99:
81:
109:
50:
21:
195:
It is a private members club with invitation only membership and no inherent notability. Clubs do not inherit notability from their members. The threshold for membership is not enormous. This is the self styled great and good inviting other self styled great and goo to declare themselves to be great
179:
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it's a list that shows the most notable plaintiff's attorneys in the United States. It serves as a resource to people who have been injured and many of it's members are notable and have represented the people against
31:
319:
151:
157:
324:
314:
298:
246:
226:
61:
122:
86:
27:
185:
67:
126:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
49:
296:
244:
20:
181:
266:
201:
222:
be, it needs a full discussion before it can be deleted. There is a very cursory mention in the
289:
237:
223:
233:
300:
270:
248:
205:
189:
308:
262:
197:
98:
80:
108:
214:
That's not an argument for CSD A7, that's an argument for AfD. If the article
114:
104:
229:(admittedly that won't save an AfD), and a web search brings up a number of
196:
and to be good. It lacks confirmation that it is, of itself, notable.
127:
43:
15:
180:
serious harm. For example, the "big
Tobacco" lawsuits. --
236:
coverage. I think we need to give this the full AfD.
156:This article has not yet received a rating on the
8:
218:it's important, and it's believable that it
75:
47:
77:
7:
120:This article is within the scope of
288:because it has survived an AfD ;-)
130:and the subjects encompassed by it.
66:It is of interest to the following
30:on 21 February 2013. The result of
14:
107:
97:
79:
48:
19:
320:Unknown-importance law articles
136:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Law
26:This article was nominated for
1:
301:12:09, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
271:18:14, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
249:17:47, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
206:17:08, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
190:17:01, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
341:
158:project's importance scale
155:
92:
74:
38:(withdrawn by nominator).
325:WikiProject Law articles
139:Template:WikiProject Law
315:Stub-Class law articles
56:This article is rated
261:Persuasive argument.
60:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
284:be speedily deleted
175:Contested deletion
62:content assessment
172:
171:
168:
167:
164:
163:
42:
41:
332:
294:
242:
144:
143:
140:
137:
134:
117:
112:
111:
101:
94:
93:
83:
76:
59:
53:
52:
44:
23:
16:
340:
339:
335:
334:
333:
331:
330:
329:
305:
304:
290:
238:
234:reliable source
224:Palm Beach Post
177:
141:
138:
135:
132:
131:
123:WikiProject Law
113:
106:
57:
12:
11:
5:
338:
336:
328:
327:
322:
317:
307:
306:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
254:
253:
252:
251:
209:
208:
182:Tallfromstpaul
176:
173:
170:
169:
166:
165:
162:
161:
154:
148:
147:
145:
119:
118:
102:
90:
89:
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
337:
326:
323:
321:
318:
316:
313:
312:
310:
303:
302:
299:
297:
295:
293:
287:
283:
280:This article
272:
268:
264:
263:Fiddle Faddle
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
250:
247:
245:
243:
241:
235:
232:
228:
225:
221:
217:
213:
212:
211:
210:
207:
203:
199:
198:Fiddle Faddle
194:
193:
192:
191:
187:
183:
174:
159:
153:
150:
149:
146:
129:
125:
124:
116:
110:
105:
103:
100:
96:
95:
91:
88:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
55:
51:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
291:
285:
281:
279:
239:
230:
219:
215:
178:
142:law articles
121:
68:WikiProjects
35:
128:legal field
309:Categories
292:Ritchie333
240:Ritchie333
115:Law portal
58:Stub-class
36:Snow keep
28:deletion
282:can not
286:at all
216:claims
64:scale.
231:maybe
220:might
267:talk
227:here
202:talk
186:talk
34:was
152:???
133:Law
87:Law
311::
269:)
204:)
188:)
265:(
200:(
184:(
160:.
70::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
