Talk:First Vienna Award - Knowledge (XXG)

1166:

result, in its current form, this is actually a clearly pro-Hungarian (anti-Slovak) article. So I consider the article non-neutral, because of its pro-Hungarian tone. Some sentences would therefore require direct references. To elaborate on this, the article could be even called chauvinist and the Hunagrian opinions here in this article are even worse. I do not care about anybodies opinion, but I do not think that it is ok, when an article like this is edited by people with opinions like those above (Andulka, Squash Racket etc.), who seriously assert that parts of a neighbouring country somehow "naturally" belong to Hungary (I mean, note that they do not even hide their incredible bias). This way any Slovak, Croat, Romanian or Serb could start claiming that "the Hungarians took all their territories from them in the 10th century", so that Hungary is "naturally" theirs and put tags into any Hungary-related article with such an argument. Also, most importantly: legally, the award was - togeher with the Munich Agreement - a violation of international law and for good reasons (because it was the result of pressure etc.) and modern Hungary has accepted this, implying that anybody having problems with the fact that the Award has been declared void and with any results of the award propagates fascism, legally at least. Therefore I think care is necessary in reading parts of the text, in which Hungarian activities concerning this award are depicted as positive or "not so bad".

1094:

Transcarpathia from 111,052 to 116,548 or by 4.95%. However that is in contrast to that of Slovakia which decreased from 650,597 to 585,434 or by 10.02%. Now between 1918 and 1924, 197,000 Hungarians fled Transylvania, 88,000 fled Slovakia, 45,000 fled Vojvodina and 19,000 fled Transcarpathia, which shows that there wasn't anything abnormal going on in Slovakia during the interwar years. Based on that and the average growth rate of 3.5% between 1920 and 1930, the actual number of Hungarians in Slovakia in 1930 was around 670,000, a figure to increase to about 710,000 by 1940. Now the post war population exchange of 75,000 Hungarians for 75,000 Slovaks as well as the 20,000 Hungarians deported to the ethnically cleansed Sudetenland who didn't return to Slovakia and 15,000 Hungarians who were deported as fugitives, would reduce the 710,000 to 600,000, assuming no population growth or loss as a result of WWII. This figure also doesn't take into account any Hungarian additional flight or deportation from Slovakia from 1944-1961 when the next reliable census was conducted.

546:"In 1930, this territory (except in Subcarpathia) comprised 550,000 Magyars and 432,000 Slovaks, and 23% of the total population of Slovakia, on 12,124 km." Am I correct in reading that the territory whose borders we've just described is partly in Slocakia, partly in Subcarpathia? Why do we then give a figure only for the part outside Subcarpathia? And how large a portion of the territory in question would be inside Subcarpathia? Without that for comparison, it's hard to tell whether the numbers here are for most of the territory in question, half of it, or what. - (Juro:) the problem here is that since Transcarpathia is now part of the Ukraine and Transcarpathia's proportion in the arbitration territories was rather small (15% I guess), the Ukrainians do not care much about this topis, so that I was only able to find these numbers. (I will try once again). The alternative is to leave out the sentence, but why not add these numbers at least? 3851:"Mr Orban signed a government decree to incorporate the 1956 Institute into the Veritas Historical Research Institute and Archive, created by the government five years ago and which critics say promotes a version of history that favours Mr Orban’s agenda. The Veritas institute is administered by the government, which has a big role in both appointing its leadership and setting its research priorities. The Hungarian government denies it is trying to shape the way that history is written. In a blog post, government spokesman Zoltan Kovacs characterised the 1956 Institute’s absorption by Veritas as “a minor administrative change to make research more efficient by integrating related fields into the same structure”. With just 10 employees, the institute had been part of the national library. All of the historians resigned before the handover, except one, who said he would “test” the new structure. After three weeks with Veritas, he also quit." 3681:"Mr Orban signed a government decree to incorporate the 1956 Institute into the Veritas Historical Research Institute and Archive, created by the government five years ago and which critics say promotes a version of history that favours Mr Orban’s agenda. The Veritas institute is administered by the government, which has a big role in both appointing its leadership and setting its research priorities. The Hungarian government denies it is trying to shape the way that history is written. In a blog post, government spokesman Zoltan Kovacs characterised the 1956 Institute’s absorption by Veritas as “a minor administrative change to make research more efficient by integrating related fields into the same structure”. With just 10 employees, the institute had been part of the national library. All of the historians resigned before the handover, except one, who said he would “test” the new structure. After three weeks with Veritas, he also quit." 1725:

school in general. So he does not "remain silent", but he focus on statistically relevant facts. In comparison, after annexation Slovaks lost schools attended by 45,709 children and not by 300 or 400. Tilkovszky also documents that Hungarian government gave task to document situation of Hungarian schools in Czechoslovakia (archive document OL, ME, Nemzetiségi o., bal. 47, G 1785/1938. Situation of schools of Hungarian minority in Felvidék). The conclusion was that the results cannot be used for political purposes, because it is hard to complain on something based on collected data. Does Janics put into doubts existence and authenticity of such documents or does he only declare his subjective opinion about their selection? By the way, Tilkovszky also documents that in the same time, Slovaks in Hungary had none high school and situation of elementary schools was much more worse than in Czechoslovakia.

2250:, only one of the four diffs you posted is actually for this article, and I'm a little antsy about addressing the whole issue in the forum of this specific talk page. I do see that all of those diffs are to the same effect regarding the "nonviolence" of Hungary trying to revise the Treaty of Trianon and get back its territory, so I understand the point you're making, but as long as we're on this talk page, I think we ought to stick to the diff for just this article. I feel concerned that we may not be able to effectively resolve the difference of opinion between yourself and OrionNimrod just by settling the question of what to do here, and that in the end you may need to seek a more general forum. We can give a try and see, though—perhaps we'll be lucky and this discussion will end with us all in agreement, and then it will be obvious what to do with the other pages. 2412:

not about Czecoslovak-Ukrainian battle. He also emphasize "invading, defending" I do not see this things in any other military infobox, and the article itself suggest who was the invader, also in the article does not mention any Czechoslovak-Hungarian military event, so I do not know how Czechoslovakia defended it, morover it collapsed due to the German occupation. In other way he name me "ultranationalist/irredentist" if I wrote in the talk page that after WW1 Czech soldiers were the invaders of Hungary, but he has happy to write Hungary was the invader, which in this case is correct. (And we do not talk about the ethical aspect, that Transcarpathia was 1000 years long part of Hungary, it had Hungarian population, comparing this the region has no Slovak and Czech population, it was very far from the Czech lands with zero Czech history.)

2699:"4 June 1920 The peace treaty of Trianon is signed, which reduces Hungary's territory from 288,000 square kilometres to 93,000 and its population from 18.2 million to 7.6 million. Millions of Hungarians find themselves in the successor states of the collapsed Monarchy, and the revision of the Treaty becomes the goal for Hungarian foreign policy." + "1932–1936 During the period when Gyula Gömbös is Prime Minister, foreign policy increasingly seeks support from the Fascist Germany and Italy, the Axis powers." "2 November 1938 The Italian-German court of arbitration returns from Czechoslovakia to Hungary the part of the Felvidék inhabited by Hungarians by the First Vienna Award, and in March 1939 the Sub-Carpathia is re-annexed. In August 1940 the Second Vienna Award gives back Northern Transylvania together with Székelyföld to Hungary." 1484:

representative in central government with full power for Slovakia, where obviously term Slovakia should exist and territory had to be defined. Naturally, long list of other laws reflected position of Slovakia as separate subject (e.g. § 4 of constitution act No. 122/1920 and plenty of others) even if Czechoslovakia was unitary state with central government in that time. When administrative division was reformed in 1927, it explicitly defined Slovakia in the Section II, § 1. On October 6, 1938, Slovakia declared political autonomy. It is clear also from records from negotiation in Komárno that Hungarian government was aware that it negotiates with representative of Slovak government (since the first day). So your theory about non existence of Slovakia is absolute nonsense and ignorance of elementary historical facts.

3210:, first I just suggested to use that which was used 15 years long on the page, and I did not agree that this thing was removed to pretend that Hungary used always aggression, because Hungarian politic before the First Vienna Award (the article) aimed to make a nonviolent (peaceful) revison to get back the Hungarian populated regions. But I see in the sources the correct term of "the peaceful revision" and in Hungarian sources also use the same term in Hungarian language. So this is a better term for the mainstream Hungarian politic/diplomacy of this period before the First Vienna Award (1920-1938), which is the background story and the way which led to the negotiations of the First Vienna Award. I also listed several historical things about Hungarian prime ministers who aimed the border revision on this way. 556:"...Czechoslovakia offered to Hungary the cession of 11,300 (9606 km² in Slovakia) in southern Slovakia and Subcarpathia, except for Bratislava, Nitra and Košice, on October 22 (the so-called Third Territorial Offer)." Again I want to make sure I understand this correctly before I edit. Would it be accurate to say "...Czechoslovakia made the so-called Third Territorial Offer on October 22: they offered to cede Hungary a territory of 9,606 km in southern Slovakia plus 1,694 km in Subcarpathia; Czechoslovakia would retain Bratislava, Nitra and Košice." - (Juro:) yes, I am sorry for the rather complicated formulation, but it arose because when writing the article, I was constantly adding information to the original text, so that the result might be somewhat overloaded. 3168:

don't think that really changes much, because the claim under dispute is that "Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy had sought a nonviolent way to support the territorial claims of the Kingdom of Hungary". I didn't really see anything like that in your sources; I got that Hungary started out pursuing revisionism diplomatically, and that Germany and Italy gave them some political support in this, which this article already goes through. But, I didn't see any of your sources describe Germany and Italy as "seeking a nonviolent way" to support them, and I think it would be rather strange to considering the military aggression of both in the years leading up to the First Vienna Award. So, I don't think that really leaves us with anything to do on this article still.

561:"In the meantime, the U.K. and France had proclaimed their disinterest, but readiness to participate in a four-power conference if such would arise." Can you paraphrase what you mean here by "disinterest"? "Disinterest" means not having a stake in something -- e.g. "we submitted our dispute to a disinterested party" -- and I suspect that's not what you meant to convey, but "uninterest" doesn't make sense here, either. - (Juro:) all English dictionaries I have say that disinterest(edness) means either: (1) indifference, apathy, unconcern, uninterestedness (2)unselfishness, (3) impartiality. As (only) the Oxford-Hachette says for (1) " utiliser de préférence uninterested", maybe uniterestedness would be better. 566:(I've already slightly edited this slightly for grammar, but there's an issue I'm less sure of.) "...Czechoslovakia and Hungary officially asked Germany and Italy for an arbitration award, and they declared in advance that they would submit to it." Is it important that this say "arbitration award" rather I'd like to reword it as "...Czechoslovakia and Hungary officially asked Germany and Italy to arbitrate, and they declared in advance that they would abide by the results of the arbitration." Is that in any way inaccurate? - (Juro:) no, it is accurate (but the second part of the sentence you have changed stems from an English text) 2969:: "The only possible solution of the questions is therefore that to be obtained by political means. The Hungarian opinion on this point has been repeatedly defined. According to that opinion cooperation with the Succession States must be made subject to the following conditions, which are the minimum demands and are of a "real political" character: — first, the conditions of subsistence of the Hungarian (Magyar) minorities numbering 3.5— 4 million souls must be really ensured; then, guarantees must be given to ensure political development and to provide that the present intolerable conditions shall be changed by 2227:, and that section is what about the non violent way? Yes the decision of Vienna Awards were reverted in the future, but this thing cannot erase the history and the previous events. Btw we could say the same thing about the Treaty of Trianon: by military occupation, in the shadow of weapons, Hungary was not allowed to participate in peace talk, Hungarians diplomats were accompanied by guards and forced to sign. What is the difference? A thing: Hungary got only mostly Hungarian population lands, while Czechoslovakia got huge non Slovak and non Czech populated lands from Hungary. 1634:

Rus') have been ceded to Hungary and should be included if whatever fork would be created. Another thing that makes me stand against the splitting is that we really don't need another playground for POV pushers – first the solve the issues here. While there were heated actions recently, I can't really see in what way the article or parts of it has been improved. I also have to emphasize that Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia, that means it should be informative, short and focused and should be expanded (or shortened) to fulfill these criteria. I highly recommend to contact

443:. The "province" was called Subcarpathia (Karpatalja) in Hungary till 1919/1920, then Subcarpathia(n Rus) (Podkarpatska Rus) in Czechoslovakia 1919-1938, then Carpathian Ukraine from November 1938 to March 1939 when the province was autonomous within Czechoslovakia, then,I suppose, again Subcarpathia when it was reconquered by Hungary 1939-1945, and since it is part of the Soviet Union/Ukraine it is called Transcarpathia. Obviously, Subcarpathia is the correct name if you are in Europe, Transcarpathia is the correct name if you are in the Ukraine. 3350:"While some in the Hungarian government called for military action" this is not in the text. Also "peaceful" is there, cherry picking? You add extra words and changing words to fit your taste? Even other sources use exactly the same term. This is not your decison what you think is reliable or not, that is a Hungarian historian. Did you read the full text? What is wrong there? I bet every Hungarian sources is not reliable for you... You did not wait when you complete rewrote many similar articles and using the same agressive edit war tool. 1088:

Hungary, the results were still far better than the borders of 1920 which appear to have been drawn by the blind, deaf, dumb and mute, who unfortunately drew frontiers following WWII which were just as pathetic. That's not saying it was perfectly just, as there was as mentioned Hungarian over reaching with regard to Kosice as well as Levice and its adjunct territory, and that the borders were based on the 1910 Hungarian census which was as skewed as the 1930 Czechoslovak census, as opposed to the pre-Magyarization 1880 census.

735:(1) No, the page is biased towards the other side. A standard Slovak text does not look like this. Many things have been left out. (2) You have not read the article, because what you are critizing as "missing" actually IS in the article (although what happened after WWII is a consequence of the WWII and not directly of the award itself, nevertheless the article contains these things). (3) Are you suggesting that Slovakia, which lost 1/3 of its territory, commited attrocities? Where, on the Moon? 1114:

after occupation of Bohemia potentially impossible. Of course, it was not internationally acceptable and Hungary had to hide real goals and territorial claims under the cover of "self-determination right". Hungary did not care about any self-determination, her goal was to restore multinational state (sic!). Also further actions of Germany and Hungary proven that "self-determination" is only cynic propaganda and tool used against self-determination of other nations.

