1617:
avant-garde noise outfit, a funk crew, a synth-rock band, a hardcore band, a deeply psychedelic band"; from
Rolling Stone: "a genre-shuffle that added Portuguese balladry and soulful crooning to the band's militantly eclectic agenda". I believe any source which is ascribing a singular genre to the record is doing so on basis of an individual song, which is as accurate as describing an album as "instrumental" just because one track is.
21:
64:
892:
866:
832:
775:
751:
729:
707:
670:
640:
618:
555:
531:
169:
218:
200:
391:
1758:
genre warring. If it can't be accurately called any one thing, it makes sense to allow the prose to speak for itself. It existed in this fashion for years until a recent spree of reverts has seen the field being added in contradiction to the sources given. If it's a "waste of the community's time" to
1794:
If I could get anywhere by pointing at policies and having people actually discuss their edits we wouldn't be here, but I'm discussing something actually based in MOS principles while a user whose only contribution is to knee-jerk mash the undo button ignores every attempt to engage. Remind me again
1457:
by the article, is not helpful, and it's entirely counter to MOS practices. Reverting its removal as "unexplained" despite clear explanation is disingenuous. The actual prose of the article describes a "genre shuffle", a "breadth of genres", "multiple genres", etc, which would be a strong indication
1616:
I think the following may be worth bearing in mind--from AllMusic: "he tackles any genre put in front of him -- romantic love songs, bile-spitting rants of hate ... gospel, and breezy pop"; from Spin: "the music still careens from genre to genre"; from Metal Hammer: " a pop band, a rock band, an
945:-based" rather than "American", it seems more relevant to their leanings than something as broad as a country ("American" music is pretty wide spectrum depending on your home city/state, it seems). I took the genre out as a lot of FNM articles are the subject of an endless
139:
1713:- an overview, not all encompassing. And music genre is subjective, not absolute. Your conclusion comes off as somewhere between being deliberately obtuse, misguided, or not really looking to work with others here. I wont discuss further, as this is bordering on
1836:
1452:
that an infobox should be used "to summarize (and not supplant) key facts that appear in the article". Sticking a genre field into the infobox which is in no way supported by the article itself, and is in fact directly
1501:
Given the article's prose clearly discusses a breadth of genres and no sourced prose is given over to categorising the album as any one distinct thing, should an infobox genre field be omitted here in accordance with
396:
311:
Its relevant if sources can be found that suggest its relevant, which for their previous albums I have. I also wouldn't consider a third to two fifths of the members of the bands a minimal connection. —
74:
949:
over precise genres; I felt it best to just let the discussion of the actual music take precedence without listing a genre that will no doubt be changed thirty times back and forth by IP editors. :(
1525:
1507:
1482:
660:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
401:
1524:. The field does not summarise any information discussed in the article and adds nothing of encyclopaedic value. It is in fact directly contradicted by the prose which is sourced.
657:
1759:
attempt to mediate, to attempt to discuss on talk pages, to attempt to actually follow the site's own internal style guide, then I don't understand what wikipedia has become.
1841:
1529:
1511:
1486:
540:
580:
429:
1335:
1331:
1317:
447:
124:
1130:
Have expanded it with an extra parapgraph worth of stuff and broken it into two subheadings; if it still feels a bit brief I can see what else I could dig up.
419:
1831:
1481:) is refusing to engage and is instead resorting to attacks on character, I am going to open an RFC on whether this field belongs in the article or not.
849:
1307:
1297:
584:
576:
350:
The album's CD liner notes don't say, and my copy of the LP doesn't have any liner notes with it. Odds are there's no official credit given for it,
568:
1796:
1760:
1696:
1656:
1618:
1583:
1281:
1851:
293:
1463:
282:
I don't see how it's relevant, since the bands are only minimally connected (via Patton and
Spruance). Patton's own highly experimental
50:
879:
336:
1448:
Bringing this here because apparently edit summaries and an in-article edit note aren't enough. The manual of style is very clear at
1313:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
468:
234:
1846:
1821:
1022:
Linked at first reference, didn't realise I hadn't done so. Reworded the date for it to draw more attention to the release year.
