Talk:Islamic State/Archive 6

3091:: "Because the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body, editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material...Complex, current, or controversial subjects may require many citations; others, few or none. The presence of citations in the introduction is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article." Some references in the lead certainly are appropriate, but I think right now we have erred on the side of too many. For example, the sentence that references which nations have designated it as a terrorist organization has 12 references! We have an entire section in the article about this that is well referenced, I don't think 12 references are required in the lead just for that. I also don't see a need for 3 different references for "Islamic State" when there is also a footnote about the name. Surely 1 reference along with the footnote would be more than enough for that. 1847:

such activities to their religion, Islam, in order to move their religion into a better light. I find it preposterous to the maximum if someone tries deny ISIS's ties to Islam. This is comparable to implying that the Christian Crusades were not in any way related to Christianity. What the few inherently biased Muslims journalists say about this is irrelevant, especially considering the amazingly low outcry in the Muslim world against the violence of ISIS and other islamic terrorist groups. Compare this outcry for once to the outcry in the Muslim world that could be seen in the past in regards to anything related to Israel, which itself has been a very frequent victim of Islamist terror attacks killing hundreds of civilians. Also your source is heavily biased and uninformative.

2875:, I looked into this today and your edit is technically not in violation of WP policy, though I would have to look at Technophant's further WP wording on this more carefully. Was uncomfortable about Cameron's quoted words being mixed in with Fox News' quoted words in the same sentence, but I had thought of this: '"Fox News reported that in the aftermath of the "Islamic State's butchery", the UK had raised its terror level to "severe" and committed to fight radical Islam "at home and abroad".' That would cover it, I think, but I see Technophant has already changed it. I certainly don't want to edit-war either. -- 31: 378:. It isn't a way around anything, it's the way we work. "An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert." And it is very tricky on a busy article, especially with 1RR in place. Any editor doing this should after they finish check the article history to see if there were intervening edits and if there were, revert back far enough so they don't have a 2nd revert. 3108: 1617: 3699:"The agency directed around three billion dollars to the Afghan mujahideen during the war against the Soviets, but there is no evidence that any of that money went to the Afghan Arabs, nor is there any evidence of CIA personnel meeting with bin Laden or anyone in his circle...The theory that bin Laden was created by the CIA is invariably advanced as an axiom with no supporting evidence". 2364:. It seems that the article has not been read thoroughly by the editor of this information. This is greatly based on suspicions, and no country has openly declared itself an "ally" of the IS. In any case any country where the IS has received help from, be it resources or fighters, directly or indirectly, would be listed as "allies" and that would be ridiculous. ~~Taikun20~~ 3164: 3641:

article as a general reader would, and so see the fuzzy areas clearly! It's why I've been picking your brains on so many points, as you are clearly very knowledgeable about these groups in the Middle East generally - all in the interests of making the article clearer for the uniformed Knowledge reader. --

3681:

I changed "suggested" to "alleged", but I'd take out the whole paragraph, as unnamed "western sources"-this is clear disinfo and a smear campaign-it has been established that in fact the west originally colluded with these folks, (just like Osama, Saddam, Noriega...) it's a smear-the-other-guy tactic

2982:

Sorry. That was always my impression and I had done a quick check on the internet before I made that post and it seemed to confirm it. Not that I think its political leanings would influence its reporting on the Iraq crisis, it is a solid RS. I may have been misled - as people always say, you can't

1301:

It's a mystery why Knowledge is so queasy about using "Jihadist". It's a neutral and accurate term, commonly used by the press, one they use themselves, and appropriate in certain contexts to disambiguate from other Muslim-country militants who are not Jihadists (such as the FSA). It must stem from a

110:

How about in addition to being an "Islamic Caliphate" that you could possible add in the bottom "Totalitarian dictatorship". Considering in the areas where the group controls, they have imposed too much totalitarian-style rules. Maybe it would really shape up, plus a lot of the Caliphates in the past

3358:

I would call it propaganda but it is basically an empty truism that politicians make. She's basically saying the failure of alternatives left a vacuum for ISIL. It just isn't substantial or worthy of an encyclopedia. She could obviously say something more informative with her knowledge and access to

3034:

Um, that was a quote from one editor unhappy with an opinion piece. At least one other editor disputed that. Any conservative or right winger is going to see a liberal paper as biased, that seems obvious. It's normally considered an RS and is certainly better than Fox, the Daily Mail, and many other

2927:

Please stop your accusations. The record clearly shows that I have addressed other editors' reasoning, volunteered my well sourced and well researched knowledge, and, faced with opposition and your unilateral revert of my contribution (that was not in violation of policy), shown flexibility to avoid

2810:

That would change my quoting Fox News to your quoting the PM, which is fine but my quote is not a violation of policy, is it? More importantly, isn't a FACT that the Islamic state are butchering people? Still, if you want to seek legitimate consensus and change the article, I am fine with that. BUT

1827:

I believe we need to add a section on the controversy revolving the "Islamic" nature of ISIS. On the one hand, many leading muslims/islam experts say that the actions of ISIS contradict Islam. On the other hand, there are indications that some or many ISIS members do not have a good understanding of

1715:

I have gone through the history section and rearranged it somewhat. Specifically I have moved sections 9.3.2, 9.3.3 and 9.3.4 up to 9.2. This was because they largely cover events from 2004 to 2006, which is before the Islamic State of Iraq existed and when the group was using the name Tanzim Qaidat

1694:

This is a pretty big gain for them. The battle for this airbase has been raging a long time...and they've captured helicopters before (a black hawk variant I think if my memory serves me correctly), and it is generally believed they don't have the ability to use them. This should be in the article I

596:

The 12 June 2014 WSJ report (footnote in text) says at least 4,000 in Iraq but nothing for Syria. The 19 August Al Jazeera report says IS claims to have 50,000 in Syria and 30,000 in Iraq. The previous infobox figures were much lower and I think the citation then was the BBC, but one would have to

465:

used alongside the older name "Mesopotamia" for Iraq. When you use modern "Iraq", use the modern term "Greater Syria" — in that case, it's the Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria (still ISIS).' This should be fixed in the article so that we are not citing the Washington Post to say the opposite.

