Knowledge

Talk:Fundamental rights in India

Source 📝

721: 700: 731: 1308:. Fundamental rights, in India (unlike other jurisdiction like the United States) are actually not unalienable or absolute. They are not much different from any other rights in many areas - including the fact that they can be suspended, repealed, or restricted. Therefore, the word guarantee is liable to be mistaken (e.g. other rights are not "guaranteed", or that the "guarantee" is absolute). For an article on fundamental rights - this needs to be stated upfront. The difference arises from three different aspects = how in process it is different, how in substance it is different, and how in spirit it is different. 237: 1813:- thank you both for your interventions - but I guess this is not concluding, and it has gone back to a 15-year old lead (that's still a couple of years after I left this place :-) ). Let me find some better places in Knowledge to make myself useful. This article needs more eyes (and perhaps a few more people directly contributing in the article, than on the Talk Page and the Page History) but I guess there will be time. Peace gentlefolk! 826: 805: 931: 549: 910: 941: 836: 632: 611: 207: 471: 437: 573: 406: 481: 457: 1684:. There has to be a way through which they could be realised in practice and defended against any attack on these rights. Right to constitutional remedies is the means through which this is to be achieved. Dr. Ambedkar considered the right to constitutional remedies as ‘heart and soul of the constitution’. It is so because this right gives a citizen the right to 1441:
based on which the Kesavananda Bharati judgment was provided). And therefore my next three lines assert how difficult it is to amend fundamental rights, and how even after such an amendment they are liable to be struck down, if the courts of law hold the amendments violative of basic structure principle. And therefore the next three statements
1372:
However, fundamental rights, as mentioned earlier are not unalienable - they can be suspended, restricted and repealed. The next difference comes because the constitution provides for an Article 13 that can provide a direct action by the Supreme Court to strike down a law - instead of only passing a
1199:
1. The article suffers from many issues - including inaccuracies. My attention was invited through the lead notice 2. The lead should explain what is "fundamental" to the rights - the Indian constitution's guarantee is not absolute and it is important to mention this in as lucid a manner as possible.
1022:
Section 3 to Section 8 are reproductions of Indian Constitution. In the section on critical analysis, a textbook used by 15 year old children has been used as a significant source. There are some irrelevant statements about corruption, speedy trials, and a rambling about how India "is its people, not
1484:
And that's all I did to the first - section - now may be the sentence construction can be edited, sentences broken (which I will check again, in a bit) but the earlier version was woefully inadequate to get any nuance on this topic (and if you read the rest of the article, there are many more issues
1460:
Fundamental rights can only be amended by a special majority of the Parliament under Article 368 : 259 . However, as per the Basic Structure Doctrine, any such amendments are still subject to review by the Indian courts. Pursuant to the Kesavananda Bharati judgement, challenges to fundamental rights
1440:
Now, there is a third aspect - which has been held by the courts of law in spirit - which is that even where fundamental rights can be repealed by the Legislature (and we need to recognize how), the Supreme Court has asserted its power to enforce the "basic structure argument" (and this is the point
1504:
The above distinction is important because certain fundamental rights (at an article level) applies to citizens only, while others apply to both citizens and other nationals alike. This nuance is currently missing from the entire article, which I hope to bring in a subsequent section. But, at this
1018:
Legal scholarship has moved way past Durga Das Basu's executive volumes, used by law undergrads in their sophomore year. There is nothing on the vibrant debates in the Constituent Assembly of India that has shaped our rights, the particular socio-political forces at play etc. The entire section on
1514:
Coming to the source, The PDF cited in the previous citation is a dead-link (also which used to refer to the earlier version of the constitution). The current live version of the document is the version amended as of November 2021 - I have directly referred to the constitution document - which is
1419:
While not absolute, subject to amendments and reasonable restrictions, fundamental rights are held to a higher standard by the constitution. Under Article 13, any laws (including de-facto laws in the form of "Ordinances, orders, bye-laws, rules, regulations, notifications and customs" having the
1394:
Under Article 13, the courts can directly strike down any law (or any other form of authority having the force of law), as unconstitutional, if found violative of fundamental rights - which it cannot do for any other law (under other forms of law, it relies on common law judgments or legislative
1494:
Also - the other thing done was to amend "six fundamental rights" to six sub-groups - these are not six rights, but six sub-groups of rights. For example, right to equality actually refers to 5 different rights and principles - Equality before law (Article 14), Prohibition of discrimination on
1588:
them for two paragraphs before getting down to business. Moreover, you claim that fundamental rights are so-called because they are justiciable by the Supreme Court. On the other hand, if you look at the NCERT text book "Constitution at Work", there is no mention of the Supreme Court in the
1353:
Fundamental rights are different from any other rights provided under the Constitution, in that they are directly justiciable by the Supreme Court of India. Under Article 32 of the Constitution, any aggrieved person: 50 may directly approach the Supreme Court, bypassing lower courts for
1693:
I am also hesitant to use a primary school textbook to defend this point (but bring it up, since you feel it is good to make the counterpoint) - there are plenty of blog articles and IAS preparation exam articles that make the exact same point I mention above (but I will use none of
1200:
3. There are not 6 rights, but 6 groups of rights - the article seems to have copy-pasted from a previous link 4. The link to Indian constitution in the earlier version was broken. Citations were wrong and in wrong places 5. There were other rephrasings that were done
1252:
Thanks - I have currently worked on only the first section, which itself had many problems. I recognize the article's lead paragraph needs discussion on "scope of the article" - but I continue to think there are several important points that need to come
1566:, thanks for your response. Unfortunately, you have completely ignored my second question. What RS have you used to base this content? Should I take your silence as meaning that you haven't used any? In other words, your edit was basically 153: 1329:
they can be directly appealed to the Supreme Court - this is really the crux of it. You need not wait for the long process of law with the lower courts to get fundamental rights appealed. So this explains my second and third
190: 1118:, just wanted to make sure you haven't forgotten about this. If the issues you pointed out haven't been resolved, feel free to delist the article using the instructions under "individual reassessment" at 1917: 1475:
To illustrate how a fundamental right differs from a legal right - the article already had Right to Property (dead link fixed), but this passage was clumsily written. I have re-written this.
338: 319: 1781:, I have restored your version. I find it much better and elaborative than the status quo and is correct to my knowledge. Just make sure you add reliable sources, I will help find some. 1577:
prominence to inessential detail. I can see that you are yourself convinced that it is essential detail. But that is not enough for Knowledge. You need to be able to convince the others.
147: 1461:
through amendments were deemed to invite higher scrutiny under the "Basic Structure" test, with the Supreme Court asserting its rights to strike down laws that fail the test.'
1957: 777: 248: 44: 1203:
Given the substance of the above problems, I have reverted to my version. The user is free to edit from here - but please dont blank without responding to specific issues
787: 1902: 1912: 1589:
introduction of the topic. I am afraid you are confusing the mechanics for substance. Your content is more like a lawyer's manual rather than an encyclopaedic article.
1495:
specific grounds (Article 15), Equality of opportunity in public employment (Article 16), Abolition of Untouchability (Article 17) and Abolition of titles (Article 18)
563: 1697:
As you can see there is no Primary Research needed (or done) on this - because the constitution document under Article 13 and Article 32 of the Indian constitution
198: 1942: 1922: 682: 672: 1262:
I will go line-by-line, so that you get a sense on how I am thinking. I am returning to Knowledge after long, so will also benefit from any feedback from you.
753: 1952: 592: 1967: 1947: 1524:
The citations are in-line in specific pages of the constitution document itself, which by itself explains in each article the interpretation above given.
882: 456: 194: 79: 1907: 892: 1681:
One would agree that our Constitution contains a very impressive list of Fundamental Rights. But merely writing down a list of rights is not enough
1927: 1841: 744: 705: 648: 1701:(and as I said above this article seems to refer to every other link correctly except the live version of the constitution in its current form). 1972: 1937: 1897: 539: 529: 1887: 558: 447: 85: 1982: 1063: 993: 983: 1628:
It seems absurd to me that an article on fundamental rights does not even refer to the correct legal document of the Indian constitution.
168: 1932: 858: 720: 699: 263: 135: 1962: 639: 616: 258: 1987: 1892: 1882: 1845: 1690:
n. The Supreme Court and the High Courts can issue orders and give directives to the government for the enforcement of rights."
254: 99: 30: 849: 810: 581: 129: 104: 20: 1051:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1977: 1832:
Looking at the article, large swaths of content is devoid of inline citations. It'd be useful if this could be improved —
1178:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
74: 1148: 1127: 1080: 417: 125: 504: 494: 442: 65: 24: 1026:
The section on "Significance and characteristics" is equally perplexing with a host of trivia and much is unsourced.
