Talk:Heian Palace - Knowledge

2025:

appropriate name used was Jūnidō-in (十二堂院). I will add a clarifying comment and cite Van Goethem for this (I see you have already added Hasshō-in as an alternative name). That reference should also cover the added cn tag. As for the diagram, I had not noticed before but my original was edited late last year, introducing Hasshō-in as the only name for the compound. In addition, Daijōkan had been changed into Dajōkan, which may seem like more common pronunciation of the first kanji (太), but all sources (including dictionaries of both contemporary and classical Japanese) confirm that Daijōkan is correct. I have now reverted the picture in Wikimedia Commons.

1178:) but is unsupported by references to any source. This information can not be found in the standard sources used for the article. Further, the name of the supposed typhoon ("grazana") does not appear to conform to Japanese phonology, making the addition somewhat suspicious. I would ask the anonymous contributor to provide sources for the added information (in addition to fixing the broken language). Otherwise I'm inclined to remove the addition to maintain the article at FA standards. 241: 214: 317: 370: 21: 349: 183: 515: 54: 251: 2496:, where accusations and counteraccusations of arson were used to exclude competing factions (in this particular case: to cement the power of the Fujiwara against rivals). But I am not sure we should start to add too many such events here; rather have them have their own pages linking to the palace. The history section is already quite long relative to the whole article. 380: 1430:, and thanks for your great work on this article. I'm optimistic about a Keep at FAR, and I hope I can be helpful. As I noted at FAR, I'm woefully under-informed on this topic, which can be a barrier to copyediting. Would you prefer I act on the bolder side, with you keeping an eye on the changes, or that I bring more concerns/questions here for you to fix? 1217:大内裏, which translates as "Great Palace" or "Greater Palace", which is the whole compound. This is also the article name in the Japanese Wiki. In Japanese it is not called "Heian Palace" or "Heian Dairi" (although the name "Heian Shrine" from "Heian Jingu" is the correct translation). Are there any suggestions or comments? 1673:

as it is really part of the name of these avenues; for example Nijō ōji (二条大路) is the avenue acting as the northern limit of the second "sector" Nijō (二条) of the city. In particular, Nijō alone has wrong referent. In my mind this is not unlike Avenue Georges V in Paris - we would not lightly drop the

1619:

I now reread the relevant sections of the book, and I still think there is not much strictly new material information on the Heian Palace (some interesting details, yes). On the other hand, it is an excellent source on a very closely-related topic and should be useful for deeper background, so adding

1588:

by Ellen Van Goethem. The book is focused on Nagaoka, but has info on Heian-kyo starting in Chapter 10. For example, p. 214 has info on purchasing the land for the palace from peasants and Kanmu ordering the various provinces to be responsible for building the palace gates (with a foonoted caveat). I

1346:

The caption on the image showing the map of Heian with the old palace in it says that the location of the "Tsuchimikado temporary palace that developed into the current Kyoto Imperial Palace" is also included in the map. This is not true any more, since the map's image was updated in 2019 to "correct

773:

I have failed this article based on the GA criteria, which almost seems a shame because bsaed purely on quality of writing and effort expended etc the article is in very good shape, it simply fails to meet a few of the criteria formally demanded of a good article. Some of these are trivial to address

1563:

I checked the text for italicisation, and found just a few Japanese terms to fix (jingi-kan and kami). The current system has the Japanese names of major parts of the palace italicised when introduced (or reintroduced) but not on subsequent occurrences. I trust that after your careful review this is

1124:

If they are, in fact, deemed to be superfluous, then I've misunderstood the flexible criteria for deciding what to keep and what to exclude from a list of internal and external links. I will need to re-visit a number of articles where my decision-making about links has been flawed; and I'll need to

975:

according to which (i) a section for listing references separately from notes is optional and (ii) if there is a separate bibliography section, it is usually not meant to repeat the items in the Notes/References section. And in any case, the References section indeed contains all the sources I would

2510:

I do think the incidents that "had specifically to do with the palace itself" should get at least a short mention, with a link to a longer treatment elsewhere. I get what you're saying about the History section being long, but we could break it up into different sections. I made an attempt at this.

713:

Work on this court bureaucracy article was only completed this month; and in the normal course of events, there would have been no cause for delay. Perhaps the "Featured Article" status creates special conditions with which I'm as yet unfamiliar? The tag at the top of this page does encourage me to

1128:

The links were part of this article in December 2007 when it was determined to be a "Featured Article"; ergo, these specific links in this particular article has received the imprimatur of whatever broad Wiki-consensus preceded that FA designation. In my view, this means that the removal of links

1025:

First, and most importantly, the GA review has not closed. It has exactly one recommendation. Although that recommendation is in your favor, that is not necessarily indicative of what the final outcome will be. Promoting your own article to GA prior to consensus being reached at GA/R is completely

990:

As the references in the article do not fall under the first set of items, page numbers are not required by the GA criteria. In fact, as there are several notes to a reasonably small number of sources, providing the page numbers for each note would require an individual item for each note, with 13

2573:

The revised text is good. The year 1227 is neither and was apparently introduced by an anonymous edit in December 2007 (an edit I never noticed having taken place - too easy to be blind...). 1227 is the year that the palace largely burned down as stated later on the page, which is where the anon

742:

appropriate. However, the location of the main gate (together with the schematic map of Heian-kyō) provides a convenient way of giving the location of the old palace in the main article and finding it on online maps. Alternatives would be to give the centre point (which would be less useful for

1037:

Past that, there is a template one can use to cite the same reference but with different page numbers on one line. Rather than simply having the alphabet appear beside the reference number, there will be the alphabet with page numbers in parenthesis beside each letter. I'll have to do a little

2024:

Yes, that was indeed an alternative name used for the compound. It apparently dates from the older Naniwa-kyō and Nagaoka-kyō palaces, where the corresponding courtyard indeed contained 8 halls. However, the Heian Palace compound had 12 halls in this courtyard, and correspondingly the more

2511:

In my view, the article is imbalanced toward physical description of the palace and more description of its history would help. Since the article is not too large overall, there's room to address the imbalance with content addition, and no need to trim the quality architectural content.