3640:

Tanzim" and then read in the names section that ISIS began as Jamat, which became Tanzim. I noticed that 1999 change, but can't do anything about this as I know nothing about the group's background and history beyond what is in this article. My ignorance is probably quite useful, as I can read the

2788:

says "British Prime Minister David Cameron vowed to confront radical Islam "at home and abroad" and the United Kingdom raised its terror level to "severe" in the wake of new revelations about Islamic State's butchery in Syria and Iraq." The article has been misquoted from the start. I don't support

2624:

a major mainstream network news medium and is given equal weight as the other networks as a reliable source. If they do report something it increases the notability of the subject since the network is broadcast worldwide. We should not blatantly diminish a reliable source due to perceived biases. I

2319:

that "ISIS is a terrorist organization that carry the project of destroying the popular revolution sweeping Iraq, and we will stand against it with all our power”. On the other hand, the Ba'athist "statement" quoted by the article praises ISIS for "fighting with us today for the liberation of the

1861:

My suggestion is not to "deny" that ISIS is Islamic though, it's about including in a separate section a criticism on ISIS, a criticism which is widespread and recurring amongst commentators. It's not about "biased Muslim journalists", I would say that this view is equally spread amongst non-muslim

1527:

suggests that it's a group of people who have some structure and a common goal. I'm not an expert on this matter, just someone who follows current events and saw this discussion, but if I'm not mistaken ISIL has some basic leadership structure and then there's the caliphate and associated religious

580:

We need to keep sources updated. The lead says "ISIS has at least 50,0000 fighters in its ranks in Syria and 4,000 in Iraq" sourced to a 2 June 2014 newspaper report. The infobox contradicts with saying 30,000 in Iraq - although the source is more recent we should probably point out that the 30,000

464:

this link is used a couple times but is misquoted and miscited. This is what the article ultimately declares, which is against the ISIL naming: 'If we concede again that "al-Sham" means not only Syria, then there is a name for that: Greater Syria. When we use the older term "Levant", that should be

440:

Not true. "If we concede again that "al-Sham" means not only Syria, then there is a name for that: Greater Syria. When we use the older term "Levant", that should be used alongside the older name "Mesopotamia" for Iraq. When you use modern "Iraq", use the modern term "Greater Syria" — in that case,

3505:

Someone has red-linked said to be the IS's next victim. How justifiable is this? Should every IS victim be named and have a separate Knowledge article devoted to them as has been happening? It seems to me disproportionate, although of course it is of absolutely major importance to the families

3254:

There is guidance in WP on this somewhere. WP has to be NPOV in stating facts, but it is perfectly entitled, if not obliged, to record varying points of view on an article's topic. I therefore think it should stay, but indicating that her words represent only one point of view. That paragraph on

1846:

There is always people who do not want to accept that someone of their faith is committing atrocities, crimes or anything else that is unethical. This is especially true when the perpetrators justify their actions with their faith. Muslim believers are of course motivated to deny the connection of

2737:

says "Where a quotation presents rhetorical language in place of more neutral, dispassionate tone preferred for encyclopedias, it can be a backdoor method of inserting a non-neutral treatment of a controversial subject into Knowledge's narrative on the subject, and should be avoided." which is in

1426:

in the sentence "Muslim intellectuals have condemned this state". Also, what qualifies one as a "Muslim intellectual"? The whole sentence seems unnecessary and weasel-wordy. Like something that would be suggested by a Muslim user opposed to the state who wants Knowledge to suggest everyone agrees

1128:

No source denies that the Islamic State considers itself a caliphate.. If they say its a "caliphate", set it up as such (i.e. a monarchy), and declare their leader a "caliph", what source can we use to say "no, this state isn't a caliphate". The title is very pretentious, of course, implying both

3329:

I see now that this is referring to her statement in the Analysis section and I'm striking out my statement above about including opinions from both political parties. As the former Secretary of State, she's qualified to give this opinion. This opinion adds to the analysis section and I think we

3142:

Before reading this, I was going to suggest removing those designation as terrorist organization footnotes as they are all in section 13. I have already used my 1RR allowance but can do this tomorrow, if others agree. I could also remove the "Western and Middle Eastern" footnotes as they are in

351:

This is good but I have question: Where exactly in WP rules does it say "Several reverts in a row, with no intervening edits by other editors, counts as one revert for the purposes of 1RR"? If WP rules actually allow this, then this would be one permitted way to "go around" the 1RR restriction.

797:

I couldn't do it. It has to be done manually. An admin should probably protect the article completely (edits must be accepted by established users) and should be able to clean up the mess to save the article. I just noticed that I already used my 1RR to fix the Arabic transliteration that was

480:

No, Al Sham in Arabic means either Damascus (Syria's Capital) or the Levant. The name "الدولة الإسلامية في العراق والشام‎" always meant the Levant, never Damascus nor Syria, and it's correct translation was "the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant" aka ISIL. ISIS was incorrectly used and will

2522:

in justification of my logical argument. What I find amusing is that I make one entry once in a while, and, ¡Dios mío bendito!, of all the millions of articles on Knowledge, and the thousands of entries in this and the other Syrian War articles, you and your "email pals" seem to "appear" to

1971:). In this article, we try to agree on important and/or large changes (and sometimes on important small changed) after a well discussed consensus... This way we make sure to discuss the cons and pros. I have changed positions at times based on logical arguments presented by other editors. 826:

OK, done. I had to take a calculated risk and it worked. I also set a precedent for clean up, when needed, under extraordinary circumstances that admins may want to remember and hope to never use. It was a little tedious but the article is now saved, and we are now back to the time before

2493:

The words "Islamic State's butchery" are not Cameron's but Fox News', and they do not appear as a quote from Cameron in the second citation either. That quote is misleadingly and inaccurately attributed to Cameron/UK, so to recitfy this the quote marks would have to be removed. Would the

2278:. I suppose that the rather obscure citation in the infobox may refer to a Ba'ath minority, and should be deleted. And should Ba'ath Party Loyalists conversely appear among "Allies"? And is this alliance significant enough that it should be addressed in a separate paragraph or section? 418:

ISIS remains in currency even as "Islamic State" has been declared to be the official name. As an acronym ISIS is inappropriate for the reason that it mixes translated and untranslated words. That is, The Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shaam. "the Levant" is how we've translated "al-Shaam."

921:

in August 2014 for the Russian news agency Rossiya Segodnya, up to 15% of French people said that they have a positive attitude toward the Islamic State. The share of IS supporters is the largest among people aged between 18 and 24 (27%), and it is the smallest among those aged over 45."

1648:

I am requesting an update to the 'Equipment section.' On 24th August, the islamic state had captured a syrian air base, and along with it, 12 squadrons of Mig-21 fighter jets and 20 Mi-8 helicopters. They may not have the means to deploy those jets and helicopters but worth mentioning?