282: 261: 1992:, it was no violance 18 years long during when Hungarian state sought constantly a way for negotiations for border revision, and negotiations were also not a violant thing. Those local conflicts after 18 years after and during the negotiations (not before when Hungary sought the way) are separate incidents by individual groups not military action by the Hungarian state. I do not know about Czecoslovak-Hungarian war before First Vienna Award, do you know? 3728:

country is allowed to use regarding Hungarian history (are you Slovak?), this would be a clear chauvinism. I did not see Wiki rules about your cenzorship. Also I do not see any rules that only those sources allowed to use on Wiki which was created under non-Orban government, however the mentioned sources does not say anything about Orban, and we do not know the political ideology of that historian, maybe he also do not like Orban, please ask him.

1775:

was looted with passive observation of the Hungarian police, my wife was raped and we fled", so your description of situation is very optimistic. "They were provided road vehicles and railway wagons for the transport" can mean in some cases that they went by their own carriage which was confiscated on borders, or they went by foot and if they were too slow they were smashed and forced to leave luggage, they fled because of torturing, etc.

114: 1897:. This was definitely not a "non-violent" move by Hungary, and the article says so itself further down in excruciating details. The section on its nullification even outright states that the award was deemed void and null because of all the military threats and actual violence and border skirmishes that happened before, during and even after it was signed. Czechoslovakia was literally strong-armed by Hungary and Germany. For 96: 124: 609:(1) Eastern and southern Slovakia was connected to the rest of Slovakia only through lines (a line?) passing the annexed territories and the border was closed, so that it was literally cut off from the rest of the world in terms of transport. There were not as many railway tracks as there are today at that time. (2) Slovakia remained part of Czechoslovakia, but soon after, in March 1939, Slovakia became independent. 215: 190: 2289:, what source are you getting this "nonviolent" language from? On this particular article, the question is actually about the efforts of Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy, not the Kingdom of Hungary itself, and I'm not sure we've seen any well-respected historical support for that "nonviolent" framing yet here. Maybe I'm just missing something. Would you be willing to provide a quote or two from historians? 🍉◜⠢◞ↂ 370: 292: 3242:

propaganda department masquerading as a history research institute and thus inherently unreliable. I'm fine with the suggestion to use "diplomatically" instead of non-violent, thought I'm certain this will be a tough sell to OrionNimrod. BTW, since OrionNimrod has now resumed editing the article without first waiting for a response, I've also taken the liberty to edit it with my suggestion.

3097:"He was fully resolved on war, and he tried to persuade me to pledge the Hungarians to march into Slovakia from the south as the Germans entered Czechoslovakia. He gave me to understand that as a reward we should be allowed to keep the territory we had invaded. This project was put in the form of a request, and I replied with all courtesy but with great firmness that there could be 21: 732:

according to which the Hungarians are collectively treated as war criminals and this bill is still in effect! "in which 68,407 Magyars were resettled to Hungary in exchange for Slovaks resettled to Czechoslovakia" - so exactly how many Slovaks were "exchanged" for those 100 thousands Hungarians? and under what circumstances were the Hungarians driven out of the country? Gabor

65: 2881:"The basic tenets of his revisionist concept, corresponding to those which most (semi-) official circles also represented, comprised the program of reconciliation in internal political and economic affairs and their wise administration in order to “command the respect and sympathy of the civilized world,” and, on this basis, to realize the revision of the treaty through 3716:: Eva S. Balogh clearly have a certain leftist political orientation as presented on the link. And? There are many historians with different political view, but in our case both use the same term: "peaceful revision" if you like or not, I do not know the political ideology of the other historian, but if they are different this thing more stronger validate the subject. 537:"The Hungarian delegation, on the other hand, consisted of experienced persons and the Hungarian government discussed the negotiations on 8 October." Is something intended here that I'm missing, or should this simply be "The Hungarian delegation, on the other hand, consisted of experienced persons. The Hungarian government discussed the negotiations on 1718:"Tilkovszky focuses on the purposeful breach of mother-tongue education of Slovaks, however, it remains silent about the fact that for example in Nyitra-Pozsony county there were 300 less students in Hungarian language schools than Hungarian nationals in the county and 405 more students in Hungarian-Slovak or Slovak schools than Slovak nationals." 1810:

plain stupid. I'm not here to declare who is right, or more right, or whatever, not to judge or misjudge any historian who deals with the topic and won't drawn into this. I was all about to say that as it current state it is pretty much one sided, do not present all point of views, is exuberant, wordy and not ready for a splitting.

1791:

nationalist historians" is inappropriate labeling. It is a little bit funny, because according to another "Slovak nationalist historians", Slovak mainstream historiography is still driven by Marxist and Czechoslovak views and not by "national". If somebody has weak arguments, he frequently starts with giving adjectives.--

3312:, as you can say I did compromize, I used sources, changed the text, using exactly the same term, but Azure agressively force his own POV, even falsifying text, and removing arbitrary Hungarian historian (who say exactly the same as other sources) based on his political assumption as a cenzorship with personal insults. 634:"...the Hungarian authorities increased compulsory education from 6 to 8 years at least." Trying to follow this: I take it that 6 years was the normal minimum in Hungary, but they agreed to require 8 in the annexed territories. What had been the previous law in the annexed territories, 8 years or something even more? 3402:

can find journalist in every country who critize any person. You want to discredit an Hungarian historian and Hungarian academic institute with tens of historians. There are no wiki rules about that only historian works under Repulican government or only historian works under Democrat government are allowed to use.

1740:

proving that such atrocities were not random local events but global trend and in many cases they were executed, supported and tolerated by Hungarian army and police with participation of United Hungarian Party (led by war criminal Andor Jaross) and terrorist groups from Hungary (volume II of his collection).

2437:

sense to you that "Bilateral negotiations, agreement, fight in the diplomatic field = non violent way" as you say, but the only thing that would convince me to take that position in this article would be a few strong sources that also took that precise position on this specific topic. Remember that this is a

3482:

Anyways, it looks like nothing changes if it remains or gets removed. There are four other citations supporting the "peaceful" phrase, which doesn't really differ from "diplomatic", so I don't understand why it has to be changed. Also these citations except for Sadecki don't support the strength part

3401:

New york times in 1934, 1938 used the same "peacful revison" term, your linked content has no business with the article. Opposite parties and many people do not like Orban government, like in USA Repulicans critize everything what Democrats do and inverse Democrats critize everything Repulicans do. I

3192:

Given all this, why not just stick to "purely diplomatic" for Hungary's part, at least where it applies (Szèlinger says "until 1935")? That phrasing is more precise, easier to support, and far less likely to provoke argument or misunderstanding. With a heated topic area like this, I think we need all

2336:

was in 1920, and Hungary did not make any violance until the start of the negotiation of the First Vienna Award. Also German and Italy did not support any Hungarian violance until the First Vienna Award. It was negotiations. Do you know about any violance? I do not know, so saying non-violent way why

2142:

This video made by a foreign guy about the situation: before the Munich agreeement Hitler asked military assistence from Hungary if needed offering upper Hungary back, but Hungary refused this and Hungary used negotiations. The guy say in the video Hungary got back territories whitout military action

2006:

Ive posted sourced text detailing how it was the Hungarian army that conducted border skirmishes, and you responded by ignoring it and continuing to peddle your fantasies about "individual groups". It is clear to me that you refuse to listen and are arguing in bad faith. I will now seek other editors

1165:

This is funny, I am writing a sort of paper about this topic and while this text is mostly quite exact and I also use the sources cited here, but the sources do not seem to be used at many points in this article (maybe they were used originally, but someone has changed the text in the meantime). As a

1087:

The First Vienna Award was indeed along the lines of self determination, much moreso than the joke of a border that was drawn after WWI. Indeed all of the border changes done to Hungary between 1938 and 1941 resulted in to date, the fairest frontiers yet seen. Although they were all over-reaches by

832:

The problem is that it is relatively long ago that I have written the original version, furthermore I have used quite many sources, various encyclopedias etc. , some passages are simply from books in the library, and some passages are not from me. But I will add the most important sources, of course.

731:

This page is totally biased towards the Slovak side and talks only about atrocities committed by Hungarians, and does everything to conceal the fact that those territories ceded were predominantly Hungarian and still are nowadays. There is no telling about the Treaty of Trianon, or the Benes decrees,

580:

Thanks again. I've incorporated this, except for one where I'm still unclear on the intent: sentence with "...disinterested...": "In the meantime, the U.K. and France had proclaimed their disinterest, but readiness to participate in a four-power conference if such would arise." What were the U.K. and

3565:

Are Eva Balogh is good historian and the other not by you? I bet you do not know anything about them and you did not read the full historian text what you want to remove, you also did not answered which thing exactly is bad in the source. However I used just for the main context which declared every

3557:

I used academic sources in the topic. Many historians have different opinions in many cases everywhere in the world, why it is so surprising? But in this case both historians use the same term "peaceful revision" what you want to deliberately remove. Because both use the same term this also validate

3260:

as you can see the sentence the "peaceful" term talk about Hungary and not about Italy and Germany anymore. Many other sources say the same, also it is ] when you remove modern Hungarian historian source regarding Hungarian history. Are you the censorship, based your POV assumption? Orban government

3241:

Not sure why you think Rothermere's hoping for a non-violent solution matters when he only speaks for himself, and not for Germany and Italy, which is what the issue is about. Also, I would like to ask OrionNimrod to refrain from quoting people working for Orban's VERITAS institute. That place is a

3188:

has "abstention from violence as a matter of principle." Clearly the Hungarian government was not practicing that kind of politics; your sources paint the picture to me that they proceeded along diplomatic lines at least in part because they were pessimistic on their military prospects at first, and

2411:

is collapsed in 15 March. He also removed sources from the infobox. It is also strange, in the infobox he put the Czechoslovak-Ukrainian (Carpathian Sich) conflict/fight together with the Hungarian invasion of Transcarpathia, it should be a separate article, the topic is about the Hungarian invasion

2344:

Hungarian representatives considered an overt attack on Czechoslovakia too dangerous and wanted to preserve that country's relations with France and Britain, whose support in the question of Hungarian minorities was conditional on Hungary's not joining with Germany in military actions. This outraged

1919:

Do you talk about 1918 when Czecz troops attacked Hungary when it was disarmed to occupy huge full Hungarian populated lands? And after Hungarians were not allowed to participate in peace talk but Hungarian diplomats were accompanied by guards and forced to sign a dictate in 1920? How should we call

1762:

I am curious about statistic data proving his opinion. They are witnesses (teachers) proving right opposite (see collection of archive documents referenced above). Also communication between Slovak and Hungarian government indicates that this had continuous character. E.g. Slovak government threaten

1633:

splitting the article. As it's been noted by three well-established users earlier, the title is clearly POV and inappropriate. A second thing is, in accordance with the First Vienna Award (FVA) both the southern part of what is today Slovakia and the south-eastern part of Subcarpathia (Subcarpathian

1113:

The First Vienna Award was NOT indeed along the lines of self-determination. In the broader context, the goal of the Hungarian government was elimination of Czechoslovakia and occupation of Slovakia. The partial goal was to take as much territory as possible and to make further existence of Slovakia

1054:

We have to also emphasize, that this Award was widely accepted in Europe before WWII, as this was in line with Wilson's peace proposals. Any Slovak should admit that Trianon took too many territories from Hungary, so this award was quite in line with justice. Of course, Hungarian side was too greedy

1050:

This is strong POV, I would say that most (if not all) the infrastructure "lost" came from former Kingdom of Hungary, built by the taxes from the Kingdom, so emphasizing the losses here are dubious, especially about unconnected railways: everybody knows that the railway system (the most startegic at

1045:

Slovakia lost 21% of its territory, 20% of its industry, over 30% of its arable land, 27% of its power stations, 28% of its extractable iron ore, over 50% of its vineyards, 35% of its swine and 930 km of railway tracks. Eastern Slovakia lost its central town (Košice). Eastern Slovakia and many towns

824:

I just linked this to the German-language wikipedia article. I notice that article gives no indication of sources/references (nor is the topic taken up on its talk page). Juro, you were obviously majorly involved in the German-language article: can you give some indication what you've been using for

3536:

Are you blind or just trolling? Why are you suddenly claiming that Balogh's words are good if you're using them as a source, but bad if I'm using them as a source? When Balogh wrote the article on the Vienna Awards, you were OK with using her as a source, but when the same Balogh wrote that VERITAS

3377:

If you trust Eva Balogh enough to use her as a source, then you should read what she has to say about VERITAS. Or stay being a hypocrite. Nevertheless, there is plenty of academic source about how the people working for VERITAS lie about history. If you try to defend this propaganda institute, then

2138:

That is why the existence of the negotiations, Italy, Germany did not make military action for Hungary but by new treaty to achieve the First Vienna Award which is the topic. The future is violent, but the topic is about that time. The topic is talk about the past not the future in the context. The

1824:

Ok. You simply had to be more careful with radical statements like "proved totally wrong by Kálmán Janics", because it seems that these "proofs" are relative weak (or at last your quotes) and opponents have very serious counterarguments. There is huge difference between "proved to be totally wrong"

1774:

Czechoslovakia had serious diplomatic conflict with Hungary about her approach, so she did her homework and documented issues. It is fully supported by published archive materials that in many cases this "all the administrative, military and public safety support" can be interpreted as "my property

3167:

Thank you for making a sincere effort there with the sources. I can see from them, as you say, that there is good support for claiming that Hungary's efforts to revise the Treaty of Trianon started out peacefully, at least in terms of being purely diplomatic. For this particular article, though, I

1746:

Opinion, that Tilkovszky "gives dubious arms to the hands of the anti-Hungarian nationalism" is pointless, because we can also say that works of Slovak historians about post-war persecutions of Hungarians (Šutaj, Olejník and others) ""give dubious arms to the hands of the anti-Slovak nationalism".

1739:

approach. More, also works of other authors prove that these atrocities had not local, but global and systematic character. These opinions are fully supported by archive materials, e.g. Ladislav Deak published collection of more than 200 archive documents from period November 2, 1938-Mach 14, 1939

1693:

The article also states that "The Slovak government recommended to stay in the Southern Slovakia and promised "adequate help and protection" – However, Czechoslovak press told directly after the Munich Agreement, that border adjustments with Hungary is imminent, thus the Czechoslovak officials had

641:

Hungary had 6 years, Czechoslovakia 8 years. After protests from the annexed territories Hungary increased at least the compulsory education from 6 to 8 years for whole Hungary (as I understood the source which I do not have here now). The other protests were rejected because the Hungarian finance

3171:

We could just stop there, but just for the benefit of the larger situation, I'll give in to the temptation to say, I would not take "peaceful" and "nonviolent" as synonyms in this context, and I can say with confidence that you'll raise the hackles of many English speakers if you put it that way.

