357:
336:
168:
147:
451:
81:
1188:
2013. And although the article, citing another BBC report, values the Durham copy at ÂŁ15m, this is a bit daft. If you look at Durham
University's own webpage on the First Folio, they say (though no doubt downplaying the value a bit to avoid attracting more thieves) that the damage inflicted by Scott - he took off the binding and flyleaf because they had identifying stamps on them - reduced the value from ÂŁ3m to ÂŁ1.5m.
290:
265:
429:
71:
53:
22:
178:
1187:
Raymond Scott, who probably stole the Durham First Folio, but was only convicted of 'handling' it, died in March 2012, not in 2013 as the article states. The date is correctly given in the BBC report which the footnote links to. The confusion probably arose because the inquest was not held till late
967:
I think the following text needs some work: "The
British Library holds the following copies: 1st impression (1623) – 2 copies; 2nd impression (1632) – 5 copies; 3rd impression (1663) – 1 copy, total 8 copies." What is termed the "second impression" here is actually referring to what is known as the
757:
The Manual of Style has some guidelines on what should and should not be shown as italic. For titles of works in article text they generally hould be in italic. Chapters or minor works etc. generally shouldn't. For the title of
Knowledge (XXG) articles there is no consensus (and the Manual of STyle
610:
What is the evidence, really, that
Hemings and Condell compiled the contents of the volume? The introductory epistles with their names attached to them, which is the only basis on know of on which one could try to substantiate this claim, have long been thought by a number of leading Shakespearean
697:
Thanks, but I am totally confused. Are you saying that the article title should be italicized ... or should not? And, how about its use throughout the article? The term "First Folio" always appears non-italicized throughout the entire course of this article. For consistency, we should either
920:
This text is nearly incomprehensible to somebody like me, who has no idea what Q1, Q3, etc. means. There is no explanation in the text, and no link to any explanation. I think this article should be deleted and rewritten from scratch so that it is a general encyclopedia article instead of a
698:
consider "First Folio" the name of a book (and thus italicize it throughout the article and in the article title) ... or not (and thus un-italicize it throughout the article and in the article title). Or am I missing some other considerations here? Please advise. Thanks. (
811:
listed in italics? From all of the responses above, I gather that the italics are "forced" by use of the
Infobox Book template. But, in this particular case, that "forced" format is incorrect. I assume that there must be a way to fix that. Any suggestions? Thanks.
497:, it is written that Brandeis owns only one of 230 copies. I don't know whether there is one that is definitvely more original than the others, but it seems incorrect to only mention Brandeis in this article. I've removed the Brandeis reference.
1101:
The three texts displayed show major differences between the text of the First Folio and the Bad Quarto, but only trivial differences with the Good Quarto. Is it worth having the Good Quarto text? If it is, perhaps an explanation would
655:
Why is the article title in italics? Shouldn't it be non-italicized? Also, what is the Wiki code that created the italicized title, in the first place? I was not able to spot any such code, when I went into the edit box. Thanks!
611:
scholars, to actually be the work of Ben Jonson, a much more likely party to have been directly involved in the acquisition and editing of materials for the volume. This claim should either the struck, modified, or documented. Thanks!
672:
Italic titles for articles whose title is a title of a work have been implemented by people who are enthusiastic about them following lengthy discussions (I'll see if I can find a link). You can find the code in
619:
Allegedly the collar's edge in the famous First Folio "Shakespeare" portrait has two faint, but visible letters spelling "EO". If that doesn't mean "Earle
Oxenford" can you please provide a better explanation?
806:
Correct. I agree ... "First Folio" is not the name of the book. Rather, it is just a generic description of the book, if you will. That is what prompted my original question ... why is the article title of
492:
I am fairly certain that I recently saw the First Folio in a display case at the
British Library in London, so I am skeptical that Brandeis has the only copy, which the text of this article implies. On the
511:
i am afraid, stephen, that you are mistaken. the article claims that there were 1000 first folios, and that 5 belog to the british library. you are thinking about the Quarto version. hope this is helpful.
587:
Can someone add an explanation to the chart of the work of the various compositors (A through E)? It is not at all clear what those numbers represent: pages? lines? percentages? I can't figure it out.
762:
template changed so that by merely including it in an article it will also make the title of the article display as italic (this is wrong in so many ways, but I digress). However, the “First Folio” is
758:
doesn't mandate either way); but there's a bunch of people who are being activist on this issue. I had suspected, and
Guillaume confirms here I think, that these people have managed to get the
407:
722:
776:
Anyways, in thinking about this it will help if you consider the article's title as a separate issue from uses of titles of works in the body of the article. --
1261:
397:
296:
270:
247:
1271:
1266:
1246:
921:
Shakespeare encyclopedia article. Short of that, somebody needs to do a lot of work to make it useful to anybody other than
Shakespearean scholars.
