880:
1673:
crowds, the traffic related to businesses, the light related to the time of the day and weather, and other factors and obstructions. One of the Frank
Sinatra stars is located at the entrance to a very busy grocery store, so that star is always badly contaminated. I manually cleaned that star thoroughly before taking photos, while at the same time I was sustaining multiple interferences from strangers. Again, stars on the Blvd are never clean enough due to dust, dirt, weather, thousands of tourists stepping on stars daily, often dropping food and drinks, damaging, vandalizing, obstructing and causing other problems resulting in wear and tear. However, when these and other stars will be restored to shining glory, their images may be useful to illustrate Knowledge.
1503:. Why aren't some of those unique stars in the Special Stars section? Why is the MJ story not in the Homage section? Is the Disneyland star the same type of unofficial star in the Special Stars section? If one-word stage names are unusual, shouldn't that be in Rule Adjustments? If the Chevy star uses the Chevy logo, shouldn't that be up with the Apollo 11 stars? I want to note that I don't even think that some of these facts are relevant enough to be in the article at all, but these are all just examples of how the lines between U&U and the rest of the article have completely blurred because it's just a trivia section with no clear boundaries. We simply
683:
671:
813:
436:
286:
1121:
589:
562:
599:
366:
1680:. This is the biggest in the world visual tribute to thousands of notable entertainers. An also, the stars are the main attraction for millions of tourists coming here from all over the planet to see and enjoy the place. Thus images of some notable stars may be a bonus to Knowledge. Indeed, illustrating this and other articles adequately and in a thoughtful manner is a good way to enhance Knowledge.
743:
719:
262:
232:
753:
427:
1211:
925:
845:
490:
469:
1107:
1617:
to enhance WP articles with such, there is no meaningful difference. I believe you are unreasonable in NOT addressing the issue at all here, instead engaging in ad hominum derision and threat. TashaB 19:48, 3 September 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by
Natasha Behrendt (talk • contribs)
1581:
section "References and
Citations" explain exactly this case as the acceptable exception: 1) this website serves as BOTH an in-text reference (K. M. Williamson's comments/data on specific points) and 2) this website also serves as an official source external link "specifically devoted to the topic" .
1616:
Please be respectful and address the issue at hand that I have detailed, instead of completely avoiding the specific points and justifications that have been presented on the
Hollywood Walk of Fame TALK PAGE. My edits stand on their own merit. If I esteem the Smithsonian's online archive and strive
1490:
that you reverted. The justification is that an editor named the section Unique and
Unusual, and that therefore justifies unusual facts, which you define as including 16 out of 2500. First, I'd suggest then that maybe the scope of this article shouldn't just be anything "unusual", and second, I see
1419:
The phrase "1.3 miles (2.1 km) east to west on
Hollywood Boulevard from Gower Street to La Brea Avenue, plus a short segment of Marshfield Way that runs diagonally between Hollywood and La Brea; and 0.4 miles (0.64 km) north to south on Vine Street between Yucca Street and Sunset Boulevard" means a
1495:
level of citation backing that up (Edit: e.g., perhaps a rule that says that usually entertainers must go by their full name?). Otherwise we have an unsourced single-sentence paragraph included because of an editorial decision about the definition of the word unusual. This is, like, four problems
1672:
due to multiple problems. It really took me hours of walking, waiting for the right light, and cleaning the dirt and food droppings off of three Frank
Sinatra stars before taking about fifty shots, of which only three resulted in producing good images. There is so much interference caused by the
1624:
I beg your pardon? Please restrict your comments on this article TALK page to specific points of my edit's justification. Regarding your stand-alone personal attack above, I have clearly disclosed I have no relationship whatsoever with the Public Art in Public Places organization and archive.
1667:
styled article. But, at the same time, wikipedia is so comprehensive, illustrative and, as a result, so popular, because millions of appropriate pictures do perfectly support the textual content. On a practical note, it is really not that easy to take good photos of some stars on the
1191:
These are just a few of the things I notice with this at the moment. I will give a more detailed review later on. I have placed this on hold for 7 days to allow fixes to these and other issues that will arise. I agree with Fetch though, a tad premature but may be able to be fixed.
