Talk:Hamas/Archive 10 - Knowledge (XXG)

1581:, Article 34: "The Council shall take measures and promote cooperation...contributing to the pursuit of the objectives of the Union...To that end, acting unanimously on the initiative of any Member State or of the Commission, the Council may: (a) adopt common positions defining the approach of the Union to a particular matter..." etc. The source in question states: "the Council has concluded that the persons, groups and entities listed in the Annex to this Decision have been involved in terrorist acts within the meaning of Article 1(2) and (3) of Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism..." Now, if we want to quibble over the semantics of the source, whether "...groups... have been involved in terrorists acts" are "terrorist groups, I'm willing to acquiesce to a different wording. I'm going to add into the article, then, that the EU "lists Hamas as a group 'involved in terrorist attacks.'" Is this agreeable? If not, why?-- 1003:

editorial opinion, along with other sources that would back up the Telegraph? The National Review is also a very conservative magasine. MEMRI has ties to conservative think tanks in the US and has been criticised as a selectively biased propagandist by Brian Whitaker of The Guardian, unbiased by Norman Finkelstein, and inbalanced by former US ambassador William Rugh. Ken Livingstone, former London mayor, accused MEMRI of distortion. Juan Cole, U of M Middle East History professor and RAND director Bruce Hoffman have accused MEMRI of mistranslation. Le Monde Diplomatique has even demonstrated that MEMRI removes content before translating or adds words that did not exist in the original. MEMRI cannot be considered a reliable source, either for original academic work or for translations. We are left, then, with the Palestine Media Watch. Again, the Telegraph might be acceptable, but given that its producers are conservative, I would like to see other supporting references from less biased sources.

1142:

Murdoch. I would not consider the News Corporation to be a reliable source of information about American politics or the Arab/Muslim world. You are also right about magasines. My conern lies with magasines that have an obvious political slant one way or another. For example, Counterpunch is extremely liberal; National Review is very conservative; and US News & World Report is horribly anti-Palestinian. I would not use National Review or Counterpunch for information related to Barack Obama's policies, nor would I reference US News & World Report for anything about the Middle East. The conservative slant of National Review does indeed have me suspicious about anything that they would say about anything Palestinian. Regarding

4822:

Palestine. ... Ironically, the Israeli authorities at first encouraged Hamas in the hope of weakening the secular nationalism of the PLO. But the Palestinian uprising had But the Palestinian uprising had a radicalizing effect on Hamas, and its members began to step outside the bounds of the law. Although the Israelis repeatedly cracked down on the organization, the roots it put down sprouted again, giving rise to more violence each time. In 1989 the Israelis arrested Yassin and kept him in prison until 1997. Hamas, however, continued to shift from the use of stones to the use of firearms. In 1994 it began, through its military wing, to launch suicide bombs inside Israel.

4918:"Hamas, originating in the Muslim Brotherhood movement, emphasizes social work, the abstention from violent activity against the PA regime, and most importantly the concept of 'sabr' -- patience and perseverance. Approximately 90 percent of its work is in social, welfare, cultural and educational activities. These are important elements of Hamas's popularity that keep it closely tied to the public. Hamas is more effective than most PA institutions, which is not surprising considering the difficulties and corruption of the PA. Its only real competitors are several nongovernmental organizations that cannot or do not want to translate their work into political influence." 5475:

source, a CFR (which is not an "objective" organization nor, in my opinion, a reliable source on the subject matter) report on Hamas once again makes a reference to the work of another individual whose objectivity is no more established than that of the CFR itself. The third source doesn't seem to make mention of that figure at all, that I can see... Perhaps I missed it. But at this point, I would call that figure tenuously-sourced at best, and certainly not sourced well enough to state it in the definitive article narrative or use it as justification for the contents of the lead paragraph. I'd be interested in the opinions of others on this, of course. —

833:: my apologies. I was tired and thought it was a continuation of the Human Shield topic again so please read my post in that light. If your quote is on another topic (Themes of martyrdom) then I have no problem with it. As for the propaganda accusation, it was not directed at you personally, I noticed that some nuetral statements in the article have been slightly reworded to make Hamas appear more "evil"? and a few incidents added that even Israel doesn't blame Hamas for. I then read your post and jumped the gun. I have no problem with your editing and applaud your explanations of edits and acceptance of critism in talk. Keep up the good work. 2637:'It was more than just a blind-eye policy. Believing that a strengthened Brotherhood would weaken the PLO's influence in the territories, the Israelis were reported to have gone so far as to channel funding to mosques and various Islamic institutions in the territories, knowing full well that they were controlled by the Brotherhood. There were even rumors that they armed the Brothers against the nationalist groups. The nationalists thus claimed that the Brotherhood was little more than an Israeli puppet; the Brotherhood, in turn, argued that the nationalists were agents of a Jewish plot whose true aim was the extirpation of Islam. 756:(removed indent) Hey there Wayne, thanks for the feedback. I remember your original criticisms regarding this inclusion; you were an important element in having the entry rephrased to the improved form. I was certain to make sure it’s not a statement concluding that Hamas use human shields, instead framing it more accurately as a notable piece of information relating to political themes of martyrdom. This evidence does not insist that human shields are a Hamas military tactic. Instead, it describes in the briefest fashion that Hamas militancy maintains some themes of martyrdom. This is difficult to dispute. 196:

charitable organizations creating hospitals, educational facilities, and even social welfare. This was considered preferable to Israeli direct governace at a micro-level. At the initial stages, Hamas was primarily such an organization, at least to Israeli perceptions. Furthermore, Israel had been hopeful that organizations such as Hamas would eventually keep terror groups in line, by improving the standard of living. Unfortunately, Hamas quickly adopted a military wing, and Israel's experiment with supporting social organizations for Palestinians came to an end.

4878:

original research and/or conjecture, because the expert says nothing about resource expenditure. "Up to 90% of the work of the government of the USA" is done in non-military areas, but 50% of the budget (resource expenditure) is in military. So the expert is not talking specifically about resource expenditure, we should copy his claim, and leave the background research into the specifics to people who... research. This is not the place for original research or interpreting the experts. We summarize them. Making additional claims is not a summary.

4836:

capital. ... They recalled that Hamas had hitherto refrained from mounting terrorist attacks outside the borders of Israel and the occupied territories. They reasoned that by trying to assassinate Meshal outside these borders, Israel intended to create an intolerable provocation. This would have compelled Hamas to react and to extend its operations to new areas. Israel would have blamed Arafat for the new wave of violence, and the peace process would once again have been put on hold.13

2634:'Six years after Yasin founded the Islamic Center, the Israelis granted it a legal license, which allowed the Islamists a freedom denied their nationalist rivals. In 1978, the Islamic University of Gaza was founded, and it quickly became a major channel through which the Brotherhood could disseminate its doctrine among the youth of the Strip. Israeli acquiescence in the religious and political activities of the Brotherhood continued unabated throughout the late 1970s and 1980s. 2348:: "A perfect Knowledge (XXG) article... is completely neutral and unbiased; it has a neutral point of view, presenting competing views on controversies logically and fairly, and pointing out all sides without favoring particular viewpoints. The most factual and accepted views are emphasized, and minority views are given a lower priority; sufficient information and references are provided so that readers can learn more about particular views." 31: 5113:: "Sheikh Ahmad Yassin as a Muslim was not against the Israelis as citizens or civilians, but he fought against the Israeli occupation. I remember a story has been told to me by Dr. Rantissi, about a time when the the Sheikh and Dr. Rantissi were driving their car at night and found an Israeli who had had an accident. They took him to the hospital and helped him. He did not hate Israelis as Jews, or as civilians, but as occupiers." 448:. Even the Hamas "admittions" of using human shields is deceptive as they are not claiming to deliberately use them but are talking about civilians volunteering to be human shields without being requested to do so. If biased but otherwise reliable sources claim having civilians nearby (not directly associated with militants) is the same as using human shields then it remains POV to make that claim here. 216:"For the Palestinian people death became an industry, at which women excel and so do all people on this land: the elderly excel, the Jihad fighters excel, and the children excel. Accordingly (Palestinians) created a human shield of women, children, the elderly and the Jihad fighters against the Zionist bombing machine, as if they were saying to the Zionist enemy: ‘We desire death as you desire Life’." 4658:

how you would pare the following down: "Jews have lived in the Muslim world for 13 centuries in peace and harmony; they are in our religion 'the people of the book' who have a covenant from God and His Messenger Muhammad (peace be upon him) to be respected and protected." The entire, extended quote should probably be in the body of the article, in the 'accusations of anti-semitism section.

479:

as you desire Life’, ‘death became an industry’, ‘Palestinians created a human shield’). The term ‘martyrdom’ is not negative/positive in and of itself, and the addition of ‘themes’ makes it more conservative as it implies only the mere presence of ‘themes’ within Hamas militancy and political violence. You could even call it ‘Political themes of martyrdom’. How about this:

731:: "We used peaceful demonstrations in the first intifada and Israel used force. We threw stones and they used force, deportations and mass killings. We’re playing inside the body of Israel. It used dirty methods in order to strengthen their existence and to extend their borders. We don’t admire violence, but we have been forced to use methods against Israeli aggression." 693:

as the worst Hamas has been accused of. I believe some soldiers were reprimanded recently for forcing civilians to walk in front of them. Only last week Amnesty International accused the IDF of regularly using Palestinians houses, while refusing to allow the occupants to leave, as observation posts and firing positions. This is an encyclopedia not a propaganda paper.

1711:

government.' The footnote refers to a Time magazine article, which notes that Israeli officials forecast that 'the number of Palestinian rocket attacks could now spike to 200 a day.' In other words, a prediction (which has not been borne out) of what would happen AFTER Israel attacked has been transmogrified into an event that actually occurred BEFORE the attack.

2640:...'The intifada erupted in 1987. With the population mobilised and looking mainly to the PLO for direction, and younger members of the Islamic movement chafing at the bit, Yasin and the Brothers abandoned their former gradualism and entered the fray under the name "the Islamic Resistance Movement", or "Hamas", an acronym possessing the meaning of "zeal"'... 899:, which has been publishing since 1879 and is arguably one of the largest newspapers in Australia. These are at the very least mainstream sources, if not global media heavyweights (esp. The Spectator). That’s not even considering the coverage by organisations like Bridges for Peace (founded in 1976), and secondary reporting from bodies such as Snaphanen 3714:

to just lop it out, along with some anon editor's "Up to 90% of Hamas's work and resources is licking balls and killing little baby's and shaving thier behinds" addition. I also noted above that blindly undoing my last edit would restore that blatant piece of troll material, but it seems that this "G51g7" was either unable or unwilling to heed that.

2222:

Palestine. Nonetheless, there appears to be some dispute on this point, using the argument that Hamas has not established an Islamist government in Gaza (news to me, but there you have it), and therefore does not qualify as an Islamist organization. So I guess we need to get some consensus here: should the group be introduced as "Islamist" or not? —

760:

its inclusion. I would think that the article on Israel would be a more appropriate location. If it’s important to you, perhaps you could try to add it to the Israeli article, as a piece on the IDF disregarding the 6 October (2005) decision from the Israeli High Court of Justice, after the 2002 petition from human rights organizations (e.g.

4096:) should be expanded upon in the body text. I personally would like to get that far, but I've been hopelessly ground down in wildly conflicting debates of too many/too few sources, too short/long, etc. I'm flexible. What do you propose that would keep the informational content and satisfy your structural concerns? 4373:"Notorious for its numerous suicide bombings and other attacks on Israeli civilians and security forces, Hamas also runs extensive social programs and has gained popularity in Palestinian society by establishing hospitals, education systems, libraries and other services throughout the West Bank and Gaza Strip." 4022:

truce. Western sources are the ones messing it up. For example one group firing rockets is actually in conflict with Hamas yet western media sources generally say "affiliated with" and they also don't distinguish between Hamas and Fatah rockets. We have to be careful with so many conflicting reliable sources.

2092:. The discussion could take place with the image in the article as well. IMO it does not really matter that I'm alone and there are two of you because I provided good reasons to keep the image, while you did not. Oh and btw by keeping image out of the article you're making your absolutely unreasonable POV.-- 5459:

90% is 90%, and there are three independent and objective sources attesting to that. As for your theoretically serious example, the Hells Angels did not spend 90% of its revenues on welfare, hospitals, senior centers and schools. If you have an authentically serious example of a group that spends 90%

4146:

escalation . . . occurred earlier." _The_ escalation, among many possible examples, was the invasion of Gaza by Israel. In any case, I'm not choosing one escalation over another, I'm simply saying the conflict 'escalated' when Israel invaded Gaza. That seems uncontroversial and obvious, so there's no

3765:

The nuances of the lull should be in the history section not the introduction. That is one problem I have with massively expanded discussion of the lull. But also, as noted below, there is excessive certainty about what is going on. Apparently I need to remind everyone that we don't actually know who

3505:

Hamas also has been responsible for anti-Israel rocket attacks, IED attacks, and shootings, but reduced most of those operations in 2005 and 2006. Rocket attacks against Israel have continued, although such attacks (whether by Hamas or by other paramilitaries is uncertain) greatly diminished during a

3423:

3355:, we do not use "terrorist" as a descriptor in that manner. Your passage also contained very [[WP:RS|unreliable sources such as rightsidenews.com, and has been reverted. If you want to re-editmaterial according to Knowledge (XXG) policy, then by all means do so. Please do not just wholesale revert 2791:

The fact that Hamas is antisemitic has been widely denied by Hamas leaders and members. Since it is hard to know the groups intentions, it should not be stated that the group is antisemitic. The charter does not call for the murder of jews and actually the translation for the destruction of israel is

2500:

What is absolute rubbish is the fact that "antisemitism" was coined by a Jew-hater to solely refer to hatred of Jews, & has little to do with any actual racial term. The strawman that " can't be antisemitic because they are Semites themselves" is either a display of ignorance or a common trick of

2221:

Of all the things in this article I expected to be controversial, the assertion that Hamas constitutes an "Islamist" organization is not one of them, given the fact that Hamas charters itself as such, quoting directly from Koran and Hadith, and is sworn to the goal of establishing an Islamic state in

1246:

MEMRI, Spectator, National Review, The Daily Telegraph, The Herald Sun, The Australian and the UN Security Council are considered reliable by others, if not by you, and any apparent bias is irrelevant with the current NPOV policies by which we operate. However, unless I’m misreading you, you consider

362:

Hey again. You noted " I'd agree if you just use some of the resources we have at Human shields#Gaza and the West Bank instead as they are well-sourced and verified.", I did use the source from that site... it was that so famed second reference I mentioned. Didn't you look at it? or compare it to the

307:

I'm somewhat offended that you didn't clarify why that ref was also unacceptable. I'm also concerned that now that you've made the revision, you'll be hesitant to accept the other reference I provided, whereas if I'd never used the youtube link, you might have left the passage be. I hope this doesn't

5548:

Is there a _group_ that spends 90% of its revenues on social, non-political concerns that it would not be misleading not to call, in part, "social"? We should, in this encyclopedia, provide a non-misleading, non-POV short description of Hamas. A "social and political group with a paramilitary force"

5474:

Yeah, about that 90% figure... I've taken a look at those three "objective" sources. The first one is an about.com article that references the work of another author (whose "objectivity" is not established anywhere that I can see) that quotes a figure "up to" 90% (which could mean 0%). The second

5024:

Actually, changing numbers to a percentage is not OR (The "No original research" rule does not forbid routine calculations (e.g. adding or subtracting numbers, rounding them, calculating percentages, converting them into similar units, putting them on a graph, or calculating a person's age) that add

3805:

I tried to return the document to my earlier version, but apparently there will have to be war to make the intro section realistic, factual, and relatively brief. Or people will return to reason and tell the detailed story in the history section, where the contentions on both sides can and should be

3713:

I gave my reasons above. The gist of the information isn't the issue, it was the presentation and wording that was, which is why I suggested that the original editor reintroduce it while keeping abreast of Wiki policy, such as words to avoid and reliable sorcing. At the time this AM, it was better

3698:

about part of his deletion. What is "POVish" about having casualty figures for the rockets in the article. The source is the Israeli Foreign Affairs Dept so there is no problem there in regards reliability. The numbers are relevant as a search will show that that is a common question asked on search

2977:

There is disagreement regarding whether Norman Finkelstein, Juan Cole, and/or MEMRI lie and/or mislead. Since there are a lot of non-controversial news sources available on Hamas, we should 'go there' first. The controversial sources are appropriate when describing two or more sides taken in various

2287:

We bring up the charter because it is still their charter. That some single person says they don't use it anymore (except that they so when "it's usefel") is certainly not proof of anything. For example, Arafat swore to the West that he had removed the anti-Jewish parts of the PLO charter - & he

1881:

You do not have to worry about free content. The image was uploaded to commons with a free license. Now it is the image from Commons and not from Flickr. Yes, I do have point of view about hamas. So what? The image and the caption do not express my POV. I did not paint this poster myself. hamas did.