572:
1751:
761:
424:
229:, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the
38:
1635:. Got sources that directly state a genre? Add it to the infobox. Got a source with a more nuanced view? Add it to the prose.
1458:
that shoehorning in some information which is not discussed in prose is not actually reflective of the subject, and is merely
679:
1774:
It's a waste of time to spend so much time on such a non-issue. And it's hard to believe your intention is not edit warring
1597:
841:
32:
1600:, so I certainly support its inclusion. If the others are this clear cut, I'll just revise my stance to "Yes" I suppose.
1826:
1378:
230:
225:
205:
180:
1308:
http://web.archive.org/web/20161215132619/http%3A//teamrock.com/feature/2016-12-14/the-10-essential-alt-metal-albums
1692:
853:
649:
1582:
If it helps, the sources (see
Rolling Stone and AllMusic, for example) explicitly describe it as a mix of styles.
1298:
https://web.archive.org/web/20101210220222/http://www.metalhammer.co.uk/news/story-behind-the-album-faith-no-more/
653:
564:
1669:
Then add all the infobox content in the prose too. It'd be one thing if the content was truly contradictory ie "
1334:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1091:
Must have overlooked that; the German chart site doesn't actually list it as having charted at all. :/ Removed.
1800:
1764:
1700:
1695:
to add anything in support of it, and unless that is done then the current field still falls afoul of the MOS.
1660:
1622:
1587:
297:
1562:- Is there a reliable source that directly calls the album itself a genre? If so, then yes. If not, then no.
1467:
1369:
1289:
946:
845:
738:
601:
340:
1784:
1723:
1714:
1681:
1641:
1606:
1568:
1548:
1301:
788:
716:
443:
283:
272:
Should it be mentioned that around this time, Mr. Bungle also released their most experimental record? -
1353:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1341:
1258:
1220:
1168:
483:
462:
186:
84:
80:
20:
1288:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1804:
1789:
1768:
1728:
1704:
1686:
1664:
1646:
1626:
1611:
1591:
1573:
1552:
1533:
1515:
1490:
1471:
1438:
1383:
1262:
1248:
1224:
1196:
1172:
1149:
1110:
1074:
1041:
1008:
968:
487:
472:
369:
344:
322:
301:
276:
63:
289:
1239:
1187:
1140:
1101:
1065:
1032:
999:
959:
360:
1543:. To me it seems clear enough that there are songs of many genres, but not a genre for the album.
1652:
1503:
1478:
1449:
875:
1675:
said the album was "definitely not prog rock material". But that doesn't appear to be the case.
1430:
1338:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1354:
1779:
1776:
given the level of edit warring over this point by IP addresses that write the same way you do
1718:
1676:
1636:
1601:
1563:
1544:
626:. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
273:
88:
42:
1254:
1216:
1164:
816:
812:
479:
458:
1361:
1434:
820:
765:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
1710:
1459:
1320:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1230:
1178:
1131:
1092:
1056:
1023:
990:
950:
627:
504:
351:
313:
1360:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1815:
1671:
1209:
1049:
942:
932:
1327:
1229:
Thanks. Cited that, was just the same source as the one used for the paragraph.
1655:, then it shouldn't be summarised there. They shouldn't contradict each other.
1326:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1052:
was a close friend of Bottum's. - In the lede you have him as Cobain's friend
936:
217:
199:
982:
Martin had already begun skipping practice sessions with the band," in 1993?
931:
Should definitely have the nationality, genre too probably. Compare with FAs
1837:
Knowledge featured topics King for a Day... Fool for a
Lifetime good content
1651:
However, if the article doesn't actually discuss what the infobox says, per
737:. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
450:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
83:. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the
787:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
1302:
http://www.metalhammer.co.uk/news/story-behind-the-album-faith-no-more/
985:
1992ish; I've directly mentioned that it was during the recording of
335:
Does anybody know the background singers at the end of Just A Man? --
1177:
Thanks for having a look at this one for me. I appreciate it.
162:
1598:
this pretty directly calls the album a progressive rock album
1415:(applemusic, spotify, allmusic, music.youtube, amazonmusic)
1717:
type stuff, and generally a waste of the community's time.