1687:
approach a High Court or the Supreme Court to get any of the fundamental rights restored in case of their violation
206: 185: 175: 1625:
I explicitly mentioned that I corrected this link - but you seem to have ignored this and conducted a mass revert.
1282:
retained this line from earlier version. Fixed citation. I believe this agrees with the First statement principle.
1277:
Fundamental rights in India are the rights guaranteed under Part III (Articles 12-35) of the Constitution of India
1023:
its land." Two very short sections on amendments and right to privacy that has got barely any legs to stand upon.
236: 1761: 954: 915: 217: 736: 1144: 1123: 1076: 958:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the 109: 253:, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the 1786: 1162: 1105: 1059: 1031: 141: 423: 1818: 1769: 1708: 1633: 1546: 1395:
precedence, or due process check) to provide a case-by-case opinion. Therefore my next two sentences.
1213: 1860: 405: 1864: 1837: 1764:, which I think is your primary crib. In the meantime, I suggest you let the link get sorted above 1597: 1239: 161: 55: 857:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
752:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
647:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
222: 70: 1806: 1782: 1505:
point - if we restrict our focus to the concepts, we will miss to understand this nuance later
1158: 1136: 1115: 1101: 1027: 749: 51: 219: 1814: 1778: 1765: 1704: 1629: 1574: 1563: 1542: 1209: 841: 1868: 1849: 1822: 1790: 1773: 1712: 1637: 1601: 1592:
I suggest you consult a wide range of RS before attempting to revise the lead again. --
1550: 1243: 1217: 1166: 1152: 1131: 1109: 1084: 1035: 1833: 1810: 1593: 1533:
Hope these are elaborate and specific enough to understand. Happy to hear your thoughts
1235: 1193: 221: 835: 825: 804: 548: 1876: 1584:
because it directly addressed what "fundamental rights" are. Your version is talking
1140: 1119: 1196:
had reverted my leads explaining my reversions were legalistic. Here is my response
1567: 1231: 644: 586: 486: 1615: 930: 909: 1066:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment. 940: 946: 936: 831: 726: 631: 610: 476: 1672: 1581: 1224: 572: 470: 436: 1019:
origins is a travesty with three quarters of the content being unsourced.
854: 1420:
force of law) can be struck down by the courts as unconstitutional.''
502:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 1760:
I am striking the above to keep it specific - let me think more on
499: 1859:
I have added the seventh fundamental right "Right to Education"
1616:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Fundamental_rights_in_India#cite_note-1
1612:
But can you let me know why you have let the broken link stand'
959: 399: 223: 15: 571: 547: 257:. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be 1304:
However, a question now arises on what is the meaning of
1223:
Please explain how you revised lead paragraph satisfies
1143:
and EW above. This GAR has been open for almost a year.
1619: 1187: 369: 350: 331: 312: 293: 160: 853:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 748:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 643:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 267:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
1918:B-Class Indian politics articles of Top-importance 1606:Let metry and come back to you on the remaining 1671:- please refer to Page 40-41 of NCERT textbook ( 1139:, please either keep or delist this article per 498:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 174: 8: 1958:High-importance Freedom of speech articles 1234:you have used to base this content on. -- 904: 799: 694: 605: 431: 272: 231: 1673:https://ncert.nic.in/ncerts/l/keps202.pdf 249:Social sciences and society good articles 1903:B-Class India articles of Top-importance 596:as a high quality India-related article. 1913:Top-importance Indian politics articles 906: 801: 762:Knowledge:WikiProject Freedom of speech 696: 607: 433: 403: 1580:The original version was in line with 1485:and that explains the article warning) 765:Template:WikiProject Freedom of speech 1515:maintained by the Government of India 7: 1943:Top-importance Human rights articles 1923:WikiProject Indian politics articles 1064:Talk:Fundamental rights in India/GA1 1047:The following discussion is closed. 