237:
373:
101:
1256:
1251:
972:, not the First. The same for the Third Folio and the Fourth Folio. So by that rationale the British Library holds only two First Folios. --
213:
364:
341:
1236:
1209:
1189:
992:
928:
105:
621:
531:
1241:
575:
501:
471:
link in the first paragraph of the article leads nowhere useful. It ought either to be dropped, or else a suitable article about
209:
191:
152:
33:
1231:
95:
58:
725:). I'm assuming that books are supposed to be treated in the same way, and that's what Knowledge (XXG) policy says here:
774:
be italicized (a folio is a particular size and binding of book, but completely generic and not specific to
Shakespeare).
991:
Shouldn’t be somewhere mentioned that a copy of the First Folio is crucial element in the development of the story of
892:
817:
703:
661:
726:
1122:" "Neville", written on the first surviving page, indicating that it may have once been owned by Edward Scarisbrick.
1062:
1022:
450:
847:
The template has an option to not italicise the title, so I've added that option to the infobox and Hey Presto! --
356:
335:
167:
146:
1107:
196:
39:
1213:
1193:
977:
932:
853:
735:
683:
625:
527:
1050:
924:
571:
563:
519:
301:
275:
952:
888:
813:
699:
657:
1058:
1053:. They act like fly paper and attract bizarre entries about breweries, wineries, comics, etc. as in the
1018:
674:
640:
372:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
523:
567:
1144:
479:
441:
109:
21:
1162:
1103:
369:
973:
848:
730:
678:
113:
560:
I'm writing this from memory... can't we add in some of these detail (accurately!) between us?
428:
1171:
948:
494:
1129:
636:
596:
1140:
1080:
1040:
1007:
781:
1161:
Disambig needed. The BBC mention makes him notable, if nothing else (I didn't look). See
1155:
183:
1225:
548:
80:
1167:
1073:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/Falstaff&limit=500
969:
86:
1125:
996:
721:
All I know about this is through discussion on the Opera WikiProject talk page (
592:
557:... and successors in the second and third folios, which are equally important.
289:
264:
1076:
1036:
1017:
Yes, and that "somewhere" is already correctly the article on Eco's novel. --
1003:
947:
labels. What else specifically in the article do you think needs improvement?
777:
173:
76:
723:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Opera/Archive_97#Itallics_in_opera_article_titles
435:
70:
52:
1032:
200:
177:
100:. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can
468:
434:
A news item involving First Folio was featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s
208:
Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
1217:
1197:
1177:
1148:
1133:
1111:
1084:
1066:
1044:
1026:
1011:
981:
956:
936:
896:
858:
821:
785:
740:
707:
688:
665:
644:
629:
600:
505:
482:
1057:
section you point out and which ought to be removed entirely. --
1031:
I meant that many articles on Knowledge (XXG) have section like
549:
http://bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.5/common/images/button_sig.png
423:
15:
768:
Mr. William Shakespeares Comedies, Histories, & Tragedies
449:
727:
Knowledge (XXG):Article_titles#Italics_and_other_formatting
1139:
And it was uncited. I've clarified and rectified that.
1072:
1035:
and whether this article couldn’t use one as well. --
1124:" The reader misses some unstated connection here.--
368:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1097:Comparison with Good and Bad Quartos - Boxed Image
1071:Well, frowned upon or not the only alternative is
1049:These sections are generally frowned upon – see
299:, a project which is currently considered to be
311:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Elizabethan theatre
112:. To improve this article, please refer to the
8:
330:
259:
141:
108:. To use this banner, please refer to the
47:
314:Template:WikiProject Elizabethan theatre
106:discuss matters related to book articles
1075:which is quite useless, but anyway. --
382:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Shakespeare
332:
261:
143:
114:relevant guideline for the type of work
49:
19:
1168:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
766:the title of the work (that would be
615:First folio portrait is Oxford proof?
7:
1272:Knowledge (XXG) In the news articles
540:More about the content would be good
362:This article is within the scope of
295:This article is within the scope of
92:This article is within the scope of
1262:Top-importance Shakespeare articles
993:The Mysterious Flame of Queen Loana
222:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Theatre
38:It is of interest to the following
554:Hemynge and Cordell as publishers
14:
122:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Books
1267:WikiProject Shakespeare articles
1247:High-importance Theatre articles
729:. Don't shoot the messenger! --
427:
385:Template:WikiProject Shakespeare
355:
334:
288:
263:
176:
166:
145:
79:
69:
51:
20:
402:This article has been rated as
297:WikiProject Elizabethan theatre
242:This article has been rated as
943:Added an explanation for the Q
1:
1218:08:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
1198:19:07, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
1112:20:21, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
601:18:30, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
376:and see a list of open tasks.
