Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Koch Rajbongshi people

Source 📝

303:
Koch tribe is government recognised ST in Meghalaya. In my opinion, Koch people page should exist because Koch is government notified scheduled tribe. Rajbongshi have redirected Koch people page into Rajbongshi page. So, Koch tribe can't be search easily. Koch tribe is being hidden by Rajbongshi . In simple word, Koch tribe is scheduled tribe with history and known origin . But Rajbongshi are people with confusing origin. If Rajbongshi are koch , Rajbongshi should be treated as part of Koch. And Koch page shouldn't be redirected to Rajbongshi page. Thanks
158: 22: 80: 53: 90: 417:
All the works they did relys on previous works,books,journals etc hence it is still a debatable topic.It is believed that when the koch people of West Bengal,Bangladesh,Bihar started living with other communities they suffered from a lot of discrimination and they were considered as "lower caste",
302:
Koch tribe is aboriginal tribe of India, Nepal and Bangladesh. Rajbongshi are either very different people or section of Koch-Mech people who write Rajbanshi title. So, Rajbanshi can be treated as section of Koch or Rajbongshi are just title of some unknown origin people. Koch tribe have history.
334:
They are SC . And they have different origin. These page is giving Koch related information. Which is absolutely incorrect. They should either write all this in Koch-Rajbansi page or Koch page. But In this page. All these are unrelated
507: 349:
Lets see what people decide. Since Rajbangshi/Rangpuri are treated as a separate group in Nepal and Bengal, the Koch related stuff may be deleted from this article. BUt after the discussion at INB. -
432:
I know everything. There is Koch , Mech , Koch-Mech origin Rajvamsi , Jhalo-Malo Rajbongshi , Rajbongshi etc. Rajbongshi isn't only koch origin. 12 Mech chieftain aslo became Rajvamsi in past
492: 396:
Dibrugarh publication. Dibrugarh university already have record of money earn PhD scholars. If Rajbongshi are Koch origin then Rajbongshi use Koch word in front of them.
502: 497: 172: 320:
Rajbongshi/Rangpuri are an Indo-Aryan speaking community treated separately in Nepal, Bangladesh and West Bengal (where they enjoy Scheduled Caste status). -
512: 148: 167: 63: 487: 482: 138: 198: 517: 33: 113: 103: 58: 369: 209: 418:
hence they started calling themselves "Rajbongshi" instead of "Koch" that's why the 'Khsatriya' Movement also took place.
446:
You can't claim to know everything. Provide sources first. And don't keep spamming every talk. Keep the discussion at
455: 354: 325: 201: 39: 437: 401: 340: 308: 21: 451: 350: 321: 297: 372:
It's Clearly Mentioned Here That No One Can Seperate The History Between "Koch" and "Rajbongshi" -
433: 423: 412: 397: 377: 336: 304: 278: 232: 246:
I have just stubbed Rajbanshi - it was a copyright violation of a paper published in 2009. -
251: 447: 157: 370:
http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.%2024%20Issue3/Series-8/C2403081014.pdf
269: 476: 419: 391: 373: 274: 95: 459: 441: 427: 405: 381: 358: 344: 329: 312: 282: 255: 238: 218: 266:
Essay the first; On the Kocch, Bódo and Dhimál tribes, in three parts .. (1847)
247: 262:
Essay the first; On the Kocch, Bódo and Dhimál tribes, in three parts .. (1847)
85: 79: 52: 111:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 191: 108: 15: 291:
Koch is subset of Rajbanshi or Rajbanshi is subset of Koch ?