1292:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
233:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
1691:
Given that I believe it to be a disingenuous conclusion,
1124:
No information where the album was recorded and the like?
286:
came out the next year, but I wouldn't mention it here.
1775:
1285:
1215:
tag to deal with (direct quote, so needs a citation) —
117:
1497:
RFC on the inclusion of a "genre" field in the infobox
1127:
All in all the production section is a little light.
1462:
behaviour that serves no one. Can this please stop.
1019:
recording session" - Huh, when? Link (if available)
1330:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1709:I see no contradiction here. Infoboxes are like a
541:understandable to an appropriately broad audience
1754:with no such genre field, the intention is to
1316:This message was posted before February 2018.
448:Talk:King for a Day... Fool for a Lifetime/GA1
48:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
1404:(wikipedia, musicbrainz, faithnomore.fandom)
8:
379:
194:
96:
15:
1280:I have just modified 2 external links on
1795:why burnout is such a factor in editors
1401:"King for a Day... Fool for a Lifetime"
497:
1842:Mid-importance Featured topics articles
1477:Given that the primary bad actor here (
410:
382:
196:
1526:2A02:C7E:329F:5A00:5C9D:6C90:2658:2581
1508:2A02:C7E:329F:5A00:5C9D:6C90:2658:2581
1483:2A02:C7E:329F:5A00:5C9D:6C90:2658:2581
1412:"King for a Day, Fool for a Lifetime"
1423:"King for a Day Fool for a Lifetime"
1282:King for a Day... Fool for a Lifetime
1055:Have amended the lead to match this.
75:King for a Day... Fool for a Lifetime
70:King for a Day... Fool for a Lifetime
27:King for a Day... Fool for a Lifetime
7:
1631:It's pretty standard protocol to do
543:; spelling and grammar are correct.
223:This article is within the scope of
168:
166:
539:. the prose is clear, concise, and
185:It is of interest to the following
87:. If you can update or improve it,
14:
1832:GA-Class Featured topics articles
1284:. Please take a moment to review
41:. If you can improve it further,
890:
864:
830:
773:
749:
727:
705:
668:
638:
616:
553:
529:
331:Background singers in Just a Man
216:
198:
167:
62:
19:
1306:Corrected formatting/usage for
1088:Reference for German charting?
794:Nothing but constructive edits
658:could reasonably be challenged
277:06:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
29:has been listed as one of the
1:
1472:21:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
1253:Alright, looks good to go! —
850:valid non-free use rationales
1439:17:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
891:
865:
831:
774:
750:
728:
706:
669:
639:
617:
554:
530:
243:Knowledge:WikiProject Albums
1852:WikiProject Albums articles
1750:Given that the article was
323:09:50, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
302:17:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
246:Template:WikiProject Albums
72:is the main article in the
1868:
1805:21:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
1790:21:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
1769:20:56, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
1729:20:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
1705:20:43, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
1687:20:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
1665:20:28, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
1647:20:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
1627:20:21, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
1612:20:14, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
1592:20:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
1574:20:07, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
1553:23:55, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
1347:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1277:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
797:
688:
628:the layout style guideline
593:
512:
499:
370:21:48, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
345:19:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
1534:23:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
1516:23:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
1491:23:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
1163:On hold for seven days —
503:
211:
193:
153:
99:
95:
1263:10:48, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
1249:10:15, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
1225:23:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
1197:17:15, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
1173:10:08, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
1150:17:14, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
1111:14:13, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
1075:14:10, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
1042:14:10, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
1009:14:10, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
969:14:10, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
500:
488:12:20, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
473:09:46, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
1847:GA-Class Album articles
1822:Knowledge good articles
1384:08:23, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
1273:External links modified
1205:Almost there, just one
878:to the topic, and have
563:. it complies with the
284:Adult Themes for Voice
175:This article is rated
1693:the onus is not on me
696:Broad in its coverage
478:I'll pick this up. —
39:good article criteria
1596:Doing a spot check,
1328:regular verification
791:or content dispute.