952:This article is within the scope of 847:This article is within the scope of 742:This article is within the scope of 637:This article is within the scope of 492:This article is within the scope of 1668:that you seem to have made on NCERT 962:and the subjects encompassed by it. 422:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 1953:B-Class Freedom of speech articles 657:Knowledge:WikiProject Human rights 14: 1968:High-importance politics articles 1948:WikiProject Human rights articles 660:Template:WikiProject Human rights 1908:B-Class Indian politics articles 1675:) - Page 15/16 of 25 and I quote 1174:The discussion above is closed. 939: 929: 908: 834: 824: 803: 729: 719: 698: 630: 609: 479: 469: 455: 435: 404: 235: 205: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1206:Many thanks for your attention 1157:I apologize. Will delist asap. 988:This article has been rated as 887:This article has been rated as 782:This article has been rated as 677:This article has been rated as 534:This article has been rated as 1928:India portal selected articles 867:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics 1: 1973:WikiProject Politics articles 1938:B-Class Human rights articles 1898:Top-importance India articles 870:Template:WikiProject Politics 861:and see a list of open tasks. 756:and see a list of open tasks. 745:WikiProject Freedom of speech 651:and see a list of open tasks. 559:the Indian politics workgroup 556:This article is supported by 42:Put new text under old text. 1888:Old requests for peer review 1110:18:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC) 1036:18:53, 24 January 2022 (UTC) 1983:Top-importance law articles 1167:19:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC) 1153:19:18, 9 January 2023 (UTC) 1132:07:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC) 1097: 1085:20:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC) 514:Knowledge:WikiProject India 243:Fundamental rights in India 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 25:Fundamental rights in India 2004: 1933:WikiProject India articles 1666:And on your specific point 1573:Your edit basically gives 994:project's importance scale 893:project's importance scale 788:project's importance scale 768:Freedom of speech articles 683:project's importance scale 590:, which means that it was 540:project's importance scale 517:Template:WikiProject India 261:. Editors may also seek a 1963:B-Class politics articles 1869:06:13, 31 July 2022 (UTC) 1850:14:17, 15 June 2022 (UTC) 1762:Knowledge:Manual of Style 1699:directly gives this point 1230:Also, please provide the 1183:Edits to the lead section 987: 968:Knowledge:WikiProject Law 924: 886: 819: 781: 714: 676: 625: 579: 555: 533: 464: 430: 386: 377:Good article reassessment 358:Good article reassessment 275: 271: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1988:WikiProject Law articles 1823:13:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 1791:06:56, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 1774:02:05, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 1713:01:56, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 1638:01:13, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 1602:23:10, 16 May 2022 (UTC) 1551:17:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC) 1244:15:29, 15 May 2022 (UTC) 1218:15:03, 15 May 2022 (UTC) 1176:Please do not modify it. 1049:Please do not modify it. 971:Template:WikiProject Law 737:Freedom of speech portal 640:WikiProject Human rights 1893:B-Class India articles 1883:Delisted good articles 1855:Right To Education Act 576: 552: 412:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 1620:Link to specific diff 1145:~~ AirshipJungleman29 1077:~~ AirshipJungleman29 663:Human rights articles 575: 551: 389:Delisted good article 255:good article criteria 199:Auto-archiving period 100:Neutral point of view 1978:B-Class law articles 1458:The spirit point - ' 1415:The substance point 1349:The process point - 850:WikiProject Politics 301:Good article nominee 105:No original research 1742:On second thoughts 1058:This discussion is 1373:specific judgment. 