1257:B-Class Shakespeare articles
1252:WikiProject Theatre articles
1178:11:00, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
1149:22:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
1134:04:51, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
937:21:39, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
887:A-ha! Perfect! Thanks! (
645:10:16, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
630:20:48, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
446:section on 30 November 2014.
317:Elizabethan theatre articles
225:Template:WikiProject Theatre
1288:
1237:WikiProject Books articles
1085:13:20, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
1067:12:51, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
1045:12:19, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
1027:11:46, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
1012:10:26, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
506:23:31, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
408:project's importance scale
248:project's importance scale
125:Template:WikiProject Books
982:11:41, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
957:13:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
483:06:51, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
401:
350:
283:
241:
199:dedicated to coverage of
161:
64:
46:
1242:B-Class Theatre articles
534:) 10:16, 11 October 2006
189:This article is part of
897:21:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
859:17:44, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
822:17:01, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
786:16:44, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
741:16:17, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
708:15:33, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
689:11:05, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
666:01:47, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
635:Yes. They don't exist.
551:The "Mr WH" dedication
544:The First Folios have:
365:WikiProject Shakespeare
212:, or contribute to the
578:) 23:17, 21 April 2006
455:
28:This article is rated
1232:B-Class Book articles
675:Template:Infobox book
473:Shakespeare's Quartos
453:
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
388:Shakespeare articles
203:on Knowledge (XXG).
1204:William Shakespeare
1163:Talk:Eric_Rasmussen
987:Use by Umberto Eco?
547:The Jonson preface
370:William Shakespeare
308:Elizabethan theatre
271:Elizabethan theatre
192:WikiProject Theatre
1033:In popular culture
456:
214:project discussion
34:content assessment
927:comment added by
889:Joseph A. Spadaro
814:Joseph A. Spadaro
700:Joseph A. Spadaro
658:Joseph A. Spadaro
579:
566:comment added by
535:
522:comment added by
460:
459:
422:
421:
418:
417:
414:
413:
329:
328:
325:
324:
258:
257:
254:
253:
140:
139:
136:
135:
96:WikiProject Books
1279:
1174:
1059:Michael Bednarek
1019:Michael Bednarek
939:
770:) and so should
583:Compositor table
561:
517:
475:should be added
431:
424:
390:
389:
386:
383:
380:
359:
352:
351:
346:
338:
331:
319:
318:
315:
312:
309:
292:
285:
284:
279:
267:
260:
230:
229:
228:Theatre articles
226:
223:
220:
186:
181:
180:
170:
163:
162:
157:
149:
142:
130:
129:
126:
123:
120:
102:join the project
89:
84:
83:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1287:
1286:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1222:
1221:
1206:
1185:
1176:
1172:
1159:
1119:
1099:
989:
965:
963:British Library
922:
918:
653:
617:
608:
585:
542:
490:
465:
454:Knowledge (XXG)
387:
384:
381:
378:
377:
344:
316:
313:
310:
307:
306:
273:
244:High-importance
227:
224:
221:
218:
217:
206:To participate:
182:
175:
156:High‑importance
155:
127:
124:
121:
118:
117:
85:
78:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1285:
1283:
1275:
1274:
1269:
1264:
1259:
1254:
1249:
1244:
1239:
1234:
1224:
1223:
1205:
1202:
1200:Hugo Barnacle
1184:
1181:
1166:
1158:
1156:Eric Rasmussen
1153:
1152:
1151:
1118:
1115:
1104:Thomas Peardew
1098:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
988:
985:
964:
961:
960:
959:
917:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
828:
827:
826:
825:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
775:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
714:
713:
712:
711:
692:
691:
652:
649:
648:
647:
616:
613:
607:
604:
584:
581:
541:
538:
537:
536:
513:
512:
489:
486:
464:
461:
458:
457:
447:
432:
420:
419:
416:
415:
412:
411:
404:Top-importance
400:
394:
393:
391:
374:the discussion
360:
348:
347:
345:Top‑importance
339:
327:
326:
323:
322:
320:
293:
281:
280:
268:
256:
255:
252:
251:
240:
234:
233:
231:
204:
188:
187:
184:Theatre portal
171:
159:
158:
150:
138:
137:
134:
133:
131:
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1284:
1273:
1270:
1268:
1265:
1263:
1260:
1258:
1255:
1253:
1250:
1248:
1245:
1243:
1240:
1238:
1235:
1233:
1230:
1229:
1227:
1220:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1210:151.47.73.112
1208:He was black
1203:
1201:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1190:87.115.26.192
1182:
1180:
1179:
1175:
1169:
1164:
1157:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1116:
1114:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1096:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1051:WP:POPCULTURE
1048:
1047:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1000:
998:
994:
986:
984:
983:
979:
975:
974:AnnaGriffiths
971:
962:
958:
954:
950:
946:
942:
941:
940:
938:
934:
930:
929:66.28.250.194
926:
915:
898:
894:
890:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
860:
857:
856:
852:
851:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
823:
819:
815:
810:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
787:
783:
779:
773:
769:
765:
761:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
742:
739:
738:
734:
733:
728:
724:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
709:
705:
701:
696:
695:
694:
693:
690:
687:
686:
682:
681:
676:
671:
670:
669:
667:
663:
659:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
633:
632:
631:
627:
623:
614:
612:
605:
603:
602:
598:
594:
589:
582:
580:
577:
573:
569:
565:
558:
555:
552:
550:
545:
539:
533:
529:
525:
521:
515:
514:
510:
509:
508:
507:
503:
498:
496:
495:Brandeis site
487:
485:
484:
481:
476:
474:
470:
462:
452:
448:
445:
444:
443:
437:
433:
430:
426:
425:
409:
405:
399:
396:
395:
392:
375:
371:
367:
366:
361:
358:
354:
353:
349:
343:
340:
337:
333:
321:
304:
303:
298:
294:
291:
287:
286:
282:
277:
272:
269:
266:
262:
249:
245:
239:
236:
235:
232:
215:
211:
207:
202:
198:
194:
193:
185:
179:
174:
172:
169:
165:
164:
160:
154:
151:
148:
144:
132:
128:Book articles
115:
111:
110:documentation
107:
103:
99:
98:
97:
88:
82:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1207:
1186:
1160:
1121:
1120:
1117:St Omer Copy
1100:
1054:
1001:
990:
970:Second Folio
966:
949:Double sharp
944:
923:— Preceding
919:
916:Too advanced
854:
849:
808:
771:
767:
763:
760:infobox book
759:
736:
731:
684:
679:
654:
622:87.97.101.54
618:
609:
590:
586:
559:
556:
553:
546:
543:
524:81.157.82.24
499:
491:
477:
472:
466:
440:
439:
403:
363:
300:
243:
210:project page
205:
190:
94:
93:
87:Books portal
40:WikiProjects
997:Umberto Eco
809:First Folio
568:BenPlouviez
562:—Preceding
518:—Preceding
463:Quarto link
442:In the news
379:Shakespeare
342:Shakespeare
197:WikiProject
1226:Categories
1173:reply here
1141:Davidships
516:nicholas!
502:64.50.95.2
500:-Stephen (
480:Gerdthiele
850:Guillaume
732:Guillaume
680:Guillaume
436:Main Page
1055:Falstaff
925:unsigned
606:Printing
576:contribs
564:unsigned
532:contribs
520:unsigned
488:Brandeis
302:inactive
276:inactive
438:in the
406:on the
246:on the
219:Theatre
201:theatre
153:Theatre
30:B-class
1126:Wetman
637:Paul B
593:Ugajin
591:Done!
469:quarto
36:scale.
1183:Scott
1102:help?
1077:Ceplm
1037:Ceplm
1004:Ceplm
778:Xover
651:Title
119:Books
59:Books
1214:talk
1194:talk
1165:. --
1145:talk
1130:talk
1108:talk
1081:talk
1063:talk
1041:talk
1023:talk
1008:talk
978:talk
953:talk
933:talk
893:talk
855:Tell
818:talk
782:talk
737:Tell
704:talk
685:Tell
677:. --
662:talk
641:talk
626:talk
597:talk
572:talk
528:talk
467:The
238:High
195:, a
104:and
1002:--
995:by
772:not
764:not
398:Top
1228::
1216:)
1196:)
1147:)
1132:)
1110:)
1083:)
1065:)
1043:)
1025:)
1010:)
999:?
980:)
955:)
935:)
895:)
820:)
784:)
706:)
668:)
664:)
643:)
628:)
599:)
574:•
530:•
504:)
1212:(
1192:(
1170:|
1143:(
1128:(
1106:(
1079:(
1061:(
1039:(
1021:(
1006:(
976:(
951:(
945:n
931:(
899:)
891:(
824:)
816:(
812:(
780:(
710:)
702:(
660:(
656:(
639:(
624:(
595:(
570:(
526:(
478:-
410:.
305:.
278:)
274:(
250:.
216:.
116:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