1714:

I'm not familiar enough with Knowledge (XXG) to undertake editing this myself. Perhaps someone else could do so. While they're at it, they might want to check most of the other assertions concerning how many rockets were launched and who launched them. I don't have the figures in front of me, but

1387:

There has been a dispute over whether the European Union designates Hamas a terrorist organization. It was removed based on the supposed point that the Council of the European Union is not the European Union itself. True, but the Council of the European Union is, in fact, a legislative body thereof,

1002:

The Spectator is a magasine. It is published by the same people who produce The Telegraph. It has been described as conservative, even supporting the American neo-conservative trend, and supportive of Israel. Why not cite "The Telegraph," since newspapers are supposed to distinguish between news and

759:

On your other point, are you suggesting that Hamas’ themes of martyrdom somehow validates including information of Israeli tactics in the Hamas article? I researched the “neighbour procedure" and think it’s interesting. However, I disagree with your conclusions about balancing the Hamas article with

692:

Do you really want to go down that road? According to the UN and Red Cross just to name two vocal sources Hamas has never used human shields. Israel on the other hand regularly uses them so will you mention that as well? The IDF call it the "neighbour procedure" and it is as much using human shields

478:

Some presentations, such as framing it under headings like ‘Death industry’, are prone to POV. However, we could place the quote into a section called ‘Themes of martyrdom’, within the ‘Militancy and political violence’ section. The information does contain themes of martyrdom (e.g. ‘We desire death

474:

Interesting perspective Wayne, I didn’t think of that. It could be a POV to present the quote as an ‘admission’. What are we actually seeing? Fathi Hamad said something, and the evidence of it being a reality is not addressed, making it closer to politics than Hamas tactics. We could emphasise that

299:

Hi FayssalF! You recently removed an addition I made to the Hamas site. Perhaps you didn't notice, but I had placed my addition, references and all, in the talk page for over 24 hours. Nobody even commented on it, so I was surprised to see you removed it after posting. Perhaps I'm being unrealistic,

110:

This is a standard anti-Muslim canard employed by Zionist agents and propagandists. In fact, there is no "conspiracy thinking" by Hamas. If one's family and ancestral home were destroyed by uniformed Jewish-Israeli soldiers, then how can noticing that destruction, properly labelling it an aggressive

4902:

Now, given the general behavior of you people on even non-controversial subjects, I give this about a 1 in 100 chance of being implemented. My own opinion is that Knowledge (XXG) sucks, and the editors (you so-called "wikipedians" are the source of all the problems here. My suggestions here are all

4898:

It is a very simple statement. It is an improvement because it is accurate, it is true to the words of the expert without injecting any interpretation and conjecture, and it dates the statement, so that what was being said *in the past* is not being made as a present tense claim by Knowledge (XXG).

4873:

Secondly, this statement is a distortion of the expert opinion it is attempting to reference. The reference given is to a website who is quoting Reuven Paz (out of context). If you Google this line you will see it cut and pasted into a thousand places. I have included the statement in context below

4869:

This is weaselly from several points of view. First, I spent up to 100% of my time and resources editing Knowledge (XXG). I also spend up to 100% of my time sleeping and up to 100% of my time eating. They are all true statements but they give an exaggerated impression. Saying "up to" is the same as

4828:

The PLO angrily suspended its participation in the peace talks in response to the massacre and demanded the removal of the four hundred or so militant from Hebron and the disarming of the rest. Hamas, the Islamic resistance movement that had been bitterly opposed to the peace talks with the Jewish

4821:

Another consequence of the intifada was the birth of Hamas. The name is an Arabic word meaning zeal, and also an acronym for the Islamic Resistance Movement. Hamas was founded in Gaza in 1988 by Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, a paralyzed religious teacher, as a wing of the long-established Muslim Brothers in

4657:

Mashal specifically uses the word "respected," so in a summative section -- which is what the lead section is supposed to be -- it is better to sum up with the word "respectful" than an extended quote. And only an extended quote would allow readers to understand what Mashal was saying. I don't know

4612:

In the introduction to the article it says "On the other hand, other Hamas figures have written respectfully of the Jewish religion, one stating that Hamas's conflict with Israel "is not religious but political." I'd like to change it to "On the other hand, the head of the political bureau of Hamas

4272:

There is a great deal of understandable overlap in these three sections, which are all basically historical. The Hamas Charter is a little tricky, so perhaps part of it (the controversies and disagreements surrounding it) should be moved to issues. Anyway, this is what I'm humbly thinking of doing.

3482:

Note that the following is an accurate and abbreviated _introductory_ comment on the rocket attacks. It is for the _Introduction_ section of the Hamas article. Your contribution, which needs to come after the "November 4th IDF raid" has been explained, and after "the June 19, 2008 lull arrangement"

3056:

I know Jewish organizations and wealthy individuals that have hired people to claim that people like Juan Cole (and the NYT) are unreliable and biased against Israel. They create disagreement. Just because some partisan think tank creates disagreement about Juan Cole (or the NYT), does that mean we

2436:

Actually, it is not false. Article 32 in Hamas charter explicitly says: "...For Zionist scheming has no end, and after Palestine they will covet expansion from the Nile to the Euphrates. Only when they have completed digesting the area on which they will have laid their hand, they will look forward

2053:

By your own response, it's representative of them. If you can find something more fully representative of them, especially one made by them, I would definitely defend its inclusion, too. But I am definitely not convinced this shouldn't stand, since, as is known, they made it themselves. To me, that

1179:

is a very good source for Hamas and the culture of Martyrdom. Hopefully more sources can be found validating MEMRI's translation of the quote that you found so that the section would have flesh. I do firmly believe that Hamas uses the media for propaganda purposes to encourage militant acts against

1110:

along with the heavy mainstream coverage, is sufficient to satisfy ‘usual caution’. According to the discussion of PMW reliability (directly below the MEMRI discussion), it is also an acceptable source, so perhaps it should be added to the quotation for balance. In any case, the pervading wisdom in

503:

A Hamas official has commented on the role of Palestinian civilians in warfare. On February 29, 2008, Fathi Hamad, a member of the Palestinian Legislative Council, stated on Al-Aqsa TV, “For the Palestinian people death became an industry, at which women excel and so do all people on this land: the

204:

I have heard analysis of Hamas suggesting the use of human shields. Does this have grounds for inclusion? Or is it overly subject to issues of balance, undue weight, and impartial tone? Perhaps the very use of the phrase ‘human shield’ instills bias in the reader, and the issue is currently far too

5511:

90% is 90%, and there are three independent and objective sources attesting to that. If you have a serious example of a group that spends 90% of its revenues funding social activities and institutions, but which reasonable people would not describe as, in part, a "social" group, please tell me and

4888:

I submit that this is an inaccurate distortion of the statement being made by the expert being cited. I submit that the citation is a poor reference because it is quoting a website that is quoting the expert out of context. I submit that it can be improved for *accuracy* and not a point of view by

4877:

The statement is that "Approximately 90% of its work is in social, welfare, cultural and educational activities." If this is the statement of the expert being referenced, then this is the information that should be in Knowledge (XXG). Making statements about the *resources* that are being spent is

4844:

Hussein, whose peace treaty with Israel remained as unpopular among his own people as it was popular among Israelis. To obtain the release of the Mossad agents, Netanyahu had to deliver Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, the Hamas spiritual leader who had been languishing in an Israeli prison. ... The fact that

4835:

King Hussein intervened in the dialogue personally to report an offer of a cease-fire from Hamas. He requested that this offer be conveyed directly to the prime minister. Great was his surprise and anger therefore when he learned that Netanyahu himself had ordered the bizarre operation in Jordan's

4676:

We have no problem with Jews who have not attacked us - our problem is with those who came to our land, imposed themselves on us by force, destroyed our society and banished our people. We shall never recognise the right of any power to rob us of our land and deny us our national rights. We shall

4552:

says April 6, 1994: First Hamas car bombing kills eight in Israeli city of Afula. April 13, 1994: First Hamas suicide bombing kills five in Israeli city of Hadera. This issue seems unresolved and needs more attention to determine whether Goldstein's 1994 attack prompted it, exacerbated it, or had

4425:

This article is written in English, so I don't see how changing the phrase 'suicide bombings' into 'Entehari acts (انتحاری)' will make it more understandable. Moreover, because the part of the sentence 'on Israeli civilians' is deleted, it seems that this is a deliberate attempt to deny that these

4292:

There is no good reason for not including the charter in full on Knowledge (XXG). The opinions of Mousa Marzouk in the second paragraph are clearly not encyclopedic material. No-one is preventing Hamas from amending the obvious anti-semitism and rejection of any peace accords from its charter.

4076:

You seem not to understand that a reference to the 'November 4 incident' comes completely out of the blue as the article is presently written. A link to the ceasefire article, even if specified to the dissolution section, doesn't replace helping readers here at the Hamas article understand in some

4021:

Definately too much for the intro. Even a summary in the lead is too much. History is the place but it needs cleaning up from the horrendous mess above. Israel has admitted the Nov 4th incident broke the truce if you ignore the closed borders and that it was not Hamas firing the rockets during the

3931:

I will for awhile, but nothing is pending as far as I can tell. As I've said repeatedly but you've been unresponsive, an extended discussion of the ceasefire, disputed incidents 'ending' the ceasefire (there is no separate wikipedia entry on the Nov 4 incident), and so on, should be in the history

3448:

i) A period of relative quiet between June 19 and November 4 : As of June 19, there was a marked reduction in the extent of attacks on the western Negev population. The lull was sporadically violated by rocket and mortar shell fire, carried out by rogue terrorist organizations, in some instance in

3243:

Can we link MEMRI to falsification? Hmmm ... I think we can. It has been credibly accused by a number of westerners of it. If English-speakers who can spot these problems suffer from this, we're bound to suspect that much worse goes on for people who can't defend themselves, in languages we cannot

2874:

This article is riddled with POV assertions from MEMRI. MEMRI is a controversial source, and the article would be much more neutral if it were not used except when doing a 'compare/contrast' between advocacy journalism/opinion on both sides of certain issues. Similar might be said of ynetnews.com.

1632:

Hamas was elected in a Democracy, however shortly after being elected, Hamas chose to violently overthrow the government which they were elected to, similar to how Hitler and other dictators seized power after being elected. Statements which claim Hamas is a democratically elected government are

1141:

You are right. I did confuse your sources. As an American, I am familiar with the News Corporation, at least with Fox TV. It is notoriously biased against all things Arab and Muslim and towards all things neo-conservative. I have heard that the same is true of of News Corporation itself and Rupert

1059:

policy, which states that a magazine is an acceptable source. Inclusion of material from mainstream news organizations is welcomed according to Knowledge (XXG) policy, and as I’ve established, these are undeniably mainstream. The position that a news provider is not a reliable source because it is

5665:

In my opinion, the CFR, like any thinktank, is a policy advocacy group, insofar as they debate policy issues, reach conclusions, and advocate those conclusions as policy positions. That doesn't necessarily mean they are pro-anyone, but it does put their neutrality as a source for information on

5425:

Hospitals, schools, senior citizen centers and so on are social and not political institutions created by Hamas. This is non-controversial, and there are three sources stating 90% of Hamas activity is social and not political. It is therefore just plain inaccurate to describe Hamas as a political

3962:

2) Two sentences replacing one is not an extended discussion. It replaces the incorrect sentence that mentions and hyperlinks the ceasefire. The correction deals with the same material of rocket attacks and the ceasefire. However, now the information presented is now correct. You approved of a

3463:

During the June 19, 2008 lull arrangement between Hamas and Israel, Hamas committed itself to to enforce the lull arrangement on the other Palestinian terrorist organizations . While Hamas was careful to maintain the ceasefire up to the November 4th IDF raid, the lull was sporadically violated by

3412:

3334:

3012:

reliable as the New York Times. He covers the middle east in much more detail than the NYT, and in many cases Juan Cole is all you've got. The NYT essentially summarizes people like Juan Cole. I agree that, among some people, the NYT would have more credibility than Juan Cole, but the converse is

2950:

I find myself continually confused. How hard is it to point out who lies & who doesn't? I can point to things - for the example given, Juan Cole - has said that are definitely untrue. Has anyone been able to prove that Memri is a "propaganda outlet", or that they've even lied? I feel like I'm

2927:

As I said, we have sources generally considered unbiased, or at least much less biased, than MEMRI or Norman Finkelstein. Neither should have the only say on anything in particular. So, such sources can be used, imho, as 'compare/contrast two sides of a controversy' sources. In the same way Hamas

2737:

No, it's an opinion piece by a respected Israeli scholar. I used him directly and clarified that this is an opinion; it is a widely shared one, by the way. It is impossible to get the original Israeli intelligence sources on this matter, so an opinion by a respected historian/scholar is where the

2582:

Their grasp of Zionism include some giant Zionist plot against the people of the world and what they consider proper values and this plot include a number of Jewish organizations. Maybe they have nothing against the Jewish religion, just something against any Jewish organization, amongst them the

1998:

Simple, really; Shalit's kidnapping is not a defining event in the history of Hamas. It is one act in a long string of such activities spanning the years. An image accompanying the history of an organization should be something that accompanies and complements the subject matter, and this simply

805:

I’m offended by your statement that “This is an encyclopedia (sic) not a propaganda paper.” implying that what I’m saying is just propaganda. I have been working very hard to ensure that my entries are balanced, putting my amendments to editors over and over, and doing my best to describe exactly

4628:

Why not write, "On the other hand, the head of the Hamas political bureau in (year) wrote respectfully of the Jewish religion and stated that the group's conflict with Israel "is not religious but political." The reason I say this is that the "On the other hand" speaks directly to the charges of

4227:

As written, my abbreviated rendition, in the lead section, is completely and uncontroversially accurate. Yours, which attempts to explain the full story in the lead section, leaves out the Israeli explanation for why they attacked and killed the 6 Hamas fighters. Also, you leave out a transition

4091:

I have understood your point here for the last few comments and have commented on it amicably. You, on the other hand, have made a series of misunderstandings on the two sentences. In the spirit of good faith, what edits do you propose to both maintain the important information I added that is

2268:

Why does everyone bring up the Charter as if it's some important document like the Constitution or something. Marshaal in an interview stated that while it is at times politically useful it is not enforced and is not Hamas policy. Do we still say that because the west once believed in slavery we

1710:

The article contains inaccuracies. In its discussion of the background to the current Israeli attack, it contains a series of increasingly exaggerated assertions of how many rockets were fired from Gaza, culminating in the claim that these 'spiked at two hundred a day, according to the Israeli

5249:

Also, statement like that, even if true, does not prove that Hamas (or Yassin for that matter) is not antisemitic. You can be a racist and dislike black people, but if you see a black baby in a car crash you still won't let her die. That story should go in an article on Yassin, not on Hamas.

