Talk:International E-road network

524:) 04:41, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) The truth is, that the overall signage in Germany is poor. Among German motorists, there is virtually any kind of awareness about E-roads, they simply follow the German national numbering schemes. E-road numbers are only included in the motorway reassurance signs. The few E-road sections on Bundesstraßen (Federal highways apart from motorways) often provide a better E-road signage than on the motorway system. Example: E233 near the Dutch border. However, at least some major interchanges in Niedersachsen (Lower Saxony), Saarland and Berlin do cover E numbering. But these rare examples are not specifically on newer signs - especially in Berlin these signs are often very old. Ironically, the E signage in the former GDR was far better than in West Germany. After the 1990 reunification, this has been changed to West German standard, because the GDR motorway system was included into the German motorway numbering system. 1913:

Bruxelles (Brussels), Liège, enters Germany near Aachen and continues to Köln (Cologne), crosses the Rhine, turns southwards to pass between Wiesbaden and Frankfurt, crosses the Main, turns eastwards again to pass south of Frankfurt, continues in a southeasterly direction past Würzburg, Nürnberg, and Regensburg, crosses the Danube into Austria and proceeds via Linz to Vienna, then into Hungary and on to Budapest, from there to Szeged and (the then still-existing Yugoslavia, now Serbia). From there to Beograd (Belgrade) and Niš (Nish), where the E5 splits into the 5S, which runs south to Thessaloniki in Greece, then east to Turkey, while the 5N continues to Bulgaria and the cities of Sofija and Plovdiv, then on to Edirne in Tutkey. The 5S and 5N rejoin just to the west of Istanboul. The map shows the E5 crossing into Anatolia but there are no further maps of Turkey in Asia. i hope this hasn't been too wordy. (dsh/2015.01.16)--

2094:

for sign posts in Montenegro, I started thinking about them, and could not remember I have ever seen sign with road E-numbers, but I wasn't sure if it is because they don't exist, or I selectively don't remember because I don't really need them locally. But you are right, even the newer ones don't appear to have any numbers. And as for local numbers, I found out that last year Government recategorised roads to reflect actual situation, which means a whole bunch of Wiki articles are now wrong, and should be rewritten and/or deleted. Not sure how to proceed with that too. Here is a

156: 215: 205: 184: 1567: 1321: 1301: 1605: 310:

to a specific place. However, you'd have to know where "Bruxelles" is in reference to where you want to be. Having done long drives in N. America and Europe, I think the European system has the clear advantage of providing known waypoints for navigtion. A route such as Bruxelles-Köln-Frankfurt-Nürmberg-Passau-Linz-Wien is much easier to visualise and follow than E40 east to E314 east to German A4 south to German A5 south, etc. --

90: 1597: 1894: 1905: 1577: 1572: 22: 2064:

Directorate for transport has on their website map of roads that is outdated by at least 15 years. But I will look into it. Problem with the ECE/TRANS/SC.1/384 is that it was published in 2008, and that makes it also outdated. Only other source I looked at is google maps, which I don't think can be looked as official, and is conflicting with ECE/TRANS/SC.1/384.

651:

between international and national highway systems (heck, they are both highway systems). But then, if we are to compare international and national highway systems, why should we compare it against just the US one? The US is but one country of many, a particularly important one in many fields, but in the field of highway systems? I doubt so. -- Samuel Katinsky

1327: 928:

tag on the by pass routes rather than through the city centre which reduces the journey time (presumably...) but also increases the journey length quite significantly. ....to the extent that if I were simply measuring distances from urban centre to urban centre, I'd most likely end up pretty close to the 1290 km length from the Italian wiki entry on E62.

80: 53: 858:(any other reliable sources?) the naming is always with a space between letter and number - any reason why we don't have this space here? It's not regulated in the source to have a space (or dashes etc.) on the sign, so it may often be omitted resulting in smaller and cheaper signs - but I don't see a reason to omit the spaces here. Greetings -- 2036:

We should describe E80/E65 as it really is, based on sources, and that is the Wiki rules. First UNECE describe them as going Dubrovnik–Petrovac–Podgorica. Then, the government of Montenegro decides the exact alignment. We only describe them as Dubrovnik–Petrovac–Podgorica which is true even if it use

1111:

2. (...) Les routes de catégorie B reçoivent des numéros à trois chiffres dont le premier est celui de la route repère la plus proche située au nord de la route B considérée et le deuxième celui de la route repère la plus proche située à l’ouest de la route B considérée, le troisième chiffre étant un

1012:

I am not certain of this, but I think that the E02 described here is an international long distance walking path, not a road route. I have a German road atlas which shows E routes in ins summary of Europe. It shows E01, E16, E18, E20, E30, E201 in Ireland, but nothing going to Galway and no E02. If I

650:

I removed the reference to the US Highway/Interstate system, since I don't see any connection that has to E-roads. E-roads are an international, transcontinental system; thus, they are most similar to the Pan-American Highway or to the Asian Highway Network. There is of course some vague similarities

588:

Yes, the UK does get funding for them from the EU. The EU has grandiose plans for networking the whole of Europe, and is putting lots of money into it (more into those nations with fewer roads than us). You sometimes see the EU logo on signs advertising new road projects, but they take the signs down

309:

This is true, European roads are not usually referred to as going "north" or "south", but rather to "Paris" or "Bruxelles". Both systems have their advantages: while a road designated "north" would make it easier to head in that general direction, a road labelled "Bruxelles" would be sure to take you

2190:

Can the history table be made collapsible, please, and collapsed by default? It seems wrong to have huge tracts of the page, near the top, spent on something that is historically interesting but was true yonks ago. It should still be there, but optional to open and read, I feel. I'd do it myself but

600:

Article 1. The Contracting Parties adopt the proposed road network herein after referred to as "the international E-road network" and described in annex I to this Agreement as a co-ordinated plan for the construction and development of roads of international importance which they intend to undertake

2093:

Don't get me wrong, I agree with you, E65/E80 should go to Sutomore, but it kind of isn't in line with "... branch, link and connecting roads, called class-B roads..." from UNECE document, as E851 is B-road, and as such should not overlap with A-roads. But unless someone disagrees, I'm with you. As

887:

The signs in the article do not show a space, nor does the navbox at the bottom, nor are the individual road articles named so. I wanted to add anchors to the article for roads that don't have their own article (to facilitate easy location/wikilinking from other articles), but don't know whether to

811:

Dundalk-Newry dual carriageway, which opened today, does not have similar signs (and in fact, this would be the one strech of road you would expect them to use the E number!). Secondly, the E-01 markers are not in the standard format and are rather small (I believe they should read "E1" now, rather

681:

I would suggest that a high resolution map of the complete E-road Network be placed in this article. It should include all A class roads at least, and even B class if the scale permits. It should include information about which parts of a route are up to motorway standards, which are not, which are

324:

200km), but personal experiences are not important for encyclopedia article. The design of the system suggests that the authors had compass directions in mind. And I would like the article say if that's true (and then why it was not implemented), or not (and then why is it organized by N-S, E-W). --

304:

Is there any reason why the numbers are not accompanied by a compass direction (North, West, ..), the same way as in U.S.? I saw few times in Scandinavia, but not in the rest of Europe. It makes orientation much much easier, especially at complex junctions. Is it just a problem of choosing a common

2078:

I think it enough to 1. follow the UNECE list and 2.use available road maps as reference. I have looked for road signs in Google Streetview, but it appears that national or European road number signs don't exist exist in Montenegro. So it is hard to know any info. Viamichelin.com has E65/E80 along

927:

Distances change over time. Little by little, bits of this road get converted or supplemented into / by autoroute. Even where that does not happen, by pass roads that avoid the town centre have been a priority with French road builders in the last decade or so. Maps and software put the E 62

1084:

I'm curious as to why these have gone, since according to the UNECE standard, and seemingly most of the signage in those places that do it, the prefixes should be there. Exceptions for E4 and E6 are justified, since strictly speaking those two are from the former system (based on traffic volumes

654:

I suppose the edits mentioned by Samuel Katinsky have been undone. My reason for commenting at all is that the article does not make it clear how the E-road network was originally envisaged as comparable to the US Interstate System given that the article on that system states its construction was

323:

I actually have just the opposite experience (easy to drive in U.S. following compass directions, hard in Europe, especially on complex junctions, and in places where all town names seem the same to me; also which name should I look for on round-about signs - the town 10km from here, 50km, 100km,

1912:

According to an old road atlas I have (published by Rand McNally in 1976, before the present numbering system was devised), the original E5 begins in London, via Dover crosses the Channel to Calais, turns eastwards along the Belgian coast to Oostende, then inland to Gent (so-spelled), onwards to

951:

I too have had a difference of opinion regarding distances - inb particular regarding the E13: Doncaster - London route. Initially I used viaMichelin and specified just Doncaster and London. I am now having second thoughts - I have looked at the specification of a E-route and now I believe that

1408:

renders them with the leading zeros (if your screen is large enough, you should see all of E03, E05, E07 and E09). Somewhere, I have printed maps that use the leading zero exclusively. Also, bear in mind that with the expansion of the network eastwards, there are now single-digit roads with

932:

I guess this raises quite complex interlocking questions about the 'wiki-nature' of 'wiki-truth' as it impacts route distances. I wonder if anyone else has been through these thought processes and formed any conclusions - consensus even? The wiki project highways group seems to be chiefly

2063:

Well, the problem is, I changed those articles, before asking the question here, and was planning and reverting depending on consensus made here. I can access all Montenegrin laws, but to be honest, I sincerely doubt that I will find anything in regard to this. For example, our (Montenegrin)

834:

E-201 has now been signposted. The E-201 is the N8. It is signed on Route Confirmation Signs South of Cashel, and they are bigger than what was put on the Gorey Bypass. I think the article should be changed to reflect this, also to keep a refernce to the new TSM, if it ever comes out.

1271:

I'm unsure of the history of E8/E08. The route in Norway and Sweden is north of E10, however the route in Finland is decidedly north-south. Whether or not this is included in the request depends on whether or not it was defined entirely in 1992 or has sections dating back to the 1975

346:

Would be good info for the article, but as with everything in Knowledge (XXG) it should be referenced. Maybe just my imagination but I find that "roadgeek"-oriented articles often tend to rely on personal observation. But by no means are all of them underreferenced! - Regards,

404:

How should one treat the cases of E47 (which is within Scandinavia, at least Sweden and Norway, called and signed E6) and E55 (which is within Scandinavia, at least Sweden, called and signed E4)? As of now, they are listed here as E04 and E06, which is not a good solution. Also,

579:

Are the roads just lines on a map, or something more? Do national governments get funding for them from the EU or the UN? What effect do they have on me in the UK, where we don't even seem to sign any of them? The article doesn't mention any of these kind of questions.

987:

The entry clearly needs a map, but if you can substitute a more up to date map, please do it. Otherwise there must be a way, using GIMP or some similar program, to superimpose the network shown here on a map that incorporates current (or at least more recent) national

910:

But now I am trying to compute the distance leg by leg using both (1) distances on road atlases (Ravenstein. Michelin, TCI) and (2) Microsoft Autoroute 2006 'route finder' software (applying cumulative minus previous cumulative to avoid excessive impact from roundings).

933:

interested in stateside routes which is fine and dandy, but in Europe the distances issue seems to be rather different in a way that folks who seldom travel outside The Union probably would mostly find pretty hard to conceptualise. Maybe that should be conceptualize.

550:

The official name of the system is the "international E-road network", which is why I moved the article here. "European route" does not seem to be in common use. That of course brings us to the question of what to title the articles about the roads. Maybe

952:

maybe I should repeat the exercise, but only include the sections of the road that permit motor vehicles - in this case start at J3 of the M18 rather than the Doncaster City Centre and end at Junction 1 of the M1 (rather than the London City centre).

