Talk:Jeypore Estate - Knowledge (XXG)

2026:(bolded to make it easier for you) retained various degrees of semi-independence. Also, your new additions are not kosher. Rousseleau clearly says that the Vinayak from Kashmir story is a legend, you're converting it into a fact. Your quote is mostly correct though the addition about Vikramaditya appears to be your own (I don't see it in Rousseleau's text). But, Rousseleau only describes the mound and does not associate it with Vinayak, that's your own addition. The entire quote is unnecessary. Sorry, but no. I again suggest you discuss your edits here on the talk page first. -- 651:(KSB Singh, 1939), which is an effort to reconstruct the medieval era history of the Sankara dynasty's rule by an author who, as the book's introduction notes, is "a scion of a Raj-family which once held independent authority in the Orissa Gadjaths; and he has now become a distinguished member of the present Jeypore, the old Nandapur, Maharaja family by marriage. His second son Sree Ramakrishna Deoas Yuvaraja of Jeypore, will,..., carry forward the Jeypore line into the new Self-governing Federated India." 269: 231: 371: 493: 439: 421: 189: 957:

being untrustworthy because "it's only one book" carries any weight, please think again; we don't judge the content of books by an editor's opinion. When you've found reliable sources that back up what you're proposing, you'll be in a position to suggest changes. Before you start searching, please note that on Knowledge (XXG) the consensus (not just my opinion) is that sources belonging to the

137: 1856:

Dominion of India. The Governor-General's notification of acceptance of same would also suffice. Equally, anyone claiming merger into the Union of India should similarly provide a reference with full date to the merger agreement in 1950 or later. Pending the provision of these references, the entity should be termed an estate (with the word zamindari, talukdari, jagir, etc, in parentheses).

395: 255: 347: 95: 279: 786:

Indo-Aryan lineage. In other words, it’s like tracing your Queen’s lineage with the Han Dynasty of China. The article edited by some Sitush is intentionally degrading the main component of the article viz the Suryavansh dynasty. For eg. Last paragraph under History is insignificant however there was a tiny rebellion and he felt it important to add it in the article.

151: 126: 979:

32: 60: 1612: 2080:

an easy task for the Sultanate of Golconda as the next two kings Balaram Dev I and Yashasvan Dev continued resisting their advancement. There were a few skirmishes and battles between the two kingdoms and eventually Golconda was successful in subduing Jeypore and other hill chiefs of Kalinga." Knowledge (XXG) is not a place for writing your fantasy.

1838:, is that you just type the word "princely" to see the result, you should see a sentence stating " ... Vikram Deo, the Maharajah of Jeypore (an erstwhile princely state in Orissa), the college now proivdes instruction, among others, in chemical technology and pharmacy up to the degree and postgradutae degree levels ....", regards. 540:

should not run for long. Knowledge (XXG) must immediately block these so called admins cum cheap swindlers. I am going to post this in the talk page of every wiki admin. Rules should be the same for everyone, just because some royals throw a few pennies at jobless admins, they ignore their pages and let them use titles.

1855:

It is a simple affair to ascertain whether or not an entity was a princely state. Anyone proposing that Jeypore (or anywhere else in dispute) as being a state should be requested to provide an official GOI reference, with full date in 1947 or 1948, of the signing of the Instrument of Accession to the

1909:

Even more reliable academic sources were removed on 27th September by Lancepark without any Edit Summary or reason of their removal. Even the title of the article was changed from “Kingdom of Jeypore” to “Jeypore Estate”. When there are several sources that claim Jeypore was an estate and later got

1699:

I don’t think legal cases can be considered as primary sources. The task of a legal case is to focus on the legal issue rather than the status of the zamindari/princely state. Most of the sources that you mentioned are primary and reliable sources, like books and government websites, which have also

1411:

is more accurate. The lilavati stuff is unsourced. Schnepel uses "so called" in relation to Jeypore ant the Suryavanshis. You've removed Schepel's statement that Cuttack was independent of Jeypore. I'm sorry, but I can't selectively revert your edits so if you could add them piecemeal, that would be

1007:

etc. It has nothing to do with the square miles/kilometres/feet ruled and everything to do with the relationship between various kingdoms and "their people" in a region. That you do not know this suggests to me that you haven't actually read any of the the Schepnel sources because it is explained to

656:

Thus, even if one discounts their antiquity and obscure publishers, neither of these works are reliable independent sources that one can build an encyclopedic article upon; and, while they are of potential value as primary material to a scholar studying the area's history, they cannot and should not

2079:

stop putting unsourced info like Shankaravamsa. Kalingapride.com is not a source. Nabin Kumar Sahu is a reliable odia historian and the Koraput district Gazetteer by him clearly mentions that Vishwanath Dev Gajapati submitted to Govind Biddyadhar. Even more unsourced info like "This was however not

956:

isn't a reliable source, you will need to find other reliable sources that make that point. Alternatively, if you believe that the information cited to Schnepel is inaccurate, then please quote the reliable sources that you consulted to form that opinion. If you think that your opinion about a book

896:

This article is inaccurate from beginning till end. The Jeypore Samasthanam kings are Kshatriya not Rajputs. The source cited is the only book that says so. Therefore, it can’t be trusted. The paragraph of Bissam-Cuttak is trivial and it would be better if you could remove the protection from this

638:

His Highness the Maharajah, Sri Sri Sri Vikraima Deo, Azem, Mahalrajah, Yujadud Dowla, Mahabat Assar, Yedal Yemeenay, Salatnut, Samsamay, Killapathay, Islam Sri Jhadkhand Badusha, Maharajah of Jeypore, of the Solar Race, the possessor of a hilly tract, in the Vizagapatam District, is naturally mild

568:

This encyclopedia is not the place for hagiographers to puff up the status of titular maharajahs whose titles were abolished by the Indian government years ago. If you're so keen to meet me, please feel free to drop in to the next Manchester meetup (when we're able to have one) and I'll be happy to

530:

Knowledge (XXG) is sold out to frauds. Two users named Rexxs and Regentspark are running this page and I suspect they are looking for bribes. They removed Prince Vishweshvar's 'Maharajah of Jeypore' saying its unconstitutional as the Indian government abolished all titles. However, when it comes to

1053:

Inside community institutions - temple sects, lineage-based 'little kingdoms', mirasi villages - relationships between privilege and responsibility and between the appropriation of surplus and its reinvestment in production can be seen to have been close. The power of the 'little king' was in many

846:

There's a lot you obviously don't get, but I'll do my best to enlighten you. The article is locked from editing by new editors because of a spate of single-purpose accounts persistently adding unsourced, or unreliably sourced, content to the article in an effort to turn it into an hagiography. I'm

1165:

No, that's a link to a page that embeds the pdf directly into the page for anyone having a plugin that handles pdfs. It also provides a download link for the full text for those whose browsers don't render the pdf. The standard way to link from a citation title is to give the reader the full text

998:

The article is locked because there have been too many promotional edits, sockpuppets, people with a conflict of interest etc editing the thing in outright defiance (not mere ignorance) of Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines. You are demonstrating a rather similar attitude, unfortunately. For

770:

I've just removed two paragraphs - one uncited and the other cited to Times of India, acknowledged as unreliable. This whole article is now stuffed with unreliable sources and puffery. I intend to work through and eliminate all of the uncited content and the content sourced to unreliable sources,

1661:

Actually, it was made a zamindari in 1777 when the British defeated them (as mentioned in Gazetteers) but later in 1930s it’s status was promoted and was made into a princely state (as mentioned in modern sources like Accessions List, India & Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences and

1382:

The explanation is in the edit summary. In your edit, you removed the "mythical" attribute and the "claimed belonging" to the suryavansh kingdom. Since that kingdom is mythical, you cannot make definitive statements about it. Also, the cite you provide says nothing about the fabled Ujjain king.

1282:

What’s the reason behind reverting the entire article ? The edits that were made in the article prior to the recent reverting used primary sources such as the “Odisha District Gazetteer” which is a book prepared under the government guidelines and by genuine writers. The other sources were from

539:

mentioning them as kings, maharajahs and prince, they deleted my questions and blocked my username for harrasment. They will delete this as well, but I will continue posting this message with other usernames and IP addresses until this issue is clarified. This online bullying of money swindlers

978:

I would still suggest removing the lock because there are some minor changes that must be made. Also, I am not doubting Schepnel’s work but there are a lot of things that are completely incorrect. For example, the book mentions the royal family as Rajputs but in reality they are Kshatriyas of

785:

1468:

I need an explanation on why Indian Rajputs is not a reliable website ? Which policy of Knowledge (XXG) does it breach ? It is used by numerous pages and no administrator has removed it. Therefore, if you can’t provide a proper explanation then I will have to file a complaint against you for

1972:

You've removed a lot of sourced information with the edit summary "Knowledge (XXG) does not allow the use of colonial era (pre-independence) sources. Read WP policy". Unfortunately, most of the sources removed by you are not pre-independence and the one that is colonial is probably

842:

If you were to read the sources, you would find that "little kingdom" is an aphorism coined by at least one of the authors. Once you've read the source, you'll be able to understand the context, and will be better equipped to comment on the use of that literary

1859:

The government website of Odisha itself recognises Jeypore as a princely state so there is no point of acquiring a Government certificate. If you have a problem contact the royal family via Twitter or Instagram, instead of posting nameless suggestions.

2021:

Unfortunately, your additions are not good. First, you've again removed Gajapati with the same edit summary about 1777. Are you even reading my notes above? The text clearly says that the estate was first a tributary of the Gajapati kingdom and then

1056:

In many ways, judging by some of the screams of protest that emerged in June from people claiming to be tribals from the Jeypore area, the successors to the royal dynasty of Jeypore continue that tradition of careful distribution of largesse. -

1117:

first removed the link from the citation title completely; then removed the link to a full text version and substituted a link to an abstract; then repeated the action. Each time that I've attempted to make the link to the full text version at

1750:

Page 2 mentions its status in 1803 when it recently got annexed by the British - … “ The Jeypore Zamindary Estate was the largest one of the Madras Presidency. In the “Permanent Settlement” of 1803, Jeypore tribute was set at 16,000 rupees.”

1836: 1813: 1261:

as I've already reverted the original edits, I don't feel comfortable applying a sanction, so would you be kind enough when you get a chance to review their contributions and take whatever action you think appropriate, please?

