352:
331:
362:
201:
54:
546:
255:
234:
457:
436:
192:
21:
138:
467:
952:
who said "...So, to be honest, I'd also prefer previous version: history is better seen with some chronological order, not just 'Google', 'Microsoft', 'Mobile', etc. Old version was poorly sourced and not in a great shape, but you could read from the start and see what was developed when and where we
1126:
This combination of more user-created or edited content, and easy means of sharing content, such as via RSS widgets and video embedding, has led to many sites with a typical "Web 2.0" feel. They have articles with embedded video, user-submitted comments below the article, and RSS boxes to the side,
941:
who said "To be honest, I think it was better before. The sections were organized chronologically rather than topically, which makes more sense for a "History of" article. The rewritten version has lots of very short paragraphs and no images. The original version was perhaps too detailed in places
1055:
The content you added to the article is still present and the changes you proposed on Talk have been achieved. At the same time, I have taken into account the views expressed by other editors who said they preferred the prior version, preferred more extensive history, and did not agree with your
1291:
I stated on 2/8 that I wanted to make big changes. No response. I made big changes from 2/14-2/19. Again, no response. Two months later, Whizz40 more than doubles the size of this article in a matter of hours using unsourced text and I'm the one being irresponsible? I dare you to clarify your
1011:
I took into account your responses but your comments didn't overcome the issues raised by the other editors. As I said, I found your comments on Talk and the content you added to the article to be insightful and I have supported your overall aims for improving this article along with the
1234:
issues that need to be addressed. The idea that a small article with impeccable sourcing is better than a rambling one with sourcing issues is controversial and since you don't have a consensus of involved editors here for the impeccable path, that's not likely to happen.
1020:
article. In addition, I took into account the views of other editors. I believe we have improved all three articles for
Knowledge readers so I propose we celebrate that collective accomplishment which could not have been achieved by any one editor alone.
1903:
Following the introduction of the Web, several media formats based on discrete cosine transform (DCT) were introduced for practical media distribution and streaming over the Web, including the MPEG video format in 1991 and the JPEG image format in
882:
about your revamp of the
History section on the main WWW article to a more concise version, which referred to this article for the more extensive history. When editing this article, I took into account the comments at the peer review you requested
963:
who said "I had a quick glance and the difference isn't clear to me. A more extensive history would be nice. The existing text is accurate but a bit simplistic." To which you replied: "If you want more, there's
History of the World Wide
1423:
So, if there's no evidence that an editor has even looked at an article, then you are saying it's possible to surmise their intent and therefore declare their consensus? I've been in a few wiki disputes, but that's a new one for me. —
1310:
This sounds confrontational. I'm just trying to explain WP culture, not start a fight. I am happy to help further if you care to understand what's happened here from that perspective. If you just want to be right, I'm done here.
1374:
editors (myself, Artem.G, Whizz40, Rp, Volten001, and now Kvng) have found your changes to web-related articles wanting. That's as clear a consensus as I've ever seen for a minor content dispute in an obscure article.
887:
and sought to integrate this with the additions and improvements you made, which I found insightful. Overall, as editors, we have achieved an improvement to the article for readers, and that's what
Knowledge is about.
1688:
As its popularity increased through ease of use, incentives for commercial investment in the Web also grew. By the middle of 1994, the Web was outcompeting Gopher and the other other browsing systems for the
1759:
The text in italics above has now been reworded or replaced. The text above which you added is still in the article. The following citation supports the web began to enter everyday use in 1993-94:
1503:
949:
938:
884:
39:
1525:
Dot-com bubble deserves more coverage. What were some notable companies? Why did the bubble burst? How much effect did the bubble have on the development and popularization of the Web?
783:. No references to fictional stories from the turn of the previous century and no claims that China invented parallel computing algorithms before Americans. Any other red herrings? —
153:
1961:
1097:
has been making are a definite improvement and I encourage them to continue. It would be good to locate sources for the 2004–present section (and expand it greatly), but
743:
In 1996, Robin Li developed RankDex, the first Web search engine with a site-scoring algorithm for results page ranking, and received a US patent for the technology.
