Knowledge

Talk:Historical figure

Source 📝

776:
Moses, the cited source. I suppose it is possible to reconcile a view of history as a tale of great men with a view of it as a tale of the inevitable progress of ideas. But this section does not give enough about other philosophers' views. The note on Hitler's self-identification as a world-historical figure belongs somewhere in the article, but I am not sure if it is in this section. Ditto the note on politicians identifying themselves with historical figures of the past. I have been following the random approach of a Google "preview available" search to see what different books have to say about "historical figure", and putting that in where it fits, or starting new sections. That has the advantages of finding the main aspects of the subject that should be covered and of resolving the AfD discussion, but the drawback of giving a rather incoherent effect. The article may be reaching the stage where it needs a more deliberate approach, looking for sources that discuss specific aspects. I will probably keep tinkering for two or three days.
105: 274: 264: 243: 458: 437: 21: 159: 138: 380: 96: 797:
require strong support for its statements though, as some may disagree with them otherwise. But we risk the lead diverging from the rest of the article if it appears to stand by itself and I have seen this happen in other controversial cases. I have no clever solution to offer but just wanted to document the issue which may arise later at places like GA review.
352: 169: 610:"An 'istorical figure" is of course correct, as is "A historical figure". In the ex-colonies some people pronounce "Herb", short for "Her Bert", as if it were the French word "herbe" (air-b), but more like "urb" as in sub-urban. They would consider that "an herb" (an urb) is correct. I am not sure where this is leading. 500:
This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Knowledge's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary
775:
The sense I have - and I knew next to nothing about it before working on this article - is that Hegel saw the world-historical figure as appearing when the time was ripe, expressing the mind-spirit of the time. The figure has huge impact, but is bound to appear. The "representative man" idea is from
899:
as the lede pic . Since 2011 she's been used by a number of orgs as their no 1 historical figure to help get women more involved in tech, including editing wikipedia. As for including Muhammad in the lede rather than Jesus, its good to be aware that Jesus is not principally a historical figure, the
851:
at the front of this list but I have just removed this for several reasons. One is that the choice might be controversial and I don't want the article to be politicised. Another is that we don't want the lead to turn into a top ten, in which everyone's favourites jostle for attention. A third is
796:
The expanded lead was recently a summary of the rest of the article but now contains supporting citations. My general understanding is that citations are not normally expected in the lead, as it summarises the main body of the article, where the citations will usually appear. This article may
889:
ranked Muhammad as the world's no 1 most influential historical figure. Its goood to have ethnic as well as gender balance, and historically men were generally over represented in the public domain (women having instead dominion in the domestic sphere). Three is a better number than
916:
It looks like categories have been added to the main article but these are not addressed in the lead, such as "political appropriation" and "in branding." I think it could be helpful to rework the introductory section to reflect these additions.
553:
And, for a change, a DYK article looks like it's both of a good size and fully-expanded. So many DYK articles are just barely long enough to qualify, and clearly incomplete, that this is a welcome change. Well done, everybody!
852:
that adding another man tips the gender balance. Note that the picture of Lady Godiva has recently been moved down so that the lead picture is now a man, not a woman and that picture is then followed by a string of other