1124:Extraordinary Writ 1050: 580:This article is a 577: 553: 418:content assessment 351:September 19, 2007 276:Article milestones 86:dispute resolution 47: 1048: 1008: 1007: 1004: 1003: 1000: 999: 903: 902: 899: 898: 873:politics articles 798: 797: 794: 793: 759:Freedom of speech 750:Freedom of speech 706:Freedom of speech 693: 692: 689: 688: 604: 603: 600: 599: 495:WikiProject India 398: 397: 394: 393: 332:November 14, 2006 230: 229: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1995: 1828:Inline citations 1075: 976: 975: 972: 969: 966: 949: 944: 943: 933: 926: 925: 920: 912: 905: 875: 874: 871: 868: 865: 844: 839: 838: 828: 821: 820: 815: 807: 800: 770: 769: 766: 763: 760: 739: 734: 733: 732: 723: 716: 715: 710: 702: 695: 665: 664: 661: 658: 655: 634: 627: 626: 621: 613: 606: 582:selected article 522: 521: 518: 515: 512: 489: 484: 483: 482: 473: 466: 465: 460: 459: 458: 453: 450: 439: 432: 415: 409: 408: 400: 387:Current status: 372: 353: 334: 315: 296: 273: 239: 232: 224: 210: 209: 200: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 2003: 2002: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1873: 1872: 1857: 1830: 1185: 1180: 1179: 1094: 1070: 1053: 1043: 1041:GA Reassessment 1016: 973: 970: 967: 964: 963: 955:WikiProject Law 945: 938: 918: 889:High-importance 872: 869: 866: 863: 862: 842:Politics portal 840: 833: 814:High‑importance 813: 784:High-importance 767: 764: 761: 758: 757: 735: 730: 728: 709:High‑importance 708: 662: 659: 656: 653: 652: 619: 519: 516: 513: 510: 509: 485: 480: 478: 454: 451: 445: 416:on Knowledge's 413: 370:January 9, 2023 368: 349: 330: 311: 292: 245:was one of the 226: 225: 220: 197: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 2001: 1999: 1991: 1990: 1985: 1980: 1975: 1970: 1965: 1960: 1955: 1950: 1945: 1940: 1935: 1930: 1925: 1920: 1915: 1910: 1905: 1900: 1895: 1890: 1885: 1875: 1874: 1856: 1853: 1829: 1826: 1804: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1731: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1702: 1695: 1691: 1676: 1669: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1626: 1623: 1590: 1578: 1571: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1247: 1246: 1228: 1184: 1181: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1134: 1093: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1068: 1054: 1045: 1044: 1042: 1039: 1015: 1012: 1010: 1006: 1005: 1002: 1001: 998: 997: 990:Top-importance 986: 980: 979: 977: 951: 950: 934: 922: 921: 919:Top‑importance 913: 901: 900: 897: 896: 885: 879: 878: 876: 859:the discussion 846: 845: 829: 817: 816: 808: 796: 795: 792: 791: 780: 774: 773: 771: 754:the discussion 741: 740: 724: 712: 711: 703: 691: 690: 687: 686: 679:Top-importance 675: 669: 668: 666: 649:the discussion 635: 623: 622: 620:Top‑importance 614: 602: 601: 598: 597: 578: 568: 567: 564:Top-importance 554: 544: 543: 536:Top-importance 532: 526: 525: 523: 520:India articles 491: 490: 474: 462: 461: 452:Top‑importance 440: 428: 427: 421: 410: 396: 395: 392: 391: 384: 383: 380: 373: 365: 364: 361: 354: 346: 345: 342: 335: 327: 326: 323: 316: 308: 307: 304: 297: 289: 288: 285: 282: 278: 277: 269: 268: 240: 228: 227: 218: 216: 215: 212: 211: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2000: 1989: 1986: 1984: 1981: 1979: 1976: 1974: 1971: 1969: 1966: 1964: 1961: 1959: 1956: 1954: 1951: 1949: 1946: 1944: 1941: 1939: 1936: 1934: 1931: 1929: 1926: 1924: 1921: 1919: 1916: 1914: 1911: 1909: 1906: 1904: 1901: 1899: 1896: 1894: 1891: 1889: 1886: 1884: 1881: 1880: 1878: 1871: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1854: 1852: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1827: 1825: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1743: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1729: 1728: 1725: 1723: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1703: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1689: 1688: 1683: 1682: 1677: 1674: 1670: 1667: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1655: 1654: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1624: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1576: 1572: 1569: 1565: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1462: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1423: 1421: 1416: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1355: 1350: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1307: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1278: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1226: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1204: 