5159:

If the claim were not a joke it might make sense to include the information despite the lack of a reliable source. If he stood for one thing it was that he supported and enabled the murders of Israeli civilians in the name of Islam. A story that he went out of his way to save an Israeli citizen

5140:

MEMRI isn't RS either, but they are used when they provide a point of view that is not available from RS, and then we label in the text what the source is. The entry you deleted was written as opinion not fact, and stated the source directly. In a section on "Accusations of anti-semitism," this

4092:

missing from the article (and previously unknown to various posters) that would satisfy your concerns? Seeing how concepts like Hamas vis-a-vis rocket attacks and ceasefire were important, these should remain, in a new, factually correct manner. I would agree that the content (as mentioned by

2414:

Isn't this rather weak (to the point of being patently false)? "Reflect the influence" is a rather odd way of stating the fact that the Hamas charter explicitly quotes a known antisemitic forgery (Protocols of the Elders of Zion), and that Hamas has actively refused to remove this reference.

1320:

We’ve talked in length about MEMRI’s issues, and how it is nevertheless considered reliable as per the noticeboard links. If they were the only group from the region reporting the quote I’d be sceptical, but they’re not, PMW has accepted it too. PMW is considered more reliable than MEMRI in the

4377:"Renowned for its Entehari acts (انتحاری) and other attacks on Israeli security forces, Hamas also runs extensive social programs and has gained popularity in Palestinian society by establishing hospitals, education systems, libraries and other services throughout the West Bank and Gaza Strip." 2251:

That is a criteria you have set; it is not any sort of logical or reasonable minimum criteria for an organization being describable as Islamist or being described as such. All that is relevant is that it is an explicit goal of the organization, which it is, as documented by reliable sources.

1170:, and the afore-linked Brian Whitaker. Juan Cole is a professor of Middle East History at the University of Michigan. William Rugh was a US ambassador to Yemen. These two have much to lose by launching false accusations against an organisation such as MEMRI. I would think the same of Whitaker. 271:

For the Palestinian people death became an industry, at which women excel and so do all people on this land: the elderly excel, the Jihad fighters excel, and the children excel. Accordingly (Palestinians) created a human shield of women, children, the elderly and the Jihad fighters against the

5377:

Hospitals, schools, senior citizen centers and so on are social and not political institutions created by Hamas. This is non-controversial, and there are three sources stating 90% of Hamas activity is social and not political. You're being extraordinarily misleading if you describe Hamas as a

4884:

Furthermore, the actual statement goes on to say about how Hamas preaches abstention from violence against Fatah. I think that actually shows how dated it is, given the developments of the last few years. They are certainly not so peaceful towards Fatah at this point in time (and vice versa).

1174:

have also caught MEMRI translating errors. I stand by my assertion that MEMRI is not a reliable translation source, regardless of what Nickhh might say. I would certainly want more than one other reliable source backing up any translation offered by MEMRI. By the way, one of the articles from

195:

It is little known, and perhaps surprising, to learn that Israel initially supported and may have even assisted in funding Hamas. During the occupation, before the establishment of the Palestinian Authority, Israel correctly reasoned that Gazans would be better served and received by Islamic

5680:

There can't be a more mainstream U.S. policy group than CFR. I don't know what policies, in particular CFR 'advocates' for. I've never heard the group, as a group, advocating for anything in particular. They host discussions and advocacy by individuals affiliated with them. They seem to be a

4110:

I have made the changes that I think make sense. I have left your material in but moved it to the history section. In the intro I simply mention a ceasefire and don't go into the particulars of how strong it was, who did or didn't violate it, and when and how it ended. I'm not rejecting your

5627:

Okay, taking another look there, maybe I didn't make my objections as explicit as I should. The reason why I don't like the CFR as an RS is because I don't in general see advocacy groups as reliable research sources, except when researching that advocacy group's basic information itself. —

2538:

So, maybe we should change the term from Antisemetic to Anti-Jewish. Its clear from the wiki article so far that although there certainly is hatred for the Zionists, there is also clearly a hatred for all Jews as well, as expressed directly is their Mission Statement, which can be viewed at

1358:

I just removed two claims from that section as they are not Hamas actions. Some editors seem to think that anything "bad" a Palestinian/Arab does is equivalent to Hamas doing it and should go on their page and thats a big problem. Editors need to make sure the source at least accuses Hamas.

4273:

Are there any comments or suggestions? I realize there already is a Hamas history article, but I don't intend to shorten or abbreviate anything we have (somebody else can do that controversial job, if they dare), just remove repetition and re-arrange what's left over in chronological order.

1084:

These facts are largely irrelevant, as inclusion of these media sources was primarily required to demonstrate that the quote was notable and mainstream. They are meant to show this is not a fringe issue, which they do successfully. With that secured, the core material is the quote, printed

3240:

MEMRI may be "controversial" and biased, (it's run by ex-members of Israel's military establishment, after all), but then most sources are "biased" to one degree or another - that's not what entitles us to declare such sources non-RS. Can we link MEMRI to hatred? I've not seen evidence of

504:

elderly excel, the Jihad fighters excel, and the children excel. Accordingly (Palestinians) created a human shield of women, children, the elderly and the Jihad fighters against the Zionist bombing machine, as if they were saying to the Zionist enemy: ‘We desire death as you desire Life’."

3483:

has been explained, should be in the history section. The statement "such attacks" refers to all rocket attacks after 2006, and not just to those conducted during the 5-month ceasefire. Note, also, that the ceasefire is stated more simply, and doesn't say it is 'between' Israel and Hamas.

5117:

By his own admission, and this is something that he was proud of, Yassin spent his life enabling and encouraging the murder of Israeli civilians. Thus this claim that he went out of his way to help an Israeli is preposterous. Oh, and also, it isn't supported by reliable sources. Neither

5444:

do charity work, too. I would nonetheless not describe them as a social organization. I think that whatever "social activities" Hamas engages in should not be given dominant weight in the lead relative to the anti-social activities the organization is internationally infamous for. —

865:

would ordinarily have pro-Palestinian bias, though, so the fact that it has come out with an article connecting Hamas to a culture of death is interesting. At the end of it all, though, I really would like to see some more mainstream sourcing for your proposed addition to the article.

220:

Perhaps, in this existing education section, editors could write a section of Saraa Barhoum too. This could include some critical academic analysis of martyrdom themes therein, and how it relates to the martyrdom themes (e.g. ‘We desire death...’) included in the Fathi Hamad address.

4577:

I think that it should be at least mentioned as a controversy or a possibility due to the overwhelming evidence. I am currently trying to find a reference in the news agencies' archives to verify this claim by comparing Hamas's official statements before and after the Goldstein 1994

4447:

I think we don't have permission to talk about goals of Hamas suicide bombings and must survey what did tell Hamas about its goals of these suicide bombings, but we can compare death tolls of both and if we have been unprejudiced, we deduce that Israel government is more guilty than

1064:

would be similarly inadmissible, due to said newspapers Left political stance. An example: “Excluding the Guardian for facts because of its liberal/social democratic editorial line would be like excluding Canada's National Post because of its conservative/neo-conservative editorial

3842:

The problem is that if you leave your edit in, then in order to understand what you are saying you have to add explanation as to what the "June 19 arrangement" is (and it wasn't between Hamas and Israel) and what the "November 4" incident was. So your addition necessitates further

3766:

is shooting the rockets into Israel both during and 'after' the lull. Statements by Hamas are not certain knowledge, and that uncertainty should be acknowledged, very briefly, in the INTRO section of the Hamas article. That's what I did, in the passage as it was a couple days ago:

334:(biased sources). They are both policies and not just guidelines. I appreciate the fact that you had used the talk page before inserting the section but the fact that no one has commented doesn't mean that people agree. I'd agree if you just use some of the resources we have at 4487:

Let us not forget that it is not the death toll of Palestinians versus Israeli's that makes a war proportional. It must be kept in mind that the readers know the risk and potential danger involved. Such as the rockets that are sent over that do not kill, but are intended to.

4228:

between the final and previous sentence of your entry. I continue to ask, why do you insist on putting the full, complex story in the _lead_ section of the Hamas entry? The full, complex story is for the history section, right? Will you ever respond to these sorts of questions?

2310:

These sections are generally frowned upon at Knowledge (XXG) as by their nature they are a negative POV on the subject at hand. I will try to integrate them into the main text, eliminating the phenomenal amount of repetitious content. Well, anyway, it's a big job and will take

4889:

replacing the interpretation of the expert's statement with his statement (which is equally simple, no interpretation is necessary), and by removing the old citation and replacing it with the citation that refers to the speech, the date, and the full context of the statement.

1106:

section in the reliable sources noticeboard. The final position from the remaining MEMRI critic, Nickhh, regarding admissibility of MEMRI translations is: “it is OK to cite them subject to the usual caution, and so long as there is clear attribution.” I would say that the PMW

768:

article is more fitting. That article details Israeli human rights violations in this area, which is one of the reasons I added it to the ‘see also’ link, and it could benefit from inclusion of the ‘neighbour procedure’. Best of luck, and you might find these refs useful:

2630:

Maybe '...split the PLO...' isn't precise, but can this be used as support? The book, _Road to Martyrs Square_ by Anne Marie Oliver and Paul Steinberg, 2005, Oxford University Press, pgs 28-29, which talk about events leading up to the 1987 adoption of the Hamas moniker

2437:

to more expansion, etc. Their scheme has been laid out in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, and their present is the best proof of what is said there. Leaving the circle of conflict with Israel is a major act of treason and it will bring curse on its perpetrators."

2477:

Absolute rubbish. How can Hamas be anti-Semitic if they're Semites themselves? Typical Zionist-media pushed propoganda. Hatred for the 'Zionists' and hatred for all Semitic people are two completely different things. The latter of which wouldn't make any sense at all.

4463:

We do, and we are. This article will tell the WHOLE truth, in as non-biased a fashion as possible. The term "more guilty" does NOT fit that goal. Also, at least TRY to mask your affiliation when talking about making edits to article tone and masking facts you deny.

5403:

at all, much less the first sentence. Please don't be ridiculous. I agree that "social" has a bit of a milk n cookies feel to it though, and have removed that. "Militant" would be fine as well, but I didn't see an immediate way to work it back in grammatically.

1862:

That's what I was getting at, yea. Another angle is that it is apparently a photograph of a political poster, and regardless of it being hosted on the Commons, coming from someone flickr account and all that, I'm not sure how that jibes with the Knowledge (XXG)'s

5349:"social and political organization organization which includes a paramilitary force, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades" is fine. 90% of its activities are non-political and non-military according to three objective sources, so the word "social" has to be included. 3827:

If there is a correction to be made for with two sentences, you can hardly call that "massively expanded." Two sentences replaced one. You can already see above there is contention that there isn't enough citations, now you are claiming that there is too many.

4147:

factual conflict here. You simply are not putting the detailed story into the appropriate place, the history section. You've never acknowledged or argued with that particular point, which I've made from the start, in the title of this little discussion section.

1999:

does not. Put it in Shalit's article, put it in an article about political or ideologically-motivated kidnapping, or something along those lines. Juxtaposing the entire history of Hamas with a propaganda poster of one kidnapped soldier simply doesn't cut it,

4061:

Clearly, I would like to expand on this topic some, but the introduction is not the place for it. I am already criticized for two sentences as a "massively expanded discussion." Clearly more work needs to be done on this issue, and it should go in the body

5296:(in the intro). Sounds more like a tea-party 'mother's club', than a militant group aimed at destroying the inhabitants of the State of Israel, and replacing it with a Palestinian state. "Social" - Some editors here have taken POV to a whole new level. . .-- 5181:

He was the leader of Hamas. The section is about Hamas's alleged anti-semitism. I think I'll move it to the section on statements by Hamas leaders and clerics. Add a statement by Yassin that demonstrates your assessment of him, and put that in that quotes

4077:

general sense what the November 4 incident was and what it meant. You obviously do need to expand. You also can't write that an agreement "_between_" Hamas and Israel began the ceasefire. That's one reason I left that out and made a more general statement.

2895:

The reason for using MEMRI and Ynet is that many people believe them, and they are the source of many claims. The best way to deal with false information is to state it and refute it with true information. We should state their false claims and refute

2288:

never did. And that the West once supported slavery has been openly atoned for & visibly changed in the laws of countries that no longer support it. If it were truly the same thing, by your own logic we must continue to bring up the Hamas charter.

4803:

I have been GoogleBooking lately, which explains my absence from real discussion (sorry). While I had my e-nose in the e-books, I came upon some passages in "Iron Wall" that sounded like they might be useful for this article. I am pasting them below.

2613:

This is too far-fetched. A reporter that heard it first hand can report it but I'm afraid that until CIA (and other organizations) archives will be open to the public, many years from now, we won't really know if there's truth in the matter or not.

435:

You need to keep in mind that there has never been a proven instance of Hamas using human shields. A recent claim of such was the bombing of a school that Hamas was using to fire missiles from. The proof was a picture of mortars fired from a street

2461:

The user from IP 78.1.144.121 did not grasp the point of the first poster. I believe the correct syntax should be "and some of its public statements are influenced by antisemitic conspiracy theories". A reference to article 32 is indeed warranted.

3699:

websites. It is one of the only conflicts that doesn't have casualty figures. It also puts the attacks in perspective as a reader seeing 10,000+ attacks tends to assume casualties in the hundreds if not thousands. It seems POV not to include it.

2516:

What drivel from a pro-Zionist. What blank statements! Ignorance my bumcheek. Please don't insult my intelligence you racist. So you've given a name. So what? Those who oppose Zionism aren't anti-Jew no matter how much rubbish you come up with.

5104:

When asked about relations with Israelis on a personal level, Dr. Atef Ibrahim Adwan, professor of Political Science in the Islamic University of Gaza and biographer of Hamas leader Sheikh Ahmad Yassin, relates the following incident involving

4127:

This is not correct. The escalation, as mentioned above, occurred earlier. I was looking forward to our discusion of this and our eventual compromise. i was dissapointed to see another change with a factual error from something with so much

4322:

I think we must glimpse these statistics (death tolls of Hamas suicide bombings on Israeli civilians and death tolls of Israel attacks on Palestinian civilians), then talk over Hams notorious for its numerous suicide bombings on Palestinian

4111:

contribution, just trying to reduce the introduction section to a more reasonable size. Also note that I moved all history information in the intro/lead to a two paragraphs after the lead, rather than having it in two widely separated areas.

1268:

Fox News serves as an excellent case study about how an allegedly bias news body is still considered a reliable source. For the most part, the primary reasons I’ve found regarding it’s exclusion relate more to disliking it than NPOV policy:

4940:

Fixed it for you. I provided a recent RS for resource percentage so "up to" now applies and the sentence is no longer "OR". Please refrain from personal attacks. While some editors are problem in regards to POV most are doing their best.

1951:

value judgment placed on what it said, other than quantitative - which is not a value, POV-wise. Now, if it truly is not a copyright free image, that's one thing. But it was made BY Hamas, to tell us about themselves. I must repeat, I am

1509:

Hamas is not currently part of a democratically elected government. Hamas violently overthrew the democratically elected goverment which they participated in. The Hamas dictatorship of the Gaza strip has no constitutional legitimacy.

4681:

How about ""On the other hand, the head of the political bureau of Hamas stated that their conflict with Israel "is not religious but political", and that the Jews have a covenant from God " that is to be respected and protected".

1300:

You definitely seem to have a point about the newspapers/e-papers. I am not entirley certain, though, that MEMRI can be consdiered a verifiable source for translations because of the fact that others have found errors in their work.

1060:

described as being closer to one political stance than another is a POV. In other words, deleting issues covered by Spectator because the magazine is conservative is a POV. By that same logic, MEMRI criticism from newspapers such as

4903:

in line with what you are supposed to do, and it is all backed up. If any of you have the courage to actually act as you are supposed to, this will get folded in post haste, but again, that would shock me right out of my chair.

5363:

I'm interested to see which "objective" sources refute the info explicitly stated within the Hamas charter (i.e. Destroying Israel), and do not hold Hamas responsible as a "social organization" for murdering Israeli civilians.

1806:

I changed it to a link rather than the actual image. As to the image itself, what relevance or context does it provide, Shalit barely warrants a few lines in the litany of Hamas' history. On his own page, sure, but here and

4426:

suicide bombings were almost solely targetting civilians. Such a manipulated description of the actual events, which are supported by abundant factual evidence, cannot even be considered as 'biased', as it is clearly a lie.