884:
IMO those who have done the hard work building up the body should have the most say in the wording of the lede. But for me it would be good to include Muhammad in the lede, for several reasons. Even the white nationalist
58: 844:. I was also concerned to ensure that we had some gender balance and so this would include a woman. Gender bias is something which the article comments upon and so we should be sensitive to this ourselves. 961: 535: 429: 52: 362: 679:). But now that the h in such words is pronounced, the distinction has become anomalous and will no doubt disappear in time. Meantime, speakers who like to say 733:
and so I added some material about Hegel's ideas to that. We should perhaps include some cross-linkage between that article and this and also do the same with
951: 991: 330: 320: 966: 812:
Agree. The citations can and probably should be dropped. I have seen some articles where the lead became a battlefield. That seems very unlikely here.
946: 730: 996: 976: 225: 215: 109: 758:". This seems to be something of a contradiction but I suppose it's mostly a matter of perspective - how one approaches and views their writings. 956: 425: 981: 296: 986: 574:
Let me be the first to identify what may become the most disputed aspect of the article: whether it should open with "A" or "An", i.e.
1001: 191: 971: 488: 287: 248: 73: 941: 40: 559: 182: 143: 491: 480: 118: 34: 864:
more than any of these examples and so, if we were to change the lead examples, those two might be a better pair.
585:
My understanding of general practise is that the first of these is more common now and that's what we see in the
555: 510: 358: 874: 802: 765: 709: 641: 600: 543: 521: 506: 30: 723:
I like this new section about the ideas of Hegel and others. Please note the coincidence that the article
905: 80: 395: 124: 756:
Hegel, Thomas Carlyle and others noted that the great historical figures were just representative men,
833: 675:
was formerly usual before an unaccented syllable beginning with h and is still often seen and heard (
484: 351: 95: 918: 870: 798: 761: 705: 637: 633: 596: 539: 66: 900:
living Christ is in fact still here with us today, imperceptible to most, but closer than breath.
295:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
190:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
922: 817: 781: 690: 615: 379: 46: 901: 411: 279: 867:
As this issue is likely to recur, I'm getting discussion started so that we can document it.
734: 704:
For the record, I note that we're now back at "A historical" and I endorse this reversion.
886: 853: 263: 242: 174: 677:
an historian, an hotel, an hysterical scene, an hereditary title, an habitual offender
935: 813: 777: 686: 611: 636:, for example. It seemed best to start a discussion to forestall any edit warring. 400: 896: 655: 841: 654:
My vote is for "A", since the aitch is not silent. That seems the simplest rule.
754:". In the section here, the two are shown to be pulling in the same direction, " 861: 856:. A fourth reason is undue weight or representation: the article focusses upon 415: 457: 476: 469: 292: 269: 164: 746: 725: 465: 390: 926: 909: 878: 821: 806: 785: 769: 713: 694: 645: 619: 604: 563: 547: 524: 752:
the concept counters the Great Man theory popularised by Thomas Carlyle...
632:
recently. Editors can be quite determined about this sort of issue - see
158: 137: 848: 837: 840:. I chose these originally as they were the first two examples in the 187: 509:
to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from
186:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of 857: 895:
To compensate on the gender balance issue, you could maybe have
452: 374: 346: 89: 15: 501:
if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
435: 683:
should not try to have it both ways by aspirating the h.
629: 586: 428:. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at 65: 291:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 430:
Template:Did you know nominations/Historical figure