2021:

Before the negotiations it was no any military things, which means Hungary sought a non violant way 18 years long before the negotiations. Why do you ignore 18 years? The topic is talk about the past not the future in the context. That individual border actions were not official military deeds by

1809:

Look, I did not came up with this to argue over the statements, just to show that there are others who have completely different point of view, thus to point out relying alone on Tilkovszky (or whoever else), even bringing him up as a someone who has some universal truth proved by this or that is

1568:

potential neutrality issues: description of history of annexation will not be more or less neutral just because it is in one article with the arbitration. A half of spitted text is documented by Hungarian historian (Tilkovszky Loránt) and publication reviewed by another Hungarian historian (Ránki

1512:

I am not interested about relevance of other articles. If you believe that they do not meet criteria for separate article, discuss it on appropriate talk page and it does not prevent creation of other article with significant importance. Annexation of Southern Slovakia (1938-1945) is article with

1261:

Agreed. Why are there so many paragraphs of "data" that have absolutely no citations? It would seem the entire entry should be scrapped and only rewritten if sources can be obtained because right now it looks biased and without basis. This Juro character has already been banned for anti-Hungarian

2436:

So, what I really want to see is a quote or two from widely-respected historians that frames the efforts of Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy to support Hungary's territorial claims in the years before the First Vienna award as "nonviolent", preferably using that exact word. It may seem like common

2370:

Horthy declared to Polish Envoy Leon Orłowski in Budapest on October 16, 1938, "A Hungarian military intervention would be a disaster for Hungary at this moment, because the Czechoslovak army has currently the best arms in Europe and Budapest is only five minutes from the border for Czechoslovak

2082:

Hungary did not make any violent way any military action before 18 years long (from 1920) before the negotiation of the First Vienna Award, Hungary always seeked the opportunity of the peaceful revision, the existence of negotiations itself prove it, that making a negotiation means a non violent

1860:

Although the Hungarian government demanded arbitration, it had not had have the prior approval of Germany, which insisted on its negative opinion, Hitler's disagreement, Ribbentrop's disappointment with previous negotiations with Darányi and the danger of military conflict if one country did not

1778:

The expulsion was not restricted to people "who opted to move away", such opinion is dubious and abhorrent with current knowledge. Various Hungarian organizations (official or unofficial) arbitrarily forced to leave any non-Hungarian population they decided and (again) this is fully supported by

1483:

Slovakia existed as a separate geographical unit and subject of law from the early beginning of Czechoslovakia. The border between the Czech lands and Slovakia was exactly historical border between the Czech lands and Kingdom of Hungary. Since December 10, 1918 (Law No. 64/1918) Slovakia had own

974:

I don't think there is any requirement—at all—that sources be of a particular nationality, just that they be accurate and (when taken together) reasonably impartial. But if you think that particular, relevant sources with a different perspective have been ignored, please bring them forward. I'll

3727:

That source was by Hungarian historian, even not by Veritas publication, I see you start to blacklist Hungarian people. I see you blacklist people who are working in Hungarian institutes, do you have a job list what is not allowed by you to use for Hungarian history? Perhaps the sources of your

1724:

I am not sure about relevance and severity of such information. Such territory had dozen thousands of Hungarians, while difference of 300 students is really very small. Hungarians had 800 elementary schools in 30's, so we are talking about statistical difference in range "one to something" per

1493:

If you mean by "non existence" fact, that Slovakia was not subject of international law (I have already tried to explain the difference in other place without any answer or counter argument), it does not mean that Hungary annexed some general Czecho-Slovak territory, but it annexed particularly

1093:

Some may point to the 1930 Czechoslovak census to show how 'few' Hungarians there were, however the data is skewed. Between 1920/21 and 1930/31, the Hungarian population of Transylvania increased from 1,305,753 to 1,349,563 or by 3.36%, that of V from 363,450 to 376,176 or by 3.50% and that of

3870:

It is a spamming is you copy paste all the time the same. So you say only Hungarian historians can used who are strongly anti Orban, but Hungarian historians who support the Hungarian government are not allowed at all in Wiki if you are the boss of the article? Please show any Wiki rules about

2421:

Here I offered a compromize not to mention Hungary or Czechoslovakia, but he is not willing to accept it. He also force his view there. The text was "Soviet union won land" which is true and the topic itself, but he force to rewrite "Czechoslovakia lost land"... I do not understant why it is a

1698:

These were just a few obvious issues that came onto my mind after quickly reading through the article (there might be many more). It definitely needs more point of views. I have to say, that until the article is in this bad shape (I think it's very appropriate to borrow the expression from the

1589:"If unsure, or with high profile or sensitive articles, start a "Split" discussion on the article talk page, and consider informing any associated WikiProject(s). Additionally, adding one of the templates below will display a notice on the article and list it at Category:Articles to be split". 1021:

i wouldn't go as far as claiming disputed neutrality, i have read the article and i don't find it pro-slovak. but i find your comment about hungarian non-translated sources amusing in the light that the majority of both the referenced slovak and polish sources are in --- slovak and polish...

3816:

Wiki is not about that you as a main censor blacklist every sentence of 100 Hungarian historians based on your political POV. Which means you accuse a Hungarian historian because he works on an history institute, which institute is critized by another Hungarian historians who has a different

1673:

a) Tilkovszky focuses on the purposeful breach of mother-tongue education of Slovaks, however, it remains silent about the fact that for example in Nyitra-Pozsony county there were 300 less students in Hungarian language schools than Hungarian nationals in the county and 405 more students in

1046:

in southern Slovakia lost their railway connections to the rest of the world, because their only railway lines ran through the annexed territories and the border was closed. Carpathian Ruthenia was deprived of its two principal towns, Uzhhorod and Munkachevo, and of all of its fertile lands.

3284:

The revisionist idea was part of the state propaganda of the period and was ubiquitous in the public space (where it expressed itself through monuments, among other ways) and in popular culture.1 While some called for military action, Hungarian revisionism mainly sought to reclaim the lost

1790:

This broad speculation completely ignores facts that the book is probably the only one complex monography about annexation since 70's what explains its frequent usage. Regardless to some "communist stuff" (mandatory in that time) it is rich on facts and checked by other historians. "Slovak

1494:

Southern Slovakia, what is absolutely correct and accurate term. Of course, Hungary illegally annexed also other territories. The question of international independence of superior territory (Czecho-slovakia, Slovakia) unit is absolute irrelevant, if we talk about concrete geographic unit.

3790:

I just think it's hypocritical of you to quote Eva Balogh only when it suits you (such as when you cited her work for the article). When Eva Balogh talks about the Vienna Award, you clap and agree with her, but when she starts to talk about Veritas, you accuse her of being paid by Soros.

975:

admit that I would prefer that they not be sources written only in Hungarian and never translated into any other language, because almost no non-Hungarian here can read Hungarian, but I'm sure that if you are intellectually honest in your use of those sources that should not be a problem.

1642:

I also can't leave without a word the fact that "half of spitted text is documented by Hungarian historian (Tilkovszky Loránt)", considering many of the views presented in his book (Južné Slovensko v rokoch 1938-1945) were criticized and proved totally wrong by Kálmán Janics in the

908:" and be proposed for Featured Article Candidacy. The article appears to be thoroughly researched, seems to have the ring of truth, reads well, is neutral, touches on an important but largely unfamiliar topic, and thus will add something substantial to readers' sum of knowledge. 2357:, allowed Hungarian demands to be reflected in an appendix to the agreement. It requested Czechoslovakia to resolve the minority question with Hungary and Poland within three months by bilateral negotiations, or matters would be resolved by the four signatories of the agreement. 1464:

articles. Anyway, I think the name is quite important because of NPOV issues. There was no Slovakia in 1938. Hungary gained parts of "Czecho-Slovakia" (southern territories of Slovakia and Subcarpathian Rus). Moreover, the topic can be also discussed at Hungarian articles (e.g.

3117:

In the declaration which Csáky read on behalf of the Hungarian Government, this very idea was brought to the fore: “Germany, Italy and Japan have entered into an alliance to restrict the spread of war and to bring to the world as speedily as possible a lasting and just peace.”

629:

and according to the last nationwide census of 1930, Kosice had 70232 inhabitants, out of which 60.2 % (that is 42 334) Slovaks and Czechs, implying that some 12000 Slovaks and Czechs remained thare (the number of the remaining Czechs being rather negligible, I assume).

1354:, though I might be wrong. It's an old proposal lasting 4 days, and then nothing happened. Only the proposer thinks it should be split. Since then the article has increase by 10K bytes, about a 1/6 increase or ~16.666% increase in size. The proposer also refers to 3326:

You were supposed to wait for Mesocarp's response before you resumed editing the article. This was all started by your impatience. And stop projecting. You're the one pushing POV when you insert opinions from the director of Orban's VERITAS propaganda institute.

1694:

five weeks to consider whether they stay or leave. Those officials and farmers who opted to move away (81,000 people) were given all the administrative, military and public safety support and they were provided road vehicles and railway wagons for the transport.

997:

With your remark on proposal of an autonomous Slovakia within Hungary during WWI: "wich they denied" is so ambiguous I can't even guess what you mean. The referent of "they" is unclear and "denied" can mean either "refused to agree to" or "refused to admit had

458:

Yes, I think that since we are writing in English, we should probably use mostly "Carpathian Ruthenia" or "Transcarpathia" except when specifically referring to what it was called at a particular time. Looks like Knowledge (XXG)'s main article on the region is

3048:"They were afraid that their attack on Czechoslovakia would turn the Little Entente as well as England and France against them, and a military conflict like that could end only with the defeat of Hungary. They wanted to satisfy their territorial demands in a 616:"30,000 Czechs and Slovaks had to leave the town during the same month." I presume "...were forced to leave..." Any chance of more detail on this? e.g. was that the total Czwchand Slovak population of the town in question, if not who was chosen to leave, etc. 852:

It appears to me that most of the information is taken from Ladislav Deáks works, which are considered problematic by Hungarian and Third-Party historians. I would suggest adding information from Gergely Sallai's "Az elso becsi dontes" to the wiki article.

2462:, thanks for the feedback! Well words in wiki articles does not follow exactly original words because it would be copyright, I saw the "nonviolent way" word in this article since 2008, nobody opposed 15 years long until this user. However Hungary used the 551:"However, since a common Polish-German frontier would mean a kind of encirclement of Germany..." I'm guessing this means to say "However, since a common Polish-Hungarian frontier would mean a kind of encirclement of Germany..." Right? - yes, of course 2445:. The current statement in the article, that Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy merely "supported" Hungary's claims without further qualification, seems to be beyond dispute; we need further sources if we're going to be more specific than that. 🍉◜⠢◞ↂ 697:

sc. stand for "scilicet" in Latin and means "namely", it is used in scientific quotes to show what was meant even though it was not said explicitely; at that time, Hungarians used the term nationalities in the sense Non-Magyar nation(anlitie)s

3598:

Yes, I did indeed mistake you for OrionNimrod. I apologize for that. Nevertheless, my point about Balogh stands. If OrionNimrod trusts Balogh's words when it comes to the Vienna Awards, then he should also trust her when it comes to VERITAS.

2981:"For many years Hungary has lost no opportunity of declaring that she does not want to attain redress for the injustices done to Hungary — and through it the solution of the Danube problem so important for the whole of Europe — by war but by 2378:

And refering to some border conflict by individuals during the negotiations this does not represent the Hungarian state, and did not overwrite the previous 18 years long seeking a nonviolent way until the negotiations, I think it is quite

1923:

After this, the Hungarian state did not use military action to achieve the First Vienna Awards, by negotiations and it was reverted mostly Hungarian populated regions. Please provide academic sources that Hungarian state used violant way.

521:"Based on the negotiations provisions of the Munich Agreement, Hungary required negotiations with Czechoslovakia as early as on 1 October." This is a little confusing. I'm guessing it means one of the following less ambiguous statements: 2742: 2728:" + "He formulated the Hungarian foreign policy - without renouncing the revision - in such a way that we did not immediately create enemies for ourselves - indicated the historian, who pointed out that this revision meant carrying out 993:

Not sure where you are going with your remark on ethnic identities. Yes, this tends to happen when borders shift, but mainly with people of mixed ancestry or culture (pretty hard to claim to be a Hungarian if all you speak is Czech and

3490:

Though some called for military action, Hungarian revisionism primarily aimed to regain lost lands peacefully. In the interwar period, Hungary was weaker economically and militarily than the neighbours against which it had territorial

541:." - (Juro:) the point is that they were experienced and in addition their government had discussed the whole thing - as opposed to the Czechoslovak/Slovak government which did not manage to discuss anything prior to the negotiations. 2517:"Hungarian representatives considered an overt attack on Czechoslovakia too dangerous and wanted to preserve that country's relations with France and Britain, whose support in the question of Hungarian minorities was conditional on 982:

should be linked, and there might even be reason for a paragraph about them, but since they entirely post-date the Vienna Awards, there would be more reason to mention the First Vienna Award in the article on the Beneš decrees than

598:"Eastern Slovakia and many towns in southern Slovakia lost a railway connection to the remaining world." What exactly did they lose a connection to? Obviously not literally the world. The rest of what remained legally Slovakia? -- 1423:

It will help us to stay focused and it will be very clear what is primary topic of each article. More, it will make also referencing cleaner, because frequently I need to reference events during the occupation and not the award

2022:

Hungarian state. It was not Czech-Hungarian war. All these things are facts. The Hungarian state did not use any violant way before the First Vienna Award, but for example later these things were violent way by military action:

944:

Many declared different ethnic identities after the border shifted, because belonging to the minority nation implied significant disadvantages: in particular, in terms of schooling and access to civil service positions in both

2371:

aircraft. They would neutralize me before I could get up from my bed" Therefore, Hungary decided to fight Czechoslovakia in the diplomatic field instead and to push for territorial revision in the spirit of Munich Agreement.

2620:"Both Great Britain and the Soviet Union responded generously to Hungary's diplomatic efforts. After July 2, when Rumania repudiated the British guarantee and moved over to the Axis camp, Great Britain no longer minded a " 422:

This was an edit of a professor in the German encyclopedia and I just have translated it. You can delete it. I suppose it was supposed to mean "and now you will find out what Hungary wanted as opposed to Germany". (Juro)

2466:

term which means "nonviolent" as synonyme. Or should we use that term? Also if no violance happened why would be the problem saying nonviolent? Or do you know any violence before the negotiation of the First Vienna

1638:

and ask their help to optimize the article, improve its language, erase superfluous or redundant parts, combine/simplify sentences/paragraphs and make it more of a encyclopedia article than a.. whatever it is now.

