Talk:Ignazio Ciufolini

1254:

less personal Ciufolini-Iorio quarrels and the Ciufolini's misconduct on ArXiv. If Iorio, for whatever reasons like to expose Ciufolini, it does not matter, provided he rely upon on objective pieces of information not related to their personal issues. And this is the case. Then, Headbomb, now you object since ArXiv retracted its own comments: this implies that they were actually good until they were in place. Now, not only ArXiv has reinstaed them in full (and, as it was shown, they did not remove them because of an error), but it has also reinforced them by further exposing Ciufolini with another case of pseudonym, Gianni Felici. On this basis, blatantly protecting Ciufolini from the consequences of his own actions with speculations on the Knowledge's rules far from reality is clearly unfair. So, please, do not censor anymore. En passant, as a further demonstration of your partiality and favorable bias toward Ciufolini, you did not object anything in leaving in the article the mention to the cover of the Nature journal among his awards and honours, which is clearly absurd. Not to say about the latest change on the fact that the Occhialini prize was given in his hands by Jocelyn Bell, in a clearly promotional tone. So, please, do not censor anymore and, please, look solely at the merit and the content of the article, not to Knowledge-administrators-paranoia observations like that I just popped out for this sole scope (and the other guys staying here just for promoting Ciufolini? Cricecio? Lalelonoit, and others? Nothing to say about them?) and other similar matters. Thank you.

1526:

a peer-reviewed journal, the primary source was arXiv itself and the other databases still displaying the name of Ciufolini at those preprints. It does not matter why in the past time arXiv publicly exposed Ciufolini (and why now they have decided to cover it up). It is not true that it is not possible to clarify why the arXiv's statement was changed: on the contrary, it was actually done: arXiv invoked alleged "changes in their policies", not errors in the identitiy of Forst/Felici. Moreover, this story it has been treated by other independent third-party sources such as Neuroskeptic in Discovermagazine, Retraction Watch and COPE. Finally, the Letter by Iorio was retracted only because of alleged legal reasons, not because it turne dout to be incorrect. Thus, I think it is more fair to leave the well balanced version by the previous Editor. Thank you.

665:

repeated statements by him whose content was blatantly false and defamatory such as I would have been dismissed by all institutions, no institutions would seek me, nobody would read my papers, as well as the disclosure of confidential and proprietary information obtained do not know how, about my relationships with some scientific journals. Indeed, I'm a physicist, not a lawyer and, given the situation of justice in Italy, I would deeply ashamed to let any magistrate waste time with things like that. Contrary to Mr. Ciufolini, evidently. The judgment of similar events is left to readers. ’

1541:

act here in Knowledge only and always to support Ciufolini's positions. This is perfectly legitimate, of course, and I have nothing against your preferences. The (serious) problem is that, unfortunately, you do that by sistematically attempting to remove and censore pieces of verifiable information such as journal articles, etc., showing a disagreement with the Ciufolini's views. This is unfair, and, in my opinion, you should act differently. I hope also that you will not start some endless and sterile tit-for-tat. Thank you for your cooperation.

634:

our results attached; the interested reader can ask us for them. In one case (28 March 2003 and 30 March 2003), Ciufolini asked us to prepare a short table with our results in .doc format in view of a video-conference with NASA officials to be attended in the following days by Ciufolini. A few days before, 26 March 2003, we e-mailed the .pdf of Iorio and Morea (2004) to Ciufolini. Later, on 7 September 2003, we discussed the impact of the GGM01C Earth gravity model on the LAGEOS–LAGEOS II combination with Pavlis.’

231: 689:

Lorenzo Iorio. I can not find any evidence that a physicist named Giacomo Renzetti even exist; I did not find any personal page or any page on any Univerity. The e-mail shown on Springer is not related to a University. Please, can you check if Renzetti does really exist or if it is a pseudonim, before restoring the section? If the accusation did stand on solid basis, other physicists than Renzetti should have recognized it, and it should have been found on other media;

1481:

b) The sources I included are reliable and independent. It is not true that blogs are not reliable. Blogs, if trustable, are currently used as sources of independent, third-party information throughout Knowledge c) A Letter to the Editor means that it has been peer-reviewed and approved by not less than one other academic, including the Editor in Chief of the Journal. Censoring this information would be a violation of Knowledge policies about impartiality.

606:

submit articles under his own name. This is in explicit violation of arXiv policies. Roughly similar content, contrasting the relative merits of the LAGEOS and GP-B measurements of the frame-dragging effect, can be found in pp. 43–45 of: ’ Evidently, the moderators changed it as a consequences of further, steady actions by Ciufolini. It would be interesting to know the target(s) of such further papers which Ciufolini repeatedly tried to submit to ArXiv.