1202:
So, you're OK with copy/pasting entire sections of unsourced text and using unreliable sources, but you draw the line at sarcasm. Great principles, Rublov. —
1951:
563:
559:
1837:
1991:
1976:
1966:
953:
are now. And in current version I would just be confused after reading it, without understanding timelines that are necessary to a 'History of' article."
408:
313:
303:
1946:
418:
738:
In France and the United
Kingdom, videotex information systems called Prestel and Minitel provided information and services for users in their homes.
2006:
1736:
Do you see the difference? Each of those statements is backed by a relevant and verifiable citation. It's clear to the reader what was happening. —
1656:
As popularity increased through ease of use, investment incentives also grew until in the middle of 1994 the Web's popularity gained the upper hand.
1395:
You're being misleading. Most of those editors have never edited this article. Volten001 even admitted he made a mistake in reverting my changes. —
523:
513:
205:
1956:
1996:
903:
You deleted a lot of properly sourced text and added a lot of unsourced text. That's pretty much the opposite of what a good editor should do.
733:
The cultural impact of the Web was imagined even further back in a short story by E. M. Forster, "The
Machine Stops", first published in 1909.
2011:
1936:
1931:
1259:
I removed irrelevant text about stories from 1909 and JPEG and MPEG compression. That wasn't controversial. Whizz40 simply put it back in. —
1695:
279:
1661:
General use of the Web began in 1993–1994, when websites of general interest became available. Some notable websites were active by 1994.
172:. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see
1971:
942:
and sorely needed an update for recent history, but these problems could have been dealt with in situ instead of rewriting the article."
384:
80:
1986:
1536:
Needless to say, this section needs serious expansion for recent occurrences, probably in a new section. Some topics it should cover:
489:
75:
2001:
1881:
1226:, many experienced editors prefer an incremental approach to improving Knowledge articles. Rewrites usually carry a controversial
1277:
When you say "What are you talking about?" are you dismissing my comment or do need me to somehow clarify what I've said above? ~
74:
at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
30:
1981:
1941:
262:
239:
71:
375:
336:
1072:
480:
441:
169:
1838:
https://www.news-gazette.com/news/mosaic-started-web-rush-internet-boom/article_a459cd7f-dafe-5de4-a5fe-c3723a009af2.html
1385:
1189:
1115:
875:
214:
53:
1252:
Whizz40 did most of his edits in 1 day. I wouldn't even call them edits. He just copied large amounts of text from
1718:
We're going in circles. Those statements are all meaningless. That's why you can't find decent citations for them.
149:
572:
761:
Different readers will be looking for different aspects of the
History of the World Wide Web. See for example,
1409:
There's no requirement to have edited the article in order to contribute to consensus in a content dispute. ~
1032:
You simply reverted my edits to remove false and uncited information. How on earth is that an improvement? —
718:
50KB seems quite brief. In my experience, many, perhaps most, Good and
Featured articles are more than 50KB.
1172:
1017:
65:
1848:
275:
1339:
1152:
650:
220:
34:
1230:
aspect. Sure, let's look at the unsourced content and evaluate whether there are specific unacceptable
878:
to remove the sections specific to the history of the Web from that article and saw the discussion at
361:
351:
330:
1131:
I am honestly chuckling right now. You consider that to be an improvement? Good luck sourcing it. —
191:
1651:
The Web began to enter general use around 1994, when websites of general interest became available.
960:
931:
Your views expressed on Talk, at the peer reivew, and through the content you added to the article.
925:
879:
488:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
383:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
278:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1913:
1811:
1779:
1741:
1670:
1600:
1461:
1429:
1400:
1361:
1330:
1297:
1264:
1227:
1207:
1176:
1159:
1136:
1084:
1037:
1002:
911:
844:
816:
788:
780:
762:
752:
709:
673:
658:
635:
578:
1609:
Some points from 1994 are covered in both sections. I think the article flows better this way.
