Talk:Haqqani network

2370:

listening to what they have to say and list the as ALLIES to a terrorist organization. You are now comparing Pakistan to Nazis. That's not "Neutral" AT ALL. Your whole analogy to Nazis is just wrong. Do you seriously have something against Pakistan? Answering your analogy, Nazi war crimes have been convicted internationally by the WHOLE WORLD, including German historians who documented it; not Mike Mullen and a handful of online resources... and even in a wikipedia article if Nazis denied it it will be mentioned that they have "Denied it", but that war is OVER and the Nazi party is not here anymore. As I have said before, if references contradict, we include BOTH in the text of the article. I have previously stated that I do not have any problem of you saying the Pakistan is allegedly an ally. Why are you so against Pakistan that "Pakistan's claims cannot be used"? I though you were neutral.

1240:, including its allies and who it is fighting against as well as where it is headquartered or based at. Their origins and past activities can be explained later on, this is normally how it's done everywhere. Your version is stupid because it confuses or misleads the readers into thinking that it is inside Afghanistan and that Pakistan has nothing to do with them. Waziristan is not a country, it is the name of a frontier region of Pakistan and that needs to be indicated. There are 100s of sources that say that the group is inside Pakistan and not in Afghanistan. The group is Afghan-led but many of its members or followers are Pakistanis. On the right are a couple of Pakistani terrorists captured inside Afghanistan this year, there are many more if you want to see. I'm not the ignorant one and I'm not ignoring anything. This article is about 2001-present insurgents, NOT about 1576:

you pick the Y). It doesn't require a genius to figure out that since 1978 to present-day Pakistan served as the main country for these so called religious fighters (Mujahideen, Taliban, al-Qaida, insurgents...) to use for crossing over into Afghanistan. In pre-2001, Afghanistan only had 1-day-a-week (1 flight) service from Dubai to Kandahar. There was no other flight service whatsoever and the people in that 1 weekly flight were mostly wealthy Afghans from abroad who went to visit families. The point is that everything came to Afghanistan from Pakistan in those years, all the other neighbors of Afghanistan had their borders closed. Btw, I didn't call you anything. I'm stating that generally speaking all Pakistanis do not like Afghans today and I'm not wrong about this. Also, it doesn't take a genius to figure out what you are trying to do here.--

2307:

article text". You are using your references to show that Pakistan is an ally, I am showing you references in which they deny it. Hence, what is the fact? According to you, its that Pakistan is an ally is the fact because 'Pakistan can't be trusted'. In wikipedia, in these cases we include BOTH sides of the story, wikipedia is an ENCYLOPEDIA, not a mirror of views of what you would like to see. You may include ALL the references you have used in that section, but do not present Paksitan as an ally when they have denied it. If I call you a thief and you deny it I do not present it as FACT and say oh well you're lying. Different views are presented on whether Pakistan is an ally or not and are hence DISCUSSED in the article text in the section I have linked you.

508: 1443:

Afghans, Pakistanis, and probably other nationals. You lost the friendly debate here and decided to go personal with me. This is pathetic and foolish. I have nothing against Pakistan or any other country, to me Pakistan is another sorry ass poor begger nation like Afghanistan and many others. The fact is I'm trying to correct information in Knowledge that stupid retards add for their personal agendas and pleasures. Since you and I cannot agree here why don't you just leave the intro for a 3rd party (someone who is neutral and not a Pakistani or an Afghan) to fix it. I really don't even like to talk with people like you because you have personal issues with people of other countries, especially Afghans.--

751: 730: 1205:

occupation of Afghanistan as local resistance members. They recieved funding and aid from Pakistan and U.S.A., but they were local commanders. They served in Afghanistan's government during the Taliban era and as the article itself says, "foreign jihadists recognized the network as a distinct entity as early as 1994" in Afghanistan. Your argument that "Just because its leader is originally from Afghanistan it doesn't mean that all of the insurgents are Afghans" is again contradictory because the Haqqani group is essentially an allied branch of the

1544:. You are pretty much also owning up to the fact that you are a banned sockpuppet who is abusing his editing restrictions, so it is less than debatable whether you should even be here in the first place. So far, nearly all your replies have been talk and nothing else. You have not adequately challenged the references I added in the article that clearly state the group originated in Afghanistan or that it fled from Afghanistan post-2001. Your modified "description" above also smacks of 492: 2236:. However, you insist on marking Pakistan as ALLIED to them in the infobox even when Pakistan has denied it. That's POV editing since both sides stories are documented in the article. Pakistan support for the network is written, and Pakistan's denial is also written. You seem to dismiss Pakistan's denial on the basis they can't be trusted. Why? Both points of views are valid and should be in an encyclopedia. You may include Pakistan as an 104: 83: 114: 646: 2151:

We do not favor one side over the other here. We do not discriminate against a group of people. We do not deny the holocaust nor do we deny anyone (Pakistan, etc..) point of view. Pakistan allegation is already described in the article. YOU are adamant on classifying them as allies, even though they have denied it and dismiss it on basis that they can't be trusted. Take a moment and reflect on what you just wrote.

625: 536: 656: 275: 377: 2406:. Comment on content, not on a contributor. This is a serious Knowledge policy offense to accuse me of being a sponsored by Pakistan. I have no relationship to Pakistan whatsoever. I never compared you to a Nazi either. Please refrain from this kind of accusations on wikipedia. Since you seem to be going after me now and not the Knowledge content, it seems we are done here. Have a good day. 52: 449: 438: 427: 416: 2303:

call you out on your double standard. When it comes to the quote I referenced by Mike Mullen who was the former Joint Chiefs of Staff, you automatically just call it "one alleged claim" and dismiss it but when it comes to the information you put about "Pakistan denies it" all of a sudden it is wrong for me to "dismiss it"?- Mountain157(talk) 5:11 23 December 2018

219: 192: 335: 307: 405: 2341:

So just based on "Pakistan denying something" we have to give them preferable treatment. And the references clearly contradict the claims by Pakistan if you take a look at it. That's the reason why Pakistan's claims CANNOT BE USED as an excuse to delete information about Pakistan being an ally of the

1373:

show that you are 95% incorrect and that you clearly lack knowledge of this subject. Haqqani was serving in the Taliban government of Afghanistan in 1996. Following the American invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, Haqqani like many other local Taliban insurgents and the al-Qaeda movement in Afghanistan,

2369:

No one is deleting any information from the text. Information about Pakistan having links with Haqqani network is ALREADY in the article, it is discussed, cited, and have its own section in the whole article. YOU are coming in and outright saying that Pakistan is an ally and we shouldn't even bother

2150:

Do you have anything against Pakistan that you are willing not to trust what they say? Whoa, you're even comparing Pakistan to a thief. Please take a moment and try to comprehend what you're saying. This is Knowledge, it's a 💕. If you have strong views against Pakistan then you should start a blog.

