130:
106:
194:
75:
21:
443:
I know that OV/VM was an "upgrade" of PROFS. The impression I get is that IBM's strategy was confused, and they were pressured to get a cross-platform product by SAA. However someone who knows more about DISOSS needs to chime in here. We used both PROFS and OV/VM, but never DISOSS on out MVS system.
244:
I don't have any "real" IBM OfficeVision screen captures since I never used the program, but I have seen a book that feature the PROFS main menu. Is it OK to recreate a likeness using a word processor, or is that a copyright infringement type of deal? Would IBM get upset at something like:
330:"PROFSPROFS and its e-mail component, known colloquially as PROFS Notes, featured prominently in the investigation of the Iran-Contra scandal. Oliver North believed he had deleted his correspondence, but the system archived it anyway. Congress subsequently examined the e-mail archives."
535:
IBM office systems that may be connected through DISOSS to OfficeVision/MVS series, are OV/VM, OV/400, PS/CICS, PS/TSO, PS/PC, PROFS, and other Mail
Systems Supporting SNADS and DIA. Only a single copy of DISOSS needs to be installed somewhere in the network to accomplish the
493:"A similar fate awaits IBM’s Profs and DisOSS mainframe systems; post-September 1990, Profs will become OfficeVision/VM, and DisOSS OfficeVision/MVS, both similarly equipped with iconic interfaces – it is what is known as conversion by stealth."
458:
Unfortunately, I have no first-hand knowledge or experience of any of these systems. But the article right now implies that OV/MVS is a successor to DISOSS just as OV/VM is a successor to PROFS, whether or not that is true. I believe this book
36:
531:
OPPOSE: Not that familiar with DISOSS. OV/MVS was (is?) similar to OV/VM (PROFS). The impression I get is thst DISOSS is a backend document repository for various disparate systems. Maybe IBM bundled DISOSS and OV/MVS.
512:
needs to
Wikilink to one of them, but at least for now I'm not proposing a merge. My opinion holds for both FAULT and PROFs/OV/DIS - leave separate for now, at least until each is individually improved.
613:
500:
It's saying that PROFS and DISOSS were separate products, but that their destiny was somehow linked. Although neither article has much detail, I see this like the matter of
572:
279:
I think there's more to the menu than what I can see there... there was a photocopy I made of a book about 3270 emulation, but I can't remember where it is right now.
348:
Good catch, Jimj wpg. I suspect PROFSPROFS was a cut and paste error. It does not appear in the cited source, just PROFS. I corrected it in the article. Cheers, --
598:
395:
merge on the grounds that these seems sufficiently distinct to warrant separate discussion; there is certainly no consensus for a merge, and discussion is stale.
178:
608:
184:
488:
First of all, the PROFs name was used by media in 1990, and had nothing to do with DISOSS, a separate product. Second, A May 1989 newsbrief item said:
593:
154:
603:
309:
55:. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see
137:
111:
463:
203:
116:
623:
86:
618:
276:
I got this from a screenshot of the 3270 Workstation
Program from Jim Hoskins IBM Personal System/2: A Business Perspective.
555:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
32:
466:
explains it all, if anyone has access to a copy (I don't.) (Nearest library to me having a copy is 700 km away.)
501:
313:
92:
74:
150:
543:
449:
429:
My understanding is that OfficeVision is more closely related to PROFS. I don't know much about DISOSS.
355:
153:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
48:
434:
338:
333:
I have never seen reference to a PROFSPROFS before, just PROFS. Does this need to be corrected?
460:
400:
539:
518:
445:
351:
52:
505:
587:
471:
430:
419:
334:
283:
231:
508:... both more refs. I'm tempted to work on one or both of them, since a portion of
396:
327:
I noticed a possible vandalism or typo in one of the paragraphs in the article:
514:
193:
129:
105:
368:
146:
547:
522:
475:
453:
438:
423:
414:
I believe that IBM DISOSS is just a former name for IBM OfficeVision/MVS.
404:
360:
342:
317:
286:
234:
467:
415:
142:
305:
297:
301:
509:
227:
68:
15:
192:
60:
56:
27:
296:
The article notes the system started on VM, so was it
384:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
226:
I've worked in places where Office Vision ran under
141:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
614:
Start-Class software articles of
Unknown-importance
183:This article has not yet received a rating on the
533:
573:"5685-106 IBM OfficeVision/MVS (OV/MVS) V1.3"
387:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
8:
230:. Perhaps this article needs an update? --
72:
100:
28:IBM Office and Document Processing System
564:
102:
266:PF6 CONTROL nicknames and distribution
599:Unknown-importance Computing articles
163:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing
7:
609:Unknown-importance software articles
378:The following discussion is closed.
135:This article is within the scope of
254:Press one of the following PF keys.
91:It is of interest to the following
300:? Then on OS/2, a system based on
262:PF4 NOTES, Process notes, messages
14:
551:The discussion above is closed.