3382:, but it displays several flags, some of which I don't have a clue about which do they belong. I recognize the Kurds, the Turkmens and the Iraqi flags, but others I have no idea. Someone could help about this, and update the map? (if it's considered to be a reliable source, of course) 1194:

Paradoxically, you could argue that Knowledge calling this a Caliphate is both POV and NPOV: POV because it looks as if Knowledge is taking sides in the argument, where so many dispute its legitimacy, and NPOV because it is only recording what the IS call themselves now, i.e. a fact.

1048:

Folks, this is an article about a state, an unrecognized state. They can call themselves Grand Imperium of the Known Universe we'd still have to use that term. Besides, there is no official "Caliphate Recognition Committee" that might at some point authorize someone to use that term.

3588:

says that ISIS is the successor to Tanzim Qaidat al-Jihad fi Bilad al-Rafidayn, but in "Name and name changes", ISIS is described as originating as Jamāʻat al-Tawḥīd wa-al-Jihād. Should Jamāʻat al-Tawḥīd wa-al-Jihād not be mentioned in the Lead as well, for the avoidance of doubt?

1556:. This didn't happen on the 14th as the edit said it did but on the 9th according to the Newsweek article (the Saturday before the 12th. Or maybe the 12th or 13th (the Independent's story seems confused about the date). Or this is ongoing, the London Evening Standard says yesterday. 581:

is simply a claim by IS. A bit puzzling that the recent sources states there's been a growth in the Syrian figures, but the June and current figures are the same. That doesn't matter if we fix the reference in the lead, but we do need to say that the Iraq figures are claimed by IS.

655:

Something strange has gone on today. I have been reverted but there is no record of it on the "View History" pages. I have lost some other edits as have quite a few others, with seemingly no record of reverts. I have reported the problem to the Village Pump Technical Help Desk.

1792:"Dar al-Ifta wants western journalists to refer to the group as QSIS in order to emphasise to non-Muslims that the group's extremist ideology and depravity does not represent Islam's vast majority." May this information be added to the Name and name changes section of the article? 3016:

shows that "The Guardian is a "use with caution" source in my book. It is very biased in its international and political reporting and I have often noticed erroneous facts and figures, often skewed to reflect their bias." and that it is more considered liberal than left-wing.

3072:

Good constructive criticism worth consideration. For us involved editors, it does not bother us, but for a "fresh eye" reading an encyclopedia, I can understand how it may be hard to read. I don't believe there is a quick solution, but it definitely should be brainstormed.

422:

Of course, The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant has also been deprecated, although again ISIL remains used by some like the US. AFAIK the group never called itself The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, and that is a confusion of ISIS not being an acronym in one language.

2450:

I changed the "MiszaBot/config| algo=old" to from default 30 days to 48 days a while back to keep older discussions alive. This page gets up to 1.6M pageviews/day (!) and discussion has been lively. I think it should be set back to 30 days, or even as low as 21 days.

3255:

her stuck in there starkly on its own with no preamble is obviously not the way to do it. As for Jessica Lewis' views, the way they are presented does not suggest that WP thinks she is right, surely? If it does, some wording will have to be added there as well. --

1528:

structure. State isn't appropriate because I don't think they've made any motion to perform the functions of a state (bureaucracy, provision of government-like services) except perhaps a rudimentary "justice" system (but many rebel groups carry out "justice").

3701:), and your personal conspiracy theories on unrelated issues are not a valid reason to delete reliably sourced material. It is well-known that much of the Islamic State's funding comes from oil sales to the Syrian regime (that's not even "alleged"). Assad 1575:

It probably isn't noteworthy enough to go into the timeline. I know the timeline has developed into a blow-by-blow account, but one has to draw the line somewhere. If this leafleting was happening everywhere in the West, then it might be worth adding.

1322:

Jihadism isn't a nice ideology, but its a legitimate ideology.. I don't see why it should be viewed as loaded. "Terrorist" is, however, unspecific and known to be a loaded term. I'm not at all sure the leaders of this entity would reject such a term..

1166:

The title is similar to the original meaning of the terms "emperor" and "empire".. which also later became used much more freely, originally indicating a universal secular and religious ruler, and universal state. Yet, as I pointed out, we also have

1018:

I have tried to change that infobox back to Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant more than once, only to be reverted both times. There have been similar attempts by others to remove POV in the al-Baghdadi page, but they, too, are always reverted.

111:

were a lot less controlling and even gave non-Muslims civil liberties. So I think it would be best to rename the Government type from "Islamic Caliphate" to "Totalitarian dictatorship", "Islamic totalitarianism", "Islamic Socialist state", etc.

2629:. People may have an issue with what stories they choose to report on, or what aspects of those stories they choose to emphasize, but that in no way reflects on the reliability or accuracy of the facts they report. Finally, everyone should read 2587:

I agree that we should be very chary about using Fox. Quotes should be attributed, but we should be even more chary about quoting Fox. Comments such as Worldedixor's on other editors can poison the atmosphere for editing and need to be avoided.

2550:(Conservative Republicans, not AQ). They often view things in black and white, like all jihadis are terrorists, therefore always bad and members of US military is always good (even though in Afghanistan JSOC special forces have earned the name 615:

I have adusted the Lead to reflect the fact that 50,000 and 30,000 are IS's figures. I have also reordered the paras in the Lead, but am not very happy with what I have done. Can someone think of a better way to order them or join them up?

2218:

This name is repeatedly being changed to "al-Qaeda in Iraq" in the Lead. Please note that the spelling adopted throughout the article is "Al-Qaeda in Iraq" and that the spelling Knowledge adopts for al-Qaeda is "al-Qaeda", not "Al-Qaeda".

2554:

due to their brutality and execution of unarmed civilians). So while specific information, if not in conflict with other reliable sources can be used in articles, their special brand of rhetoric often will not meet our NPOV standards.

2761:

expressly as "Islamic State's butchery". Having said that, if their is a "real" consensus (as consensus is clearly defined in policy, which has nothing to do with numbers), then the entry should be changed following logical consensus.

2527:

my lonesome, well sourced entry. Ah well... Since I have no time nor energy for edit-wars, I do what I can, but after I see your relentless "opposition", I just let it be and almost never revert twice your reverts. No big deal. :)

3055:... and very informative. Would it be possible to remove the refs from the lede? Too many refs there makes it really hard to read, and in any case I am sure all the refs are already somewhere in the body of the article. Thanks! - 768:

I saw it. That was intentionally or unintentionally disruptive. Only 2-3 minor edits have been made after its revert, so it is critical to revert now. I will do it as it is a critical, time-sensitive and justified exception.