838:

So if there was a rebellion covered in reliable sources, then we should cover it too. If you have sources that describe it as "a tiny rebellion" or insignificant, then let's see them, otherwise the reliably sourced content

982:

In more than three places, he has mentioned it as a “little kingdom” although they covered an area of 26,000km2 also mentioned by him. So I don’t really get why admins are so keen on the editing and locking this article.

789:

639:

and pacific like his father, possesses a quick apprehension and extensive capacity, evinces talents for business, and is no less distinguished for sobriety and decorum of deportment than for literary acquirements...

1957:

You say "Gajapati empire finished in 1560, so how can Jeypore be tributary until 1777". However, the content you removed clearly says "that existed from the mid-15th century to 1777 CE as a tributary state of the

1962:

and following its decline retained various degrees of semi-independence until it became a vassal state of the British". It does not even remotely imply that the estate was a tributary of the Gajapati empire till

1976:

In another edit, you removed sourced content about someone named Mayanka Devi being a claimant. In a subsequent edit, you say "Where does it say that Mayanka Devi is claimant?" (it doesn't, because you removed

920:, someone will make the change for you. Make sure your suggestions are clear (as in "remove xxxx text from the article because of yyyy reason" or "add the following text to xyz section") and include sources. -- 820:

If the reliable source mentions that the royal family are Rajputs, then that is what Knowledge (XXG) reports. To take your example, if our only reliable source stated that Queen Elizabeth was descended from

847:

personally fed up of wasting my time in removing such poor content, and I have no intention of re-opening the floodgates for it to be added again. I hope you understand the position more clearly now. --

1609: 1754:

Apparently, I have read about some zamindaris that had their status promoted to that of ‘princely states’. This seems to be the case here. This zamindari must have got promoted in its later years.

1982:

These are a few examples. Much easier to revert to a clean version and I suggest you get consensus for your edits on this talk page before you try to make changes to the article going forward. --

1634:

Going into depth I feel it seems status of State was reduced to status of Zamindari in between by British, most probably after 1880 but not sure of exact dates. These are some sources I found.

2178: 2163: 569:

explain to you in person why you're mistaken about my reasons for upholding the integrity of Knowledge (XXG). You can do that politely or otherwise – either is fine with me: your choice. --

1288:

If the edits are disallowed and reverted in the same manner then I don’t think it’s the same Knowledge (XXG) that allowed editing, the current admins don’t let others work. Such a shame

1720:

I know legal case cant be considered as primary source, I have cited both type of sources in my opening remarks, however, it is not clear exact status on date of Independence of India.

1283:

Newspaper articles covering the history of the region. But for some reason RegentsPark reverted it back without giving an explanation. Are the rules meant to be different for admins ?

162:. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the 2183: 42: 2143: 2108: 938:

All of the content of Knowledge (XXG) is based on sourcing. Where a relevant claim is made in a reliable source, our article will generally report it. If you assert that

2128: 1137:

That's a link to an interstitial download page. Using the DOI link is more stable and provides the abstract at a glance, which is the standard way to link to papers.

2158: 385: 771:

particularly those dated to the Raj, which have been shown multiple times to be lacking in the basic standards required of having any reputation for accuracy. --

454: 426: 163: 158: 131: 836:"fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic." 2168: 1166:

where it is available, not just the abstract. In my version, the abstract remains available immediately from the doi for those who wish to use the doi.

828:

Please don't ascribe motive to Sitush's edits. It's not your place to comment on another editor, and I hope I don't have to warn you again about that.

1771:

I doubt it is RS as published by Indrajeet Mohanty Reader in History VD Auto College Jeypre, further in he says opposite on very 1st page (page 69)

1173:

the redundant s2cid, then I have no objection as long as you don't remove the link from the citation title to the full text. Similarly, this is in a

337: 2153: 2138: 1798:). It does not seem to be a typo because it has mentioned the neighbouring principalities like 'Parlakhemundi' as an 'estate' or zamindari ( here 1220: 361: 1910:

promoted to a lower tier princely state. It should be changed back to “Kingdom of Jeypore” as it covers the early history when it was a kingdom.

380: 245: 2123: 327: 1810: 1603: 1747:

Page 1 - “ ……This Suryavamsi rule remained for five turbulent centuries till the princely state was annexed to the state of Odisha in 1950.”

1682:

I am not sure some legal cases after independence mention as zamindari, ( cited above ) other older sources mention as State, needs research

1588:

Hi, While I have done edit to mention Jeypore as princely state There seems to be different sources claiming different status for Jeypore as

950: 671: 1894:

As a flat statement that is not correct. I notice your recent edit has removed some more recent academic sources & left far older ones!

2148: 917: 1364:

May I know why has my entire work has been reverted when I have provided a plenty of sources as per the guidelines of Knowledge (XXG) ?

2173: 1969:

The "Under the present town organisation of Nandapur...." appears to be unsourced and it is unclear what the purpose of including it is.

1030:, Cambridge University Press, 1988, ISBN 978-0-521-05372-3 - and he and Schepnel are not the only historians to have used the term. - 1835:

I just checked the second link and for some reason the full sentence is not coming up. Therefore, My advice for the second link viz.

