: 374:Low-importance 370: 364: 363: 361: 344:the discussion 329: 328: 325:Mammals portal 312: 300: 299: 297:Low‑importance 291: 279: 278: 272: 261: 247: 246: 243: 242: 235: 234: 213: 187: 186: 183: 182: 179: 172: 164: 163: 160: 153: 145: 144: 141: 134: 126: 125: 122: 119: 115: 114: 99: 98: 91: 83: 82: 57: 49: 48: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2060: 2049: 2046: 2044: 2041: 2039: 2036: 2034: 2031: 2029: 2026: 2024: 2021: 2019: 2016: 2014: 2011: 2009: 2006: 2004: 2001: 1999: 1996: 1994: 1991: 1989: 1986: 1984: 1981: 1980: 1978: 1971: 1970: 1965: 1960: 1959: 1948: 1944: 1941: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1928: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1904: 1899: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1869: 1863: 1861: 1860: 1855: 1850: 1849: 1838: 1834: 1831: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1818: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1794: 1789: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1759: 1753: 1751: 1750: 1745: 1741: 1735: 1730: 1729:Final Fantasy 1717: 1713: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1634: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1598: 1595: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1528: 1527: 1524: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1491: 1489: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1456: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1422: 1417: 1416: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1405: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1374: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1276: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1240: 1232: 1231: 1224: 1221: 1220: 1218: 1215: 1209: 1208: 1201: 1199: 1187: 1185: 1179: 1178: 1176: 1175: 1170: 1164: 1163: 1156: 1153: 1152: 1150: 1146: 1140: 1139: 1132: 1129: 1128: 1126: 1124: 1119: 1113: 1112: 1105: 1095: 1091: 1090: 1088: 1084: 1078: 1077: 1070: 1068: 1056: 1054: 1042: 1038: 1037: 1035: 1034: 1029: 1025: 1019: 1018: 1011: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 977: 973: 972: 970: 966: 965: 964: 957: 953: 949: 947: 943: 942: 941: 936: 933: 929: 928: 927: 926: 923: 921: 915: 900: 897: 895: 889: 881: 880: 879: 876: 871: 870: 869: 866: 864: 858: 850: 846: 843: 839: 838: 837: 834: 830: 829: 826: 821: 820: 818: 817: 814: 813: 812: 811: 803: 800: 796: 795: 794: 791: 787: 784: 780: 779: 778: 776: 770: 764: 761: 759: 753: 746: 745: 744: 741: 737: 736: 735: 732: 731: 730: 729: 719: 716: 714: 708: 700: 699: 698: 695: 690: 689: 687: 683: 680: 676: 671: 667: 663: 659: 655: 654: 653: 649: 645: 642: 638: 637: 636: 633: 632: 631: 630: 626: 624: 620: 619: 616: 614: 608: 600: 599: 596: 594: 588: 581: 575: 573: 569: 564: 563: 555: 552: 550: 547: 545: 542: 541: 539: 538: 533: 527: 524: 522: 519: 517: 514: 513: 511: 510: 505: 499: 484: 480: 474: 471: 470: 467: 454:Palaeontology 450: 446: 445:palaeontology 442: 441: 433: 422: 420: 417: 413: 412: 408: 402: 401:Palaeontology 399: 396: 392: 379: 375: 369: 366: 365: 362: 345: 341: 340: 335: 334: 326: 320: 315: 313: 310: 306: 305: 301: 295: 292: 289: 285: 280: 276: 270: 262: 258: 253: 252: 241: 236: 231: 229: 228:Sudamericidae 225: 221: 220: 210: 209: 208:June 22, 2011 204: 202: 201:Did you know? 196: 191: 184: 180: 178: 177: 173: 170: 166: 165: 161: 159: 158: 154: 151: 147: 146: 142: 140: 139: 135: 132: 131:June 29, 2011 128: 127: 123: 120: 117: 116: 110: 104: 100: 96: 92: 89: 85: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 66: 61: 58: 55: 51: 50: 46: 42: 38: 37: 32: 28: 25: 22: 18: 17: 1955: 1952: 1927:source check 1906: 1900: 1897: 1870: 1867: 1845: 1842: 1817:source check 1796: 1790: 1787: 1760: 1757: 1731:-gasms). -- 1728: 1726: 1656: 1652: 1650: 1617: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1409: 