630:
612:
545:
513:
1352:, page 381: "On the eve of the Pacific War the Japanese Navy transferred twenty-seven G4M1s of the Kanoya Kokutai to bases in Indo-China to strengthen its air striking force poised to attack the battleships of Admiral Sir Tom Phillips, while retaining on Formosan bases ninety-three other Navy Type 1 Attack Bombers for operations against the American forces in the Philippines. Within a week of the initial Japanese attack these aircraft had effectively contributed to the sinking of HMS
1477:) 04:15, 24 February 2017 (UTC) it would also be interesting to know why a battlecruiser was much more easy to build than a battleship. 2000 ton less (27000 vs 29000) do not seem a real advantage. Perhaps turbines were easier than armor? I have read (I may search where if needed) that Fisher wanted these ships to repeat the Falkland battle, without considering that the oceans had no more german cruisers in them (the author of this statement had a VERY bad opinion of Fisher).
979:
958:
529:
233:
874:
676:
853:
190:
497:
884:
989:
360:
561:
711:
693:
577:
435:
391:
1187:
which could overwhelm a battlecruiser's thinner armour, as happened at
Jutland. Similarly the design proved as susceptible as any capital ship to aircraft. What got Repulse in the end was torpedoes launched from aircraft, not shells from a Japanese ship. Maybe the problem would fit better with a ship like
1186:
That story doesn't ring true in many ways, maybe the author of your physics problems has deliberately twisted the facts to suit their purpose. The battlecruiser design was acknowledged to be eminently sinkable in certain situations, they were not meant to be used against battleships for instance,
1159:
I'd heard, in physics problems, that the repulse was fabeled to be unsinkable and was hit in the funnel by a shot from a jap ship ~11km away. Naturally I doubted the facts but thought, after looking here to confirm my skeptisism, that I should leave this here incase someone wants to include it or
1409:
A second problem was that carrier doctrine for almost all nations in 1941-42 was to have lots of strike aircraft and few fighters. Later in the war, the US learned from experience to have a higher proportion of fighters, and I think the
British learned this lesson from the Americans. The
1318:
None of my numerous references mention any G4M Betty bombers taking part in this attack. All of them refer to only G3M Nells being in the squadrons operating out of Indo-China back then. This should be corrected in the article. I don't have my sources to cite, but they are many.
1113:
300 died). I have no idea what the correct figures are and since there are no in-line citations it's impossible to work out where the data has come from. Does anyone have verifiable information on the complement of each ship and the number that perished in
December 41?
1403:
The problem was that the Royal Navy had made some remarkably poor choices about carrier-borne fighters. Skua was a great divebomber; it was not obsolete; it just wasn't suitable as a fighter. Fulmar was another odd choice of aircraft for the fighter
1347:
According to my notes, Mihoro and Genzan Air Groups were equipped only with G3Ms, and the majority of G4Ms were in Taiwan for the attack on the
Philippines. However, part of Kanoya Air Group was based in Saigon and equipped with G4Ms. From Francillon,
1584:
To me at least, "consort" in this context is one who aids and accompanies but is complementary rather than subservient. Since this conveys the relationship between the two ships here I think it conveys the intended message and works in the article.
1629:
315:
1624:
536:
409:
520:
405:
629:
611:
330:
590:
1074:
Repulse
Statistics: 36,000 tons, 32-knot speed, six 15-inch guns, crew of 69 officers and 1,240 ratings well trained with consistently high marks the ship received on exercise, last Captain is Captain W.G. (Bill) Tennant.
504:
401:
153:
1446:
You're forgetting that the
Japanese bombers were unescorted and fighter cover likely would have saved Force Z that day, but the long-term prospects were dim for Force Z when the Fulmars and Sea Hurricanes met
585:
421:
568:
417:
940:
552:
413:
1279:
Hmm. Yes. Good point. :-) - would be a good idea to include the update armour configuration in the 1939 section of the infobx though, an perhaps to remove the "1930s" subhead from the interwar section.