1935:

It's not clear why the reader needs to know about the location of Kyoto Imperial Palace. Giving directions relative to the otherwise unmentioned Tsuchimikado Mansion comes off as trivial. McCullough also mentions the location this way, but does not name the mansion as Tsuchimikado.

1620:

it as a reference makes sense. I think the information about the politics of the palace location might be more relevant/interesting fact, and I have added that to the article with reference to Van Goethem (in addition to McCullough 1999 where it is also covered...).

1077:

after unanimous consensus. The archived discussion can be found . Good work. In improving this article to meet the standards of GA, you have improved Knowledge. Also notice in the discussion that one editor, who frequent reviews articles nominated for

961:: matter of taste. I did not find any guidelines either, but decided to cut most of the bold-faced letters, leaving only the names of the three main compounds within the palace. Don't know if this improves readability or not, but I don't object either. 2491:

I think this is essentially a question of where to set the cut-off point - the palace necessarily was the stage of much that was politically important during the Heian period. Some incidents had specifically to do with the palace itself, such as the

1496:

Hog Farm brought this up earlier, but there's still an issue with jargon brought up without explanation. I'll fix these as I'm able, but one or both of us should probably do a full review to make sure all Japanese terms are explained on first use.

1350:

So either the caption should be updated not to mention the Tsuchimikado palace, or the image itself should be updated to include it again. Probably the second option is preferable, since more relevant information will be available that way.

1607:

I read Van Goethem's excellent book a long while back, and did not think it contained essential information specifically about the later Heian Palace (while it has more relevant information that could be useful to improve

2640:

As for additional pictures: I have not been able to find online another picture from the contemporaneous Genji Monogatari Emaki that depicts a scene at the actual palace (and not just similar architectural settings).

1354:(I don't do the edition myself because I have no experience in Knowledge edition nor an account which would allow me to modify the image. Thank you for the work on the article! I learned interesting things from it. 991:

lines for the first article referenced, completely cluttering the article. The articles referenced are also relatively short, and thus finding the corresponding pages for verification purposes is straightforward.

2778: 1008:

among Japan-related articles), where the same approach to references and footnotes can be seen. Thus, in order to see if my interpretation of the citation guidelines find support, I'm putting this article up to

1137:

removed these links is not merely rhetorical. I'm interested in the reasoning and evaluation process so that my own decision-making can be better informed when I confront similar situations in future.

2773: 1030:, several editors will review the article and make recommendations. An archivist will read all of the discussion, weigh the arguments, and determine consensus. Once that determination has been made 326: 224: 2574:

probably picked it up. The correct version stated that Kyoto was the capital 794-1868; it could be useful to retain that piece of information if you see how it could fit with the revised wording.

708:

and its subsidiary Eight Ministries. The palace was designed to provide an appropriate setting for the emperor's residence, the conduct of great affairs of state, and the accompanying ceremonies.

1840:

The beginning of this section could do more to summarize the history leading into the construction of Heian and choice of the city as the capital. Not at length, but more. Hall has some on this.

1133:

I'm confident that the third of these arguments has merit, but the more ideosyncratic nature of my initial arguments leaves them always open to question. For that reason, my interest in why

153: 60: 2533:

The dates in the first couple sentences could use some clarification. Is 1227 the end of the palace's use as the official palace or the end of Heian-kyo as the capital or both?

1026:

unacceptable. I'm assuming you didn't understand the process and promoted it in good faith, however, you are now aware that things don't work that way. As noted at the top of

1814:

Absolutely, sounds very good! I was not aware of this template when adding the new inline refs in the past few months - apparently something to look into for future edits!

1589:

know over-reliance on the McCulloughs was one reason we discounted other sources (why not just cite a McCullough?), but at a glance Goethem appears to cite them sparingly.

1063:

was nit aware of the GA/R procedures at the time, and it seemed to me that it was actually passing. This is why I jumped to promotions. Thanks for the GA/R crash course. --

692:

I don't understand what you mean by "link freeze," but I can guess. In that spirit, I wonder when would be a good time to edit the third paragraph to insert a new link to

134: 35: 2803: 602: 331: 1777:. It would mean that the citations link right to the cited sources in the Reference section, an the template automatically combines re-used source/page number combos. 1082:, feels that the only thing standing between this article and FA is page numbers. Hopefully those can be obtained. Good luck with the possible future FA nomination. 2818: 462: 2793: 2341:

It seems that you had deleted the citations? I had apparently forgotten to add the reference in late October, but now both ref and inline citations are in place.

1288: 1284: 1270: 801:

cannot find MOS page referencing it but the constant use of bold text is unnecessary and distracting and I'm sure it doesn't adhere to MOS - fail on this criteria

297: 988:

Page numbers must be included in a citation that accompanies a specific quotation from, or a paraphrase or reference to, a specific passage of a book or article.

307: 1129:

which are effectively "certified" (in a manner of speaking) requires a more expanded explanation than will fit within the limited confineds of an edit summary.

1773:

some citations are duplicated and should be combined. I started to create ref names, and then figured I'd ask first if you would be ok with a switch to using

610: 971:

the bibliography of the article. In addition to it, further web site bibliography is provided in External links. I checked the GA criteria and the links to

96: 2798: 648: 531: 714:

act now ...? In any case, edits can be easily reverted. I would hope this note shows that I gave your proposed caveat the consideration it deserved. --

2284:

I see no sandwiches! I won't be able to catch up here this week, as my son is coming to visit ... hopefully I'll get caught up at FAR the week after.