1300:
I personally see no efforts to address these mistakes, which are just a few of many that I see. I am getting concerned that no one cares about this nom. Therefore, I am allowing only one additional day to fix these mistakes and if you wish a time extension, please email me.
1486:: we still have a lot of single-sentence paragraphs, particularly in U&U, and there is still a lot of haphazard sourcing justified only by a bunch of hidden notes that just say "go read CALC". That's just not a recipe for improving this article. Lets take this
1607:
Assistance please: the following editor "Seraphimblade" is attempting to slam and harass my editing efforts and profile, refusing to respond to my explanation above of satisfying WP:EL criteria. This editor ACCUSES ME OF PAID EDITING with NO EVIDENCE
1625:
Unfounded attacks are uncivil behavior, and have no place on an article TALK page or on WP anywhere. Since you have twice declined to address the specific edit, you should self-revert. TashaB (talk) 19:58, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
1866:
896:
166:
1538:
1582:
The external link website includes additional relevant detail (technical data: dimensions, images, etc.) that "are too detailed for the article" . Thank you, TashaB 17:03, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
1432:
I assume the length of the walk is given is as the length of street, curb, or sidewalk, counted only once even where there are two rows, not as row-miles (the total of the lengths of the two rows).
1707:
1366:
I just read that Donald Trump has a star on the Walk of Fame. I think this qualifies him to be considered an unusual recipient as while he is entertaining, he has not had a big career in the arts.
544:
696:
572:
1706:
Austin Mikel Clay was not bailed out of jail by James Otis. Robert De Niro bailed him out. James keeps telling people this and it's just not true. Please fix this mistake if you can. Thank you.
1429:
I assume the "6-foot (1.8 m) intervals" statement is how far apart the stars in each row are, so in the areas with 2 rows, each star is 3 feet (0.9 m) from nearest the stars in the other row.
1474:
reverted without any engagement as to my original reasons for trimming. This despite the fact that I've brought up the trivia-like and sometimes badly-sourced nature of much of the page
1491:
absolutely nothing unusual about stars being identified by their stage name or what they were most known by. If that is in fact unusual--which I grant is completely possible--it needs
1068:
by them in order for the reviewer to move on to the next stage of reviewing. If one said fail, there will be in indication as to why. The reviewer will indicate the final status here:
1577:
I am sorry to have to revert - the last deletion of the external link to the official public art data website on the Public Art in Public Places archive was incorrect. Please note:
930:
822:
729:
160:
297:
1482:. I would have appreciated your input then, and I'd like it now, because frankly the article still shows some of the same problems that killed the GAN all the way back in
223:
1791:
1397:. While most stars are awarded for contributions to scripted performances, reality TV is, for better or for worse, part of "the arts", and 14 seasons is a big career.
963:
57:
1836:
1831:
1423:
The phrase "over 2,600 stars, spaced at 6-foot (1.8 m) intervals" means the length is at least 15600 feet (4680 m), which corresponds to almost 3 miles (5 km).
701:
1856:
953:
1821:
661:
651:
935:
1228:
There are quite a few unsourced areas, e.g., in the "Unique and unusual" and "Entertainers in politics" sections (and also elsewhere). This is Not Good™.
92:
1851:
1781:
1776:
1132:
First I would like to Thank Fetch for stepping in with the suggestions, I have just placed this on hold to allow for some addressing of some issues.
1841:
1806:
1796:
1786:
534:
1647:
1597:
1826:
1766:
1621:
I already have. (I also note you avoided the discussion of undisclosed paid editing). Seraphimblade Talk to me 19:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
1475:
1464:, I appreciate the work you've done on this article but trimming this section and others like it is also something that I've done before and
627:
440:
272:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
98:
1234:
Not all the images have captions. In the case that a visually impaired user comes across this article, they won't know whose star is whose.
1816:
1438:
Somewhere who knows which the measurements are for each for each row separately and which aren't, please fix the article to make it clear.