446:

Now, if you read the rest of the text, in one place it says that Subcarpathia was renamed Carpathian-Ukraine and from there, I have used (I hope at least) the names as they were used during the respective periods.

2111:

Local border conflicts by individuals were not organized by government level as military action, the violent way it would be if Hungary declare a war and the Hungarian army Czech forces, it was not Czech-Hungarian

3946:

I think we can keep the “peaceful revision” word, since this was the politic of the Kingdom of Hungary in that time, and that's how it's referred to in today's academic sources, and in the newspapers of the time.

2362:

Official Hungarian circles were aware that Hungary alone was too weak to enforce its territorial demands towards Czechoslovakia because they knew that any attack would encounter the resistance of the more modern

2088:

1767:"Those officials and farmers who opted to move away (81,000 people) were given all the administrative, military and public safety support and they were provided road vehicles and railway wagons for the transport" 2382:

He changed other things in the same way, could you provide a third opinion in the other cases too? I also asked academic historical sources about his claim, but he did not provide any, just starting a personal

450:

If you want to avoid this confusion of names, you could rename both Subcarpathia and Carpatho-Ukraine "Carpathian Ruthenia", which is a name that has never been used officially so that it is "always correct".

410:

I'm attempting a general copy edit. I can see that I may have quite a few questions, so I'll put them here. Juro, I take it this article is basically yours, so if you can answer that would be appreciated. --

3811:

Actually the article is Magyar Nemzet journal (not Veritas) and the Hungarian historian make an individual interview, no Veritas publication. However Veritas is reliable academic source if you like or not.

2173:

The fact that you've now devolved into posting a link to some random guy on youtube is incredibly damning. You are not here to build a well sourced encyclopedia, you're here to push historical revisionism.

744:

Leave it to them. Mr Juro, Slovak POV-pusher spreads his lies all over this miserable project. That's why people should read studies and encycopaedias written by experts, not chauvinist wannabe historians.

1954:. Hungarian troops withdrew after the arrival of Czechoslovak reinforcements, which killed nine Hungarians and captured prisoners. Two days later, Hungarian troops again attempted to cross the Danube near 1562:

60 kB Probably should be divided (although the scope of a topic can sometimes justify the added reading time)". Current size of article is 69,352 bytes and we have proposals and plan for further extension.

2193:, I provided many arguments, academic sources. It was no any violance until the negotiations of First Vienna Award... and the topic is about that, and this comment was about the background of this event. 2560:"The dissertation argues that the Italo-Ethiopian conflict had a great impact on the Hungarian foreign policy, and as a direct consequence Hungary began to look to Germany as her primary ally, giving up 710:"Rightlessness" isn't an English word. Do you mean "lawlessness", "deprivation of rights", or "injustice"? The second seems to make the most sense, but the first would be an English-German false cognate. 2743:

https://www.arcanum.com/hu/online-kiadvanyok/2vhSzakkonyv-magyarok-a-ii-vilaghaboruban-2/a-delvideki-hadmuvelet-1941-aprilis-874/tendenciak-a-ket-vilaghaboru-kozott-88B/az-elso-becsi-dontes-szovege-8AB/

3540:

The sentence "Though some called for military action" must specify who is meant by "some" if we want to use it on Knowledge (XXG). It is clear from the context that Sadecki meant "some in the state".

1055:

to stop at negotiations, -- but did the Czech-Slovak army stop at Trianon border in 1920 ??? I think it is quite "egal". So this is why I have modified the source article. Please revert with care :)

1963:

Such actions continued during the negotiations and after the First Vienna Award. During the second day of bilateral negotiations (October 10, 1938), Hungarian troops murdered a railway officer in

3514:, Stop inventing texts which is not in the source, but you change deliberately the key word which is presented in all sources. It is clearly show us the bad faith of your edit to fit your taste. 1901:

to try to re-frame this as Horthy seeking a "non-violent" path.... well he might as well claim that Hitler proved he sought non-violence when he forced the Munich agreement onto Czechoslovakia.

3067: 1022:

hungarian references would simply add more credibility and would be a nice counterweight to the slavic sources, alas there are none. ps. reading hungarian is easy, understanding is harder :)

3189:

of course they did turn to military means down the road. So, without some strong sources using the specific term "nonviolent," you'll have a rough time winning people over to that phrasing.

4169: 2103:

in Budapest on October 16, 1938, "A Hungarian military intervention would be a disaster for Hungary at this moment, because the Czechoslovak army has currently the best arms in Europe and

3837:

The "Hungarian historian" interviewed by Magyar Nemzet has a name, you know? His name is Sándor Szakály and he is the director of Veritas. The Foreign Policy Research Institute said that

1409:

I propose to move section "Life in the annexed territory" to separate article "Occupation of Southern Slovakia" (or annexation or any other term you wish; name is secondary for now) .

3776:

I do not agree that you think that you want to be exclusively to the boss of article and what you add/delete everything in the article is OK, but you arrogantly ignore other editors.

2253:

Fortunately, at least as far as this article goes, I think there is an easy way to settle this. The disputed language in question is simple: in the lead, OrionNimrod wants to change "

2551:"This confused the Hungarian government led by Gyula Gömbös as far as the revision of the Trianon Peace Treaty was concerned, since - as it is clear from the documents - until 1935 3874:

Btw as you see I deliberately used many kind of sources, to present many kind of opinion. I am not want be to decide how are the bad and good guy. All of the academic historians.

2307:

You are right, this talk page veered far away from the original issue, so I think it is fine if we narrow down the talk back to the one diff concerning the sentence in the lede.

3294:

So if you trust Balogh enough to use her writings as a source, then you should also trust her when she tells you to never believe VERITAS. Unless you're a hypocrite, of course.

669:

it was a kind of secondary school (general education, around 3 years, age somehere between 10 and 15), the schools do not exist since 1948 anymore, so I do not know the details.

723:

So I'm through it all. Really good article, hope I've been of assistance in making it clearer; I'll jump on these few remaining issues pretty much as soon as I get answers. --

3419:

Yes, wiki is not about your personal political agenda, therefore you should not quote the director of the extremely political VERITAS institute as a source. It's that simple.

3066:

This book was written by an American historian published in USA, many details about that era and if you search "peaceful" term you will find many related content in the book:

1522:

Summary: if you can document concrete wikipedia rule to be violated I am open for further discussion. Otherwise, I will split content appropriately, extend and improve it.--

1419:

Occupation - history of occupation, life in the annexed territory between 1938-1945, etc. It is broad topic with significant impact on Slovak-Hungarian and it is worthy it.

492:, Poland by the Hungarian government". As it is, it implies that there was a Hungarian government in Poland. Does it mean (1) or (2)? Or something else that I'm missing? -- 3016:"Hungarian views on territorial revision seemed united to outsiders. In practice the closest that they came to consensus was in stating that the frontier changes had to be 3007:"Hungarian views on territorial revision seemed united to outsiders. In practice the closest that they came to consensus was in stating that the frontier changes had to be 1763:

in January 1939 that if Hungary does not stop expulsion of Slovak teachers and elimination of Slovak schools, Slovakia realizes the same measures against local Hungarians.

649:

the parenthetical remark "they were led by the military" is unclear. Does it simply mean that "the territories were ruled by the military"? - yes, directly by the military.

3660: 3029:, diplomatic means of attaining them, although this was only successful for the predominantly Hungarian-inhabited parts of Czechoslovakia, recovered in the autumn of 1938. 2664:"But on the other hand, the Hungarian public had to understand that while we cannot give up on the detached territories, we also cannot constantly propagate this issue; 513:

Juro, thanks for your continuing help. More questions follow; sorry there are so many, but I'm trying to avoid accidentally changing rather than clarifying meanings: --

3654:“Veritas was established five years ago by the Orbán government with the clear duty to create, express, popularise a nationalist-populist view of contemporary history,” 3395:

Still "Hungarian government" is not in the text, it is funny for you important the text but you change the "peacful revison" word which used in all sources as key word.

2634: 2353:. However, Hitler did not agree because he was not satisfied with the previous passivity of Hungary and because he had his own plans for Central Europe. Prime Minister 1904:

Ask yourself, if a mugger points a gun at you and demands you to hand over your wallet and you comply to avoid being hurt, does that mean the mugger was "non-violent"?

3440:

please stop inventing things what is not in the historian work. Perhaps you can provide a list which academic Hungarian sources are allowed to use by your cenzorship?

3285:

territories through peaceful means. In the interwar period, Hungary was weaker economically and militarily than the neighbours against which it had territorial claims.

426:

So is this article mostly a translation from the German-language wikipedia? If so, then just like any other source on a non-trivial article we should state that. (JM)

3773:

article not by me... and it is well know that Soros and Orban always critize each other, and? I do not know what is the bussines with the "peaceful revision" term.

3079:. Hungary lost two thirds of her territory at the end of the first world war; one out of every three Magyars became “ethnic minorities” in their own land of birth. 2748:"In the Hungarian revisionist politics, it became more and more noticeable that there is a serious contradiction between the civilian and the military leadership. 904:

Thank you for the opportunity of editing this interesting article without interruption. I suggest that it be retitled to the somewhat more familiar "First Vienna

3261:

govern Hungary since 13 years and before 1998-2002, do you say all Hungarian works by Hungarian people are do not permitted to use which was created under period?

683:

one source says "fired" another source says "expelled", thus I assume that they were fired and some of them also expelled among those who were generally expelled.

4222: 2774:

Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini sought to peacefully enforce the claims of Hungarians on territories the Kingdom had lost to Czechoslovakia and Romania in 1920

1635: 527:"Invoking the negotiations provisions of the Munich Agreement, Hungary demanded as early as October 1 that Czechoslovakia begin negotiations." - (Juro:) this one 1743:

They also prove that Tilkovszky did not "exaggerate". More, understatement of forced expulsion, torturing, etc, as "exaggeration" is innapropriate and cynic .

3374:

Mesocarp suggested to use "diplomatically" instead of "peacefully". I'm fine with his suggestion. You, obviously, aren't. Nevertheless, you're still outvoted.

3398:

Could you tell me what exactly the lie in that Hungarian historian source? But is not your duty to decide, wiki is not about your personal political agenda.

2093:. Therefore, Hungary decided to fight Czechoslovakia in the diplomatic field instead and to push for territorial revision in the spirit of Munich Agreement. 690:"...because the (sc. non-Magyar) nationalities have lost more lives." I'm guessing this should just be "...because the nationalities have lost more lives." 2398: 2056: 805:

life after...? It needs citation all over! Please only include things if it has a ground! Military regime in the Upper Hungarian territories and so on...--

41:. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. 3894:

Yes, it is indeed schizophrenic to cite Balogh only when it personally suits you, and dismissing her as "paid by Soros" when citing her doesn't suit you.

348: 3475:, you claimed that there are academic sources stating that the VERITAS institution is biased. And yet the only backup you linked was an article from the 4187: 3724:

The topic is the First Vienna Award and the "peaceful revision" politic of Hungary not the political things of today. All of these things are off topic.

750: 3558:

it. At least I provided a lot of sources from many authors, ironically you are unable to provide any in same cases what are you want to force in other

3109:

as, in my opinion, the chances were that neither England nor France, nor even Soviet Russia, would passively watch a German entry into Czechoslovakia."

2976:— either by enforcing the provisions of Article 19 of the Covenant of the League of Nations or by means of other effectual international agreements. " 2349:, a Hungarian government emissary had officially asked the German and Italian delegations to resolve Hungarian demands together with the questions of 591:

Ah, now I got your problem. They were uninterested an the arbitration, but presumably would participate in a big Munich-like conference and agreement.

3132:, to repair, at least partly, the injustices of the Peace Treaty of Trianon. Our hopes in the League of Nations in this regard remained unfulfilled.” 3105:

I pointed out that, in any case, our restricted forces were not strong enough to overrun the fortifications that had been erected along our borders.

2438: 435:

In that same paragraph: can I assume that "Subcarpathia" here refers to what in English is known as "Transcarpathia"? The geography seems right. (JM)

28: 4212: 4197: 3559: 2416: 2066: 1513:

significant importance, because it had high impact on mutual relationship, goes far beyond question of the award and requires appropriate attention.

623:

The details I could find: "As early as from 9 November 15000 Czechs and Slovaks left the town, and after 10 November approximately the same number."

338: 166: 3720: 2479: 1947: 1449: 1536:

You should be interested in "the relevance of other articles" because of FORK issues. You can not just split an article If the topic is sensitive

3823:

Do you think you are who decide who is the bad and good guy? Please provide me a list which Hungarian historian is allowed by you! I am curious.

3371:

Yes it's in the text. Do you understand the concept of context? Or who do you think they meant if not the Hungarian government? Explain yourself.

221: 195: 172: 3657: 3004: 1051:

that time) were built in logic of the Kingdom, which was cut off from Hungary after Trianon, in order to make difficult any defence of Hungary.

4217: 3731:

Should I check if you would use your own country' sources what would be the ideology behind them? And should I decide it is fit for me or not?

3722: 3033: 2766: 2492: 2023: 676:"... and 862 out of 1119 Slovak teachers expelled." Does "expelled" here simply mean "fired" or were they actually banished from the territory? 581:

France disinterested / uninterested in? The result? The means of achieving it? I still don't get it, and I guess its not just the one word. --

3664: 3291: 642:

minister said: "Since it is not Hungary that was annexed to Slovakia (Upper Hungary)... we will not adopt the principles of Czechoslovak law".

4143: 4124: 4102: 4078: 4059: 4037: 3093:

Hitler wanted Hungary to attack Czechoslovakia from the south and wanted to provide weapons, but Hungary clearly refused the military action:

2786: 2714: 1140:

here, the article is written from a Slovak point of view. Please use English sources if possible as the topic is controversial and sensitive.

3966: 314: 3719:

I used only the "peacful revision" term from that source what is exist in every other. Even contemporary USA New York Times use this term:

3120:

Csáky stressed the fact that Hungary had brought about the revision of the Treaty of Trianon “without shedding blood and in a peaceful way”

2676:– but also the general public opinion promoted the idea that in Hungary there must be order, security, organic and continuous development." 2143:

or barely (Carpatho-Ukraine, Slovak-Hungarian war) which was the future but not the time before the negotiation of the First Vienna Award.