2113: 562: 2133: 1214: 1795:

Yes, it is a matter of debate. However, I found some other government sources and websites that mentioned it as a "state" (here

999:

what it is worth, I have said somewhere recently that we probably could do with an article about the historiographic meaning of

2118: 558: 1624: 1436:

I've removed it. Please provide a reliable source that this was the actual coat of arms if you want to reinstate the image. --

501: 356: 241: 106: 1954:

You've replaced "Jeypore Zamindari" with "popularly known as Jeypore Samasthanam" (unexplained change to sourced information)

1147: 136: 80: 1491:

Indian rajputs is a fan site and the information on it is not verifiable. If you think otherwise, please post a question at

625:. To repeat what I wrote at the recent AFD: the main two sources used are unreliable and need to be removed. In particular: 302: 292: 236: 66: 2103: 213: 940:

Schnepel, Burkhard (2020) , "Kings and Tribes in East India: the Internal Poitical Dimension", in Quigley, Declan (ed.),

657:

be read uncritically or used as sources on wikipedia. Instead a good starting point for rewriting this article would be:

588: 515: 38: 1226: 1879:

Sources dating to the era of the British Raj are unreliable and not suitable to support content in Knowledge (XXG).

603:

Sources dating to the era of the British Raj are unreliable and not suitable to support content in Knowledge (XXG).

817:

It really doesn't matter what you think about Schepnel’s work, because they are a reliable source and you're not.

728: 1744:

However, it does clarify (sort of) that it was a princely state when it merged to the state of Odisha in 1950.

507: 1232: 584: 112: 662: 2004: 1942: 1915: 1884: 1865: 1703:

Even I have seen many sources mentioning it as a princely state. I’ll try to find them and get back to you.

871:

article? Much of the history predates Jeypore and is the history of the larger region. Perhaps move this to

633:(Vadivelu, 1903), which is an outright hagiographical work. Its section on the then king of Jeypore begins: 606:

There are several paragraphs and tables either entirely unsourced or cited using only unreliable sources. --

629: 1181:

to avoid harvard error false positives for editors using Ucucha's script. I hope you can respect that. --

647: 511: 504:

has been authorised by the community for pages related to South Asian social groups, including this page.

2032: 2016: 2000: 1988: 1938: 1931: 1911: 1880: 1861: 1843: 1820: 1759: 1708: 1670: 1627: 1573: 1541: 1509: 1474: 1462: 1442: 1418: 1389: 1358: 1341: 1321: 988: 926: 902: 881: 872: 795: 545: 1501:

Also, please use article talk pages for content related comments so that others can see the discussion.

692:"Durga and the King: Ethnohistorical Aspects of Politico-Ritual Life in a South Orissan Jungle Kingdom" 1809:

I have found some other sources that I previously mentioned. I am sharing it here, please have a look

1311:

the reason I gave was sock puppetry. Sock edits can be reverted without review. (And, you should read

825:, then that's what Knowledge (XXG) would write. Please let me know if that's not clear enough for you. 2085: 2061: 1208: 1203: 2076: 686:. Other writings of Burkhard Schnepel, though older and less detailed, may be easier to access, eg: 94: 31: 1937:

May I know why have you removed my edit? I am providing a legitimate source of Raphael Rousseleau.

760: 1532: 1496: 1155: 2056:

I have rewritten the controversial sections of this article. Does the article still have issues?

1780: 1725: 1687: 1645: 1372: 1293: 1143: 1045: 536: 74: 59: 1899: 1119: 1087: 1077:

I've now restored the link from the citation title to a full text version of this citation in

947: 814:

I've already explained to you how to suggest changes, why are you having difficulty with that?

711: 668: 207: 1312: 1151: 831: 2053: 2027: 1983: 1839: 1816: 1755: 1704: 1666: 1568: 1536: 1504: 1486: 1470: 1437: 1413: 1384: 1336: 1316: 1256: 1099: 1062: 1035: 1013: 984: 921: 898: 876: 809: 791: 743: 703: 541: 492: 1492: 370: 268: 230: 2081: 2057: 1959: 1267: 1186: 1127: 966: 852: 776: 611: 574: 532: 1564: 1528: 1054:

ways transmitted and legitimated through the 'gifts' he bestowed on his favoured subjects

913: 912:

You can suggest changes to the article here on the talk page and, assuming that they are

1589: 1023: 961:

are generally unreliable, and you'll need some modern scholarship to make your case. --

756: 17: 1524: 1088:"The King's Elder Brother: Forest King and "Political Imagination" in Southern Orissa" 729:"The King's Elder Brother: Forest King and "Political Imagination" in Southern Orissa" 2097: 1776: 1721: 1683: 1655: 1641: 1402: 1368: 1306: 1289: 1139: 1114: 70: 1895: 822: 449: 445: 284: 203: 1559:

I've removed the coat of arms that someone added to the article. Please note that

438: 420: 941: 1058: 1031: 1009: 1469:

continuously removing sources from one particular page as per your own wishes.

2049: 1700:

correctly stated the status of Jeypore’s neighbouring zamindaris and states.

1263: 1182: 1123: 962: 848: 772: 622: 607: 570: 274: 188: 1253:

They are also intent on emphasising the non-existent "Maharajah of Jeypore".

