Knowledge

Talk:High tech

Source 📝

71: 53: 81: 22: 319:
produce machines that have no instances in the natural world, while the 'technology of naturoids' aims to re-produce technologically things that reside in nature. Nevertheless, both are technological traditions and that of naturoids is today strictly linked to the so-called Hi-Tech. Massimo Negrotti, University of Urbino.
141:
Computer Science is listed as a technology sector. I don't think this is fitting. This is basically like listing Biology or Chemistry as a technology sector. Computer Science is the study of computing which is applicable to engineering tools in various technology sectors. I'm going to remove Computer
371:
Many countries and regions like United States, Singapore, Canada, Greece, Italy, Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands, Norway, Ireland, Iceland, Israel, Japan, the United Kingdom, Estonia, Australia, Germany, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Finland, Spain, Sweden, Brazil and France can be in general
255:
The above sentence only applies for certain technologies. 1960's spacecraft, jet aircraft (the fastest military jet fighter is a 60s design), nuclear power, etc. are still relatively high tech today. The most extreme example would be manned space exploration as we have slided backwards into 1940s
318:
As the author of the 'theory of naturoids' ('before named 'theory of the artificial') I do not agree. It is obvious that not all Hi-Tech devices are naturoids. In fact, the theory says that the technology (and its history) has a double, alternate teleology: the 'conventional technology' aims to
271:
Certain nuclear technologies are missing. Aircraft goes back to the Wrights who were quite high tech for their day, and they in turn influenced computing (computers were made in Ohio up to the 1980s; we hear and read a very biased history of computing), and those firms spread through the USA and
629:
Further analysis from OECD shows that using research intensity as an industry classification indicator is also possible. The OECD does not only take the manufacturing but also the usage rate of technology into account. The OECD's classification is as follows (stable since 1973):
615:. There are several high technology definitions that can be found. Moreover, there are many problems with identifying high technology. There are large diversity of definitions that are used. Here is a short overview of a number of different techniques to define high technology. 454:
The paragraph beginning with "Like Big Science..." doesn't really read like an encyclopedia entry, it's kind of verbose and doesn't give very much information. Also "if investment exceeds potential... investors can lose most of their investment." Uh... yeah, obviously.
397:
Ditto the comment. Were the citation to include the names of say the G20 nations, etc. I could see that. A small slight is New Zealand (part of UKUSA). I have visited the Swiss technology park. Korea and Singapore are missing. Get a citation.
495:. When they pointed out the advanced work done in the USA, they cited the Defense Dept. when most Americans and others thought it was all consumer electronics. The response was more than just the USA and Japan but also initiatives like 761:
Furthermore, OECD’s product-based classification supports the technology intensity approach. It can be concluded that companies in a high-tech industry do not necessarily produce high-tech products and vice versa. This creates an
345:"As of 2006, any technology from the year 2000 onward may be considered high tech." wHY? i WOULD VENTURE TO GUESS THAT THERE are some decidely low-tech inventions from the period 2000=2009; there certainly were in the '90s. 168:
It seems odd that the page is headed with a section on origins. Protocol would be a definition of high-tech heading the page, with origins as a leading sub-section. Is someone better qualified than me willing to write this?
500: 210:
When and how did the term originate? It happened sometime between the 1960s (when it was unheard of) and the 1990s (when it became common). I think that one indication of this is that MIT was
891:
Move the title to High technology according to the lede word. Also the title of Low tech is "Low technology". So, I think the title should be moved from High tech to High technology.
379:
Do we have any citations? Why, for example, was Switzerland not included? Did the author include them in this order like this for a reason? Should they be re-orded to be alphabetic?
618: 575:. Thus a multinational corporation might work on a project 24 hours a day, with teams waking and working with the advance of the sun across the globe; such projects might be in 226:
The band Love released an album called Cybertracks in 1966 with the words "HI-TECH ELECTRONIC MUSIC" on the cover. It's not definitive, but I mention it in case it helps.
556:; However, if investment exceeds actual potential, as has happened in the past, then investors can lose all or most of their investment. High tech is often viewed as high 642: 541:
develops or uses the most advanced technology known, it is often seen as having the most potential for future growth. This perception has led to high
919: 300:. My concern is that it is inappropriate to include a link to every article that describes something that someone might regard as "high tech." — 821: 383: 103: 487:
among the agencies. But this also shows an English/European language bias. This would pointed out in the 1980s by the Japanese during their
914: 257: 233: 149: 326: 507: 418:
Even though the abbreviation 'high tech' is now more common, surely the article should be given the full name 'high technology'? Cf
399: 273: 777:
The sector approach classifies industries according their technology intensity, product approach according to finished products.