1649:
254:
243:
1689:
1679:
1112:
and the sinking of both ships do not agree with one-another (Eg. According the article on
Repulse more survivors were rescued from the ship than were in its complement, and : -->
1684:
1654:
447:
1674:
1639:
147:
1634:
1566:
1469:
In the table at completion time, 5x3 is misprinted in 6x3 In 1940, a further triple mount was deleted (as shown in the photo of the last convoy to singapore). pietro
1729:
751:
757:
1669:
79:
1049:
1664:
1659:
646:
1739:
1644:
1619:
930:
44:
1754:
1709:
1039:
442:
396:
1699:
727:
544:
85:
1744:
1704:
906:
1759:
1694:
1015:
219:
451:
1734:
1724:
1719:
1484:
1470:
1216:
1085:
30:
1749:
1609:
1546:
Actually curious about this as well. Did a search for "consort" but the word doesn't seem to appear in the article. Can you clarify? -
718:
698:
650:
1335:
1144:
1078:
Military
Heritage did a feature on the Repulse and its sinking (Joseph M. Horodyski, Military Heritage, Volume 3, No. 3, pp.69 to 77)
1380:
Had there been an aircraft carrier accompanying the
Repulse and Prince of Wales, would it have made any difference to the sinkings?
897:
858:
207:
201:
99:
1002:
963:
104:
20:
1714:
1383:
At this stage of the war
British aircraft design was so obsolete that the aircraft carrier would probably have been sunk as well.
74:
168:
371:
1614:
654:
135:
637:
617:
65:
726:-related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
249:
1175:
300:
1192:
129:
109:
1488:
1474:
1220:
1089:
512:
377:
260:
232:
125:
1452:
1299:
1270:
446:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
1480:
1419:
A third problem was that Phillips believed in the ability of warships to defend themselves from air attack.
1323:
1163:
1132:
1081:
1331:
1140:
55:
1014:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
905:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
805:
189:
175:
1327:
70:
1384:
264:
211:
1388:
161:
1537:
1508:
1448:
1295:
1285:
1266:
1255:
1250:
There is a serious omission - no mention of Repulse's armour scheme after the 1934-6 conversion.
1123:
436 men died on Hms Repulse according to the surviours website. See the website for mor details
24:
1398:
Yes all those obsolete Hurricanes and Spitfires were why the British lost the Battle of Britain.
1167:
1590:
1547:
1523:
1136:
1127:
1011:
259:, a featured topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the
141:
51:
1574:
1437:
889:
978:
957:
1432:. The most likely result would have been the loss of a third capital ship and her crew.--
1365:
1235:
1215:
WWII: When did Repulse leave India for the Far East and when did she arrive in Singapore?
1200:
1171:
994:
528:
1603:
1562:
1533:
1504:
1281:
1251:
1188:
645:-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
1586:
1519:
1115:
675:
1424:
I think a British carrier of the time would have been unlikely to have saved the
1570:
1433:
873:
852:
560:
1361:
1231:
1196:
984:
879:
710:
692:
1630:
Knowledge (XXG) featured topics Battlecruisers of the Royal Navy good content
1594:
1578:
1552:
1541:
1527:
1512:
1492:
1456:
1441:
1392:
1369:
1339:
1303:
1289:
1274:
1259:
1239:
1224:
1204:
1179:
1148:
1118:
1093:
902:
723:
496:
653:. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
1191:, a battlecruiser sunk by a lucky strike from a long range shot from the
1007:
1625:
Knowledge (XXG) featured topics Battlecruisers of the world good content
901:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
576:
1124:
1265:
Why should there be? Nothing changed since the 1919 reconstruction.--
434:
390:
1518:
Would you help by telling us where this is in the article please?
1230:
29 November (from Colombo that is) and 2 December respectively.
642:
353:
15:
575:
559:
543:
527:
511:
495:
1360:
and to eliminating American air power in the Philippines."
792:
787:
782:
777:
293:
160:
1650:
GA-Class Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I) articles
1006:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
722:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1567:
Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Jeneral28
478:
174:
756:This article has not yet received a rating on the
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
217:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
1690:European military history task force articles
1499:Explain use of the word "consort" in the lead
8:
1680:British military history task force articles
1104:The casualty figures in the articles on the
460:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
1685:GA-Class European military history articles
1655:Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I) articles
1675:GA-Class British military history articles
1640:GA-Class Operation Majestic Titan articles
1478:
1079:
952:
847:
765:
687:
606:
475:
385:
272:
184:
1635:High-importance Featured topics articles
1071:The given Repulse statistics given are:
440:This article is within the scope of the
1503:Why the term 'consort' is appropriate?
954:
849:
689:
608:
387:
813:Currently working on it-----Completed!
769:Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:
736:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Shipwrecks
450:. To use this banner, please see the
1730:Unknown-importance Shipwreck articles
915:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Singapore
463:Template:WikiProject Military history
263:. If you can update or improve them,
7:
1670:Maritime warfare task force articles
1350:Japanese Aircraft of the Pacific War
1294:Yes, I've been meaning to do that.--
1125:http://www.forcez-survivors.org.uk//
1024:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Malaysia
1000:This article is within the scope of
895:This article is within the scope of
716:This article is within the scope of
635:This article is within the scope of
537:European military history task force
359:
357:
1414:would not have had enough fighters.
521:British military history task force
376:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1665:GA-Class maritime warfare articles
1660:GA-Class military history articles
14:
1740:Mid-importance Singapore articles
1645:Operation Majestic Titan articles
1620:GA-Class Featured topics articles
663:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Ships
210:. If you can improve it further,
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1755:Mid-importance Malaysia articles
1710:World War II task force articles
987:
977:
956:
882:
872:
851:
709:
691:
674:
628:
610:
433:
389:
358:
255:Battlecruisers of the Royal Navy
231:
188:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1700:World War I task force articles
1565:has been blocked as a sock per
1044:This article has been rated as
935:This article has been rated as
739:Template:WikiProject Shipwrecks
1745:WikiProject Singapore articles
1705:GA-Class World War II articles
918:Template:WikiProject Singapore
198:has been listed as one of the
1:
1760:WikiProject Malaysia articles
1695:GA-Class World War I articles
1610:Knowledge (XXG) good articles
1370:18:21, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
1340:14:22, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
1304:15:35, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
1290:15:20, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
1275:14:58, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
1260:11:10, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
1240:15:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
1225:11:35, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
1205:15:53, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
1149:20:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
1027:Template:WikiProject Malaysia
1018:and see a list of open tasks.
909:and see a list of open tasks.
824:Still adding more information
730:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1094:21:56, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
443:Military history WikiProject
1735:GA-Class Singapore articles
1725:GA-Class Shipwreck articles
1720:All WikiProject Ships pages
1119:13:13, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
822:Add any additions if needed
641:, a project to improve all
505:Maritime warfare task force
244:Battlecruisers of the world
1776:
1750:GA-Class Malaysia articles
1553:06:09, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
1542:12:30, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
1528:17:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
1513:04:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
1493:10:37, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
1457:19:50, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
1442:17:28, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
1393:12:51, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
1193:German battleship Bismarck
1050:project's importance scale
758:project's importance scale
666:Template:WikiProject Ships
1043:
972:
934:
867:
828:Discuss desired additions
764:
755:
704:
623:
583:
567:
551:
535:
519:
503:
474:
466:military history articles
428:
384:
344:
275:
271:
261:Knowledge (XXG) community
252:. It is also part of the
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1180:10:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
586:Operation Majestic Titan
422:Operation Majestic Titan
331:Featured topic candidate
1715:GA-Class Ships articles
1595:17:57, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
1579:22:37, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
1012:Malaysia-related topics
649:, or contribute to the
569:World War II task force
479:Associated task forces:
719:WikiProject Shipwrecks
580:
564:
553:World War I task force
548:
532:
516:
500:
366:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1615:Warfare good articles
1314:Japanese attack force
898:WikiProject Singapore
806:Lady Elizabeth (1879)
579:
563:
547:
531:
515:
499:
370:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
208:good article criteria
202:Warfare good articles
100:Neutral point of view
1376:the aircraft carrier
1246:Armour after rebuild
1003:WikiProject Malaysia
316:Good topic candidate
301:Good article nominee
105:No original research
1532:Very obvious. Why?