1736:" from the Location section. To me the relevant text in the Greater Palace section looks right as is, without burdening the text with translation of " 1117:

I have restored them temporarily in order to provide an opportunity for further discussion. My arguments for maintaining these links are three-fold:

2745: 2700: 2666: 2625: 2597: 2564: 2542: 2520: 2482: 2460: 2428: 2390: 2364: 2332: 2314: 2305:

I think I'm done with copyedits, though I'd like to do another pass through. I would appreciate a second look to make sure I didn't mess anything up.

2271: 2223: 2160: 2111: 2075: 2057: 2011: 1963: 1945: 1910: 1886: 1849: 1786: 1723: 1705: 1656: 1598: 1550: 1506: 1478: 1442: 2612:

I added an image (diff) and I wonder (a) if there's any issue with my caption or the image's relevance here and (b) are there any other parts of the

2813: 2788: 523: 273: 2718:

But in any case it is probably better to delete that claim since there are again new occasional (and interesting!) excavations going on, such as

1519:

I have now combed the text for these, and found only one left after your careful work: the great council of state is now exaplained in the lede.

1452:

First: big thank for volunteering to help! I notice you've got started already, and I'll try to respond to your questions below as soon as I can.

472: 2783: 1213:

This is a great article, thank you to all the contributors. The name of the article is however rather misleading. It talks about the general

561: 554: 2768: 1979:

Added both short explanation of jingi-kan and pointed out its relevance as the last (known) structure of the palace to remain in some use.

1406:

I agree with you about the citation concerns, and low number of sources cited in the article. Are you interested in bringing this to FAR?

955:

Thanks for the essentially positive GA review above. I have addressed some of the criteria while leaving some untouched. In more detail:

2823: 1365: 2120:

No objection. It would be better if we had an article on Heian-period precedence structure, but the generic article should do for now.

702:

The original role of the palace was to manifest the centralised government model adopted by Japan from China in the 7th century -- the

1153:

The places are already included in the template at the very bottom, therefore it is not necessary to double-link them in one article.

627: 581: 568: 264: 219: 2808: 1740:": Ōmiya ōji is a proper name of an avenue, unitalicised as per the policy and comparable to how, e.g., Friedrichstrasse is used in 1266:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

1714:

In the body text, can we move the first mention of (and translation for) the term to the beginning of §Greater Palace (Daidairi)?

1433:

As I go, I'll place things I can't fix myself (or don't have the time for) below. Feel free to strike them as they are resolved.

413: 405: 1256: 636: 2197: 1455:

As for style of edits, I think what you've done in terms of editing straight away vs. posting questions below works well.

813:

fail on this criteria, use of ISBN numbers in cites is welcome and good to see but there is no bibliography provided at all

2741: 2696: 2662: 2621: 2593: 2560: 2538: 2516: 2478: 2456: 2424: 2386: 2360: 2328: 2310: 2267: 2219: 2156: 2107: 2071: 2053: 2007: 1959: 1941: 1906: 1882: 1845: 1782: 1719: 1701: 1652: 1594: 1546: 1502: 1474: 1438: 2048:"the Twelve Halls, where the bureaucracy was seated for ceremonies according to strict order of precedence" is unclear. 1331: 194: 2588:

I added a bit on the city being the capital until 1868 in the body. Do you think it needs to be mentioned in the lead?

1537:

While the above is handled, I've spotted at least a couple un-italicized Japanese terms that should be italicized per

417: 409: 393: 354: 30: 734:

I added back the removed geographical coordinates of Suzakumon. They were moved from this article to the article on

2173:

Sure, that translation seems to be used by later English sources as well. I see you've already added that, thanks!

923:

articles seem to be appropriately licences and are relevant to the article. Schematic plans are an unexpected bonus

1900:

In what sense was the reconstruction of the Dairi done "systematically". Could we just say "always"? "faithfully"?

1175: 1287:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2737: 2692: 2658: 2617: 2589: 2556: 2534: 2512: 2474: 2452: 2420: 2382: 2356: 2324: 2306: 2281: 2263: 2215: 2152: 2103: 2067: 2049: 2003: 1955: 1937: 1902: 1878: 1841: 1778: 1715: 1697: 1648: 1590: 1542: 1498: 1470: 1434: 934: 586: 182: 20: 1347:

a typo and refine the typography", but the rectangle indicating the Tsuchimikado palace was removed as well.

1696:

is not part of any name. I'd suggest moving the explanation of the term into the schematic, or its caption.

1389: 1369: 1322: 1248: 2613: 2451:

That is such a classic FFF mistake to make. So focused on the year and decade that I slip on the century.

2294: 1805: 1647:? I'd like to keep our use of Japanese terms to the ones most critical to an understanding of the palace. 1171: 787:

A few spelling errors such as "adopted by Japan from Chine". Generally fine though, pass on this criterion

1004:. This is further supported by a quick review of recently passed GA articles and also FA articles (e.g., 53: 1306:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1294: 200: 40: 2473:

Are there any other major historical moments that are related to the palace that need to be mentioned?

1373: 1247:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1361: 1222: 719: 618: 2493: 2099: 930: 421: 256: 2002:

Is the Chōdō-in also called Hasshō-in? There seems to be a mismatch between the text and diagram.

272:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2084:

Reorganised and added clarifying wording (both for the Twelve Halls and the Accession Audience).

1401: 1385: 1088: 1044: 594: 2234:

Added back the comment about excavations of the Buraku-in, paraphrased to avoid copyvio issues.

1291:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2378: 1307: 240: 213: 2634:

I suppose this repeats the question "Can we incorporate ] into the section on the Seiryoden?"?

