348:
870:, or a nonstandard model, which may contain nonstandard natural numbers. Thus "a kind of natural numbers" would be a set of models of PA (of given kind), while "a kind of natural number" would be a set of numbers. Therefore the practice of using both expressions equivalently is inconsistent, lacks logic, is due to poor education, and should be discouraged. In particular wikipedia should always favor "granny smith is a kind of apple", and here "In this kind of theory". I have not edited the page myself because my proposal may not gather consensus, but i'd be glad if senior editors welcome it.
284:
874:
property of being green", but not "a granny smith has the kind of being green". In other words "property x of thing X" is manipulated as an element of X, while "kind x of X" is manipulated as the set of all things X with a given property. This is reflected in the fact that we can read "a property of theories" as an ellipse of "a property of some apples" -but "a kind of some apples" is never used and would not be readily interpreted by most people.
507:
462:
338:
317:
568:
426:
244:
946:
states, "All particles are excitations of their corresponding fields". There is a logical link that being skipped over. I don't understand what this comment means. For instance, I understand that a photon is produced when an electron drops to a lower energy state. What is the missing conceptual leap to the comment that is implied in most discussions of particles in this page?
478:
275:
598:
889:
Addendum: Reading the article further i found the expression « an unusual type of field », which follows the rules i proposed above -"type" being a synonym of "kind", with equivalent grammar. It thus appears that the expression « these kinds of theories » was not carefully decided, and i propose that
873:
One could argue that "a property of theories" and "a property of a theory" are equivalent, and that so should be "a kind of theories" and "a kind of theory". But i think not because a property is viewed and used as possessed by some thing, as an element of some thing. One says "a granny smith has the
783:
Is there any possibility for this page to be a good article, or a featured article maybe? The article seems fine, maybe even enough to be a good article. I don't know much about physics, therefore I just wanted to see the opinions of the
Wikipedians on this article, and if possible, brainstorm if
945:
Overview of Higgs boson and field properties
According to this paragraph, there must be 4 components. What are those components? In general, this page does a good job in explaining exotic concepts. Would any further explanations or details help? As a comment above about the meaning of particles
811:
I think the use of singular for the 1st expression, "this kind" instead of "these kinds", is consensual, so i will argue on the 2nd point. I know that it is customary in english to use "kind of apple" and "kind of apples" as exactly equivalent expressions but i argue that this is wrong. From a
807:
one can read: « In these kinds of theories ». This choice of expression is poor english and arguably wrong: it should be two singulars -counting the determiner+noun pair as a single expression- instead of two plurals. 1 "this kind", because there is only one kind of theory (the gauge invariant
751:
As the article indicates, there were six names on the PRL paper. As well as I know, it is usual to name things, more generally than physics, after one or two people, but not more. Bose-Einstein statistics gives us boson, not bose-einsteinons. Someone once noted that successful presidential
808:
theories described in the 1st paragraph) and 2 "theory", because "theories" means "a set of theories", so a "kind of theories" is a set of sets of theories satisfying some property. But gauge invariance is a property of a theory (not of a set of theories).
166:
989:
812:
logical perspective plural refers to the set of all things with some property. For instance "natural numbers" refers to a model of Peano arithmetic, eg the set of standard natural numbers,
979:
868:
1024:
288:
994:
1009:
235:
1019:
491:
404:
160:
92:
974:
1029:
1014:
925:
All particles are excitations of their corresponding fields. That's what "particle" means in quantum field theory. Nothing special about the Higgs. --
1004:
394:
98:
984:
347:
370:
688:
452:
43:
57:
579:
112:
999:
447:
117:
33:
915:
361:
322:
87:
969:
910:
is that the higgs boson is simply a quantum excitation of the higgs field; it is not a particle. The lead should reflect this.
645:
This page should be renamed Brout-Englert-Higgs boson to reflect the simultaneous discovery as recognized by the Nobel comitee
297:
203:
78:
181:
727:
Knowledge (XXG) uses the most common name, and that's "Higgs boson" (and "Higgs mechanism") without any doubt. See e.g.
148:
548:
911:
732:
544:
752:
candidates have easy to pronounce names. It might be that Higgs was easier than the others. In any case, it is the
461:
243:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
198:
484:
122:
789:
254:
815:
683:
753:
303:
142:
716:
708:
623:
552:
68:
369:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
138:
83:
728:
785:
438:
274:
711:. You will need to provide evidence that Brout-Englert-Higgs boson is the term most commonly used.