1383:
312:
1711:
1861:
1439:
1398:
307:
181:
1347:
1152:
Prose seems slightly off. You seem to have very short paragraphs that can be merged into other sections and make them more detailed.
1021:
1017:
510:
148:
1801:
1282:
873:
612:
567:
412:
378:
306:
at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
1771:
1559:
1521:
981:
958:
771:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
349:
303:
112:
43:
1846:
388:
384:
117:
33:
869:
783:
775:
87:
1260:
497:
474:
449:
142:
285:
78:
884:
1739:
1691:
1686:
1643:
1593:
1394:
1390:
865:
779:
766:
724:
688:
231:
198:
138:
1504:
1161:
You use very in-descriptive titles for your headings, instead of "Location" you should say something more formal.
242:
1811:
1578:
1248:
Section titles are at times too informal; e.g., "On the outside looking in" and "Location, location, location".
1499:
I obviously don't care that much about that particular sentence, but I think it's very strongly indicative of
188:
1243:
All the images are on the right side. Can they be distributed on both sides for a more engaging presentation?
1443:
1402:
122:
1677:
1669:
1542:
977:
37:
1681:
1639:
1589:
1327:
455:
1426:
Much father down, it mentions that there are now two rows of stars, which are staggered (alternating).
365:
1635:
1585:
1382:
I believe the star was to honor him for his role as the star and host of the first 14 seasons of the
1310:
1277:
1084:
1000:
426:
154:
1553:
1515:
812:
670:
174:
68:
626:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
509:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1237:
247:
83:
1663:
set of stars is quite enough for this article for now. We do not need to have a slideshow, or a
1507:, and I don't see that happening as long as the article exists in its current state. Cheers,
1268:
Personally, I feel this nom is a tad premature, but I'll let Joe handle that part :). Thanks,
604:
64:
1500:
1323:
1254:
244:
1545:
on this page. If that does not demonstrate that this page has become bloated listcruft...
1459:
1303:
1272:
1225:
Well, Joe hasn't said anything for over a week, so I'm popping in to give a few comments:
1077:
993:
1184:
Multiple
Sections Lacking Sourcing (Can be failed for this, I will give hold time though)
1733:
1546:
1508:
1337:
1251:
Has anyone given this an in-depth copyedit? That might help resolve some prose issues.
1120:
1760:
1660:
1231:
The prose is quite choppy; in a lot of places there are single-sentence paragraphs.
1746:
1715:
1696:
1566:
1528:
1447:
1406:
1377:
1353:
1331:
1316:
1289:
1090:
1006:
588:
561:
246:
1336:
For reasons already mentioned (1+ month without work done), I'm failing this GA.
770:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can
758:
1505:
have to have some way of differentiating important facts from unimportant ones
1420:
total length of 1.7 miles (2.74 km), which corresponds to 8976 feet (2740 m).
748:
742:
718:
678:
622:
617:
594:
1726:
372:
1501:
the sorts of problems that this page and especially the U&U section has
984:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
1722:
1367:
787:
489:
468:
1020:. This is how the article, as of March 13, 2011, compares against the
1322:
Suggest that you fail this right now, it has dragged on far too long.
1664:
888:
1721:
That needs a source, and at present I don't see one. In fact, I see
1206:
if there is no response where these changes are significantly fixed.
506:
502:
1867:
Knowledge requested photographs in Los Angeles County, California
1435:
But this isn't really stated clearly anywhere in the article.
839:
420:
256:
248:
28:
15:
1416:
Need the beginning, the article has an apparent discrepancy:
267:
This article was cited as a source in a U.S. court decision,
1060:
All pass fine. No fails. Will move into the detailed review.
843:
811:
669:
1125:
Working on initial look over, review posted in 1-2 days....
1573:
Reference is also an External link (unusual, but correct)
616:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
1487:
1471:
1468:
1465:
342:
1676:
And in the end, the stars are the quintessence of the
1143:
You use some peacock words in there, like "fantastic".
