340:
the opposite was exactly the problem: too many disparate "patches". Yes, the sentence "...This transition closed the KOME chapter in the South Bay Area's rock scene ; KSJO met a more ignoble rock demise, after writhing in head-bangers' mosh pit agony for several more years until 2004, finally suffering sufficient brain-damage to have lost any fluency with the
English language." might appear to be POV to someone in GA or otherwise not listening to the two stations at that time. Whilst receiving that "lightning bolt" inspiration for one of the best sentences (after semicolon) I've ever written (as a, sometimes pro, writer of various types of prose), I neglected to consider those non-listeners. Perhaps it wasn't clear on a fast read that this refers to KSJO, not KOME. Yes, it should be in the KSJO article, however, that now-Spanish-language Clear Channel station, sadly continuing to use that venerable call sign, would get upset about what they would see as an inflammatory criticism, which it absolutely is. There needs to be a "KSJO-pre-Spanish" /vs./ a "KSJO" article; perhaps the former could be in the "defunct stations" category?...by all means, some Wikipedian should set one up.
344:
Wikipedians? I have identified myself, and my credentials used to be cleary visible. Jona has identified herself. Dennis
Erectus is probably using the "...Neanderthal..." handle. Unless you two are Mel Karmazin, Dan Tapson, Ron Cutler, John Higdon, etc. (Ben Fong-Torres, Brad Kava and other journalists are sometimes a little off the mark and POV) then I doubt that you are "more familiar with it" than I (before Infinity) or Jona (thereafter) or, probably, some previous unindentifiable contributors. Yes, there was excessive POV before, altho to anyone listening to the two stations at the time, the "...head-bangers..." was NOT, it was just an especially picturesque description of the format facts then, which needed some "In other words..." for the non-listener. Yes, the added logos were needed and appreciated; I had wanted to add some (especially my almost complete KSJO collection), but don't have the time to study this Knowledge (XXG) mechanism (to where to upload them?).
360:
else) to EMail privately in order to converse on voice phone and ascertain some form of identity. ("His" herein may refer to any gender, per long-establish
English usage; PC is as bad as POV, IMNSHO.) Yes, I am chauvinistic about date and time format: The US needs to learn to conform to low-order-to-hi-order US military, genealogical and most of the rest of the world's usage: 27 Aug 2006...when is 9/11?...in Sep or Nov--no way to tell without context containing numbers greater than 12: whatever format one uses, month MUST be alpha, NOT numeric. Anyone who wants to change this should use the Knowledge (XXG) "user preference" coding. Yup, I personally believe that a benevolent dictatorship has certain advantages.
672:
information). Remember, we simply need to state that "so and so believes this... yet so and so believes that." Unfortunatelly we can't put every opinion that everyone believes. (I learn this the hard way) Nevertheless we will need to discuss what the main concerns are for this article. I believe I have a good idea. That is one person has sourced information but the other has conflicting information and removes this information. (or can't find the information or doesn't believe the information). (An inclusion exclusion problem). The best way I found to get around this is to do "small edits" to the main article and properly state what changes you are doing or to list the changes here for further discussion. --
668:
that may have happened in the past. I say this because I know that if you work together and properly express your concerns this article will be great. Also, if you remove this stress and fear of loosing "important" edits (deletions) I think you shall all feel better in properly editing this article. Knowledge (XXG) is not a race, it will be here tomorow and probably for many more years. Take your time and add what you want to say in the best wikipedia way you can! And if you think the information is wrong well say that too. History is important even if it is wrong.
443:"Every little tidbit of" info, I know, doesn't belong here, especially if they can be found in citations and external links. At a glance, one might surmise that the chronology is redundant, as it is based on an external link...but the pre-Infinity history, ignored in the external link, has nowhere else to reside nor be improved upon...yet. There needs to be a KOME Website; when there is, it could have more such detail. On the other hand, the Web is not contstrained by Brittanica's heavyweight paper limits, so why not embellish beyond a page or two?