1708: 1699:

Hungarian Knowledge (XXG) – "horror-state") I very much think talking about a split, under whatever conditions, is absolutely premature. —

1398: 825:

reference? Given that there are things like precise percentages from censuses, obviously someone has been doing some serious research. --

3652:

The Guardian has interviewed János Rainer, a biographer of Nagy and one of the founding members of the 1956 Institute, who confirms that

3052:

way. Hungarian politicians counted on a long preparatory period, and they were not prepared for a military action against Czechoslovakia"

3845:

Orban created the Veritas institute so that he could purge "disloyal" Hungarian historians, as explained in the Financial Times article

3416:

And who do you think they meant if not the Hungarian government. Explain yourself already. And stop ignoring the context of the article.

1214: 1115: 854: 763: 3107:“We’ll provide you with the arms,” Hitler interrupted. But I adhered to my refusal and even warned him against the risk of a major war, 2816: 1433: 3128:“Ever since the will of the nation put me at the country’s helm, the most important aim of Hungarian foreign policy has been, through 2898: 1679:

b) the article states that there were mass expulsion of teachers, though, Janics argues that according to witnesses most of them left

701:(JM:) We don't use it in English: I don't recall ever seeing it. The usual convention is just to put implied words in square brackets. 2635:

https://hi-storylessons.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Hungary’s-territory-is-revised-after-the-First-Vienna-Award-November-2-1938.pdf

524:"Invoking the negotiations provisions of the Munich Agreement, Hungary demanded that Czechoslovakia begin negotiations by October 1." 44: 32: 4207: 4202: 2846: 2804:

Hungary reluctantly accepted the new reality, but the next twenty years of Hungarian foreign and domestic policy largely aimed at a

2470:

Some sources what I found fast, also I linked Hungarian prime ministers from that era, you can their deeds also in the main article:

1751:"the article states that there were mass expulsion of teachers, though, Janics argues that according to witnesses most of them left 1073: 790: 2282: 2266: 2127: 419:

In the section "Before the negotiations", first paragraph: "Hungary, on the other hand..." The "other hand" compared to what? (JM)

3454:

Seeing as the sentence directly before "some" talked about state sanctioned revisionist propaganda, I think it's clear they meant

2648:

had doubts concerning Germany’s final victory and felt that a world-wide, anti German coalition could bring Germany to its knees."

1297:. That claim is seemed to be written by someone with anti-Ukrainian sentiments. Sich organization was established long before the 3534:

That blog is written by Eva Balogh. One of the academic sources you're yourself using on this page is also written by Eva Balogh.

3479:, a blog (!) that heavily opposes the Orbán government. And qualified historians working at the institution are untrustworthy...? 3982:

Yes, I saw it. Good luck with that, I sensed that this discussion has gotten very heated. I hope it can be resolved peacefully.

3749:. The exact same Eva Balogh that he's now accusing of being financed by George Soros. If this isn't hypocrisy, then what is it? 1142:

I also added a dubious tag for "because Germans did not want to live as a minority under Hungary". Saying two decades after the

772: 391: 305: 266: 1099:

Call my posting what you will, but it is neither pro Hungarian nor pro Slovak, but pro justice based on non-skewed statistics.

76: 3213:

Btw, I found meantime: Slovak historian, Miroslav Michela (in Hungarian but original text was Slovak, use google translator):

3436:"some" who? individual angry Hungarians is not the official government and the text clearly says like other linked sources: 2274: 2258: 2123: 1445: 3056: 2107:

is only five minutes from the border for Czechoslovak aircraft. They would neutralize me before I could get up from my bed"

4192: 3036:"Integral revision was taken off the agenda of the Hungarian government as a plan without any real chance to be realised. 1848:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1314: 3347:

Do you want copy-paste everything? Copyright? Why exactly everything from that source, there are many other added source.

2967: 1503:

There is not any real problem with name (annexation, occupation, whatever), because I agree with neutral term annexation.

387: 2408: 1457: 1441: 3841:

controversial historian Sándor Szakály was appointed in January to direct VERITAS as it crafts its revisionist history.

3671:

controversial historian Sándor Szakály was appointed in January to direct VERITAS as it crafts its revisionist history.

3025:

The situation prompted Hungary to press for Great-Power support for its territorial objectives, where possible seeking

137: 101: 3287:

As you can see, my edit was perfectly fine. It's you who seems to have problems inserting info from your own sources.

1729:"Exaggerates the importance of local atrocities, giving dubious arms to the hands of the anti-Hungarian nationalism." 1657:"Exaggerates the importance of local atrocities, giving dubious arms to the hands of the anti-Hungarian nationalism." 2820:

the Anschluss, it was clear to many in the Hungarian Foreign Ministry and the government in general that the key to

2711:

Hungarian source in Hungarian by Hungarian historian, please use google translator: "Békés úton" means "peacful way"

2345:

Hitler and led to a change in Germany's view of Hungarian territorial demands in eastern Czechoslovakia. Before the

2392: 2061: 1146:

that "Slovakia lost its railways, connections etc." is a bit POV, so a neutral reference is needed for that claim.

789:- And the Trianon Treaty was of course whhat Hungarians deserved for their policy in 1790-1918- what is a problem? 3769:

I see you still engaged to countine personal insults instead of focusing the content. That Soros things is in the

2690: 2332:

started to make an edit war in the subject. The topic is about the First Vienna Award no about the future events.

50: 3877:

After several personal harrasment and naming me a "troll" I see you still countinue and naming me "schizophrenic"

3292:

The same academician wrote an entire article about how VERITAS is soaked in propaganda and inherently unreliable.

3222:"in his writing, he considered this situation dangerous from the point of view of European peace, and proposed a 2658: 3581: 2480:

https://www.nytimes.com/1934/12/09/archives/britain-and-france-move-for-balkan-compromise-as-anger-rises-at.html

2027: 2916:"László Bárdossy, Chargé d’Affaires of the Hungarian Legation in London, made a point of reiterating Hungary’s 1310: 3820:

Boring that I need repeate myself: in our case "peaceful revision" both agreed = the content is more reliable.

2739:

Hungarian source in Hungarian "The text of the First Vienna Award" please use google translator for the page:

2115:

This was the sentence what you changed, even here is "Germany and Italy sought a nonviolent way" in this case:

1870: 82: 2672:." + "And we shouldn't forget the widespread consensus regarding the revision of the Trianon peace dictate – 1218: 1119: 858: 759: 3184:

defines nonviolence as "the personal practice of not causing harm to others under any condition." Likewise,

3177: 2865:

and strictly diplomatic way was considered to be the only solution in the immediate aftermath of the treaty"

2767:

https://kafkadesk.org/2020/11/20/on-this-day-in-1940-hungary-signed-the-tripartite-pact-and-joined-the-axis/

2493:

https://www.nytimes.com/1938/09/29/archives/rumania-feels-relieved-but-hungarian-agitation-for-peaceful.html

2285:…", regarding what Hungary has lost in the Treaty of Trianon. To me, the first question to answer here is: @ 1866: 1569:

György). If Hungarian historians published any other complex work about annexation, it can be added as well.

1466: 1267: 1240: 1200: 1151: 141:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the 3745:

I'd like to remind everyone, that if you scroll up, you'll find OrionNimrod posting a link to Eva Balogh's

1783:"Perhaps no coincidence that the book is still a popular reference among the Slovak nationalist historians" 1660:"Perhaps no coincidence that the book is still a popular reference among the Slovak nationalist historians" 1077: 794: 226: 200: 2787:

https://www.herder-institut.de/digitale-angebote/dokumente-und-materialien/themenmodule/modul/9/seite.html

2715:

https://magyarnemzet.hu/belfold/2021/09/szakaly-sandor-bekes-uton-rendezte-volna-a-reviziot-bethlen-istvan

2668:." +" As a result of the referendum on December 1921, Sopron and eight settlements „remained” in Hungary. 1815: 1704: 1395: 2597: 1555: 1537: 3987: 3952: 3923: 3885: 3828: 3781: 3736: 3571: 3537:

is unreliable and a propaganda institute, you started ignoring her as "just a blog". You're a hypocrite.

3519: 3445: 3407: 3362: 3317: 3269: 3232: 3148: 2928:"The British interest in Hungarian affairs was only to intensify in 1938, shortly before the idea of a ‘ 2427: 2232: 2198: 2151: 2073: 2034: 1997: 1929: 1305:. Sich volunteers created paramilitary organization Carpathian Sich due to the speculated aggression as 1263: 1104: 950:

There is no mention of a proposal of an autonomous Slovakia within Hungary during WWI, wich they denied.

755: 717:

This sentence has no special meaning, it is supposed to mean lack of rule of law or something like that.

313:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

3659:. Here's Atlatszo, a Hungarian investigative journalism nonprofit and a watchdog NGO, also saying that 3069: 2612: 1862: 2824:

enlarging Hungary’s borders was to utilize the idea of national self-determination as the Germans had.

2703: 1100: 1030: 2545: 1943: 1595: 1545: 1474: 3020:, as the military forces of Hungary’s neighbors were an order of magnitude stronger than Hungary’s." 3011:, as the military forces of Hungary’s neighbors were an order of magnitude stronger than Hungary’s." 1171: 64: 38: 2838:

After being shown the frontier around the city of Munkács, Procter noted that “Hungary’s policy of

2542: 2100: 2043:

I started a conversation instead of make edit war game. Relatead talk pages regarding the edits of

461: 3933: 3909: 3895: 3867: 3853: 3846: 3806: 3792: 3764: 3750: 3698: 3683: 3676: 3600: 3554: 3541: 3511: 3472: 3459: 3433: 3420: 3392: 3379: 3342: 3328: 3295: 3257: 3243: 3216: 2513:

in the article: no joining military action and diplomatic field = it means nonviolent as synonyme

2329: 2308: 2247: 2224: 2211: 2190: 2175: 2044: 2008: 1989: 1976: 1905: 1001:

On minor factual issues (date of renaming Subcarpathia), please, just cite a reference and modify.

488:, Poland) a plan prepared by the Hungarian government..." or (2) "...presented a plan prepared in 3974: 3770: 3713: 3705: 3476: 3198: 2939: 2450: 2294: 1830: 1796: 1609: 1579: 1527: 1429: 1236: 1196: 1147: 806: 472:

Or maybe we word more carefully to make it clear we are using names relevant to the period... --

3356:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hungarian_invasion_of_Carpatho-Ukraine&action=history

3290:

Also, I've noticed that another one of your sources is the Hungarian academician Eva S. Balogh.

2875:

and strictly diplomatic means was considered to be the only solution by the Hungarian government

2442: 2083:

deed. Also the Hungarian military was very limited by the Treaty of Trianon to make it impotent.

1951: 1416:

Award (current article) - detailed information about arbitration, preparations, proceedings, etc

1384: 1367: 1355: 3495: 3279: 2574: 1964: 804:

MAy I ask why can a "mud throwing" stay in the article if it has no ground? like the part-: -->

369: 3899: 3857: 3796: 3754: 3687: 3604: 3589: 3545: 3502: 3463: 3424: 3383: 3332: 3299: 3247: 2721: 2684: 2604: 2364: 2333: 2312: 2215: 2179: 2131: 2090: 2012: 1980: 1909: 1811: 1700: 1392: 1235:

The article still has zero Hungarian references, so my almost-year-old comment remains valid.

1143: 1060: 3352:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Soviet_annexation_of_Transcarpathia&action=history

2052:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Carpathian_Ruthenia&diff=prev&oldid=1165060310

1461: 1379: 1363: 3983: 3962: 3948: 3937: 3919: 3881: 3824: 3777: 3732: 3567: 3515: 3441: 3403: 3358: 3313: 3265: 3228: 3144: 3122:

and that she was filled with the desire “to maintain good relations with all her neighbours”

2510: 2423: 2407:

to changing things what I used as evidence in the article. He also rewrote the days however

2354: 2346: 2286: 2228: 2207:

You know I can just keep linking this section? It completely disagrees with your fantasies.

2194: 2147: 2069: 2030: 1993: 1972: 1925: 1898: 1881: 1388: 1290: 1013: 979: 810: 780: 659: 3438:

Hungarian revisionism mainly sought to reclaim the lost territories through peaceful means,

1371: 2615:, former foreign minister and the man responsible for Hungary's first successful revision" 2582:

Hungarian revisionism mainly sought to reclaim the lost territories through peaceful means

2350: 1591: 1565:

notability: notable without any doubts, high impact on mutual relationship until nowadays.

1541: 1470: 1072:

A map is not correct- the Polish occupation of Javorina and parts of Orava is niot shown.

909: 878: 3185: 1137: 3965:

I agree at this point; we're talking about this and the other issues in general over at

3264:

Please stop personal harrasments, and aggressive edit war to exclusively push your POV.

1942:

The first conflict occurred in the early morning of October 5, 1938, when troops of the

281: 260: 3173: 3059:

The Hungarian foreign office, however, continually emphasized that Hungary sought only

2894:

and diplomatic solution, and founded belief in the future adjustment of the frontiers."

1306: 297: 4181: 3970: 3941: 3309: 3207: 3194: 2749: 2645: 2459: 2446: 2322: 2304: 2290: 1884:

here and elsewhere make absolutely no sense and make me question his judgement. See:

1826: 1792: 1605: 1575: 1523: 1453: 1425: 928: 3101:. Hungary had, of course, revisionist claims on Czechoslovakia, I added, but it was 1955: 1735:

It is very easy to compare this claim with the content of the book. He writes about

1604:

The discussion was opened and I am waiting for counterarguments for 3 items above.--

3838: 3709: 3668: 3585: 3498: 3000:

reached through negotiations conducted without mental reservations on either side."

2993:"The purely Hungarian frontier territories must be restored to Hungary by way of a 2270: 2254: 2119: 1561:

size: topic of annexation covers period of 6 years (!) Your link recommends: ": -->

1302: 1301:

to promote a Ukrainian national identity and it had nothing to do with Germans and

1298: 1213:

And since then it was changed quite a few times so I don´t see your point there. --

1056: 887: 440: 2375:

Bilateral negotiations, agreement, fight in the diplomatic field = non violent way

1181:"this is actually a clearly pro-Hungarian (anti-Slovak) article." The article has 113: 95: 3087:

that Hungary had shown her willingness to revise her frontiers by peaceful means.

3704:

you can list all sources in the world which critize Orban government. And? That

3181: 2800: 1026: 1009: 965: 846: 826: 776: 724: 599: 582: 570: 514: 493: 473: 466: 412: 123: 2942:"the Peace Treaty of Trianon by the assertion of our just rights and solely by 2691:

https://www.visegradgroup.eu/basic-facts-about/hungary/brief-history-of-hungary

2531:

instead and to push for territorial revision in the spirit of Munich Agreement.