548:

Ciufolini did not limit to do what you intended. Apart from the fact that, from ArXiv words, it seems he is currently engaged in an ongoing activity as described, the problems raise from also from a strictly scientific point of view. Indeed, it seems that the content of his article was flawed with incorrect statements, citations, etc.: ArXiv speaks about 'inappropriate'. Moreover, see the comment #282 by Kris Krogh here

263: 169: 145: 723::"Remove immediately any contentious material about a living person that is unsourced or poorly sourced; that is a conjectural interpretation of a source (see No original research); that relies on self-published sources, unless written by the subject of the BLP (see below); or that relies on sources that fail in some other way to meet Verifiability standards". I'm removing the section on this basis. 114: 629:, I added a section to the alleged plagiarism by Ciufolini with references. As you may note, there are neither personal attacks nor offensive words at all. I included also a reference where Ciufolini rejects such accusations, and a reference where an independent evaluation is offered. In particular, the plagiarism issue is discussed in Section 6, pp. 508-509 of Ref. . Among other things, 1023:

Ciufolini, but by an alleged-and quite suspect-change in their policies. Readers must know all of this story. After 5 years that ArXiv moderators kept their original comment implicitly addressing Ciufolini, and after 4 months that they kept the modified comment explicitly addressing him, now they suddenly declare that both their own comments does not reflect their current policies...

21: 712:: "Criticism and praise should be included if they can be sourced to reliable secondary sources, so long as the material is presented responsibly, conservatively, and in a disinterested tone. Do not give disproportionate space to particular viewpoints". Lorenzo Iorio and Giacomo Renzetti can not be considered reliable sources; 179: 1208: 1571:

how you do that). If you do not refuse to "put the eye to the telescope", you will see that on the internet there is full evidence of it. And now, please, stop supporting Ciufolini by censoring evidences (as you repeatedly tried to do in the past) raised by other people disagreeing with him. Thank you.

1634:

About the lawsuits, the following statement does not represent the actual legal situation: "He sued twice the italian physicist Lorenzo Iorio for defamation. Iorio was acquitted of these charges in both trials ." The above statement is misleading, suggesting that the accusation of defamation against

1619:

the section of "Awards and Honours" has been removed without reason in 2014 (relevant international awards are a measure of the quality of research of a scientist and should always be included in a scientific bio). The other scientists included in Knowledge have a complete list of their international

1525:

Dear Cricecio, I do not agree with you. This matter has already been discussed in the proper place and settled. The evidence shows that it is not true that the only source of the story is the paper by L. Iorio. Apart from the fact that it was accepted without external review by the Editor-in-Chief of

1510:

The only source of the story is the paper by L. Iorio. The arXiv site did not state anything (at least not now) that can support the claim by Iorio and it is not possible to clarify why in the past time arXiv publicly exposed Ciufolini, and why the statement was changed. Since the accusation does not

1480:

I added that section by adding also a link to Retraction Watch, which mentioned this story. Some considerations are in order. a) The individual who circulated this story, whatever conflict of interest may have with Ciufolini, did not have part in uncovering this story, which is entirely due to arXiv

688:

since plagiarims is a serious accusation that does not stand on reliable sources. The only source is Lorenzo Iorio. The article by Giacomo Renzetti can not be considered a reliable source since I tried to check on Google Scholar and found only four papers by Renzetti, that are reporting the thesis by

1555:

Dear 56OKLO34, if you did check my editing history you saw that I correct and edit also other articles. This one is becaming only an annoying issue, and for the moment I prefer to let it set for a while. I asked for opinions and wait one day before restoring the voice, to see if other authors agreed

1540:

Moreover, dear Cricecio, let me remark that, while now you ask other editors to discuss here before restoring the CorporateM version, you did not do the same when you altered it. Instead, you should have discussed that issue here before altering it. A final point. Your editing history shows that you

664:

area: ‘I permit to inform readers that Mr. Ciufolini formally sued me for defamation more than two years ago for some statements attributed to me in this blog. Instead, I did not sue for defamation Mr. Ciufolini, here hidden under the nickname Verità, although he offered me many occasions after some

633:

writes: ‘In regard to the combination of Eq. (10), our papers on it are available on the Internet since April 2003. Moreover, we personally know the authors of Ciufolini and Pavlis (2005) having collaborated with them for some years and sent them various e-mails between April and September 2003 with

464:

case. Its moderators, in removing a paper by Ciufolini, explicitly wrote: “This submission has been removed because 'G.Forst' is a pseudonym of Ignazio Ciufolini, who repeatedly submits inappropriate articles under pseudonyms. This is in explicit violation of arXiv policies. Roughly similar content

1654:

In my opinion the current biography is providing a strongly unbalanced point of view that aims at denigrating my carrier and accomplishments. Therefore, I wish to ask you to remove the page about me on Knowledge: it seems that the page is acting only as a magnet for editing wars that bring unwanted

1308:

In a fair, non-promotional and balanced biography, also negative results must be included. I added the public outcome of academic evaluations. I also removed the statemnets on his supervisors because written in a clearly promotional tone and because they were supported solely by his own curriculum,

1022:

I have added the following content since it is not gossip based on uncertain, poor or fabricated sources. It is not defamatory. Moreover, please note that the strange decision by ArXiv to remove their own comments is not motivated by possible errors by them in the identification of G. Forst with I.