3013:

also true; I don't see how it follows that we should avoid Juan Cole. If we have a statement sourced to Juan Cole, and somebody finds a statement that confirms it (or challenges it) from the NYT, or MEMRI, they should add it.

398:

I know you used a source apart from the Youtube video. In fact, there are many third party sources that are unbiased wich represent neither side of the conflict. There is a big difference about the reporting of -say- the BBC

4845:

Israel was forced to release Yassin increased his prestige and that of the organization he had founded. Thus, by his unremitting concentration on Hamas, Netanyahu ended up by raising it to a position of pivotal importance.

3034:

You seem to be saying that we should eliminate controversial sources. Who should we use? The NYT? The NYT's own ombudsman said that people on both sides accuse the NYT of bias on Israel-Palestine. How about the Jerusalem

1896:

I really do not see how a picture you or someone took of a political poster qualifies as "free", despite however it may be tagged over at the Commons, it seems a bit suspect. Regardless, your free admission of violating

2659:

In the text you quoted there's "the Israelis were reported" and "There were even rumors". The rumors are obviously something we can't rely on. The reports is something that need to cited directly, this text alone is not

2252:

Removing that descriptor is improper, but since their Islamist nature is described both in their infobox and in detail in the discussion of their charter, it's also an ineffective attempt at whitewashing in any event. —

1736:

The EU's foreign aid chief Louis Michel said during his visit to Gaza: "Hamas is acting in the way of a terrorist movement" ( Does it reflect the position of European Union or is it once again somebody's personal view?

5057:

heading, the last sentence is "a very beatiful country" I think there is no controversy over the beauty of the country but (apart from the spelling error) i'm not sure it's relevant to the Guerrilla warfare issue.

1278:

certain kinds of information, that alone isn't enough by itself for something to be deleted. This may be coupled with (or replaced by) the unexplained claim that they feel that the information is ‘unencyclopedic’.

4914:

Reuven Paz, PhD, Senior Research fellow at The International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism (ICT) in Herziliya, Israel, said in a July 20, 2001 speech titled "Islamic Palestine or Liberated Palestine?":

2177:

subjectively— the picture is consisted of two elements; communication/propaganda and a subject which is the captured soldier is this case). In brief, my view then concurs with that of Tarc when he talks about

2160:

is' and that's your argument for your point view. Other views say that 'they are known of many things' and caprturing foreign soldiers is certainly not their main activity and if you want that image being used

922:

To summarize: The translation is accurate according to three separate groups, the issue has been well reported by multiple mainstream global news bodies, and the addition is conservatively worded and balanced.

5526:

Whether it's 90% of their activity is irrelevant. Barack Obama spends atleast 50% of his time eating, sleeping, and going to the bathroom. Should we announce that in the lede. No, because it's not his notable

303:

In any case, I suspected that the Youtube link my have been considered lackluster to some editors for such a controversial issue. That is why I added an additional link to a newspaper reporting on the speech.

5009:

My bad. I guess it was OR on my part as the source gave Hamas's income and expenditure in $ and my calculations gave the 95% figure. I figured a percentage was more encyclopedic (and shorter) than using $ .

242:

I have a suggestion for a new subsection in ‘Militancy and political violence’. Please expand, reduce, and question what I’ve written, with particular emphasis on NPOV, balance, use of words and impartiality:

308:

offend you or seem impolite, but from my perspective of your edit summary, it looks like you didn't consider the other reference and chose to delete all my work rather than amend to remove the youtube link.

2643:

Would this support the claim that Hamas may have originally been supported by Israel to undermine the PLO if we can find documentation from the PLO/Fatah and Hamas of their accusations against each other?

1204:(removed indent) Hi PinkWorld, I’m ready to continue our dialogue on reliability. You say that these sources are unreliable because of their alleged conservative bias. I have collected some quotes on that: 1882:

This poster is about hamas in its own words. There are very few images in the article. I really see no problem in the image being there. IMO all reasons for removing the image from the article are bogus.--

1254:

In response to your concerns about Fox News, which is not even a source here and is only partially connected with the parent company of another source in a different country, Editor Protonk contributes:

5642:

I eliminated the third source, didn't find anything about percentages in it. The other two sources are RS, in my opinion. CFR is not an advocacy group, by the way. You can read about Robin Wright here:

3770:

Rocket attacks against Israel have continued, although such attacks (whether by Hamas or by other paramilitaries is uncertain) greatly diminished during a 5-month long ceasefire that ended in late 2008.

5460:

of its revenues funding social activities and institutions, but which reasonable people would not describe as, in part, a "social" group, please tell me and I'll reconsider my position on this matter.

2978:

controversies. On important matters both sources should be heard when another substantive but not across-the-board accepted source has an opinion directly opposed to that of 'Finkelstein/Cole/MEMRI'.

5426:

organization with a paramilitary wing. This is a bogus controversy; "social" simply doesn't imply "a tea-party 'mother's club'," it implies social, while "paramilitary wing" implies what it implies.

4724:

Does anyone know what happened to the passage I wrote quoting the BBC interview with Sir Jeremy Greenstock? It appears to have been deleted, but it is an important voice to add to this article.

1218:

This is the reason the Neutral Point of View policy exists. News providers have a POV, but we report what they report from a neutral perspective, not exclude them. Editor Blueboar contributes:

115:

The fact would have to be proven that it was destroyed wantonly and not because it was being used as a military station, as is common practice for terrorists. So, no "war crime" can be proven.

1379:

Can somebody change the pronunciation in the main article from Ḥarakat al-Muqāwamat to Ḥarakat al-Muqāwamah (you can check that it should be like that in French, Spanish and other versions)

5567:

I agree, Tarc. For what it's worth, "political/militant" (or "paramilitary" as a substitute for the latter) are two sufficiently uncontroversial descriptors for the lead paragraph, IMO. —

2890:

I don't think you mean "controversial," I think you mean "biased, subjective and often wrong." As I understand it, MEMRI is basically a free-lance channel for Israeli government propaganda.

4643:

The word I object to is "respectfully", since it is POV. Maybe we can use a larger quote so that the tone of the text is better understood and the reader can reach their own conclusion? -

4338:

There are no comparable statistics, since Israel does not attack citizens. It attacks terrorists, who hide behind citizens. I am disappointed that i even have to spell this out to anyone.

727:

If you insist on adding that quote, which can be taken out of context, then I suggest you include this recent one which is far more relevant and from a more notable source, Hamas founder

4906:

PS. I realized I didn't sign this. And no I am not going to register for an account because it's a waste of time, as this post will soon prove. More useful to go piss against the wind.

4840:

By ordering the operation in Amman, Netanyahu showed himself to be feckless, irresponsible, and staggeringly shortsighted. The consequences were very grave. The operation weakened King

5666:

groups related to issues they advocate policy on into question. I understand that this is a tricky issue, and if consensus is that they qualify as a reliable source here, so be it. —

264:

A Hamas official has commented on the use of Palestinian civilians in warfare. On February 29, 2008, Fathi Hamad, a member of the Palestinian Legislative Council, stated on Al-Aqsa TV,

3640: 2088:

OK, I guess until good reason is given to keep the image out of the article it should be in the article. IMO it is you not me, who are violating WP:ILIKEIT, except in your case it is

5697:

Hiddekel, then you don't agree with the idea that people should examine as many different viewpoints as possible, including advocates of all kinds, and come to their own conclusions

1275: 5623:

None of the three sources are from the Los Angeles Times--though the third is an Associated Press article which, as I stated above, does not seem to mention that statistic at all.

4881:

Lastly, this statement was made in 2001. George W. Bush was president in 2001. We don't look up President of the United States and see the statement that he is president currently.

798:, which is a similar reason (contradictory evidence) we reduced Hamad’s quote from the loaded ‘Human shields’ to the accurate ‘Themes of martyrdom’. You could try placing it in the 3917:

Please refrain. There is an unresolved issue above that is still pending. This information is important and clearly informative. Editors on this subject seem to be unaware of it.

1825:

This image is not only about Shalit. This image is mostly about hamas, made by hamas itself, tells alot what hamas really is. That's why I believe the image should stay here.--

1260: 1224: 1103: 4508:

I think it should be noted that Hamas's suicide bombing campaign started as a retaliation to the Cave of the Patriarchs massacre which was perpetrated on February 25, 1994.

3107:

FlaviaR, you ask, "How hard is it to point out who lies & who doesn't?" People have been trying to do that since the dawn of the human race, and probably before. Read

5493:

That a group may perform social functions or activities does not automatically make it a "social organization". But the "terrorist" label does not go there either, per

3731:

I'm not interested in this other excerpt, I'm only interested in the one I'm citing. If I accidentally reverted something unassociated with , then it was unintentional.

178:

I beg to differ: it references anti-Semtiic forgeries. The "Protocols" have absolutely nothing to do with Zionism, except that Zionism is part of Judaism as a religion.

3086:. Mill says that you don't get the truth by finding the one truthful source. The only way to get the truth is to read all sides of the controversy and decide yourself.) 3857:

Hyperlink to the relevant wikipedia article. The previous and incorrect passage made a reference to the ceasefire and made use of a hyperlink to address this issue.

1237:

The threshold for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) is verifiability, not truth—that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Knowledge (XXG) already

5549:

does that. It is plainly silly and absurd to erase "social" for a group 90% of whose activity is social. There are more important things to be doing and discussing.

5212:

article. I would also encourage you not to replace the unsourced story. Your continuous reinsertion of the unsourced content can be seen as edit-warring. Thanks, --

4760:

that the Hamas charter was "drawn up by a Hamas linked imam some years ago and has never been adopted since Hamas was elected as the Palistian government in 2006".

4613:

stated that their conflict with Israel "is not religious but political." Seeing as how saying that other hamas figures have written respectfully violates WP:SYN. -

3383:. I'm going to take out the "terrorist," cite the PDF directly, and make sure to fix the patently incorrect portion you reverted to containing inaccuracies like 2501:

Jew-haters to try to delegitimize the term. Since I absolutely do not want to accuse anyone of Jew-hatred, I suggest anyone who doubts me to look up Wilhelm Marr.

152:

Hamas's founding charter makes reference to anti-zionist propaganda documents that have been proven forgeries. But I guess that was all the work of Zionist Agents.

954: 897: 2814:

Has everyone seen this? Good piece. I think this will settle the question. Unfortunately subscription-based, but some WSJ articles are posted to free web sites.

2875:

Why not simply use the enormous amount of information available from BBC, CNN, Reuters, TimesOnline, Guardian, WaPost, and NYTimes (and, in a pinch, Haaretz)?

1551:

has designated..." This ground has been well-trodden in the past, so I suggest the naysayers spend a little time in this page's archives to get a refresher.

4199:

was erroneous. After all of this discussion over two sentences. Where it was directly replied to and mentioned five times, you make an erroneous reversion.

5329:

Therin lies your problem. What was "back in the day" is often no longer true "in this day". The page must evolve to take into consideration current events.

4672:

I understand your point, but I would say that some parts of the article aren't really respectful, which is why we should be careful not to label it as such:

5118:

IslamonLine.net nor Dr. Atef Ibrahim Adwan, professor of Political Science in the Islamic University of Gaza, nor a combination of the two are reliable. --

5440:

So does that make Hamas a social organization with a paramilitary/terrorist wing, or a paramilitary/terrorist network with a social wing? After all, the

4983:

Now I see, there were actually three sources in that one footnote. One of them, from 2008, uses the "up to 90%" figure. So I changed to the latest number.

4629:

anti-semitism. For the sake of balance, that 'incendiary' charge should not simply be left dangling when some important members of Hamas have answered it.

3455: 3380: 4172:, Hamas committed itself to to enforce the lull arrangement on the other Palestinian organizations . While Hamas was careful to maintain the ceasefire 3784:, Hamas committed itself to to enforce the lull arrangement on the other Palestinian organizations . While Hamas was careful to maintain the ceasefire 1411:

Do you have a better source from the EU themselves? I'm sure they maintain a better list than the funding document that's flouted here all the time...

5745:. There are plenty of advocacy Wikis out there. This isn't one, but by the tone this article is starting to take, one begins to think otherwise... — 4895:"As of 2001, it has been claimed that approximately 90% of the work engaged in by Hamas was in social, welfare, cultural and educational activities." 4866:

This article states that "Hamas devotes up to 90% of Hamas's work and resources are spent on social, welfare, cultural, and educational activities."

1180:

Israel. I just want leek-proof sourcing. I also think that Hamas has done good things for Palestinian society (see charitable works in the article).

2909:

that MEMRI is so unreliable that it shouldn't be used in WP, without using the same kind of subjective judgments that people use against Juan Cole?

4783:

This is a good contribution but I may move it, for the sake of lessening repetition and putting everything on a certain subject in the same place.

4677:

never recognise the legitimacy of a Zionist state created on our soil in order to atone for somebody else's sins or solve somebody else's problem.

1213:

have biases (in other words, all editors and all sources have a point of view) — what matters is how we combine them to create a neutral article.

372:

BTW, thanks for telling me about the quote framing thing. I guess I'll have to try and rephrase it. Or I could copy paste the relevant info from

1666:

I agree. I've deleted the following, for example, since it fails to match Wiki's policy of NPOV, but much more work is needed on this article:

3657: 2666:"In the late 1980s, Israel had supported the nascent Hamas in order to weaken Fatah, the secular nationalist movement led by Yasser Arafat." 782:

words are “far more relevant” than the Fathi Hamad’s in relation to themes of martyrdom. That quote seems to relate to his perceptions of the

4191:

Now, after this you refer to the same November 4th incident 5 times. Five times. A post you reply to even points out the link excerpt where

2901:

In addition, it's impossible to figure out a way to decide by consensus that MEMRI is unreliable and other sources, like Juan Cole, are not.

2440:

Therefore, it is obvious that Hamas article is inspired by the Protocols, ipso facto, the above claim (reflects the influence...) is RIGHT.

1772: 1655: 786:, not martyrdom. Regarding your source, I’ve only found one reference in The National from Abu Dhabi, which would actually make that quote a 4955:

I checked the sources but can't seem to find where it says that up to 95% is spent in this? Would you mind quoting that part here? thanks, -

2524: 2485: 1722: 1681: 1247:

PMW reliable. As it has published the quote, that would mean “that (the) material added to Knowledge (XXG) already has been published by a

4318:

A comparison between death tolls of Hamas suicide bombings on Israeli civilians and death tolls of Israel attacks on Palestinian civilians

3898:

I agree that you have a point. I'll try to revise in a way that keeps the November 4 violation out and the 'June arrangement between' out.

208:

As an alternative, the ‘Provision of social welfare and education’ section could be supplemented with the addition of a direct quote from

1085:

unchallenged by multiple sources. These sources are independent, sitting on different sides of the debate, with all supporting the quote.

4925: 4433: 4300: 4050:^ Hamas: Continued rocket fire by Fatah armed group harms Palestinian interests Haaretz. Avi Isacharoff and Yuval Azoulay. June 29, 2008 2564: 2544: 1616: 5760:

BTW, I will add a source from an Israel-affiliated specialist who puts Hamas's non-political work at 80 to 85%. Busy right now, though.

2799: 2711:

Historian or reporter, this is a news report on a news paper. If this report cite reliable source then those should be used directly.

2447: 2422: 2410:"However, its founding charter, writings, and many of its public statements reflect the influence of antisemitic conspiracy theories." 1517: 137: 2195:

Whatever point of view you may have you need to explain what you really mean by the picture 'telling us a lot what hamas really'. --

1227:(and conversely a biased source can be reliable). The important thing is that we should not be biased in our articles (see WP:NPOV). 331: 3226:

I can think of many oil states and Christian organizations that have hired people to that are unreliable and biased against Israel.

