273:, I have removed a lot of images of marginal relevance from this article. It is essential that we have a *small* number of Hasse diagrams as examples to show what they are, but, as IMAGE RELEVANCE says, "You should always be watchful not to overwhelm an article with images by adding more just because you can." Additionally, beyond there being simply too many images, many of them were packed with extraneous graphical information that may be relevant to the partial orders from which they were derived but that did not help illustrate the topic of Hasse diagrams in general. Feel free to discuss here. —
95:
85:
64:
31:
186:
second has a row of six beige nodes diagonally down the middle of the drawing, together with two more beige nodes at the top left and the bottom right. Therefore, it looks like the row of six is supposed to correspond with the row of six and that the two isoltaed nodes are supposed to correspond with the two isolated nodes. But that doesn't work: it would cause some of the edges in the second drawing to go downwards instead of upwards.
22:
328:
There isn't an applications section, but was wondering if there is any point in mentioning or explaining the great importance of Hasse diagrams in comparative research design in many fields? R. A. Bailey has some outstanding examples, and other texts compare Hasse to recent Latin Square approaches to
185:
introduces a redrawing of the three alternative Hasse diagrams of a powerset (or hypercube), that is, I think, a little prettier than the earlier version of the same set of figures. The first has a row of six beige nodes in the middle, together with two more beige nodes at the top and the bottom. The
308:
Maybe there were formerly too many images, but now careless removal of images from the article has broken it. Under 'A "good" Hasse diagram' there are now only two diagrams, but four descriptions of diagrams. It isn't even immediately clear which descriptions are associated with diagrams, and which
173:
This is not a topic for discussion, it is rather a question. The problem is with problems concerning
Permutations and Combinations. Whenever a question is put up, i don't know which of them is to be used. Is there any way where i can figure out which application to use for a certain problem? Please
189:
There is a correspondence of beige nodes to beige nodes that does work, and leaves all edges upwards, but it's not the obvious one. For this reason, I find the new drawing confusing. But perhaps not confusing enough to just keep reverting, so I have undone my second reversion and left this comment
292:
to the three that have always been there, because I wanted to avoid the impression that Hasse diagrams always represent lattices. However, a good solution cold be an article with few images and a gallery on
Commons linked from here.
151:
372:
190:
instead. I hope it can be possible to find a drawing that has not just the aesthetic appeal of this new version, but also avoids the confusion of the sort I fell into here. —
377:
362:
230:
The first paragraph describes the diagram in terms of the less-than operator, but later in the article, it seems to use less-than-or-equal. Is this significant? —
35:
367:
387:
141:
382:
357:
117:
352:
211:
108:
69:
44:
266:
314:
278:
21:
215:
334:
235:
50:
250:
94:
310:
270:
207:
274:
191:
246:
116:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
100:
84:
63:
298:
330:
231:
346:
329:
design. Didn't want to write a section if there is no need. Great article in general.
294:
113:
90:
245:
I think it is. So I have just changed the definition in the first paragraph.
338:
318:
302:
282:
254:
239:
219:
194:
309:
descriptions are now orphaned and not associated with any diagram.
15:
204:
This article looks much better than average maths article
289:
182:
324:
112:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
373:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Mathematics
8:
19:
58:
378:Start-Class vital articles in Mathematics
363:Knowledge vital articles in Mathematics
60:
7:
106:This article is within the scope of
49:It is of interest to the following
368:Start-Class level-5 vital articles
14:
388:Low-priority mathematics articles
126:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
383:Start-Class mathematics articles
358:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
129:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
93:
83:
62:
29:
20:
169:Permutations or Combinations...
146:This article has been rated as
1:
319:10:55, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
255:10:20, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
220:12:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
195:03:50, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
120:and see a list of open tasks.
339:22:17, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
404:
353:Start-Class vital articles
303:22:43, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
283:22:23, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
240:17:14, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
145:
78:
57:
152:project's priority scale
109:WikiProject Mathematics
226:Question: < vs. ≤ ?
290:added another example
178:New diagrams of cubes
36:level-5 vital article
132:mathematics articles
267:WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE
101:Mathematics portal
45:content assessment
222:
210:comment added by
166:
165:
162:
161:
158:
157:
395:
205:
134:
133:
130:
127:
124:
103:
98:
97:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
16:
403:
402:
398:
397:
396:
394:
393:
392:
343:
342:
326:
311:Martin Gradwell
263:
261:Too many images
228:
202:
180:
171:
131:
128:
125:
122:
121:
99:
92:
72:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
30:
12:
11:
5:
401:
399:
391:
390:
385:
380:
375:
370:
365:
360:
355:
345:
344:
325:
322:
306:
305:
275:David Eppstein
262:
259:
258:
257:
227:
224:
201:
198:
192:David Eppstein
179:
176:
170:
167:
164:
163:
160:
159:
156:
155:
144:
138:
137:
135:
118:the discussion
105:
104:
88:
76:
75:
67:
55:
54:
48:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
400:
389:
386:
384:
381:
379:
376:
374:
371:
369:
366:
364:
361:
359:
356:
354:
351:
350:
348:
341:
340:
336:
332:
323:
321:
320:
316:
312:
304:
300:
296:
291:
287:
286:
285:
284:
280:
276:
272:
271:WP:NOTGALLERY
268:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
243:
242:
241:
237:
233:
225:
223:
221:
217:
213:
212:81.110.32.149
209:
199:
197:
196:
193:
187:
184:
177:
175:
168:
153:
149:
143:
140:
139:
136:
119:
115:
111:
110:
102:
96:
91:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
37:
27:
23:
18:
17:
327:
307:
264:
229:
203:
200:Nice article
188:
181:
172:
148:Low-priority
147:
107:
73:Low‑priority
51:WikiProjects
34:
331:Pdecalculus
232:Burt Harris
206:—Preceding
123:Mathematics
114:mathematics
70:Mathematics
41:Start-class
347:Categories
183:This diff
174:suggest.
39:is rated
208:unsigned
295:Lipedia
288:I have
247:Forejtv
150:on the
47:scale.
28:This
335:talk
315:talk
299:talk
279:talk
269:and
265:Per
251:talk
236:talk
216:talk
142:Low
349::
337:)
317:)
301:)
281:)
253:)
238:)
218:)
333:(
313:(
297:(
277:(
249:(
234:(
214:(
154:.
53::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