737:, pulling the latter into the main body from the 479:. Therefore the article can be found at either 421:probably did not ride naked through the streets? 667:is used before all consonants except silent h ( 659: 79: 8: 962:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in History 449:2007-06-16 Automated pywikipediabot message 475:The article has content that is useful at 237: 132: 403:). The text of the entry was as follows: 361:on 12 October 2012 (UTC). The result of 505:Removing this tag will usually trigger 426:Knowledge:Recent additions/2012/October 239: 134: 93: 832:The current examples in the lead are 424:A record of the entry may be seen at 7: 285:This article is within the scope of 180:This article is within the scope of 952:Knowledge vital articles in History 123:It is of interest to the following 992:Top-importance Literature articles 658:opens his book with the following: 14: 967:C-Class vital articles in History 593:is a person who lived long ago." 513:and should not be re-added there. 436: 947:Knowledge level-5 vital articles 456: 378: 350: 305:Knowledge:WikiProject Literature 272: 262: 241: 167: 157: 136: 103: 94: 19: 997:Knowledge Did you know articles 977:Top-importance history articles 357:This article was nominated for 325:This article has been rated as 308:Template:WikiProject Literature 220:This article has been rated as 957:C-Class level-5 vital articles 1: 299:and see a list of open tasks. 200:Knowledge:WikiProject History 194:and see a list of open tasks. 982:WikiProject History articles 927:09:06, 29 October 2019 (UTC) 910:20:42, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 879:08:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 822:13:31, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 807:09:10, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 786:13:31, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 770:09:10, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 714:09:10, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 695:12:00, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 646:10:16, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 620:00:27, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 605:20:03, 19 October 2012 (UTC) 564:18:22, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 548:11:42, 19 October 2012 (UTC) 203:Template:WikiProject History 987:C-Class Literature articles 578:"A historical figure..." or 511:Category:Copy to Wiktionary 399:column on 28 October 2012 ( 1018: 581:"An historical figure...". 331:project's importance scale 226:project's importance scale 1002:Transwikied to Wiktionary 525:01:27, 16 June 2007 (UTC) 324: 257: 219: 152: 131: 972:C-Class history articles 389:appeared on Knowledge's 942:C-Class vital articles 685: 534:This article has been 441: 288:WikiProject Literature 847:Another editor added 792:Citations in the lead 729:was also recently at 439: 110:level-5 vital article 834:Florence Nightingale 828:Examples in the lead 628:Another editor made 556:Piledhigheranddeeper 634:Talk:Strand, London 522:CopyToWiktionaryBot 507:CopyToWiktionaryBot 464:This page has been 311:Literature articles 183:WikiProject History 669:a history, an hour 570:Indefinite article 442: 119:content assessment 719:Concept and usage 591:historical figure 536:nominated for DYK 518: 517: 514: 502: 446: 445: 412:historical figure 387:Historical figure 373: 372: 345: 344: 341: 340: 337: 336: 280:Literature portal 236: 235: 232: 231: 88: 87: 1009: 750:, I wrote that " 735:Great Man theory 504: 496: 460: 453: 438: 382: 375: 354: 347: 313: 312: 309: 306: 303: 282: 277: 276: 275: 266: 259: 258: 253: 245: 238: 208: 207: 206:history articles 204: 201: 198: 177: 172: 171: 170: 161: 154: 153: 148: 140: 133: 116: 107: 106: 99: 98: 90: 84: 83: 69: 23: 22: 16: 1017: 1016: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1008: 1007: 1006: 932: 931: 830: 794: 721: 572: 532: 451: 310: 307: 304: 301: 300: 278: 273: 271: 251: 205: 202: 199: 196: 195: 173: 168: 166: 146: 117:on Knowledge's 114: 104: 26: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1015: 1013: 1005: 1004: 999: 994: 989: 984: 979: 