1897:

You don't get it , do you? How does CIA/ISI having contacts with the Haqqani network make them Pakistani? The Haqqani family originates from Afghanistan. They are an Afghan family, who became notable after the Soviet war in Afghanistan. Migrating to another country does not change their nationality.

1221:

of Afghanistan and the overthrow of the local Taliban government. Meaning that they've been in the tribal region permanently only since 2001, although the group's existence and origin predates that year. I am not sure if it is ignorance or you're not bothering to read the whole article, but the fact

1204:

in Afghanistan and that's what all reliable sources will tell you. Your whole argument is contradictory because saying that the group has links to Pakistan and is currently based there is different from saying where the group originates. For your own information, the Haqqanis arose during the Soviet

2398:

I have to call you out on your second double standard. You said that "You are now comparing Pakistan to Nazis. That's not "Neutral" AT ALL", but you yourself tried to compare me to Nazis by saying, "We do not deny the Holocaust, nor do we deny anyone(Pakistan,e.t.c)point of view". Also I must ask,

1991:

Knowledge NPOV states "All encyclopedic content on Knowledge must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic."

1841:

p20, not Afghanistan. They only joined with the Taliban after the fall of Kabul. They are nothing more than a proxy for Pakistan. Please do not try and rewrite history everywhere you edit, it is most annoying. Now spare me your poor attempts at sarcasm and for once, just once maybe you can actually

1812:

The group originated in Afghanistan, is made up of Afghans, has political roots in Afghanistan, and was based in Afghanistan pre-2001. Pakistan does not even come into the equation, they fled from Afghanistan and regrouped in the tribal frontier of Pakistan after US invaded Afghanistan. That is the

1442:

You are repeating the same usual Pakistani nationalist / anti-Afghanistan nonsense that we hear from almost every Pakistani these days. The Haqqanis were not insurgents during the Taliban period (pre-2001), this article is about an insurgent group who follow the Haqqani leaders. They are made up of

1347:

already describe the group's current status and activites by stating that it is affiliated with the Afghan Taliban and closely tied to al-Qaeda. It also states that it is believed to be based in the Waziristan tribal region and that it is launching attacks inside Afghanistan. So what's all the fuss

2433:. Oh and by the way its funny how early on you went and vandalised my page about "edit warring" and the "3 revert rule" when you were actually the one who broke the 3 revert rule. Sounds like Hypocrisy. For future reference, do not any of these things again.- Mountain157(talk) 9:39 24 December 2018 2264:

Stop making baseless claims that I am "POV editing because I support one side of the story". Simply put, the evidence from the references shows that Pakistan is an ally of the Haqqani Network. Like for example in the U.S Defense intelligence PDF, the headquarters of the Haqqani Network is in Miram

1983:

Knowledge Original research states that: "Any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by a reliable source. Material for which no reliable source can be found is considered original research. The only way you can show your edit is not original research is to cite a

1979:

Haqqani network secret safe havens, trade ties, and real estate holdings in Pakistan and UAE does not mean that those two countries are ALLIED to Haqqani network. In matter of fact, the same source you use states that Pakistan "denies" allying with Haqqani network. A+B =/= C. Your edit is original

1575:

and the things you say about me proves that you are a lurker and stalking me. You are once again focusing and arguing on the origins of the leaders of this insurgent group after I explained that this is irrelevant for the lead. And, your are "cherry-picking" sources (i.e. 100s say X and 3 say Y...

1305:

militants in Afghanistan (I'm sure that it is quite common the other way around too), so it'd be nice if you get rid of your obession with Pakistan everywhere and display some neutrality while editing Knowledge; this includes trying to adorn almost every Afghanistan-related article (including this

2302:

Facts are facts and that is why Pakistan must be listed in the main box as an ally of the Haqqani Network. You like to keep alleging that "I don't trust it" but in reality it is you who is POV editing from an uneutral point of view because you claim mine to be violating neutrality. I have to also

2240:

supporter, but don't dismiss one side of the story.The article already talked about the alleged support but you seem to go out of your way, to outright dismiss what Pakistan has to say. If A said something and B said something, we don't include A only because we like it, we include BOTH, which is

2011:

Thank you for your response. You do realize that one alleged claim does not mean that Pakistan is ALLIED to Haqqani network. Do not use it out of context to add that the Pakistan as a WHOLE country as outright allies to haqqani network. You may include the quote you have referenced in the article

2007:

I have not done any such POV editing as you have claimed, rather you are the one who has some sort of bias in favor of Pakistan and the UAE. You also cited the Knowledge policy about a "reliable published source". So you consider Stanford University to not be a reliable published source? Also the

1248:

from the 1980s. I am not sure if it is ignorance or you're not bothering to accept that this is an anti-NATO-Afghan terrorist insurgent group based inside Pakistan and launching attacks inside Afghanistan. What's the point of trying to cover up information about Pakistan when the CIA have 100s of

2306:

I am against your edit, I am not including any new information, please elaborate on how am I POV pushing? How am I being baised if I am not even including content at all?? I did not dismiss your Mike Mullen reference, in matter of fact I said "You may include the quote you have referenced in the

2034:

It is not just one alleged claim. There are also 2 parts that mention the Haqqani network being tied to the Pakistani ISI along with other groups such as Al-Qaeda. Oh and along with that there are other sources of information that backs the fact that Pakistan supports and provides refuge for the