1570:

Dear Cricecio, you cannot simply ignore facts just because you do not like them. According to you, it sounds as if Iorio had fabricated or invented the whole story, while he simply aired what arXiv repeatedly made to Ciufolini (I repeat: there is nothing bad in that you support him: the problem is

949:

This section was removed, as it referenced primary and/or non-reliable sources. If for whatever reason these allegations of plagiarism are covered in an independent, reliable source, then they can be included. Until then this quite frankly smells like a personal conflict being played out here, and

1610:

Dear Sirs, I am Ignazio Ciufolini (the Knowledge staff verified my identity) and I am writing here because this page about my biography is being used for libelous statements. For some reason the page provides an unbalanced point of view, giving undue attention to controversies and lawsuits, while

1556:

or not. Maybe however I think will replace the parte about awards (why it was removed? Did it has something to do with the sockpuppeting affair?). I remember you that the only source for the sockpuppetting story is the paper by L. Iorio: Neuroskeptick and the other blog were discussing that paper.

1402:

author that quotes the paper written by one of the involved people. I don't feel that could be considered significant secondary coverage, but I will let other editors chime in. In the meantime however, your entire Knowledge editing history is limited to attempting to add this material to this one

1253:

I do not agree with you, Headbomb and FreeRangeFrog. For the tone you used, inappropriate in some places, and the reasons you displayed, I feel you are not impartial and ar too emotively biased in favor of Ciufolini. One should clearly separate two things which are actually different: the more or

605:

Now, I wish to add some more details on this issue. The comment by the ArXiv moderators, in its present form, was originally different. Until May 2011, at least, it was as follows: ‘This submission has been removed because ‘G.Forst’ is a pseudonym of a physicist based in Italy who is unwilling to

1425:

Reinstated. The article is a peer-reviewed one, published as a Letter to the Editor. Please, keep the focus on the matter of the facts, and do not get misled by such wiki-paranoia pseudoargument. You cannot violate any conceivable rules just because of your suspects and personal preferences. You

547:

since it would tend to diminish the impact of actions which, for me, are serious. ArXiv is not a hyperspecialized place with a narrow audience. It is a worldwide venue for scientisits from all fields, widely followed also by mass media. Moreover, please, permit me to let you note that, actually,

1682:

Dear Sirs, I am Lorenzo Iorio (the Knowledge staff may want to verify my identity if they are so kind to explain me how to do so), and I am writing here because the claims by Mr. Ciufolini here about the outcome of his two lawsuits against me are blatantly false. Indeed,

1309:

not from independent sources. I also removed his partecipation in the old LISA etc stuff. since it is common to any researchers and insufficient to single out an individual with a biographical article. Please, do not censore the academic evaluations. Thank you.

1210:

is a reply to an email/query by Iorio. Since arXiv have retracted their statement, the material is no longer appropriate for inclusion, and anything related to the Iorio/Ciufolini feud should be supported by reliable sources unaffiliated with either.

1206:

I noticed that around the time all the SPAs showed up, Lorenzo Iorio has been spamming pretty much every online venues he could find about the arXiv misconduct, some of those linked above, who is apparently hellbent on exposing Ciufolini. For example

420:

Do you think that it is necessary to put the bibliometric information under a specific section? In other biographies of living physicists this information is under the main section. I think it shall be preferable to uniform the article to the other

363:

is from the same Italian region (Lazio) where Ciufolini and most of his coworkers live and work. I invite this contributor not to vandalize/censor valuable pieces of information just because she/he does not like them. Thank you. Best regards.

730::" Material that may adversely affect a person's reputation should be treated with special care; in many jurisdictions, repeating a defamatory claim is actionable, and there are additional protections for subjects who are not public figures". 552:. In it, he wrote: "I didn't see anything of substance in the paper. The references it cited did not show what was attributed to them." This attitude by Ciufolini has been remarked also by others in formal peer-review publications. Cheers. 589:

about the nature and the extent of the misconduct, but, unfortunately, it was a misconduct. The reality cannot be changed by merely changing words), not a mere use of pseudonyms. I hope you will discuss here calmly. Have a nice time.

1649:

So, Lorenzo Iorio was acquitted from some of the accusations only because the trials endured too long and the crimes were statute barred. Anyway, I do not see how this information is more relevant than academic achievements.

514:

Many Knowledge articles contain material on people who are not well known, even if they are notable enough for their own article. Material that may adversely affect a person's reputation should be treated with special

1791: 521:" shall be used in relation to episodes such as if the subject did published papers containing false data, for plagiarism or for scientific frauds. In this case it seems IC did tried to create multiple accounts on 41: 1368: 1786: 585:, please, permit me to dissent with you. In no way there were any personal offences against Ciufolini. Nonetheless, it was a serious misconduct (we can plain and politely discuss as done with 1149: 1268:

Nope. I did not even know Ignazio Ciufolini existed until this article was brought to our attention as problematic. I am not an administrator. I am one of the editors who volunteer at

761:

Forst, G. F. (23 December 2007). "A critical analysis of the GP-B mission. I: on the impossibility of a reliable measurement of the gravitomagnetic precession of the GP-B gyroscopes".