795:

3. (I lied about the number). Irish people tend not to like the term "British Isles", mostly because of the way it encourages people to assume it refers to a single country with uniform characteristics (as appears to have happened in the old text).

608:

Article 2. The international E-road network consists of a grid system of reference roads having a general north-south and west-east orientation; it includes also intermediate roads located between the reference roads and branch, link and connecting

2079:

the curvy hilly road and E581 from Petrovac, while Google Maps and Bing maps in the tunnel. E581 should be written to begin from Petrovac, because UNECE writes that in their definition. For E65/E80 whichever, beacuse UNECE does not define that.--

2225:

I'm experiencing problems as well, on a fairly modern computer. It seems it's downloading resources but since there's no feedback, there's no way to tell. When the map finally shows up it's just a generic map, not for example a E-road network

2155:

change, as it is UNECE rather than EU, though to be fair I have no idea how the funding and influence works, who is doing who a favour, etc. Who or what "makes" the UK comply and why do we want to? I dunno, please educate me, encyclopaedists!

1304:), even though the number is not taken from the older system. This is a principle used in Finland and Norway, which comes from the E4 and E6. The north-south direction comes from an extension in year 2002. What to call it I am not sure of. -- 289:

It is untrue that Belgian E-roads do not have a national designation. They do, but virtually no one uses it. Thus, while the E411 is also the A4 in Belgium, virtually everyone calls it the E411. I have changed the article to reflect this.

2256:

But I think the text is unclear, because at the end, it says Russia uses these signs, although earlier it was mentioned, that at the Asian parts of Russia this numbering standard is not used. (And usually the acting statement is the

2009:(over the mountain route), which is 100% in line with ECE/TRANS/SC.1/384. I am not that good with wiki rules, so I hope more experienced users would help with this. Note: I understand that E65/E80 does not specify the route between 1085:

rather than on a grid - I have a book somewhere which lists at least E1-E25 from that scheme), with grid positions E04 and E06 not used, but the others should certainly be zero-prefixed - even the new signage in Ireland uses them.

1983:. Using google maps, I can see that the distance is actually exactly the same, but living here, I can tell you that this is main route with most traffic, and other is only alternative, and not maintained as good as before. 991:

There might even be a need to update the image of network itself: I don't know enough about recent developments with the E roads to judge that. Unfortunately I'm not fluent in GIMP. But ... someone must be. Regards

2167:

every time I point the car at Northumberland or wherevs. So in a slightly confused and elderly way I find myself wondering if that will change; I don't think it will; it would be great if the article covered this point.

1431:

but I would prefer actual photographic evidence to Knowledge (XXG) generated graphics. I have photos and maps to the contrary but have not visited the routes in question or bought relevant maps recently. —

906:

I have been translating an entry on the E62 from Italian. Our Italian friends have a total distance for the E 62 of 1290 km from somewhere (source not to me obvious) so I copied it to the intro para.

888:

include a space or not. It would also be nice to have (perhaps hidden) text with the road number at each entry to allow searching for it in the browser (i.e. the signs are nice, but aren't searchable).

682:

planned to be upgraded to motorway etc... Also, even though there are images of some of the roads on articles about the country they belong to, it could be useful to link them here, or even add more.

691:

Also, there is something wrong with the map of the German system. It's fine if one follows the link, but in the article on my browser, it appears as a thick vertical gray line on a white background.

1358:. Define "no else uses the terms formatted as such". They are certainly signposted with leading zeroes. We've got photos on Commons of signs in Ireland, France, Spain and Portugal showing them. 2128:

over the next two decades and more. dewiki mentions that the renumbering happened around 1985. So was it 1985 or 1992? Or did it perhaps change gradually country by country over many years?

745:

What is the reason for inclusion of two images of Georgia's network where many countries aren't even displayed? The fist image displaying Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia seems adequate.

1528:

is definitely signed as E01 (on a green background even on motorway sections). I'll search my files for a photo; until recently E-routes were not signposted in Ireland; but the road from

623:

Article 3. The roads of the international E-road network as referred to in article 1 of this Agreement shall be brought into conformity with the provisions of annex II to this Agreement.

437:] define these two roads as full E-roads, not as any special numbering of any other E-road. They are violating the east-west principle, but nevertheless they are called E04 and E06. 2298: 972:

I suggest removing this map from the article, since it is 20 years incorrect. it is showing the borders of the USSR, Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia, instead of independent states.

435:

There is an edit war between me and a not logged-in person (latest IP 81.104.170.167) regarding this issue. The reason for having articles E4 ad E6 is that the official document

715:

Correct. It's a 1990-1991 map (Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, USSR still exist; Germany reunited). Someone with more Photoshop ability than I shoudl update it or create a new one.

1832:

isn't a dab page or a redirect to the Vatican or something -- it's an article on the Italian capital). But the omission is so unmistakable that I figured I'd suppress my

872:

I agree on that, it would make sense to have consistent information sources. According to the official UNECE document I will start to adjust the naming of the E-roads. --

1629:

Anyway, I had to search the crypt for this. It is on the N11 route in County Wexford; E-01. (Wexford County Council adopts a zero-tolerance approach to poor eyesight).

454:

Thank you for that source, I now stand corrected, and of course I will gladly assist your efforts to keep the article correct, if this edit war will keep going on. --

655:

only authorized in 1956, which is after the date this article states the Declaration on the Construction of Main International Traffic Arteries was signed, in 1950.

424:

Like you, I too was dumbfounded when noticing this fact, as I'm used to travelling the E6 from north to south and vice versa... Likewise the E4 up and down Sweden. --

412:

I see that I missed on signing the message. But it was mine! =) The reason for listing the roads as E04 and E06 being a bad idea is of course that they are anything

2313: 2293: 2235:

The introductory text says at first, that Russia does not use E-road designations, then at the end, to the contrary, it states that Russia uses these designations.

