304:, who works for the company that uses the trade name MiWi. I removed the link because it doesn't appear that there can be a MiWi article, yet...there are no links at all on a scholar.google or news.google search that support notability. I've asked him to try to dig up some reliable sources. I'll leave the dead link where you put it for now, but if I don't hear anything positive from Atomsmith for several days, then I'm going to assume there's no MiWi in WP's future and remove the link again. - Dan
80:
53:
375:: "Sometimes it is useful to create a red link to indicate that an article will be created soon or that an article should be created for the topic because it is about a notable and verifiable subject. Red links should not be created for topics that will never have articles...". So, if someone wanders along and removes the link, we'll have to come up with at least a plan for how we're going to justify a
22:
148:
401:
Xbee wireless programmable sensor modules for $ 20+ sound interesting, but for many situations that cost is still too much. Worse, to get started you must purchase at least two modules, the remote and a base unit for your computer. But if 802.15.4 and 802.11 can both use 2.4GHz, than it seems like
477:
I've updated this page to be less out of date but someone undid my edits. Most of this information is either wrong or obsolete. The current revision of the standard is IEEE Std 802.15.4-2020, it contains 10 PHY clauses and has undergone substantial change since 2006 including 21 amendments and 3
184:
This article contains a significant amount of outdated information and has not been updated to reflect the more recent amendments or that 802.15.4-2011 is the "current" standard (e.g. frequencies and data rates allowed for by 802.15.4g and other newer updates). I have added the outdated tag.
478:
revisions. I strongly suggest this page NOT be used for any purpose. Also, "too many primary sources" is not a problem for a page about a standard. ONLY primary sources should be used when describing the standard. I do not understand this policy which places opinions ahead of fact.
366:
so that you two (and others) will see I'm "on your side" in this...I think
Knowledge would be a better place if people relied more on expert Wikipedians (and there are lots) for subjects that require experts, and less on rules. (That doesn't put me in the
331:
are policies. And they apply to articles not links to articles. The absence of a link means a random person can't notice the article doesn't exist to look for themselves if it should exist. This is the same argument for any red link.
548:
402:
common existing computer wireless interfaces should be physically capable of communicating with 802.15.4 remotes. Is this possible? Can any 802.11 hardware inter-communicate with any 802.15.4 sensor?
211:
802.15.4 only defines the MAC and PHY in the Data Link, up to layer 2 not the networking layer i'm currently working to fix that issue, and to add the three revisions to the standard
157:
63:
543:
162:
538:
443:
Should there be an explanation of what LoRa is? It appears to be IEEE 802.15.4g I came to
Knowledge hoping to find a concise, neutral explanation. Example:
533:
138:
128:
371:
camp, because I don't see anything that has a hope of competing with
Knowledge ... but it would be better.) For reference, here's the guideline, from
553:
104:
528:
485:
425:
278:
406:
192:
227:
558:
87:
58:
363:
271:
See on IEEE 802.15.4 specs, page 29: There is only one channel, not three as mentioned in this wiki page. I corrected it.
33:
469:
I'd like to see a section comparing 802.15.4 with
Bluetooth (and any other low-power low-data rate physical fabric)
489:
429:
410:
282:
196:
223:
100:
337:
39:
508:
481:
274:
219:
215:
188:
301:
21:
455:
103:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
372:
349:
300:
To
Cburnett: on the MiWi link, I wasn't clear in my edit summary...that was a conversation with
384:
379:
article. But, I'm in no hurry, and you two seem to like the red link, let's keep it. - Dan
309:
502:
500:
Can you point out your changes in the history? I can't see these changes you talk about.
444:
451:
368:
328:
251:
522:
345:
324:
294:
380:
320:
305:
255:
79:
52:
96:
250:? I don't feel comfortable enough with the topic so far to do this myself.
247:
448:
92:
405:
Are there any cheaper programmable wireless sensors than Zigbee/Xbee? -
513:
493:
459:
433:
414:
388:
353:
313:
286:
258:
231:
200:
344:
Is wikipedia better for having this red link gone? Absolutely not.
147:
376:
362:
I'm going to go turn some of my past arguments with admins into
333:
15:
146:
424:
Is that a typo on line 1? If so, what's it supposed to say?
549:
C-Class
Computer networking articles of Mid-importance
445:
https://www.seeedstudio.com/item_detail.html?p_id=2672
397:
Can 802.15.4 and 802.11 inter-communicate at 2.4GHz?
91:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
473:And efforts to fix it have been undone by someone
336:is a valid link in the context that it is used.