1127:

wants to reject the idea that the group originated long back in Soviet-era Afghanistan or that its leadership hails from a place in southeast Afghanistan. He keeps stressing the Haqqani's alleged links to Pakistan (or its current base there after they fled Afghanistan in 2001) in the lead, and I

2193:

I hold a neutral position. I have done the research and presented the evidence that the Pakistani ISI has involvement with the Haqqani Network and helping them in attacks on U.S, Afghan and Indian targets as per what Stanford University said. Well let me ask you this too, Why are you so adamant

2123:

Those articles are based off of quotes of what Pakistan claims not based on any factual study or research. Pakistan always denies that they have any ties with anything. So you are saying we have to trust what PAKISTAN SAYS? No that can't happen. That itself shows that you are biased in favor of

1535:

I'm going personal? Really? I'd rather not take lectures on that from you, since I have already seen much more of your personal allegations against others in various places in Knowledge. In that reply of yours above, you just labelled me an anti-Afghan Pakistani nationalist, called me a "stupid

1374:

fled to Pakistan's bordering areas and regrouped to fight the coalition forces, so I am completely dumbstruck in confusion where the heck you came up with this 1979 refugees thing. All this is precisely what is mentioned in the article. Not sure what part of this you are not understanding.

1813:

only link. Now spare us and this article from your lack of knowledge about this topic. But anyway, if your logic is to be applied, reliable sources state that they were patronised by the CIA during the 1980s... so using your twisted logic, that makes them an American group :o)

557: 2271:

Again, you are free to mention that there is an alleged relationship between Pakistan and Haqqani network and describe all the things you have quoted and the references you have used. I am not dismissing your sources. However, do not dismiss Pakistan's denial because

2265:

Shah, North Waziristan where the training facilities of the Haqqani Network are funded and supported by the Pakistani ISI. The PDF also mentions that "All activities at these Haqqani-affiliated training centers are monitored by an ISI general named Asif Punjabi".

1360:

from the 1980s." Again, you are wrong. The Haqqani network existed before 2001 and was based in Afghanistan; people had heard of the name decades back. You say that I am "5% correct because the leaders have been living in Pakistan since at least 1979 among the

2008:

Stanford article has said "In 2011, Adm. Mike Mullen, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called Haqqani Network a "veritable arm" of Pakistan's premier intelligence agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence".- Mountain 157 10:32, 23 December 2018

1556:

to support the group's origin in Afghanistan and the fact that it has been in the tribal regions following 2001. It doesn't require a genius to figure out where the Taliban, al-Qaeda and insurgent groups of nearly every species were located before 2001.

1984:

reliable published source that contains the same material. Even with well-sourced material, if you use it out of context, or to reach or imply a conclusion not directly and explicitly supported by the source, you are engaging in original research"

836:{{Infobox militant organization |name =Haqqani Network |Flag = |leader =] |dates = |area = ]-] |ideology = |allies =] |opponents =] |status = Operational |size=15,000<ref: --> 1592:

I'm still having a hard time figuring out what is actually being disputed here. It seems to me that the argument is over the semantics of the lede rather than anything factual. The proposed revision, however, does seem to veer more towards

27:

policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or

515: 321: 284: 202: 2428:

I am aware of what you were doing.You were going through my account contributions list and then in a targeted way undoing things that I had put. Not only is that a nasty and prejudiced thing to do but also a blatant violation of the

1167:

border into Afghanistan and fought with Soviet and Afghan forces, the same way they are fighting with NATO-Afghan forces today. All the reliable sources say that the Haqqani network is operating from Pakistan and the US is using

2342:

Haqqani Network. Let me get this straight, based on your logic, the Nazis involved in War crimes at Nuremberg should not be paired with their actions simply because they have "denied it"?- Mountain157(talk) 5:40 23 December 2018

1306:

page as I can imply from Rdavi404's comment above) with that favourite Zar Ajam photo of yours. Secondly, please use phrases like "alleged" and "believed to be based in...." whenever you refer to the group's bases in Pakistan (

1865:

I would be in support of removing the label "Afghan" from the article's first sentence since someone can read the article and make his or her own determination of nationalities, but in no way should "Afghan" be replaced by

499: 317: 2245:

states. You describing Pakistan as can't be trusted and comparing them to a thief is no way anywhere near "neutral". Don't edit the stable article because you support one side of the story, thats calling POV pushing.

1880:

I never said it should be replaced with Pakistani, however given where they were founded, who trained, armed and supported them to this day means they are not an Afghan group. So I fully agree with your suggestion.

1715:

That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Founded in Pakistan, trained in Pakistan, paid for by Pakistan, Intel from Pakistan, weapons from Pakistan. Explain with sources how this group is not a Pakistani proxy?

925:{{Infobox militant organization |name = |logo = |caption = |dates = |leader = |motives = |area = |ideology = |crimes = |attacks = |status = |size = |revenue = |financing= }} 1618:

Anaylst believe pakistan is also hedgeing its bets in the event the United States leaves Afghanistan, Pakistans wants to have a working realationship with both any US backed goverment and any taliban goverment

1146:

The way the intro is written is misleading. It is trying to explain that the insurgent group is inside Afghanistan when it really is inside Pakistan. Mar4d, you're talking about the 1980s multi-national

808: 265: 2035:

Haqqani Network such as . The article mentions specifically that the information is from the "Country Reports on Terrorism" by the U.S State Department.- Mountain157(talk) 12:20 23 December 2018

2551: 2576: 1677:

This group operate out of Pakistan, they are funded by Pakistan, they receive intel from Pakistan, their recruits come from Pakistn. Please explain how they are an Afghan insurgent group?

230:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 1200:

The lead already mentions that the group is based in Waziristan. Let's make one thing clear - the lead is not stating that the group is based in Afghanistan. What it's saying is that it

231: 1796:

I want a reliable source which says this group are an Afghan group. All the sources I see say they were founded in Pakistan and are trained, armed and are a proxy army for Pakistan.

