112:
303:. Facts cannot be copyrighted, only their particular expression. Unless I'm missing something, the expression of facts in this article is clearly different than the expression of the facts at the station website. At any rate, even if there are parts of this article which may violate copyright (I have not examined every single biographical entry, but a sample of them), the entire article is not a violation and problems can be fixed by removing or rewriting any parts that may violate copyright.
217:
50:
207:
186:
102:
21:
81:
318:
I disagree with you completely, and this goes for all of these articles. Even though the text was re-written in some areas, it was still pulled from the websites of these stations. As far as I'm concerned, that's plagarism. An even bigger issue is the notablilty of these articles -- they're not
362:
less than 14 hours later. As for whether "no one really cares about" this content, that's not for you to unilaterally decide. Several people have been making constructive edits to these articles, so obviously at least someone cares about them.
345:
Plagiarism is not the same as copyright violation. The solution to plagiarism is to cite the source if it was not already cited; if the source is cited then it is not plagiarism, but research. Also, regardless of who created the article over
319:
notable enough to keep as stand-alone entries. The names can be merged into the individual station articles, without all that extra stuff that no one really cares about. Also take into consideration that
355:
31:
168:
273:
394:
158:
404:
399:
263:
134:
409:
239:
389:
125:
86:
230:
191:
61:
27:
67:
49:
324:
332:
238:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
133:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
354:
by many editors since then. If notability is the issue, that could have been resolved by allowing the
20:
117:
368:
308:
222:
328:
320:
372:
336:
312:
383:
364:
304:
130:
295:
How is this a copyright violation? This article paraphrases and summarizes the
235:
212:
206:
185:
107:
101:
80:
323:
was outed as a sockpuppet of a notorious
Knowledge (XXG) abuser,
360:
merge proposal to be considered before nominating for deletion
43:
15:
359:
351:
300:
234:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
129:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
60:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
8:
358:to run its course, or better, allowing your
180:
75:
143:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Philadelphia
182:
77:
248:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Journalism
228:This redirect is within the scope of
123:This redirect is within the scope of
47:
7:
395:Low-importance Philadelphia articles
321:the user who created these articles
66:It is of interest to the following
405:Low-importance Journalism articles
400:Redirect-Class Journalism articles
14:
146:Template:WikiProject Philadelphia
268:This redirect has been rated as
215:
205:
184:
163:This redirect has been rated as
110:
100:
79:
48:
19:
410:WikiProject Journalism articles
251:Template:WikiProject Journalism
30:on 23 July 2006. The result of
26:This article was nominated for
390:NA-Class Philadelphia articles
1:
373:10:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
337:06:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
313:02:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
242:and see a list of open tasks.
137:and see a list of open tasks.
426:
274:project's importance scale
169:project's importance scale
267:
200:
162:
95:
74:
126:WikiProject Philadelphia
231:WikiProject Journalism
149:Philadelphia articles
301:http://cbs3.com/bios
291:Copyright violation?
254:Journalism articles
118:Philadelphia portal
62:content assessment
350:ago, it has been
325:Spotteddogsdototg
288:
287:
284:
283:
280:
279:
223:Journalism portal
179:
178:
175:
174:
42:
41:
417:
256:
255:
252:
249:
246:
225:
220:
219:
218:
209:
202:
201:
196:
188:
181:
151:
150:
147:
144:
141:
120:
115:
114:
113:
104:
97:
96:
91:
83:
76:
53:
52:
44:
23:
16:
425:
424:
420:
419:
418:
416:
415:
414:
380:
379:
293:
253:
250:
247:
244:
243:
221:
216:
214:
194:
148:
145:
142:
139:
138:
116:
111:
109:
89:
12:
11:
5:
423:
421:
413:
412:
407:
402:
397:
392:
382:
381:
378:
377:
376:
375:
352:edited heavily
340:
339:
292:
289:
286:
285:
282:
281:
278:
277:
270:Low-importance
266:
260:
259:
257:
240:the discussion
227:
226:
210:
198:
197:
195:Low‑importance
189:
177:
176:
173:
172:
165:Low-importance
161:
155:
154:
152:
135:the discussion
122:
121:
105:
93:
92:
90:Low‑importance
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
422:
411:
408:
406:
403:
401:
398:
396:
393:
391:
388:
387:
385:
374:
370:
366:
361:
357:
353:
349:
344:
343:
342:
341:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
317:
316:
315:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
290:
275:
271:
265:
262:
261:
258:
241:
237:
233:
232:
224:
213:
211:
208:
204:
203:
199:
193:
190:
187:
183:
170:
166:
160:
157:
156:
153:
136:
132:
128:
127:
119:
108:
106:
103:
99:
98:
94:
88:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
59:
55:
51:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
347:
296:
294:
269:
229:
164:
140:Philadelphia
131:Philadelphia
124:
87:Philadelphia
68:WikiProjects
57:
35:
329:Rollosmokes
384:Categories
245:Journalism
236:journalism
192:Journalism
348:16 months
299:found at
58:redirect
28:deletion
365:DHowell
305:DHowell
272:on the
167:on the
64:scale.
297:facts
56:This
369:talk
333:talk
309:talk
36:KEEP
34:was
356:AfD
327:.
264:Low
159:Low
386::
371:)
335:)
311:)
367:(
331:(
307:(
276:.
171:.
70::
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