1371: 1334: 1278: 1244: 1222: 1216: 1195: 1181: 1172: 1154: 1148: 1130: 1121: 1103: 1093: 1086: 1064: 1050: 1041:(references) 1040: 1031: 1027: 985: 975: 968: 962: 944: 939: 913:VisionHolder 910: 907: 887:VisionHolder 884: 856:VisionHolder 853: 835: 822: 819: 815: 809: 808: 792: 771: 751:VisionHolder 748: 733: 727: 726: 706:VisionHolder 703: 665: 661: 650: 634: 628: 627: 622: 621: 606:VisionHolder 603: 601: 586:VisionHolder 583: 579: 578: 565: 554:Instructions 478: 438: 373: 337: 331: 275:WikiProjects 239: 217: 215: 206: 198: 174: 155: 136: 79:please do so 63: 59: 45:please do so 34: 26: 1616:Overall, I 1354:See page 46 1000:word choice 728:Description 568:transcluded 1977:Categories 1964:Report bug 1854:Report bug 1445:Vucetichia 1241:Categories 1033:verifiable 675:Paratheria 662:Sudamerica 521:Authorship 507:GA toolbox 205:column on 71:good topic 36:identified 1947:this tool 1940:this tool 1837:this tool 1830:this tool 1223:Pass/Fail 1104:(focused) 580:Reviewer: 544:Templates 535:Reviewing 500:GA Review 195:Main Page 1953:Cheers.— 1843:Cheers.— 1744:contribs 1657:Feruglio 629:Taxonomy 623:Comments 549:Criteria 265:FA-class 181:Promoted 162:Promoted 1877:my edit 1767:my edit 1734:Elmidae 1618:support 1560:think. 1427:Added. 1282:WP:Lead 1262:perhaps 1217:Overall 1004:fiction 976:(prose) 775:sifakas 481:on the 376:on the 349:Mammals 294:Mammals 197:in the 121:Process 1698:Ucucha 1680:Aranae 1661:Ucucha 1638:Ucucha 1622:Aranae 1602:Ucucha 1576:Aranae 1562:Ucucha 1547:Aranae 1532:Ucucha 1509:Aranae 1495:Ucucha 1474:Aranae 1460:Ucucha 1429:Ucucha 1378:Ucucha 1339:Ucucha 1302:Ucucha 1266:Ucucha 1174:images 1149:stable 1147:It is 1125:policy 1085:It is 1026:It is 1006:, and 996:layout 967:It is 948:review 932:Ucucha 875:Ucucha 842:Ucucha 840:Done. 825:Ucucha 823:Done. 799:Ucucha 783:Ucucha 740:Ucucha 694:Ucucha 679:Ucucha 641:Ucucha 339:mammal 271:scale. 143:Listed 124:Result 67:series 1260:Nor, 1008:lists 950:(see 919:talk 893:talk 862:talk 757:talk 712:talk 612:talk 592:talk 570:from 224:molar 29:is a 1740:talk 1702:talk 1684:talk 1665:talk 1642:talk 1626:talk 1606:talk 1580:talk 1566:talk 1551:talk 1536:talk 1513:talk 1499:talk 1478:talk 1464:talk 1433:talk 1382:talk 1362:talk 1343:talk 1325:talk 1306:talk 1290:talk 1251:talk 1030:and 992:lead 990:for 956:here 952:here 118:Date 69:, a 1921:RfC 1891:to 1811:RfC 1781:to 988:MoS 473:Low 368:Low 1979:: 1934:. 1929:}} 1925:{{ 1824:. 1819:}} 1815:{{ 1742:· 1704:) 1696:. 1686:) 1667:) 1644:) 1628:) 1608:) 1582:) 1568:) 1553:) 1538:) 1515:) 1501:) 1480:) 1466:) 1435:) 1384:) 1364:) 1345:) 1327:) 1308:) 1292:) 1253:) 1225:: 1219:: 1202:: 1194:b 1188:: 1180:a 1157:: 1151:. 1133:: 1127:. 1106:: 1102:b 1096:: 1092:a 1089:. 1071:: 1067:OR 1063:c 1057:: 1049:b 1043:: 1039:a 1036:. 1012:: 1002:, 998:, 994:, 984:b 978:: 974:a 971:. 946:GA 909:– 883:– 852:– 582:– 1966:) 1962:( 1949:. 1942:. 1856:) 1852:( 1839:. 1832:. 1746:) 1738:( 1700:( 1682:( 1663:( 1640:( 1624:( 1604:( 1578:( 1564:( 1549:( 1534:( 1511:( 1497:( 1476:( 1462:( 1431:( 1380:( 1360:( 1356:. 1341:( 1323:( 1304:( 1288:( 1277:. 1249:( 1200:) 1186:) 1069:) 1065:( 1055:) 1010:) 986:( 922:» 916:« 896:» 890:« 865:» 859:« 777:. 760:» 754:« 715:» 709:« 673:" 615:» 609:« 595:» 589:« 485:. 380:. 277:: 230:? 211:. 203:" 199:" 81:. 47:.

Index

Featured article
featured article
identified
Knowledge community
please do so
Good topic star
Ferugliotheriidae
good topic
Knowledge community
please do so
Main Page trophy
Today's featured article
Did You Know
June 29, 2011
Good article nominee
August 23, 2011
Good topic candidate
August 23, 2011
Featured article candidate
Did You Know
Main Page
Did you know?
June 22, 2011
Ferugliotheriidae
molar
Sudamericidae

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.