1878:
1797:
1764:
1709:
1628:
1614:
1578:
1370:
Against my better judgment I will weigh in here one more time to point out that no fewer than
1061:
1026:
988:
893:
830:
802:
770:
723:
691:
165:
997:
I responded to all of them. You ignored my comments. Why are you making false accusations? —
1872:
1565:
1381:
1185:
1111:
574:
545:
1917:
1815:
1801:
1783:
1768:
1745:
1713:
1674:
1632:
1618:
1604:
1582:
1465:
1451:
1433:
1418:
1404:
1390:
1365:
1351:
1334:
1320:
1301:
1286:
1268:
1244:
1211:
1194:
1163:
1140:
1120:
1088:
1065:
1041:
1006:
992:
915:
897:
848:
834:
820:
806:
792:
774:
756:
727:
713:
695:
677:
662:
639:
367:
576:
1447:
1414:
1347:
1316:
1282:
1240:
1013:
967:
701:
620:
472:
1925:
1909:
1807:
1775:
1737:
1666:
1596:
1457:
1439:
1425:
1396:
1357:
1326:
1307:
1293:
1274:
1260:
1223:
1203:
1168:
1155:
1132:
1098:
1080:
1076:
1033:
998:
907:
840:
812:
784:
748:
705:
669:
654:
631:
1694:
Websites for use by the general public began to emerge in 1993–1994, including some
811:
OK. So, why do you feel so strongly about videotex services from the 70s and 80s? —
1793:
1760:
1705:
1624:
1610:
1574:
1171:
sarcasm is not a constructive contribution to this conversation, and I don't think
1148:
1094:
1057:
1022:
984:
945:
889:
826:
798:
766:
719:
687:
797:
No strong views on including those two points in this article. Have removed them.
1724:
Popular compared to what? Other Internet protocols? Other hypertext applications?
765:, which has a much longer Background section before going into the topic itself.
1549:
1376:
1231:
1180:
1106:
934:
704:
recommends keeping articles under 50KB. I don't think that's an improvement. —
653:. So far, I have replaced the section on Tim Berners-Lee and CERN. More to come
254:
233:
1559:
1553:
462:
357:
1249:
What are you talking about? I spent 5 days rewriting the article (Feb 14-19).
1443:
1410:
1343:
1312:
1278:
1236:
271:
1730:
Mosaic was an immediate hit. Within a year, Web traffic surpassed Gopher's.
1177:
the edit in which you link the user's name must also include your signature
1325:
I've been a WP editor since 2005. What do you plan on explaining to me? —
456:
435:
1151:! I see you added a bunch of citations. Including a self-published ebook
380:
267:
1859:
1849:
https://www.minnpost.com/business/2016/08/rise-and-fall-gopher-protocol/
906:
I made proposals and sought input before making changes. You didn't. —
20:
1543:
1199:
Well, I tried being reasonable and we can see how well that worked out.
956:
485:
1774:
The word "web" does not appear anywhere on page 2 of your citation. —
1733:
Wired declared that Mosaic made non-Internet online services obsolete.
1513:
The lead should have a lot more information about the 2000s and 2010s.
1105:, which is not the case for most of the information in that section.
1073:
History_of_the_World_Wide_Web#2004–present:_Ubiquity,_Web_2.0,_Web3
649:
I’ve undertaken a major rewrite of this article. I have a draft at
484:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
1683:
Websites for use by the general public began to emerge in 1993–94.
624:
1874:
Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice
686:
Added and restored, with improvements, more extensive history.
595:
I'm gonna be making some additions. Just leaving some notes...
1253:
579:
539:
185:
132:
15:
1623:
Time periods in section headings are now mutually exclusive.
1154:. That's some cracker jack research. Keep up the good work!
1103:
it is doubtful any sources are available for the information
885:
Knowledge:Peer review/History of the World Wide Web/archive1
43:. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
1806:
I just searched again and you're correct. I apologize. —
928:. I took into account the views of all involved editors:
700:
You increased the size of the article from 30KB to 86KB.
379:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
1438:
There's no evidence they haven't reviewed the article;
975:
971:
177:
173:
144:
110:
1127:
listing some of the latest articles from other sites.
1101:
only encourages the outright removal of content when
1522:
Commercialization, dot-com boom and bust, aftermath
839:
Why did you bother rewriting the article at all? —
747:
Why did you put that junk back into the article? —
266:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
84:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
1342:
and no response does not constituent a consensus. ~
825:No strong views on including this. Have removed.