921:Singapore articles
742:Shipwreck articles
651:project discussion
581:
565:
549:
533:
517:
501:
448:list of open tasks
372:content assessment
276:Article milestones
239:HMS Repulse (1916)
196:HMS Repulse (1916)
86:dispute resolution
47:
25:HMS Repulse (1916)
1495:
1483:comment added by
1343:
1326:comment added by
1182:
1166:comment added by
1151:
1135:comment added by
1096:
1084:comment added by
1067:Different tonnage
1064:
1063:
1060:
1059:
1056:
1055:
1030:Malaysia articles
951:
950:
947:
946:
846:
845:
842:
841:
838:
837:
686:
685:
682:
681:
655:full instructions
638:WikiProject Ships
605:
604:
601:
600:
597:
596:
452:full instructions
352:
351:
340:
339:
311:December 17, 2010
226:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1767:
1550:
1342:
1320:
1161:
1130:
1100:Casualty figures
1032:
1031:
1028:
1025:
1022:
997:
992:
991:
990:
981:
974:
973:
968:
960:
953:
941:importance scale
923:
922:
919:
916:
913:
892:
890:Singapore portal
887:
886:
885:
876:
869:
868:
863:
855:
848:
766:
744:
743:
740:
737:
734:
713:
706:
705:
695:
688:
678:
671:
670:
667:
664:
661:
647:join the project
632:
625:
624:
614:
607:
486:
476:
468:
467:
464:
461:
458:
457:Military history
437:
430:
429:
424:
397:Military history
393:
386:
369:
363:
362:
361:
354:
345:Current status:
326:October 31, 2013
296:
273:
235:
215:
192:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1775:
1774:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1600:
1599:
1548:
1501:
1467:
1426:Prince of Wales
1378:
1354:Prince of Wales
1321:
1316:
1248:
1213:
1157:
1106:Prince of Wales
1102:
1069:
1029:
1026:
1023:
1020:
1019:
995:Malaysia portal
993:
988:
986:
966:
920:
917:
914:
911:
910:
888:
883:
881:
861:
817:Improve grammar
797:
741:
738:
735:
732:
731:
668:
665:
662:
659:
658:
484:
465:
462:
459:
456:
455:
399:
367:
294:October 4, 2010
292:
241:is part of the
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1773:
1771:
1763:
1762:
1757:
1752:
1747:
1742:
1737:
1732:
1727:
1722:
1717:
1712:
1707:
1702:
1697:
1692:
1687:
1682:
1677:
1672:
1667:
1662:
1657:
1652:
1647:
1642:
1637:
1632:
1627:
1622:
1617:
1612:
1602:
1601:
1598:
1597:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1500:
1497:
1485:151.29.247.249
1471:151.29.249.152
1466:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1421:
1420:
1416:
1415:
1406:
1405:
1400:
1399:
1377:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1315:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1247:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1217:81.156.125.126
1212:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1156:
1153:
1101:
1098:
1086:172.193.84.111
1068:
1065:
1062:
1061:
1058:
1057:
1054:
1053:
1046:Mid-importance
1042:
1036:
1035:
1033:
1016:the discussion
999:
998:
982:
970:
969:
967:Mid‑importance
961:
949:
948:
945:
944:
937:Mid-importance
933:
927:
926:
924:
907:the discussion
894:
893:
877:
865:
864:
862:Mid‑importance
856:
844:
843:
840:
839:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
825:
819:
814:
811:Clean up typos
796:
795:
790:
785:
780:
774:
771:
770:
762:
761:
754:
748:
747:
745:
728:the discussion
714:
702:
701:
696:
684:
683:
680:
679:
672:
669:Ships articles
633:
621:
620:
615:
603:
602:
599:
598:
595:
594:
582:
572:
571:
566:
556:
555:
550:
540:
539:
534:
524:
523:
518:
508:
507:
502:
492:
491:
489:
487:
481:
480:
472:
471:
469:
438:
426:
425:
394:
382:
381:
375:
364:
350:
349:
342:
341:
338:
337:
334:
327:
323:
322:
319:
312:
308:
307:
304:
297:
289:
288:
285:
282:
278:
277:
269:
268:
250:featured topic
236:
228:
227:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1772:
1761:
1758:
1756:
1753:
1751:
1748:
1746:
1743:
1741:
1738:
1736:
1733:
1731:
1728:
1726:
1723:
1721:
1718:
1716:
1713:
1711:
1708:
1706:
1703:
1701:
1698:
1696:
1693:
1691:
1688:
1686:
1683:
1681:
1678:
1676:
1673:
1671:
1668:
1666:
1663:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1638:
1636:
1633:
1631:
1628:
1626:
1623:
1621:
1618:
1616:
1613:
1611:
1608:
1607:
1605:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1563:User:BlueD954
1554:
1551:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1498:
1496:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1476:
1472:
1464:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1449:Sturmvogel 66
1445:
1444:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1422:
1418:
1417:
1413:
1408:
1407:
1402:
1401:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1381:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1313:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1296:Sturmvogel 66
1293:
1292:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1267:Sturmvogel 66
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1189:HMS Hood (51)
1185:
1184:
1183:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1154:
1152:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1129:
1126:
1121:
1120:
1117:
1111:
1107:
1099:
1097:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1076:
1072:
1066:
1051:
1047:
1041:
1038:
1037:
1034:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1004:
996:
985:
983:
980:
976:
975:
971:
965:
962:
959:
955:
942:
938:
932:
929:
928:
925:
908:
904:
900:
899:
891:
880:
878:
875:
871:
870:
866:
860:
857:
854:
850:
829:
826:
823:
820:
818:
815:
812:
809:
808:
807:
804:
803:
802:
801:
794:
791:
789:
786:
784:
781:
779:
776:
775:
773:
772:
768:
767:
763:
759:
753:
750:
749:
746:
729:
725:
721:
720:
715:
712:
708:
707:
703:
700:
697:
694:
690:
677:
673:
656:
652:
648:
644:
640:
639:
634:
631:
627:
626:
622:
619:
616:
613:
609:
592:
588:
587:
578:
574:
573:
570:
562:
558:
557:
554:
546:
542:
541:
538:
530:
526:
525:
522:
514:
510:
509:
506:
498:
494:
493:
490:
488:
483:
482:
477:
473:
470:
453:
449:
445:
444:
439:
436:
432:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
398:
395:
392:
388:
383:
379:
373:
365:
356:
355:
348:
343:
335:
333:
332:
328:
325:
324:
320:
318:
317:
313:
310:
309:
305:
303:
302:
298:
295:
291:
290:
286:
283:
280:
279:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
256:
251:
247:
245:
240:
237:
234:
230:
229:
224:
222:
221:
213:
209:
205:
204:
203:
197:
194:
191:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1561:
1502:
1479:— Preceding
1468:
1429:
1425:
1411:
1382:
1379:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1328:Cadillacmike
1322:— Preceding
1317:
1249:
1214:
1158:
1137:Celticosprey
1128:Celticosprey
1122:
1109:
1105:
1103:
1080:— Preceding
1077:
1073:
1070:
1045:
1001:
936:
896:
827:
821:
816:
810:
799:
798:
717:
636:
584:
441:
418:World War II
378:WikiProjects
347:Good article
346:
329:
314:
299:
265:please do so
253:
242:
238:
218:
216:
212:please do so
200:
199:
195:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1412:Indomitable
1162:—Preceding
1160:whatever.
1131:—Preceding
414:World War I
148:free images
31:not a forum
1604:Categories
733:Shipwrecks
699:Shipwrecks
206:under the
1385:AT Kunene
912:Singapore
903:Singapore
859:Singapore
724:shipwreck
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1534:BlueD954
1505:BlueD954
1481:unsigned
1447:Zeros.--
1356:and HMS
1336:contribs
1324:unsigned
1282:The Land
1252:The Land
1176:contribs
1164:unsigned
1145:contribs
1133:unsigned
1082:unsigned
1021:Malaysia
1008:Malaysia
964:Malaysia
410:European
402:Maritime
368:GA-class
336:Promoted
321:Promoted
220:reassess
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1587:Britmax
1520:Britmax
1465:4" guns
1430:Repulse
1358:Repulse
1116:Wiki-Ed
1110:Repulse
1048:on the
939:on the
783:history
591:Phase I
406:British
284:Process
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
1571:BilCat
1434:Toddy1
374:scale.
306:Listed
287:Result
257:series
246:series
126:Google
1404:role.
1362:Yaush
1232:Benea
1211:Dates
1197:Benea
1168:Fists
1155:myths
830:-None
800:To Do
793:purge
788:watch
660:Ships
618:Ships
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1591:talk
1575:talk
1549:wolf
1538:talk
1524:talk
1509:talk
1489:talk
1475:talk
1453:talk
1438:talk
1428:and
1389:talk
1366:talk
1332:talk
1300:talk
1286:talk
1271:talk
1256:talk
1236:talk
1221:talk
1201:talk
1172:talk
1141:talk
1090:talk
1010:and
778:edit
643:Ship
281:Date
248:, a
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1040:Mid
931:Mid
752:???
176:TWL
1606::
1593:)
1577:)
1569:.
1540:)
1526:)
1511:)
1491:)
1455:)
1440:)
1391:)
1368:)
1338:)
1334:•
1302:)
1288:)
1273:)
1258:)
1238:)
1223:)
1203:)
1195:.
1178:)
1174:•
1147:)
1143:•
1108:,
1092:)
485:/
420:/
416:/
412:/
408:/
404:/
400::
223:it
214:.
156:)
54:;
1589:(
1573:(
1536:(
1522:(
1507:(
1487:(
1473:(
1451:(
1436:(
1387:(
1364:(
1330:(
1298:(
1284:(
1269:(
1254:(
1234:(
1219:(
1199:(
1170:(
1139:(
1088:(
1052:.
943:.
760:.
657:.
593:)
589:(
454:.
380::
267:.
225:.
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