1380:. Please post or link to photos showing usage or cite maps or atlases. All commons photos seem to lack the leading zeroes unless I'm looking in the wrong place. 1054:

is the original list by the decisive authority, and it does not contain any E02. Unless it has appeared just recently. But I don't beleive that. The content in

789:

1. The reference to roads not crossing borders with differing numbers on either side is false. Two states and a land border means that that does indeed happen.

2098:

to bylaw in official gazette of Montenegro. Good thing is, in researching this, I found out that there was official update to the ECE/TRANS/SC.1/384 document.

1971:

there is much, much safer route. In time of the document, you would go over the mountain, but today, you can go a bit more down the coastline to the south to

637:

Article 4. 1. The roads of the international E-road network shall be identified and signed by means of the road sign described in annex III to this Agreement.

1114:

4. Les routes d’embranchement, de rocade ou de liaison situées à l’est de la E 101 ont des numéros à trois chiffres commençant par 0 et allant de 001 à 099.

146: 267: 2288: 2196: 2176: 136: 2328: 2308: 257: 165: 63: 2303: 2021:, and there should not be overlapping of the routes, means that the mountain route is considered by the ECE/TRANS/SC.1/384 official E65/E80 route. 1268:

E4 and E6 are throwbacks to the 1975 system, which did not use leading zeroes. Therefore, dropping the zero is probably justified for these two.

2318: 371:

A pity that the powers that be haven't included Iceland in the uber Autobahn system, even though Anatolia, Kazakhstan and Syria get a look in.

112: 2210:

The map (what is in th infobox) load for 5 minutes, then shows nothing. I reloaded it, but it almost freezed my computer. Please fix that.--

2333: 2192: 2172: 1481: 1359: 1086: 807:

I get the slight feeling that Wexford County Council did a solo run on putting "E-01" on route confirmation signs on the Gorey Bypass. The

752: 531: 2049:, you should ask the government of Montenegro, which the requests it to UNECE, that is the process. Knowledge (XXG) can't change things.-- 1920: 1787: 1654: 1448: 1414: 1277: 1213: 859: 2283: 1122:

For the prefix with only one leading zero, did it exist at least one day? According to the news from 1935, the first English European

662: 1294:. They are called E03 and E05 etc in the official documents. And they are signposted E03, E05, E09 along the roads. I know that the 103: 58: 2095: 473:

I would like to propose a 'standard' for listing the roads, based on the current de facto scheme. It should be noted in the text.

2323: 2159:

I do realize that this is hardly a topic of a setting-the-Thames-on-fire level of urgency. I don't think we can see them signed

2045:

write that they pass Sutomore and therefore the tunnel, so there is nothing to change. If you wish a change of the alignment of

1763:). The UK does not sign them at all, so the only remaining country is Portugal. Any Portuguese road sign photographers around? — 1405: 228: 189: 33: 2215: 1566: 1208:-numbered roads. The UNECE source document unequivocally uses the leading zeroes on these roads. I have not proposed the 903:

Does anyone know of any wiki-preferred provenance for E road distances appearing in wiki entries on E roads? Background:

1059: 1813:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

1155:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

1740:

We have Spain which uses one digit and Ireland which has the leading zero. Do we have examples from other countries? —

1401: 924:

It runs through three different countries, each of which may apply different base assumptions concerning distances.

1550:

Please, if you find any photographic or similar evidence, post it. Commons only has pictures without the "0". —

1773: 1126:/motorway was from Istambul to Londres, via Cologne, and the european road number 1 did not had any leading zero 2151:

upon E-roads in the UK. I have not read round it extensively but it is sounding to me a bit as if there will be

1749: 1195: 1485: 1413:

leading zeroes. It would seem that some of the Spanish regions have opted to sign their routes inaccurately.

1363: 1343:. For Knowledge (XXG) naming conventions, the UNECE is irrelevant if no else uses the terms formatted as such. 1090: 535: 756: 305:

language? Or it was it never intended that way, but why then is the numbering organized by compass direction?

39: 1924: 863: 1791: 1658: 1452: 1418: 1281: 1217: 840: 666: 2147:

I would love it if a knowledgeable person could update the article to explain the post-Brexit consequences

1916: 1783: 1340: 921:

For much of its length A 62 runs NOT on autoroutes - for which well established verifyable distances exist.

748: 658: 527: 1760: 1397: 2211: 2124:

The article mentions that roads were renumbered in 1992. AFAICT the new numbers were agreed in 1975 and

2018: 2010: 1964: 1956: 1948: 1890:

I want to know about "where the former European route E5 begins and where it passes before reaching the

914:

I've not finished, but I think I am finding the measured distances longer than the 1290 km by maybe 5%.

855: 311: 291: 111:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2103: 2069: 2026: 1104:

For the prefix with two leading zeros, I assume the reason why there is a 00 prefix is the following:

1576: 799: 155: 21: 2046: 1702: 1571: 1552: 1496: 1463: 1434: 1384: 1349: 997: 941: 771:

The list should be updated with the recent changes documented in the minutes for the 2004 meeting:

716: 1833: 1320: 1300: 873: 556: 2264: 2243: 2125: 2042: 2038: 1856: 1726: 1680: 1634: 1620: 1541: 1525: 1258: 1249: 1240: 1231: 1183: 1055: 1051: 1041: 1022: 1014: 957: 836: 560: 552: 493: 2133: 1841: 1295: 1254: 1245: 1236: 1227: 1179: 1169: 977: 877: 819: 406: 387: 352: 1650: 772: 581: 329: 204: 183: 1604: 1428: 2268: 2247: 2219: 2200: 2180: 2137: 2107: 2099: 2088: 2073: 2065: 2058: 2030: 2022: 1928: 1860: 1845: 1795: 1777: 1753: 1745: 1730: 1710: 1684: 1672: 1662: 1638: 1624: 1560: 1545: 1504: 1489: 1471: 1456: 1442: 1422: 1392: 1367: 1353: 1313: 1285: 1221: 1199: 1191: 1173: 1127: 1094: 1071: 1045: 1026: 1001: 981: 961: 945: 892: 881: 867: 844: 822: 802: 760: 739: 705: 702: 695: 692: 686: 670: 593: 539: 458: 441: 391: 356: 333: 314: 294: 1804: 1146: 815:

Until they publish the very long awaited new TSM, we won't know for sure, of course....