1046:
4. Article is not subject of recent/current edit war?:
173:
1541:
is currently listed or mentioned in some form in the
371:
Facts from this article were featured on Knowledge's
1479:
872:. Please replace this template with a more specific
501:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
316:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
46:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1614:
786:. To improve this article, please refer to the
187:
8:
1633:
1583:
913:
782:. To use this banner, please refer to the
713:
556:
463:
321:
280:
887:may be able to locate suitable images on
298:Social sciences and society good articles
1792:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Arts
1708:2600:1700:9BD0:1610:5471:BA5C:9B53:290B
944:
916:
715:
558:
465:
424:
1016:This article was assessed against the
1395:versions in about two dozen countries
7:
1837:Los Angeles area task force articles
1832:High-importance Los Angeles articles
1052:5. Changing in article is not rapid?
1029:1. No obvious non-reliable sources?:
764:This article is within the scope of
610:This article is within the scope of
495:This article is within the scope of
1857:American cinema task force articles
454:It is of interest to the following
36:for discussing improvements to the
1822:Mid-importance California articles
1012:Quick-Fail Good Article Assessment
271:, 342 F. Supp. 2d 474 (2004). See
269:Demmon v. Loudoun County Pub. Schs
14:
1539:List of fictional characters page
885:Openverse Creative Commons Search
820:This article is supported by the
1852:C-Class American cinema articles
1782:Knowledge vital articles in Arts
1777:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
1483:
1261:Some deadlinks that need tagging
1209:
1177:Added 20:26, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
1119:
1105:
1041:3. No outstanding cleanup tags?:
780:regional and topical task forces
751:
741:
717:
681:
636:Knowledge:WikiProject California
597:
587:
560:
488:
467:
434:
425:
364:
284:
260:
230:
58:Click here to start a new topic.
1842:WikiProject California articles
1389:, which eventually grew into a
1136:Added 21:50 27 March 2011 (UTC)
982:Talk:Hollywood Walk of Fame/GA1
656:This article has been rated as
639:Template:WikiProject California
539:This article has been rated as
1807:Mid-importance awards articles
1797:C-Class vital articles in Arts
1787:C-Class level-5 vital articles
302:nominee, but did not meet the
1:
1567:05:14, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
1529:04:02, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
694:This article is supported by
630:and see a list of open tasks.
513:and see a list of open tasks.
55:Put new text under old text.
1827:C-Class Los Angeles articles
1767:Former good article nominees
1064:These items all need to say
1058:Reason for Closure Decision:
519:Knowledge:WikiProject Awards
1817:C-Class California articles
1496:rolled into one sentence.
1384:original (U.S.) version of
1204:21:50, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
862:sports entertainment symbol
697:Los Angeles area task force
522:Template:WikiProject Awards
273:Knowledge as a court source
63:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1883:
1579:WP:External Links in lists
1453:Unique and unusual section
1448:19:31, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
1407:19:51, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
1354:03:03, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
1332:02:05, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
1317:23:44, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
1290:02:13, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
1127:01:18, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
1114:21:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
1091:23:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
1007:19:27, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
823:American cinema task force
796:Knowledge:WikiProject Film
689:Greater Los Angeles portal
662:project's importance scale
310:. Editors may also seek a
1862:WikiProject Film articles
1747:18:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
1716:18:08, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
1659:I may tend to agree that
1378:20:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
819:
799:Template:WikiProject Film
736:
677:
655:
582:
538:
483:
462:
324:
320:
93:Be welcoming to newcomers
22:Skip to table of contents
1697:19:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
1412:Please clarify distances
1195:This is to be closed as
852:It is requested that an
21:
1802:C-Class awards articles
1655:Images of notable stars
1772:C-Class vital articles
1702:Hollywood Walk of Fame
1678:Hollywood walk of fame
1630:
1170:Article has deadlinks.
881:Free Image Search Tool
874:media request template
848:
816:
674:
613:WikiProject California
292:Hollywood Walk of Fame
88:avoid personal attacks
38:Hollywood Walk of Fame
1847:C-Class film articles
1480:just this past summer
1240:should also be added.
847:
815:
673:
441:level-5 vital article
304:good article criteria
224:Auto-archiving period
113:Neutral point of view
1111:Hasn't yet been done
891:and other web sites.