94: 58: 252:"so products hyped as high tech in the 1960s would now be considered, if not exactly low tech, then at least somewhat obsolete" 571:, high technology is an international phenomenon, spanning continents, epitomized by the worldwide communication of the 33: 435:
I don't think so per WP:COMMONNAME. And "Low technology" is used more often, I've never heard or read "Low tech".--
896: 866: 488: 462: 387: 261: 153: 796: 330: 237: 174: 511: 458: 403: 277: 826: 193: 170: 39: 892: 816: 576: 440: 322: 229: 145: 189: 21: 791: 763: 608: 102:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
861: 580: 561: 526: 350: 218: 479:
One would think that a person writing using the internet as a communication medium would note
297: 289: 86: 877: 786: 612: 604: 307: 841: 831: 553: 546: 436: 426: 364:
What criteria were used to define the examples in he following excerpt from the article?
856: 836: 811: 419: 476:
It's somewhat possible to tell that a young nonhistorian/non-technologist wrote this.
70: 52: 908: 806: 346: 215: 873: 596: 568: 301: 801: 542: 422: 99: 80: 76: 506:
So yes, this reinforces that at best a C-class article. This author concurs.
846: 781: 584: 538: 851: 587:
of a multinational corporation might thus employ, successively, teams in
572: 549: 592: 600: 588: 496: 480: 900: 881: 603:, with the only requirement fluency in the mother tongue, be it 557: 515: 501:
European Strategic Program on Research in Information Technology
492: 484: 466: 444: 430: 407: 391: 372:
considered high-tech societies in relation to other countries...
354: 334: 312: 281: 265: 241: 221: 197: 178: 157: 15: 621:
has two different approaches: sector and product (industry).
296:
I'd like to avoid a revert war over the "See also" link to
214:
named the "Massachusetts Institute of High Technology."
529:. Please dn't restore without sourcing per BURDEN. 188:
I've reverted some vandalism on the origin section.
98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 472:Misses critical historical and bureaucratic points 683:Radio, television & communication equipment 545:in high-tech sectors of the economy. High-tech 716:Motor vehicles, trailers & semi-trailers 694:Office, accounting & computing machinery 672:Medical, precision & optical instruments 8: 143: 47: 632: 560:, but offering the opportunity for high 49: 19: 499:, and the continental equivalent name 822:Electrical and Electronic Engineering 705:Electrical machinery & apparatus 639:Total R&D-intensity (1999, in %) 7: 537:Because the high-tech sector of the 92:This article is within the scope of 727:Railroad & transport equipment 38:It is of interest to the following 650:Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals 625:Research and development intensity 14: 887:Move the title to High technology 738:Chemical & chemical products 112:Knowledge:WikiProject Technology 79: 69: 51: 20: 920:WikiProject Technology articles 360:Examples of high-tech societies 115:Template:WikiProject Technology 901:19:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 445:12:51, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 198:12:39, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 1: 516:21:20, 13 November 2014 (UTC) 408:21:51, 13 November 2014 (UTC) 282:21:54, 13 November 2014 (UTC) 106:and see a list of open tasks. 579:or in the development of an 431:10:34, 15 January 2014 (UTC) 355:13:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 313:23:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 266:05:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 222:18:05, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 915:C-Class Technology articles 867:Electromagnetic Engineering 552:receive a large portion of 936: 882:18:31, 13 March 2018 (UTC) 749:Machinery & equipment 661:Aircraft & spacecraft 467:04:30, 27 March 2014 (UTC) 450:Style in section "Economy" 489:Fifth Generation Computer 392:15:59, 19 July 2012 (UTC) 335:23:23, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 242:18:07, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 179:11:14, 11 July 2009 (UTC) 64: 46: 158:18:12, 9 June 2016 (UTC) 797:Artificial Intelligence 827:Information Technology 256:levels of technology. 