913:, which you yourself say has a pro-Palestinian bias, and could be interpreted as a third independent validation of the translation. 5534: 5219: 5167: 5125: 4197:"After the end of a 5-month ceasefire, the conflict escalated with Israel’s invasion of Hamas-ruled Gaza in late December, 2008." 4037:

For example one group firing rockets is actually in conflict with Hamas yet western media sources generally say "affiliated with"

3777:

None of the above is a contention by an interested party, all of it is widely acknowledged as true. But here's where we are now:

2928:

officials and Israeli officials are sources, but we wouldn't want one or the other to have the only word on anything contentious.

2463: 656:. I'm going to make that addition again, after selecting two of what I think are the strongest refs. At the moment, I'm thinking 3975: 2345: 5025:

no new information to what is already present in the cited sources.) However, I still can't find where that figure came from. -

4041:

Have you looked at the sources I put into that incredibly condensed two sentences? You would note that your point is covered:

2682:

This is again a news report. A news reporter can rely on sources without exposing them, here you have to cite reliable sources.

1031: 894: 3439:

2. The lull arrangement was based on unwritten understandings and called for the cessation of the fighting in the Gaza Strip.

1472:

but states that, in "view to combating terrorism" that certain people are subject to restrictive measures. The EU is usually

900: 610: 475:

Hamad was testifying nothing more than a value of Hamas, in contrast to portraying their words as an admission of practice.

3183:

I want to know about all the "wealthy Jews who hire people to lie about Juan Cole & create disagreement (paraphrase)."

612: 4408: 4371:

I've just had a glimps on the statistics, and I think that regarding the facts, it's better to change the sentence line 4

1577:

By that view, the EU doesn't designate ANY group as terrorists. Now, for those of you not familiar with the EU Structure,

1544: 857: 660: 598: 596: 1437: 1251:”, even if you don’t see all of those mainstream sources as reliable. I would think this fulfils my burden of evidence. 2237:

If you feel Hamas has established an Islamist mini-state in Gaza, then provide evidence from credible sources for that.

1636:

This article has an American Point of view. If not for actual quoatations you can say all the sources is American too.

4569: 3145:

If you have a comment on what I've written (rather than what I "seem to be saying"), I'll be happy to respond to that.

2557:

No someone should change the term to 'Anti-Zionist'. The article is biased in favour of Zionism. What do you expect?

1670: 1232:

And your concerns about MEMRI apply to this situation also, and a section from Verifiability is especially relevant:

606: 224:

I completely understand if editors disagree with any mention of this, given how prone it is to bias and POV pushing.

3335:

rocket and mortar shell fire, carried out by rogue terrorist organizations, in some instance in defiance of Hamas .

3464:

rocket and mortar shell fire, carried out by rogue terrorist organizations, in some instance in defiance of Hamas .

3456:

Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at the Israel Intelligence Heritage & Commemoration Center (IICC)

3413:

rocket and mortar shell fire, carried out by rogue terrorist organizations, in some instance in defiance of Hamas .

3381:

Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at the Israel Intelligence Heritage & Commemoration Center (IICC)

1321:

boards, and they have supported MEMRI’s version by reprinting it. I’ll add PMW to the references to concrete this.

600: 38: 1352: 1248: 1238: 5063: 3332:

I'd like to know how he makes this claim, seeing how Israel's own intelligence corroborates the points made here

1651: 979: 854: 657: 594: 2344:

I'm referring the the subsections entitled "Controversies." As I said, 'controversies' seems by its nature POV.

1775:

What's wrong in having this image in the article. it is hamas own poster. what neutrality we're talking about?--

527:

I hear? Hmmm, perhaps people have lives. I’ll wait a few hours and reintroduce our new version this afternoon.

5264:

Actually, never mind, I just saw where it was moved. It still seems like it's not a very good source though. -

5141:

perspective is needed. Why not _add_ a contrasting opinion or comment regarding Yassin? Instead of subtracting?

3245: 1685: 1610:

Many many muslim support Hamas and calling them terrorist just angers more. span class="db-YXV0b3NpZ25lZA": -->

5698: 2649: 2528: 2489: 2327: 1726: 1167: 1066: 5882: 4929: 4437: 4304: 4213:

I suggest you refrain from editing my additions unless you take the time to read them or the discussion here.

1163: 4453: 4416: 4397: 4328: 2568: 2548: 1620: 952: 910: 407:. Knowledge (XXG) is about neutrality and using one-sided sources are contradictory to our mission here. -- 141: 4921: 4557: 4475: 4429: 4296: 2795: 2560: 2520: 2481: 2443: 2418: 1718: 1677: 1643: 1612: 1513: 272:

Zionist bombing machine, as if they were saying to the Zionist enemy: ‘We desire death as you desire Life’.

163: 133: 5059: 4469: 4383: 3980:

covers this in detail. The hyperlink was appropriate for the material you liked, and its appropriate here.

3574: 2803: 2467: 2451: 2426: 1742: 1521: 157: 4764:

also stated that Hamas is not intent on the destruction of Israel and that nor is it politically tied to

3606:

and assume that you're joking... A mention (3 week old stub) in Knowledge (XXG) of the organisation does

2773: 2716: 2645: 2619: 2588: 1586: 1401: 1159: 5269: 5255: 5030: 4969:

I changed it into a direct quote. The alternative source provided no percentage, as far as I could tell.

4960: 4687: 4648: 4618: 1061: 889:

is not a mainstream source, given that it is a worldwide media outlet that’s been published since 1828.

97: 89: 84: 4598: 4532: 4449: 4412: 4393: 4324: 3729:

I also noted above that blindly undoing my last edit would restore that blatant piece of troll material

4909: 3274:

Haberstr, how do you decide that a source is controversial? What's the definition of "controversial"?

1176: 1155: 5733:(Backdent) Nbauman: I agree with the idea that we should follow Knowledge (XXG) guidelines regarding 5539: 5224: 5172: 5130: 4549: 3293: 1647: 1326: 1289: 1116: 985: 963: 956: 928: 893:

has a similar record, published since 1955. Here’s another mention in a premier Australian newspaper

815: 667: 631: 532: 513: 381: 316: 287: 229: 72: 67: 59: 5835: 5783: 4870:

saying "between 0% and 90%" but the second actually leaves the reader with a much different impact.

4411:. And you can find statistics of Palestinians civilians death tolls in many web sites and news now. 3932:

section not the introduction. That will be why I revise, unless you have an argument in that regard.

2769: 2712: 2615: 2584: 2578:

They are not against the Jewish religion, but definitely against Zionism and the creation of Israel

2366: 2362: 1864: 1582: 1397: 774: 770: 653: 524: 130:

The whole article smacks of Israeli intelligence propaganda it mocks the objectivity of wikipedia.

4851: 4362: 3429:

The problem with that is that Israel's own intelligence disagrees with the point above. It is not

2671: 1306: 1185: 1102:

I think your conclusions about MEMRI are wrong, and wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss them. Consider

1008: 871: 860: 604: 5871: 5734: 4594: 4528: 3815: 3441:

Hamas committed itself to enforce the arrangement on the other Palestinian terrorist organizations

2849: 5765: 5750: 5686: 5671: 5656: 5633: 5572: 5554: 5517: 5480: 5465: 5450: 5431: 5383: 5354: 5187: 5146: 4988: 4974: 4788: 4701: 4663: 4634: 4278: 4233: 4152: 4116: 4082: 3937: 3903: 3848: 3811: 3513: 3488: 3307: 3231: 3150: 2983: 2933: 2880: 2743: 2694: 2388: 2353: 2320: 2316: 2257: 2242: 2227: 2203: 2131:

2. POV reason is not proved. Yes, I have POV, but neither the image nor the image description do.

1854: 1798: 1752:

A politician's utterance probably does not carry the same weight as an official designation, no.

1348: 903: 862:

is an Israeli-American whose writing is consistently biased against the Palestinian perspective.

493: 415: 350: 4561: 4489: 4214: 4129: 4097: 4063: 3990: 3918: 3885: 3858: 3829: 3732: 3661: 3643: 3577: 3560: 3466: 3388: 3288:

Also, what's the definition of "riddled"? because atm, it seems to be 3 direct refs out of 206.

2326:

Can you link to the WP guideline that frowns on "Controversies" sections? I couldn't find it in

2179: 2000: 5605:

Hiddekel, could you explain why the Council on Foreign Relations and Los Angeles Times are not

4511:

The first Hamas affiliated suicide bombing was the Afula Bus suicide bombing on April 6, 1994.

3656:

Actually, note how frequently the Israeli government not only sites this work, but others from

3197:

Do not misquote an editor in order to make a thinly disguised personal attack. Please refrain.

1901:

by placing this image in this and other articles pretty much brings this discussion to an end.

1393: 545:

No consensus. Poorly sourced fringe view. No major media picked this up. Can you find any real

338:

instead as they are well-sourced and verified. And please, avoid quote farming because we have

5705: 5614: 4761: 4753: 4465: 4343: 3629: 3547: 3359:, though as that would be restoring some IP vandalism as ewll, which we do not want. Thanks. 3341: 3279: 3265: 3188: 3116: 2956: 2914: 2857: 2839: 2792:

not precise either. Many jews live in Iran and are not persecuted or have rights taken away.

2506: 2374: 2335: 2293: 2059: 1957: 1947:

say a lot about that group?? How is it violating POV to point out the obvious?? I did not see

1738: 1578: 1487: 1422: 1263:

of what you may think of Fox News, they have news crews, editors, fact checkers and so forth.

563: 183: 153: 120: 5400: 3615: 3443:

which had not expressed their opposition (some organizations opposed it, some were reserved).

1898: 1210: 1171: 5334: 5265: 5251: 5026: 5015: 4956: 4946: 4773: 4729: 4683: 4644: 4614: 4027: 3704: 3202: 3079: 2274: 1808: 1364: 1151: 1035: 838: 799: 791: 779: 736: 698: 453: 5494: 4543: 3603: 3352: 2128:

1. Non free image reason is radiculus. The image is as free as all other images on Commons.

807: 5860: 5625:

As for the CFR, I've stated my issues with that source's reliability in my comments above.

5529: 5214: 5162: 5120: 4757: 4565: 4493: 4379: 4218: 4133: 4101: 4067: 3994: 3922: 3889: 3862: 3833: 3736: 3665: 3647: 3581: 3564: 3470: 3392: 3289: 2818: 1790:

Could you please reduce the size of the image ;) It looks like a myspace page. Thanks. --

1322: 1285: 1112: 981: 959: 924: 890: 830: 811: 764:). If on the other hand you were suggesting a more comparative approach, then the broader 728: 663: 652:

Once again, people have moved on from this issue, leaving me behind in a lukewarm pool of

627: 528: 509: 377: 312: 283: 225: 5742: 5606: 3611: 3530: 3009: 2902: 1697: 787: 772: 546: 947:(1990) is, reaching 1.5 million readers. Apart from this paper and the Daily Telegraph, 5502: 5409: 4847: 4358: 3719: 3364: 2667: 2142: 2112: 2097: 2008: 1906: 1887: 1872: 1830: 1816: 1780: 1757: 1556: 1548: 1302: 1181: 1108: 1004: 948: 867: 863: 795: 783: 608: 5738: 5648: 4047:^ Hamas tries to enforce Gaza cease-fire Sacramento Bee, Dion Nissenbaum. July 8, 2008 1056: 602: 327: 5761: 5746: 5682: 5667: 5652: 5629: 5568: 5550: 5513: 5476: 5461: 5446: 5427: 5379: 5350: 5183: 5142: 4984: 4970: 4784: 4697: 4659: 4630: 4274: 4229: 4148: 4112: 4078: 3933: 3899: 3844: 3807: 3509: 3484: 3303: 3227: 3146: 2979: 2929: 2876: 2739: 2690: 2384: 2365:

does not specifically mention a Controversies section. That's your interpretation of

2349: 2312: 2253: 2238: 2223: 2196: 1847: 1791: 1443: 1344: 886: 408: 403:) and others who may be one-sided. Someone else may argue with you and refer to this 400: 373: 343: 335: 4517: 2540: 5840: 5788: 5701: 5610: 5441: 4339: 3621: 3539: 3337: 3275: 3261: 3184: 3112: 2952: 2910: 2853: 2835: 2502: 2370: 2331: 2289: 2170: 2055: 1953: 1479: 1414: 1143: 765: 555: 497: 256: 179: 116: 3431:"although such attacks (whether by Hamas or by other paramilitaries is uncertain)" 3385:"although such attacks (whether by Hamas or by other paramilitaries is uncertain)" 2603:

I think this is an important fact that should be mentioned in the article. See:

1147: 5366: 5330: 5314: 5298: 5078: 5011: 4942: 4769: 4725: 4093: 4023: 3700: 3198: 2604: 2270: 1360: 834: 732: 694: 449: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5208:

Until it is supported by reliable sources, the only place it belongs is at the

951:(1964) also reported it, giving us three mainstream sources in Australia alone 4746: 3108: 3083: 1701: 1209:

Neutrality requires views to be represented without bias. All editors and all

944: 339: 47: 17: 5809: 1696:...and in so doing, destroyed a reference, and removed a fact cited to seven 978:

Ambassador Shalev even included it in her speech to the UN Security Council.

404: 209: 5498: 5405: 3715: 3695: 3360: 2138: 2108: 2093: 2004: 1902: 1883: 1868: 1826: 1812: 1776: 1753: 1552: 761: 5769: 5754: 5709: 5690: 5675: 5660: 5637: 5618: 5576: 5558: 5543: 5521: 5506: 5484: 5469: 5454: 5435: 5413: 5399:

There is really no call for "...with the aim of destroying Israel" in the

5387: 5372: 5358: 5338: 5320: 5304: 5273: 5259: 5228: 5191: 5176: 5150: 5134: 5084: 5067: 5034: 5019: 4992: 4978: 4964: 4950: 4933: 4855: 4792: 4777: 4733: 4705: 4691: 4667: 4652: 4638: 4622: 4602: 4536: 4497: 4479: 4457: 4441: 4420: 4401: 4387: 4366: 4347: 4332: 4308: 4282: 4237: 4222: 4156: 4137: 4120: 4105: 4086: 4071: 4031: 3998: 3941: 3926: 3907: 3893: 3866: 3852: 3837: 3740: 3723: 3708: 3669: 3651: 3585: 3568: 3517: 3492: 3474: 3396: 3368: 3345: 3311: 3297: 3283: 3269: 3248: 3235: 3206: 3192: 3154: 3120: 2987: 2960: 2937: 2918: 2884: 2861: 2843: 2807: 2777: 2747: 2720: 2698: 2675: 2653: 2623: 2592: 2572: 2552: 2532: 2510: 2493: 2471: 2455: 2430: 2392: 2378: 2357: 2339: 2297: 2278: 2261: 2246: 2231: 2206: 2146: 2116: 2101: 2063: 2012: 1961: 1910: 1891: 1876: 1857: 1834: 1820: 1801: 1784: 1761: 1746: 1730: 1704: 1689: 1659: 1624: 1590: 1560: 1547:

may have made such a designation, but that is not the same as saying "The

1525: 1447: 1405: 1389: 1368: 1330: 1310: 1293: 1189: 1120: 1012: 989: 967: 943:

Actually, the Daily Telegraph isn’t the largest Australian newspaper, the

932: 875: 842: 819: 740: 702: 671: 635: 536: 517: 457: 418: 385: 353: 320: 291: 233: 187: 167: 145: 124: 5872:

BBC Today Programme interview with Sir Jeremy Greenstock, 12 January 2009

5845: 5793: 5644: 5110: 4742: 2768:

As long as the article states this is an opinion, it is agreeable by me.

1461: 1439: 2689:

No, Avi Shlaim is a respected Israeli historian and an excellent source.

376:, but I think what's been written for that site could be improved upon. 5814: 1055:

While you have issues with citing a magazine, I would refer you to the

4407:

You can see the statistics of death tolls of Hamas suicide attacks in

3258: 1476:

generally in the business of calling elected governments "terrorist".