256:PF1 CALENDARS Process calendars.
128:
104:
73:
19:
594:Start-Class Computing articles
476:12:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
454:21:09, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
439:07:01, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
424:02:43, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
304:. Then Japanese and Chinese,
166:Template:WikiProject Computing
1:
604:Start-Class software articles
201:This article is supported by
157:and see a list of open tasks.
264:PF5 MAINTAIN all my NOTELOGS
405:21:32, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
292:Character set use not clear
235:22:55, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
640:
185:project's importance scale
361:02:45, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
343:02:10, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
260:PF3 TELEPHONE Directories
200:
182:
123:
99:
59:; for its talk page, see
553:Please do not modify it.
502:Software fault tolerance
381:Please do not modify it.
318:18:16, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
548:20:54, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
523:17:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
287:03:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
240:OfficeVision screenshot
624:All Computing articles
538:
197:
151:information technology
81:This article is rated
619:All Software articles
196:
138:WikiProject Computing
85:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
367:Proposed merge with
204:WikiProject Software
47:. Its contents were
43:with a consensus to
198:
169:Computing articles
87:content assessment
31:was nominated for
258:PF2 OPEN the MAIL
219:
218:
215:
214:
211:
210:
67:
66:
631:
577:
576:
569:
383:
359:
273:
222:OfficeVision/MVS
171:
170:
167:
164:
161:
132:
125:
124:
119:
108:
101:
84:
78:
77:
69:
53:IBM OfficeVision
23:
22:
16:
639:
638:
634:
633:
632:
630:
629:
628:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
571:
570:
566:
557:
556:
506:Fault tolerance
412:
379:
372:
349:
325:
310:143.232.116.173
294:
250:PROFS Main Menu
248:
242:
224:
168:
165:
162:
159:
158:
114:
82:
20:
12:
11:
5:
637:
635:
627:
626:
621:
616:
611:
606:
601:
596:
586:
585:
579:
578:
563:
562:
558:
550:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
481:
480:
479:
478:
441:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
374:
373:
371:
365:
364:
363:
324:
321:
293:
290:
270:
269:
267:
265:
263:
261:
259:
257:
255:
253:
252:
241:
238:
223:
220:
217:
216:
213:
212:
209:
208:
199:
189:
188:
181:
175:
174:
172:
155:the discussion
133:
121:
120:
109:
97:
96:
90:
79:
65:
64:
41:4 October 2017
39:was closed on
37:The discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
636:
625:
622:
620:
617:
615:
612:
610:
607:
605:
602:
600:
597:
595:
592:
591:
589:
574:
568:
565:
561:
554:
549:
545:
541:
537:
524:
520:
516:
511:
507:
503:
499:
492:
491:
490:
489:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
477:
473:
469:
465:
464:9780134478067
462:
457:
456:
455:
451:
447:
442:
440:
436:
432:
428:
427:
426:
425:
421:
417:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
389:
388:
385:
382:
376:
375:
370:
366:
362:
357:
353:
347:
346:
345:
344:
340:
336:
331:
328:
323:"PROFSPROFS"?
322:
320:
319:
315:
311:
308:? Not clear
307:
303:
299:
291:
289:
288:
285:
280:
277:
274:
268:PF7 REMINDERS
251:
246:
239:
237:
236:
233:
229:
221:
206:
205:
195:
191:
190:
186:
180:
177:
176:
173:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
139:
134:
131:
127:
126:
122:
118:
113:
110:
107:
103:
98:
94:
88:
80:
76:
71:
70:
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
42:
38:
34:
30:
29:
25:
18:
17:
567:
559:
552:
534:
413:
392:
386:
380:
377:
332:
329:
326:
295:
281:
278:
275:
249:
247:
243:
225:
202:
136:
93:WikiProjects
44:
40:
26:
540:Peter Flass
536:connection.
446:Peter Flass
352:Mark viking
83:Start-class
57:its history
588:Categories
560:References
369:IBM DISOSS
160:Computing
147:computing
143:computers
112:Computing
431:Jimj wpg
335:Jimj wpg
284:Jimj wpg
232:Commking
117:Software
33:deletion
397:Klbrain
306:UNICODE
271:==: -->
515:Pi314m
298:EBCDIC
149:, and
89:scale.
49:merged
302:ASCII
51:into
45:merge
544:talk
519:talk
504:and
472:talk
461:ISBN
450:talk
435:talk
420:talk
401:talk
356:Talk
354:}} {
350:{{u|
339:talk
314:talk
61:here
510:MVS
468:SJK
416:SJK
393:not
391:To
228:MVS
179:???
35:.
590::
546:)
521:)
474:)
452:)
437:)
422:)
403:)
341:)
316:)
282:--
145:,
115::
575:.
542:(
517:(
470:(
448:(
433:(
418:(
399:(
358:}
337:(
312:(
272:_
207:.
187:.
95::
63:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
