Knowledge

Talk:Inverse probability

Source đź“ť

74: 53: 22: 204:
Nevertheless, it is correct to say that the likelihood function itself is not necessarily a probability density. For example, if the data for 2 tosses of a coin is (heads,heads), and the probability of heads is the variable p, then adding up the likelihoods for the values p = .9, p = .8 gives
172:"the "distribution" of an unobserved variable given data is rather the likelihood function (which is not a distribution)" - this is not correct, the likelihood function is if at all the distribution of the probability of obtaining the data as a function of a parameter. 205:(.9)(.9) + (.8)(.8) = 1.45, so the set of values of the likelihood function cannot be a discrete probability density. And considering p to be a continuous variable, the liklihood function f(p) = p^2 does not integrate to 1 over the interval . 181:
For a given set of data, the maximum likelihood estimate is the value of the parameter that is most likely, because it most closely approximates the data distribution if the parameter value was equal to the maximum likelihood estimate.
124: 178:
The likelihood function is a function that gives the likelihood of a parameter given the data. A profile likelihood shows the likelihoods of different values on the parameter, given the data.
260:
Baldly saying "the "distribution" of data given the unobserved variable is rather the likelihood function (which is not a probability distribution)" is deeply confusing.
307: 114: 312: 302: 245:
If you sum it over different values of the parameter for a particular vector of data, that will not sum to one. But, contrariwise, if you sum it
90: 189: 153: 81: 58: 272:
a probability distribution. If you want to say that the likelihood function is (generally) not a probability distribution
146:
What is meant by block difference inverse probability? anyone please let me know...thanks mail me anandhmurali@gmail.com
33: 214: 193: 157: 21: 229: 210: 39: 73: 52: 185: 149: 89:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
281: 234:
The point here surely is that the likelihood function is not a probability distribution
296: 277: 285: 218: 197: 161: 86: 242:
a probability distribution for the data, given some value of the parameter.
175:^^^ All of this and in the original article is very incorrect. 15: 85:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 276:you need to be far more specific on that point. 249:for a particular value of the parameter, theb 8: 183: 47: 19: 49: 7: 79:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 308:Low-importance Statistics articles 14: 99:Knowledge:WikiProject Statistics 72: 51: 20: 313:WikiProject Statistics articles 119:This article has been rated as 102:Template:WikiProject Statistics 303:Stub-Class Statistics articles 1: 93:and see a list of open tasks. 219:09:57, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 198:23:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC) 286:19:47, 28 August 2023 (UTC) 162:16:31, 18 August 2010 (UTC) 329: 118: 67: 46: 82:WikiProject Statistics 28:This article is rated 168:likelihood definition 105:Statistics articles 34:content assessment 274:for the parameter 236:for the parameter 200: 188:comment added by 152:comment added by 139: 138: 135: 134: 131: 130: 320: 233: 164: 125:importance scale 107: 106: 103: 100: 97: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 328: 327: 323: 322: 321: 319: 318: 317: 293: 292: 227: 170: 147: 144: 104: 101: 98: 95: 94: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 326: 324: 316: 315: 310: 305: 295: 294: 291: 290: 289: 288: 258: 243: 230:Tashiro~enwiki 222: 221: 211:Tashiro~enwiki 207: 206: 190:131.156.156.30 169: 166: 154:117.204.23.175 143: 140: 137: 136: 133: 132: 129: 128: 121:Low-importance 117: 111: 110: 108: 91:the discussion 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 325: 314: 311: 309: 306: 304: 301: 300: 298: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 256: 252: 248: 247:over the data 244: 241: 237: 231: 226: 225: 224: 223: 220: 216: 212: 209: 208: 203: 202: 201: 199: 195: 191: 187: 179: 176: 173: 167: 165: 163: 159: 155: 151: 141: 126: 122: 116: 113: 112: 109: 92: 88: 84: 83: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 273: 269: 265: 261: 254: 250: 246: 239: 235: 184:— Preceding 180: 177: 174: 171: 145: 120: 80: 40:WikiProjects 257:add to one. 148:—Preceding 297:Categories 96:Statistics 87:statistics 59:Statistics 30:Stub-class 186:unsigned 150:unsigned 123:on the 278:Jheald 36:scale. 268:|θ) 238:; it 282:talk 255:will 253:sum 251:that 215:talk 194:talk 158:talk 142:BDIP 115:Low 299:: 284:) 270:is 240:is 217:) 196:) 160:) 280:( 266:x 264:( 262:p 232:: 228:@ 213:( 192:( 156:( 127:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Statistics
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Statistics
statistics
the discussion
Low
importance scale
unsigned
117.204.23.175
talk
16:31, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
unsigned
131.156.156.30
talk
23:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Tashiro~enwiki
talk
09:57, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Tashiro~enwiki
Jheald
talk
19:47, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Categories
Stub-Class Statistics articles
Low-importance Statistics articles
WikiProject Statistics articles

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