1939:

OK, so, in ECE/TRANS/SC.1/384, E65/E80 portion of the road trough Montenegro goes from

1884: 1345: 993: 937: 786:

I'm about to edit the reference to signage practice in the British Isles. Two reasons:

568: 521: 505:

It would be nice to have information about signage in each country. Here's all I know:

1828:

isn't wikilinked in those long lists of cities? I can't imagine why not (given that

2277: 2260: 2239: 2084: 2054: 2002: 1994: 1986: 1976: 1852: 1769: 1722: 1697: 1676: 1630: 1616: 1537: 1309: 1067: 1037: 1018: 953: 775: 382:

Presumably in much the same way as they've done for Britain and Ireland. - Regards,

220: 1596: 2163:

in the UK and I'm only aware of it because my Tomtom GPS software announces the A1

2129: 1837: 1786:

would be that the burden is on the unofficial form to demonstrate widespread use.

1165: 973: 683: 485: 425: 383: 348: 95: 701:

No, cut that. It works fine now that I changed the thumb size to 275px. How odd.

1880: 325: 1119:

This means the issue comes from road E101 and greater which have three digits.

1741: 1187: 590: 210: 85: 1997:

article, it says it is part of E65 route. So my question is, should we go by

2014: 1980: 1968: 1952: 1940: 792:

2. E-road signage has begun to sneak onto signs in the Republic of Ireland.

564: 517: 512:

Germany - signed on newer signs and at major junctions and reassurance signs

1963:. My problem is, that this is somewhat old document, and since then, from 1326: 2080: 2050: 1998: 1990: 1972: 1898: 1872: 1765: 1533: 1305: 1063: 616:

CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ROADS OF THE INTERNATIONAL E-ROAD NETWORK

589:

when the roads are finished. I'll see if I can dig up some references. --

455: 438: 417: 2006: 1985:

Speaking of google maps, it is in line with what I said, and considers

1960: 1944: 1529: 828: 808: 375:

How are you supposed to do that, given its isolation from the mainland?

108: 1461:

Does that mean you have no other evidence to support your request? —

1318:

Actually, in Spain they seem to be sign posted without zeroes. Photos

1276:

Throw in the lack of an E02, and there's no even numbers to move yet.

1904: 1876: 233: 492:

Might it not be helpful to note the design and such of the roads? --

79: 52: 1867:

In the 1970s, where the European route E5 begins and where it ends?

711:

The map is missing national boundaries of post-Soviet Union states

477:

a hyphen '-' between towns; several hyphens where towns are omitted

1879:, and it states that "the European route E5 in Turkey starts from 1603: 1494:

I don't but I'm not proposing an article move. See also below. —

1782:

The official designation has a leading zero. The implication of

1186:— Extending this discussion because of new evidence turning up. — 1829: 1825: 1615:

Wow! 3-1 in favour and closed as "no consensus" after 20 hours!

1052:

http://www.unece.org/trans/doc/2008/sc1/ECE-TRANS-SC1-384e.pdf

15: 1447:

If you want photos from Ireland, feel free to go take them.

1033: 154: 484:

No revolution, just putting the de facto std in writing. --

232:, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to 1036:

appears to be a useful resource, it doesn't list E02. --

630:

SIGNING OF THE ROADS OF THE INTERNATIONAL E-ROAD NETWORK

1145:

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a

1128:

https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k47649363/f3.item

1803:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

1536:

is called the E01, not E1, wherever a sign appears.

107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 236:

topics of a cross-border nature on Knowledge (XXG).