2285: 2259: 1796: 1538: 967:: Here I do not understand the comment. The References section (to which the footnotes point) 44: 2262:

just to keep you in the loop, and to ask if you wouldn't mind reviewing for SANDWICH issues.

1257:

https://web.archive.org/web/20070313011022/http://tukineko.pekori.jp/heian/daidai/daidai.html

2727: 2680: 2646: 2579: 2501: 2442: 2404: 2346: 2239: 2205: 2178: 2125: 2089: 2030: 1984: 1924: 1868: 1819: 1749: 1679: 1625: 1569: 1524: 1460: 1198: 1183: 1143: 682: 316: 1314: 1038:

searching to find it, but it shouldn't take long. I just found it a couple days or so ago.

1411: 1218: 1154: 1134: 715: 2691:"since the late 1970s" is mentioned in the lead but not repeated or sourced in the body. 369: 348: 1613: 1273:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1027: 1010: 983: 972: 945: 514: 1313:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2762: 2437:

Good additions, thanks! I corrected the year of the Hogen rebellion (1156 not 1556).

1795:

Stca74, this would be a good thing :) I resisted sfns for years, but now I'm a fan.

1384:

This article does not meet current FA standards because it is uncited in many places

1260: 1083: 1039: 2399:

Yes, we should definitely use the image. Great that it could be found on wikimedia!

1583: 2196:

I found a more appropriate replacement for the removed link "Chinese" in the lead (

1774: 1240: 1079: 1074: 425: 385: 269: 1609: 704: 693: 2723: 2676: 2642: 2575: 2497: 2438: 2400: 2342: 2255: 2235: 2201: 2174: 2121: 2085: 2026: 1980: 1920: 1864: 1815: 1768: 1745: 1675: 1621: 1565: 1520: 1456: 1427: 1280: 1194: 1179: 1139: 1014: 744: 678: 2719: 1407: 1279:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 375: 246: 1103:]'s edit removed the following links, identifying them as "superfluous" ...: 1064: 2657:

Can we cut mention of the Shōkyōden or elaborate on its purpose/importance?

1860: 743:

locating on maps) or all four corners of the palace (too many coordinates).

735: 827:

fails on this criteria due to failure to provide page numbers for the cites

2415:

I added some content in the history section and would appreciate review.

754: 2709:

That was originally in the Primary Sources section, but removed in your

948:

to get clarity on guidelines for citing sources and providing references

250: 996:

My understanding of the GA criteria is that the article indeed passes

2377:

Can we incorporate ] into the section on the Seiryoden? According to

1741: 1692:

from the schematic at the top, but from the section "Location". Here

1005: 2749: 2731: 2704: 2684: 2670: 2650: 2629: 2601: 2583: 2568: 2546: 2524: 2505: 2486: 2464: 2446: 2432: 2408: 2394: 2368: 2350: 2336: 2318: 2298: 2275: 2243: 2227: 2209: 2182: 2164: 2129: 2115: 2093: 2079: 2061: 2034: 2015: 1988: 1967: 1949: 1928: 1914: 1890: 1872: 1853: 1823: 1809: 1790: 1753: 1727: 1709: 1683: 1660: 1629: 1602: 1573: 1554: 1528: 1510: 1482: 1464: 1446: 1415: 1393: 1336: 1226: 1202: 1187: 1159: 1147: 1093: 1067: 1049: 1017: 938: 757: 747: 723: 686: 1170:

New content on typhoon destruction to the palace has been added by

2323:

The Kawamoto 2016 citations don't have a corresponding reference.

399: 1954:

Jingi-kan is not explained at all, and the relevance is unclear.

1121:

I think they should stay because I personally found them helpful.

1972:

Added text to explain that Tsuchimikado eventually grew from a

843:

passes on this criteria, no evidence of original research at all

2355:

A different editor did, actually. Thanks for adding them back!

1976:

into the new permanent palace location (on much smaller scale).

2715:. I cannot find my old reference for the excavations in 1970s. 176: 1582:

Stca74, what are your thoughts on including information from

513: 315: 2151:? McCullough gives "Hall of Abundant Pleasures" on p. 111. 1863:

has more detail and the article is already linked earlier.

1193:

With no sources forthcoming, I've reverted the added text.

2779:

Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once

1251:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

907:

pass on this crtieria, no sign of any ongoing edit war etc

2675:

Added some information from McCullough & McCullough.

2555:

of the early lead, which I'd also like your thoughts on.

641: 2711: 2552: 2416: 1244: 1034:

will go through the steps to list the article or not.

507: 502: 497: 492: 433: 146: 127: 108: 89: 1125:

re-think how I view this aspect of editing in future.

2774:

Featured articles that have appeared on the main page

1859:

Added a very short contextualising summary. Happily

614:: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. 420:. Current time in Japan: 09:51, September 29, 2024 ( 397:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 268:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1612:not to mention the sadly underdeveloped article on 1283:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 859:

passes on this criteria, covers all expected topics

1261:http://tukineko.pekori.jp/heian/daidai/daidai.html 59:This article appeared on Knowledge's Main Page as 774:but some might take some time to fix. In detail: 412:, where you can join the project, participate in 1341: 976:incoprprate in a separate Bibliography section. 2258:. I have a few more items for review. Pinging 1269:This message was posted before February 2018. 2722:. I'll delete the 1970s point from the lead. 2066:"Accession Audiences" need some explanation. 8: 2637:The picture and caption both work perfectly. 1919:Yes, could replace with "always". Did that. 891:pass on this criteria, article seems neutral 43:. Even so, if you can update or improve it, 39:as one of the best articles produced by the 33:; it (or a previous version of it) has been 2616:that we can use to illustrate the article? 1059:promote his own article in any way. I did. 1359: 1239:I have just modified one external link on 480: 343: 208: 68: 15: 1732:I think that makes sense, and I removed " 2804:High-importance Historic houses articles 180: 1166:Unsourced information on typhoon damage 434: 345: 210: 2819:High-importance Japan-related articles 1342:Map's caption is not accurate any more 677:i propose a link freeze while its a fa 2794:High-importance Architecture articles 7: 1744:, with no translation of "strasse". 391:This article is within the scope of 262:This article is within the scope of 404:on Knowledge. If you would like to 199:It is of interest to the following 1585:Nagaoka: Japan's Forgotten Capital 1055:I'd like to point that Stca74 did 915:6 images appropriate and licensed: 282:Knowledge:WikiProject Architecture 14: 2799:FA-Class Historic houses articles 2098:Better! Any objection to linking 1243:. Please take a moment to review 285:Template:WikiProject Architecture 1073:This article has been listed at 779:1a clear prose and good grammar: 378: 368: 347: 249: 239: 212: 181: 52: 19: 2814:FA-Class Japan-related articles 1564:in accordance with the policy. 467:This article has been rated as 302:This article has been rated as 2789:FA-Class Architecture articles 2381:, it's a fictional depiction. 2198:Ancient Chinese urban planning 1337:15:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC) 327:the Historic houses task force 1: 2750:04:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC) 2732:11:41, 13 February 2023 (UTC) 2705:06:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC) 2685:11:10, 13 February 2023 (UTC) 2671:06:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC) 2651:10:55, 13 February 2023 (UTC) 2630:06:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC) 2602:04:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC) 2584:10:26, 13 February 2023 (UTC) 2569:06:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC) 2547:06:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC) 2525:04:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC) 2506:10:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC) 2487:06:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC) 2465:04:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC) 2447:09:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC) 2433:06:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC) 2409:09:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC) 2395:06:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC) 2369:04:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC) 2351:12:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC) 2337:06:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC) 2319:06:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC) 2299:12:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC) 2276:06:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC) 2228:04:31, 21 December 2022 (UTC) 2210:18:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC) 2147:Can we add a translation for 2094:12:31, 30 December 2022 (UTC) 2080:09:35, 28 December 2022 (UTC) 2062:09:35, 28 December 2022 (UTC) 1989:14:42, 23 December 2022 (UTC) 1968:05:40, 23 December 2022 (UTC) 1950:05:40, 23 December 2022 (UTC) 1929:19:35, 20 December 2022 (UTC) 1915:04:59, 20 December 2022 (UTC) 1891:04:31, 21 December 2022 (UTC) 1873:19:32, 20 December 2022 (UTC) 1854:04:59, 20 December 2022 (UTC) 1754:15:00, 23 December 2022 (UTC) 1728:05:40, 23 December 2022 (UTC) 1710:04:31, 21 December 2022 (UTC) 1684:18:55, 20 December 2022 (UTC) 1661:04:07, 20 December 2022 (UTC) 1630:13:19, 30 December 2022 (UTC) 1603:04:31, 21 December 2022 (UTC) 1555:03:50, 20 December 2022 (UTC) 1511:03:50, 20 December 2022 (UTC) 1483:04:31, 21 December 2022 (UTC) 1469:You're welcome! Sounds good. 1465:18:35, 20 December 2022 (UTC) 1447:03:50, 20 December 2022 (UTC) 1160:17:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 1148:14:35, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 724:15:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 687:06:33, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 484:WikiProject Japan to do list: 324:This article is supported by 276:and see a list of open tasks. 