37:by Knowledge editors, which on 27 May 2022 was
876:Talk:History of the Internet#Remove Web stuff
8:
1532:2004–present: The web as platform, ubiquity
1962:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in History
1727:I replaced that pablum with the following-
1502:Summarising the remaining points from the
430:
325:
228:
89:
48:
1518:1994–2004: Open standards, going global
1830:
432:
327:
230:
189:
1102:
605:Portal wars, search wars, browser wars
1860:https://www.wired.com/1994/10/mosaic/
7:
478:This article is within the scope of
373:This article is within the scope of
260:This article is within the scope of
1952:Knowledge vital articles in History
219:It is of interest to the following
961:Talk:World Wide Web#Revamp History
880:Talk:World Wide Web#Revamp History
611:Java, XML and Adobe Flash vs HTML5
608:CGI, SOAP, REST, XmlHttpRequest...
14:
1992:High-importance Internet articles
1977:Mid-importance Computing articles
1967:C-Class vital articles in History
1256:and old versions of this article.
1947:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
1542:Rise of streaming services like
976:left a caution on your talk page
544:
465:
455:
434:
360:
350:
329:
253:
232:
199:
190:
136:
52:
19:
2007:Mid-importance history articles
1595:Why did you list 1994 twice? —
972:edits to World Wide Web#History
518:This article has been rated as
413:This article has been rated as
308:This article has been rated as
288:Knowledge:WikiProject Computing
1957:C-Class level-5 vital articles
1877:. London: Polity Press. p. 2.
1665:This is just badly written. —
1504:Peer review provided by Ruбlov
393:Knowledge:WikiProject Internet
291:Template:WikiProject Computing
70:nominee, but did not meet the
1:
1997:WikiProject Internet articles
1908:This is completely false. —
1356:2 editors is a consensus? —
874:I supported your proposal at
678:19:24, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
663:20:12, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
498:Knowledge:WikiProject History
492:and see a list of open tasks.
396:Template:WikiProject Internet
387:and see a list of open tasks.
282:and see a list of open tasks.
170:History of the World Wide Web
60:History of the World Wide Web
27:History of the World Wide Web
2012:WikiProject History articles
1937:Former good article nominees
1932:Old requests for peer review
1056:drastic removal of content.
978:about removing this content.
640:12:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
501:Template:WikiProject History
1816:11:09, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
1802:06:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
1548:More coverage of web-based
1539:Global expansion of the Web
2028:
1972:C-Class Computing articles
1792:That's a false statement.
1302:00:44, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
1287:15:33, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
1269:21:45, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
1245:14:47, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
1212:21:55, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
1195:00:07, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
1164:21:52, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
1141:17:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
1121:15:13, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
1089:14:47, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
1066:14:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
1042:14:06, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
1007:13:27, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
993:12:42, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
916:12:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
898:12:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
849:10:41, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
835:07:19, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
821:21:26, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
807:20:14, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
793:18:54, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
775:18:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
757:17:40, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
728:17:31, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
714:17:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
696:17:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
524:project's importance scale
419:project's importance scale
314:project's importance scale
78:. Editors may also seek a
1987:C-Class Internet articles
1918:10:55, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
1784:10:46, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
1769:05:15, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
1746:22:14, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
1714:19:04, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
1675:10:50, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
1633:05:15, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
1619:07:02, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
1605:10:58, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
1583:09:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
517:
450:
412:
345:
307:
248:
227:
176:; for its talk page, see
92:
88:
2002:C-Class history articles
1466:10:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
1456:You have no evidence. —
1452:13:49, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
1434:00:43, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
1722:The Web became popular.
1419:15:45, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
1405:17:33, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
1391:17:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
1366:15:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
1352:13:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
1335:00:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
1321:19:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
1079:You're not helping. —
1018:History of the Internet
145:First website ever made
1982:All Computing articles
1942:C-Class vital articles
1871:Couldry, Nick (2012).
924:Knowledge is based on
276:information technology
1558:Effect of widespread
651:user:Brunnock/sandbox
263:WikiProject Computing
206:level-5 vital article
72:good article criteria
1896:Comments by Brunnock
376:WikiProject Internet
164:. Its contents were
160:with a consensus to
118:Good article nominee
481:WikiProject History
1562:usage on Web usage
1075:- zero citations.