671:
670:
I've not seen any sources that call it anything other than the Higgs boson or the "God particle". –
658:
650:
631:
188:
174:
947:
584:
891:
875:
712:
259:
425:
951:
630:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
64:
895:
879:
610:
506:
256:
704:
515:
154:
761:
700:
654:
646:
353:
963:
930:
740:
804:
337:
316:
37:
567:
343:
757:
707:, Knowledge (XXG) articles use the most commonly used name for a topic. See
574:
483:
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
432:
543:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
926:
736:
618:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
366:
258:
431:
A news item involving Higgs boson was featured on
Knowledge (XXG)'s
955:
934:
919:
899:
883:
793:
784:
this article in a shape that is adequate for a nomination. Cheers,
765:
744:
720:
694:
662:
592:
562:
501:
472:
420:
268:
260:
28:
15:
460:
990:
Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles in
Physical sciences
573:
A fact from this article was featured on
Knowledge (XXG)'s
173:
818:
365:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
980:
Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in
Physical sciences
890:we harmonize the language choice to two singulars.
805:
Higgs boson#Gauge invariant theories and symmetries
187:
862:
1025:Knowledge (XXG) articles that use British English
46:for general discussion of the article's subject.
8:
857:
827:
995:B-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
1020:Pages in the Knowledge (XXG) Top 25 Report
1010:B-Class physics articles of Top-importance
863:{\displaystyle \mathbb {N} =\{0,1,2,...\}}
519:, which has its own spelling conventions (
311:
820:
819:
817:
703:, as I said after I undid your move of
313:
272:
975:Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles
941:"three components of the Higgs field"
551:, this should not be changed without
7:
1015:Knowledge (XXG) In the news articles
803:In the 2nd paragraph of the section
359:This article is within the scope of
487:. The week in which this happened:
379:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Physics
302:It is of interest to the following
36:for discussing improvements to the
1030:Selected anniversaries (July 2014)
14:
63:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
622:] The anchor (#Full operation)
596:
566:
505:
476:
443:section on the following dates:
424:
346:
336:
315:
282:
273:
242:
58:Click here to start a new topic.
1005:Top-importance physics articles
756:, whether it should be or not.
399:This article has been rated as
985:B-Class level-4 vital articles
956:15:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
935:08:45, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
920:08:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
1:
373:and see a list of open tasks.
55:Put new text under old text.
382:Template:WikiProject Physics
900:14:49, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
884:14:19, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
766:00:33, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
745:11:59, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
721:23:19, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
695:22:19, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
663:19:51, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
1046:
405:project's importance scale
776:Good or featured article?
398:
331:
310:
93:Be welcoming to newcomers
22:Skip to table of contents
1000:B-Class physics articles
794:12:53, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
21:
799:Two points of semantics
970:B-Class vital articles
912:TheRealBalalaikaMaster
864:
466:
88:avoid personal attacks
865:
492:October 6 to 12, 2013
464:
296:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
289:level-4 vital article
236:Auto-archiving period
113:Neutral point of view
816:
549:relevant style guide
545:varieties of English
118:No original research
547:. According to the
362:WikiProject Physics
860:
467:
298:content assessment
99:dispute resolution
60:
641:renaming the page
638:
637:
613:in most browsers.
591:
590:
559:
558:
500:
499:
471:
470:
419:
418:
415:
414:
411:
410:
267:
266:
79:Assume good faith
56:
27:
26:
1037:
906:My understanding
869:
867:
866:
861:
823:
780:Hello everyone,
691:
686:
632:Reporting errors
624:has been deleted
600:
599:
593:
570:
563:
512:This article is
509:
502:
480:
479:
473:
428:
421:
387:
386:
385:physics articles
383:
380:
377:
356:
351:
350:
340:
333:
332:
327:
319:
312:
295:
286:
285:
278:
277:
269:
261:
247:
246:
237:
192:
191:
177:
108:Article policies
29:
16:
1045:
1044:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1036:
1035:
1034:
960:
959:
943:
908:
814:
813:
801:
786:Harald the Bard
778:
705:Higgs mechanism
689:
684:
643:
634:
616:
615:
614:
597:
553:broad consensus
516:British English
496:
477:
465:Knowledge (XXG)
457:
384:
381:
378:
375:
374:
352:
345:
325:
293:
283:
263:
262:
257:
234:
134:
129:
128:
127:
104:
74:
12:
11:
5:
1043:
1041:
1033:
1032:
1027:
1022:
1017:
1012:
1007:
1002:
997:
992:
987:
982:
977:
972:
962:
961:
942:
939:
938:
937:
907:
904:
903:
902:
859:
856:
853:
850:
847:
844:
841:
838:
835:
832:
829:
826:
822:
800:
797:
777:
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
754:WP:COMMMONNAME
749:
725:
697:
668:
642:
639:
636:
635:
629:
628:
627:
611:case-sensitive
605:
604:
603:
601:
589:
588:
571:
557:
556:
510:
498:
497:
495:
494:
488:
481:
469:
468:
458:
456:
455:
453:8 October 2013
450:
444:
429:
417:
416:
413:
412:
409:
408:
401:Top-importance
397:
391:
390:
388:
371:the discussion
358:
357:
354:Physics portal
341:
329:
328:
326:Top‑importance
320:
308:
307:
301:
279:
265:
264:
255:
253:
252:
249:
248:
194:
193:
131:
130:
126:
125:
120:
115:
106:
105:
103:
102:
95:
90:
81:
75:
73:
72:
61:
52:
51:
48:
47:
41:
25:
24:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1042:
1031:
1028:
1026:
1023:
1021:
1018:
1016:
1013:
1011:
1008:
1006:
1003:
1001:
998:
996:
993:
991:
988:
986:
983:
981:
978:
976:
973:
971:
968:
967:
965:
958:
957:
953:
949:
940:
936:
932:
928:
924:
923:
922:
921:
917:
913:
905:
901:
897:
893:
888:
887:
886:
885:
881:
877:
871:
854:
851:
848:
845:
842:
839:
836:
833:
830:
824:
809:
806:
798:
796:
795:
791:
787:
781:
775:
767:
763:
759:
755:
750:
748:
747:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
724:
723:
722:
718:
714:
713:StarryGrandma
710:
709:WP:COMMONNAME
706:
702:
698:
696:
692:
687:
681:
680:
677:
674:
669:
667:
666:
665:
664:
660:
656:
652:
648:
640:
633:
625:
621:
620:
619:
612:
608:
602:
595:
594:
586:
582:
581:
576:
572:
569:
565:
564:
561:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
517:
511:
508:
504:
503:
493:
490:
489:
486:
485:Top 25 Report
482:
475:
474:
463:
459:
454:
451:
449:
446:
445:
442:
441:
440:
434:
430:
427:
423:
422:
406:
402:
396:
393:
392:
389:
372:
368:
364:
363:
355:
349:
344:
342:
339:
335:
334:
330:
324:
321:
318:
314:
309:
305:
299:
291:
290:
280:
276:
271:
270:
251:
250:
245:
241:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
200:
196:
195:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
133:
132:
124:
123:Verifiability
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
110:
109:
100:
96:
94:
91:
89:
85:
82:
80:
77:
76:
70:
66:
65:Learn to edit
62:
59:
54:
53:
50:
49:
45:
39:
35:
31:
30:
23:
20:
18:
17:
944:
909:
872:
810:
802:
782:
779:
678:
675:
672:
644:
617:
609:Anchors are
606:
585:July 4, 2014
578:
560:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
513:
437:
436:
400:
360:
304:WikiProjects
287:
239:
197:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
107:
32:This is the
583:section on
580:On this day
514:written in
448:4 July 2012
439:In the news
161:free images
44:not a forum
38:Higgs boson
964:Categories
701:Npettiaux
655:npettiaux
647:npettiaux
575:Main Page
525:travelled
433:Main Page
292:is rated
101:if needed
84:Be polite
34:talk page
537:artefact
199:Archives
69:get help
42:This is
40:article.
948:Cvhorie
673:Laundry
577:in the
541:analyse
533:defence
435:in the
403:on the
376:Physics
367:Physics
323:Physics
294:B-class
240:90 days
167:WP refs
155:scholar
892:Plm203
876:Plm203
529:centre
521:colour
300:scale.
139:Google
729:ATLAS
676:Pizza
281:This
204:Index
182:JSTOR
143:books
97:Seek
952:talk
931:talk
916:talk
896:talk
880:talk
790:talk
762:talk
758:Gah4
741:talk
735:. --
731:and
717:talk
659:talk
651:talk
607:Tip:
175:FENS
149:news
86:and
927:mfb
737:mfb
733:CMS
395:Top
189:TWL
966::
954:)
933:)
918:)
898:)
882:)
792:)
764:)
743:)
719:)
693:)
690:c̄
679:03
661:)
653:)
539:,
535:,
531:,
527:,
523:,
238::
230:,
226:,
222:,
218:,
214:,
210:,
206:,
169:)
67:;
950:(
929:(
914:(
894:(
878:(
858:}
855:.
852:.
849:.
846:,
843:2
840:,
837:1
834:,
831:0
828:{
825:=
821:N
788:(
760:(
739:(
715:(
699:@
685:d
682:(
657:(
649:(
626:.
587:.
555:.
407:.
306::
232:7
228:6
224:5
220:4
216:3
212:2
208:1
201::
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
71:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.