2139:

topic is about the background before the negotiation of the First Vienna Award.

1440:

Beside this page (First Vienna Award) we already have quite a lot of articles (

214: 189: 3378:

expect to lose, since Knowledge (XXG) doesn't tolerate highly biased sources.

2659:

https://magyarnemzet.hu/english/2021/04/getting-back-on-our-feet-after-trianon

2422:

problem for him to write ""Soviet union won land" which is about the article.

2144: 936: 287: 129: 119: 2954:"and to influence popular feeling in the victorious countries in favour of a 1654:" selects the historical materials on the purpose to denounce the Hungarians" 3991: 3977: 3956: 3927: 3903: 3889: 3861: 3832: 3800: 3785: 3758: 3740: 3691: 3608: 3593: 3575: 3549: 3523: 3506: 3467: 3449: 3428: 3411: 3387: 3366: 3336: 3321: 3303: 3273: 3251: 3236: 3201: 3152: 2763:

On this Day, in 1940: Hungary signed the Tripartite Pact and joined the Axis

2453: 2431: 2316: 2297: 2236: 2219: 2202: 2183: 2155: 2077: 2038: 2016: 2001: 1984: 1933: 1913: 1834: 1819: 1800: 1613: 1599: 1583: 1549: 1531: 1478: 1318: 1271: 1244: 1222: 1204: 1189: 1175: 1167: 1155: 1123: 1108: 1081: 1064: 1034: 1016: 968: 912: 894: 891: 881: 862: 839: 814: 798: 783: 739: 736: 574: 538: 504: 452: 2890:"A certain “legal mechanism”95 seemed to provide a viable foundation for a 1825:(e.g. if somebody proves opposite based on new documents) and real state.-- 53:

when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

1309:

was dissolving. The claim of German tutelage is baseless and provocative.

3712:, and you can collect all sources in the world which critize Soros. And? 3580:

I think you've mistaken me for OrionNimrod. Nevertheless you should read

2104: 1185:

Hungarian references at this point, while several Slovak ones are listed.

2670:

This was the first successful, peaceful revision of the Trianon borders

310: 3486:

What about this version? (Sadecki's version's first sentence modified)

2598:

http://efolyoirat.oszk.hu/00000/00010/00008/pdf/HSR_1983_1_043-051.pdf

2208: 877:

Vienna Arbitration? Would mention of it be helpful in this article?

2695:

No violance (military things) between Trianon and First Vienna Award.

2126:

had sought a nonviolent way to support the territorial claims of the

489: 485: 481: 480:"...presented a plan prepared by the Hungarian government in Poland ( 3458:

by "some" and not "individual angry hungarians" as you're claiming.

2325:, I see this info is a long time in the article, this is from 2008: 1362:, not a policy or guideline. For opposition to splitting, they were 3847:

which talks about the destruction of the 1956 Institute by Veritas.

2829:

the long-awaited miracle has come to pass: Hungary’s territory has

2704:

https://www.visegradgroup.eu/roundtables-debates/the-trianon-trauma

484:)..." I guess that this means either to say (1) "... presented (in 3918:

in other topic you are not willing to answer regarding your edit.

2546:

https://ojs.bibl.u-szeged.hu/index.php/chronica/article/view/10771

1469:) because those Czecho-Slovak lands became Hungarian territories. 1289:

The article states that Sich organization was created throughout

3839:"Under the watchful eye of Orbán’s chief of staff, János Lázár, 3669:"Under the watchful eye of Orbán’s chief of staff, János Lázár, 2543:

http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/5876/1/chronica_009_010_224-227.pdf

3813: 3217:

https://epa.oszk.hu/00000/00033/00015/szemle_2003_4_michela.htm

3103:

our wish and intention to press those claims by peaceful means.

3077:

Hungary’s demand of the peaceful return to her historic borders

4164:

tags on this page, but the references will not show without a

3584:

and stop using this insulting way of communication on anyone!

2849:"Hungary’s role in international politics and the question of 1540:. You should first ask other Knowledge (XXG) editors about it. 1136:

I'm asking for inline citations as too many claims seem to be

955:

Subcarpatia was renamed to Carpatho-Ukraine on March 15, 1939.

364: 142: 58: 15: 2666:

the revision must be achieved not through war, but peacefully

990:

What about Panslavism do you think has bearing on the matter?

3496:

https://www.osw.waw.pl/sites/default/files/PV_EN_Trianon.pdf

2575:

https://www.osw.waw.pl/sites/default/files/PV_EN_Trianon.pdf

1946:

crossed the border and attacked Czechoslovak positions near

1574:

Your arguments are not very strong, do you have any other?--

923:

It has no hungarian references, only from the other side(s).

368: 3667:. Here's the Foreign Policy Research Institute saying that 2752:

was sure that the planned revision steps could be resolved

3912:, please stop personal harrasments, I asked several times. 3071:

I think this book is itself a good evidence for the issue:

2901:"Even Gömbös made a habit of emphasising that he aimed at 2209:

https://en.wikipedia.org/First_Vienna_Award#Nullification

1674:

Hungarian-Slovak or Slovak schools than Slovak nationals.

3180:; you can see that in accordance with that, the article 2756:

so he did not consider German support necessary either."

2404:

Here he started to rewrote the article to fit his taste

1650:

In general, he characterizes the book as the following:

4049: 4047: 3916: 3878: 3355: 3351: 2405: 2387: 2326: 2051: 1894: 1891: 1888: 1885: 1262:

bias on his entries so why do these remain available? (

3529:"a blog (!) that heavily opposes the Orbán government" 3113:

István Csáky, Minister of Foreign Affairs (1938-1941):

2519:

Hungary's not joining with Germany in military actions

2417:

Talk:Soviet annexation of Transcarpathia#Czecoslovakia

2067:

Talk:Soviet annexation of Transcarpathia#Czecoslovakia

1938:

The following text are direct quotes from the article:

4092: 4090: 4088: 3661:

Veritas is in the business of historical revisionism.

3172:"Nonviolent" puts people in the mind of figures like 1378:. This was an old proposal, but it may be time for a 1004:

Poland's requests: no idea what you are referring to.

3701:

watchdog NGO :D this goes very far from the topic...

2527:"Therefore, Hungary decided to fight Czechoslovakia 1339:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

771:

Writing anonymously does not provide a free pass on

309:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 4114: 4112: 2642:

armed neutrality and a peaceful revision of borders

171:This article has not yet received a rating on the 3663:Here's the Brookings Institution calling Veritas 1664:He also shows at certain inaccuracies, regarding 3566:other sources not the details from that source. 2485:"Italy Supports Hungary Urges Peaceful Revision" 1374:issues that is contributing to the consensus of 224:, a project which is currently considered to be 2655:Interview with a respected Hungarian historian: 1852: 960:the Munich Agreement ignored Poland's requests 3747:Peaceful Revision: The Diplomatic Road to War 2593:Peaceful Revision: The Diplomatic Road to War 1342:A summary of the conclusions reached follows. 8: 1040:Lost infrastructure + removed POV statements 4077:sfn error: no target: CITEREFČaplovič2008 ( 4036:sfn error: no target: CITEREFČaplovič2008 ( 2833:been enlarged. –Béla Imrédy, Prime Minister 2500:Hungarian Agitation for 'Peaceful Revision' 2399:Talk:Hungarian invasion of Carpatho-Ukraine 2145:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkj_wq4qZME 2057:Talk:Hungarian invasion of Carpatho-Ukraine 1285:Sich as German collaborational organization 4058:sfn error: no target: CITEREFChorvát2008 ( 2622:peaceful solution of territorial questions 255: 236:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Eastern Europe 184: 90: 3099:no possibility of Hungarian participation 2607:, the chief architect of the doctrine of 1861:accept the results.|date=November 2015}} 1857:Anybody able to fix the following chaos? 1853:Germany's position before the arbitration 1460:etc. ) about the period. We should avoid 4223:Knowledge (XXG) requested maps in Europe 4072: 4031: 2580:"While some called for military action, 2553:a peaceful revision was their conception 1195:So I don't understand your frustration. 662:? or is it a vocational school? or what? 4142:sfn error: no target: CITEREFDeák2008 ( 4123:sfn error: no target: CITEREFDeák2008 ( 4101:sfn error: no target: CITEREFDeák1991 ( 4053: 4024: 2441:, so we need to be extra-careful about 873:When and in what circumstances was the 257: 186: 92: 62: 3483:you added so that has to be separated. 2562:the possibility of a peaceful revision 2024:Hungarian invasion of Carpatho-Ukraine 2007:to voice their opinion on the matter. 939:also not mentioned, just magyarization 2856:were the main topics for discussion." 2328:nobody had a problem with this until 1629:As of its current state I definitely 836:And thank you for help and patience. 7: 4188:Knowledge (XXG) controversial topics 4137: 4118: 4096: 2047:who started to change several pages. 1333:The following discussion is closed. 1324:Life in the annexed territory -: --> 303:This article is within the scope of 220:This article is within the scope of 135:This article is within the scope of 4156: 2097:Some days before the Vienna Award: 1450:Slovaks in Czechoslovakia (1918–38) 773:Knowledge (XXG):No personal attacks 323:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Hungary 239:Template:WikiProject Eastern Europe 145:and the subjects encompassed by it. 81:It is of interest to the following 3085:"A yet more important outcome was 2393:Talk:Hungarians in Ukraine#Borders 2279:sought a nonviolent way to support 2062:Talk:Hungarians in Ukraine#Borders 900:Propose Featured-Article candidacy 14: 2687:website, brief history of Hungary 2611:and himself a Transylvanian, and 2555:with Italy's diplomatic support." 2489:New York times article from 1938: 2476:New York times article from 1934: 1358:as a rule, which it really is an 1132:POV problems, no inline citations 3679:with the following text quoted: 3677:here's a Financial Times article 2099:Horthy declared to Polish Envoy 1844:The discussion above is closed. 290: 280: 259: 213: 188: 122: 112: 94: 63: 19: 4213:Low-importance Hungary articles 4198:Unknown-importance law articles 3126:Horthy’s Proclamation in 1944: 1975:considers to be "non-violent". 1967:and damaged railway facilities. 530:or does it mean something else? 343:This article has been rated as 151:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Law 43:Content must be written from a 27:The subject of this article is 2730:the revision in a peaceful way 2281:the territorial claims of the 2265:the territorial claims of the 1017:18:31, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 969:11:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 886:Maybe you have overlooked the 863:17:05, 23 September 2011 (UTC) 1: 4218:All WikiProject Hungary pages 2624:between Rumania and Hungary." 2498:"Rumania Feels Relieved; But 1272:02:30, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 1245:18:31, 13 December 2009 (UTC) 1156:15:23, 22 February 2009 (UTC) 1082:17:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 799:17:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 784:05:59, 22 November 2005 (UTC) 317:and see a list of open tasks. 3814:https://veritasintezet.hu/en 3665:"Orbán’s partisan Institute" 2726:the revision in peaceful way 2409:Second Czechoslovak Republic 2340:It is itself in the article: 1458:Second Czechoslovak Republic 1442:Slovakia during World War II 1223:18:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC) 1109:08:07, 7 February 2012 (UTC) 740:18:52, 28 October 2005 (UTC) 573:04:11, Aug 21, 2004 (UTC) / 326:Template:WikiProject Hungary 3043:became a slogan from 1928." 2246:Hello, here to give a 3O. @ 2130:, and revision of the 1920 1950:with the goal of capturing 1370:. Proposer might have some 1319:16:34, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 1188:The article was created by 37:When updating the article, 4239: 3193:of that we can get. 🍉◜⠢◞ↂ 2796:was repeatedly emphasized" 2631:Hungarian academic source: 2539:Hungarian academic source: 1400:02:15, 17 April 2020 (UTC) 1205:06:30, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 1124:06:14, 10 March 2015 (UTC) 869:Second Vienna Arbitration? 849:04:31, Aug 23, 2004 (UTC) 829:01:50, Aug 22, 2004 (UTC) 727:03:17, Aug 22, 2004 (UTC) 585:19:51, Aug 21, 2004 (UTC) 517:04:11, Aug 21, 2004 (UTC) 476:06:30, Aug 20, 2004 (UTC) 469:04:54, Aug 20, 2004 (UTC) 415:00:43, Aug 20, 2004 (UTC) 349:project's importance scale 222:WikiProject Eastern Europe 173:project's importance scale 3992:12:40, 18 July 2023 (UTC) 3978:03:48, 18 July 2023 (UTC) 3957:19:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC) 3928:15:59, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3904:15:55, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3890:15:52, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3862:15:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3833:15:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3801:15:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3786:15:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3759:14:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3741:14:29, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3692:14:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3609:13:59, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3594:13:55, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3576:13:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3550:13:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3524:13:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3507:13:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3468:13:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3450:13:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3429:13:00, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3412:12:51, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3388:12:38, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3367:12:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3337:12:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3322:12:26, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3304:12:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3274:12:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3252:11:37, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3237:10:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3202:00:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC) 3153:20:05, 15 July 2023 (UTC) 2646:Prime Minister Pál Teleki 2454:13:49, 15 July 2023 (UTC) 2432:13:09, 15 July 2023 (UTC) 2317:11:22, 15 July 2023 (UTC) 2298:10:54, 15 July 2023 (UTC) 2237:21:24, 14 July 2023 (UTC) 2220:16:59, 14 July 2023 (UTC) 2203:16:13, 14 July 2023 (UTC) 2184:14:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC) 2156:09:48, 14 July 2023 (UTC) 2078:17:27, 13 July 2023 (UTC) 2039:16:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC) 2017:16:36, 13 July 2023 (UTC) 2002:16:08, 13 July 2023 (UTC) 1985:16:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC) 1934:15:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC) 1914:15:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC) 1880:The recent edits done by 1835:16:08, 10 July 2014 (UTC) 1820:11:06, 10 July 2014 (UTC) 1636:the Guild of Copy Editors 1556:Knowledge (XXG):Splitting 1538:Knowledge (XXG):Splitting 1446:Slovak Republic (1939–45) 1176:15:34, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 1065:17:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1035:18:00, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 845:It's been a pleasure. -- 842:02:25, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC) 815:10:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC) 602:02:03, Aug 22, 2004 (UTC) 577:13:24, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC) 496:06:39, Aug 20, 2004 (UTC) 455:01:46, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC) 342: 275: 208: 170: 107: 89: 39:be bold, but not reckless 4208:B-Class Hungary articles 4203:WikiProject Law articles 3226:of the Trianon borders." 1846:Please do not modify it. 1801:04:35, 9 July 2014 (UTC) 1710:23:40, 8 July 2014 (UTC) 1614:16:39, 8 July 2014 (UTC) 1600:15:37, 8 July 2014 (UTC) 1584:14:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC) 1550:13:53, 8 July 2014 (UTC) 1532:15:01, 7 July 2014 (UTC) 1479:09:49, 7 July 2014 (UTC) 1435:21:44, 6 July 2014 (UTC) 1336:Please do not modify it. 913:11:22, 22 May 2005 (UTC) 895:16:30, 20 May 2005 (UTC) 882:08:41, 20 May 2005 (UTC) 507:13:03, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC) 154:Template:WikiProject Law 4162:<ref group=note: --> 3456:"some in the the state" 3178:Martin Luther King, Jr. 2674:if possible, peacefully 2529:in the diplomatic field 1871:22:51, 9 May 2022 (UTC) 1467:Hungary in World War II 378:It is requested that a 242:Eastern Europe articles 4166:{{reflist|group=note}} 2842:will surely continue,” 2811:of the Trianon Treaty. 2050:This was simple math: 374: 71:This article is rated 31:and content may be in 397:Wikipedians in Europe 372: 75:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 45:neutral point of view 4193:B-Class law articles 3280:this source you used 3278:The full quote from 3224:non-violent revision 2935:’ became a reality." 2724:would have arranged 2028:Slovak–Hungarian War 1944:Royal Hungarian Army 1688:and the "evacuation" 1554:Let's look on rules 753:comment was added by 399:may be able to help! 3967:WikiProject Hungary 2794:a peaceful revision 2464:"peaceful revision" 2439:controversial issue 2337:would be incorrect? 1779:archive materials. 1346:The result of this 1311:Aleksandr Grigoryev 918:disputed neutrality 462:Carpathian Ruthenia 392:improve its quality 390:in this article to 306:WikiProject Hungary 4168:template (see the 3771:Hungarian Spectrum 3714:Hungarian Spectrum 3706:Hungarian Spectrum 3477:Hungarian Spectrum 3061:peaceful revision. 2509:Slovak historian, 2283:Kingdom of Hungary 2267:Kingdom of Hungary 2128:Kingdom of Hungary 2086:From the article: 1709:_New_article": --> 1434:_New_article": --> 1412:Proposed content: 1399:_New_article": --> 1360:informational page 1350:discussion was to 931:are not mentioned. 375: 77:content assessment 3817:political view... 3130:peaceful revision 2840:peaceful revision 2609:peaceful revision 2365:Czechoslovak Army 2334:Treaty of Trianon 2132:Treaty of Trianon 2091:Czechoslovak Army 1295:"German tutelage" 1144:Treaty of Trianon 1138:original research 767: 503:(1) of course :) 403: 402: 363: 362: 359: 358: 355: 354: 254: 253: 250: 249: 183: 182: 179: 178: 57: 56: 4230: 4175: 4174: 4173: 4167: 4163: 4148: 4147: 4135: 4129: 4128: 4116: 4107: 4106: 4094: 4083: 4082: 4070: 4064: 4063: 4051: 4042: 4041: 4029: 2640:"An advocate of 2603:"Prime Minister 2355:Benito Mussolini 2347:Munich Agreement 1863:Dr. Martin Fleck 1338: 1291:Carpatho-Ukraine 746: 660:secondary modern 365: 331: 330: 329:Hungary articles 327: 324: 321: 300: 295: 294: 293: 284: 277: 276: 271: 263: 256: 244: 243: 240: 237: 234: 217: 210: 209: 204: 192: 185: 159: 158: 155: 152: 149: 132: 127: 126: 116: 109: 108: 98: 91: 74: 68: 67: 59: 23: 22: 16: 4238: 4237: 4233: 4232: 4231: 4229: 4228: 4227: 4178: 4177: 4165: 4161: 4159: 4157: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4141: 4136: 4132: 4122: 4117: 4110: 4100: 4095: 4086: 4076: 4071: 4067: 4057: 4052: 4045: 4035: 4030: 4026: 3582:WP:AVOIDUNCIVIL 3186:Merriam-Webster 2861:"Revision in a 2351:Sudeten Germans 1952:Rimavská Sobota 1878: 1855: 1850: 1849: 1755:the annexation" 1645:Irodalmi Szemle 1407: 1385:s p l i t 1349: 1334: 1327: 1287: 1190:a Slovak editor 1163: 1134: 1042: 920: 902: 871: 822: 658:like a British 408: 328: 325: 322: 319: 318: 296: 291: 289: 269: 241: 238: 235: 232: 231: 198: 156: 153: 150: 147: 146: 138:WikiProject Law 128: 121: 72: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4236: 4234: 4226: 4225: 4220: 4215: 4210: 4205: 4200: 4195: 4190: 4180: 4179: 4155: 4150: 4149: 4130: 4108: 4084: 4065: 4043: 4023: 4022: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4011: 4010: 4009: 4008: 4007: 4006: 4005: 4004: 4003: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3944: 3913: 3875: 3872: 3821: 3818: 3809: 3774: 3767: 3729: 3725: 3717: 3702: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3578: 3563: 3538: 3531: 3509: 3493: 3487: 3484: 3480: 3417: 3399: 3396: 3375: 3372: 3348: 3345: 3339: 3288: 3262: 3219: 3214: 3211: 3190: 3174:Mahatma Gandhi 3169: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3124: 3114: 3111: 3094: 3091: 3082: 3072: 3064: 3054: 3045: 3031: 3022: 3013: 3002: 2990: 2978: 2963: 2961:of the Treaty" 2951: 2937: 2925: 2913: 2896: 2887: 2878: 2867: 2858: 2844: 2835: 2826: 2814: 2798: 2789: 2784: 2781: 2778: 2769: 2764: 2761: 2758: 2745: 2740: 2737: 2734: 2722:István Bethlen 2717: 2712: 2709: 2706: 2701: 2696: 2693: 2688: 2685:Visegrád Group 2681: 2678: 2661: 2656: 2653: 2650: 2637: 2632: 2629: 2626: 2617: 2605:Istvan Bethlen 2600: 2595: 2589: 2586: 2577: 2572: 2571:Polish source: 2569: 2566: 2557: 2548: 2540: 2537: 2534: 2524: 2514: 2507: 2504: 2495: 2490: 2487: 2482: 2477: 2474: 2471: 2468: 2419: 2413: 2402: 2395: 2389: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2373: 2359: 2341: 2338: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2140: 2136: 2116: 2113: 2109: 2095: 2084: 2064: 2059: 2054: 2048: 1969: 1960: 1939: 1921: 1877: 1874: 1854: 1851: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1804: 1803: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1776: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1744: 1741: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1696: 1695: 1690: 1689: 1685: 1684: 1683:the annexation 1676: 1675: 1670: 1669: 1662: 1661: 1658: 1655: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1566: 1563: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1421: 1420: 1417: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1393:Can I Log In's 1347: 1329: 1328: 1326: 1322: 1307:Czechoslovakia 1286: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1208: 1207: 1193: 1186: 1162: 1159: 1141: 1133: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1096: 1095: 1090: 1089: 1041: 1038: 1006: 1005: 1002: 999: 995: 991: 988: 976: 962: 961: 957: 956: 952: 951: 947: 946: 941: 940: 933: 932: 925: 924: 919: 916: 901: 898: 870: 867: 821: 818: 803: 787: 786: 766:) 21 Nov 2005. 