350:Good article nominee
118:No original research
1753:New Category Symbol
1022:quick fail criteria
1018:quick fail criteria
870:improve its quality
868:in this article to
772:join the discussion
642:California articles
1543:equivalent section
1535:Every single entry
1349:Operation Big Bear
1035:2. Is it neutral?:
849:
817:
675:
498:WikiProject Awards
450:content assessment
325:Article milestones
99:dispute resolution
60:
1651:
1638:comment added by
1601:
1588:comment added by
1215:Addressing Issues
972:
971:
905:
904:
892:
838:
837:
834:
833:
830:
829:
774:and see lists of
712:
711:
708:
707:
605:California portal
555:
554:
551:
550:
419:
418:
359:
358:
279:
278:
255:
254:
79:Assume good faith
56:
27:
26:
1874:
1729:
1694:
1689:
1684:
1640:Natasha Behrendt
1590:Natasha Behrendt
1549:
1511:
1488:most recent edit
1463:
1391:global franchise
1375:
1350:
1344:
1315:
1313:
1307:
1288:
1285:
1280:
1275:
1255:Live performance
1213:
1212:
1208:Current status:
1123:
1113:
1109:
1108:
1089:
1087:
1081:
1071:
1005:
1003:
997:
926:Copyvio detector
914:
901:
899:
878:
876:where possible.
846:
840:
804:
803:
800:
797:
794:
767:WikiProject Film
761:
756:
755:
754:
745:
738:
737:
732:
721:
714:
691:
686:
685:
684:
644:
643:
640:
637:
634:
607:
602:
601:
600:
591:
584:
583:
578:
575:
564:
557:
545:importance scale
527:
526:
523:
520:
517:
492:
485:
484:
479:
471:
464:
447:
438:
437:
430:
429:
421:
413:February 8, 2021
409:February 8, 2020
405:February 8, 2017
401:February 8, 2014
397:February 9, 2008
393:February 9, 2007
389:February 9, 2006
385:February 9, 2005
368:
345:
322:
288:
281:
264:
263:
257:
249:
235:
234:
225:
192:
191:
177:
108:Article policies
29:
16:
1882:
1881:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1812:Awards articles
1757:
1756:
1755:
1727:
1704:
1692:
1687:
1682:
1657:
1631:
1575:
1547:
1509:
1457:
1455:
1414:
1368:
1364:
1352:
1348:
1338:
1311:
1305:
1302:
1298:
1283:
1278:
1273:
1269:
1222:
1210:
1198:
1106:
1104:
1101:
1099:Detailed Review
1085:
1079:
1076:
1069:
1014:
1001:
995:
992:
976:This review is
968:
940:
912:
897:
895:
844:
801:
798:
795:
792:
791:
757:
752:
750:
727:
702:High-importance
687:
682:
680:
641:
638:
635:
632:
631:
603:
598:
596:
576:
570:
525:awards articles
524:
521:
518:
515:
514:
477:
448:on Knowledge's
445:
435:
341:
261:
251:
250:
245:
222:
134:
129:
128:
127:
104:
74:
12:
11:
5:
1880:
1878:
1870:
1869:
1864:
1859:
1854:
1849:
1844:
1839:
1834:
1829:
1824:
1819:
1814:
1809:
1804:
1799:
1794:
1789:
1784:
1779:
1774:
1769:
1759:
1758:
1754:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1703:
1700:
1656:
1653:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1574:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1476:both years ago
1454:
1451:
1413:
1410:
1386:The Apprentice
1363:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1346:
1297:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1258:
1257:is a dab page.
1252:
1249:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1241:
1232:
1229:
1221:
1218:
1196:
1193:
1190:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1179:
1178:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1138:
1137:
1131:
1129:
1128:
1100:
1097:
1095:
1062:
1061:
1055:
1049:
1043:
1038:
1032:
1013:
1010:
987:
986:
970:
969:
967:
966:
961:
956:
950:
947:
946:
942:
941:
939:
938:
936:External links
933:
928:
922:
919:
918:
911:
908:
903:
902:
893:
877:
850:
836:
835:
832:
831:
828:
827:
818:
808:
807:
805:
763:
762:
746:
734:
733:
722:
710:
709:
706:
705:
693:
692:
676:
666:
665:
658:Mid-importance
654:
648:
647:
645:
628:the discussion
609:
608:
592:
580:
579:
577:Mid‑importance
565:
553:
552:
549:
548:
541:Mid-importance
537:
531:
530:
528:
511:the discussion
493:
481:
480:
478:Mid‑importance
472:
460:
459:
453:
431:
417:
416:
379:On this day...