714: 1618: 1593: 394: 664:

The Jungle Kings: Ethnohistorical Aspects of Politics and Ritual in Orissa

346: 1495:. Generally, you should use academic sources for historical content (see 1401:

The kingdom was ruled by a dynasty who claimed to belong to the mythical

1630: 2089: 2065: 2037: 2008: 1993: 1946: 1919: 1903: 1888: 1869: 1847: 1824: 1784: 1763: 1729: 1712: 1691: 1674: 1649: 1578: 1546: 1514: 1478: 1447: 1423: 1394: 1376: 1344: 1326: 1297: 1271: 1190: 1160: 1131: 1104: 1066: 1039: 1017: 992: 970: 958: 931: 906: 886: 868: 856: 799: 780: 764: 747: 691: 615: 592: 578: 549: 1048: 1796: 1737:

I found one article, seems like it was published by the government.

1637:

Accordingly, I welcome other editors to do needed changes citing RS.

1367:

Please respond before I file a complaint for unexplained reverting.

707: 300:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 150: 125: 254: 1606: 683: 297: 1999:

I will add source now, it’s Raphael Rousseleau’s book, year 2009

2071:

Stop putting unsourced info or use Kalingapride.com as a source.

487: 88: 54: 26: 1520: 393: 369: 345: 187: 1120:

http://www.fupress.net/index.php/rss/article/view/9116/8896

875:

otherwise much of the pre 1637 content will need to go. --

506:

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the

1966:

Prince of Kashmir. I'm not going to bother with this one.

583:

Where do I sign up to be one of these paid British bots?

1399:

The Kingdom of Jeypore is not the Suryavansh dynasty so

1251:

The second one was after having received a DS/PIA alert.

1567:. "Own work" coat of arms is definitely not sourced. -- 1247: 1244: 1238: 1122:

it has been reverted and a link made to an abstract. --

198: 296:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of 1775:

linking rajas with mythological Vikramadiya, regards

1028:

The Hollow Crown: Ethnohistory of an Indian Kingdom

1563:(emphasis added) on the page must be supported by 696:The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2179:Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors 2164:C-Class Indian history articles of Low-importance 464:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors 172:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Articles for creation 2184:Knowledge (XXG) articles under general sanctions 636: 1022:To add further to the "little kingdom" point, 8: 1599:some claim to be princely state as under :- 1335:Struck through yet another sock's comment. 1243:has twice removed reliably-sourced content 897:article. I’d like to add some facts to it. 467:Template:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors 415: 225: 175:Template:WikiProject Articles for creation 156:This article was reviewed by member(s) of 120: 2144:C-Class Odisha articles of Low-importance 2109:AfC submissions by date/20 September 2019 1103: 2129:C-Class India articles of Low-importance 1405:and hence have been referred to as the 526:Paid British Bots are running this page 417: 227: 122: 92: 2159:Low-importance Indian history articles 1523:, is not reliable either. Please read 1178: 1052: 835: 1875:Adding Unreliable British Raj Sources 1773:.....till abolition of estate in 1953 7: 1519:Unfortunately, the other reference, 290:This article is within the scope of 2169:WikiProject Indian history articles 1453:Why is Indian Rajput not reliable ? 1073:Linking citation title to full text 111:It is of interest to the following 1026:wrote an entire book about them - 402:This article was last assessed in 25: 630:The aristocracy of southern India 312:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject India 202:on 20 September 2019 by reviewer 159:WikiProject Articles for creation 1051:) notes of little kingdoms that 867:Shouldn't this be a part of the 491: 437: 419: 277: 267: 253: 229: 149: 135: 124: 93: 58: 41:on 16 April 2020. The result of 30: 2154:C-Class Indian history articles 332:This article has been rated as 196:This article was accepted from 37:This article was nominated for 2139:Low-importance Odisha articles 1617:while other indicate it was a 1272:14:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC) 579:15:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC) 550:15:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC) 470:Guild of Copy Editors articles 1: 2124:Low-importance India articles 1920:11:19, 15 November 2021 (UTC) 1904:13:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC) 1889:11:39, 14 November 2021 (UTC) 1870:14:44, 3 September 2021 (UTC) 1662:other government websites). 1584:Princely State or Zamindari ? 1345:12:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC) 1327:13:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 1298:13:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 378:This article is supported by 354:This article is supported by 1092:Rivista di studi sudasiatici 1086:Rousseleau, Raphael (2009). 736:Rivista di studi sudasiatici 727:Rousseleau, Raphael (2009). 648:Nandapur: A Forsaken Kingdom 502:contentious topics procedure 381:the Indian history workgroup 2149:WikiProject Odisha articles 690:Schnepel, Burkhard (1995). 661:Schnepel, Burkhard (2002). 2200: 2174:WikiProject India articles 1596:at time of independence. 1521:http://kingdomofjeypore.in 1199:Removal of sourced content 918:WP:Policies and guidelines 508:purpose of Knowledge (XXG) 338:project's importance scale 315:Template:WikiProject India 2090:05:56, 19 July 2024 (UTC) 2038:18:16, 18 June 2022 (UTC) 2009:21:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC) 1994:20:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC) 1947:19:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC) 1848:18:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1825:18:07, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1785:12:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1764:11:46, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1730:10:40, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1713:10:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1692:10:12, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1675:09:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1650:04:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1579:19:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC) 1547:15:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC) 1515:15:17, 12 June 2021 (UTC) 1479:13:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC) 1353:Recent additions reverted 1191:22:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC) 1177:section, so it needs the 1161:21:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC) 1132:21:46, 30 July 2020 (UTC) 1067:02:02, 28 July 2020 (UTC) 1040:01:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC) 1018:01:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC) 993:01:26, 28 July 2020 (UTC) 971:23:25, 26 July 2020 (UTC) 943:The Character of Kingship 932:22:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC) 907:22:09, 26 July 2020 (UTC) 887:21:10, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 857:01:40, 28 July 2020 (UTC) 834:requires us to represent 800:00:35, 28 July 2020 (UTC) 781:02:05, 17 June 2020 (UTC) 593:08:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC) 557:I've never edited either 432: 401: 377: 353: 331: 262: 195: 144: 119: 2114:Accepted AfC submissions 2066:14:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC) 1448:19:57, 31 May 2021 (UTC) 1424:19:50, 31 May 2021 (UTC) 1395:19:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC) 1377:19:25, 31 May 2021 (UTC) 1008:some degree in those. - 765:23:25, 26 May 2020 (UTC) 684:review of the above work 616:21:34, 26 May 2020 (UTC) 516:normal editorial process 2134:C-Class Odisha articles 458:, on 23 September 2021. 