1426:

cannot simply deny the very basic facts that now there are several independent, reliable and third parties sources from all over the world! They are not even anonymous, as you mean.

1125:

Forst, G. (23 December 2007). "A critical analysis of the GP-B mission. I: on the impossibility of a reliable measurement of the gravitomagnetic precession of the GP-B gyroscopes".

240: 155: 93: 1280:

in order to be included. Otherwise the material will be kept off the article, period. Knowledge is not a battleground for disputes among people out there in the real world.

950:

Knowledge is not a battleground for people's disputes. I also removed the citation index section, as that is relevant only if the bio happens to be discussed for deletion.

1806: 1796: 51: 1324:

Thank you for the information. I found that the section about the supervisors of the PhD Thesis have been restored. I found some other sources and added the quotations.

1511:

rely on a reliable source, I think it is better to restore the Knowledge article to the previous state. I'm waiting for other users opinions before restoring the page.

1496:

The sum total of Retraction Watch's "coverage" of the issue is a a one-line link to the same blog already discussed here. That is not a significant secondary source.

997:, so please comment there. In the meantime, I'm not going to play 3RR over negative material in a bio, so please leave it out until there is consensus to include it. 1635:

Iorio were unfounded. Instead, the decrees of acquittal that are readable in the references (in Italian) state that some of the crimes were statute barred. See:

1776: 98: 440:. I think it is a good idea! I also appreciated that you added more NASA ADS metrics. I think it should be done also for other living physicists. See you. 81:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or 465:

to this article, contrasting the relative merits of the LAGEOS and GP-B measurements of the frame-dragging effect, can be found in pp. 43--45 of: ”

922: 1801: 1781: 297: 197: 73: 1623:

Relevant information about my career and research have been removed, for example, but not only, the information about my Ph.D. dissertation, etc.

1188:

there. I notified you in your talk page that I undid your edit, and pointed you to the relevant archived discussion on the BLP noticeboard.

330: 201: 205: 843:

Iorio, Lorenzo (March 2007). "An assessment of the measurement of the Lense–Thirring effect in the Earth gravity field, in reply to:

1379:

italian newspaper, known also abroad, and a blog in Serbian. Please, keep it and, if you want, discuss the matter here. Thank you.

196:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 1749:

courts have acknowledged that Mr. Ciufolini, in fact, acted as a provoker. Moreover, Mr. Ciufolini may not describe my actions as

281: 192: 150: 1221: 975: 273: 1501: 125: 1669: 853: 291: 325:. Indeed, it is far more complete, reliable and detailed, offering a full suite of bibliometrics indexes. Moreover, 847:

On the reliability of the so far performed tests for measuring the Lense–Thirring effect with the LAGEOS satellites

506:

Given their potential impact on biography subjects' lives, biographies must be fair to their subjects at all times.

493: 525:

using pseudonyms, and the episode can not be considered as serious as "Scientific misconduits" can lead to think.

509: 27: 1497: 334: 1604: 113: 1758: 1061:

moderators removed their comment addressing Ciufolini, posted in September 2013, because of a change in the

277: 82: 626: 582: 1665: 287: 892: 813: 131: 1034:, Ciufolini repeatedly submitted inappropriate articles under pseudonyms, in explicit violation of the 845:

On the measurement of the Lense–Thirring effect using the nodes of the LAGEOS satellites, in reply to

872: 793: 670: 666: 642: 638: 611: 607: 595: 591: 572: 568: 557: 553: 481: 470: 466: 445: 441: 369: 365: 92:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to 549: 399: 355:, and I agree that it is more trustable. Thus, I restored its metrics. Nonetheless, I left those by 20: 1572: 1557: 1542: 1527: 1512: 1482: 1427: 1380: 1372: 1349: 1325: 1310: 1255: 1167: 735: 586: 540: 526: 437: 422: 403: 398:

is far more complete and reliable. It returns also lot of useful bibliometric parameters. Thanks.

1754: 1576: 1561: 1546: 1531: 1516: 1486: 1431: 1414: 1384: 1353: 1329: 1314: 1283: 1259: 1242: 1217: 1191: 1171: 1126: 1031: 1000: 971: 953: 862: 762: 739: 530: 497: 426: 96:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see 230: 567:

Moreover, in the peer-review literature there are, actually, allegations of plagiarism by him.

329:

is used in evaluation precesses by several academic institutions, research organizations, etc.