749:The preceding 730: 721: 720: 719: 718: 712: 711: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 692: 691: 687: 686: 685: 684: 678: 677: 673: 672: 671: 670: 664: 663: 651: 650: 646: 645: 644: 643: 636: 635: 627: 626: 625: 624: 618: 617: 613: 612: 611: 610: 604: 603: 595: 594: 593: 592: 568: 567: 563: 562: 558: 557: 553: 552: 548: 547: 543: 542: 534: 533: 532: 531: 528: 525: 511: 510: 509: 508: 498: 497: 437: 436: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 407: 404: 401: 400: 395: 376: 361: 360: 357: 356: 353: 352: 345:Low-importance 341: 335: 334: 332: 315:the discussion 302: 301: 298:Hungary portal 285: 273: 272: 270:Low‑importance 264: 252: 251: 248: 247: 245: 233:Eastern Europe 218: 206: 205: 196:Eastern Europe 193: 181: 180: 177: 176: 169: 163: 162: 160: 134: 133: 117: 105: 104: 99: 87: 86: 80: 69: 55: 54: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4235: 4224: 4221: 4219: 4216: 4214: 4211: 4209: 4206: 4204: 4201: 4199: 4196: 4194: 4191: 4189: 4186: 4185: 4183: 4176: 4171: 4145: 4139: 4134: 4131: 4126: 4120: 4115: 4113: 4109: 4104: 4098: 4093: 4091: 4089: 4085: 4080: 4074: 4073:Čaplovič 2008 4069: 4066: 4061: 4055: 4050: 4048: 4044: 4039: 4033: 4032:Čaplovič 2008 4028: 4025: 4021: 3993: 3989: 3985: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3976: 3972: 3968: 3964: 3960: 3959: 3958: 3954: 3950: 3945: 3943: 3939: 3935: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3925: 3921: 3917: 3914: 3911: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3901: 3897: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3887: 3883: 3879: 3876: 3873: 3869: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3859: 3855: 3852: 3848: 3844: 3842: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3830: 3826: 3822: 3819: 3815: 3810: 3808: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3798: 3794: 3789: 3788: 3787: 3783: 3779: 3775: 3772: 3768: 3766: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3756: 3752: 3748: 3744: 3743: 3742: 3738: 3734: 3730: 3726: 3723: 3721: 3718: 3715: 3711: 3707: 3703: 3700: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3682: 3678: 3675:And finally, 3674: 3672: 3666: 3662: 3658: 3655: 3610: 3606: 3602: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3591: 3587: 3583: 3579: 3577: 3573: 3569: 3564: 3561: 3556: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3547: 3543: 3539: 3535: 3532: 3530: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3521: 3517: 3513: 3510: 3508: 3504: 3500: 3497: 3494: 3492: 3488: 3485: 3481: 3478: 3474: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3465: 3461: 3457: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3447: 3443: 3439: 3435: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3409: 3405: 3400: 3397: 3394: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3376: 3373: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3364: 3360: 3357: 3353: 3349: 3346: 3344: 3340: 3338: 3334: 3330: 3325: 3324: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3306: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3286: 3281: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3227: 3225: 3220: 3218: 3215: 3212: 3209: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3200: 3196: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3175: 3170: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3133: 3131: 3125: 3123: 3121: 3115: 3112: 3110: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3095: 3092: 3090: 3088: 3083: 3080: 3078: 3073: 3070: 3068: 3065: 3063: 3062: 3057: 3055: 3053: 3051: 3046: 3044: 3042: 3039: 3034: 3032: 3030: 3028: 3023: 3021: 3019: 3014: 3012: 3010: 3005: 3003: 3001: 2999: 2996: 2991: 2989: 2987: 2984: 2979: 2977: 2975: 2972: 2968: 2966:1936 journal 2964: 2962: 2960: 2957: 2952: 2950: 2948: 2945: 2940: 2938: 2936: 2934: 2931: 2926: 2924: 2922: 2919: 2914: 2912: 2910: 2907: 2904: 2899: 2897: 2895: 2893: 2888: 2886: 2884: 2879: 2876: 2874: 2868: 2866: 2864: 2859: 2857: 2855: 2852: 2847: 2845: 2843: 2841: 2836: 2834: 2832: 2827: 2825: 2823: 2818: 2815: 2812: 2810: 2807: 2801: 2799: 2797: 2795: 2790: 2788: 2785: 2782: 2779: 2777: 2775: 2770: 2768: 2765: 2762: 2759: 2757: 2755: 2751: 2746: 2744: 2741: 2738: 2735: 2733: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2718: 2716: 2713: 2710: 2707: 2705: 2702: 2700: 2697: 2694: 2692: 2689: 2686: 2682: 2679: 2677: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2662: 2660: 2657: 2654: 2651: 2649: 2647: 2643: 2638: 2636: 2633: 2630: 2627: 2625: 2623: 2618: 2616: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2601: 2599: 2596: 2594: 2590: 2587: 2585: 2583: 2578: 2576: 2573: 2570: 2567: 2565: 2563: 2558: 2556: 2554: 2549: 2547: 2544: 2541: 2538: 2535: 2532: 2530: 2525: 2522: 2520: 2515: 2512: 2511:Ladislav Deák 2508: 2505: 2503: 2501: 2496: 2494: 2491: 2488: 2486: 2483: 2481: 2478: 2475: 2472: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2420: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2403: 2400: 2396: 2394: 2390: 2388: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2374: 2372: 2368: 2366: 2360: 2358: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2342: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2324: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2275:Fascist Italy 2272: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2259:Fascist Italy 2256: 2251: 2249: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2210: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2146: 2141: 2137: 2135: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2124:Fascist Italy 2121: 2117: 2114: 2110: 2108: 2106: 2102: 2101:Leon Orłowski 2096: 2094: 2092: 2085: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2068: 2065: 2063: 2060: 2058: 2055: 2053: 2049: 2046: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2029: 2025: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2005: 2004: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1971:This is what 1970: 1968: 1966: 1961: 1959: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1940: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1922: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1902: 1900: 1896: 1893: 1890: 1887: 1883: 1876:"Non-violent" 1875: 1873: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1858: 1847: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1789: 1784: 1781: 1780: 1777: 1773: 1768: 1765: 1764: 1761: 1756: 1752: 1749: 1748: 1745: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1727: 1726: 1723: 1719: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1706: 1702: 1692: 1691: 1687: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1677: 1672: 1671: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1659: 1656: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1648: 1646: 1640: 1637: 1632: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1590: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1567: 1564: 1560: 1559: 1557: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1454:Vienna Awards 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1431: 1427: 1418: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1410: 1401: 1397: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1383: 1382: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1340: 1337: 1331: 1330: 1323: 1321: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1284: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1264:Stratfordbaby 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1237:Squash Racket 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1215:89.173.16.241 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1197:Squash Racket 1194: 1191: 1187: 1184: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1160: 1158: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1148:Squash Racket 1145: 1139: 1131: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1116:95.105.162.54 1112: 1111: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1097: 1092: 1091: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1070: 1067: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1052: 1048: 1047: 1039: 1037: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1023: 1019: 1018: 1015: 1011: 1003: 1000: 996: 992: 989: 986: 981: 980:Beneš decrees 977: 973: 972: 971: 970: 967: 959: 958: 954: 953: 949: 948: 943: 942: 938: 935: 934: 930: 929:Benes decrees 927: 926: 922: 921: 917: 915: 914: 911: 907: 899: 897: 896: 893: 889: 884: 883: 880: 876: 868: 866: 864: 860: 856: 855:128.97.244.23 850: 848: 843: 841: 837: 834: 830: 828: 819: 817: 816: 812: 808: 801: 800: 796: 792: 785: 782: 778: 774: 770: 769: 768: 765: 761: 757: 756:195.56.50.209 754: 752: 742: 741: 738: 733: 728: 726: 716: 715: 714: 713: 709: 708: 700: 699: 696: 695: 694: 693: 689: 688: 682: 681: 680: 679: 675: 674: 668: 667: 666: 665: 661: 657: 653: 652: 648: 647: 640: 639: 638: 637: 633: 632: 631: 622: 621: 620: 619: 615: 614: 608: 607: 606: 605: 601: 597: 596: 590: 589: 588: 587: 586: 584: 578: 576: 572: 565: 564: 560: 559: 555: 554: 550: 549: 545: 544: 540: 536: 535: 529: 526: 523: 522: 520: 519: 518: 516: 506: 502: 501: 500: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 478: 477: 475: 470: 468: 464: 463: 456: 454: 448: 444: 442: 434: 433: 425: 424: 421: 420: 418: 417: 416: 414: 405: 398: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 371: 367: 366: 350: 346: 340: 337: 336: 333: 316: 312: 308: 307: 299: 288: 286: 283: 279: 278: 274: 268: 265: 262: 258: 246: 229: 228: 223: 219: 216: 212: 211: 207: 202: 197: 194: 191: 187: 174: 168: 165: 164: 161: 144: 140: 139: 131: 125: 120: 118: 115: 111: 110: 106: 103: 100: 97: 93: 88: 84: 78: 70: 66: 61: 60: 52: 48: 46: 40: 36: 34: 30: 29:controversial 25: 18: 17: 4158:Cite error: 4154: 4133: 4068: 4054:Chorvát 2008 4027: 4019: 3971:🄜𝚎sₒᶜa𝚛🅟 3850: 3840: 3746: 3710:George Soros 3708:financed by 3680: 3670: 3653: 3651: 3533: 3528: 3489: 3455: 3437: 3283: 3223: 3221: 3195:🄜𝚎sₒᶜa𝚛🅟 3143: 3142: 3129: 3127: 3119: 3116: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3096: 3086: 3084: 3076: 3074: 3060: 3058: 3049: 3047: 3040: 3037: 3035: 3026: 3024: 3017: 3015: 3008: 3006: 2997: 2994: 2992: 2985: 2982: 2980: 2973: 2970: 2965: 2958: 2955: 2953: 2946: 2943: 2941: 2932: 2929: 2927: 2920: 2917: 2915: 2908: 2905: 2903:‘revision by 2902: 2900: 2891: 2889: 2882: 2880: 2872: 2871:Revision by 2870: 2862: 2860: 2853: 2850: 2848: 2839: 2837: 2830: 2828: 2821: 2819: 2808: 2805: 2803: 2793: 2791: 2773: 2771: 2753: 2747: 2729: 2725: 2719: 2698: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2663: 2641: 2639: 2621: 2619: 2613:Kalman Kanya 2608: 2602: 2592: 2581: 2579: 2561: 2559: 2552: 2550: 2528: 2526: 2518: 2516: 2499: 2497: 2484: 2463: 2447:🄜𝚎sₒᶜa𝚛🅟 2369: 2361: 2343: 2291:🄜𝚎sₒᶜa𝚛🅟 2278: 2271:Nazi Germany 2262: 2255:Nazi Germany 2252: 2245: 2172: 2120:Nazi Germany 2118: 2098: 2087: 1962: 1941: 1903: 1879: 1859: 1856: 1845: 1812:Thehoboclown 1782: 1766: 1754: 1750: 1736: 1728: 1717: 1701:Thehoboclown 1697: 1680: 1663: 1649: 1644: 1641: 1630: 1628: 1588: 1422: 1411: 1408: 1380: 1376:not to split 1375: 1359: 1351: 1341: 1335: 1332: 1303:Nazi Germany 1299:World War II 1294: 1288: 1182: 1164: 1161:POV problems 1135: 1071: 1068: 1053: 1049: 1044: 1043: 1024: 1020: 1007: 984: 963: 905: 903: 888:Vienna Award 885: 874: 872: 851: 844: 838: 835: 831: 823: 802: 788: 748: 743: 734: 729: 722: 655: 628: 579: 569: 512: 471: 460: 457: 449: 445: 441:Subcarpathia 438: 409: 396: 383: 379: 344: 304: 225: 157:law articles 136: 83:WikiProjects 42: 26: 3984:CriticKende 3963:CriticKende 3949:CriticKende 3938:OrionNimrod 3920:OrionNimrod 3882:OrionNimrod 3825:OrionNimrod 3778:OrionNimrod 3733:OrionNimrod 3568:OrionNimrod 3516:OrionNimrod 3442:OrionNimrod 3404:OrionNimrod 3359:OrionNimrod 3314:OrionNimrod 3266:OrionNimrod 3229:OrionNimrod 3182:Nonviolence 3145:OrionNimrod 2885:means only" 2754:peacefully, 2424:OrionNimrod 2287:OrionNimrod 2229:OrionNimrod 2195:OrionNimrod 2148:OrionNimrod 2070:OrionNimrod 2031:OrionNimrod 1994:OrionNimrod 1973:OrionNimrod 1926:OrionNimrod 1899:OrionNimrod 1882:OrionNimrod 1668:the schools 1396:(talk) page 1325:New article 1101:Prussia1231 1074:84.16.37.74 791:84.16.37.74 143:legal field 4182:Categories 4160:There are 4020:References 3849:To quote: 2831:peacefully 2822:peacefully 2783:In German: 2502:Is Feared" 2379:logically. 1958:(Párkány). 1737:systematic 1592:Fakirbakir 1542:Fakirbakir 1471:Fakirbakir 998:occurred". 985:vice versa 937:Panslavism 910:logologist 890:article... 879:logologist 656:Realschule 373:Map needed 130:Law portal 4170:help page 4138:Deák 2008 4119:Deák 2008 4099:, p. 150. 4097:Deák 1991 3975:𔑪‎talk〗⇤ 3199:𔑪‎talk〗⇤ 2921:ambitions 2683:Official 2451:𔑪‎talk〗⇤ 2443:synthesis 2295:𔑪‎talk〗⇤ 2263:supported 1965:Borozhava 1424:itself.-- 1352:not split 539:8 October 406:Copy edit 51:citations 4140:, p. 10. 4075:, p. 62. 4056:, p. 58. 4034:, p. 51. 3973:ම𛱘‎🥑《 3969:. 🍉◜⠢◞ↂ 3942:Mesocarp 3915:However 3656:Source: 3310:Mesocarp 3208:Mesocarp 3197:ම𛱘‎🥑《 3050:peaceful 3041:revision 3038:Peaceful 3027:peaceful 3018:peaceful 3009:peaceful 2998:revision 2995:peaceful 2983:peaceful 2971:peaceful 2959:revision 2956:peaceful 2944:peaceful 2933:revision 2930:peaceful 2918:peaceful 2906:peaceful 2892:peaceful 2883:peaceful 2873:peaceful 2863:peaceful 2854:revision 2851:peaceful 2809:revision 2806:peaceful 2460:Mesocarp 2449:ම𛱘‎🥑《 2323:Mesocarp 2305:Mesocarp 2293:ම𛱘‎🥑《 2105:Budapest 1948:Jesenské 1827:Ditinili 1793:Ditinili 1606:Ditinili 1576:Ditinili 1524:Ditinili 1426:Ditinili 1372:civility 1356:WP:SPLIT 994:German). 764:contribs 751:unsigned 388:included 227:inactive 201:inactive 49:Include 4121:, p. 9. 3934:Azure94 3910:Azure94 3896:Azure94 3868:Azure94 3854:Azure94 3807:Azure94 3793:Azure94 3765:Azure94 3751:Azure94 3699:Azure94 3684:Azure94 3601:Azure94 3586:Gyalu22 3560:article 3555:Azure94 3542:Azure94 3512:Azure94 3499:Gyalu22 3491:claims. 3473:Azure94 3460:Azure94 3434:Azure94 3421:Azure94 3393:Azure94 3380:Azure94 3343:Azure94 3329:Azure94 3296:Azure94 3258:Azure94 3244:Azure94 2909:methods 2591:Title: 2383:insult. 2330:Azure94 2309:Azure94 2269:…" to " 2248:Azure94 2225:Azure94 2212:Azure94 2191:Azure94 2176:Azure94 2045:Azure94 2009:Azure94 1990:Azure94 1977:Azure94 1906:Azure94 1389:replyto 1057:Abdulka 945:states. 820:Sources 347:on the 320:Hungary 311:Hungary 267:Hungary 73:B-class 33:dispute 3940:, and 2750:Teleki 2467:Award? 1956:Parkan 1753:before 1681:before 1631:oppose 1293:under 1027:Minusf 1010:Jmabel 966:VinceB 875:Second 847:Jmabel 827:Jmabel 807:Edipqe 777:Jmabel 725:Jmabel 600:Jmabel 583:Jmabel 571:Jmabel 515:Jmabel 494:Jmabel 490:Warsaw 486:Warsaw 482:Warsaw 474:Jmabel 467:Jmabel 413:Jmabel 79:scale. 3932:Hi, @ 3871:this! 2986:means 2974:means 2947:means 2817:After 1920:this? 906:Award 775:. -- 654:is a 465:. -- 4144:help 4125:help 4103:help 4079:help 4060:help 4038:help 3988:talk 3953:talk 3924:talk 3900:talk 3886:talk 3858:talk 3829:talk 3797:talk 3782:talk 3755:talk 3737:talk 3688:talk 3605:talk 3590:talk 3572:talk 3546:talk 3520:talk 3503:talk 3464:talk 3446:talk 3425:talk 3408:talk 3384:talk 3363:talk 3333:talk 3318:talk 3308:Hi @ 3300:talk 3282:is: 3270:talk 3248:talk 3233:talk 3206:Hi @ 3176:and 3149:talk 2458:Hi @ 2428:talk 2321:Hi @ 2313:talk 2277:had 2273:and 2261:had 2257:and 2233:talk 2216:talk 2199:talk 2180:talk 2152:talk 2122:and 2112:war. 2074:talk 2035:talk 2013:talk 1998:talk 1981:talk 1930:talk 1910:talk 1867:talk 1831:talk 1816:talk 1797:talk 1705:talk 1610:talk 1596:talk 1580:talk 1546:talk 1528:talk 1475:talk 1462:FORK 1430:talk 1387:. {{ 1381:bold 1368:FORK 1366:and 1315:talk 1268:talk 1241:talk 1219:talk 1201:talk 1183:zero 1172:talk 1168:45rt 1152:talk 1120:talk 1105:talk 1078:talk 1069:MAP 1061:talk 1031:talk 1014:Talk 978:The 892:Juro 859:talk 840:Juro 811:talk 795:talk 781:Talk 760:talk 737:Juro 575:Juro 505:Juro 453:Juro 439:See 384:maps 2780:12. 2760:11. 2736:10. 2415:4. 2397:3. 2391:2. 2386:1. 1391:}} 1364:POV 1348:old 1025:-- 1008:-- 865:LW 386:be 382:or 380:map 339:Low 167:??? 148:Law 102:Law 4184:: 4172:). 4111:^ 4087:^ 4046:^ 3990:) 3955:) 3936:, 3926:) 3902:) 3888:) 3880:. 3860:) 3831:) 3799:) 3784:) 3757:) 3739:) 3690:) 3607:) 3592:) 3574:) 3548:) 3522:) 3505:) 3466:) 3448:) 3427:) 3410:) 3386:) 3365:) 3354:, 3341:@ 3335:) 3320:) 3302:) 3272:) 3250:) 3235:) 3151:) 2988:." 2949:." 2911:’" 2776:." 2732:." 2708:9. 2680:8. 2652:7. 2644:, 2628:6. 2588:5. 2584:." 2568:4. 2564:." 2536:3. 2506:2. 2473:1. 2430:) 2315:) 2235:) 2218:) 2201:) 2182:) 2154:) 2076:) 2037:) 2026:, 2015:) 2000:) 1983:) 1932:) 1912:) 1869:) 1833:) 1818:) 1799:) 1707:) 1647:. 1612:) 1598:) 1582:) 1558:: 1548:) 1530:) 1477:) 1456:, 1452:, 1448:, 1444:, 1432:) 1317:) 1270:) 1243:) 1221:) 1203:) 1174:) 1154:) 1122:) 1107:) 1080:) 1063:) 1033:) 1012:| 964:-- 861:) 813:) 797:) 779:| 762:• 4146:) 4127:) 4105:) 4081:) 4062:) 4040:) 3986:( 3961:@ 3951:( 3922:( 3908:@ 3898:( 3884:( 3866:@ 3856:( 3843:" 3827:( 3805:@ 3795:( 3780:( 3763:@ 3753:( 3735:( 3697:@ 3686:( 3673:" 3603:( 3588:( 3570:( 3562:. 3544:( 3518:( 3501:( 3462:( 3444:( 3423:( 3406:( 3382:( 3361:( 3331:( 3316:( 3298:( 3268:( 3256:@ 3246:( 3231:( 3147:( 3089:" 3081:" 3075:" 2923:" 2877:" 2869:" 2813:" 2802:" 2792:" 2772:" 2720:" 2533:" 2523:" 2521:. 2426:( 2401:, 2367:. 2311:( 2303:@ 2231:( 2214:( 2197:( 2189:@ 2178:( 2150:( 2134:. 2072:( 2033:( 2011:( 1996:( 1979:( 1928:( 1908:( 1895:4 1892:3 1889:2 1886:1 1865:( 1829:( 1814:( 1795:( 1785:. 1769:. 1757:. 1703:( 1608:( 1594:( 1578:( 1544:( 1526:( 1473:( 1428:( 1313:( 1274:) 1266:( 1239:( 1217:( 1199:( 1192:. 1170:( 1150:( 1118:( 1103:( 1076:( 1059:( 1029:( 987:. 857:( 809:( 793:( 758:( 747:— 394:. 351:. 230:. 203:) 199:( 175:. 85:: 47:. 35:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index