1721:My pleasure - I'll try to be quicker next time :) 601:within the framework of their national programmes. 1404:is definitely how the Irish have rendered it. 1204:I propose that the zeroes be reinstated on the 1109: 1058:was added by one user only, and the content in 646:Removal of reference to US highways/interstates 635: 628: 621: 614: 606: 598: 1476:Do you have any evidence to the contrary from 2299:Top-importance Europe road transport articles 480:an ellipsis '...' denoting connections by sea 8: 1582:I note that all of these examples are from 1914: 1759:Also France with leading zero, see above ( 656: 178: 47: 1989:route as E65/E80, and E851 now starts at 1595: 1264:The even numbers aren't listed because: 1212:-numbered roads for historical reasons. 2191:would probably break the table! Thanks 180: 49: 19: 2314:Top-importance Road transport articles 2294:C-Class Europe road transport articles 2005:route), which I believe is better, or 1427:Call me old-fashioned and I certainly 1909:Turkish border? (until the mid-90s). 1298:is signposted E8 (like in this photo 1017:article is also completely wrong. -- 7: 285:Unique use of E-road name in Belgium 226:This article is within the scope of 121:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Highways 101:This article is within the scope of 2017:, but the fact that E851 starts at 1649:In light of this new evidence, I'm 1160:The result of the move request was 409:has its own page, under that name. 38:It is of interest to the following 1935:E65/E80 and E851 trough Montenegro 242:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Europe 14: 2186:History table - make collapsible? 163:This article is supported by the 2289:Top-importance Highways articles 1903: 1892: 1575: 1570: 1565: 1325: 1319: 1299: 213: 203: 182: 88: 78: 51: 20: 2329:High-importance Europe articles 2309:C-Class Road transport articles 2171:Thanks and best wishes to all, 262:This article has been rated as 141:This article has been rated as 2304:Europe road transport articles 2138:06:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 1955:and so on, and E851 starts at 893:05:12, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 1: 2319:WikiProject Highways articles 2201:08:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 2181:08:11, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 2143:E-roads in the UK post-Brexit 2037:the tunnel. In fact articles 1861:08:35, 30 December 2009 (UTC) 1846:08:12, 30 December 2009 (UTC) 1608:Humongously magnified version 1072:14:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 1046:23:36, 11 February 2009 (UTC) 1027:23:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC) 845:14:11, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 778:08:39, August 14, 2005 (UTC) 671:03:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC) 392:08:04, 30 December 2009 (UTC) 357:08:05, 30 December 2009 (UTC) 334:04:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC) 124:Template:WikiProject Highways 115:and see a list of open tasks. 1929:23:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 1400:is an example from France. 1060:International E-road network 882:18:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC) 740:22:05, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 687:12:59, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 594:20:11, 26 January 2006 (UTC) 584:12:23, August 8, 2005 (UTC) 459:21:10, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 442:20:46, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 166:European Highways Task Force 2334:WikiProject Europe articles 1174:09:54, 15 August 2009 (UTC) 1002:16:21, 31 August 2008 (UTC) 982:07:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC) 571:) 05:38, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) 245:Template:WikiProject Europe 2350: 2120:1975/1985/1992 renumbering 1836:and ask first. - Regards, 1796:22:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 1778:18:27, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 1754:17:36, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 1731:23:13, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 1711:23:03, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 1685:13:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 1663:13:39, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 1639:08:24, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 1625:08:09, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 1561:19:58, 2 August 2009 (UTC) 1546:11:21, 2 August 2009 (UTC) 1505:19:58, 2 August 2009 (UTC) 1490:17:23, 1 August 2009 (UTC) 1200:17:36, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 1034:http://roads.goodnight.to/ 962:09:27, 11 April 2013 (UTC) 823:20:07, 2 August 2007 (UTC) 761:10:59, 9 August 2010 (UTC) 706:01:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 696:01:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 540:08:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC) 315:11:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 300:Why not compass directions 295:11:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 268:project's importance scale 147:project's importance scale 2284:C-Class Highways articles 1586:, which is the exception. 1472:21:41, 31 July 2009 (UTC) 1457:13:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 1443:00:57, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 1423:14:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC) 1393:02:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC) 1368:04:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC) 1354:03:40, 28 July 2009 (UTC) 1314:12:03, 28 July 2009 (UTC) 1286:15:30, 27 July 2009 (UTC) 1222:15:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC) 1095:17:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 854:In the official document 803:19:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 575:What is the point/effect? 488:14:49, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC) 420:02:53, 23 Jan 2004 (UTC) 261: 198: 162: 140: 73: 46: 2269:21:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC) 2248:21:38, 15 May 2023 (UTC) 2220:15:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC) 2108:06:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC) 2089:22:04, 3 June 2017 (UTC) 2074:20:53, 3 June 2017 (UTC) 2059:19:50, 3 June 2017 (UTC) 2031:06:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC) 1824:Is there any reason why 1810:Please do not modify it. 1152:Please do not modify it. 946:08:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 428:14:49, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC) 400:Differing number systems 2324:C-Class Europe articles 1975:, and then trough 5 km 868:09:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 496:18:29, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC) 1761:File:Autoroute A10.jpg 1609: 1601: 1116: 1112:numéro d’ordre. (...) 