2784:Old requests for peer review 1824:21:37, 5 February 2023 (UTC) 1810:15:39, 5 February 2023 (UTC) 1791:15:28, 5 February 2023 (UTC) 1574:09:33, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 1529:09:15, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 1416:17:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC) 2769:Knowledge featured articles 2244:19:48, 9 January 2023 (UTC) 2183:19:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC) 2165:05:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC) 2130:19:27, 9 January 2023 (UTC) 2116:04:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC) 2035:19:08, 9 January 2023 (UTC) 2016:04:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC) 1394:14:26, 23 August 2022 (UTC) 606:to articles that need them. 545:Featured content candidates 447:Knowledge:WikiProject Japan 2840: 2824:WikiProject Japan articles 2551:I think I handled this in 1374:10:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC) 1300:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1236:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 851:3a addresses major topics: 738:, where they are obviosly 540: 473:project's importance scale 450:Template:WikiProject Japan 308:project's importance scale 135:Featured article candidate 1094:16:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 1068:14:56, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 1050:14:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 1018:08:28, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 764:GA nomination spring 2007 479: 466: 363: 323: 301: 234: 207: 163: 71: 67: 2809:Historic houses articles 1688:I didn't mean to remove 1227:11:54, 7 July 2016 (UTC) 1203:06:15, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 939:19:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 758:12:16, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 748:08:54, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 582:Good article nominations 265:WikiProject Architecture 61:Today's featured article 1232:External links modified 1188:09:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 883:4 netural and unbiased: 875:passes on this criteria 835:2c no original research 809:2a provides references: 154:Featured article review 2614:Genji Monogatari Emaki 965:2a provides references 518: 453:Japan-related articles 320: 189:This article is rated 517: 319: 288:Architecture articles 63:on December 18, 2007. 2191:Reverts and re-edits 1877:Looks good. Struck. 1281:regular verification 1172:user:205.202.240.119 640:an article from the 622:Japan-related stubs. 414:relevant discussions 116:Good article nominee 2738:Firefangledfeathers 2693:Firefangledfeathers 2659:Firefangledfeathers 2618:Firefangledfeathers 2590:Firefangledfeathers 2557:Firefangledfeathers 2553:this slight rewrite 2535:Firefangledfeathers 2513:Firefangledfeathers 2475:Firefangledfeathers 2453:Firefangledfeathers 2421:Firefangledfeathers 2383:Firefangledfeathers 2357:Firefangledfeathers 2325:Firefangledfeathers 2307:Firefangledfeathers 2282:Firefangledfeathers 2264:Firefangledfeathers 2216:Firefangledfeathers 2153:Firefangledfeathers 2104:Firefangledfeathers 2100:order of precedence 2068:Firefangledfeathers 2050:Firefangledfeathers 2004:Firefangledfeathers 1956:Firefangledfeathers 1938:Firefangledfeathers 1903:Firefangledfeathers 1879:Firefangledfeathers 1842:Firefangledfeathers 1779:Firefangledfeathers 1716:Firefangledfeathers 1698:Firefangledfeathers 1649:Firefangledfeathers 1591:Firefangledfeathers 1543:Firefangledfeathers 1499:Firefangledfeathers 1471:Firefangledfeathers 1435:Firefangledfeathers 1271:After February 2018 652:unassessed articles 418:lists of open tasks 408:, please visit the 257:Architecture portal 41:Knowledge community 1325:InternetArchiveBot 1276:InternetArchiveBot 642:Japanese Knowledge 628:requested articles 619:Improve and expand 611:Pages for Deletion 595:Godzilla Minus One 519: 321: 195:content assessment 128:September 24, 2007 72:Article milestones 2417:`This is the diff 1861:Heian-kyo#History 1539:MOS:FOREIGNITALIC 1376: 1364:comment added by 1301: 1099:Superfluous links 867:3b stays focused: 819:2b cites sources: 670: 669: 666: 665: 662: 661: 658: 657: 577: 576: 441: 402:-related articles 394:WikiProject Japan 342: 341: 338: 337: 175: 174: 171: 170: 2831: 2714: 2494:Ōtenmon Incident 2291: 1802: 1772: 1405: 1335: 1326: 1299: 1298: 1277: 1157: 1091: 1086: 1047: 1042: 980:2b cites sources 753:OK, no problem. 603:requested images 539: 538: 481: 455: 454: 451: 448: 445: 438: 436: 429: 388: 383: 382: 381: 372: 365: 364: 359: 351: 344: 290: 289: 286: 283: 280: 259: 254: 253: 243: 236: 235: 230: 227: 216: 209: 192: 186: 185: 177: 166:Featured article 164:Current status: 149: 130: 111: 92: 69: 56: 31:featured article 23: 16: 2839: 2838: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2759: 2758: 2710: 2289: 1901: 1856: 1800: 1766: 1674:"Avenue" part. 1424: 1399: 1382: 1344: 1329: 1324: 1292: 1285:have permission 1275: 1249:this simple FaQ 1234: 1211: 1168: 1155: 1135:User:Gryffindor 1110:List of palaces 1101: 1089: 1084: 1045: 1040: 982:: According to 950: 794:*1b MOS layout: 771: 766: 732: 675: 512: 469:High-importance 452: 449: 446: 443: 442: 432: 384: 379: 377: 358:High‑importance 357: 332:High-importance 304:High-importance 287: 284: 281: 278: 277: 255: 248: 229:High‑importance 228: 225:Historic houses 222: 193:on Knowledge's 190: 145: 126: 107: 88: 12: 11: 5: 2837: 2835: 2827: 2826: 2821: 2816: 2811: 2806: 2801: 2796: 2791: 2786: 2781: 2776: 2771: 2761: 2760: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2716: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2638: 2635: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2321: 2302: 2301: 2247: 2246: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2168: 2167: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2064: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2019: 