2571: 945:

I noticed that too. The ally and opposition paramaters don't exist in the template which is quite strange, considering that the template's name is "infobox militant organisation".

2093:. Its has been suggested, never confirmed. Don't confirm it on your own views here in wikipedia by stating Pakistan is allied with Haqqani network. Knowledge does not take sides. 2566: 37: 2232:

I am not arguing against Pakistan ISI - Haqqani links. They are already WRITTEN in the article, extensively. There is a WHOLE paragraph written there. Here let me link you

226: 197: 390: 347: 2561: 2541: 289: 2224: 1352:

to establish the fact that the Haqqani network is from Afghanistan and if you don't like it, too bad. You claim that this article "is about 2001-present, NOT about

2531: 607: 255: 2586: 597: 376: 1974: 1966: 2492: 833:

Not all of the fields for the infobox are displayed on the article. The "Militant Organization" template does not contain some of the fields. As it is now:

2546: 2516: 174: 164: 1186:

It's very ridiculous to read the whole intro and not find a mention that this insurgent group is inside Pakistan. If you don't call this POV then what is?--

2591: 976: 2556: 2147:

Your logic sounds kind of ridiculous. So a thief automatically is not a thief just because the thief denies it?- Mountain157(talk) 1:08 23 December 2018

1764:"Jalaluddin Haqqani's network has existed in Pakistan since the Soviet era and also extends throughout the Pashtun areas of Afghanistan and into Kabul." 1348:

about? As far as I can understand, the part that the group originates from southeast Afghanistan is what is irking you. I'm sorry, but there are ample

2601: 2536: 2521: 712: 702: 2616: 798: 573: 2526: 1047: 23: 2266: 2226: 1057: 2606: 2581: 2194:

against listing Pakistan as an ally of the Haqqani Network? By the way here are references showing that Pakistan supports the Haqqani Network:

2079: 1833:

That is so wrong it is actually quite hilarious. Jalalludin Haqqani left Afghanistan and lived in exile in Pakistan during Daoud's presidency.

919: 507: 342: 312: 140: 2621: 2511: 1253:, but that is only 5% correct because the Haqqani leaders have been living in or using Pakistan since at least 1979 in their war against the 351: 2077: 1992:

you are engaging in a NPOV edit since you are favoring one source than others. I hope this familiarize you more with Knowledge policies.

2399:

are you state Sponsored by the Pakistani Government to go around deleting sourced information.- Mountain157(talk) 7:01 23 December 2018

2214: 678: 564: 541: 2596: 774: 1172:

to kill its members. Just because its leader is originally from Afghanistan it doesn't mean that all of the insurgents are Afghans.--

2611: 2050: 1859: 136: 127: 88: 1502:

of Pakistan, which is fighting alongside the Taliban and al Qaeda against NATO-Afghan forces inside Afghanistan. Headed by Maulvi

1108:

A POV dispute banner and an "expert requested" banner has been added to the top of the article. What exactly is under dispute?--

1489:

This is the most stupid leading sentence I have ever come across in an encyclopedia. It is all POV. It should start like this:

1089: 1732:

Given that the whole article depicts the HN as originating from Afghanistan but currently exiled in Pakistan, I would say that

769:-related subjects on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the 750: 729: 135:-related subjects on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the 1750:

It is no fault of mine if the article is poorly written. I asked about a specific edit, it is that which requires a response.

1077: 1985: 1954: 1639: 1514:. Members or followers of the group are local Afghan and Pakistani tribal men but some foreign nationals may also be present. 669: 630: 1307: 1037: 961:

If it is possible the info box should definitely be edited to include that info. Seeing as it is quite relevant to the page.

2493:

https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2018/09/pakistan-continues-to-harbor-taliban-including-al-qaeda-linked-haqqanis.php

2403: 1755: 1265:, Pakistan served as the base for the multi-national Mujahideens since around 1978 of which the Haqqanis were a part of.-- 770: 761: 735: 1692:

Just like LTTE was a Sri Lankan group rather than an Indian, TTP is a Pakistani group rather than Afghani or American. --

1096: 1022: 63: 1416:

On a side note, it already seems clear to me that you are yet another account of the internationally-famous sockmaster

2276:

don't trust it. Knowledge is not about if YOU trust it or not. YOU are supporting one side of the story if you do so.

1249:

drones flying over that country everyday and blowing up suspected insurgent hideouts. You also claimed that the group

2075: 1070: 1886: 1847: 1801: 1773: 1721: 1682: 1353: 1241: 1169: 2073: 2012:

text. Please include all reliable views on the subject, not ones you cherry pick to support your point of view.

1064: 36:. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see 1751: 928:

So the question is do we use another template, edit the militant organization template, or something else? --

2216: 1662: 1552:

attempt to deliberately tamper with information and remove Afghanistan from the lead, even though there are

346:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 29: 1969: 1428:. I thought you would have been aware by now of some of your priorities and restrictions on editing here. 1156: 2222: 2212: 2464: 2453: 2449: 2411: 2375: 2312: 2281: 2251: 2218: 2156: 2098: 2046: 2017: 1997: 69: 1128:

presume he wants that fact to overlook any mention of the group's instrumental role in Afghan history.