156: 508:
Redirect-Class Indian history articles of Low-importance
107:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of 270:
https://archive.org/details/essayfirstonkoc00hodggoog
493:Redirect-Class India articles of Low-importance 32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s 8: 227:with a substantial cleanup of the article.-- 203: 199:WP:Articles for deletion/Koch Royal Family 47: 49: 503:Low-importance Indian history articles 498:Redirect-Class Indian history articles 101:This redirect is within the scope of 19: 7: 513:WikiProject Indian history articles 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 123:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject India 143:This redirect has been rated as 88: 78: 51: 20: 165:This redirect is supported by 1: 488:Low-importance India articles 483:Redirect-Class India articles 256:12:34, 18 October 2013 (UTC) 239:03:30, 18 October 2013 (UTC) 219:23:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC) 168:the Indian history workgroup 534: 518:WikiProject India articles 149:project's importance scale 126:Template:WikiProject India 460:14:34, 11 July 2019 (UTC) 442:12:14, 11 July 2019 (UTC) 428:11:58, 11 July 2019 (UTC) 406:11:27, 11 July 2019 (UTC) 382:19:00, 10 July 2019 (UTC) 359:18:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC) 345:18:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC) 330:17:41, 10 July 2019 (UTC) 283:23:05, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 164: 142: 73: 46: 313:20:44, 6 May 2019 (UTC) 161: 160: 190:Proposed merge with 162: 34:content assessment 187: 186: 183: 182: 179: 178: 104:WikiProject India 525: 452:Fylindfotberserk 416: 395: 351:Fylindfotberserk 322:Fylindfotberserk 301: 298:Fylindfotberserk 230: 205: 131: 130: 127: 124: 121: 98: 93: 92: 91: 82: 75: 74: 69: 66: 55: 48: 25: 24: 16: 533: 532: 528: 527: 526: 524: 523: 522: 473: 472: 410: 389: 295: 293: 264: 237: 228: 206: 195: 128: 125: 122: 119: 118: 94: 89: 87: 67: 61: 12: 11: 5: 531: 529: 521: 520: 515: 510: 505: 500: 495: 490: 485: 475: 474: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 366: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 332: 292: 289: 287: 263: 260: 259: 258: 241: 231: 202: 194: 188: 185: 184: 181: 180: 177: 176: 173:Low-importance 163: 153: 152: 145:Low-importance 141: 135: 134: 132: 129:India articles 100: 99: 83: 71: 70: 68:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 530: 519: 516: 514: 511: 509: 506: 504: 501: 499: 496: 494: 491: 489: 486: 484: 481: 480: 478: 461: 457: 453: 449: 445: 444: 443: 439: 435: 434:PerfectingNEI 431: 430: 429: 425: 421: 414: 413:PerfectingNEI 409: 408: 407: 403: 399: 398:PerfectingNEI 393: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 379: 375: 371: 360: 356: 352: 348: 347: 346: 342: 338: 337:PerfectingNEI 333: 331: 327: 323: 319: 318: 317: 316: 315: 314: 310: 306: 305:PerfectingNEI 299: 290: 288: 285: 284: 280: 276: 272: 271: 267: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 242: 240: 236: 235: 226: 223: 222: 221: 220: 216: 215: 214: 207: 200: 193: 189: 174: 171:(assessed as 170: 169: 159: 155: 154: 150: 146: 140: 137: 136: 133: 116: 115: 110: 106: 105: 97: 86: 84: 81: 77: 76: 72: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 31: 27: 23: 18: 17: 367: 294: 286: 273: 268: 265: 243: 233: 224: 212: 211: 196: 166: 144: 114:project page 112: 102: 96:India portal 40:WikiProjects 29: 477:Categories 368:Look Here 420:Robo Zay 392:Robo Zay 374:Robo Zay 213:Hasirpad 210:call me 30:redirect 275:Rajmaan 244:Comment 229:Vigyani 225:Support 147:on the 64:History 448:WP:INB 248:Sitush 36:scale. 204:הסרפד 192:Kocha 120:India 109:India 59:India 28:This 456:talk 438:talk 424:talk 402:talk 378:talk 355:talk 341:talk 326:talk 309:talk 279:talk 252:talk 234:talk 197:See 139:Low 479:: 458:) 450:- 440:) 426:) 404:) 380:) 357:) 343:) 328:) 311:) 281:) 254:) 217:) 175:). 62:: 454:( 436:( 422:( 415:: 411:@ 400:( 394:: 390:@ 376:( 353:( 339:( 324:( 307:( 300:: 296:@ 277:( 250:( 208:( 151:. 117:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
India
History
WikiProject icon
India portal
WikiProject India
India
project page
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
the Indian history workgroup
Low-importance
Kocha
WP:Articles for deletion/Koch Royal Family
הסרפד
call me Hasirpad
23:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
talk
03:30, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Sitush
talk
12:34, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
https://archive.org/details/essayfirstonkoc00hodggoog
Rajmaan
talk
23:05, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.