Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Holtzman Inkblot Technique

Source đź“ť

158: 259: 74: 179: 53: 22: 348: 548:'test standardization' section, it talks about correlations but never clarifies what variables these correlations exist between - correlation of scores between different test-takers' scores? I find it unclear how to interpret the sentence "The test correlations ranged from .36 for Popular and .81 for normal adults. " in general. 84: 547:
The section states "Many different variables apply when scoring.", then moves onto a list. The text suggests it would be a list of variables applied in scoring, but in fact it appears to be a list of criteria required for a variable to be considered as something to be applied in scoring. Also, in the
471:
I am proposing to expand this article by adding historical information on Holtzman's concept, as well as providing information on how the inkblot test has effected and helped the illnesses. I would greatly enjoy feedback an help with this if possible. Thanks!
291:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the 491:
How on earth is the price of the test relevant to the article? That price could be in Australian or US or Canadian dollars (or some other country's dollar), and in any region where that currency is not used, that price is meaningless.
389: 326: 358: 758: 316: 383: 661: 657: 643: 763: 753: 280: 292: 241: 140: 743: 728: 231: 130: 287: 264: 748: 738: 733: 723: 207: 106: 402: 555: 186: 163: 97: 58: 493: 629: 639:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
525:
I have removed the cost and insurance plan details, as they were unsourced, seemed irrelevant, and read like a semi-advertisement.
434: 33: 206:
related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
704: 417: 613: 587: 660:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
595: 559: 530: 39: 21: 695: 621: 583: 497: 461: 442: 551: 477: 679:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
667: 512: 105:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
620:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 590:, the technique is clearly given three upper case letters. Why is this styling not also employed here? 575: 507:
Furthermore, the cited source (a dictionary) mentions neither the price nor what it would include. --
397: 591: 526: 630:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120108144141/http://www.kids-iq-tests.com/Holtzman-Inkblot-Test.html
457: 438: 664:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
680: 473: 89: 508: 178: 157: 687: 633: 709: 646:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 599: 563: 534: 516: 501: 481: 465: 446: 363: 279: 258: 686:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
653: 717: 199: 195: 579: 73: 52: 652:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 203: 102: 79: 191: 411: 378: 347: 356:
for Knowledge (XXG)'s health content are defined in the guideline
342: 15: 624:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
634:
http://www.kids-iq-tests.com/Holtzman-Inkblot-Test.html
617: 359:
Knowledge (XXG):Identifying reliable sources (medicine)
437:. Any special reason why we are not adhering to it? 190:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 656:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 403:
clinical publications about evidence-based medicine
456:capitlaized everywhere which is the exception. 642:This message was posted before February 2018. 433:This article's title appears in violation of 301:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Alternative Views 8: 19: 612:I have just modified one external link on 253: 152: 47: 759:Low-importance Alternative Views articles 384:review articles from the past five years 255: 154: 49: 764:WikiProject Alternative Views articles 754:Start-Class Alternative Views articles 304:Template:WikiProject Alternative Views 216:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Skepticism 115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Psychology 7: 412:Centre for Reviews and Dissemination 285:This article is within the scope of 184:This article is within the scope of 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 744:Low-importance Skepticism articles 729:Low-importance psychology articles 14: 616:. Please take a moment to review 409:Other potential sources include: 346: 278: 257: 177: 156: 82: 72: 51: 20: 749:WikiProject Skepticism articles 739:Start-Class Skepticism articles 734:WikiProject Psychology articles 724:Start-Class psychology articles 321:This article has been rated as 236:This article has been rated as 219:Template:WikiProject Skepticism 135:This article has been rated as 118:Template:WikiProject Psychology 482:21:19, 22 September 2011 (UTC) 1: 502:09:13, 29 November 2011 (UTC) 370:sources of information about 288:WikiProject Alternative views 210:and see a list of open tasks. 109:and see a list of open tasks. 