5819: 5106: 1158:, I cannot bring myself to trust them after reading the critiques of 958:. This has an estimated total readership of over two million people. 905:. What’s more, the translation comes from both the Gloria Center and 4053:^ Hamas arrests Fatah spokesman in GazaJerusalem Post. June 30, 2008 2089: 4910:

http://israelipalestinian.procon.org/viewanswers.asp?questionID=374

4523: 4169:

During the June 19, 2008 lull arrangement between Hamas and Israel

3781:

During the June 19, 2008 lull arrangement between Hamas and Israel

3526: 2173:(where it is already posted) appropriate (because —objectively and 5838:

Hamas admits to using human shields, fostering 'death culture']",

5786:

Hamas admits to using human shields, fostering 'death culture']",

5497:. Let's work to keep extremes from either side taking sway here. 4056:^ Hamas arrests militants after rocket fire Reuters. July 10, 2008 3328:

Haberstr makes a comment to delete my sourced addition by stating

1343:

This section has particularly flagrant pro-Israel, anti-Hamas POV.

906: 300:

I guess I can't expect every editor to check the talk page first.

5836:

http://www.israeltoday.co.il/default.aspx?tabid=178&nid=15466

5784:

http://www.israeltoday.co.il/default.aspx?tabid=178&nid=15466

4162:

I don't understand when you say the escalation...occurred earlier

3989:

Frankly, I have no idea what I could be unresponsive about here.

3449:

defiance of Hamas (especially by Fatah and Al-Qaeda supporters).

1223:

Knowledge (XXG) does not equate Bias with Unreliability... thus,

1038:. They belong to independent publishers from different countries. 794:‘perceptions’ as there is contradictory evidence catalogued here 5849: 5823: 5797: 5209: 4765: 3957: 111:

war-crime, and protesting this destruction be "conspiratorial"?

4210:

That is the Israeli POV. I made this point explicitly for you.

3302:

You're right, Memri is not as widespread a source as I thought.

1034:

from Australia, which is produced by the News Corporation, not

4608:

Hamas figures have written respectfully of the Jewish religion

3255: 2107:

Reasons have been given, none of which are "I don't like it".

1111:

official reliability discussions is that MEMRI is acceptable.

25: 2125:

Sure you gave me the reasons, but none of them is a good one:

1628:

You should call things for what they are not to please anyone

212:

when addressing the Palestine Authority Legislative Council:

4542:

The front page says the first suicide bombing was 1993, yet

4268:

Sections 2, 3, and 4 should be made a single history section

3259:

Changing Knowledge (XXG) entries-nice work if you can get it

1673:

of world Jewish domination.<ref name=Worlddomination: -->

1394:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6583080

4750: 3968:

there is no separate wikipedia entry on the Nov 4 incident)

3953: 1579:

http://europa.eu/eur-lex/en/treaties/selected/livre107.html

3963:

discussion of the rocket attacks and the ceasefire before.

2599:

Was HAMAS originally supported by Israel to split the PLO?

4193:

A period of relative quiet between June 19 and November 4

3882:

whether by Hamas or by other paramilitaries is uncertain)

4202:

To add insult, you make a reversion on the grounds that

326:

Hi Martin, there are two problems with that section. a)

5310: 5294: 4044:^ Hamas arrests Fatah rocket cell Press TV, 11 Jul 2008 3356: 2819:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123275572295011847.html

4518:

http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_Hamas_suicide_attacks

4178:, the lull was sporadically violated by other groups 3790:, the lull was sporadically violated by other groups 3641:

Israeli Foreign Ministry directly links to this study

1436:

Hamas is a terror organization - including in the EU

1338: 802:

article, but the paucity of refs makes me sceptical.

3985:

As I've said repeatedly but you've been unresponsive

3880:

If you read those two sentences, you will note that

5649:

http://www.e-prism.org/aboutprism/staffofprism.html

1470:

does not designate them as a terrorist organisation

5681:gathering place for specialists in the mainstream. 1715:most of the claims in the article seem inflated. 106:False Claim about Anti-semitic conspiracy theories 4553:any affect at all. 01:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 4204:your rendition is POV unless Israeli side added;. 363:ref provided on the site you asked me to look at? 5378:political organization with a paramilitary wing. 1943:I am confused. How can an image made by a group 1396:) confirm this. Thus, I am reverting it back. -- 4892:I propose that the statement now read as this: 3761:Nuances of 2008 rocket 'lull' in intro section? 3506:5-month long ceasefire that ended in late 2008. 3424:5-month long ceasefire that ended in late 2008. 3387:. Israels own intelligence is certain of it. 1468:the document I was talking about. The one that 1284:Thanks mate, get back to me on what you think. 4862:Weaselly Conjecture added to the 90% statement 4829:state from the start, vowed to exact revenge. 4587:I will update this page when I find something. 3407:Tarc is now taking it upon himself to revert 3330:"sources controversial, unwarranted certainty" 2169:and according to policy then you may find or 3958:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources/Noticeboard. 2605:http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8449 2156:You are saying that 'tells alot what hamas 8: 1669:"The enemy is defined primarily in terms of 549:saying this is the mainstream Hamas opinion? 5512:I'll reconsider my position on this matter. 4392:I 'm agree with Morosop00 on that sentence. 3461:Now see how that excerpt coordinates with. 3451:Hamas was careful to maintain the ceasefire 1842:tells a lot about insisting on keeping it. 3972:The same wikipedia entry from the excerpt 5810:http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=RTu-AUE9ycs 4874:along with the source of the statement. 4550:USA Today | Main events in Hamas' history 3876:all of it is widely acknowledged as true. 3822:massively expanded discussion of the lull 4524:http://en.wikipedia.org/Baruch_Goldstein 3078:(BTW, if you want the long answer, read 1339:'End of 2008 Ceasefire': Nearly Pure POV 1030:You’re mixing up my references, I cited 885:PinkWorld. It’s difficult to argue that 806:what I’ve found without imparting bias ( 5775: 3573:Looks like it is, of course, reliable. 1390:http://www.tkb.org/Group.jsp?groupID=49 1239:has been published by a reliable source 257:Human Shields in Gaza and the West Bank 5812:Hamas admits it uses human shields]", 5645:http://www.robinwright.net/author.html 5100:Sheikh Yassin aids an Israeli civilian 4544:CNN | Timeline: The evolution of Hamas 3956:and see the associated discussion for 2905:is written very generally. How do you 1846:is a point of view. Tarc is right. -- 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3760: 1773:File:Gilad Shalit on Hamas poster.jpg 1639:This article is ridiculously BIASED 498:Human_shield § Gaza_and_the_West_Bank 7: 5160:should be taken as a unfunny joke.-- 2305: 1383:European Union terrorist designation 552:Until then, this stays out. Cheers, 374:Human shields#Gaza and the West Bank 336:Human shields#Gaza and the West Bank 4206:My source is cited directly by the 3529:is neither and official body nor a 2346:Knowledge (XXG):The perfect article 1241:, not whether we think it is true. 859:as reliable sources. Micah Halpern 853:I honestly do not recognise either 4166:Let me remind you your first reply 3559:How is that not a reliable source? 3008:I think that Juan Cole is just as 24: 4720:Quotes from Sir Jeremy Greenstock 4142:I don't understand when you say " 523:Is that the deafening silence of 4809:W. W. Norton & Company 2001 4195:highlights how your addition of 4175:up to the November 4th IDF raid 3787:up to the November 4th IDF raid 2823:How Israel Helped to Spawn Hamas 483:Militancy and political violence 29: 5885:IslamOnline.net, March 24, 2004 5290:Hamas - a "social" organization 1844:tells alot what hamas really is 1840:tells alot what hamas really is 1671:antisemitic conspiracy theories 1225:a reliable source can be biased 205:partisan to warrant inclusion. 4813:?? (why the different dates?) 4756:stated in an interview on the 4504:Suicide Bombings a retaliation 2870:The MEMRI and Ynetnews Problem 1388:and, further, other sources ( 311:Thanks buddy, get back to me. 1: 5770:00:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 5755:19:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC) 5691:00:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 5676:19:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC) 4409:List of Hamas suicide attacks 3435:Here is Israeli Intelligence 1811:is simply serves no purpose. 1690:19:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 1660:13:35, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 1545:Council of the European Union 5710:20:09, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5661:18:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5638:18:02, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5619:17:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5577:16:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5559:17:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5544:16:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5522:16:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5507:15:38, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5485:16:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5470:16:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5455:15:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5436:06:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5414:17:20, 8 February 2009 (UTC) 5388:06:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5373:06:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5359:20:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC) 5339:15:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC) 5321:12:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC) 5305:12:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC) 5274:21:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5260:21:24, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5229:21:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5192:21:09, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5177:20:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5151:20:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5135:20:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5085:09:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5068:08:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 5035:15:21, 8 February 2009 (UTC) 5020:15:10, 8 February 2009 (UTC) 4993:17:02, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 4979:16:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 4965:14:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 4951:13:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 4934:04:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 4856:04:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 4807:The Iron Wall By Avi Shlaim 4793:16:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 4778:10:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 4734:15:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 4706:16:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 4692:06:13, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 4668:05:11, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 4653:22:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 4639:21:09, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 4623:15:35, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 4603:13:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 4537:08:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4498:03:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 4480:19:32, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 4458:08:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 4348:18:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 4309:20:09, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 4283:07:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 4238:16:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 4223:08:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 4157:03:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 4138:00:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 4121:23:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4106:21:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4087:21:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4072:20:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4032:20:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3999:20:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3942:20:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3927:19:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3908:19:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3894:19:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3867:19:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3853:19:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3838:19:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3816:18:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3741:18:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3724:18:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3709:16:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3670:15:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3652:15:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3586:15:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3569:15:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3518:19:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3493:19:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3475:14:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3397:14:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3369:14:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3346:08:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3312:18:33, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 3298:22:46, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 3284:16:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 3270:17:41, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3249:14:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3236:12:12, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3207:09:24, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3193:06:13, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3155:23:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 3121:22:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 2988:22:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 2961:21:17, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 2938:20:49, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 2919:19:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 2885:15:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 2862:01:32, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 2844:01:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 2808:07:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 2778:13:16, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 2748:20:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 2721:19:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 2699:07:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 2676:09:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 2654:06:42, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 2624:21:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 2593:23:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 2573:14:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 2533:14:57, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 2511:18:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 2393:22:48, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 2379:18:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 2358:23:26, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 2340:23:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 2321:20:49, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 2298:21:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 2279:08:31, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 2262:17:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 2247:03:29, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 2232:21:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 2207:00:28, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 2147:14:16, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 2117:05:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 2102:01:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 2064:21:10, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 2054:part is the most important. 2013:19:59, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1962:19:36, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1911:05:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 1892:23:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 1877:20:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 1858:19:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 1835:02:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 1821:22:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 1802:21:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 1785:14:57, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 1762:19:22, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 1747:18:25, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 1731:07:27, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 1369:08:16, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 1353:03:42, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 1331:03:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 1311:00:17, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 1294:00:11, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 1190:16:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 1121:10:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 1013:18:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 990:06:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 968:06:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 933:04:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 876:03:24, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 843:12:47, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 820:02:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 741:20:26, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 703:20:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 672:21:15, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 636:22:38, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 537:22:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC) 518:23:01, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 458:13:57, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 419:13:05, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 386:12:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 354:12:40, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 321:12:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 188:18:52, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 168:19:35, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 125:18:57, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 5647:and about Reuven Paz here: 4442:02:16, 6 January 2009 (UTC) 4421:07:18, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 4402:05:44, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 4388:19:55, 3 January 2009 (UTC) 4367:17:46, 3 January 2009 (UTC) 4333:14:38, 3 January 2009 (UTC) 2553:20:25, 9 January 2009 (UTC) 2494:10:47, 8 January 2009 (UTC) 2472:03:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC) 2456:00:56, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 2431:20:40, 3 January 2009 (UTC) 1705:06:27, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 1625:15:40, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 1526:20:48, 3 January 2009 (UTC) 909:. This is then reported by 292:23:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC) 234:23:04, 8 January 2009 (UTC) 146:05:25, 8 January 2009 (UTC) 5902: 3614:. I'm taking the issue to 3379:It is a direct quote from 1633:biased in favor of Hamas. 1591:15:40, 14 March 2008 (UTC) 1561:15:32, 14 March 2008 (UTC) 1448:15:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC) 1406:04:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC) 1274:...while some editors may 491: 2852:thanks to Michael Moore. 2664:from a Guardian article: 790:. I only emphasise it as 282:. What do editors think? 5883:“Who was Sheikh Yassin?” 5651:(press on the C.V. link) 4815:ISBN-13: 978-0393321128 4741:However, senior British 4208:Israeli foreign ministry 4181:, sometimes in defiance 3793:, sometimes in defiance 3774:30 words, one citation. 1172:CNN's Arabic translators 5049:a very beatiful country 4546:says it was April 1994. 3974:"during a 5-month long 2951:down the rabbit hole!! 2829:The Wall Street Journal 2306:'Controversies' Section 911:Palestinian_Media_Watch 5115: 5091:Removal of silly story 4188: 3802:53 words, 7 citations 3800: 3772: 3533:. I have reverted you. 3508: 2269:still do? Same thing. 1282: 1266: 1244: 1230: 1216: 274: 5735:avoiding weasel words 5312:- 'back in the day -- 5097: 4754:Sir Jeremy Greenstock 4738:Here's the passage: 4478:comment was added at 4167: 3779: 3768: 3610:make it a legitimate 3527:terrorism-info.org.il 3503: 1768:Removing of the image 1606:Neutral Point of View 1271: 1257: 1234: 1220: 1206: 1062:Le Monde Diplomatique 330:(translation) and b) 269: 166:comment was added at 42:of past discussions. 4799:possible source text 3694:I would like to ask 4758:BBC Today Programme 4745:and former British 3639:Good. Note how the 2738:matter should rest. 2180:undue weight policy 1700:. I've fixed that. 1032:The Daily Telegraph 895:The Daily Telegraph 488:Themes of martyrdom 444:is not the same as 4696:Sounds good to me. 3954:pedrito's comments 3948:nothing is pending 3913:I'll try to revise 3635:- 02.02.2009 15:35 3553:- 02.02.2009 14:59 3057:shouldn't use him? 2583:Zionist movement. 2090:WP.I don't like it 1493:- 14.03.2008 15:28 1428:- 14.03.2008 15:19 569:- 15.01.2009 12:09 494:Martyrdom_in_Islam 5055:Guerrilla warfare 4924:comment added by 4574: 4560:comment added by 4432:comment added by 4299:comment added by 3636: 3554: 3324:Recent reversions 2826:By ANDREW HIGGINS 2798:comment added by 2563:comment added by 2523:comment added by 2484:comment added by 2446:comment added by 2421:comment added by 2217:Islamist? (Again) 2205: 1856: 1800: 1721:comment added by 1680:comment added by 1663: 1646:comment added by 1615:comment added by 1516:comment added by 1494: 1464:, thanks! That's 1429: 570: 417: 352: 136:comment added by 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5893: 5886: 5880: 5874: 5869: 5863: 5858: 5852: 5832: 5826: 5806: 5800: 5780: 5743:reliable sources 5537: 5532: 5369: 5317: 5301: 5222: 5217: 5170: 5165: 5128: 5123: 5081: 4936: 4573: 4554: 4483: 4444: 4311: 3632: 3624: 3619: 3550: 3542: 3537: 3080:John Stuart Mill 2832:January 24, 2009 2810: 2575: 2535: 2496: 2458: 2433: 2202: 2199: 1853: 1850: 1809:History of Hamas 1797: 1794: 1733: 1698:reliable sources 1692: 1662: 1640: 1528: 1490: 1482: 1477: 1425: 1417: 1412: 1036:Barclay Brothers 800:Mahmoud_al-Zahar 626:Get back to me. 566: 558: 553: 508:How about that? 414: 411: 349: 346: 248:Use of civilians 171: 148: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5901: 5900: 5896: 5895: 5894: 5892: 5891: 5890: 5889: 5881: 5877: 5870: 5866: 5859: 5855: 5833: 5829: 5807: 5803: 5781: 5777: 5535: 5530: 5367: 5315: 5299: 5292: 5220: 5215: 5168: 5163: 5126: 5121: 5102: 5093: 5079: 5060:Sharonyoavweiss 5051: 4919: 4864: 4801: 4722: 4610: 4555: 4506: 4473: 4427: 4320: 4294: 4290: 4270: 3763: 3630: 3622: 3548: 3540: 3531:reliable source 3326: 2872: 2793: 2601: 2558: 2518: 2479: 2441: 2416: 2407: 2308: 2219: 2197: 1848: 1792: 1770: 1716: 1675: 1648:Admit-the-truth 1641: 1608: 1511: 1488: 1480: 1423: 1415: 1385: 1377: 1341: 1249:reliable source 891:National_Review 778:I wouldn’t say 729:Mahmud az-Zahar 564: 556: 500: 490: 485: 409: 344: 202: 161: 131: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5899: 5897: 5888: 5887: 5875: 5864: 5853: 5827: 5801: 5774: 5773: 5772: 5731: 5730: 5729: 5728: 5727: 5726: 5725: 5724: 5723: 5722: 5721: 5720: 5719: 5718: 5717: 5716: 5715: 5714: 5713: 5712: 5695: 5694: 5693: 5590: 5589: 5588: 5587: 5586: 5585: 5584: 5583: 5582: 5581: 5580: 5579: 5565: 5564: 5563: 5562: 5561: 5491: 5490: 5489: 5488: 5487: 5397: 5396: 5395: 5394: 5393: 5392: 5391: 5390: 5344: 5343: 5342: 5341: 5324: 5323: 5291: 5288: 5287: 5286: 5285: 5284: 5283: 5282: 5281: 5280: 5279: 5278: 5277: 5276: 5238: 5237: 5236: 5235: 5234: 5233: 5232: 5231: 5199: 5198: 5197: 5196: 5195: 5194: 5154: 5153: 5101: 5098: 5095:I've removed: 5092: 5089: 5088: 5087: 5050: 5047: 5046: 5045: 5044: 5043: 5042: 5041: 5040: 5039: 5038: 5037: 5000: 4999: 4998: 4997: 4996: 4995: 4981: 4863: 4860: 4846: 4843: 4841: 4839: 4834: 4832: 4827: 4825: 4820: 4818: 4814: 4812: 4810: 4808: 4800: 4797: 4796: 4795: 4721: 4718: 4717: 4716: 4715: 4714: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4708: 4679: 4673: 4609: 4606: 4591: 4590: 4589: 4588: 4582: 4581: 4580: 4579: 4547: 4522: 4514:Please check: 4505: 4502: 4485: 4484: 4406: 4353:Did you mean " 4351: 4350: 4319: 4316: 4314: 4289: 4286: 4269: 4266: 4265: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4261: 4260: 4259: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4243: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4211: 4200: 4189: 4186: 4183: 4180: 4177: 4174: 4171: 4164: 4145: 4125: 4059: 4058: 4057: 4054: 4051: 4048: 4045: 4039: 4010: 4009: 4008: 4007: 4006: 4005: 4004: 4003: 4002: 4001: 3987: 3981: 3970: 3964: 3960: 3950: 3915: 3878: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3825: 3798: 3795: 3792: 3789: 3786: 3783: 3762: 3759: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3747: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3743: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3672: 3654: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3571: 3534: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3459: 3458: 3453: 3445: 3444: 3427: 3426: 3416: 3415: 3406: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3372: 3371: 3325: 3322: 3321: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3242: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2922: 2921: 2898: 2897: 2892: 2891: 2871: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2833: 2830: 2827: 2824: 2821: 2815: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2684: 2683: 2665: 2662: 2661: 2646:Monkeybollocks 2629: 2627: 2626: 2600: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2525:90.198.200.126 2514: 2513: 2486:90.203.189.119 2412: 2411: 2406: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2328:WP:CONTROVERSY 2307: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2282: 2281: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2218: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2129: 2126: 2120: 2119: 2087: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1769: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1723:76.199.138.239 1708: 1707: 1682:189.87.143.249 1607: 1604: 1602: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1549:European Union 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1431: 1430: 1384: 1381: 1376: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1340: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1315: 1314: 1296: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 995: 994: 993: 992: 973: 972: 971: 970: 949:The_Australian 938: 937: 936: 935: 917: 916: 915: 914: 902:and News Blaze 880: 879: 850: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 796:First_Intifada 784:First_Intifada 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 674: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 574: 573: 572: 571: 550: 540: 539: 506: 505: 489: 486: 484: 481: 470:(Reset indent) 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 460: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 391: 390: 389: 388: 367: 366: 365: 364: 357: 356: 295: 294: 276: 275: 266: 265: 261: 260: 251: 250: 244: 243: 238: 201: 200:Human Shields? 