2488:

British Prime Minister David Cameron vowed to confront radical Islam "at home and abroad" and the United Kingdom raised its terror level to "severe" in the wake of new revelations about Islamic State's butchery in Syria and

1862:

commentators, at least so in Western Europe. It's not hard to find US commentators either... or critics in the Muslim world itself. Not sure why you think we would need widespread protests against ISIS for such an inclusion.

167:

This happened accidentally when I reverted earlier; I have put it back in now. (NB ref to "other media sources worldwide" has been moved by another editor to the end of the article. Don't agree, but have had my 1RR today.)

1033:

They WANT to establish a caliphate, but have not and will not achieve it. They are just an armed group "on the move" without any central government - until the Sources start to refer to this as actual fact, that term should

1431:"Muslim intellectuals" (whatever that term means) will have condemned the state, but that on its own is hardly information for the lead. With sources provided, we can't even claim "most Muslim intellectuals" or "many"... 1735:

There are a number of human rights related sections scattered through the article - 9.4.4 Treatment of civilians, 9.5.1 Guidelines for civilians, part of the lead. I've combined them into one section, similar to the

1559:

That's quite likely so we can't assign it to a date. I'm not sure it's even worth adding to the article. A few ignorant people passing out leaflets? It did pick up a lot of Engliah language media coverage though.

1129:

religious and secular rule over all Muslims worldwide. This entity can only be viewed as not being a "caliphate" in the sense that it doesn't actually exercise such authority, but this is also true of almost

1250:

Basically the entire world's news services refers to them as terrorists now, with all the massacres and the beheading of American journalist Foley. That ship has sailed. Why? Because that's what they are.

3655:

Gazkthul has some good points. The article are contradicts itself about this, and this needs to be viewed and discussed by a wider audience. I think this discussion should be moved the ISIL talk page.~

1385:

Knowledge can not claim all "Muslim intellectuals" in the world are unanimous on this. And we of course can not use the word "slammed", this isn't Fox News.. The claim must be qualified and moderated.

1053:

proclaimed himself "Emperor"... Even if they're an organization, if they choose to call their leader "Grand Poobah" we have to refer to him as the "Grand Poobah of the Imperium of the Known Universe".

1495:

It probably should be an unrecognized state but there is no consensus as of yet. The article from inception refers to them as a group. So, once consensus in the discussion is reached, we will know.

2315:

Please note the source for the "opponent" category: Shaafaq News. And that article includes the sentence "The dissolved party said in a statement published by pro-sites in which “Shafaq News”

1302:

misunderstanding of the word, a populist view that "Jihadist" is a pejorative slang description (like "Christinite" or something). Every time I try to use it, it quickly gets removed. Crazy. --

462: 438: 3604:

I'm of two minds, ultimately Tawhid wal Jihad did come first, but it was very different to what the Islamic State is, I think that being in the Names and History sections might be sufficient.

441:

it's the Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria (still ISIS)." No one in the Middle East uses Levant. That was a colonial name and doesn't mean the same thing. Syria is the only proper term.

3269:

Hillary is considered the de facto democratic candidate for the 2016 presidential race and likely to be the next president. On the other side of the isle, Ted Cruz has been the one making

1557: 321:

Attaching a "citation needed" tag is not normally a revert. Removing a tag and/or the text that it is appended to is normally a revert. Replacing a tag with a citation is not a revert.

3445:

As it is currently, the human rights abuses section is notably incomplete. The list of abuses this group has committed is vast; I'd say it could constitute an article of its own, even.

2893:

If this is not a violation of policy, what's stopping me (or anyone) from soliciting other editors (or admins) to roll in and influence the editorial process in a topic or discussion?

2857:

news media. Still, at this juncture, legitimate consensus is what counts, but I can see you have already changed it, so I'll just let it be, and won't revert it to avoid an edit war.

2932:. This is why I am not assuming anything nor accusing anyone, and I have made no subpoenas. I am asking a reasonable question, and since you both are responding, I ask for a 1680:

It seems that most of the operable planes and helicopters were evacuated before the fall of the base, judging from the photos Islamic State have started releasing from Taqba.

733:

including the number of fighters. I am handling one part of its revert on its talk page. I leave it to you to handle the number of fighters since you have been on top of it.

2755:

You're right!... There is no POV here. Isn't a FACT that the Islamic state are butchering people? Also, this article and other world media articles, (this is another example

2616:

I completely disagree with Dougweller. It's more like comments such as Dougweller's and his pals on Worldedixor can poison the atmosphere for editing and need to be avoided.

220:

Editors go to extreme lengths to find the right language for the article following long discussions. 1RR per 24 hours should not be used to revert well discussed entries.

1080:. If they consider themselves a Caliphate then that's what we report. There is no authority. Throughout history most states are self-proclaimed and often violently. -- 3484:

It seems like there's an editing consensus to refer to the group, on wiki, as Islamic State (ISIS) but no consensus to change the article name, am I right with that?~

512:

Depending on whether MSA or Classical Arabic is used, there are more than one transliteration, none of them is "ad-Dawlat al-ʾIslāmiyyah" which is what we have now:

641:. Who changed the lead back to 4,000 in Iraq and nothing in Syria? Nothing in Syria? That is incorrect. Its thousands of fighters control roughly a third of Syria. 263:

I suggest every time an edit is made by consensus, it should be clearly recorded in the relevant discussion on the Talk page. That way there can be no argument. --

751: 3702: 2287: 3401: 3698: 2602:`The UK raised its terror level to "severe" and committed to fight radical Islam "at home and abroad".' That is unbiased. Would that be that acceptable? -- 2070:

Is there a way to change the metadata or something for this page so that it shows up when you search "ISIS" on google? Currently only ISIL will get you here.

2181: 521:

3. ad-Dawlatou l-ʾIslāmiyyah, الدَوْلَةُ الإِسْلَامِيَّة (marfou3ah) which would be the most correct way of transliterating it if Classical Arabic is used.

3562: 3461: 3301:

Wow. Anyway, P123ct1, we wouldn't say it's only one point of view because that's obvious. Ssomething like that might be seen as deprecating her statement.

2250:

I think the changes are made by "visiting" editors and wanted to suggest editors change it when it happens, but obviously I can't ask them to do that. --

1551: 3620:

ISIS is the successor to Tanzim Qaidat al-Jihad fi Bilad al-Rafidayn—more commonly known as Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI)—formed by Abu Musab Al Zarqawi in 1999

3460:

If this section eventually becomes too big for the article, it could be split off into a separate article. There is already a Knowledge article on the

2476:

The UK raised its terror level to "severe" in the aftermath of the "Islamic State's butchery" and committed to fight radical Islam "at home and abroad".