970:who reverted your
781:Parallel computing
763:Parallel computing
294:Computing articles
215:content assessment
148:was nominated for
93:Article milestones
1389:
1193:
1119:
1093:The changes that
668:Mostly done now.
602:SHTTP vs HTTPS...
585:
584:
538:
537:
534:
533:
530:
529:
429:
428:
425:
424:
399:Internet articles
324:
323:
320:
319:
184:
183:
131:
130:
127:
126:
47:
46:
2019:
1888:
1887:
1868:
1862:
1857:
1851:
1846:
1840:
1835:
1696:notable websites
1566:Internet culture
1379:
1183:
1109:
1016:article and the
580:
548:
540:
506:
505:
504:history articles
502:
499:
496:
475:
470:
469:
468:
459:
452:
451:
446:
438:
431:
401:
400:
397:
394:
391:
370:
365:
364:
354:
347:
346:
341:
333:
326:
296:
295:
292:
289:
286:
257:
250:
249:
244:
236:
229:
212:
203:
202:
195:
194:
186:
140:
139:
133:
113:
90:
56:
49:
23:
16:
2027:
2026:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2018:
2017:
2016:
1922:
1921:
1898:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1884:
1870:
1869:
1865:
1858:
1854:
1847:
1843:
1836:
1832:
1500:
1175:worked anyway;
779:Just looked at
647:
593:
581:
575:
553:
503:
500:
497:
494:
493:
471:
466:
464:
444:
415:High-importance
398:
395:
392:
389:
388:
368:Internet portal
366:
359:
340:High‑importance
339:
293:
290:
287:
284:
283:
242:
213:on Knowledge's
210:
200:
137:
109:
12:
11:
5:
2025:
2023:
2015:
2014:
2009:
2004:
1999:
1994:
1989:
1984:
1979:
1974:
1969:
1964:
1959:
1954:
1949:
1944:
1939:
1934:
1924:
1923:
1897:
1894:
1890:
1889:
1882:
1863:
1852:
1841:
1829:
1828:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1787:
1786:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1734:
1731:
1728:
1725:
1719:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1691:
1685:
1663:
1658:
1653:
1642:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1563:
1556:
1546:
1540:
1531:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1517:
1515:
1514:
1499:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1340:WP:NODEADLINES
1257:
1250:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1200:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1129:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1014:World Wide Web
981:
980:
979:
965:
954:
943:
932:
919:
918:
904:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
745:
740:
735:
681:
680:
646:
643:
629:
628:
621:Great Firewall
618:
615:
612:
609:
606:
603:
600:
592:
589:
587:
583:
582:
577:
573:
571:
568:
567:
555:
554:
549:
543:
536:
535:
532:
531:
528:
527:
520:Mid-importance
516:
510:
509:
507:
490:the discussion
477:
476:
473:History portal
460:
448:
447:
445:Mid‑importance
439:
427:
426:
423:
422:
411:
405:
404:
402:
385:the discussion
372:
371:
355:
343:
342:
334:
322:
321:
318:
317:
310:Mid-importance
306:
300:
299:
297:
280:the discussion
258:
246:
245:
243:Mid‑importance
237:
225:
224:
218:
196:
182:
181:
158:5 October 2017
156:was closed on
154:The discussion
141:
129:
128:
125:
124:
121:
114:
106:
105:
102:
99:
95:
94:
86:
85:
57:
45:
44:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2024:
2013:
2010:
2008:
2005:
2003:
2000:
1998:
1995:
1993:
1990:
1988:
1985:
1983:
1980:
1978:
1975:
1973:
1970:
1968:
1965:
1963:
1960:
1958:
1955:
1953:
1950:
1948:
1945:
1943:
1940:
1938:
1935:
1933:
1930:
1929:
1927:
1920:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1910:Sean Brunnock
1906:
1905:
1900:
1895:
1885:
1883:9780745639208
1880:
1876:
1875:
1867:
1864:
1861:
1856:
1853:
1850:
1845:
1842:
1839:
1834:
1831:
1827:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1808:Sean Brunnock
1805:
1804:
1803:
1799:
1795:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1785:
1781:
1777:
1776:Sean Brunnock
1773:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1738:Sean Brunnock
1735:
1732:
1729:
1726:
1723:
1720:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1697:
1692:
1690:
1686:
1684:
1681:
1680:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1672:
1668:
1667:Sean Brunnock
1664:
1662:
1659:
1657:
1654:
1652:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1597:Sean Brunnock
1594:
1590:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1580:
1576:
1567:
1564:
1561:
1557:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1545:
1541:
1538:
1537:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1524:
1523:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1507:
1505:
1497:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1458:Sean Brunnock
1455:
1454:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1426:Sean Brunnock
1422:
1421:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1397:Sean Brunnock
1394:
1393:
1392:
1387:
1383:
1378:
1373:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1358:Sean Brunnock
1355:
1354:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1327:Sean Brunnock
1324:
1323:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1309:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1294:Sean Brunnock
1290:
1289:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1261:Sean Brunnock
1258:
1255:
1251:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1204:Sean Brunnock
1201:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1191:
1187:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1156:Sean Brunnock
1153:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1133:Sean Brunnock
1130:
1128:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1117:
1113:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1081:Sean Brunnock
1078:
1074:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1034:Sean Brunnock
1031:
1030:
1028:
1024:
1019:
1015:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1004:
1000:
999:Sean Brunnock
996:
995:
994:
990:
986:
982:
977:
973:
969:
966:
962:
958:
955:
951:
947:
944:
940:
936:
933:
930:
929:
927:
923:
922:
921:
920:
917:
913:
909:
908:Sean Brunnock
905:
902:
901:
900:
899:
895:
891:
886:
881:
877:
850:
846:
842:
841:Sean Brunnock
838:
837:
836:
832:
828:
824:
823:
822:
818:
814:
813:Sean Brunnock
810:
809:
808:
804:
800:
796:
795:
794:
790:
786:
785:Sean Brunnock
782:
778:
777:
776:
772:
768:
764:
760:
759:
758:
754:
750:
749:Sean Brunnock
746:
744:
741:
739:
736:
734:
731:
730:
729:
725:
721:
717:
716:
715:
711:
707:
706:Sean Brunnock
703:
699:
698:
697:
693:
689:
685:
684:
683:
682:
679:
675:
671:
670:Sean Brunnock
667:
666:
665:
664:
660:
656:
655:Sean Brunnock
652:
645:Major rewrite
644:
642:
641:
637:
633:
632:Sean Brunnock
626:
623:of China and
622:
619:
616:
613:
610:
607:
604:
601:
599:Gopher vs Web
598:
597:
596:
590:
588:
570:
569:
566:
565:
561:
557:
556:
552:
547:
542:
541:
525:
521:
515:
512:
511:
508:
491:
487:
483:
482:
474:
463:
461:
458:
454:
453:
449:
443:
440:
437:
433:
420:
416:
410:
407:
406:
403:
386:
382:
378:
377:
369:
363:
358:
356:
353:
349:
348:
344:
338:
335:
332:
328:
315:
311:
305:
302:
301:
298:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
264:
259:
256:
252:
251:
247:
241:
238:
235:
231:
226:
222:
216:
208:
207:
197:
193:
188:
187:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
146:
142:
135:
134:
122:
120:
119:
115:
112:
111:April 3, 2006
108:
107:
103:
100:
97:
96:
91:
87:
83:
82:
77:
73:
69:
68:
67:
66:good articles
61:
58:
55:
51:
50:
42:
41:
36:
33:) received a
32:
31:final version
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1907:
1902:
1901:
1899:
1873:
1866:
1855:
1844:
1833:
1825:
1758:
1721:
1693:
1687:
1682:
1660:
1655:
1650:
1641:
1592:
1588:
1572:
1550:cyberattacks
1530:
1516:
1508:
1501:
1371:
1292:comments. —
1232:verification
1149:User:Whizz40
1125:
1054:
926:WP:Consensus
873:
742:
737:
732:
648:
630:
614:LAMP to MERN
594:
586:
558:
550:
519:
479:
414:
374:
309:
261:
221:WikiProjects
204:
161:
157:
143:
117:
116:
81:reassessment
79:
64:
63:
59:
38:
26:
1498:Peer review
1228:WP:DEMOLISH
950:peer review
939:peer review
174:its history
76:renominated
35:peer review
1926:Categories
1826:References
1679:Reworded:
1560:smartphone
1554:ransomware
1442:applies. ~
617:Mobile web
123:Not listed
1689:Internet.