1201: 1197: 1195: 1190: 1189: 1182: 1177: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1135: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1091: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1073: 1069: 1067: 1065: 1061: 1056: 1055: 1052: 1040: 1038: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1024: 1020: 1013: 1011: 995: 991: 985: 982: 981: 978: 961: 957: 956: 948: 942: 937: 935: 932: 928: 927: 923: 917: 914: 911: 907: 894: 890: 884: 881: 880: 877: 860: 856: 852: 851: 843: 837: 832: 830: 827: 823: 822: 818: 812: 809: 806: 802: 789: 785: 779: 776: 775: 772: 755: 751: 747: 746: 738: 727: 725: 722: 718: 717: 713: 707: 704: 701: 697: 684: 680: 674: 671: 670: 667: 650: 646: 642: 641: 636: 633: 629: 628: 624: 618: 615: 612: 608: 595: 594: 589: 588: 583: 574: 570: 569: 565: 562:(assessed as 561: 560: 550: 546: 545: 541: 537: 531: 528: 527: 524: 507: 506: 501: 497: 496: 488: 477: 475: 472: 468: 467: 463: 449: 444: 441: 438: 434: 429: 425: 419: 411: 407: 402: 401: 390: 385: 381: 379: 378: 374: 371: 367: 366: 362: 360: 359: 355: 352: 348: 347: 343: 341: 340: 336: 333: 329: 328: 324: 322: 321: 317: 314: 313:June 28, 2006 310: 309: 305: 303: 302: 298: 295: 291: 290: 286: 283: 280: 279: 274: 270: 266: 265: 260: 256: 252: 251: 250: 244: 241: 238: 234: 233: 214: 213: 208: 204: 196: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1858: 1831: 1807:Akshaypatill 1803: 1783:Akshaypatill 1741: 1730: 1727: 1726: 1724: 1698: 1686: 1685: 1680: 1679: 1665: 1656: 1653: 1652: 1611: 1585: 1459: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1352: 1348: 1305: 1281: 1280: 1276: 1275: 1208: 1205: 1202: 1198: 1191: 1188:Link to diff 1186: 1175: 1159:TrangaBellam 1137:TrangaBellam 1116:TrangaBellam 1102:TrangaBellam 1095: 1071: 1057: 1046: 1028:TrangaBellam 1025: 1021: 1017: 1009: 989: 974:law articles 953: 888: 848: 783: 743: 678: 654:Human rights 645:Human rights 638: 617:Human rights 591: 587:India portal 585: 557: 535: 505:project page 503: 493: 487:India portal 424:WikiProjects 388: 376: 375: 357: 356: 337: 318: 300: 299: 294:June 9, 2006 264:reassessment 262: 247: 246: 242: 202: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1096:Please see 1074:: Delisted. 1060:transcluded 960:legal field 339:Peer review 320:Peer review 259:renominated 148:free images 31:not a forum 1877:Categories 1815:Chancemill 1779:Chancemill 1766:Chancemill 1705:Chancemill 1630:Chancemill 1564:Chancemill 1543:Chancemill 1330:sentences. 1210:Chancemill 947:Law portal 1861:Asthra137 1834:DaxServer 1811:Kautilya3 1594:Kautilya3 1582:MOS:BEGIN 1354:remedies. 1306:guarantee 1236:Kautilya3 1225:MOS:BEGIN 1194:Kautilya3 1098:this note 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1575:WP:UNDUE 1253:upfront. 864:Politics 855:politics 811:Politics 593:selected 448:Politics 382:Delisted 344:Reviewed 325:Reviewed 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 992:on the 891:on the 786:on the 681:on the 584:on the 538:on the 414:B-class 284:Process 203:90 days 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1586:around 1141:WP:GAR 1120:WP:GAR 1092:Issues 1072:Result 1014:Issues 420:scale. 306:Listed 287:Result 126:Google 1809:and @ 1694:them) 1568:WP:OR 1232:WP:RS 1062:from 511:India 500:India 443:India 191:Index 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1865:talk 1819:talk 1787:talk 1770:talk 1709:talk 1634:talk 1598:talk 1547:talk 1240:talk 1214:talk 1163:talk 1149:talk 1128:talk 1106:talk 1081:talk 1032:talk 883:High 778:High 363:Kept 281:Date 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1417:- ' 984:Top 965:Law 916:Law 673:Top 530:Top 176:TWL 1879:: 1867:) 1848:) 1844:· 1840:· 1821:) 1789:) 1772:) 1711:) 1636:) 1614:? 1600:) 1549:) 1279:= 1242:) 1216:) 1165:) 1151:) 1130:) 1122:. 1108:) 1100:. 1083:) 1034:) 566:). 446:: 201:: 193:, 156:) 54:; 1863:( 1846:c 1842:m 1838:t 1836:( 1817:( 1805:@ 1785:( 1768:( 1707:( 1678:" 1632:( 1622:) 1618:( 1596:( 1570:? 1545:( 1351:* 1347:* 1238:( 1227:. 1212:( 1192:@ 1161:( 1147:( 1126:( 1104:( 1079:( 1030:( 996:. 895:. 790:. 685:. 542:. 508:. 426:: 195:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Fundamental rights in India
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
Index
1

Former good article
Social sciences and society good articles
good article criteria

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