565:, nevertheless not everyone is familiar with this auxilary wiki feature. I alway particularly enjoy a chronology and I know that everyone learns differently. Having a different format for the information will be an asset for tactile readers. Furthermore, I can see that this article is in it's infancy, but has some room for expansion. This will require better lines of communications. I was wondering, to avoid cluttering this discussion page, if you could validate your email address. Thanking you in advance for your courteous and effective response. --
367:"Fledgling" is not an apt description of the proto-Infinity owners whose FCC application crossed my desk at the time; I should have photocopied it. Aside from minority (10% ISTR) owner Michael Weiner of Palo Alto (who may or may not be the same as an announcer using that name), all were New Yorkers with MetroMedia connections, and maybe the shoe business. "Nascent" might be a good word for proto-Infinity? At one point, possibly overall, KOME was their worst-(revenue?)performing station of about thirty; I can't recall that publication to cite.
364:
ownership details found in
Broadcasting and Cable Yearbook--on all radio and TV stations; e.g., antenna lat-long, height above average terrain, ERP, etc. In telcon with FCC, it appears that they do not conserve archives beyond about five years. Of course, these papers are likely lovingly protected by NARA, but unearthing them is not a quickie, simple matter. Worse, too many reference librarians are clueless on "DON'T toss last year's /Broadcasting and Cable Yearbook/", San Jose State U being a notable exception, but still missing a few years.
411:... Sorry, got carried away. Just kidding. Acutally, I'm just a radio geek (although I worked in radio a while back myself) who spent a few formative years growing up in the Bay Area (early 80s). I remember all the rock stations from back then, including back in 1982 and 1983, when KOME and KSJO were trying to out-metal each other. Hell, I remember when KOME added Michael Jackson's "Beat It" (which sounded weird amongst all the Iron Maiden and Judas Priest stuff), and the DJ announced it was Eddie Van Halen...
348:
in these details which might be lost forever without the gradual improvement of alumni input, including especially owners, managers and program directors (that chronology should be restored forthwith). There are hardly any archived citable publications with this info. Where there are, you find such inaccuracies as /Gavin Report/ showing me moving to KSFO (typo of KSJO). Now...I realize that what is needed here for this purpose is something like:
265:
175:
151:
371:
actually doing the thing. It is online free; just Google "1911 Britannica", maybe before checking
Knowledge (XXG) (ha, ha), where first-person, court-admissible testimony is considered LESS desireable than any old citable publication (which, in this business / art, is all too-often inaccurate)...Huh?.../au contraire, mes amis/, at least as long as the "witness" identifies himself, maybe SMails sworn or signed affidavit?
185:
1219:
1139:
1059:
979:
906:
833:
760:
687:
664:. In short you should try to incorperate as much information into on article. Nevertheless, at one point you'll have to branch out. This is permited. So technically, you shouldn't branch out but then again you can (once you get enough information!). I think this article has enough information and has a great pottential for exepansion if you guys where more acceptant towards including information.
22:
71:
53:
253:
561:. However may I politely suggest that what you are doing may be frustrating, not only to the editors that have taken precious time to add their information, but to those who realize that bits and pieces of the article appear to have been drastically changed. I also couldn't help but notice that there was a sort of timeline. Yes perhaps this would be good to be on
621:. Obviously, obscure call letters would not fit the criteria, but many feel that KOME is one of the stations that deserves its own article. Problem would be if another notable station (and not some small AM station in an obscure market) decides to use those call letters. Then perhaps a disambiguation page would be in order. --
617:. Many people would be searching around forever trying to find any of these stations, since they are long gone. A redirect could also remedy this situation. I do feel that if a defunct station gets its own article, the seperate article should be referenced in the article of the current station. There is a discussion about it
347:
Originally, I wasn't thinking about my own image, Google-searchibility, or any ego-tripping...just the facts (again, the "...head-banger..." being a fact). Then I noticed the Google results, and so spelled my own name both ways. There are a great many people, whether alumni or listeners, interested
667:
To summarized what has happened to date my understanding is that there is an escallation of witty comments, perhaps rude and defencive editing. I am not aware of who started what, but I am aware that the situation is escallating. This needs to stop. I want both of you to appologize for any rudness
556:
At a first glance what you are doing appears to be removing any inconvenient truths that don't fit within what you would like the article to be. (ex.: 12000 watts? FM movie? Nemi?) I think that would be called adding a POV by removing perfectly good information. I can certainly appreciate the fact
359:
I have been awaiting "Bubba73" to EMail or, better, voice phone to identify himself, at least somewhat. I almost agree with him that