639: 632: 625: 618: 611: 603: 509:UK - not signed at all 159: 28:This article is rated 1696:per nom. Thank you, 1653:reopening this one. 1607: 1599: 158: 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 2237:It should be fixed. 1700:, for your work. — 1062:by one ip number. -- 104:WikiProject Highways 1851:Done (also Berlin) 2253:Okay, not exactly. 1610: 1602: 1526:N11 road (Ireland) 1259:European route E09 1250:European route E07 1241:European route E05 1232:European route E03 1184:European route E01 1056:European route E02 1015:European route E02 1013:am right, the the 856:pdf, about 130 kB 546:Naming convention? 229:WikiProject Europe 160: 34:content assessment 1931: 1919:comment added by 1776: 1429:assume good faith 1255:European route E9 1246:European route E7 1237:European route E5 1228:European route E3 1180:European route E1 751:comment added by 673: 661:comment added by 530:comment added by 282: 281: 278: 277: 274: 273: 177: 176: 173: 172: 127:Highways articles 2341: 1908: 1907: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1812: 1764: 1709: 1707: 1675:about you folk! 1579: 1574: 1569: 1559: 1557: 1503: 1501: 1470: 1468: 1441: 1439: 1391: 1389: 1329: 1323: 1303: 1154: 1032:Further comment 917:Considerations: 899:E Road distances 891: 763: 737: 733: 729: 726: 542: 416:west-to-east. -- 250: 249: 246: 243: 240: 223: 218: 217: 216: 207: 200: 199: 194: 186: 179: 129: 128: 125: 122: 119: 98: 93: 92: 91: 82: 75: 74: 69: 66: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 2349: 2348: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2274: 2273: 2233: 2231:Usage in Russia 2208: 2188: 2145: 2122: 1937: 1902: 1893: 1891: 1869: 1822: 1820:Rome wikilinks? 1817: 1808: 1703: 1701: 1600:E-01 in Ireland 1553: 1551: 1497: 1495: 1464: 1462: 1435: 1433: 1385: 1383: 1150: 1140: 1082: 1010: 970: 901: 889: 852: 832: 784: 769: 746: 724: 721: 719: 717: 679: 648: 577: 548: 525: 503: 471: 402: 369: 302: 287: 264:High-importance 248:Europe articles 247: 244: 241: 238: 237: 219: 214: 212: 193:High‑importance 192: 126: 123: 120: 117: 116: 94: 89: 87: 67: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 2347: 2345: 2337: 2336: 2331: 2326: 2321: 2316: 2311: 2306: 2301: 2296: 2291: 2286: 2276: 2275: 2272: 2271: 2258: 2254: 2238: 2236: 2232: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2212:Dr. Megkő Tóni 2207: 2204: 2187: 2184: 2144: 2141: 2121: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 1984: 1936: 1933: 1885:Hatay Province 1868: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1821: 1818: 1816: 1815: 1805:requested move 1800: 1799: 1798: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1714: 1713: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1666: 1665: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1482:81.111.114.131 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1360:81.111.114.131 1333: 1332: 1331: 1274: 1273: 1269: 1262: 1261: 1252: 1243: 1234: 1177: 1158: 1157: 1147:requested move 1141: 1139: 1138:Requested move 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1117: 1113: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1087:81.111.114.131 1081: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1009: 1006: 1005: 1004: 989: 969: 966: 965: 964: 930: 929: 925: 922: 900: 897: 896: 895: 851: 848: 831: 826: 783: 780: 768: 765: 753:178.58.132.156 743: 742: 709: 708: 678: 675: 647: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 633: 626: 619: 612: 604: 576: 573: 547: 544: 532:62.225.112.236 514: 513: 510: 502: 499: 498: 497: 482: 481: 478: 470: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 447: 446: 445: 444: 430: 429: 401: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 377: 376: 368: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 339: 338: 337: 336: 318: 317: 301: 298: 286: 283: 280: 279: 276: 275: 272: 271: 260: 254: 253: 251: 225: 224: 208: 196: 195: 187: 175: 174: 171: 170: 161: 151: 150: 143:Top-importance 139: 133: 132: 130: 113:the discussion 100: 99: 83: 71: 70: 68:Top‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2346: 2335: 2332: 2330: 2327: 2325: 2322: 2320: 2317: 2315: 2312: 2310: 2307: 2305: 2302: 2300: 2297: 2295: 2292: 2290: 2287: 2285: 2282: 2281: 2279: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2259: 2255: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2230: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2205: 2203: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2185: 2183: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2169: 2166: 2162: 2157: 2154: 2150: 2142: 2140: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2119: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2003:Sozina tunnel 2000: 1996: 1995:Sozina tunnel 1992: 1988: 1987:Sozina tunnel 1982: 1978: 1977:Sozina tunnel 1974: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1934: 1932: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1921:109.104.25.50 1918: 1910: 1906: 1900: 1888: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1871:I saw a 1974 1866: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1819: 1814: 1811: 1806: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1788:81.110.104.91 1785: 1784:WP:COMMONNAME 1781: 1780: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1762: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1712: 1708: 1706: 1699: 1698:User:Sarah777 1695: 1692: 1691: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1671:Touch of the 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1655:81.110.104.91 1652: 1648: 1647: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1606: 1598: 1585: 1581: 1580: 1578: 1573: 1568: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1558: 1556: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1520: 1506: 1502: 1500: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1469: 1467: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1449:81.110.104.91 1446: 1445: 1444: 1440: 1438: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1415:81.110.104.91 1412: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1388: 