198: 193: 192: 191: 190: 173: 172: 128: 127: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5898: 5884: 5879: 5876: 5873: 5868: 5865: 5862: 5857: 5854: 5851: 5847: 5843: 5842: 5837: 5831: 5828: 5825: 5821: 5817: 5816: 5811: 5805: 5802: 5799: 5795: 5791: 5790: 5785: 5779: 5776: 5771: 5767: 5763: 5759: 5758: 5757: 5756: 5752: 5748: 5744: 5740: 5739:verifiability 5736: 5711: 5707: 5703: 5699: 5696: 5692: 5688: 5684: 5679: 5678: 5677: 5673: 5669: 5664: 5663: 5662: 5658: 5654: 5650: 5646: 5641: 5640: 5639: 5635: 5631: 5626: 5622: 5621: 5620: 5616: 5612: 5608: 5604: 5603: 5602: 5601: 5600: 5599: 5598: 5597: 5596: 5595: 5594: 5593: 5592: 5591: 5578: 5574: 5570: 5566: 5560: 5556: 5552: 5547: 5546: 5545: 5542: 5541: 5538: 5533: 5525: 5524: 5523: 5519: 5515: 5510: 5509: 5508: 5504: 5500: 5496: 5492: 5486: 5482: 5478: 5473: 5472: 5471: 5467: 5463: 5458: 5457: 5456: 5452: 5448: 5443: 5439: 5438: 5437: 5433: 5429: 5424: 5423: 5422: 5421: 5420: 5419: 5418: 5417: 5416: 5415: 5411: 5407: 5402: 5389: 5385: 5381: 5376: 5375: 5374: 5371: 5370: 5362: 5361: 5360: 5356: 5352: 5348: 5347: 5346: 5345: 5340: 5336: 5332: 5328: 5327: 5326: 5325: 5322: 5319: 5318: 5311: 5309: 5308: 5307: 5306: 5303: 5302: 5295: 5289: 5275: 5271: 5267: 5263: 5262: 5261: 5257: 5253: 5248: 5247: 5246: 5245: 5244: 5243: 5242: 5241: 5240: 5239: 5230: 5227: 5226: 5223: 5218: 5211: 5207: 5206: 5205: 5204: 5203: 5202: 5201: 5200: 5193: 5189: 5185: 5180: 5179: 5178: 5175: 5174: 5171: 5166: 5158: 5157: 5156: 5155: 5152: 5148: 5144: 5139: 5138: 5137: 5136: 5133: 5132: 5129: 5124: 5114: 5112: 5108: 5099: 5096: 5090: 5086: 5083: 5082: 5075: 5072: 5071: 5070: 5069: 5065: 5061: 5056: 5048: 5036: 5032: 5028: 5023: 5022: 5021: 5017: 5013: 5008: 5007: 5006: 5005: 5004: 5003: 5002: 5001: 4994: 4990: 4986: 4982: 4980: 4976: 4972: 4968: 4967: 4966: 4962: 4958: 4954: 4953: 4952: 4948: 4944: 4939: 4938: 4937: 4935: 4931: 4927: 4926:74.12.223.195 4923: 4916: 4912: 4911: 4907: 4904: 4900: 4896: 4893: 4890: 4886: 4882: 4879: 4875: 4871: 4867: 4861: 4859: 4857: 4853: 4849: 4837: 4830: 4823: 4816: 4805: 4798: 4794: 4790: 4786: 4782: 4781: 4780: 4779: 4775: 4771: 4767: 4763: 4759: 4755: 4752: 4748: 4744: 4739: 4736: 4735: 4731: 4727: 4719: 4707: 4703: 4699: 4695: 4694: 4693: 4689: 4685: 4680: 4678: 4674: 4671: 4670: 4669: 4665: 4661: 4656: 4655: 4654: 4650: 4646: 4642: 4641: 4640: 4636: 4632: 4627: 4626: 4625: 4624: 4620: 4616: 4607: 4605: 4604: 4600: 4596: 4586: 4585: 4584: 4583: 4576: 4575: 4571: 4567: 4563: 4559: 4551: 4548: 4545: 4541: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4534: 4530: 4526: 4525: 4520: 4519: 4515: 4512: 4509: 4503: 4501: 4499: 4495: 4491: 4481: 4477: 4471: 4467: 4462: 4461: 4460: 4459: 4455: 4451: 4445: 4443: 4439: 4435: 4434:84.195.61.170 4431: 4423: 4422: 4418: 4414: 4410: 4404: 4403: 4399: 4395: 4390: 4389: 4385: 4381: 4378: 4374: 4369: 4368: 4364: 4360: 4356: 4349: 4345: 4341: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4334: 4330: 4326: 4317: 4315: 4312: 4310: 4306: 4302: 4301:71.166.99.247 4298: 4287: 4285: 4284: 4280: 4276: 4267: 4239: 4235: 4231: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4220: 4216: 4212: 4209: 4205: 4201: 4198: 4194: 4190: 4187: 4185: 4182: 4179: 4176: 4173: 4170: 4165: 4163: 4160: 4159: 4158: 4154: 4150: 4143: 4141: 4140: 4139: 4135: 4131: 4126: 4124: 4123: 4122: 4118: 4114: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4103: 4099: 4095: 4090: 4089: 4088: 4084: 4080: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4069: 4065: 4060: 4055: 4052: 4049: 4046: 4043: 4042: 4040: 4038: 4035: 4034: 4033: 4029: 4025: 4020: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4011: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3988: 3986: 3982: 3979: 3977: 3971: 3969: 3965: 3961: 3959: 3955: 3951: 3949: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3939: 3935: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3924: 3920: 3916: 3914: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3905: 3901: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3891: 3887: 3883: 3879: 3877: 3874: 3868: 3864: 3860: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3850: 3846: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3835: 3831: 3826: 3823: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3813: 3809: 3806:written down. 3803: 3799: 3797: 3794: 3791: 3788: 3785: 3782: 3778: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3742: 3738: 3734: 3730: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3706: 3702: 3697: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3671: 3667: 3663: 3659: 3655: 3653: 3649: 3645: 3642: 3638: 3637: 3634: 3633: 3626: 3625: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3605: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3587: 3583: 3579: 3576: 3572: 3570: 3566: 3562: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3552: 3551: 3544: 3543: 3535: 3532: 3528: 3525: 3524: 3519: 3515: 3511: 3507: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3465: 3457: 3454: 3452: 3447: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3433: 3432: 3425: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3414: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3354: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3343: 3339: 3336: 3331: 3323: 3313: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3295: 3291: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3260: 3257: 3254:FlaviaR, see 3253: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3247: 3238: 3237: 3233: 3229: 3208: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3156: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3011: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2962: 2958: 2954: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2920: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2899: 2894: 2893: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2869: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2841: 2837: 2834: 2831: 2828: 2825: 2822: 2820: 2816: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2779: 2775: 2771: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2641: 2638: 2635: 2632: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2607: 2606: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2576: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2565:212.219.118.2 2562: 2555: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2545:67.188.215.55 2542: 2536: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2475: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2459: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2438: 2434: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2409: 2408: 2404: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2216: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2181: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2159: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2130: 2127: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1845: 1841: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1734: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1712: 1706: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1672: 1667: 1664: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1637: 1634: 1630: 1629: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1617:137.205.183.4 1614: 1605: 1603: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1492: 1491: 1484: 1483: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1438: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1427: 1426: 1419: 1418: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1382: 1380: 1375:Pronunciation 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1281: 1280: 1277: 1270: 1265: 1264: 1262: 1256: 1252: 1250: 1243: 1242: 1240: 1233: 1229: 1228: 1226: 1219: 1215: 1214: 1212: 1205: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1178: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1067: 1063: 1058: 1057:Verifiability 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 991: 987: 983: 980: 977: 976: 975: 974: 969: 965: 961: 957: 955: 953: 950: 946: 942: 941: 940: 939: 934: 930: 926: 921: 920: 919: 918: 912: 908: 904: 901: 898: 896: 892: 888: 887:The_Spectator 884: 883: 882: 881: 877: 873: 869: 864: 861: 858: 855: 852: 851: 844: 840: 836: 832: 828: 827: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 817: 813: 809: 803: 801: 797: 793: 789: 785: 781: 776: 775: 773: 771: 767: 763: 757: 742: 738: 734: 730: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 704: 700: 696: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 673: 669: 665: 661: 658: 655: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 637: 633: 629: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 613: 611: 609: 607: 605: 603: 601: 599: 597: 595: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 568: 567: 560: 559: 551: 548: 544: 543: 542: 541: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 521: 520: 519: 515: 511: 502: 501: 499: 495: 487: 482: 480: 476: 472: 471: 459: 455: 451: 447: 443: 439: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 420: 416: 412: 406: 402: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 387: 383: 379: 375: 371: 370: 369: 368: 361: 360: 359: 358: 355: 351: 347: 342:for that. -- 341: 337: 333: 329: 328:verifiability 325: 324: 323: 322: 318: 314: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 278: 277: 273: 268: 267: 263: 262: 259: 258: 253: 252: 249: 246: 245: 241: 240: 239: 236: 235: 231: 227: 222: 218: 217: 213: 211: 206: 199: 197: 189: 185: 181: 177: 176: 175: 174: 169: 165: 159: 155: 151: 150: 149: 147: 143: 139: 135: 126: 122: 118: 114: 113: 112: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5878: 5867: 5856: 5841:Israel Today 5839: 5830: 5813: 5804: 5789:Israel Today 5787: 5778: 5732: 5624: 5540:(yada, yada) 5528: 5442:Hells Angels 5398: 5365: 5313: 5297: 5293: 5225:(yada, yada) 5213: 5173:(yada, yada) 5161: 5131:(yada, yada) 5119: 5116: 5103: 5094: 5077: 5073: 5054: 5052: 4917: 4913: 4908: 4905: 4901: 4897: 4894: 4891: 4887: 4883: 4880: 4876: 4872: 4868: 4865: 4838: 4831: 4824: 4817: 4806: 4802: 4740: 4737: 4723: 4675: 4611: 4592: 4527: 4521: 4516: 4513: 4510: 4507: 4486: 4466:Kingoomieiii 4450:Erik.catalan 4446: 4424: 4413:Erik.catalan 4405: 4394:Erik.catalan 4391: 4376: 4372: 4370: 4354: 4352: 4325:Erik.catalan 4323:civilians.-- 4321: 4313: 4291: 4271: 4207: 4203: 4196: 4192: 4168: 4161: 4036: 3984: 3973: 3967: 3947: 3912: 3881: 3875: 3821: 3804: 3801: 3780: 3776: 3773: 3769: 3764: 3728: 3628: 3620: 3607: 3575:Wiki on IICC 3546: 3538: 3504: 3462: 3460: 3450: 3440: 3434: 3430: 3428: 3422: 3417: 3411: 3405: 3384: 3333: 3329: 3327: 3239: 3225: 2906: 2873: 2800:130.39.0.200 2790: 2663: 2642: 2639: 2636: 2633: 2628: 2608: 2602: 2577: 2556: 2537: 2515: 2476: 2460: 2448:78.1.144.121 2439: 2435: 2423:24.23.124.21 2413: 2405:Antisemitism 2309: 2220: 2174: 2171:Gilad Shalit 2166: 2162: 2157: 2136: 2086: 1948: 1944: 1843: 1839: 1771: 1739:Deinocheirus 1735: 1713: 1709: 1668: 1665: 1638: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1609: 1601: 1518:24.23.124.21 1486: 1478: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1421: 1413: 1386: 1378: 1342: 1283: 1273: 1272: 1267: 1259: 1258: 1253: 1245: 1236: 1235: 1231: 1222: 1221: 1217: 1208: 1207: 1203: 1177:The Guardian 1168:William Rugh 1156:translations 804: 788:fringe issue 777: 766:Human_shield 758: 755: 562: 554: 507: 477: 473: 469: 468: 445: 441: 440:the school. 437: 310: 306: 302: 298: 296: 279: 270: 254: 247: 237: 223: 219: 215: 214: 207: 203: 194: 154:Kingoomieiii 138:75.42.149.81 129: 109: 78: 43: 37: 5266:Solid Reign 5252:Solid Reign 5027:Solid Reign 4957:Solid Reign 4920:—Preceding 4684:Solid Reign 4645:Solid Reign 4615:Solid Reign 4556:—Preceding 4474:—Preceding 4428:—Preceding 4357:civilians"? 4295:—Preceding 3256:Muzzlewatch 2794:—Preceding 2559:—Preceding 2519:—Preceding 2480:—Preceding 2442:—Preceding 2417:—Preceding 2369:, correct? 2167:objectively 1717:—Preceding 1676:—Preceding 1642:—Preceding 1611:—Preceding 1512:—Preceding 1107:reprinting, 581:No worries: 210:Fathi Hamad 162:—Preceding 132:—Preceding 36:This is an 5053:Under the 4762:Greenstock 4747:Ambassador 4380:Morosoph00 4184:of Hamas . 4128:discussion 4062:paragraph. 3884:is untrue. 3843:additions. 3796:of Hamas . 3618:. Cheers, 3290:Martin0001 3109:On Liberty 3084:On Liberty 2464:18.74.7.76 2367:WP:PERFECT 2363:WP:PERFECT 2163:rationally 1865:WP:NONFREE 1323:Martin0001 1286:Martin0001 1261:Regardless 1162:(see also 1113:Martin0001 982:Martin0001 960:Martin0001 945:Herald_Sun 925:Martin0001 831:Martin0001 812:Martin0001 792:az-Zahar’s 780:az-Zahar’s 664:Martin0001 628:Martin0001 529:Martin0001 510:Martin0001 492:See also: 401:an example 378:Martin0001 340:Wikisource 332:neutrality 313:Martin0001 284:Martin0001 255:See also: 226:Martin0001 98:Archive 15 90:Archive 12 85:Archive 11 79:Archive 10 18:Talk:Hamas 5527:aspect.-- 4848:PinkWorld 4842:Page 587 4833:Page 586 4826:Page 525 4819:Page 459 4375:to this: 4359:Debresser 3976:ceasefire 2850:free link 2848:Here's a 2770:Selalerer 2713:Selalerer 2668:PinkWorld 2616:Selalerer 2585:Selalerer 2311:sometime. 1952:confused. 1303:PinkWorld 1182:PinkWorld 1160:Juan Cole 1005:PinkWorld 868:PinkWorld 829:Reply to 654:consensus 525:consensus 73:Archive 9 68:Archive 8 60:Archive 5 5846:March 16 5794:March 16 5762:Haberstr 5747:Hiddekel 5683:Haberstr 5668:Hiddekel 5653:Haberstr 5630:Hiddekel 5569:Hiddekel 5551:Haberstr 5514:Haberstr 5477:Hiddekel 5462:Haberstr 5447:Hiddekel 5428:Haberstr 5380:Haberstr 5351:Haberstr 5184:Haberstr 5182:section. 5143:Haberstr 5111:Rantissi 4985:Haberstr 4971:Haberstr 4922:unsigned 4785:Haberstr 4743:Diplomat 4698:Haberstr 4660:Haberstr 4631:Haberstr 4570:contribs 4558:unsigned 4430:unsigned 4297:unsigned 4275:Haberstr 4230:Haberstr 4149:Haberstr 4113:Haberstr 4079:Haberstr 3934:Haberstr 3900:Haberstr 3845:Haberstr 3808:Haberstr 3658:the IICC 3536:Cheers, 3510:Haberstr 3485:Haberstr 3304:Haberstr 3228:Telaviv1 3147:Haberstr 2980:Haberstr 2930:Haberstr 2877:Haberstr 2796:unsigned 2740:Haberstr 2691:Haberstr 2561:unsigned 2521:unsigned 2482:unsigned 2444:unsigned 2419:unsigned 2385:Haberstr 2350:Haberstr 2313:Haberstr 2254:Hiddekel 2239:Haberstr 2224:Hiddekel 2198:FayssalF 2001:WP:UNDUE 1867:policy. 1849:FayssalF 1793:FayssalF 1719:unsigned 1678:unsigned 1656:contribs 1644:unsigned 1613:unsigned 1514:unsigned 1345:Haberstr 762:B'Tselem 410:FayssalF 345:FayssalF 134:unsigned 5861:Reuters 5815:YouTube 5702:Nbauman 5611:Nbauman 4749:to the 4595:Jundi78 4578:attack. 4529:Jundi78 4476:undated 4355:Israeli 4340:FlaviaR 4288:Charter 3623:pedrito 3616:WP:RS/N 3541:pedrito 3338:Wood345 3276:Nbauman 3262:Nbauman 3244:check. 3185:FlaviaR 3113:Nbauman 2953:FlaviaR 2911:Nbauman 2854:Nbauman 2836:Nbauman 2660:enough. 2609:Thanks 2541:FAS.org 2503:FlaviaR 2371:Nbauman 2332:Nbauman 2290:FlaviaR 2056:FlaviaR 2003:-wise. 1954:FlaviaR 1899:WP:NPOV 1481:pedrito 1466:exactly 1416:pedrito 1276:dislike 1211:sources 557:pedrito 180:FlaviaR 164:undated 117:FlaviaR 39:archive 5820:May 15 5741:, and 5536:crewer 5495:WP:WTA 5368:Flewis 5316:Flewis 5300:Flewis 5221:crewer 5169:crewer 5127:crewer 5107:Yassin 5080:Flewis 4770:Pexise 4726:Pexise 4448:Hamas. 3604:WP:AGF 3353:WP:WTA 2158:really 1702:Jayjg 1065:line.” 5607:WP:RS 5331:Wayne 5012:Wayne 4943:Wayne 4858:Pink 4811:2000 4562:G51g7 4500:Koby 4490:Kobpi 4215:G51g7 4130:G51g7 4098:G51g7 4094:Wayne 4064:G51g7 4024:Wayne 3991:G51g7 3919:G51g7 3886:G51g7 3859:G51g7 3830:G51g7 3733:G51g7 3701:Wayne 3662:G51g7 3644:G51g7 3612:WP:RS 3602:I'll 3578:G51g7 3561:G51g7 3467:G51g7 3389:G51g7 3241:that. 3199:Wayne 3035:Post? 3010:WP:RS 2903:WP:RS 2896:them. 2678:Pink 2271:Wayne 1460:Wow, 1361:Wayne 1144:MEMRI 907:MEMRI 835:Wayne 733:Wayne 695:Wayne 547:WP:RS 450:Wayne 405:video 16:< 5850:2008 5824:2008 5798:2008 5766:talk 5751:talk 5706:talk 5687:talk 5672:talk 5657:talk 5634:talk 5615:talk 5573:talk 5555:talk 5531:brew 5518:talk 5503:talk 5499:Tarc 5481:talk 5466:talk 5451:talk 5432:talk 5410:talk 5406:Tarc 5401:lead 5384:talk 5355:talk 5335:talk 5270:talk 5256:talk 5216:brew 5210:joke 5188:talk 5164:brew 5147:talk 5122:brew 5109:and 5074:Done 5064:talk 5031:talk 5016:talk 4989:talk 4975:talk 4961:talk 4947:talk 4930:talk 4852:talk 4789:talk 4774:talk 4766:Iran 4730:talk 4702:talk 4688:talk 4664:talk 4649:talk 4635:talk 4619:talk 4599:talk 4566:talk 4533:talk 4494:talk 4470:talk 4454:talk 4438:talk 4417:talk 4398:talk 4384:talk 4363:talk 4344:talk 4329:talk 4305:talk 4279:talk 4234:talk 4219:talk 4153:talk 4134:talk 4117:talk 4102:talk 4083:talk 4068:talk 4028:talk 3995:talk 3952:See 3938:talk 3923:talk 3904:talk 3890:talk 3863:talk 3849:talk 3834:talk 3812:talk 3737:talk 3720:talk 3716:Tarc 3705:talk 3696:Tarc 3666:talk 3648:talk 3631:talk 3582:talk 3565:talk 3549:talk 3514:talk 3489:talk 3471:talk 3393:talk 3365:talk 3361:Tarc 3357:this 3351:Per 3342:talk 3308:talk 3294:talk 3280:talk 3266:talk 3232:talk 3203:talk 3189:talk 3151:talk 3117:talk 2984:talk 2957:talk 2934:talk 2915:talk 2907:show 2881:talk 2858:talk 2840:talk 2804:talk 2774:talk 2744:talk 2717:talk 2695:talk 2672:talk 2650:talk 2620:talk 2589:talk 2569:talk 2549:talk 2529:talk 2507:talk 2490:talk 2468:talk 2452:talk 2427:talk 2389:talk 2383:Yes. 2375:talk 2354:talk 2336:talk 2317:talk 2294:talk 2275:talk 2258:talk 2243:talk 2228:talk 2165:and 2143:talk 2139:Mbz1 2113:talk 2109:Tarc 2098:talk 2094:Mbz1 2060:talk 2009:talk 2005:Tarc 1958:talk 1907:talk 1903:Tarc 1888:talk 1884:Mbz1 1873:talk 1869:Tarc 1831:talk 1827:Mbz1 1817:talk 1813:Tarc 1781:talk 1777:Mbz1 1758:talk 1754:Tarc 1743:talk 1727:talk 1686:talk 1652:talk 1621:talk 1587:talk 1583:Nate 1557:talk 1553:Tarc 1543:The 1522:talk 1489:talk 1444:talk 1424:talk 1402:talk 1398:Nate 1365:talk 1349:talk 1327:talk 1313:Pink 1307:talk 1290:talk 1192:Pink 1186:talk 1117:talk 1104:this 1015:Pink 1009:talk 986:talk 964:talk 929:talk 878:Pink 872:talk 839:talk 816:talk 737:talk 699:talk 668:talk 659:and 632:talk 565:talk 533:talk 514:talk 496:and 454:talk 442:Near 438:near 382:talk 317:talk 288:talk 230:talk 184:talk 158:talk 142:talk 121:talk 5737:, 4472:) 4144:The 3983:4) 3966:3) 3946:1) 3608:not 3418:to 3082:'s 2175:not 1949:any 1945:not 1674:" 1474:not 1462:Zeq 1440:Zeq 1166:), 1154:) ( 856:or 810:). 808:AGF 280:END 160:) 5848:, 5844:, 5822:, 5818:, 5796:, 5792:, 5768:) 5753:) 5708:) 5700:? 5689:) 5674:) 5659:) 5636:) 5617:) 5609:? 5575:) 5557:) 5520:) 5505:) 5483:) 5468:) 5453:) 5434:) 5412:) 5386:) 5364:-- 5357:) 5337:) 5272:) 5258:) 5190:) 5149:) 5076:-- 5066:) 5033:) 5018:) 4991:) 4977:) 4963:) 4949:) 4932:) 4854:) 4791:) 4776:) 4768:. 4751:UN 4732:) 4704:) 4690:) 4666:) 4651:) 4637:) 4621:) 4601:) 4593:-- 4572:) 4568:• 4535:) 4496:) 4456:) 4440:) 4419:) 4400:) 4386:) 4365:) 4346:) 4331:) 4307:) 4281:) 4236:) 4221:) 4155:) 4136:) 4119:) 4104:) 4085:) 4070:) 4030:) 3997:) 3940:) 3925:) 3906:) 3892:) 3865:) 3851:) 3836:) 3814:) 3739:) 3722:) 3707:) 3668:) 3660:. 3650:) 3627:- 3584:) 3567:) 3545:- 3516:) 3491:) 3473:) 3395:) 3367:) 3344:) 3310:) 3296:) 3282:) 3268:) 3246:PR 3234:) 3205:) 3191:) 3153:) 3119:) 3111:. 2986:) 2959:) 2936:) 2917:) 2883:) 2860:) 2842:) 2806:) 2776:) 2746:) 2719:) 2697:) 2674:) 2652:) 2622:) 2591:) 2571:) 2551:) 2543:-- 2531:) 2509:) 2492:) 2474:) 2470:) 2454:) 2429:) 2391:) 2377:) 2356:) 2338:) 2330:. 2319:) 2296:) 2277:) 2260:) 2245:) 2230:) 2201:- 2145:) 2137:-- 2115:) 2100:) 2062:) 2011:) 1960:) 1909:) 1890:) 1875:) 1852:- 1833:) 1819:) 1796:- 1783:) 1760:) 1745:) 1729:) 1688:) 1658:) 1654:• 1623:) 1589:) 1559:) 1524:) 1485:- 1446:) 1420:- 1404:) 1392:, 1367:) 1351:) 1329:) 1309:) 1292:) 1188:) 1150:, 1119:) 1011:) 988:) 966:) 931:) 874:) 841:) 818:) 739:) 701:) 670:) 662:. 634:) 561:- 535:) 516:) 456:) 446:in 413:- 384:) 348:- 319:) 290:) 232:) 186:) 144:) 123:) 94:→ 64:← 5834:" 5808:" 5782:" 5764:( 5749:( 5704:( 5685:( 5670:( 5655:( 5632:( 5613:( 5571:( 5553:( 5516:( 5501:( 5479:( 5464:( 5449:( 5430:( 5408:( 5382:( 5353:( 5333:( 5268:( 5254:( 5250:- 5186:( 5145:( 5062:( 5029:( 5014:( 4987:( 4973:( 4959:( 4945:( 4928:( 4850:( 4787:( 4772:( 4728:( 4700:( 4686:( 4682:- 4662:( 4647:( 4633:( 4617:( 4597:( 4564:( 4531:( 4492:( 4482:. 4468:( 4452:( 4436:( 4415:( 4396:( 4382:( 4361:( 4342:( 4327:( 4303:( 4277:( 4232:( 4217:( 4151:( 4132:( 4115:( 4100:( 4081:( 4066:( 4026:( 3993:( 3978:" 3936:( 3921:( 3902:( 3888:( 3861:( 3847:( 3832:( 3824:? 3810:( 3735:( 3718:( 3703:( 3664:( 3646:( 3580:( 3563:( 3512:( 3487:( 3469:( 3391:( 3363:( 3340:( 3306:( 3292:( 3278:( 3264:( 3230:( 3201:( 3187:( 3149:( 3115:( 2982:( 2955:( 2932:( 2913:( 2879:( 2856:( 2838:( 2817:[ 2802:( 2772:( 2742:( 2715:( 2693:( 2670:( 2648:( 2618:( 2587:( 2567:( 2547:( 2527:( 2505:( 2488:( 2466:( 2462:( 2450:( 2425:( 2387:( 2373:( 2352:( 2334:( 2315:( 2292:( 2273:( 2256:( 2241:( 2226:( 2182:. 2141:( 2111:( 2096:( 2058:( 2007:( 1956:( 1905:( 1886:( 1871:( 1829:( 1815:( 1779:( 1756:( 1741:( 1725:( 1684:( 1650:( 1619:( 1585:( 1555:( 1520:( 1442:( 1400:( 1363:( 1347:( 1325:( 1305:( 1288:( 1184:( 1164:1 1152:3 1148:2 1146:( 1115:( 1007:( 984:( 962:( 927:( 870:( 837:( 814:( 735:( 697:( 666:( 630:( 531:( 512:( 452:( 399:( 380:( 315:( 286:( 228:( 182:( 170:. 156:( 140:( 119:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index