Knowledge (XXG) "editors" should be "registerd", but only to the extent that they should better identify themselves. I invite "FightingIrish" (or just about anyone
343:
Back to KOME: altho I would be (was?) the first to insist that this article needed a "massive rewrite", I take exception to the suggestion that many previous contributors are not "more familiar with it". There was a gross error in first ownership change in a recent edit. Who are you guys besides
339:
No time nor inclination for a flame war here (I tired of that back in Unix LISTSERV daze)...but I can't resist one salvo: Yes, the article was a mess that I wasn't prepared to fix wholesale, and I know (nor care, frankly) little internal info after
Infinity; No, it was not "badly neglected"--quite
638:
gets first crack at its undisambiguated call sign, without regard to market size. So if there is a station currently using the KOME call sign (I don't know if there is or not), then it should get the KOME title no matter how big or small its market is. For one thing, a current radio station can't
395:
Thanks for your contributions, Jay. Not sure why you're calling me out, but I guess I'll step in here to defend myself. I got much of the information from a variety of sources on the web (mostly what's already referenced) and added it to whatever was already there (hoping that people who had more
370:
Even in
Encyclopedia Brittanica, you will be hard-pressed to find any articles on any "art" that do not include some POV. Many scholars appreciate the 1911 Brittanica precisely because some of its articles are written by the likes of Henry Ford (on mass production, ISTR) who were actually there,
439:
Again, I doubt that any article including anything about ART could technically meet
Knowledge (XXG) standards. I have been a journalist, so I'm usually trying to be unbiased (except when trying to be inflammatory with the "...head-bangers' mosh pit..." (now moved to KSJO article to see how much
435:
Sumner: I didn't intend to seem to "call you out". Maybe it was your "FightingIrish" handle (a little Irish here, too) that makes it a pleasant surprise that you have a sense of humor. Hey, I AGREE that the article was a mess, full of redundancies (most of which I think I just reduced from the
363:
As I pointed out to "Bubba73" in private EMail, the format and programming aspects of such articles (someone: PLEASE condense the unwieldy number of radio formats) on radio involve ART, albeit the "gutter of show business", often no more than a juke box. Yes, there ought to be the technical and
305:
I think this is POV: "after writhing in head-bangers' mosh pit agony for several more years until 2004, finally suffering sufficient brain-damage to have lost any fluency with the
English language." and needs to be cleaned up by someone more familiar with it. the article needs some polish too.
401:
The only information I got rid of was stuff that seemed to jump around too much, or be too irrelevant. Also got rid of the chronology for the same reason (plus it was too redundant). Otherwise, I moved information around under various headings and subheadings. In short, I like articles that are
955:
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as
882:
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as
809:
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as
736:
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as
356:...one of the best such sites. However, until such time as someone coughs up the bucks for such a Website, Knowledge (XXG) will have to suffice for both KOME and "defunct" pre-Spanish KSJO. Kindly bear with us all who are attempting to embellish and preserve these details in the meanwhile.
671:
Secondly, to be able to say something the best way you can't constantly be berated by frustrating Removal edits. I will assume that some of the information is "conflicting" or even "contradictory." (I can help you that or you could even post the links here so everyone can look at whatever
324:
Happened across this article, and was shocked by how badly neglected it's been. I got rid of all the POV stuff and made it into something somewhat worthwhile. I also added some logos (YAY!). The list of former personalities could use a little cleanup, or perhaps it could just be deleted.
446:
You did a good job of clean-up, by Knowledge (XXG) standards...except for going a little far to cut the chronology, IMO. I just took exception to a few things...not "diss"ing you, just wanted to know if you were Ben Fong-Torres or some such. SMail, EMail or voice phone anytime.
1268:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on
1188:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on
1108:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on
1028:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on
643:
any other title, whereas a defunct one can either be merged into its current call sign or go to something like "KOME (defunct)" if necessary. Also, I don't know whether KUFX is the same license that was held by KOME or not; that was part of my question. It
596:
Tough call. I think Knowledge (XXG) prefers entire station histories to be placed in the article of its frequency. But it seems the consensus of many users is that it is acceptable for defunct radio stations of note. Examples of this would be
278:
161:
440:
Hispanic macho attacks it); it sounds like you were also getting a headache trying to listen to KSJO at that time. Still, I think that sentence is factual, just odd word-choice to describe those format facts.