369:
361:
360:
357:
356:
353:
346:
343:April 19, 2011
338:
337:
334:
331:
327:
326:
318:
317:
289:
277:
276:
265:
253:
252:
243:
241:
240:
237:
236:
194:
193:
131:
130:
126:
125:
120:
115:
106:
105:
103:
102:
95:
90:
81:
75:
73:
72:
61:
52:
51:
48:
47:
41:
25:
24:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1879:
1868:
1865:
1863:
1860:
1858:
1855:
1853:
1850:
1848:
1845:
1843:
1840:
1838:
1835:
1833:
1830:
1828:
1825:
1823:
1820:
1818:
1815:
1813:
1810:
1808:
1805:
1803:
1800:
1798:
1795:
1793:
1790:
1788:
1785:
1783:
1780:
1778:
1775:
1773:
1770:
1768:
1765:
1764:
1762:
1752:
1748:
1745:
1743:
1742:
1737:
1736:
1730:
1724:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1701:
1699:
1698:
1695:
1690:
1685:
1679:
1674:
1671:
1666:
1662:
1661:Frank Sinatra
1654:
1652:
1649:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1623:
1622:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1580:
1572:
1568:
1565:
1563:
1562:
1557:
1556:
1550:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1527:
1525:
1524:
1519:
1518:
1512:
1506:
1502:
1497:
1494:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1470:
1467:
1461:
1452:
1450:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1436:
1433:
1430:
1427:
1424:
1421:
1417:
1411:
1409:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1387:
1380:
1379:
1376:
1373:
1372:
1361:
1355:
1351:
1345:
1343:
1342:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1314:
1309:
1308:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1286:
1281:
1276:
1267:
1262:
1259:
1256:
1253:
1250:
1247:
1242:
1239:
1236:
1235:
1233:
1230:
1227:
1226:
1224:
1223:
1219:
1217:
1216:
1207:
1203:
1201:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1176:
1175:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1112:
1098:
1096:
1093:
1092:
1088:
1083:
1082:
1074:
1067:
1059:
1056:
1053:
1050:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1039:
1036:
1033:
1030:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1023:
1019:
1011:
1009:
1008:
1004:
999:
998:
991:
985:
983:
979:
974:
973:
965:
962:
960:
957:
955:
952:
951:
949:
948:
943:
937:
934:
932:
929:
927:
924:
923:
921:
920:
915:
909:
907:
900:
894:
890:
886:
882:
875:
871:
867:
863:
859:
855:
851:
842:
841:
825:
824:
814:
810:
809:
806:
802:film articles
789:
785:
784:documentation
781:
777:
773:
769:
768:
760:
749:
747:
744:
740:
739:
735:
731:
726:
723:
720:
716:
703:
700:(assessed as
699:
698:
690:
679:
672:
668:
667:
663:
659:
653:
650:
649:
646:
629:
625:
624:
619:
615:
614:
606:
595:
593:
590:
586:
585:
581:
574:
569:
566:
563:
559:
546:
542:
536:
533:
532:
529:
512:
508:
504:
500:
499:
494:
491:
487:
486:
482:
476:
473:
470:
466:
461:
457:
451:
443:
442:
432:
428:
423:
422:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
380:
374:
370:
367:
363:
362:
354:
352:
351:
347:
344:
340:
339:
335:
332:
329:
328:
323:
319:
315:
314:
309:
305:
301:
300:
299:
293:
290:
287:
283:
282:
274:
270:
266:
259:
258:
239:
238:
233:
229:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
200:
196:
195:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
133:
132:
124:
123:Verifiability
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
110:
109:
100:
96:
94:
91:
89:
85:
82:
80:
77:
76:
70:
66:
65:Learn to edit
62:
59:
54:
53:
50:
49:
45:
39:
35:
31:
30:
23:
20:
18:
17:
1740:
1734:
1731:
1723:the opposite
1705:
1675:
1658:
1634:— Preceding
1632:
1615:
1584:— Preceding
1576:
1560:
1554:
1551:
1534:
1522:
1516:
1513:
1498:
1492:
1472:unilaterally
1456:
1440:47.139.42.34
1437:
1434:
1431:
1428:
1425:
1422:
1418:
1415:
1399:47.139.42.34
1385:
1381:
1370:
1369:
1365:
1362:Donald Trump
1340:
1339:
1304:
1299:
1296:Final Chance
1270:
1214:
1205:
1199:
1194:
1189:
1130:
1124:
1110:
1103:
1102:
1094:
1078:
1072:
1065:
1063:
1057:
1051:
1045:
1040:
1034:
1028:
1015:
994:
989:
988:
975:
964:Instructions
906:
861:
857:
853:
821:
765:
695:
657:
621:
611:
540:
496:
456:WikiProjects
439:
376:
348:
313:reassessment
311:
296:
295:
291:
268:
227:
197:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
107:
32:This is the
1608:whatsoever.
1324:Jezhotwells
1220:Suggestions
978:transcluded
759:Film portal
573:Los Angeles
308:renominated
161:free images
44:not a forum
1761:Categories
1460:DoctorJoeE
931:Authorship
917:GA toolbox
858:photograph
788:guidelines
776:open tasks
633:California
623:California
618:U.S. state
568:California
383:column on
355:Not listed
1341:Wizardman
990:Reviewer:
954:Templates
945:Reviewing
910:GA Review
444:is rated
373:Main Page
101:if needed
84:Be polite
34:talk page
1670:sidewalk
1648:contribs
1636:unsigned
1598:contribs
1586:unsigned
1306:JoeGazz
1238:Alt text
1080:JoeGazz
996:JoeGazz
959:Criteria
866:included
730:American
228:180 days
199:Archives
69:get help
42:This is
40:article.
1537:on the
1393:, with
660:on the
543:on the
446:C-class
375:in the
333:Process
167:WP refs
155:scholar
1688:shelok
1665:comics
898:Upload
889:Flickr
516:Awards
507:prizes
503:awards
475:Awards
452:scale.
411:, and
336:Result
294:was a
139:Google
1741:edits
1693:honov
1683:Steve
1561:edits
1523:edits
1279:COMMS
1274:ƒETCH
980:from
854:image
433:This
182:JSTOR
143:books
97:Seek
1735:chat
1728:Alyo
1712:talk
1644:talk
1594:talk
1555:chat
1548:Nole
1517:chat
1510:Nole
1493:some
1484:2011
1478:and
1469:have
1444:talk
1403:talk
1328:talk
1200:Fail
1073:Pass
1066:Pass
1054:Pass
1048:Pass
1037:Pass
1031:Pass
879:The
793:Film
778:and
725:Film
505:and
330:Date
175:FENS
149:news
86:and
1466:you
1202:on:
883:or
864:be
860:of
856:or
652:Mid
620:of
535:Mid
189:TWL
1763::
1725:.
1714:)
1650:)
1646:•
1600:)
1596:•
1446:)
1405:)
1374:iz
1330:)
1312:▲
1086:▲
1075:—
1024::
1002:▲
728::
704:).
571::
407:,
403:,
399:,
395:,
391:,
387:,
226::
218:,
214:,
210:,
206:,
169:)
67:;
1744:)
1738:·
1732:(
1710:(
1642:(
1592:(
1564:)
1558:·
1552:(
1526:)
1520:·
1514:(
1462::
1458:@
1442:(
1401:(
1371:L
1326:(
1284:/
1271:/
1263:.
1197:✗
1070:✓
826:.
790:.
664:.
547:.
458::
415:.
381:"
377:"
275:.
220:5
216:4
212:3
208:2
204:1
201::
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
71:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.