1593:1994–2004
1589:1991–1994
1173:your ping
968:Volten001
627:companies
591:Additions
285:Computing
272:computing
268:computers
240:Computing
209:is rated
1386:contribs
1308:Brunnock
1275:Brunnock
1224:Brunnock
1190:contribs
1116:contribs
1071:Look at
551:Archives
390:Internet
381:Internet
337:Internet
150:deletion
40:archived
1794:Whizz40
1761:Whizz40
1706:Whizz40
1625:Whizz40
1611:Whizz40
1575:Whizz40
1544:Netflix
1095:Whizz40
1058:Whizz40
1023:Whizz40
985:Whizz40
948:at the
946:Artem.G
937:at the
890:Whizz40
827:Whizz40
799:Whizz40
767:Whizz40
720:Whizz40
702:WP:SIZE
688:Whizz40
522:on the
495:History
486:History
442:History
417:on the
312:on the
211:C-class
101:Process
1440:WP:AGF
1377:Ruбlov
1181:Ruбlov
1107:Ruбlov
1099:WP:USI
1077:WP:USI
935:Ruбlov
274:, and
217:scale.
166:merged
104:Result
62:was a
1509:Lead
1147:Hey,
964:Web."
198:This
168:into
162:merge
1914:talk
1904:1992
1879:ISBN
1812:talk
1798:talk
1780:talk
1765:talk
1742:talk
1710:talk
1671:talk
1629:talk
1615:talk
1601:talk
1579:talk
1552:and
1462:talk
1448:talk
1444:Kvng
1430:talk
1415:talk
1411:Kvng
1401:talk
1382:talk
1362:talk
1348:talk
1344:Kvng
1331:talk
1317:talk
1313:Kvng
1298:talk
1283:talk
1279:Kvng
1265:talk
1241:talk
1237:Kvng
1208:talk
1186:talk
1169:Your
1160:talk
1137:talk
1112:talk
1085:talk
1062:talk
1038:talk
1027:talk
1003:talk
989:talk
974:and
912:talk
894:talk
845:talk
831:talk
817:talk
803:talk
789:talk
771:talk
753:talk
724:talk
710:talk
692:talk
674:talk
659:talk
636:talk
625:BATX
409:High
178:here
98:Date
1591:...
1573:--
1372:six
1254:WWW
983:--
959:at
514:Mid
304:Mid
152:.
1928::
1916:)
1814:)
1800:)
1782:)
1767:)
1744:)
1712:)
1704:--
1673:)
1631:)
1617:)
1603:)
1581:)
1506::
1464:)
1450:)
1432:)
1417:)
1403:)
1384:•
1364:)
1350:)
1333:)
1319:)
1300:)
1285:)
1267:)
1243:)
1210:)
1188:•
1179:.
1162:)
1139:)
1114:•
1087:)
1064:)
1040:)
1029:)
1005:)
991:)
957:Rp
914:)
896:)
847:)
833:)
819:)
805:)
791:)
773:)
755:)
726:)
712:)
694:)
676:)
661:)
638:)
562:,
270:,
1912:(
1886:.
1810:(
1796:(
1778:(
1763:(
1740:(
1708:(
1698:.
1669:(
1627:(
1613:(
1599:(
1577:(
1460:(
1446:(
1428:(
1413:(
1399:(
1388:)
1380:(
1360:(
1346:(
1329:(
1315:(
1311:~
1306:@
1296:(
1281:(
1273:@
1263:(
1239:(
1235:~
1222:@
1206:(
1192:)
1184:(
1158:(
1135:(
1118:)
1110:(
1083:(
1060:(
1036:(
1025:(
1001:(
987:(
910:(
892:(
843:(
829:(
815:(
801:(
787:(
769:(
751:(
722:(
708:(
690:(
672:(
657:(
634:(
564:2
560:1
526:.
421:.
316:.
223::
180:.
29:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