1461: 1456:. If you can find reliable, secondary sources that attest to these issues, you can add them. 1363:

Misconduct reinstated. Peer-review article and other third-parties independent sources found

1229: 983: 880: 876: 801: 184: 1739:″, which states that one cannot be punished if she/he acted in a state of anger due to an 1395: 1273: 1081: 1038:

policies. In particular, in December 2007 he used the pseudonym “G. Forst” to post on the

994: 908: 829: 89: 1398:

as well). The source you added is a blog (albeit a Discover Magazine one, granted) by an

1403:

article, which rules out your capability to remain neutral. What you should be doing is

797: 1269: 1225: 1047: 979: 492:" since I think the previous title can be considered challenging some guidelines about 391: 387: 356: 352: 322: 1770: 1453: 1408: 1376: 1213: 967: 698: 630: 1629:

Someone added a misleading sentence about the lawsuits between me and Lorenzo Iorio.

1457: 1449: 1185: 1150:"Reply to an inquiry concerning the use of the psuedonym G. Forst by I. Ciufolini" 637:

I hope all is better now. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Best wishes.

300:) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. ( 656:

For the benefit of readers, I translate a recent Iorio's post on the online blog

543:, thank you for your contribution. I think that, perhaps, it is better to remove 1103: 168: 144: 1655:

attention on the libelous attacks against me instead of on my academic works.

1276:. As we have agreed here and elsewhere, these "issues" and "scandals" require 884: 174: 272:

to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include

30:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: 1762: 1673: 1580: 1565: 1550: 1535: 1520: 1505: 1490: 1465: 1435: 1420: 1388: 1357: 1333: 1318: 1289: 1263: 1248: 1234: 1197: 1175: 1006: 988: 959: 743: 674: 646: 615: 599: 576: 561: 534: 474: 449: 430: 407: 373: 359:. Please, notice that the IP of the contributor who removed the metrics by 338: 693:

Accusation of plagiarism can be considered breaking several guidelines of

395: 383: 360: 348: 326: 318: 1645:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Ignazio_Ciufolini#cite_note-endofsecondtrial-19

805: 1753:

because they were not recognized as such by the courts. Best regards.

1057:

moderators retracted that paper in January 2008. As of December 2013,

965:

Arxiv moderators are an independent/reliable/non-primary source here.

867: 1699:

me in both trials (please, go to Google translate: the italian word ″

1611:

information concerning my research accomplishments has been removed.

1348:

section since I think it is an outstanding result for any researcher.

1050: 784: 1644: 1638: 782:

Ciufolini, Ignazio (September 2007). "Dragging of inertial frames".

204:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 1639:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Ignazio_Ciufolini#cite_note-endoftrial-18

1131: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1039: 1035: 1027: 767: 661: 522: 461: 1369:

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

1344:

I restored the information about the cover page of Nature in the

1043: 550:

http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=104694&page=16

993:

Whether they are or are not is a good topic for discussion at

270:

contributor has declared a personal or professional connection

257: 107: 88:

from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially

65: 15: 1792:

Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles

1626:

Speculative information about controversies have been added.

229: 1082:"Gravity Probe B, Arxiv and Mr. Ciufolini: a curious case" 923:"Relatività, l'Università del Salento batte i fisici Usa" 721:

Remove unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material

301: 1787:

Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles

1662:

University of Salento and Centro Fermi (Rome, Italy)

1394:

Removed. Please seek consensus here (and ideally at

500:

I paied attention at the guidelines under paragraph

1407:editing this article, since it's likely you have a 1745:. Thus, using the same article of the penal code, 1367:I've found a peer-review article published in the 1018:Misconducts reinstated: independent sources found 680:Removed the section "Allegations of plagiarism" 652:Legal actions by I. Ciufolini against L. Iorio 8: 1144: 1142: 1304:Academic Evaluations and other changes made 111: 139: 1807:Articles edited by connected contributors 1448:A letter to the editor and blogs are not 1130: 866: 766: 1797:Science and academia work group articles 1597:Request of deletion by Ignazio Ciufolini 1073: 753: 141: 1375:, a blog hosted by the national-level 904: 900: 890: 825: 821: 811: 1371:, and other independent sources from 695:Knowledge Biography of Living Persons 7: 929:(blog) (in Italian). 1 December 2013 484:. I changed the section title from " 351:is certainly not less complete than 313:Reliable source for citation metrics 190:This article is within the scope of 1777:Biography articles of living people 1026:According to the moderators of the 241:the science and academia work group 130:It is of interest to the following 1046:mission, direct competitor of his 14: 728:People who are relatively unknown 1239:Yeah, that's never a good sign. 1104:"Gravity Probe B and pseudonyms" 851:by I. Ciufolini and E. Pavlis". 390:. As per the Knowledge article, 261: 177: 167: 143: 112: 71:This article must adhere to the 19: 1454:bibliographies of living people 214:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 26:This article was nominated for 1802:WikiProject Biography articles 1782:Start-Class biography articles 1278:significant secondary coverage 408:10:26, 12 September 2013 (UTC) 374:14:25, 11 September 2013 (UTC) 217:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 1763:15:31, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 1674:18:20, 10 February 2020 (UTC) 1249:18:19, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1235:03:45, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1198:03:13, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1176:13:31, 21 December 2013 (UTC) 494:Biographies of living persons 490:Misconducts on ArXiv database 475:22:26, 29 November 2013 (UTC) 450:21:45, 29 November 2013 (UTC) 431:15:22, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 339:15:27, 5 September 2013 (UTC) 238:This article is supported by 74:biographies of living persons 50:, 9 December 2013 (UTC), see 1030:database, maintained by the 1007:18:44, 7 December 2013 (UTC) 989:05:57, 7 December 2013 (UTC) 960:01:30, 5 December 2013 (UTC) 744:12:02, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 675:17:30, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 660:of a local newspaper of the 647:19:09, 1 December 2013 (UTC) 616:15:25, 1 December 2013 (UTC) 600:15:16, 1 December 2013 (UTC) 577:12:18, 1 December 2013 (UTC) 562:12:15, 1 December 2013 (UTC) 535:11:48, 1 December 2013 (UTC) 202:contribute to the discussion 1358:18:11, 9 January 2014 (UTC) 1334:18:06, 9 January 2014 (UTC) 1319:14:17, 2 January 2014 (UTC) 1290:17:58, 2 January 2014 (UTC) 1264:13:47, 2 January 2014 (UTC) 854:Planetary and Space Science 734:I hope in your cooperation. 394:has several drawbacks, and 344:NASA ADS or Google Scholar? 302:declared here and elsewhere 86:must be removed immediately 1823: 1340:Awards and Honours changes 386:should be used instead of 1581:15:56, 24 June 2014 (UTC) 1566:15:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC) 1551:13:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC) 1536:13:10, 24 June 2014 (UTC) 1521:09:27, 23 June 2014 (UTC) 885:10.1016/j.pss.2006.08.001 684:I'm removing The section 621:Allegations of plagiarism 508:"), and in particular in 460:I added a section on the 237: 162: 138: 1659:Prof. Ignazio Ciufolini 1506:07:46, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 1491:07:22, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 1476:Use of sockpuppets added 1466:20:47, 12 May 2014 (UTC) 1436:20:14, 12 May 2014 (UTC) 1421:20:08, 12 May 2014 (UTC) 1389:20:02, 12 May 2014 (UTC) 1042:a paper criticizing the 686:Allegation of Plagiarism 414:Bibliometric information 268:The following Knowledge 40:, 10 February 2020, see 877:2007P&SS...55..503I 1691:courts, headed by two 519:Scientific misconducts 456:Scientific misconducts 234: 120:This article is rated 1707:″, the italian word ″ 545:in the ArXiv database 486:Scientific misconduts 282:neutral point of view 233: 193:WikiProject Biography 1409:conflict of interest 274:conflict of interest 156:Science and Academia 1498:NorthBySouthBaranof 1373:Discover (magazine) 806:10.1038/nature06071 798:2007Natur.449...41C 1346:Awards and Honours 1152:. 