680:no original research
607:no original research
268:Mr. Bungle Influence
140:Good topic candidate
125:Good article nominee
1827:Music good articles
1752:assessed for review
1318:After February 2018
715:. it addresses the
656:. All content that
85:Knowledge community
33:Music good articles
1653:MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE
1504:MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE
1479:User:SpaceHelmetX1
1450:MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE
1389:Name of the album?
1372:InternetArchiveBot
1323:InternetArchiveBot
1158:Further discussion
902:Overall assessment
846:copyright statuses
807:, if possible, by
585:list incorporation
226:WikiProject Albums
181:content assessment
100:Article milestones
1444:Genres in infobox
1348:
1245:
1236:
1193:
1184:
1146:
1137:
1107:
1098:
1071:
1062:
1038:
1029:
1005:
996:
965:
956:
913:
912:
880:suitable captions
852:are provided for
438:
437:
366:
357:
304:
292:comment added by
265:
264:
261:
260:
257:
256:
161:
160:
149:
148:
57:
1859:
1787:
1782:
1726:
1721:
1684:
1679:
1644:
1639:
1609:
1604:
1571:
1566:
1382:
1373:
1346:
1345:
1324:
1246:
1241:
1237:
1232:
1214:
1208:
1194:
1189:
1185:
1180:
1147:
1142:
1138:
1133:
1108:
1103:
1099:
1094:
1072:
1067:
1063:
1058:
1039:
1034:
1030:
1025:
1006:
1001:
997:
992:
966:
961:
957:
952:
894:
893:
868:
867:
854:non-free content
834:
833:
777:
776:
753:
752:
731:
730:
709:
708:
672:
671:
650:reliable sources
642:
641:
620:
619:
557:
556:
533:
532:
498:
392:Copyvio detector
380:
367:
362:
358:
353:
320:
287:
251:
250:
247:
244:
241:
220:
213:
212:
202:
195:
178:
172:
171:
170:
163:
154:Current status:
120:
97:
66:
46:
23:
16:
1867:
1866:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1812:
1811:
1797:151.224.190.163
1785:
1780:
1761:151.224.190.163
1724:
1719:
1715:WP:GENREWARRIOR
1697:151.224.190.163
1682:
1677:
1657:151.224.190.163
1642:
1637:
1619:151.224.190.163
1607:
1602:
1584:151.224.190.163
1569:
1564:
1560:Conditional Yes
1499:
1446:
1391:
1376:
1371:
1339:
1332:have permission
1322:
1290:this simple FaQ
1275:
1240:
1231:
1212:
1206:
1188:
1179:
1160:
1141:
1132:
1121:
1102:
1093:
1085:
1066:
1057:
1033:
1024:
1000:
991:
960:
951:
923:
918:
567:guidelines for
565:Manual of Style
509:Review Comment
496:
442:This review is
434:
406:
378:
361:
352:
333:
314:
270:
248:
245:
242:
239:
238:
179:on Knowledge's
176:
116:
12:
11:
5:
1865:
1863:
1855:
1854:
1849:
1844:
1839:
1834:
1829:
1824:
1814:
1813:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1577:
1576:
1556:
1555:
1537:
1536:
1498:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1445:
1442:
1421:
1420:
1410:
1409:
1399:
1398:
1390:
1387:
1366:
1365:
1358:
1311:
1310:
1304:
1296:Added archive
1274:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1159:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1125:
1120:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1084:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1013:
1012:
1011:
979:
978:
974:
973:
972:
971:
928:
927:
922:
919:
917:
914:
911:
910:
905:
895:
887:
886:
885:Good, I think
883:
869:
861:
860:
857:
835:
827:
826:
824:
799:
796:
795:
792:
778:
770:
769:
766:
754:
746:
745:
742:
732:
724:
723:
720:
719:of the topic.