2038: 1882: 1843: 1797: 1769: 1717: 1678: 1627: 1581: 1525: 1448: 1270: 1191: 1177: 966: 1858:

The only source I have found so far to even come close to labeling them as Pakistani is in the very

51: 1362: 1258: 1060: 1160: 677:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

572:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2220: 1871: 1787: 1741: 1635: 1602: 1507: 1503: 1113: 1000: 984: 933: 906: 856: 119: 1963:

You have added Pakistan and UAE as allied to Haqqani network using the following references:

1023:

Sirajuddin Haqqani dares US to attack N Waziristan, By Reuters, Published: September 24, 2011

2460: 2407: 2371: 2308: 2277: 2247: 2152: 2094: 2042: 2013: 1993: 1948: 1733: 491: 2242: 2233: 1907: 1862:. It describes the network as "an Afghan and Pakistani insurgent group" on pages 1 and 7. 1822: 1577: 1562: 1541: 1521: 1444: 1433: 1379: 1366: 1266: 1262: 1227: 1187: 1173: 1133: 1124: 975:

That seems like a reasonable suggestion. I'm going to ask about adding new parameters on

962: 950: 661: 995:

I just changed the infobox template to "war faction" since it allows for those fields.--

1958: 1421: 1417: 1311: 1206: 766: 2505: 1867: 1783: 1737: 1693: 1631: 1598: 1549: 1537: 1109: 996: 980: 929: 569: 2081:. Pakistan has denied it. There is a whole section in the article which talks about 2457: 1594: 1553: 1545: 1370: 1349: 1214: 103: 82: 2430: 1536:

retard", and possibly everything you could come up in your colorful language. See

1736:

of finding evidence of their being exclusively a Pakistani group lies with you.--

1571:

First, you should stop being obsessed with me, and stop following me like a fly,

1953:, here I will attempt to show you why your edits are violating wikipedia policy 1511: 1210: 1164: 866: 556: 535: 132: 1209:

and the Haqqanis themselves have on various occassions stated that they follow

645: 624: 274: 1900: 1815: 1558: 1496: 1429: 1375: 1357: 1245: 1223: 1148: 1129: 946: 651: 109: 1918:

Nobody is taking of nationality, please catch up. 17:14, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

1425: 1098:

Kunar police chief, Brig. Gen. Mohammad Naziri said the dead militants were

1163:), the same way they are being trained today in Pakistan. They crossed the 1088: 1069: 1036: 2402:

Since I believe you are a new user, I will assume good faith. Please read

1663:

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-pakistan-hedges-bets-ties-militants-212927160

1043: 870: 674: 2468: 2415: 2379: 2316: 2285: 2255: 2160: 2102: 2054: 2021: 2001: 1913: 1890: 1875: 1851: 1828: 1805: 1791: 1777: 1759: 1745: 1725: 1710: 1686: 1643: 1606: 1585: 1566: 1529: 1452: 1437: 1383: 1308:‘No sanctuaries in Pakistan’: Haqqani network shifts base to Afghanistan 1274: 1231: 1195: 1181: 1137: 1117: 1004: 988: 970: 954: 937: 1302: 896: 1839:

Making Sense of Proxy Wars: States, Surrogates & the Use of Force

1301:

First of all, this article and discussion is not about Pakistan-born

1222:

that the Haqqani network is an Afghan insurgent group is undisputed.

1495:

The Haqqani Network is an insurgent group that is based inside the

334: 306: 218: 191: 1499: 1254: 45: 15: 1837:

p187. That is were he founded his group, with Pakistani help

1520:

I think this is a very accurate description and reads well.--

1213:, the head of the Afghanistan Taliban, as their leader. All 506: 490: 375: 273: 773:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 139:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 1572: 1091:

File:Two captured suicide bombers in Kunar province.jpg

2431:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Harassment)policy

841:...which shows up as the box on the right -----: --> 673:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 568:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 388:

This article has been checked against the following

2124:

Pakistan.- Mountain157(talk) 12:57 23 December 2018

1479:insurgent group originating in Afghanistan that is 1039:

File:Zar Ajam from North Waziristan in Pakistan.jpg

902: 892: 884: 876: 862: 852: 847: 473: 387: 240:Knowledge:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography 2552:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles 1251:fled to Pakistan after the U.S.-led 2001 invasion 1219:fled to Pakistan after the U.S.-led 2001 invasion 243:Template:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography 2577:South Asian military history task force articles 1236:The first sentence should describe the group's 2572:C-Class South Asian military history articles 8: 1072:File:Saifullah of Pakistan in July 2011.jpg 1065:Haqqani network threatens attacks on judges 977:Template_talk:Infobox_militant_organization 2567:Asian military history task force articles 2268:- Mountain157(talk) 3:41 23 December 2018 2228:- Mountain157(talk) 2:46 23 December 2018 2036: 1623:the above quote should be in the article 1510:, the group operates on both sides of the 844: 724: 619: 530: 470: 384: 301: 186: 77: 32:contentious material about living persons 2448:I have responded in your talk page here: 2072:Here are references which contradict you: 1151:fighters, who were assembled and trained 1842:cite some sources for your little rant. 340:This article is within the scope of the 227:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography 2562:C-Class Asian military history articles 2542:Low-importance Organized crime articles 2485: 1655: 1015: 726: 621: 532: 516:South Asian military history task force 303: 188: 79: 49: 1081:Pakistan's tribal region of Waziristan 360:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history 350:. To use this banner, please see the 2532:Low-importance Crime-related articles 1782:What is your specific edit request?-- 1257:Soviet-backed Afghan government. See 1159:with fundings from USA (go to "6:29" 363:Template:WikiProject Military history 7: 2587:Low-importance organization articles 2243:Alleged Pakistan-Haqqani involvement 2234:Alleged Pakistan-Haqqani involvement 1835:Historical Dictionary of Afghanistan 765:, a project to maintain and expand 667:This article is within the scope of 562:This article is within the scope of 224:This article is within the scope of 131:, a project to maintain and expand 125:This article is within the scope of 2547:Organized crime task force articles 2517:Low-importance Afghanistan articles 1369:." In reply, all I can say is that 582:Knowledge:WikiProject Organizations 68:It is of interest to the following 2592:WikiProject Organizations articles 585:Template:WikiProject Organizations 14: 2557:C-Class military history articles 500:Asian military history task force 149:Knowledge:WikiProject Afghanistan 2602:Low-importance Pakistan articles 2537:C-Class Organized crime articles 2522:WikiProject Afghanistan articles 1766:Crime-Terror Nexus in South Asia 749: 728: 654: 644: 623: 555: 534: 447: 436: 425: 414: 403: 333: 305: 217: 190: 152:Template:WikiProject Afghanistan 112: 102: 81: 50: 2617:Low-importance Pashtun articles 2456:before you accuse other users. 803:This article has been rated as 707:This article has been rated as 602:This article has been rated as 260:This article has been rated as 169:This article has been rated as 2527:C-Class Crime-related articles 1217:will point out that the group 687:Knowledge:WikiProject Pakistan 285:the Organized crime task force 1: 2607:WikiProject Pakistan articles 2582:C-Class organization articles 2469:15:47, 24 December 2018 (UTC) 2416:00:23, 24 December 2018 (UTC) 2404:Knowledge:No personal attacks 2380:22:58, 23 December 2018 (UTC) 2317:22:27, 23 December 2018 (UTC) 2286:21:38, 23 December 2018 (UTC) 2256:20:07, 23 December 2018 (UTC) 2161:18:44, 23 December 2018 (UTC) 2103:17:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC) 2083:Alleged Pakistani involvement 2055:17:20, 23 December 2018 (UTC) 2022:15:59, 23 December 2018 (UTC) 2002:04:46, 23 December 2018 (UTC) 1238:current status and activities 1005:20:37, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 783:Knowledge:WikiProject Pashtun 690:Template:WikiProject Pakistan 681:and see a list of open tasks. 576:and see a list of open tasks. 282:This article is supported by 234:and see a list of open tasks. 24:biographies of living persons 2622:WikiProject Pashtun articles 2512:C-Class Afghanistan articles 2452:. Familiarize yourself with 2241:exactly what the section of 1644:23:35, 21 October 2011 (UTC) 1607:16:53, 16 October 2011 (UTC) 1586:00:37, 16 October 2011 (UTC) 1567:23:34, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 1530:22:36, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 1453:18:50, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 1438:06:26, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 1384:06:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 1275:04:39, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 1232:00:16, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 1196:23:27, 14 October 2011 (UTC) 1182:23:22, 14 October 2011 (UTC) 1138:23:07, 14 October 2011 (UTC) 1118:20:05, 14 October 2011 (UTC) 989:17:05, 16 October 2011 (UTC) 971:00:23, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 955:23:08, 14 October 2011 (UTC) 938:19:25, 14 October 2011 (UTC) 786:Template:WikiProject Pashtun 343:Military history WikiProject 237:Crime and Criminal Biography 198:Crime and Criminal Biography 1914:12:15, 17 August 2012 (UTC) 1891:19:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC) 1876:19:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC) 1852:19:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC) 1829:16:56, 16 August 2012 (UTC) 1806:15:44, 16 August 2012 (UTC) 1792:14:27, 16 August 2012 (UTC) 1778:14:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC) 1760:13:56, 16 August 2012 (UTC) 1746:13:40, 16 August 2012 (UTC) 1726:12:35, 16 August 2012 (UTC) 1711:12:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC) 1687:07:44, 16 August 2012 (UTC) 1512:Afghanistan-Pakistan border 34:must be removed immediately 2638: 1475:The Haqqani Network is an 1049:But consider that Ajam, a 713:project's importance scale 608:project's importance scale 408:Referencing and citation: 266:project's importance scale 175:project's importance scale 2597:C-Class Pakistan articles 1354:Soviet war in