1381: 1379: 1375: 1374: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1344: 1342: 1341:WP:COMMONNAME 1338: 1334: 1328: 1322: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1302: 1297: 1293: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1278:81.110.104.91 1270: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1260: 1256: 1253: 1251: 1247: 1244: 1242: 1238: 1235: 1233: 1229: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1214:81.110.104.91 1211: 1207: 1202: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1176: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1156: 1153: 1148: 1143: 1142: 1137: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1120: 1118: 1115: 1108: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1080:Zero prefixes 1079: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1007: 1003: 999: 995: 990: 986: 985: 984: 983: 979: 975: 967: 963: 959: 955: 950: 949: 948: 947: 943: 939: 934: 926: 923: 920: 919: 918: 915: 912: 908: 904: 898: 894: 886: 885: 884: 883: 879: 875: 870: 869: 865: 861: 860:79.219.60.232 857: 849: 847: 846: 842: 838: 837:Limbo-Messiah 830: 827: 825: 824: 821: 816: 813: 810: 805: 804: 801: 797: 793: 790: 787: 781: 779: 777: 773: 766: 764: 762: 758: 754: 750: 741: 738: 736: 732: 728: 714: 713: 712: 707: 704: 700: 699: 698: 697: 694: 689: 688: 685: 676: 674: 672: 668: 664: 660: 652: 645: 638: 634: 631: 627: 624: 620: 617: 613: 610: 605: 602: 597: 596: 595: 592: 587: 586: 585: 583: 574: 572: 570: 566: 562: 558: 554: 545: 543: 541: 537: 533: 529: 523: 519: 511: 508: 507: 506: 500: 495: 491: 490: 489: 487: 479: 476: 475: 474: 469:List notation 468: 460: 457: 453: 452: 451: 450: 449: 448: 443: 440: 436: 434: 433: 432: 431: 427: 423: 422: 421: 419: 415: 410: 408: 399: 393: 389: 385: 381: 380: 379: 378: 374: 373: 372: 366: 358: 354: 350: 345: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 335: 331: 327: 322: 321: 320: 319: 316: 313: 312:Deregnaucourt 308: 307: 306: 299: 297: 296: 293: 292:Deregnaucourt 284: 269: 265: 259: 256: 255: 252: 235: 231: 230: 222: 221:Europe portal 211: 209: 206: 202: 201: 197: 191: 188: 185: 181: 168: 167: 157: 153: 152: 148: 144: 138: 135: 134: 131: 114: 110: 106: 105: 97: 86: 84: 81: 77: 76: 72: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 2234: 2209: 2189: 2170: 2164: 2160: 2158: 2152: 2148: 2146: 2123: 1993:. Also, on 1959:and goes to 1938: 1915:— Preceding 1911: 1889: 1883:and ends in 1870: 1823: 1809: 1802: 1739: 1704: 1693: 1583: 1554: 1521: 1498: 1477: 1465: 1436: 1410: 1386: 1377: 1376: 1336: 1335: 1291: 1275: 1263: 1209: 1205: 1203: 1178: 1161: 1159: 1151: 1144: 1123: 1110: 1083: 1011: 971: 968:European map 935: 931: 916: 913: 909: 905: 902: 871: 853: 833: 817: 814: 812:than E-01. 806: 798: 794: 791: 788: 785: 770: 744: 734: 730: 723: 710: 690: 680: 663:68.227.31.76 657:— Preceding 653: 649: 636: 629: 622: 615: 607: 599: 578: 557:E08 (E-road) 549: 515: 504: 483: 472: 413: 411: 403: 370: 303: 288: 263: 227: 164: 142: 102: 96:Roads portal 40:WikiProjects 2001:situation ( 1406:Google Maps 1050:This file: 747:—Preceding 582:Maccoinnich 526:—Preceding 2278:Categories 2100:Requiem mn 2066:Requiem mn 2023:Requiem mn 1705:AjaxSmack 1555:AjaxSmack 1499:AjaxSmack 1466:AjaxSmack 1437:AjaxSmack 1387:AjaxSmack 1124:autostrade 703:vLaDsINgEr 693:vLaDsINgEr 561:E08 (road) 553:E-road E08 2015:Podgorica 1981:Podgorica 1969:Podgorica 1953:Podgorica 1941:Dubrovnik 1899:Bulgarian 1673:St Thomas 1651:WP:BOLDly 1346:Aubergine 994:Charles01 938:Charles01 936:Regards 800:Mackerski 2261:Medvexxx 2240:Medvexxx 2206:Freezing 2161:anywhere 2149:(if any) 2126:ratified 2019:Petrovac 2011:Petrovac 1999:de facto 1991:Sutomore 1979:towards 1973:Sutomore 1965:Petrovac 1957:Petrovac 1949:Petrovac 1917:unsigned 1881:Kapikule 1873:road map 1853:Martinvl 1834:boldness 1723:Sarah777 1677:Sarah777 1631:Sarah777 1617:Sarah777 1538:Sarah777 1534:Rosslare 1480:Spain? 1038:SGBailey 1019:SGBailey 988:borders. 954:Martinvl 776:ZorroIII 749:unsigned 659:unsigned 528:unsigned 234:European 118:Highways 109:highways 59:Highways 2257:latest) 2165:and E15 2130:C960657 2007:de iure 1961:Albania 1945:Croatia 1838:PhilipR 1694:Support 1530:Dundalk 1522:Support 1478:outside 1292:Support 1272:scheme. 1166:Jafeluv 974:H2ppyme 874:HeikoEc 782:Ireland 767:Updates 684:Jimzoun 501:Signage 486:Wernher 426:Wernher 384:PhilipR 367:Iceland 349:PhilipR 266:on the 145:on the 30:C-class 1877:Turkey 1524:. The 1378:Oppose 1337:Oppose 850:Spaces 677:Images 609:roads. 326:Jirka6 239:Europe 190:Europe 64:Europe 36:scale. 1750:cool! 1742:harej 1584:Spain 1196:cool! 1188:harej 829:E-201 591:Heron 494:Penta 2265:talk 2244:talk 2226:map. 2216:talk 2197:talk 2193:DBaK 2177:talk 2173:DBaK 2134:talk 2104:talk 2096:link 2085:talk 2070:talk 2055:talk 2047:E851 2041:and 2027:talk 2013:and 1925:talk 1857:talk 1842:talk 1830:Rome 1826:Rome 1792:talk 1746:talk 1727:talk 1681:talk 1659:talk 1635:talk 1621:talk 1542:talk 1486:talk 1453:talk 1419:talk 1402:This 1398:This 1364:talk 1350:talk 1339:Per 1324:and 1310:talk 1282:talk 1218:talk 1210:even 1192:talk 1170:talk 1162:move 1091:talk 1068:talk 1042:talk 1023:talk 998:talk 978:talk 958:talk 942:talk 878:talk 864:talk 841:talk 757:talk 667:talk 569:talk 565:SPUI 563:? -- 536:talk 522:talk 518:SPUI 388:talk 353:talk 330:talk 258:High 2081:BIL 2051:BIL 2043:E65 2039:E80 1967:to 1887:." 1875:of 1807:. 1766:JAO 1748:) ( 1532:to 1411:two 1306:BIL 1296:E08 1206:odd 1194:) ( 1064:BIL 1008:E02 820:Rdd 720:hib 718:Pro 559:or 456:Jao 439:BIL 418:Jao 414:but 137:Top 2280:: 2267:) 2246:) 2218:) 2199:) 2179:) 2153:no 2136:) 2106:) 2087:) 2072:) 2057:) 2029:) 1951:- 1947:- 1927:) 1859:) 1844:) 1794:) 1772:• 1768:• 1752:) 1729:) 1683:) 1661:) 1637:) 1623:) 1544:) 1488:) 1455:) 1421:) 1382:— 1366:) 1352:) 1312:) 1284:) 1257:→ 1248:→ 1239:→ 1230:→ 1220:) 1198:) 1182:→ 1172:) 1164:. 1149:. 1093:) 1070:) 1044:) 1025:) 1000:) 980:) 960:) 944:) 890:—— 880:) 866:) 843:) 818:-- 809:N1 774:-- 759:) 735:ns 727:ni 722:it 669:) 555:, 538:) 516:-- 407:E4 390:) 355:) 332:) 290:-- 62:: 2263:( 2242:( 2214:( 2195:( 2175:( 2132:( 2102:( 2083:( 2068:( 2053:( 2025:( 1943:, 1923:( 1901:- 1855:( 1840:( 1790:( 1774:C 1770:T 1744:( 1725:( 1679:( 1657:( 1633:( 1619:( 1540:( 1484:( 1451:( 1417:( 1362:( 1348:( 1330:. 1308:( 1280:( 1216:( 1190:( 1168:( 1089:( 1066:( 1040:( 1021:( 996:( 976:( 956:( 940:( 876:( 862:( 839:( 755:( 731:o 725:O 665:( 567:( 534:( 520:( 386:( 351:( 328:( 270:. 169:. 149:. 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index