1366: 1114:

Do we care then what they are called by reliable sources? I don't see how we can just ignore sources and choose what the organisation wants us to use.

2889:

Not just technically, it was simply not in violation. I still have a reasonable question. Please can you clarify, as per policy, as to whether or not

2811:

first, please can you clarify, as per policy, as to whether or not you and P123ct1 have ever had email interaction in relation to this article or me?

1885: 3270: 2320:

entire territory of Iraq". And the accompanying photograph is unidentified. So this citation appears to me to fail to meet Knowledge's standards.

3087:

There are an awful lot of references in the lead section. Some of them that are referenced elsewhere in the article could probably be removed. Per

1554: 515:

1. ad-Dawlah l-ʾIslāmiyyah, الدولة الإسلامية which would be the most correct way of transliterating it if MSA is used, and which is what WP uses.

2756: 2520: 3088: 1357:

I would like to add this sentence to this article: Muslim intellectuals have slammed the ISIS/ISIL as anti-Islamic, using these as references:

249:

I'd say it's a bad idea to revert edits that have consensus - easier to determine if something has consensus than what "well discussed" means.

3622:

that is totally wrong. Qaeda in Iraq was formed in 2004, Tawhid wal Jihad was formed in 1999, so it's the worst of both worlds at the moment!

2938:

Please can you clarify, as per policy, as to whether or not you and P123ct1 have ever had email interaction in relation to this article or me?

118: 2911:, and keep in mind that in almost all cases it is better to address other editors' reasoning than it is to accuse them of being on a team. ~ 3446: 2785: 2481: 1627: 932: 2273: 2334:

Good point. Who is the spokesperson for a dissolved politic party? Nobody. It's just a random bunch of opinions without organization. ~

688:

If you undo an edit at the same time that someone else also undoes the same edit, only one of you will be shown in the revision history.

3239: 2189: 2104: 466: 442: 1829: 1523:

I think "organization" is a better term. Group is slightly ambiguous, as they could just be a group of peoples (like an ethnic group).

1362: 309:

Correcting grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes does not count as a revert, provided that the meaning of the text is not altered.

3710: 2953:

I'm sure if you think about it you'll realise that article talk pages are not the appropriate place to discuss email between editors.

2571:

I am sure the misattribution effect of Worldedixor's edit was unintentional, btw. I should have made that clear when I raised this. --

2141: 1695:

think (but I can't and won't make any big edits on the awful airport wifi I am connected to now! Someone will hopefully add it soon).

999:

Calling it an Islamic Caliphate in the infobox is pov - this is clearly disputed within Islam. And why does it use Ibrahim instead of

424: 3767: 3273:

saying "They want to go back and reject modernity. Well, I think we should help them. We ought to bomb them back to the Stone Age."

2907:

Knowledge encourages and depends on cooperative editing to improve articles, and most editors who work together are not a tag team.

1789: 2276: 1408:

I don't think he was claiming "all" Muslim intellectuals, obviously. Anyway, "condemned" would be a better word than "slammed".

1358: 3526: 3315:

I didn't mean necessarily using those words. I am sure diplomatic wording could be devised to indicate/get the idea across. --

3722: 3706: 2380: 2100: 3782:

The report talks about the group announcing an "Islamic state". It seems to have no connection with the Islamic State. --

1235:

and are best avoided unless widely used by reliable sources to describe the subject, in which case use in-text attribution.

1919:

I object very strongly to this unilateral action taken by a new editor without proper discussion on the Talk page first. --

3527:

Knowledge:Village pump (policy)#Have a clearly defined policy in regards to Hostages and their notability or lack there of

97: 1905:

I went and did it myself. It's not premature, it's actually quite late, but if you wish to change the title, be my guest.

3506:

involved and any normal person will have sympathy. But Knowledge is an encyclopaedia, not a book of remembrance or the

2420: 854: 832: 727: 152:

Who reverted it and why did it completely remove the "express" and "very well sourced" reference by the United Nations?

89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 2272:

Among the "Opponents" in the infobox, Ba'ath Party Loyalists appear. This needs to be reconciled with the later-cited

3143:

section 13 as well. That would cut down the footnotes in the Lead by by 11. Needless to say, the first UN footnote

2627:

have yet to be shown any evidence of stories Fox News published that were factually incorrect, or had to be retracted

917:

The content below has been reverted while it is perfectly sourced : "According to the results of a poll conducted by

639: 1367:

http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/isis-action-is-worse-than-genocide-muslim-intellectuals/article6333688.ece

1264:"Terrorist" is a loaded term, not for encyclopedic use. As for "jihadist", don't they call themselves such anyway? 1077: 38: 3221:

I understand that it is hard to be super partes on this topic, but please explain why did you pick those sources.

3732: 3718: 3687: 3380: 1935:

I've been here since the middle of the last decade, aside from possibly the title, what would you do differently?

1655: 987: 122: 3013: 3801: 3796:@99.238.82.6 You're misunderstanding. There is a difference between a "Islamic state" and "the Islamic State". 3450: 3364: 2829:, yes quoting the PM not Fox. Members of IS are not kill people then "dress their flesh, sell their meat" as a 2511:

What you don't seem to understand is that I never attributed those quotes to Cameron, I simply quoted what the

2039: 1459: 1413: 1310: 1232: 1088: 2113:

That's part of the arguement as to why ISIL is a better acronym, it's (almost) unique. The only other ISIL is

936: 3243: 2117:. Can Knowledge do something to change it's page rank, besides page renaming and redirects? Good question. 3218:

I don't think it should be there, as the opinion on what US is from Al-Baghdadi is not on the US wiki page.

1623: 1255: 1039: 947:

Discussed in the section above headed "Rfc: Russian TV as a reliable source". Not at all perfectly sourced.

850: 828: 752:

Knowledge:Village_pump_(technical)/Archive 129#Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS)—technical problem

723: 470: 446: 428: 3771: 2090: 2075: 1893: 1812: 1797: 1670: 1755:

None at all. I would have done it myself, but couldn't think of an appropriate title for the section. --

1375: 3740: 3661: 3490: 3428: 3410: 3387: 3340: 3283: 3275:

For neutrality, the argument the current statements from the leaders of both parties should be included.