564:13:43, 23 October 2014 (UTC) 535:09:28, 2 February 2013 (UTC) 517:01:42, 2 February 2013 (UTC) 600:16:54, 8 January 2017 (UTC) 780: 710:05:52, 23 March 2017 (UTC) 673:(last update: 5 June 2024) 614:Holtzman inkblot technique 609:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 466:16:53, 25 April 2009 (UTC) 447:19:50, 24 April 2009 (UTC) 372:Holtzman Inkblot Technique 327:project's importance scale 307:Alternative Views articles 242:project's importance scale 141:project's importance scale 320: 273: 235: 172: 134: 67: 46: 452:Never mind, it seems it 605:External links modified 543:description of scoring 187:WikiProject Skepticism 98:WikiProject Psychology 28:This article is rated 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 654:regular verification 390:free review articles 366:. Here are links to 644:After February 2018 574:In sources such as 222:Skepticism articles 121:psychology articles 698:InternetArchiveBot 649:InternetArchiveBot 487:The price is wrong 362:and are typically 34:content assessment 674: 554:comment added by 426: 425: 341: 340: 337: 336: 333: 332: 298:Alternative Views 265:Alternative Views 252: 251: 248: 247: 151: 150: 147: 146: 90:Psychology portal 771: 708: 699: 672: 671: 650: 566: 350: 343: 309: 308: 305: 302: 299: 282: 275: 274: 269: 261: 254: 224: 223: 220: 217: 214: 181: 174: 173: 168: 160: 153: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 85: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 779: 778: 774: 773: 772: 770: 769: 768: 714: 713: 702: 697: 665: 658:have permission 648: 622:this simple FaQ 607: 572: 556:131.169.205.124 549: 545: 489: 431: 368:possibly useful 364:review articles 306: 303: 300: 297: 296: 267: 221: 218: 215: 212: 211: 166: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 83: 81: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 777: 775: 767: 766: 761: 756: 751: 746: 741: 736: 731: 726: 716: 715: 692: 691: 684: 637: 636: 628:Added archive 606: 603: 592:Martinevans123 571: 568: 544: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 527:Martinevans123 520: 519: 488: 485: 469: 468: 430: 427: 424: 423: 422: 421: 407: 394: 375: 351: 339: 338: 335: 334: 331: 330: 323:Low-importance 319: 313: 312: 310: 283: 271: 270: 268:Low‑importance 262: 250: 249: 246: 245: 238:Low-importance 234: 228: 227: 225: 208:the discussion 182: 170: 169: 167:Low‑importance 161: 149: 148: 145: 144: 137:Low-importance 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 776: 765: 762: 760: 757: 755: 752: 750: 747: 745: 742: 740: 737: 735: 732: 730: 727: 725: 722: 721: 719: 712: 711: 706: 701: 700: 689: 685: 682: 678: 677: 676: 669: 663: 659: 655: 651: 645: 640: 635: 631: 627: 626: 625: 623: 619: 615: 610: 604: 602: 601: 597: 593: 589: 585: 581: 577: 569: 567: 565: 561: 557: 553: 542: 536: 532: 528: 524: 523: 522: 521: 518: 514: 510: 506: 505: 504: 503: 499: 495: 486: 484: 483: 479: 475: 467: 463: 459: 458:Garycompugeek 455: 451: 450: 449: 448: 444: 440: 439:Garycompugeek 436: 428: 420: 419: 414: 413: 408: 405: 404: 399: 398:TRIP database 395: 392: 391: 386: 385: 380: 377: 376: 373: 369: 365: 361: 360: 355: 354:Ideal sources 352: 349: 345: 344: 328: 324: 318: 315: 314: 311: 294: 290: 289: 284: 281: 277: 276: 272: 266: 263: 260: 256: 243: 239: 233: 230: 229: 226: 209: 205: 201: 200:pseudohistory 197: 196:pseudoscience 193: 189: 188: 183: 180: 176: 175: 171: 165: 162: 159: 155: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 696: 693: 668:source check 647: 641: 638: 611: 608: 573: 570:Article name 550:— Preceding 546: 494:58.175.33.82 490: 474:Valencia4723 470: 453: 432: 416: 410: 401: 388: 382: 371: 367: 357: 353: 322: 286: 237: 185: 136: 96: 40:WikiProjects 509:un4v41l48l3 30:Start-class 718:Categories 705:Report bug 387:(limit to 293:discussion 213:Skepticism 204:skepticism 164:Skepticism 112:Psychology 103:Psychology 59:Psychology 688:this tool 681:this tool 400:provides 381:provides 694:Cheers.— 552:unsigned 618:my edit 435:WP:NAME 325:on the 240:on the 192:science 139:on the 578:, and 379:PubMed 36:scale. 429:Title 596:talk 588:this 586:and 584:this 582:and 580:this 576:this 560:talk 531:talk 513:talk 498:talk 478:talk 462:talk 443:talk 415:and 396:The 202:and 662:RfC 632:to 418:CDC 317:Low 232:Low 131:Low 720:: 675:. 670:}} 666:{{ 598:) 562:) 533:) 515:) 500:) 480:) 464:) 454:is 445:) 198:, 194:, 707:) 703:( 690:. 683:. 594:( 558:( 529:( 511:( 496:( 476:( 460:( 441:( 406:. 393:) 374:. 329:. 295:. 244:. 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Psychology
WikiProject icon
Psychology portal
WikiProject Psychology
Psychology
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Skepticism
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Skepticism
science
pseudoscience
pseudohistory
skepticism
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Alternative Views
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Alternative views
discussion
Low
project's importance scale

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