246:Can someone add the alternative UWB PHY added in
8:
544:Mid-importance Computer networking articles
479:
186:
47:
319:Notability is BS (it's a guideline) and
248:http://www.ieee802.org/15/pub/TG4a.html
49:
19:
449:https://www.adafruit.com/products/3072
7:
539:C-Class Computer networking articles
85:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
534:Low-importance Computing articles
554:All Computer networking articles
78:
51:
20:
254:mentions this as well already.
133:This article has been rated as
113:Knowledge:WikiProject Computing
116:Template:WikiProject Computing
1:
514:10:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
494:00:14, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
287:10:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
259:09:30, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
201:13:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
155:This article is supported by
107:and see a list of open tasks.
575:
529:C-Class Computing articles
232:19:45, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
139:project's importance scale
415:12:58, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
389:02:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
354:06:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
314:06:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
264:There is only one channel
154:
132:
73:
46:
460:12:29, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
434:23:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
559:All Computing articles
151:
101:information technology
28:This article is rated
158:Networking task force
150:
88:WikiProject Computing
465:Compare and contrast
180:Outdated Information
242:alternative UWB PHY
338:User:81.240.250.87
152:
119:Computing articles
34:content assessment
496:
484:comment added by
289:
277:comment added by
235:
218:comment added by
203:
191:comment added by
177:
176:
173:
172:
169:
168:
566:
512:
511:
272:
234:
212:
207:Networking layer
121:
120:
117:
114:
111:
82:
75:
74:
69:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
574:
573:
569:
568:
567:
565:
564:
563:
519:
518:
507:
501:
475:
467:
441:
422:
420:Typo on line 1?
399:
298:
266:
244:
213:
209:
182:
118:
115:
112:
109:
108:
67:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
572:
570:
562:
561:
556:
551:
546:
541:
536:
531:
521:
520:
517:
516:
474:
471:
466:
463:
440:
437:
421:
418:
398:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
357:
356:
341:
340:
302:User:Atomsmith
297:
291:
265:
262:
243:
240:
238:
208:
205:
181:
178:
175:
174:
171:
170:
167:
166:
163:Mid-importance
153:
143:
142:
135:Low-importance
131:
125:
124:
122:
105:the discussion
83:
71:
70:
68:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
571:
560:
557:
555:
552:
550:
547:
545:
542:
540:
537:
535:
532:
530:
527:
526:
524:
515:
510:
506:
505:
499:
498:
497:
495:
491:
487:
486:47.143.92.123
483:
472:
470:
464:
462:
461:
457:
453:
450:
446:
438:
436:
435:
431:
427:
426:92.235.14.191
419:
417:
416:
412:
408:
403:
396:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
365:
361:
360:
359:
358:
355:
351:
347:
343:
342:
339:
335:
330:
326:
322:
318:
317:
316:
315:
311:
307:
303:
296:
295:IEEE 802.15.4
292:
290:
288:
284:
280:
279:81.240.250.87
276:
270:
263:
261:
260:
257:
253:
249:
241:
239:
236:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
206:
204:
202:
198:
194:
190:
179:
164:
161:(assessed as
160:
159:
149:
145:
144:
140:
136:
130:
127:
126:
123:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
503:
480:— Preceding
476:
468:
442:
423:
407:96.237.12.99
404:
400:
299:
268:
267:
245:
237:
210:
193:82.1.136.125
187:— Preceding
183:
156:
134:
86:
40:WikiProjects
373:WP:Red link
273:—Preceding
214:—Preceding
523:Categories
220:Martinvilu
64:Networking
452:Rcrowley7
447:Example:
110:Computing
97:computing
93:computers
59:Computing
482:unsigned
346:Cburnett
327:, &
293:MiWi at
275:unsigned
228:contribs
216:unsigned
189:unsigned
504:Stepho
369:WP:FAIL
329:WP:NPOV
137:on the
30:C-class
381:Dank55
364:essays
325:WP:NOR
306:Dank55
269:Error:
256:Noleti
99:, and
36:scale.
439:LoRa?
509:talk
490:talk
456:talk
430:talk
411:talk
385:talk
377:MiWi
350:talk
334:MiWi
321:WP:V
310:talk
283:talk
224:talk
197:talk
252:UWB
129:Low
525::
492:)
458:)
432:)
413:)
387:)
352:)
323:,
312:)
285:)
230:)
226:•
199:)
165:).
95:,
62::
488:(
454:(
428:(
409:(
383:(
348:(
308:(
281:(
222:(
195:(
141:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