18:Talk:Kingdom of Jeypore 2119:C-Class India articles 1812:(pages 9 & 189) , 641: 531:other wiki pages like 512:standards of behaviour 398: 374: 350: 192: 101:This article is rated 2024:following its decline 1932:User talk:RegentsPark 1463:User talk:RegentsPark 1359:User talk:RegentsPark 1277:Unexplained reverting 916:and in line with our 461:Guild of Copy Editors 455:Guild of Copy Editors 427:Guild of Copy Editors 397: 373: 349: 191: 169:Articles for creation 166:for more information. 132:Articles for creation 105:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 67:proposed for deletion 2104:C-Class AfC articles 1815:(page 193), regards. 1407:Jeypore Suryavanshis 1081:for the third time: 1665:I hope that helps. 1113:In separate edits, 83:) on 16 April 2020. 1403:Suryavansh dynasty 1105:10.13128/RISS-9116 873:History of Kalinga 748:10.13128/RISS-9116 563:Muhammed Abdul Ali 537:Muhammed Abdul Ali 518:may be sanctioned. 505: 452:, a member of the 399: 375: 357:WikiProject Odisha 351: 193: 107:content assessment 2036: 1992: 1934: 1577: 1545: 1513: 1502: 1446: 1422: 1393: 1325: 952:978-1-8452-0290-3 930: 885: 673:978-81-7304-467-0 523: 522: 499: 486: 485: 482: 481: 478: 477: 444:This article was 414: 413: 410: 409: 293:WikiProject India 224: 223: 220: 219: 87: 86: 53: 52: 16:(Redirected from 2191: 2030: 2020: 1986: 1929: 1800: 1799: 1571: 1565:reliable sources 1539: 1507: 1500: 1490: 1440: 1416: 1387: 1339: 1319: 1310: 1260: 1242: 1221:deleted contribs 1180: 1159: 1109: 1107: 955: 924: 914:reliably sourced 879: 813: 751: 733: 718: 677: 495: 488: 472: 471: 468: 465: 462: 441: 434: 433: 423: 416: 320: 319: 316: 313: 310: 287: 282: 281: 280: 271: 264: 263: 258: 257: 256: 251: 248: 233: 226: 201: 180: 179: 176: 173: 170: 153: 146: 145: 140: 139: 138: 128: 121: 104: 98: 97: 89: 62: 55: 34: 27: 21: 2199: 2198: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2094: 2093: 2073: 2046: 2014: 1960:Gajapati Empire 1927: 1877: 1586: 1557: 1484: 1455: 1434: 1355: 1337: 1304: 1279: 1254: 1206: 1201: 1175:Further reading 1169:If you wish to 1138: 1085: 1079:Further reading 1075: 1044:Washbrook (see 953: 939: 894: 865: 807: 731: 726: 708:10.2307/3034233 689: 674: 660: 601: 559:Padmanabh Singh 533:Padmanabh Singh 528: 510:, any expected 500:The use of the 469: 466: 463: 460: 459: 317: 314: 311: 308: 307: 283: 278: 276: 252: 249: 239: 197: 177: 174: 171: 168: 167: 134: 102: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2197: 2195: 2187: 2186: 2181: 2176: 2171: 2166: 2161: 2156: 2151: 2146: 2141: 2136: 2131: 2126: 2121: 2116: 2111: 2106: 2096: 2095: 2072: 2069: 2045: 2042: 2041: 2040: 1997: 1996: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1967: 1964: 1955: 1926: 1925:Jeypore Estate 1923: 1907: 1906: 1876: 1873: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1616: 1590:princely state 1585: 1582: 1556: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1454: 1451: 1433: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1354: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1330: 1329: 1278: 1275: 1200: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1167: 1111: 1110: 1074: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1042: 1024:Nicholas Dirks 1020: 1001:little kingdom 976: 975: 974: 973: 951: 936: 893: 890: 864: 861: 860: 859: 844: 840: 829: 826: 818: 815: 805: 768: 767: 754: 753: 752: 721: 720: 719: 702:(1): 145–166. 680: 679: 678: 672: 654: 653: 652: 644: 643: 642: 600: 597: 596: 595: 581: 566: 555: 527: 524: 521: 520: 496: 484: 483: 480: 479: 476: 475: 473: 442: 430: 429: 424: 412: 411: 408: 407: 400: 390: 389: 386:Low-importance 376: 366: 365: 362:Low-importance 352: 342: 341: 334:Low-importance 330: 324: 323: 321: 318:India articles 289: 288: 272: 260: 259: 250:Low‑importance 234: 222: 221: 218: 217: 194: 184: 183: 181: 154: 142: 141: 129: 117: 116: 110: 99: 85: 84: 65:This page was 63: 51: 50: 43:the discussion 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2196: 2185: 2182: 2180: 2177: 2175: 2172: 2170: 2167: 2165: 2162: 2160: 2157: 2155: 2152: 2150: 2147: 2145: 2142: 2140: 2137: 2135: 2132: 2130: 2127: 2125: 2122: 2120: 2117: 2115: 2112: 2110: 2107: 2105: 2102: 2101: 2099: 2092: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2078: 2070: 2068: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2043: 2039: 2034: 2029: 2025: 2018: 2017:MasterClass8x 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2006: 2002: 2001:MasterClass8x 1995: 1990: 1985: 1981: 1975: 1971: 1968: 1965: 1961: 1956: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1939:MasterClass8x 1935: 1933: 1924: 1922: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1912:MasterClass8x 1905: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1881:MasterClass8x 1874: 1872: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1862:MasterClass8x 1857: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1811: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1797: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1752: 1748: 1745: 1742: 1740: 1738: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1701: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1663: 1659: 1657: 1652: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1638: 1635: 1632: 1631: 1628: 1625: 1621: 1620: 1614: 1613: 1610: 1607: 1604: 1600: 1597: 1595: 1591: 1583: 1581: 1580: 1575: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1554: 1548: 1543: 1538: 1535:carefully. -- 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1511: 1506: 1498: 1494: 1488: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1466: 1464: 1460: 1452: 1450: 1449: 1444: 1439: 1431: 1425: 1420: 1415: 1410: 1406: 1404: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1391: 1386: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1365: 1362: 1360: 1352: 1346: 1343: 1340: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1328: 1323: 1318: 1314: 1308: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1285: 