521:
I took out the chronology, since it goes against Knowledge (XXG)'s preferred article approach. I did incorporate some of the information elsewhere. Plus, the list exists in the Metroactive article anyway.
1265:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
1185:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
1105:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
1025:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
952:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
879:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
806:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
733:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
557:
that you appear to be cleaning-up the article. In fact the first thing I generally look for is to ensure the article uses proper wiki rules when citing and giving information, found at
1332:
283:
516:
What position did Ron Nenni hold at KOME? Was he GM or MD? I left out Nenni's name until a title is found for him. Otherwise, nobody will know or care about him, and may be confused.
526:
I left in the ratings info, since I think it's good information. Whether or not it concurs with Knowledge (XXG) standards, I don't know. Perhaps this could be cleaned up sometime.
1327:
1337:
1307:
127:
133:
1322:
237:
243:
1312:
618:
103:
1302:
1246:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
1243:
1166:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
1163:
1086:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
1083:
1006:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
1003:
933:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
930:
860:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
857:
787:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
784:
714:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
711:
1270:
1262:
1258:
1235:
1190:
1182:
1178:
1155:
1110:
1102:
1098:
1075:
1030:
1022:
1018:
995:
957:
949:
945:
922:
884:
876:
872:
849:
811:
803:
799:
776:
738:
730:
726:
703:
436:
chronology). Originally, I had just thrown in a few little pre-Infinity tidbits and hoped that someone might make the whole a little more coherent.
1342:
1317:
213:
94:
58:
1274:
1194:
1114:
1034:
961:
888:
815:
742:
396:
info would add to it). I attempted to clean up the article because it was a mess, and didn't even come close to Knowledge (XXG) standards.
81:
198:
156:
493:, which is on the same frequency as the old KMPX. I'm working on putting all KMPX stuff there, but may just do a seperate article on
420:
So I'm just an average schmuck trying to pretty up a few articles. Again, welcome to Knowledge (XXG). And thanks for the diss. --
33:
531:
And no, I'm really not Sumner Redstone. Like that old geezer knows how to operate a computer! Kinda like Rupert Murdoch on
582:
It is not Knowledge (XXG) policy that radio stations get distinct articles for each call sign change in their history; if
270:
374:
R.I.P. Great FM Rock Radio of the 60s-80s. Any EMail, flaming (probably to be disregarded) or friendly, is welcome at
1284:
1204:
1124:
1044:
475:
In the first paragraph, I eliminated the 1979 12,000 watts reference, as it seems out of place and irrelevant.
39:
21:
484:
article. I'll attack that later, so you've been warned! (on a side note, I do have logo images for them)
212:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
102:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1231:
1151:
1094:
1071:
1066:
991:
918:
868:
845:
840:
772:
699:
1254:
1226:
722:
694:
1230:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
1174:
1150:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
1146:
1070:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
990:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
917:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
844:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
795:
771:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
767:
698:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
453:
380:
1280:
1200:
1120:
1040:
1014:
986:
965:
941:
913:
892:
819:
746:
459:
383:
622:
541:
421:
326:
310:
190:
661:
558:
494:
540:
BTW: Got any sticker images, like individual bands or the mid-80s 'digital readout' logo?--
1247:
1167:
1087:
1007:
934:
861:
788:
715:
586:
is the same license that once belonged to KOME, then this has to be redirected to KUFX.
99:
1218:
1138:
1058:
978:
905:
832:
759:
686:
502:
Got rid of excess wikification. Once or twice for each term (freeform) seems adequate.
1296:
673:
566:
649:
587:
307:
86:
174:
150:
648:
that way from this article, but KUFX's article doesn't give the same impression.
407:
As for me? No my name's not Mel. I'm actually Sumner Redstone, and I'm going to
402:
enjoyable to read, without trying to cram in every little tidbit of information.