710:
702:
701:
699:
690:
687:
686:
683:
678:. it contains
673:
665:
664:
661:
643:
635:
634:
631:
621:
613:
612:
610:
595:
592:
591:
588:
577:words to watch
558:
550:
549:
544:
534:
526:
525:
523:
514:
511:
510:
507:
502:
495:
492:
491:
490:
453:
452:
436:
435:
433:
432:
427:
422:
416:
413:
412:
408:
407:
405:
404:
402:External links
399:
394:
388:
385:
384:
377:
374:
373:
372:
332:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
306:
305:
294:76.167.136.139
269:
266:
263:
262:
259:
258:
255:
254:
252:
249:Album articles
221:
209:
208:
203:
191:
190:
184:
173:
159:
158:
151:
150:
147:
146:
143:
136:
135:March 27, 2022
132:
131:
128:
121:
113:
112:
109:
106:
102:
101:
93:
92:
67:
59:
58:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1864:
1853:
1850:
1848:
1845:
1843:
1840:
1838:
1835:
1833:
1830:
1828:
1825:
1823:
1820:
1819:
1817:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1788:
1783:
1777:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1757:
1753:
1730:
1727:
1722:
1716:
1712:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1702:
1698:
1694:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1685:
1680:
1674:
1673:
1672:Rolling Stone
1668:
1667:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1645:
1640:
1634:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1610:
1605:
1599:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1575:
1572:
1567:
1561:
1558:
1557:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1539:
1538:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1464:2.222.160.197
1461:
1456:
1451:
1443:
1441:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1427:
1424:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1413:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1402:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1388:
1386:
1385:
1380:
1375:
1374:
1363:
1359:
1356:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1343:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1319:
1314:
1309:
1305:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1278:
1272:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1247:
1244:
1238:
1235:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1211:
1204:
1203:
1198:
1195:
1192:
1186:
1183:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1161:
1157:
1151:
1148:
1145:
1139:
1136:
1129:
1128:
1126:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1112:
1109:
1106:
1100:
1097:
1090:
1089:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1076:
1073:
1070:
1064:
1061:
1054:
1053:
1051:
1050:Courtney Love
1047:
1043:
1040:
1037:
1031:
1028:
1021:
1020:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1007:
1004:
998:
995:
988:
984:
983:
981:
980:
976:
975:
970:
967:
964:
958:
955:
948:
944:
943:San Francisco
941:I went with "
940:
939:
938:
934:
930:
929:
925:
924:
920:
915:
909:
906:
903:
899:
896:
889:
888:
884:
881:
877:
873:
870:
863:
862:
858:
855:
851:
847:
843:
839:
836:
829:
828:
825:
822:
818:
814:
810:
806:
803:
800:
798:
793:
790:
786:
782:
779:
772:
771:
767:
764:
763:
758:
755:
748:
747:
743:
740:
739:summary style
736:
733:
726:
725:
721:
718:
714:
711:
704:
703:
700:
697:
694:
691:
689:
684:
681:
677:
674:
667:
666:
662:
659:
655:
651:
647:
644:
637:
636:
632:
629:
625:
622:
615:
614:
611:
608:
604:
603:
599:
596:
594:
589:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
569:lead sections
566:
562:
559:
552:
551:
548:
545:
542:
538:
535:
528:
527:
524:
521:
518:
515:
513:
508:
506:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
476:
475:
474:
470:
467:
464:
460:
457:
451:
449:
445:
440:
439:
431:
428:
426:
423:
421:
418:
417:
415:
414:
409:
403:
400:
398:
395:
393:
390:
389:
387:
386:
381:
375:
371:
368:
365:
359:
356:
349:
348:
347:
346:
342:
338:
330:
324:
321:
319:
318:
310:
309:
308:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
285:
281:
280:
279:
278:
275:
267:
253:
236:
232:
228:
227:
222:
219:
215:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
197:
192:
188:
182:
174:
165:
164:
157:
152:
144:
142:
141:
137:
134:
133:
129:
127:
126:
122:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
103:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
76:
71:
68:
65:
61:
60:
55:
53:
52:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1781:Sergecross73
1755:
1749:
1720:Sergecross73
1678:Sergecross73
1670:
1638:Sergecross73
1632:
1603:Sergecross73
1565:Sergecross73
1559:
1545:Doctorhawkes
1540:
1521:
1500:
1454:
1447:
1428:
1425:
1422:
1414:
1411:
1403:
1400:
1392:
1370:
1367:
1342:source check
1321:
1315:
1312:
1279:
1276:
1242:
1233:
1190:
1181:
1143:
1134:
1104:
1095:
1068:
1059:
1035:
1026:
1016:
1015:"during the
1002:
993:
986:
962:
953:
933:Kala (album)
907:
901:
897:
874:. media are
871:
840:. media are
837:
808:
804:
801:
784:
780:
760:
756:
734:
717:main aspects
712:
695:
692:
675:
654:cited inline
645:
623:
606:
600:
597:
560:
546:
536:
520:Well-written
519:
516:
465:
455:
454:
441:
430:Instructions
363:
354:
337:88.74.232.13
334:
316:
315:
274:ZEROpumpkins
271:
231:project page
224:
187:WikiProjects
156:Good article
155:
138:
123:
118:July 6, 2012
89:please do so
73:
69:
49:
47:
43:please do so
31:
30:
26:
1255:Crisco 1492
1217:Crisco 1492
1165:Crisco 1492
1048:whose wife
844:with their
805:Illustrated
480:Crisco 1492
459:Crisco 1492
444:transcluded
288:—Preceding
1816:Categories
1426:(discogs)
1379:Report bug
1017:Angel Dust
987:Angel Dust
977:Production
937:Is This It
602:Verifiable
397:Authorship
383:GA toolbox
235:discussion
81:good topic
37:under the
1429:and WHY?