3200: 3119: 3078: 3023: 2944: 2917: 2898: 2862: 2839: 2816: 2799: 2767: 2744: 2702: 2638: 2561: 2533: 2457: 2432: 2406: 2376: 2340: 2240: 2158: 2125: 2053: 2020: 1976: 1852: 1700: 1500: 862: 840: 803: 774: 738: 646: 550: 531: 490: 397: 357: 225: 187: 157: 1666: 2546:

reliable source. They are very harsh toward the Democratic Party (esp. Obama) and very soft regarding

2400:

with edit summary "(Rm countries as allies, not enough evidence for this. no official announcement." ~

1848: 3763: 3683: 3569: 3534: 3306: 3235: 3096: 3040: 2966: 2734: 2593: 2368: 2152:

regarding why WP is so high in Google's page ranking (ie. WP sucks less than the rest of the web). ~

2031: 1867: 1836: 1595: 1565: 1514: 1485: 1481: 1240: 1236: 1119: 1105: 1101: 1008: 1000: 983: 972: 968: 952: 928: 788: 586: 383: 254: 114: 2149: 1363:

http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report-muslim-and-christian-groups-condemn-isis-as-anti-islam-2012168

303: 3797: 3360: 2961:

The Guardian is not considered pretty left-wing. It's liberal, that's for sure, but not left-wing.

2393: 2372: 2325: 2302: 2283: 2197: 2035: 1774: 1480:

Outsiders call them a group but IS call themselves a State. Which one should be used in the intro?

1455: 1409: 1303: 1081: 812:

I agree that this needs to be fixed straight away and it will probably need expert outside help. --

693: 546: 3563:

Knowledge:Village pump (policy)/Archive 115#Guideline for crime victims of world wide significance

524:

4. ad-Dawlatou al-ʾIslāmiyyah, which is another common mistake as it is never pronounced as such.

148: 3627: 3609: 3229: 3128: 2779: 1745: 1721: 1685: 1441: 1395: 1333: 1292: 1274: 1251: 1181: 1134: 1063: 1035: 47: 17: 1769:

Thank you! I wrote most of those sections and thank you for arranging them. This is better now!

298:

Several reverts in a row, with no intervening edits by other editors, counts as one revert, per

1790:

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/27/islamic-state-isis-al-qaida-separatists-iraq-syria

481:

continue to be used because it is a more appealing and clearer sound than ISIL. Nevertheless,

3787: 3682:

and doesn't belong on Knowledge unless the actual US et.al. collusion is given equal weight.--

3646: 3594: 3548: 3515: 3469: 3320: 3260: 3176: 3152: 3061: 2988: 2880: 2688: 2607: 2576: 2499: 2255: 2224: 2137: 2086: 2071: 1954: 1924: 1889: 1808: 1793: 1760: 1581: 1533: 1200: 1138: 1024: 880: 817: 759: 661: 621: 602: 565: 338: 268: 240: 201: 173: 2833:

does! If this is put in then it could be confused that this is actually is what happening. ~

1359:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-muslim-intellectuals-slam-isis-brutality-in-iraq-2012096

3736: 3714: 3656: 3485: 3424: 3420: 3405: 3397: 3383: 3335: 3278: 3195: 3115: 3074: 3018: 2940: 2912: 2894: 2872: 2858: 2834: 2826: 2812: 2794: 2763: 2739: 2730: 2698: 2634: 2556: 2529: 2452: 2427: 2401: 2335: 2235: 2153: 2145: 2120: 2049: 2016: 1972: 1696: 1496: 872: 858: 836: 799: 770: 747: 734: 642: 527: 486: 393: 353: 221: 183: 153: 2267: 1076:

Agreed. Let's not impose our personal biases and treat this Caliphate differently from the

3565: 3530: 3302: 3092: 3036: 2977: 2962: 2630: 2589: 2294: 1996: 1968: 1940: 1910: 1863: 1832: 1591: 1561: 1510: 1115: 1004: 948: 784: 582: 545:

The opponent section lists Hezbollah under Iran, while it should be listed under Lebanon;

518:

2. ad-Dawlah al-ʾIslāmiyyah, which is a common mistake as it is never pronounced as such.

379: 250: 1658: 923: 3215:

What does Hillary Clinton's opinion add to the topic, if not only American propaganda?

2321: 2298: 2279: 2193: 1770: 1371: 689: 325: 2891:

you and Technophant have ever had email interaction in relation to this article or me?

2361: 2293:

They may have started off supporting ISIL, thinking that anything must be better than

3623: 3605: 3225: 2929: 2908: 2551: 2079: 1741: 1717: 1681: 1454:

That's fine, I wasn't really expecting a debate here. I'm more neutral in this case.

1434: 1388: 1326: 1288: 1267: 1228: 1174: 1056: 3379:

I've consulted a source concerning to the capture of the region surrounding Amerli:

3805: 3791: 3783: 3775: 3744: 3726: 3691: 3666: 3650: 3642: 3631: 3613: 3598: 3590: 3573: 3552: 3544: 3538: 3519: 3511: 3495: 3473: 3465: 3454: 3432: 3415: 3391: 3368: 3345: 3324: 3316: 3310: 3288: 3264: 3256: 3247: 3205: 3180: 3172: 3156: 3148: 3137: 3132: 3123: 3100: 3082: 3066: 3056: 3044: 3028: 2992: 2984: 2970: 2956: 2948: 2922: 2902: 2884: 2876: 2866: 2854: 2844: 2820: 2804: 2771: 2749: 2706: 2692: 2684: 2642: 2611: 2603: 2597: 2580: 2572: 2566: 2537: 2512: 2503: 2495: 2462: 2437: 2411: 2384: 2345: 2329: 2306: 2259: 2251: 2245: 2228: 2220: 2201: 2163: 2131: 2108: 2094: 2057: 2043: 2034:

article? Because I see that someone removed "Caliph" from his name in the infobox.

2024: 2000: 1980: 1958: 1950: 1944: 1928: 1920: 1914: 1897: 1871: 1856: 1840: 1816: 1801: 1778: 1764: 1756: 1749: 1725: 1704: 1689: 1674: 1599: 1585: 1577: 1569: 1537: 1529: 1524: 1518: 1504: 1489: 1463: 1449: 1417: 1403: 1379: 1341: 1317: 1296: 1282: 1259: 1244: 1204: 1196: 1189: 1123: 1109: 1095: 1071: 1043: 1028: 1020: 1012: 976: 956: 940: 918: 884: 876: 875:. You went to great lengths to sort out the muddle and it is much appreciated. -- 866: 844: 821: 813: 807: 792: 778: 763: 755: 742: 697: 665: 657: 650: 625: 617: 606: 598: 590: 569: 561: 554: 535: 494: 474: 450: 432: 401: 387: 375: 361: 342: 334: 299: 292: 272: 264: 258: 244: 236: 229: 205: 197: 191: 177: 169: 161: 126: 560:

Unbelievable. Can someone please rectify this immediately? (I can't do flags.) --

3758: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3035:

sources. Ane even the best sources sometimes need to be treated with caution.