2018: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1977: 1952: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1899: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1839: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1664: 1663: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1617: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1558: 1557: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1514: 1513: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1453: 1423: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1381: 1378: 1343: 1340: 1319: 1318: 1311: 1264: 1263: 1255:Added archive 1233: 1230: 1210: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1167: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1131: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1115: 1114: 1111: 1108: 1100: 1097: 1071: 1070: 1032:that archivist 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 994: 993: 992: 977: 962: 949: 942: 931:PocklingtonDan 929:Many thanks - 927: 926: 925: 924: 918: 917: 911: 910: 909: 908: 902: 901: 895: 894: 893: 892: 886: 885: 879: 878: 877: 876: 870: 869: 863: 862: 861: 860: 854: 853: 847: 846: 845: 844: 838: 837: 831: 830: 829: 828: 822: 821: 816: 815: 814: 805: 804: 803: 802: 791: 790: 789: 788: 782: 781: 770: 767: 765: 762: 761: 760: 731: 728: 727: 726: 711: 710: 709: 700:Proposed edit: 674: 671: 668: 667: 664: 663: 660: 659: 656: 655: 654: 653: 645: 632: 623: 615: 607: 598: 575: 574: 566: 559: 550: 549: 548: 537: 536: 532:A-class review 528: 511: 510: 505: 500: 495: 489: 486: 485: 477: 476: 465: 459: 458: 456: 390: 389: 373: 361: 360: 352: 340: 339: 336: 335: 322: 312: 311: 300: 294: 293: 291: 274:the discussion 261: 260: 244: 232: 231: 217: 205: 204: 198: 187: 173: 172: 169: 168: 161: 160: 157: 150: 147:March 11, 2023 142: 141: 138: 131: 123: 122: 119: 112: 104: 103: 100: 93: 85: 84: 81: 78: 74: 73: 65: 64: 57: 49: 48: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2836: 2825: 2822: 2820: 2817: 2815: 2812: 2810: 2807: 2805: 2802: 2800: 2797: 2795: 2792: 2790: 2787: 2785: 2782: 2780: 2777: 2775: 2772: 2770: 2767: 2766: 2764: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2639: 2636: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2326: 2322: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2303: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2283: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2252: 2251: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1975: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1898: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1857: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1770: 1765: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1672: 1669:I would keep 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1618: 1615: 1611: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1587: 1586: 1581: 1580: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1535: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1431: 1429: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1403: 1402:Bumbubookworm 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1386:Bumbubookworm 1379: 1377: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1366:157.82.245.48 1363: 1357: 1352: 1348: 1339: 1338: 1333: 1328: 1327: 1316: 1312: 1309: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1296: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1272: 1267: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1237: 1231: 1229: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1165: 1161: 1158: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1136: 1127: 1123: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1112: 1109: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1098: 1096: 1095: 1092: 1087: 1081: 1076: 1069: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1048: 1043: 1035: 1033: 1029: 1019: 1016: 1012: 1007: 1003: 999: 995: 989: 985: 981: 978: 974: 970: 966: 963: 960: 959:1b MOS layout 957: 956: 954: 953: 952: 951: 947: 944:Submitted to 943: 941: 940: 936: 932: 922: 921: 920: 919: 916: 913: 912: 906: 905: 904: 903: 900: 897: 896: 890: 889: 888: 887: 884: 881: 880: 874: 873: 872: 871: 868: 865: 864: 858: 857: 856: 855: 852: 849: 848: 842: 841: 840: 839: 836: 833: 832: 826: 825: 824: 823: 820: 817: 812: 811: 810: 807: 806: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 786: 785: 784: 783: 780: 777: 776: 775: 768: 763: 759: 756: 752: 751: 750: 749: 746: 741: 737: 730:older entries 729: 725: 721: 717: 712: 707: 706: 701: 698: 697: 695: 691: 690: 689: 688: 684: 680: 672: 651: 650: 646: 644:into English. 643: 639: 638: 633: 630: 629: 624: 621: 620: 616: 613: 612: 608: 605: 604: 599: 597: 596: 591: 589: 584: 583: 579: 578: 573: 571: 570: 564: 563: 557: 556: 551: 546: 543: 542: 541: 534: 533: 529: 526: 525: 521: 520: 516: 509: 506: 504: 501: 499: 496: 494: 491: 490: 488: 487: 483: 482: 478: 474: 470: 464: 461: 460: 457: 440: 437: 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 401: 396: 395: 387: 376: 374: 371: 367: 366: 362: 356: 353: 350: 346: 333: 330:(assessed as 329: 328: 318: 314: 313: 309: 305: 299: 296: 295: 292: 275: 271: 267: 266: 258: 252: 247: 245: 242: 238: 237: 233: 226: 221: 218: 215: 211: 206: 202: 196: 188: 184: 179: 178: 167: 162: 158: 156: 155: 151: 148: 144: 143: 139: 137: 136: 132: 129: 125: 124: 120: 118: 117: 113: 110: 109:July 18, 2007 106: 105: 101: 99: 98: 94: 91: 87: 86: 82: 79: 76: 75: 70: 66: 62: 58: 55: 51: 50: 46: 42: 38: 37: 32: 28: 25: 22: 18: 17: 2286: 2260:SandyGeorgia 