375:
260:
208:
203:
180:
76:
480:
The KSJO reference (1968 debut) doesn't flow well, better to put that on the
598:
252:
70:
52:
507:
Eliminated the reference to the movie "FM". I believe it's on the
1242:
Knowledge (XXG) article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
1162:
Knowledge (XXG) article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
1082:
Knowledge (XXG) article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
1002:
Knowledge (XXG) article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
929:
Knowledge (XXG) article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
856:
Knowledge (XXG) article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
783:
Knowledge (XXG) article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
710:
Knowledge (XXG) article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
614:
610:
606:
602:
583:
508:
490:
481:
562:
351:
15:
470:
I Cleaned up the overall sentence structure, for readability.
1217:
1137:
1057:
977:
904:
831:
758:
685:
251:
1288:
1208:
1128:
1048:
968:
895:
822:
749:
676:
652:
625:
590:
569:
544:
456:
424:
386:
329:
314:
634:
As far as I know, a currently-broadcasting radio station
202:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
511:
article, and it seems irrelevant to the KOME article.
98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1273:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
1193:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
1113:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
1033:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
960:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
887:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
814:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
741:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
465:Okay, I cleaned it up a little. Here's what I did:
242:This article has not yet received a rating on the
132:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1333:Low-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
8:
1263:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline
1183:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline
1103:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline
1023:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline
950:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline
877:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline
804:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline
731:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline
1328:Start-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
19:
1338:San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
145:
112:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Radio Stations
47:
1308:Unknown-importance Radio station articles
1054:Fair use rationale for Image:KOME1998.JPG
828:Fair use rationale for Image:KOME1998.JPG
1214:Fair use rationale for Image:KOME90s.gif
682:Fair use rationale for Image:KOME90s.gif
660:What you guys seem to be addressing is
147:
49:
1323:Unknown-importance California articles
1134:Fair use rationale for Image:KOME2.gif
755:Fair use rationale for Image:KOME2.gif
222:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject California
974:Fair use rationale for Image:KOME.GIF
901:Fair use rationale for Image:KOME.GIF
7:
196:This article is within the scope of
92:This article is within the scope of
1313:WikiProject Radio Stations articles
115:Template:WikiProject Radio Stations
38:It is of interest to the following
1303:Start-Class Radio station articles
14:
279:San Francisco Bay Area task force
1261:. Using one of the templates at
1181:. Using one of the templates at
1101:. Using one of the templates at
1021:. Using one of the templates at
948:. Using one of the templates at
875:. Using one of the templates at
802:. Using one of the templates at
729:. Using one of the templates at
263:
183:
173:
149:
79:
69:
51:
20:
1343:WikiProject California articles
1318:Start-Class California articles
409:shoot a bolt of lightning at yo
225:Template:WikiProject California
1275:Media copyright questions page
1195:Media copyright questions page
1115:Media copyright questions page
1035:Media copyright questions page
962:Media copyright questions page
889:Media copyright questions page
816:Media copyright questions page
743:Media copyright questions page
1:
1244:boilerplate fair use template
1164:boilerplate fair use template
1084:boilerplate fair use template
1004:boilerplate fair use template
931:boilerplate fair use template
858:boilerplate fair use template
785:boilerplate fair use template
712:boilerplate fair use template
677:04:12, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
653:04:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
626:20:10, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
591:23:54, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
276:This article is supported by
271:San Francisco Bay Area portal
216:and see a list of open tasks.
106:and see a list of open tasks.
1271:criteria for speedy deletion
1191:criteria for speedy deletion
1111:criteria for speedy deletion
1031:criteria for speedy deletion
958:criteria for speedy deletion
885:criteria for speedy deletion
812:criteria for speedy deletion
739:criteria for speedy deletion
1289:19:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
1209:19:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
1129:19:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
1049:19:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
570:21:28, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
545:14:12, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
457:06:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
425:01:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
387:04:34, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
352:http://www.KNOWReunion.com/
330:19:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
315:01:21, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1359:
1255:the image description page
1175:the image description page
1095:the image description page
1015:the image description page
942:the image description page
869:the image description page
796:the image description page
723:the image description page
244:project's importance scale
134:project's importance scale
95:WikiProject Radio Stations
1257:and edit it to include a
1177:and edit it to include a
1097:and edit it to include a
1017:and edit it to include a
944:and edit it to include a
871:and edit it to include a
798:and edit it to include a
725:and edit it to include a
259:
241:
168:
131:
64:
46:
1236:explanation or rationale
1156:explanation or rationale
1076:explanation or rationale
996:explanation or rationale
969:04:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
923:explanation or rationale
896:04:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
850:explanation or rationale
823:04:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
777:explanation or rationale
750:04:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
704:explanation or rationale
431:Whew!: a sense of humor
415:"Beat It". Funny stuff.
