Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:H-class battleship proposals/GA1

Source ๐Ÿ“

456: 436: 420: 392: 367: 344: 332: 311: 295: 283: 252: 216: 49: 482:
Thanks for reviewing the article. I'll probably hold off on making the suggested improvements (all of which are excellent, btw) until I'm ready to take the article to ACR/FAC, but I didn't want you to think I missed the review page. Thanks again.
178:"The ship's radius of action was to be at least equal that of the Deutschland-class cruisers" - it would be best to specify what that was in this article to save people from having to follow the link 54: 133: 129: 87: 114: 59: 77: 106: 246: 194: 414: 82: 122: 17: 305: 99: 226: 269: 386: 184:
It would be interesting to discuss the ships' planned aviation capabilities, as these seem unusually large
171:
This article easily meets the GA criteria - great work. My suggestions for further improvements are:
23: 488: 406: 277: 234: 198: 181:
Assessments by historians on the merits of the various designs would probably be worth including
492: 476: 161: 357: 230: 472: 157: 430: 242: 238: 484: 468: 153: 429:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
413:
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
141: 110: 175:The lead should (briefly) identify what Plan Z was 292:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 8: 37: 68: 40: 24:Talk:H class battleship proposals/GA1 7: 364:Fair representation without bias: 189:Assessment against the GA criteria 31: 18:Talk:H-class battleship proposals 454: 434: 418: 390: 365: 342: 330: 309: 293: 281: 250: 214: 1: 455: 435: 419: 391: 366: 343: 331: 310: 294: 282: 251: 215: 509: 493:03:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC) 477:10:08, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 162:10:08, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 410:to illustrate the topic? 208:reasonably well written 324:broad in its coverage 278:References to sources 306:No original research 415:fair use rationales 329:A. Major aspects: 265:factually accurate 213:A. Prose quality: 431:suitable captions 96: 95: 22:(Redirected from 500: 458: 457: 438: 437: 422: 421: 394: 393: 369: 368: 346: 345: 334: 333: 313: 312: 297: 296: 285: 284: 254: 253: 218: 217: 146: 137: 118: 50:Copyvio detector 38: 27: 508: 507: 503: 502: 501: 499: 498: 497: 229:compliance for 191: 169: 127: 104: 98: 92: 64: 36: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 506: 504: 496: 495: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 453:Pass or Fail: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 427: 426: 425: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 353: 352: 351: 350: 349: 339: 338: 337: 320: 319: 318: 317: 316: 302: 301: 300: 290: 289: 288: 261: 260: 259: 258: 257: 239:words to watch 223: 222: 221: 190: 187: 186: 185: 182: 179: 176: 168: 165: 147: 94: 93: 91: 90: 85: 80: 74: 71: 70: 66: 65: 63: 62: 60:External links 57: 52: 46: 43: 42: 35: 32: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 505: 494: 490: 486: 481: 480: 479: 478: 474: 470: 460: 459: 452: 451: 449: 446: 440: 439: 432: 428: 424: 423: 416: 412: 411: 409: 408: 402: 396: 395: 388: 384: 383: 381: 377: 371: 370: 363: 362: 360: 359: 354: 348: 347: 340: 336: 335: 328: 327: 325: 321: 315: 314: 307: 303: 299: 298: 291: 287: 286: 279: 275: 274: 272: 271: 266: 262: 256: 255: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 228: 224: 220: 219: 212: 211: 209: 205: 204: 203: 202: 200: 197:review โ€“ see 196: 188: 183: 180: 177: 174: 173: 172: 166: 164: 163: 159: 155: 152: 148: 145: 144: 140: 135: 131: 126: 125: 121: 116: 112: 108: 103: 102: 89: 86: 84: 81: 79: 76: 75: 73: 72: 67: 61: 58: 56: 53: 51: 48: 47: 45: 44: 39: 33: 25: 19: 467: 447: 404: 379: 356: 341:B. Focused: 323: 268: 264: 207: 201:for criteria 193: 192: 170: 150: 149: 142: 138: 124:Article talk 123: 119: 100: 97: 88:Instructions 111:visual edit 270:verifiable 55:Authorship 41:GA toolbox 485:Parsecboy 387:edit wars 151:Reviewer: 78:Templates 69:Reviewing 34:GA Review 405:contain 403:Does it 199:WP:WIAGA 167:Comments 83:Criteria 448:Overall 389:, etc: 358:neutral 243:fiction 134:history 115:history 101:Article 469:Nick-D 407:images 380:stable 378:Is it 355:Is it 322:Is it 263:Is it 245:, and 235:layout 206:Is it 154:Nick-D 247:lists 143:Watch 16:< 489:talk 473:talk 267:and 231:lead 158:talk 130:edit 107:edit 385:No 304:C. 276:A. 227:MoS 225:B. 491:) 475:) 450:: 433:: 417:: 382:? 361:? 326:? 308:: 280:: 273:? 249:: 241:, 237:, 233:, 210:? 195:GA 160:) 132:| 113:| 109:| 487:( 471:( 156:( 139:ยท 136:) 128:( 120:ยท 117:) 105:( 26:)

Index

Talk:H-class battleship proposals
Talk:H class battleship proposals/GA1
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Nick-D
talk
10:08, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
GA
WP:WIAGA
MoS
lead
layout
words to watch
fiction
lists
verifiable
References to sources
No original research

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