2253: 2249: 2248: 2190: 2189: 2148: 2141: 2140: 2042: 2041: 1996: 1995: 1973: 1833: 1832: 1797: 1775:Template:Sfn 1737: 1733: 1693: 1689: 1670: 1644: 1643:Can we drop 1637: 1636: 1584: 1490: 1489: 1432: 1425: 1383: 1360:— Preceding 1355: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1323: 1320: 1295:source check 1274: 1268: 1265: 1241:Heian Palace 1238: 1235: 1214: 1212: 1169: 1132: 1116: 1113:Ōmiya Palace 1102: 1072: 1060: 1056: 1036: 1031: 1024: 1001: 997: 987: 979: 968: 964: 958: 928: 914: 898: 882: 866: 850: 834: 818: 808: 793: 792: 778: 772: 739: 733: 703: 699: 676: 647: 635: 626: 625:Create some 617: 609: 601: 593: 588:Vinland Saga 587: 580: 567: 560: 553: 552: 544: 530: 522: 468: 430: 410:project page 398: 392: 386:Japan portal 325: 303: 279:Architecture 270:Architecture 263: 220:Architecture 201:WikiProjects 165: 152: 133: 115: 114: 95: 90:May 26, 2007 45:please do so 34: 27:Heian Palace 26: 2379:this source 2214:Excellent. 1614:Nagaoka-kyō 1380:FA concerns 1107:Kyoto Gosho 673:Link freeze 590:(TV series) 524:Peer review 406:participate 97:Peer review 2763:Categories 2419:to check. 2200:). Added. 2043:Daigokuden 1974:sato-dairi 1422:Fffeedback 1332:Report bug 1219:Gryffindor 1156:Gryffindor 1065:SidiLemine 716:Ooperhoofd 416:, and see 36:identified 2250:Last bits 2149:Burakuden 2142:Buraku-in 1610:Heian-kyō 1315:this tool 1308:this tool 1011:GA review 946:GA Review 899:5 stable: 736:Suzakumon 705:Daijō-kan 694:Daijō-kan 637:translate 2746:contribs 2736:Thanks! 2701:contribs 2667:contribs 2626:contribs 2598:contribs 2565:contribs 2543:contribs 2521:contribs 2483:contribs 2461:contribs 2429:contribs 2391:contribs 2365:contribs 2333:contribs 2315:contribs 2272:contribs 2224:contribs 2161:contribs 2112:contribs 2076:contribs 2058:contribs 2012:contribs 1997:Chōdō-in 1964:contribs 1946:contribs 1911:contribs 1887:contribs 1850:contribs 1787:contribs 1724:contribs 1706:contribs 1657:contribs 1638:Location 1616:itself). 1599:contribs 1551:contribs 1507:contribs 1479:contribs 1443:contribs 1362:unsigned 1321:Cheers.— 1215:Daidairi 562:Pictures 555:Articles 191:FA-class 140:Promoted 102:Reviewed 2290:Georgia 1834:History 1801:Georgia 1491:Overall 1356:Nichope 1245:my edit 1209:rename? 1028:WP:GA/R 986:again, 984:WP:CITE 973:WP:CITE 769:GA fail 572:: None 565:: None 558:: None 498:history 471:on the 435:Refresh 306:on the 80:Process 2724:Stca74 2677:Stca74 2643:Stca74 2576:Stca74 2498:Stca74 2439:Stca74 2401:Stca74 2343:Stca74 2256:Stca74 2236:Stca74 2202:Stca74 2175:Stca74 2122:Stca74 2086:Stca74 2027:Stca74 1981:Stca74 1921:Stca74 1865:Stca74 1816:Stca74 1769:Stca74 1746:Stca74 1742:Berlin 1676:Stca74 1622:Stca74 1566:Stca74 1521:Stca74 1457:Stca74 1428:Stca74 1195:Stca74 1180:Stca74 1140:Tenmei 1015:Stca74 1006:Aikido 745:Stca74 679:Rankun 649:Assess 535:: None 527:: None 197:scale. 121:Listed 83:Result 2287:Sandy 1798:Sandy 1408:Z1720 1075:WP:GA 634:Help 569:Lists 508:purge 503:watch 444:Japan 426:Reiwa 400:Japan 355:Japan 29:is a 2742:talk 2728:talk 2720:this 2712:edit 2697:talk 2681:talk 2663:talk 2647:talk 2622:talk 2594:talk 2580:talk 2561:talk 2539:talk 2517:talk 2502:talk 2479:talk 2457:talk 2443:talk 2425:talk 2405:talk 2387:talk 2361:talk 2347:talk 2329:talk 2311:talk 2295:Talk 2268:talk 2240:talk 2220:talk 2206:talk 2179:talk 2157:talk 2126:talk 2108:talk 2090:talk 2072:talk 2054:talk 2031:talk 2008:talk 1985:talk 1960:talk 1942:talk 1925:talk 1907:talk 1883:talk 1869:talk 1846:talk 1820:talk 1806:Talk 1783:talk 1750:talk 1720:talk 1702:talk 1680:talk 1653:talk 1626:talk 1595:talk 1570:talk 1547:talk 1525:talk 1503:talk 1475:talk 1461:talk 1439:talk 1412:talk 1390:talk 1370:talk 1223:talk 1199:talk 1184:talk 1176:talk 1144:talk 1090:Love 1085:Lara 1046:Love 1041:Lara 1000:and 935:talk 740:also 720:talk 683:talk 600:Add 493:edit 463:High 298:High 159:Kept 77:Date 2297:) 2254:Hi 1808:) 1738:ōji 1734:ōji 1694:ōji 1690:ōji 1671:ōji 1645:ōji 1426:Hi 1358:) 1289:RfC 1259:to 1057:not 755:Fg2 428:6) 422:JST 2765:: 2748:) 2744:/ 2730:) 2703:) 2699:/ 2683:) 2669:) 2665:/ 2649:) 2628:) 2624:/ 2600:) 2596:/ 2582:) 2567:) 2563:/ 2545:) 2541:/ 2523:) 2519:/ 2504:) 2485:) 2481:/ 2463:) 2459:/ 2445:) 2431:) 2427:/ 2407:) 2393:) 2389:/ 2367:) 2363:/ 2349:) 2335:) 2331:/ 2317:) 2313:/ 2274:) 2270:/ 2242:) 2226:) 2222:/ 2208:) 2181:) 2163:) 2159:/ 2128:) 2114:) 2110:/ 2102:? 2092:) 2078:) 2074:/ 2060:) 2056:/ 2033:) 2014:) 2010:/ 1987:) 1966:) 1962:/ 1948:) 1944:/ 1927:) 1913:) 1909:/ 1889:) 1885:/ 1871:) 1852:) 1848:/ 1822:) 1789:) 1785:/ 1752:) 1726:) 1722:/ 1708:) 1704:/ 1682:) 1659:) 1655:/ 1628:) 1601:) 1597:/ 1572:) 1553:) 1549:/ 1541:. 1527:) 1509:) 1505:/ 1481:) 1477:/ 1463:) 1445:) 1441:/ 1414:) 1392:) 1372:) 1302:. 1297:}} 1293:{{ 1225:) 1201:) 1186:) 1146:) 1138:-- 1080:FA 1013:. 1002:2b 998:2a 969:is 937:) 722:) 696:? 685:) 592:, 585:: 547:– 424:, 334:). 223:: 2740:( 2726:( 2695:( 2679:( 2661:( 2645:( 2620:( 2592:( 2578:( 2559:( 2537:( 2515:( 2500:( 2477:( 2455:( 2441:( 2423:( 2403:( 2385:( 2359:( 2345:( 2327:( 2309:( 2293:( 2266:( 2238:( 2218:( 2204:( 2177:( 2155:( 2124:( 2106:( 2088:( 2070:( 2052:( 2029:( 2006:( 1983:( 1958:( 1940:( 1923:( 1905:( 1881:( 1867:( 1844:( 1818:( 1804:( 1781:( 1771:: 1767:@ 1748:( 1718:( 1700:( 1678:( 1651:( 1624:( 1593:( 1568:( 1545:( 1523:( 1501:( 1473:( 1459:( 1437:( 1410:( 1404:: 1400:@ 1388:( 1368:( 1334:) 1330:( 1317:. 1310:. 1221:( 1197:( 1182:( 1174:( 1142:( 1061:I 933:( 718:( 681:( 631:. 475:. 439:) 431:( 310:. 203:: 47:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index