1222:
1142:
1062:
982:
909:
836:
763:
690:
256:
199:WikiProject California
162:San Francisco Bay Area
118:Radio station articles
28:This article is rated
1238:as to why its use in
1221:
1158:as to why its use in
1141:
1078:as to why its use in
1061:
998:as to why its use in
981:
925:as to why its use in
908:
852:as to why its use in
835:
779:as to why its use in
762:
706:as to why its use in
689:
578:Radio stations policy
563:www.wikitimescale.org
255:
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
413:on Michael Jackson's
553:Hello Fightinirish,
489:Added Wiki link to
228:California articles
1259:fair use rationale
1223:
1179:fair use rationale
1143:
1099:fair use rationale
1067:Image:KOME1998.JPG
1063:
1019:fair use rationale
983:
946:fair use rationale
910:
873:fair use rationale
841:Image:KOME1998.JPG
837:
800:fair use rationale
764:
727:fair use rationale
691:
257:
34:content assessment
1227:Image:KOME90s.gif
695:Image:KOME90s.gif
298:
297:
294:
293:
290:
289:
191:California portal
144:
143:
140:
139:
1350:
1234:but there is no
1154:but there is no
1074:but there is no
994:but there is no
921:but there is no
848:but there is no
775:but there is no
702:but there is no
273:
268:
267:
266:
230:
229:
226:
223:
220:
193:
188:
187:
186:
177:
170:
169:
164:
153:
146:
120:
119:
116:
113:
110:
89:
84:
83:
82:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1358:
1357:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1293:
1292:
1216:
1147:Image:KOME2.gif
1136:
1056:
976:
903:
830:
768:Image:KOME2.gif
757:
684:
580:
535:... er MySpace.
433:
414:
354:
337:
322:
303:
269:
264:
262:
227:
224:
221:
218:
217:
189:
184:
182:
159:
117:
114:
111:
108:
107:
85:
80:
78:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1356:
1354:
1346:
1345:
1340:
1335:
1330:
1325:
1320:
1315:
1310:
1305:
1295:
1294:
1281:BetacommandBot
1215:
1212:
1201:BetacommandBot
1135:
1132:
1121:BetacommandBot
1055:
1052:
1041:BetacommandBot
987:Image:KOME.GIF
975:
972:
966:BetacommandBot
914:Image:KOME.GIF
902:
899:
893:BetacommandBot
829:
826:
820:BetacommandBot
756:
753:
747:BetacommandBot
683:
680:
658:
657:
656:
655:
629:
628:
579:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
554:
548:
547:
537:
536:
528:
527:
523:
522:
518:
517:
513:
512:
504:
503:
499:
498:
486:
485:
477:
476:
472:
471:
467:
466:
432:
429:
428:
427:
417:
416:
412:
404:
403:
398:
397:
391:
350:
336:
333:
321:
318:
302:
299:
296:
295:
292:
291:
288:
287:
284:Low-importance
275:
274:
258:
248:
247:
240:
234:
233:
231:
214:the discussion
195:
194:
178:
166:
165:
154:
142:
141:
138:
137:
130:
124:
123:
121:
109:Radio Stations
104:the discussion
100:radio stations
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
59:Radio Stations
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1355:
1344:
1341:
1339:
1336:
1334:
1331:
1329:
1326:
1324:
1321:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1311:
1309:
1306:
1304:
1301:
1300:
1298:
1291:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1277:. Thank you.
1276:
1272:
1266:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1253:Please go to
1251:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1228:
1220:
1213:
1211:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1197:. Thank you.
1196:
1192:
1186:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1173:Please go to
1171:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1148:
1140:
1133:
1131:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1117:. Thank you.
1116:
1112:
1106:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1093:Please go to
1091:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1068:
1060:
1053:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1037:. Thank you.