95:WikiProject Technology 28:This article is rated 773:Technology sectors=== 817:Computer Engineering 577:software development 764:aggregation problem 288:"See also" link to 118:Technology articles 862:Telecommunications 581:integrated circuit 137:Technology sectors 34:content assessment 759: 758: 325:comment added by 232:comment added by 160: 148:comment added by 134: 133: 130: 129: 126: 125: 87:Technology portal 927: 787:Audio Technology 744:24 (excl. 2423) 633: 459:EndgameCondition 337: 244: 120: 119: 116: 113: 110: 89: 84: 83: 73: 66: 65: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 935: 934: 930: 929: 928: 926: 925: 924: 905: 904: 893:AimanAbir18plus 889: 842:Nuclear Physics 832:Medical devices 627: 554:venture capital 525:moved here per 523: 474: 452: 416: 384:194.217.113.187 362: 343: 320: 294: 250: 227: 208: 186: 166: 139: 117: 114: 111: 108: 107: 85: 78: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 933: 931: 923: 922: 917: 907: 906: 888: 885: 870: 869: 864: 859: 857:Semiconductors 854: 849: 844: 839: 837:Nanotechnology 834: 829: 824: 819: 814: 812:Bioinformatics 809: 804: 799: 794: 789: 784: 775: 774: 769: 757: 756: 753: 750: 746: 745: 742: 739: 735: 734: 731: 728: 724: 723: 720: 717: 713: 712: 709: 706: 702: 701: 698: 695: 691: 690: 687: 684: 680: 679: 676: 673: 669: 668: 665: 662: 658: 657: 654: 651: 647: 646: 640: 637: 636:Industry name 626: 623: 535: 534: 522: 519: 473: 470: 451: 448: 420:low technology 415: 412: 411: 410: 377: 376: 375: 374: 361: 358: 342: 339: 317: 293: 286: 285: 284: 249: 246: 207: 204: 202: 185: 182: 165: 162: 138: 135: 132: 131: 128: 127: 124: 123: 121: 104:the discussion 91: 90: 74: 62: 61: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 932: 921: 918: 916: 913: 912: 910: 903: 902: 898: 894: 886: 884: 883: 879: 875: 868: 865: 863: 860: 858: 855: 853: 850: 848: 845: 843: 840: 838: 835: 833: 830: 828: 825: 823: 820: 818: 815: 813: 810: 808: 807:Biotechnology 805: 803: 800: 798: 795: 793: 790: 788: 785: 783: 780: 779: 778: 772: 771: 770: 767: 765: 754: 751: 748: 747: 743: 740: 737: 736: 732: 729: 726: 725: 721: 718: 715: 714: 710: 707: 704: 703: 699: 696: 693: 692: 688: 685: 682: 681: 677: 674: 671: 670: 666: 663: 660: 659: 655: 652: 649: 648: 644: 641: 638: 635: 634: 631: 624: 622: 620: 616: 614: 610: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 565: 563: 559: 555: 551: 548: 544: 540: 532: 531: 530: 528: 520: 518: 517: 513: 509: 504: 502: 498: 494: 490: 486: 482: 477: 471: 469: 468: 464: 460: 456: 449: 447: 446: 442: 438: 433: 432: 428: 424: 421: 413: 409: 405: 401: 396: 395: 394: 393: 389: 385: 380: 373: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 359: 357: 356: 352: 348: 340: 338: 336: 332: 328: 324: 315: 314: 311: 310: 306: 303: 299: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 272:still exist. 270: 269: 268: 267: 263: 259: 258:203.184.2.147 253: 247: 245: 243: 239: 235: 234:66.194.184.34 231: 224: 223: 220: 217: 213: 205: 203: 200: 199: 195: 191: 183: 181: 180: 176: 172: 171:Eleanor White 163: 161: 159: 155: 151: 150:146.115.9.226 147: 136: 122: 105: 101: 97: 96: 88: 82: 77: 75: 72: 68: 67: 63: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 890: 871: 776: 768: 760: 628: 617: 566: 536: 524: 505: 478: 475: 457: 453: 434: 417: 381: 378: 370: 363: 344: 341:2000 cut-off 327:151.51.33.68 316: 308: 304: 295: 254: 251: 225: 211: 209: 201: 187: 167: 144:— Preceding 140: 93: 40:WikiProjects 597:Philippines 569:Big Science 550:enterprises 527:WP:PRESERVE 521:unsourced 1 508:67.161.7.73 400:67.161.7.73 321:—Preceding 274:67.161.7.73 228:—Preceding 164:Definition? 909:Categories 802:Automation 792:Automotive 609:Portuguese 585:help desks 543:investment 503:(ESPRIT). 437:Maxeto0910 142:Science. 109:Technology 100:technology 59:Technology 847:Photonics 782:Aerospace 533:Economy== 292:contested 190:Deviant83 184:Vandalism 852:Robotics 733:352+359 573:Internet 491:work by 423:Ben Finn 347:Kdammers 323:unsigned 298:Naturoid 290:Naturoid 230:unsigned 216:Dpbsmith 206:Origins? 146:unsigned 645:Rev. 3 613:English 605:Spanish 562:profits 547:startup 539:economy 248:Example 30:C-class 874:Jytdog 664:10.29 653:10.46 595:, the 593:Brazil 583:. The 309:ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 302:ℜob C. 219:(talk) 36:scale. 752:2.20 741:2.85 730:3.11 719:3.51 708:3.60 697:7.21 686:7.48 675:9.69 656:2423 601:India 599:, or 589:Kenya 567:Like 497:Alvey 481:DARPA 305:alias 897:talk 878:talk 667:353 643:ISIC 619:OECD 558:risk 512:talk 493:MITI 485:ARPA 463:talk 441:talk 427:talk 414:Name 404:talk 388:talk 351:talk 331:talk 278:talk 262:talk 238:talk 194:talk 175:talk 154:talk 872:-- 755:29 722:34 711:31 700:30 689:32 678:33 611:or 212:not 911:: 899:) 880:) 766:. 607:, 591:, 564:. 514:) 465:) 443:) 429:) 406:) 390:) 382:-- 353:) 333:) 280:) 264:) 240:) 196:) 177:) 156:) 895:( 876:( 510:( 483:/ 461:( 439:( 425:( 402:( 386:( 349:( 329:( 276:( 260:( 236:( 192:( 173:( 152:( 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Technology
WikiProject icon
icon
Technology portal
WikiProject Technology
technology
the discussion
unsigned
146.115.9.226
talk
18:12, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Eleanor White
talk
11:14, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Deviant83
talk
12:39, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Dpbsmith
(talk)
18:05, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
unsigned
66.194.184.34
talk
18:07, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
203.184.2.147
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.