317:
350:
432:
Fox News serves as an excellent case study about how an allegedly bias news body is still considered a reliable source. For the most part, the primary reasons I’ve found regarding it’s exclusion relate more to disliking it than NPOV policy:
285:
442:
certain kinds of information, that alone isn't enough by itself for something to be deleted. This may be coupled with (or replaced by) the unexplained claim that they feel that the information is ‘unencyclopedic’.
290:
312:
439:
162:
424:
397:
471:
307:
410:
The threshold for inclusion in
Knowledge (XXG) is verifiability, not truth—that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Knowledge (XXG) already
388:
This is the reason the
Neutral Point of View policy exists. News providers have a POV, but we report what they report from a neutral perspective, not exclude them.
102:
156:
118:
383:
have biases (in other words, all editors and all sources have a point of view) — what matters is how we combine them to create a neutral article.
371:
76:
263:
334:
472:
http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/archives/e-books/unpublished_manuscripts/bca_shantideva/translation/engaging_bodhisattva_01.html
400:(and conversely a biased source can be reliable). The important thing is that we should not be biased in our articles (see WP:NPOV).
69:
95:
57:
345:
145:
295:
280:
268:
205:
301:
184:
240:
112:
52:
189:
139:
63:
411:
178:
90:
81:
124:
365:
339:
225:
168:
252:
355:
257:
199:
194:
150:
322:
274:
427:
of what you may think of Fox News, they have news crews, editors, fact checkers and so forth.
230:
380:
360:
134:
215:
323:
Assume the good-faith assumption of assuming the assumption of good faith was in good faith
246:
220:
129:
46:
318:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
463:
379:
Neutrality requires views to be represented without bias. All editors and all
210:
351:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
396:
34:
And if others equal to myself in fortune happen to see them,
32:
The force of my belief may increase, even just for a moment,
286:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
21:
I have nothing to say here that was not said before,
30:
For, due to acquaintance with what is constructive,
25:
Yet, though I lack even the thought to help others,
419:Regarding Fox News, Editor Protonk contributes:
23:And I lack any skill in the crafting of verse.
8:
313:Assume the assumption of assuming good faith
36:Perhaps they might find them meaningful too.
291:Don't edit war over the colour of templates
135:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
27:I’ve composed this to familiarise my mind.
64:Core content policies: NPOV, V, & NOR
470:, 2-3 Chap. 1., Berzin, A. Translation.
456:
412:has been published by a reliable source
372:How_to_Win_Friends_and_Influence_People
7:
247:Knowledge (XXG) is not a bureaucracy
414:, not whether we think it is true.
308:Assume the assumption of good faith
14:
221:Ownership of articles (precious!)
16:This page is under construction.
398:a reliable source can be biased
1:
391:Editor Blueboar contributes:
157:Biographies of living persons
356:Don't call the kettle black
335:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
490:
438:...while some editors may
264:There is no common sense
468:Bodhisattvacharyavatara
446:
430:
417:
403:
386:
435:
421:
407:
393:
376:
70:Neutral point of view
96:No original research
346:No personal attacks
281:No angry mastodons
269:Reasonability Rule
206:Dispute resolution
302:Assume good faith
185:Gaming the system
481:
474:
461:
258:Use common sense
241:Ignore all rules
216:Abuse of process
47:The Five pillars
489:
488:
484:
483:
482:
480:
479:
478:
477:
462:
458:
454:
448:
405:Verifiability:
375:
296:Don't be a dick
238:
231:Logic fallacies
190:Policy shopping
176:
58:Talk Guidelines
44:
39:
35:
33:
31:
29:
28:
26:
24:
22:
18:
12:
11:
5:
487:
485:
476:
475:
455:
453:
450:
369:
368:
363:
358:
353:
348:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
299:
298:
293:
288:
283:
272:
271:
266:
250:
249:
237:
234:
203:
202:
200:Forum shopping
197:
192:
187:
175:
172:
166:
165:
154:
153:
148:
140:Words to avoid
122:
121:
110:
109:
108:
107:
106:
105:
93:
88:
87:
86:
85:
84:
79:
61:
60:
55:
43:
40:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
486:
473:
469:
465:
460:
457:
451:
449:
445:
444:
441:
434:
429:
428:
426:
420:
416:
415:
413:
406:
402:
401:
399:
392:
389:
385:
384:
382:
374:
373:
367:
364:
362:
359:
357:
354:
352:
349:
347:
344:
343:
342:
341:
337:
336:
324:
321:
320:
319:
316:
315:
314:
311:
310:
309:
306:
305:
304:
303:
297:
294:
292:
289:
287:
284:
282:
279:
278:
277:
276:
270:
267:
265:
262:
261:
260:
259:
255:
254:
248:
245:
244:
243:
242:
235:
233:
232:
228:
227:
223:
222:
218:
217:
213:
212:
208:
207:
201:
198:
196:
193:
191:
188:
186:
183:
182:
181:
180:
179:Wikilawyering
173:
171:
170:
164:
161:
160:
159:
158:
152:
149:
147:
146:Peacock terms
144:
143:
142:
141:
137:
136:
132:
131:
127:
126:
120:
117:
116:
115:
114:
104:
101:
100:
99:
98:
97:
94:
92:
91:Verifiability
89:
83:
80:
78:
75:
74:
73:
72:
71:
68:
67:
66:
65:
59:
56:
54:
51:
50:
49:
48:
41:
38:
37:
17:
467:
459:
447:
437:
436:
431:
423:
422:
418:
409:
408:
404:
395:
394:
390:
387:
378:
377:
370:
338:
333:
300:
273:
256:
251:
239:
236:The Solution
229:
224:
219:
214:
209:
204:
177:
167:
155:
151:Weasel words
138:
133:
128:
123:
111:
62:
45:
20:
19:
15:
163:Noticeboard
130:Attribution
119:Noticeboard
113:Reliability
103:Noticeboard
53:Policy List
464:Shantideva
452:References
425:Regardless
211:Mala fides
195:Canvassing
174:The Danger
125:Notability
366:Wikipeace
340:Etiquette
226:Vandalism
169:Consensus
42:The Means
361:Wikilove
275:Civility
82:Tutorial
440:dislike
381:sources
253:Apology
77:FAQ
466:,
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.