1362:this tool
1355:this tool
547:See below
505:Attribute
494:Checklist
456:Reviewer:
420:Templates
411:Reviewing
376:GA Review
317:Balthazar
1368:Cheers.—
947:edit war
916:Comments
876:relevant
811:such as
789:edit war
469:contribs
425:Criteria
290:unsigned
177:GA-class
145:Promoted
51:reassess
1711:WP:LEAD
1460:WP:GWAR
1455:refuted
1393:Is it:
1286:my edit
1234:GRAPPLE
1182:GRAPPLE
1135:GRAPPLE
1096:GRAPPLE
1060:GRAPPLE
1027:GRAPPLE
994:GRAPPLE
954:GRAPPLE
908:Pending
762:Neutral
581:fiction
355:GRAPPLE
108:Process
1786:msg me
1725:msg me
1683:msg me
1643:msg me
1608:msg me
1570:msg me
848:, and
842:tagged
813:images
785:Stable
583:, and
573:layout
240:Albums
206:Albums
183:scale.
130:Listed
111:Result
77:series
1756:avoid
1431:Toke0
859:Good
821:audio
819:, or
817:video
809:media
768:Fine
744:Fine
722:Fine
685:Fine
663:Fine
633:Fine
605:with
590:Fine
501:Rate
446:from
1801:talk
1765:talk
1701:talk
1661:talk
1633:both
1623:talk
1588:talk
1549:talk
1530:talk
1512:talk
1487:talk
1468:talk
1435:talk
1259:talk
1221:talk
1210:fact
1169:talk
935:and
926:Lede
652:are
484:talk
463:talk
341:talk
298:talk
105:Date
79:, a
1336:RfC
1300:to
741:).
1818::
1803:)
1778:.
1767:)
1703:)
1663:)
1625:)
1590:)
1551:)
1541:No
1532:)
1522:No
1514:)
1506:?
1489:)
1470:)
1437:)
1349:.
1344:}}
1340:{{
1261:)
1223:)
1213:}}
1207:{{
1171:)
989:.
904:.
900:.
882:.
872:6b
856:.
838:6a
823::
815:,
802:6.
783:.
759:.
735:3b
713:3a
698::
693:3.
682:.
676:2c
648:.
646:2b
630:.
624:2a
609::
598:2.
587:.
579:,
575:,
571:,
561:1b
537:1a
522::
517:1.
486:)
471:)
343:)
300:)
54:it
45:.
1799:(
1763:(
1699:(
1659:(
1621:(
1586:(
1547:(
1528:(
1510:(
1485:(
1466:(
1433:(
1419:3
1408:2
1397:1
1381:)
1377:(
1364:.
1357:.
1257:(
1243:X
1219:(
1191:X
1167:(
1144:X
1119:3
1105:X
1083:2
1069:X
1036:X
1003:X
963:X
921:1
898:7
781:5
757:4
482:(
466:·
461:(
364:X
339:(
296:(
237:.
189::
91:.
56:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