1284: 1276: 1274: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1258: 1252: 1248: 1245: 1240: 1237: 1234: 1231: 1228: 1225: 1222: 1219: 1216: 1213: 1210: 1205: 1198: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1116: 1106: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1080: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1055: 1050: 1047: 1043: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1006: 1002: 997: 996: 995: 994: 990: 986: 980: 972: 968: 964: 960: 954: 949: 946:, Routledge, 945: 944: 937: 935: 934: 933: 928: 923: 919: 915: 911: 910: 909: 908: 904: 900: 891: 889: 888: 883: 878: 874: 870: 862: 858: 854: 850: 845: 841: 837: 833: 830: 827: 824: 819: 816: 811: 806: 804: 803: 802: 801: 797: 793: 787: 783: 782: 778: 774: 766: 762: 758: 755: 749: 745: 741: 737: 730: 725: 724: 722: 716: 713: 709: 705: 701: 697: 693: 688: 687: 685: 681: 675: 670: 666: 665: 659: 658: 655: 650: 649: 645: 640: 635: 634: 632: 631: 627: 626: 624: 620: 619: 618: 617: 613: 609: 604: 598: 594: 590: 586: 582: 580: 576: 572: 567: 564: 560: 556: 554: 553: 552: 551: 547: 543: 538: 534: 525: 519: 517: 513: 509: 503: 497: 494: 490: 489: 474: 457: 456: 451: 447: 443: 440: 436: 435: 431: 428: 425: 422: 418: 405: 396: 392: 391: 387: 384:(assessed as 383: 382: 372: 368: 367: 363: 360:(assessed as 359: 358: 348: 344: 343: 339: 335: 329: 326: 325: 322: 305: 304: 299: 295: 294: 286: 275: 273: 270: 266: 265: 261: 247: 243: 238: 235: 232: 228: 215: 212: 209: 205: 200: 190: 186: 185: 182: 165: 161: 160: 155: 152: 148: 147: 143: 133: 130: 127: 123: 118: 114: 108: 100: 96: 91: 90: 82: 79: 76: 72: 68: 64: 61: 57: 56: 48: 44: 40: 36: 33: 29: 28: 19: 2074: 2047: 2023: 1998: 1936: 1928: 1908: 1878: 1858: 1854: 1772: 1753: 1749: 1746: 1743: 1739: 1736: 1702: 1698: 1664: 1660: 1653: 1639: 1636: 1633: 1622: 1615: 1601: 1598: 1587: 1560: 1558: 1555:Coat of Arms 1467: 1458: 1456: 1435: 1432:Coat of Arms 1412:helpful. -- 1408: 1400: 1366: 1363: 1357:(Moved from 1356: 1287: 1286: 1281: 1280: 1250: 1235: 1229: 1223: 1217: 1211: 1202: 1174: 1170: 1112: 1095: 1091: 1078: 1076: 1027: 1004: 1000: 981: 977: 942: 895: 866: 823:Genghis Khan 788: 784: 769: 739: 735: 699: 695: 663: 646: 637: 628: 605: 602: 529: 498: 453: 403: 379: 355: 333: 303:project page 301: 291: 285:India portal 210: 178:AfC articles 164:project page 157: 113:WikiProjects 77: 46: 2054:RegentsPark 2028:RegentsPark 1984:RegentsPark 1930:Moved from 1840:Odiahistory 1817:Odiahistory 1756:Odiahistory 1705:Odiahistory 1667:Odiahistory 1569:RegentsPark 1537:RegentsPark 1505:RegentsPark 1487:RudolphHitz 1471:RudolphHitz 1461:moved from 1438:RegentsPark 1414:RegentsPark 1385:RegentsPark 1338:Doug Weller 1317:RegentsPark 1257:RegentsPark 1005:little king 985:Hattershush 922:RegentsPark 899:Hattershush 877:regentspark 810:Hattershush 792:Hattershush 667:. Manohar. 621:Agree with 542:Hattershush 446:copy edited 2098:Categories 2082:Witchilich 2058:Witchilich 1561:everything 1233:block user 1227:page moves 1204:Indopaedia 892:Inaccurate 723:See also: 585:Dāsānudāsa 199:this draft 2077:DubuliRao 1619:zamindari 1594:zamindari 1533:WP:HISTRS 1497:WP:HISTRS 1239:block log 1179:|ref=none 1098:: 39–62. 757:Abecedare 742:: 39–62. 715:1359-0987 514:, or any 1777:Jethwarp 1722:Jethwarp 1684:Jethwarp 1656:Jethwarp 1642:Jethwarp 1369:Rodotype 1315:asap) -- 1307:Dersvey8 1290:Dersvey8 1215:contribs 1140:Headbomb 1115:Headbomb 565:], liar. 404:May 2023 214:contribs 81:contribs 71:Bishonen 39:deletion 2044:Rewrite 2033:comment 1989:comment 1973:kosher. 1896:Johnbod 1640:Thanks 1574:comment 1542:comment 1510:comment 1443:comment 1419:comment 1390:comment 1322:comment 1313:WP:SOCK 959:Raj era 927:comment 882:comment 869:Kalinga 863:Kalinga 843:device. 832:WP:NPOV 599:Sources 450:Dhtwiki 336:on the 246:History 204:Bkissin 103:C-class 1654:Hello 1531:, and 1493:WP:RSN 1059:Sitush 1049:312492 1032:Sitush 1010:Sitush 839:stays. 242:Odisha 109:scale. 2050:RexxS 1963:1777. 1529:WP:RS 1459:Note: 1264:RexxS 1183:RexxS 1124:RexxS 1046:JSTOR 963:RexxS 849:RexxS 773:RexxS 732:(PDF) 623:RexxS 608:RexxS 571:RexxS 309:India 298:India 237:India 2086:talk 2062:talk 2005:talk 1977:it). 1943:talk 1916:talk 1900:talk 1885:talk 1866:talk 1844:talk 1821:talk 1781:talk 1760:talk 1726:talk 1709:talk 1688:talk 1671:talk 1646:talk 1525:WP:V 1475:talk 1373:talk 1342:talk 1294:talk 1268:talk 1209:talk 1187:talk 1128:talk 1063:talk 1036:talk 1014:talk 989:talk 967:talk 948:ISBN 903:talk 853:talk 796:talk 777:talk 761:talk 712:ISSN 682:See 669:ISBN 612:talk 589:talk 575:talk 546:talk 535:and 208:talk 75:talk 47:keep 45:was 1658:, 1629:3. 1626:2 1623:1. 1611:4 1608:3 1605:2. 1602:1. 1592:or 1499:). 1171:add 1100:doi 744:doi 704:doi 561:or 448:by 328:Low 69:by 2100:: 2088:) 2064:) 2007:) 1945:) 1918:) 1902:) 1887:) 1868:) 1846:) 1823:) 1783:) 1762:) 1741:] 1728:) 1711:) 1690:) 1673:) 1648:) 1527:, 1503:-- 1477:) 1465:) 1383:-- 1375:) 1361:) 1296:) 1270:) 1262:-- 1249:. 1246:, 1189:) 1154:· 1150:· 1146:· 1130:) 1094:. 1090:. 1065:) 1038:) 1016:) 1003:, 991:) 969:) 905:) 855:) 798:) 779:) 763:) 738:. 734:. 710:. 698:. 694:. 614:) 591:) 577:) 548:) 388:). 364:). 244:/ 240:: 216:). 2084:( 2075:@ 2060:( 2052:@ 2048:@ 2035:) 2031:( 2019:: 2015:@ 2003:( 1991:) 1987:( 1941:( 1914:( 1898:( 1883:( 1864:( 1842:( 1819:( 1779:( 1758:( 1724:( 1707:( 1686:( 1669:( 1644:( 1576:) 1572:( 1544:) 1540:( 1512:) 1508:( 1489:: 1485:@ 1473:( 1457:( 1445:) 1441:( 1421:) 1417:( 1409:. 1392:) 1388:( 1371:( 1324:) 1320:( 1309:: 1305:@ 1292:( 1266:( 1259:: 1255:@ 1241:) 1236:· 1230:· 1224:· 1218:· 1212:· 1207:( 1185:( 1158:} 1156:b 1152:p 1148:c 1144:t 1142:{ 1126:( 1108:. 1102:: 1096:4 1061:( 1034:( 1012:( 987:( 965:( 929:) 925:( 901:( 884:) 880:( 851:( 812:: 808:@ 794:( 775:( 759:( 750:. 746:: 740:4 717:. 706:: 700:1 676:. 610:( 587:( 573:( 544:( 406:. 340:. 306:. 211:· 206:( 115:: 78:· 73:( 49:. 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index