Afghanistan 1242:Soviet war in Afghanistan 1170:drone attacks in Pakistan 1079:Saifullah, a resident of 802: 744: 706: 639: 601: 565:WikiProject Organizations 550: 514: 498: 469: 366:military history articles 328: 281: 259: 212: 168: 97: 76: 2612:C-Class Pashtun articles 2085:. Alleged does not mean 1860:first ref on the article 1986:WP:No original research 1955:WP:No original research 1548:and is clearly another 1485:has strong affiliations 474:Associated task forces: 419:Coverage and accuracy: 128:WikiProject Afghanistan 1621: 1105: 1086: 1067: 511: 495: 452:Supporting materials: 380: 278: 246:Crime-related articles 58:This article is rated 2450:User talk:Mountain157 1616: 1500:fronier tribal region 1483:with the Taliban and 1094: 1075: 1053:from North Waziristan 1042: 588:organization articles 510: 494: 379: 277: 670:WikiProject Pakistan 155:Afghanistan articles 1752:Nihil Novi Sub Sole 1506:along with his son 1363:Afghans in Pakistan 1310:) in the spirit of 1259:Afghans in Pakistan 1157:Pakistan's military 762:WikiProject Pashtun 441:Grammar and style: 394:for B-class status: 2089:and does not mean 1883:Facts, not fiction 1844:Facts, not fiction 1798:Facts, not fiction 1770:Facts, not fiction 1718:Facts, not fiction 1679:Facts, not fiction 1508:Sirajuddin Haqqani 1504:Jalaluddin Haqqani 1343:Thirdly, the lead 1106: 1087: 1068: 1046:(video included): 922:has these fields: 857:Jalaluddin Haqqani 512: 496: 381: 348:list of open tasks 279: 120:Afghanistan portal 64:content assessment 2057: 2041:comment added by 1941:Original Research 1647: 1630:comment added by 1546:original research 1161:of this CNN video 912: 911: 823: 822: 819: 818: 815: 814: 723: 722: 719: 718: 693:Pakistan articles 618: 617: 614: 613: 529: 528: 525: 524: 521: 520: 465: 464: 410:criterion not met 352:full instructions 300: 299: 296: 295: 185: 184: 181: 180: 44: 43: 2629: 2495: 2490: 1952: 1910: 1903: 1825: 1818: 1708: 1703: 1698: 1665: 1660: 1646: 1624: 1371:reliable sources 1092: 1073: 1040: 1025: 1020: 845: 838:|accessdate= }} 829:Infobox problems 809:importance scale 791: 790: 789:Pashtun articles 787: 784: 781: 753: 746: 745: 740: 732: 725: 695: 694: 691: 688: 685: 664: 659: 658: 657: 648: 641: 640: 635: 627: 620: 590: 589: 586: 583: 580: 559: 552: 551: 546: 538: 531: 481: 471: 455: 451: 450: 444: 440: 439: 433: 429: 428: 422: 418: 417: 411: 407: 406: 385: 368: 367: 364: 361: 358: 357:Military history 337: 330: 329: 324: 313:Military history 309: 302: 248: 247: 244: 241: 238: 221: 214: 213: 208: 205: 194: 187: 157: 156: 153: 150: 147: 122: 117: 116: 115: 106: 99: 98: 93: 85: 78: 61: 55: 54: 46: 38:this noticeboard 16: 2637: 2636: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2491: 2487: 1946: 1943: 1908: 1901: 1823: 1816: 1704: 1699: 1694: 1675: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1661: 1657: 1625: 1615: 1367:Afghan refugees 1263:Afghan refugees 1153:inside Pakistan 1125:User:Jorge Koli 1090: 1071: 1038: 1035: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1021: 1017: 848:Haqqani Network 831: 788: 785: 782: 779: 778: 757:Haqqani network 738: 692: 689: 686: 683: 682: 662:Pakistan portal 660: 655: 653: 633: 587: 584: 581: 578: 577: 544: 479: 453: 448: 442: 437: 431: 426: 420: 415: 409: 404: 365: 362: 359: 356: 355: 315: 245: 242: 239: 236: 235: 206: 203:Organized crime 200: 154: 151: 148: 145: 144: 118: 113: 111: 91: 62:on Knowledge's 59: 12: 11: 5: 2635: 2633: 2625: 2624: 2619: 2614: 2609: 2604: 2599: 2594: 2589: 2584: 2579: 2574: 2569: 2564: 2559: 2554: 2549: 2544: 2539: 2534: 2529: 2524: 2519: 2514: 2504: 2503: 2497: 2496: 2484: 2483: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2454:WP:Harrassment 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2429:WP:Harassment( 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2259: 2258: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 1942: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1866:"Pakistani."-- 1863: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1762: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1674: 1673:Afghan or not? 1671: 1667: 1666: 1654: 1653: 1649: 1614: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1518: 1517: 1487:with al-Qaeda. 1481:closely allied 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1422:User:NisarKand 1418:User:Lagoo sab 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1207:Afghan Taliban 1141: 1140: 1059: 1056: 1034: 1031: 1027: 1026: 1014: 1013: 1009: 1008: 1007: 993: 992: 991: 959: 958: 957: 927: 926: 924: 923: 915: 914: 910: 909: 904: 900: 899: 894: 890: 889: 886: 882: 881: 878: 874: 873: 864: 863:Active regions 860: 859: 854: 850: 849: 842: 840: 839: 835: 834: 830: 827: 825: 821: 820: 817: 816: 813: 812: 805:Low-importance 801: 795: 794: 792: 754: 742: 741: 739:Low‑importance 733: 721: 720: 717: 716: 709:Low-importance 705: 699: 698: 696: 679:the discussion 666: 665: 649: 637: 636: 634:Low‑importance 628: 616: 615: 612: 611: 604:Low-importance 600: 594: 593: 591: 574:the discussion 560: 548: 547: 545:Low‑importance 539: 527: 526: 523: 522: 519: 518: 513: 503: 502: 497: 487: 486: 484: 482: 476: 475: 467: 466: 463: 462: 460: 458: 457: 456: 445: 434: 423: 412: 398: 397: 395: 382: 372: 371: 369: 338: 326: 325: 310: 298: 297: 294: 293: 290:Low-importance 280: 270: 269: 262:Low-importance 258: 252: 251: 249: 232:the discussion 222: 210: 209: 207:Low‑importance 195: 183: 182: 179: 178: 171:Low-importance 167: 161: 160: 158: 124: 123: 107: 95: 94: 92:Low‑importance 86: 74: 73: 67: 56: 42: 41: 30:poorly sourced 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2634: 2623: 2620: 2618: 2615: 2613: 2610: 2608: 2605: 2603: 2600: 2598: 2595: 2593: 2590: 2588: 2585: 2583: 2580: 2578: 2575: 2573: 2570: 2568: 2565: 2563: 2560: 2558: 2555: 2553: 2550: 2548: 2545: 2543: 2540: 2538: 2535: 2533: 2530: 2528: 2525: 2523: 2520: 2518: 2515: 2513: 2510: 2509: 2507: 2494: 2489: 2486: 2482: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2459: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2432: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2400: 2397: 2396: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2305: 2304: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2270: 2269: 2267: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2244: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2227: 