1036:
1032:
1026:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1013:Please go to
1011:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
988:
980:
973:
971:
970:
967:
963:
959:
956:described on
953:
951:
947:
943:
940:Please go to
938:
936:
932:
928:
924:
920:
916:
915:
907:
900:
898:
897:
894:
890:
886:
883:described on
880:
878:
874:
870:
867:Please go to
865:
863:
859:
855:
851:
847:
843:
842:
834:
827:
825:
824:
821:
817:
813:
810:described on
807:
805:
801:
797:
794:Please go to
792:
790:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
769:
761:
754:
752:
751:
748:
744:
740:
737:described on
734:
732:
728:
724:
721:Please go to
719:
717:
713:
709:
705:
701:
697:
696:
688:
681:
679:
678:
675:
669:
665:
663:
654:
651:
647:
642:
637:
633:
632:
631:
630:
627:
624:
623:Fightingirish
620:
616:
612:
608:
604:
600:
595:
594:
593:
592:
589:
585:
577:
571:
568:
564:
560:
555:
552:
551:
550:
549:
546:
543:
542:Fightingirish
539:
538:
534:
530:
529:
525:
524:
520:
519:
515:
514:
510:
506:
505:
501:
500:
496:
492:
488:
487:
483:
479:
478:
474:
473:
469:
468:
464:
463:
462:
461:
458:
455:
451:
448:
444:
441:
437:
430:
426:
423:
422:Fightingirish
419:
418:
410:
406:
405:
400:
399:
394:
393:
392:
389:
388:
385:
382:
378:
376:
372:
368:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
334:
332:
331:
328:
327:Fightingirish
319:
317:
316:
312:
309:
300:
285:
282:(assessed as
281:
280:
272:
261:
254:
250:
249:
245:
239:
236:
235:
232:
215:
211:
210:
205:
201:
200:
192:
181:
179:
176:
172:
171:
167:
163:
158:
155:
152:
148:
135:
129:
126:
125:
122:
105:
101:
97:
96:
88:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1279:
1267:
1252:
1239:
1225:
1224:
1199:
1187:
1172:
1159:
1145:
1144:
1119:
1107:
1092:
1079:
1065:
1064:
1039:
1027:
1012:
999:
985:
984:
964:. Thank you.
954:
939:
926:
912:
911:
891:. Thank you.
881:
866:
853:
839:
838:
818:. Thank you.
808:
793:
780:
766:
765:
745:. Thank you.
735:
720:
707:
693:
692:
670:
666:
659:
645:
640:
639:conceivably
635:
581:
533:SpywareSpace
532:
452:
449:
445:
442:
438:
434:
408:
390:
379:
373:
369:
366:
362:
358:
355:
346:
342:
338:
323:
304:
277:
207:
197:
93:
87:Radio portal
40:WikiProjects
30:Start-class
1297:Categories
335:Yes and No
219:California
209:California
204:U.S. state
157:California
1248:fair use
1232:fair use
1168:fair use
1152:fair use
1088:fair use
1072:fair use
1008:fair use
992:fair use
935:fair use
919:fair use
862:fair use
846:fair use
789:fair use
773:fair use
716:fair use
700:fair use
674:CyclePat
567:CyclePat
662:WP:NPOV
650:Bearcat
588:Bearcat
559:WP:CITE
495:KMPX-FM
320:Rewrite
308:Bubba73
636:always
613:, and
497:alone.
460:(talk)
450:--JWW
384:(talk)
311:(talk)
36:scale.
646:seems
1285:talk
1240:this
1205:talk
1160:this
1125:talk
1080:this
1045:talk
1000:this
927:this
854:this
781:this
708:this
641:have
619:here
615:KMET
611:KQAK
607:KQLZ
603:KNAC
599:WMAQ
584:KUFX
509:KMET
491:KIFR
482:KSJO
454:Jay
381:Jay
301:POV
238:???
206:of
128:???
1299::
1287:)
1250:.
1207:)
1170:.
1127:)
1090:.
1047:)
1010:.
937:.
864:.
791:.
718:.
609:,
605:,
601:,
377:.
325:--
313:,
286:).
160::
1283:(
1203:(
1123:(
1043:(
246:.
136:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.