19 December 2013 1053:-based tests. The 1032:Cornell University 510:WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE 235: 220:biography articles 126:content assessment 1666:Ignazio.Ciufolini 310: 309: 288:Ignazio.Ciufolini 256: 255: 252: 251: 248: 247: 106: 105: 64: 63: 60: 59: 1814: 1609: 1603: 1450:reliable sources 1419: 1417: 1288: 1286: 1247: 1245: 1233: 1196: 1194: 1162: 1161: 1159: 1157: 1146: 1137: 1136: 1134: 1122: 1116: 1115: 1113: 1111: 1100: 1094: 1093: 1091: 1089: 1078: 1005: 1003: 987: 958: 956: 939: 938: 936: 934: 919: 913: 912: 906: 902: 898: 896: 888: 870: 840: 834: 833: 827: 823: 819: 817: 809: 779: 773: 772: 770: 758: 717:Reliable Sources 627:Montecristo10000 583:Montecristo10000 317:I prefer to use 265: 264: 258: 222: 221: 218: 215: 212: 198:join the project 187: 185:Biography portal 182: 181: 180: 171: 164: 163: 158: 147: 140: 123: 117: 116: 108: 94:this noticeboard 66: 32: 31: 23: 16: 1822: 1821: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1767: 1766: 1747:two independent 1727:of the Italian 1615:In particular: 1607: 1605:BLP noticeboard 1601: 1599: 1478: 1415: 1412: 1365: 1342: 1306: 1284: 1281: 1243: 1240: 1212: 1192: 1189: 1186:reliable source 1165: 1155: 1153: 1148: 1147: 1140: 1124: 1123: 1119: 1109: 1107: 1106:. December 2013 1102: 1101: 1097: 1087: 1085: 1084:. December 2013 1080: 1079: 1075: 1020: 1001: 998: 966: 954: 951: 947: 942: 932: 930: 921: 920: 916: 899: 889: 842: 841: 837: 820: 810: 792:(7158): 41–47. 781: 780: 776: 760: 759: 755: 751: 682: 654: 623: 480:In response to 458: 418: 381: 346: 315: 262: 219: 216: 213: 210: 209: 183: 178: 176: 153: 124:on Knowledge's 121: 12: 11: 5: 1820: 1818: 1810: 1809: 1804: 1799: 1794: 1789: 1784: 1779: 1769: 1768: 1715:″) as per the 1680: 1679: 1658: 1653: 1643: 1633: 1631: 1630: 1627: 1624: 1621: 1614: 1598: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1477: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1364: 1361: 1341: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1305: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1201: 1200: 1181:There isn't a 1164: 1163: 1138: 1117: 1095: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1048:frame-dragging 1019: 1016: 1014: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 946: 943: 941: 940: 914: 861:(4): 503–511. 835: 774: 752: 750: 747: 732: 731: 724: 713: 702: 681: 678: 653: 650: 622: 619: 604: 565: 564: 537: 457: 454: 453: 452: 417: 411: 392:Google Scholar 388:Google Scholar 380: 377: 357:Google Scholar 353:Google Scholar 345: 342: 331:212.27.204.226 323:Google Scholar 314: 311: 308: 307: 306: 305: 266: 254: 253: 250: 249: 246: 245: 236: 226: 225: 223: 189: 188: 172: 160: 159: 148: 136: 135: 129: 118: 104: 103: 99:this help page 83:poorly sourced 69: 62: 61: 58: 57: 56: 55: 45: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1819: 1808: 1805: 1803: 1800: 1798: 1795: 1793: 1790: 1788: 1785: 1783: 1780: 1778: 1775: 1774: 1772: 1765: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1755:Iorio.Lorenzo 1752: 1748: 1744: 1743: 1738: 1737: 1732: 1731: 1726: 1725: 1720: 1719: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1695:judges, have 1694: 1690: 1686: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1660: 1656: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1641: 1640: 1636: 1628: 1625: 1622: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1612: 1606: 1596: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1475: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1418: 1416:FreeRangeFrog 1410: 1406: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1377:La Repubblica 1374: 1370: 1362: 1360: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1303: 1291: 1287: 1285:FreeRangeFrog 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1246: 1244:FreeRangeFrog 1238: 1237: 1236: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1209: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1199: 1195: 1193:FreeRangeFrog 1187: 1184: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1151: 1145: 1143: 1139: 1133: 1128: 1121: 1118: 1105: 1099: 1096: 1083: 1077: 1074: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1024: 1017: 1015: 1008: 1004: 1002:FreeRangeFrog 996: 992: 991: 990: 985: 981: 977: 973: 969: 964: 963: 962: 961: 957: 955:FreeRangeFrog 945:Controversies 944: 928: 924: 918: 915: 910: 901:|access-date= 894: 886: 882: 878: 874: 869: 868:gr-qc/0608119 864: 860: 856: 855: 850: 846: 839: 836: 831: 822:|access-date= 815: 807: 803: 799: 795: 791: 787: 786: 778: 775: 769: 764: 757: 754: 748: 746: 745: 741: 737: 729: 725: 722: 718: 714: 711: 707: 706:Writing style 703: 700: 699:Knowledge:BLP 696: 692: 691: 690: 687: 679: 677: 676: 672: 668: 663: 659: 651: 