2225: 2223: 2221: 2219: 2217: 2215: 2213: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2149: 2148: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2078: 2076: 2074: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2010: 2009: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1989: 1987: 1981: 1977: 1975: 1972: 1971:for Pakistan 1970: 1967: 1964: 1961: 1960: 1956: 1950: 1940: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1911: 1905: 1904: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1864: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1826: 1820: 1819: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1709: 1707: 1702: 1697: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1672: 1664: 1659: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1620: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1574: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1516: 1515: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1498: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1488: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1346: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1313: 1309: 1304: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1126: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1104: 1103: 1101: 1093: 1085: 1084: 1082: 1074: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1055: 1054: 1052: 1045: 1041: 1032: 1024: 1019: 1016: 1012: 1006: 1002: 998: 994: 990: 986: 982: 978: 974: 973: 972: 968: 964: 960: 956: 952: 948: 944: 943: 942: 941: 940: 939: 935: 931: 921: 916: 908: 905: 901: 898: 895: 891: 887: 883: 879: 875: 872: 868: 865: 861: 858: 855: 851: 846: 843: 837:</ref: --> 828: 826: 810: 806: 800: 797: 796: 793: 776: 772: 768: 764: 763: 758: 755: 752: 748: 747: 743: 737: 734: 731: 727: 714: 710: 704: 701: 700: 697: 680: 676: 672: 671: 663: 652: 650: 647: 643: 642: 638: 632: 629: 626: 622: 609: 605: 599: 596: 595: 592: 579:Organizations 575: 571: 570:Organizations 567: 566: 561: 558: 554: 553: 549: 543: 542:Organizations 540: 537: 533: 517: 509: 505: 504: 501: 493: 489: 488: 485: 483: 478: 477: 472: 468: 461: 459: 454:criterion met 446: 443:criterion met 435: 432:criterion met 424: 421:criterion met 413: 402: 401: 400: 399: 396: 393: 392: 386: 383: 378: 374: 373: 370: 353: 349: 345: 344: 339: 336: 332: 331: 327: 323: 319: 314: 311: 308: 304: 291: 288:(assessed as 287: 286: 276: 272: 271: 267: 263: 257: 254: 253: 250: 233: 229: 228: 223: 220: 216: 215: 211: 204: 199: 196: 193: 189: 176: 172: 166: 163: 162: 159: 142: 138: 134: 130: 129: 121: 110: 108: 105: 101: 100: 96: 90: 87: 84: 80: 75: 71: 65: 57: 53: 48: 47: 39: 35: 31: 26: 25: 20: 18: 17: 2488: 2480: 2273: 2237: 2211: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2037:— Preceding 1990: 1982: 1978: 1973: 1965: 1962: 1944: 1899: 1838: 1834: 1814: 1765: 1705: 1700: 1695: 1676: 1658: 1650: 1626:— Preceding 1622: 1617: 1519: 1494: 1493: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1474: 1473: 1344: 1250: 1237: 1218: 1201: 1152: 1123:Apparently, 1107: 1099: 1097: 1080: 1078: 1050: 1048: 1033:POV dispute? 1018: 1010: 917: 913: 832: 824: 804: 771:project page 760: 756: 708: 668: 603: 563: 389: 341: 283: 261: 225: 170: 137:project page 126: 70:WikiProjects 33: 22: 2461:Wikiemirati 2408:Wikiemirati 2372:Wikiemirati 2309:Wikiemirati 2278:Wikiemirati 2248:Wikiemirati 2153:Wikiemirati 2095:Wikiemirati 2043:Mountain157 2014:Wikiemirati 1994:Wikiemirati 1949:Mountain157 1477:independent 1211:Mullah Omar 1165:Durand Line 918:...but the 907:NATO – ISAF 880:Operational 867:Afghanistan 759:is part of 430:Structure: 146:Afghanistan 133:Afghanistan 89:Afghanistan 2506:Categories 2481:References 1980:research. 1651:References 1613:hedge bets 1578:Jorge Koli 1522:Jorge Koli 1497:Waziristan 1445:Jorge Koli 1358:Mujahideen 1267:Jorge Koli 1246:Mujahideen 1202:originated 1188:Jorge Koli 1174:Jorge Koli 1149:Mujahideen 1100:Pakistanis 1011:References 963:Meatsgains 775:discussion 322:South Asia 141:discussion 21:While the 2458:WP:HA#NOT 2087:CONFIRMED 1573:this here 1426:Islamabad 1424:based in 1051:Pakistani 903:Opponents 2051:contribs 2039:unsigned 1976:for UAE 1868:RDavi404 1784:RDavi404 1738:RDavi404 1640:contribs 1632:Multan47 1628:unsigned 1599:RDavi404 1542:WP:CIVIL 1110:RDavi404 1044:ABC News 997:RDavi404 981:RDavi404 930:RDavi404 920:template 871:Pakistan 684:Pakistan 675:Pakistan 631:Pakistan 391:criteria 2238:alleged 1959:WP:NPOV 1312:WP:NPOV 1303:Pashtun 897:Taliban 807:on the 780:Pashtun 767:Pashtun 736:Pashtun 711:on the 606:on the 264:on the 173:on the 60:C-class 2091:ALLIED 1945:Hello 1734:burden 1550:WP:POV 1538:WP:AGF 893:Allies 888:15,000 877:Status 853:Leader 66:scale. 1902:Mar4d 1817:Mar4d 1768:p105 1595:WP:OR 1559:Mar4d 1554:WP:RS 1430:Mar4d 1376:Mar4d 1350:WP:RS 1224:Mar4d 1215:WP:RS 1130:Mar4d 1095:PAN: 1076:PAN: 947:Mar4d 318:Asian 2465:talk 2412:talk 2376:talk 2313:talk 2282:talk 2252:talk 2157:talk 2099:talk 2047:talk 2018:talk 1998:talk 1968:and 1957:and 1909:talk 1887:talk 1872:talk 1848:talk 1824:talk 1802:talk 1788:talk 1774:talk 1756:talk 1742:talk 1722:talk 1683:talk 1636:talk 1603:talk 1582:talk 1563:talk 1540:and 1526:talk 1449:talk 1434:talk 1380:talk 1345:does 1271:talk 1255:PDPA 1228:talk 1192:talk 1178:talk 1134:talk 1114:talk 1001:talk 985:talk 967:talk 951:talk 934:talk 885:Size 2274:YOU 1988:. 1597:.-- 1365:as 1356:or 1261:or 1244:or 1155:by 1061:PAN 799:Low 703:Low 598:Low 256:Low 165:Low 2508:: 2467:) 2414:) 2378:) 2315:) 2284:) 2254:) 2159:) 2101:) 2053:) 2049:• 2020:) 2000:) 1912:) 1889:) 1874:) 1850:) 1827:) 1804:) 1790:) 1776:) 1758:) 1744:) 1724:) 1685:) 1642:) 1638:• 1605:) 1584:) 1565:) 1528:) 1451:) 1436:) 1420:/ 1382:) 1314::) 1273:) 1230:) 1194:) 1180:) 1136:) 1116:) 1063:: 1003:) 987:) 979:-- 969:) 953:) 936:) 480:/ 320:/ 316:: 292:). 201:: 2463:( 2410:( 2374:( 2311:( 2280:( 2250:( 2155:( 2097:( 2045:( 2016:( 1996:( 1951:: 1947:@ 1906:( 1885:( 1870:( 1846:( 1821:( 1800:( 1786:( 1772:( 1754:( 1740:( 1720:( 1706:S 1701:M 1696:S 1681:( 1634:( 1601:( 1580:( 1561:( 1524:( 1447:( 1432:( 1378:( 1269:( 1226:( 1190:( 1176:( 1132:( 1112:( 1102:. 1083:, 999:( 983:( 965:( 949:( 932:( 869:- 811:. 777:. 715:. 610:. 354:. 268:. 177:. 143:. 72:: 40:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index