974: 969: 964: 959: 954: 949: 944: 934: 933: 930: 929: 913: 912: 892: 891: 854:dead white men 829: 826: 825: 824: 793: 790: 789: 788: 720: 717: 702: 701: 700: 699: 698: 697: 649: 648: 623: 622: 583: 582: 579: 571: 568: 567: 566: 531: 528: 516: 515: 503: 495: 474: 461: 450: 447: 444: 443: 433: 423: 422: 383: 371: 370: 363:the discussion 355: 343: 342: 339: 338: 335: 334: 327:Top-importance 323: 317: 316: 314: 297:the discussion 284: 283: 267: 255: 254: 252:Top‑importance 246: 234: 233: 230: 229: 222:Top-importance 218: 212: 211: 209: 192:the discussion 179: 178: 175:History portal 162: 150: 149: 147:Top‑importance 141: 129: 128: 122: 100: 86: 85: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1014: 1003: 1000: 998: 995: 993: 990: 988: 985: 983: 980: 978: 975: 973: 970: 968: 965: 963: 960: 958: 955: 953: 950: 948: 945: 943: 940: 939: 937: 928: 924: 920: 915: 914: 911: 907: 903: 898: 894: 893: 888: 883: 882: 881: 880: 876: 872: 868: 865: 863: 859: 855: 850: 845: 843: 839: 835: 827: 823: 819: 815: 811: 810: 809: 808: 804: 800: 791: 787: 783: 779: 774: 773: 772: 771: 767: 763: 759: 757: 753: 749: 748: 742: 740: 736: 732: 728: 727: 718: 716: 715: 711: 707: 696: 692: 688: 684: 682: 678: 674: 670: 666: 663: 657: 653: 652: 651: 650: 647: 643: 639: 635: 631: 627: 626: 625: 624: 621: 617: 613: 609: 608: 607: 606: 602: 598: 594: 592: 588: 580: 577: 576: 575: 569: 565: 561: 557: 552: 551: 550: 549: 545: 541: 537: 529: 527: 526: 523: 512: 508: 499: 493: 490: 486: 482: 478: 473: 471: 467: 462: 459: 455: 454: 448: 434: 431: 427: 420: 417: 414: 413: 409:... that the 408: 405: 404: 402: 398: 397: 392: 388: 384: 381: 377: 376: 368: 364: 360: 356: 353: 349: 348: 332: 328: 322: 319: 318: 315: 298: 294: 290: 289: 281: 270: 268: 265: 261: 260: 256: 250: 247: 244: 240: 227: 223: 217: 214: 213: 210: 193: 189: 185: 184: 176: 165: 163: 160: 156: 155: 151: 145: 142: 139: 135: 130: 126: 120: 112: 111: 101: 97: 92: 91: 82: 78: 75: 72: 68: 64: 60: 57: 54: 51: 48: 45: 42: 39: 36: 32: 29: 28:Find sources: 25: 18: 17: 902:FeydHuxtable 897:Ada Lovelace 869: 866: 846: 831: 795: 760: 755: 751: 745: 743: 738: 724: 722: 703: 680: 676: 672: 668: 664: 661: 660: 656:H. W. Fowler 595: 590: 584: 573: 533: 519: 497: 463: 418: 410: 407:Did you know 406: 396:Did you know 394: 386: 385:A fact from 366: 326: 286: 221: 181: 125:WikiProjects 108: 76: 70: 62: 55: 49: 43: 37: 27: 862:Joan of Arc 630:this change 587:first draft 466:transwikied 416:Lady Godiva 401:check views 53:free images 936:Categories 842:BBC source 477:Wiktionary 470:Wiktionary 419:(pictured) 302:Literature 293:Literature 249:Literature 747:Zeitgeist 741:section. 726:Zeitgeist 687:Haymatth2 662:a, an. 1. 440:Knowledge 391:Main Page 367:Snow Keep 113:is rated 919:Niortega 849:Muhammed 838:Napoleon 814:Aymatth2 778:Aymatth2 739:See also 612:Aymatth2 359:deletion 393:in the 329:on the 224:on the 197:History 188:History 144:History 115:C-class 59:WP refs 47:scholar 871:Warden 799:Warden 762:Warden 706:Warden 638:Warden 597:Warden 540:Warden 492:logs 2 489:logs 1 121:scale. 31:Google 858:Jesus 589:: "A 498:Note: 102:This 74:JSTOR 35:books 923:talk 906:talk 890:two. 887:Hart 875:talk 860:and 836:and 818:talk 803:talk 782:talk 766:talk 710:talk 691:talk 642:talk 616:talk 601:talk 560:talk 544:talk 494:.) 485:here 481:here 365:was 67:FENS 41:news 744:In 731:AFD 671:); 530:DYK 483:or 468:to 321:Top 216:Top 81:TWL 938:: 925:) 908:) 877:) 820:) 805:) 784:) 768:) 712:) 693:) 681:an 673:an 644:) 618:) 603:) 562:) 554:-- 546:) 538:. 520:-- 61:) 921:( 904:( 873:( 816:( 801:( 780:( 764:( 708:( 689:( 665:A 640:( 614:( 599:( 558:( 542:( 487:( 472:. 432:. 369:. 333:. 228:. 127:: 77:· 71:· 63:· 56:· 50:· 44:· 38:· 33:(

Index

Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

level-5 vital article
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
History
WikiProject icon
History portal
WikiProject History
History
the discussion
Top
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Literature
WikiProject icon
Literature portal
WikiProject Literature
Literature
the discussion
Top

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.