649: 648: 644: 640: 635: 632: 631:Lorenzo Iorio 628: 620: 618: 617: 613: 609: 602: 601: 597: 593: 588: 584: 579: 578: 574: 570: 563: 559: 555: 551: 546: 542: 538: 536: 532: 528: 524: 520: 517:". The term " 516: 511: 507: 503: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 478: 477: 476: 472: 468: 463: 455: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 434: 433: 432: 428: 424: 415: 412: 410: 409: 405: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 378: 376: 375: 371: 367: 362: 358: 354: 350: 343: 341: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 312: 303: 299: 296: 293: 289: 286: 285: 283: 279: 278:autobiography 275: 271: 267: 260: 259: 243: 242: 232: 228: 227: 224: 207: 206:documentation 203: 199: 195: 194: 186: 175: 173: 170: 166: 165: 161: 157: 152: 149: 146: 142: 137: 133: 127: 119: 115: 110: 109: 101: 100: 95: 91: 87: 84: 80: 76: 75: 70: 68: 67: 53: 49: 46: 43: 39: 36: 35: 34: 33: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 1750: 1746: 1741: 1740: 1735: 1734: 1733:, entitled ″ 1729: 1728: 1723: 1722: 1717: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1685:two distinct 1684: 1681: 1664: 1661: 1657: 1652: 1648: 1642: 1637: 1632: 1613: 1600: 1479: 1404: 1399: 1366: 1345: 1343: 1307: 1277: 1182: 1166: 1154:. Retrieved 1120: 1108:. Retrieved 1098: 1086:. Retrieved 1076: 1025: 1021: 1013: 948: 931:. Retrieved 926: 917: 893:cite journal 858: 852: 849:by L. Iorio, 848: 844: 838: 814:cite journal 789: 783: 777: 756: 733: 727: 720: 716: 709: 705: 694: 685: 683: 657: 655: 636: 624: 603: 580: 566: 544: 518: 513: 505: 501: 489: 485: 459: 421:biographies. 419: 413: 382: 347: 316: 294: 269: 239: 191: 132:WikiProjects 97: 85: 78: 72: 47: 37: 1742:unjust fact 1736:Provocation 1724:article 599 1718:paragraph 2 1709:assoluzione 1689:independent 1156:21 December 1110:21 December 1088:21 December 927:20centesimi 658:20centesimi 498:WP:BLPSTYLE 122:Start-class 1771:Categories 1730:Penal code 1069:References 933:2 December 749:References 667:GundarionX 639:GundarionX 608:GundarionX 592:GundarionX 569:GundarionX 554:GundarionX 467:GundarionX 442:GundarionX 436:Yes, dear 366:Danguard00 52:discussion 42:discussion 1713:acquittal 1711:″ means ″ 1705:acquitted 1703:″ means ″ 1697:acquitted 1400:anonymous 1132:0712.3934 903:requires 824:requires 768:0712.3934 400:Referee23 211:Biography 151:Biography 90:libellous 1693:distinct 1573:56OKLO34 1558:Cricecio 1543:56OKLO34 1528:56OKLO34 1513:Cricecio 1483:56OKLO34 1428:Rambilon 1396:WP:BLP/N 1381:Rambilon 1350:Cricecio 1326:Cricecio 1311:Rambilon 1256:Rambilon 1222:contribs 1214:Headbomb 1168:Rambilon 1065:policy. 995:WP:BLP/N 976:contribs 968:Headbomb 736:Cricecio 587:Cricecio 541:Cricecio 527:Cricecio 438:Cricecio 423:Cricecio 396:NASA ADS 384:NASA ADS 379:NASA ADS 361:NASA ADS 349:NASA ADS 327:NASA ADS 319:NASA ADS 298:contribs 28:deletion 1721:of the 1701:assolto 1620:prizes. 1458:Cwobeel 1226:physics 980:physics 873:Bibcode 794:Bibcode 710:balance 502:Balance 416:section 1751:crimes 1183:single 1051:LAGEOS 785:Nature 488:" in " 280:, and 128:scale. 1230:books 1127:arXiv 1063:ArXiv 1059:ArXiv 1055:ArXiv 1040:ArXiv 1036:ArXiv 1028:ArXiv 984:books 905:|url= 863:arXiv 826:|url= 763:arXiv 662:Lecce 625:Dear 581:Dear 539:Dear 523:ArXiv 496:. In 462:ArXiv 321:than 1759:talk 1687:and 1670:talk 1577:talk 1562:talk 1547:talk 1532:talk 1517:talk 1502:talk 1487:talk 1462:talk 1452:for 1432:talk 1385:talk 1354:talk 1330:talk 1315:talk 1274:BLPN 1272:and 1270:OTRS 1260:talk 1218:talk 1172:talk 1158:2013 1112:2013 1090:2013 1044:GP-B 972:talk 935:2013 909:help 830:help 740:talk 671:talk 643:talk 612:talk 596:talk 573:talk 558:talk 531:talk 515:care 482:talk 471:talk 446:talk 427:talk 404:talk 370:talk 335:talk 292:talk 200:and 48:keep 38:Keep 1405:not 881:doi 802:doi 790:449 512:: " 284:. 79:BLP 1773:: 1761:) 1672:) 1608:}} 1602:{{ 1579:) 1564:) 1549:) 1534:) 1519:) 1504:) 1489:) 1464:) 1434:) 1411:. 1387:) 1356:) 1332:) 1317:) 1262:) 1228:/ 1224:/ 1220:/ 1174:) 1141:^ 982:/ 978:/ 974:/ 925:. 897:: 895:}} 891:{{ 879:. 871:. 859:55 857:. 818:: 816:}} 812:{{ 800:. 788:. 742:) 719:, 715:- 708:, 704:- 701:): 673:) 645:) 614:) 598:) 575:) 560:) 533:) 504:(" 473:) 448:) 429:) 406:) 372:) 337:) 276:, 154:: 1757:( 1668:( 1575:( 1560:( 1545:( 1530:( 1515:( 1500:( 1485:( 1460:( 1430:( 1413:§ 1383:( 1352:( 1328:( 1313:( 1282:§ 1258:( 1241:§ 1232:} 1216:{ 1190:§ 1170:( 1160:. 1135:. 1129:: 1114:. 1092:. 999:§ 986:} 970:{ 952:§ 937:. 911:) 907:( 887:. 883:: 875:: 865:: 832:) 828:( 808:. 804:: 796:: 771:. 765:: 738:( 726:- 697:( 669:( 641:( 610:( 594:( 571:( 556:( 529:( 469:( 444:( 425:( 402:( 368:( 333:( 304:) 295:· 290:( 244:. 208:. 134:: 102:. 77:( 54:. 44:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index