198:
177:
85:
64:
95:
33:
274:
no explanation, and remark that I should take some advice sometime. The remark was uncalled for and certainly inappropriate as I often take advice. If there is a real issue here, kindly bring it to my attention. Now here's some advice. If you want to affect an outcome, you might want to try a little diplomacy first.
273:
You first removed the link from the section and said it had "nothing to do with Free franks", which I found sort of amazing as the link had numerous examples and brief commentary on the items. After restoring the link and pointing out that it had much to do with Free franks, you reassert the claim,
301:“13. Sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject: the link should be directly related to the subject of the article. A general site that has information about a variety of subjects should usually not be linked to from an article on a more specific subject.”
311:, is a huge list of hundreds of links to various postally used covers, the vast majority of which have stamps and thus have nothing to do with this subject. It is expressly and plainly an improper link for this article.
355:
248:
238:
350:
214:
205:
182:
289:
If you find my removing this "amazing" that may be because you do not understand
Knowledge rules on extenal links. An external link is supposed to provide
340:
159:
149:
345:
335:
197:
176:
125:
307:
This article deals with “free franks”, or letters sent through the mail franked by an authorized signature. The link you keep adding,
108:
69:
210:
44:
291:“meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy”
300:
290:
32:
279:
50:
213:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
124:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
316:
275:
120:
100:
84:
63:
329:
308:
312:
17:
90:
114:
320:
283:
26:
270:(I have moved Gwillhickers post from my talk page to here)
356:
Low-importance
Politics of the United Kingdom articles
223:
Knowledge:WikiProject
Politics of the United Kingdom
209:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
112:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
351:
Start-Class
Politics of the United Kingdom articles
226:
Template:WikiProject
Politics of the United Kingdom
8:
30:
293:External links specifically should not be:
206:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
171:
58:
229:Politics of the United Kingdom articles
173:
60:
7:
203:This article is within the scope of
106:This article is within the scope of
49:It is of interest to the following
25:
341:Low-importance Philately articles
196:
175:
93:
83:
62:
31:
346:All WikiProject Philately pages
243:This article has been rated as
154:This article has been rated as
134:Knowledge:WikiProject Philately
336:Start-Class Philately articles
220:Politics of the United Kingdom
211:Politics of the United Kingdom
183:Politics of the United Kingdom
137:Template:WikiProject Philately
1:
321:22:02, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
284:23:18, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
217:and see a list of open tasks.
128:and see a list of open tasks.
266:Inappropriate external link
372:
249:project's importance scale
160:project's importance scale
242:
191:
153:
78:
57:
309:this commercial website
39:This article is rated
109:WikiProject Philately
140:Philately articles
45:content assessment
263:
262:
259:
258:
255:
254:
170:
169:
166:
165:
16:(Redirected from
363:
231:
230:
227:
224:
221:
200:
193:
192:
187:
179:
172:
142:
141:
138:
135:
132:
121:stamp collecting
103:
101:Philately portal
98:
97:
96:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
27:
21:
371:
370:
366:
365:
364:
362:
361:
360:
326:
325:
268:
228:
225:
222:
219:
218:
185:
139:
136:
133:
130:
129:
99:
94:
92:
72:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
23:
22:
18:Talk:Free Frank
15:
12:
11:
5:
369:
367:
359:
358:
353:
348:
343:
338:
328:
327:
324:
323:
305:
304:
303:
295:
294:
267:
264:
261:
260:
257:
256:
253:
252:
245:Low-importance
241:
235:
234:
232:
215:the discussion
201:
189:
188:
186:Low‑importance
180:
168:
167:
164:
163:
156:Low-importance
152:
146:
145:
143:
126:the discussion
105:
104:
88:
76:
75:
73:Low‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
368:
357:
354:
352:
349:
347:
344:
342:
339:
337:
334:
333:
331:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
298:
297:
296:
292:
288:
287:
286:
285:
281:
277:
271:
265:
250:
246:
240:
237:
236:
233:
216:
212:
208:
207:
202:
199:
195:
194:
190:
184:
181:
178:
174:
161:
157:
151:
148:
147:
144:
127:
123:
122:
117:
116:
111:
110:
102:
91:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
276:Gwillhickers
272:
269:
244:
204:
155:
119:
113:
107:
51:WikiProjects
41:Start-class
330:Categories
131:Philately
115:philately
70:Philately
313:Ecphora
247:on the
158:on the
47:scale.
317:talk
280:talk
118:and
239:Low
150:Low
332::
319:)
282:)
315:(
278:(
251:.
162:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