2759: 2185: 1992: 1964: 1936: 1906: 1656:

http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2014/08/24/does-islamic-state-now-have-an-air-force/

2268:

Should Ba'ath Party Loyalists really appear among "Opponents" in the infobox?

3753:

Islamic state is now in control of northern NIgeria, someone care to update?

1168: 1050: 750:

Have just had a message from the Village Pump HD and this is what they say.

2928:

an edit war. Also, let me be clear that I am not accusing anyone, and I am

2048:

Yes, this article. The revert had been reverted since I raised the issue.

3441:

Expand the human rights abuses section or split off into its own article?

505:

Who has been changing this back and forth? "ad-Dawlat al-ʾIslāmiyyah" is

3636:

I just thought the general reader would be confused to see "ISIS is the

1509:

We should use "group". Describing them as a "state" would be incorrect.

182:

Super. I will bring it back the way you had it earlier after discussion.

2830: 1737: 1003:

which is what we call the article on him? That appears to be pov also.

315:

Removing text or adding back in text that has been removed is a revert.

3707:

refrained from attacking ISIS with the same ferocity as other groups

3194:

There's still too many refs in the lead. Should only have 5 or so. ~

2851:

butchery also means "the savage killing of large numbers of people".

2849:

I agree with what you said, but butchery has more than one meaning;

2085:

Is it possible your search results are impacted by 'filter bubbles'?

2360:

The info in the "allies" section is based solely on this article:

2099:

It does for me, granted for "ISIS" its only the 4th suggestion.--

1807:

Edit to say, disregard, as it was added already, and I missed it.

3585: 3359:

information. Perhaps we should wait until she is more specific.

2758:), have summed up what the PM had said in his press conference 1611: 25: 2683:, an RS source, but generally considered pretty left-wing. -- 1716:

al-Jihad fi Bilad al-Rafidayn. Happy to discuss the changes.

302:. (See Dougweller's comment below and #1RR restriction redux 857:) explained on its talk page that this was not intentional. 3543:

Thanks for the link. It is very useful in this context. --

2789:

quoting this article. It should be summarized. I made this

2114: 1991:

want to split the Timeline 2014 section into a new article?

2515:

Fox News and what the media worldwide are calling as the "

2180:

There is another ISIL that I have heard of before, namely

1352:

Muslim intellectuals have actually condemned the ISIS/ISIL

1133:

historical "caliphates", only excepting perhaps the early

2618:

Admins are expected to observe a high standard of conduct

3757:

Boko Haram declares 'Islamic state' in northern Nigeria

2234:

Yes. This was decided by consensus earlier this year. ~

722:

I don't think it's a software issue. This is the editor

2790: 2397: 2297:. But they discovered that they were wrong about that. 731: 216:

1RR should not be used to revert well discussed entries

3131:

might be useful in the context of the above comments.

3375:

Map concerning to the capture of region around Amerli

1590:

And we can't maintain a daily timeline indefinitely.

2011:

Revert of "Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi named as its caliph"

1659:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-28918792

924:

15% of French people back ISIS militants, poll finds

3705:jailed Islamist radicals to tar the opposition and 3464:, which should be summarized into this article. -- 1949:

I beg your pardon, I meant new to the ISIS page. --

2362:http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-29004253 1100:Agree with GreenC but not about the violent part. 312:Correcting a footnote does not count as a revert. 3089:Knowledge:Manual_of_Style/Lead_section#Citations 2426:will fill the entire side of the article! lol ~ 1828:Islam, or don't practice their faith regularly: 995:Islamic caliphate in infox stated as fact is pov 783:Unintentional but do whatever needs to be done. 2738:agreement with the consensus of this thread. ~ 139:"and has been referred to as a terrorist group 137:This (well discussed) entry has been reverted: 2983:trust everything you read on the internet. -- 871:Thanks for getting us out of a fix yesterday, 3759:http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-28925484 3618:Actually i've just noticed it says currently 3402:File talk:Territorial control of the ISIS.svg 2519:" of the Islamic State atrocities. Read this 2148:that could help. There's an interesting post 1608:Semi-protected edit request on 24 August 2014 318:Removing vandalism does not count as a revert 8: 2182:International Society for Individual Liberty 2066:ISIL shows up in google search, ISIS doesn't 133:United Nations Reference to IS as terrorists 3462:Persecution of Yazidis by the Islamic State 2542:Fox News (television more than print) is a 2140:- A question like this could be put to the 414:ISIS / ISIL / the Levant / al-Shaam / Syria 2494:responsible editor see to this, please? -- 2416:All we have to do is wait long enough and 324:Some further guidance on citation tags is 3697:The West did not collude with bin Laden ( 2472:The timeline entry for 29 August reads: 1231:like Jihadist and Terrorist may express 501:Ad-Dawlah l-ʾIslāmiyyah الدولة الإسلامية 2793:that will hopefully end this debate. ~ 2735:Knowledge:Quotations#General_guidelines 2115:The Indian Society of International Law 1223:Word Jihadist and Terrorist in the lead 2396:. I removed the 3 countries as allies 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2633:before they opine. Happy editing!... 1652:I also have two relevant references: 457:The Washington Post Article on Naming 287:Here is some guidance on this: 7: 3561:Note: the intended link is probably 2317:could not make sure if it is correct 1628:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant 2190:Indian Society of International Law 2030:Do you mean in this article or the 291:Self-reverts are penalty-free, per 24: 2184:. It ranks higher on the list at 1740:article. Any concerns with this? 638:50,000 and 30,000 sound accurate 3711:used ISIS to attack other rebels 3232:) 05:14, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 3162: 3106: 2936:answer, if you care to respond: 1884:Please join the main discussion 1615: 754:. Have informed Dougweller. -- 576:Figures for Iraq and Syria redux 29: 2356:Status of countries as "allies" 1880:Proposed split into new article 835:) graced us with its presence. 2679:So maybe a bit like Britain's 2144:section. Perhaps there's some 1550:Found some better sources, eg 730:) who reverted so many things 1: 3806:21:10, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 3792:07:45, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 3776:11:30, 3 September 2014 (UTC) 3745:18:43, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 3727:18:24, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 3692:16:27, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 3667:12:50, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 3651:10:34, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 3632:08:20, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 3614:08:05, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 3599:14:01, 3 September 2014 (UTC) 3580:Jamāʻat al-Tawḥīd wa-al-Jihād 3553:12:40, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 3539:12:31, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 3520:11:51, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 3496:11:15, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 3474:07:11, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 3455:22:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC) 3433:21:21, 3 September 2014 (UTC) 3416:00:20, 3 September 2014 (UTC) 3392:15:34, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 3369:02:17, 3 September 2014 (UTC) 3346:02:12, 3 September 2014 (UTC) 3325:14:47, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 3311:14:26, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 3289:11:53, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 3265:09:59, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 3248:05:12, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 3206:00:14, 3 September 2014 (UTC) 3045:15:30, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 3029:11:48, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 2993:09:24, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 2971:08:37, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 2949:23:58, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2923:23:48, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2903:23:22, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2885:23:11, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2871:I missed all that. Actually, 2867:22:51, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2845:22:35, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2821:22:26, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2805:22:23, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2772:22:08, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2750:21:56, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2707:21:45, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2693:21:44, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2643:16:53, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2612:16:01, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2598:10:24, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2581:06:23, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2567:05:15, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2468:Timeline: entry for 29 August 2463:11:40, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 2438:00:01, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 2412:23:27, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2385:22:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2346:23:15, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2330:16:45, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2307:10:49, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2288:07:42, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2260:06:02, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2246:05:28, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 1785:Addition to name/name changes 147:The reliable sourced used is 143:and media sources worldwide." 3703:released, armed, and trained 3574:05:48, 3 December 2014 (UTC) 967:The article is full of POV. 541:Edit request August 25, 2014 485:now calls itself just that. 3400:I reposted your comment to 3181:18:24, 30 August 2014 (UTC) 3157:19:24, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 3138:17:40, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 3124:17:33, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 3101:17:21, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 3083:16:01, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 3067:15:16, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 2853:Ergo, the worldwide use in 2538:20:10, 31 August 2014 (UTC) 2504:17:49, 31 August 2014 (UTC) 2229:15:49, 31 August 2014 (UTC) 2202:13:36, 31 August 2014 (UTC) 2164:07:01, 31 August 2014 (UTC) 2132:17:53, 30 August 2014 (UTC) 2109:05:48, 30 August 2014 (UTC) 2095:15:28, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 2080:13:41, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 2058:02:55, 31 August 2014 (UTC) 2044:00:04, 31 August 2014 (UTC) 2025:03:34, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 2001:14:15, 30 August 2014 (UTC) 1987:Okay, folks, Who here does 1981:20:29, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 1959:20:09, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 1945:19:30, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 1929:19:17, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 1915:18:06, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 1898:02:45, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 1872:13:18, 30 August 2014 (UTC) 1857:12:00, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 1841:12:30, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 1817:16:26, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 1802:16:06, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 1779:03:24, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 1765:14:23, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 1750:03:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 1726:02:35, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 1705:09:25, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 1690:01:13, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 1675:23:41, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1642:to reactivate your request. 1630:has been answered. Set the 1600:18:40, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 1586:17:12, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 1570:16:20, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 1538:16:52, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 1519:22:02, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1505:17:21, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1490:16:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1464:03:37, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1450:01:37, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1427:with him... Well of course 1418:20:38, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1404:16:58, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1380:15:45, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1342:18:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1318:18:05, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1297:22:58, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1283:16:55, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1260:16:34, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1245:14:47, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1205:16:44, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 1190:16:13, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1124:11:24, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1110:11:10, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1096:18:17, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1072:16:49, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1044:16:39, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1029:10:00, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1013:08:32, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 977:04:43, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 957:09:39, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 941:06:12, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 885:18:39, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 867:21:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 845:21:11, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 822:21:08, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 808:20:52, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 793:20:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 779:20:44, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 764:20:22, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 743:19:37, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 698:21:49, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 666:19:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 651:18:22, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 626:15:33, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 607:10:46, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 591:08:53, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 570:22:43, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 555:14:26, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 536:06:34, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 495:03:52, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 475:02:36, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 451:02:33, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 433:06:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 402:17:19, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 388:16:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 362:15:06, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 343:13:55, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 273:16:39, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 259:16:07, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 245:15:53, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 230:15:47, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 206:15:57, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 192:15:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 178:15:26, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 162:14:42, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 127:19:02, 21 August 2014 (UTC) 106:Also add in Government type 3822: 3171:since no-one responded. -- 2015:Who removed this and why? 1078:Grand Duchy of Flandrensis 3735:. I couldn't agree more. 2101:Prisencolinensinainciusol 235:I couldn't agree more. -- 2784:I think since the quote 2142:Reference Desk/Computing 597:look back for this. -- 304:earlier on the Talk page 2480:The Fox News report in 1287:Agreed on both counts. 3423:Thank you very much! ~ 3224:SECTION 5, Analysis 1711:History 9.2 & 9.3 913:International opinion 849:For full disclosure, 141:by the United Nations 42:of past discussions. 3733:TheTimesAreAChanging 3719:TheTimesAreAChanging 2620:. Also, Fox News is 2032:Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi 1001:Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi 461:I found it odd that 2552:"Americian Taliban" 2421:Infobox war faction 1233:contentious opinion 2446:Talk page too long 1139:Umayyad Caliphates 851:TimIsTimisTimIsTim 829:TimIsTimisTimIsTim 724:TimIsTimisTimIsTim 18:Talk:Islamic State 3766:comment added by 3709:. Assad has even 3665: 3576: 3494: 3414: 3344: 3287: 3238:comment added by 3204: 3027: 2921: 2909:Assume good faith 2843: 2803: 2783: 2748: 2565: 2461: 2436: 2410: 2388: 2371:comment added by 2344: 2244: 2162: 2129: 1646: 1645: 931:comment added by 483:the Islamic State 374:It's policy. See 117:comment added by 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3813: 3778: 3659: 3560: 3488: 3408: 3338: 3281: 3250: 3198: 3170: 3166: 3165: 3135: 3110: 3109: 3064: 3059: 3021: 3012:A check on RS:N 2981: 2960: 2915: 2837: 2797: 2777: 2742: 2731:user:Worldedixor 2559: 2455: 2430: 2425: 2419: 2404: 2387: 2365: 2338: 2238: 2214:Al-Qaeda in Iraq 2156: 2146:Help:Magic Words 2130: 2123: 1823:"Islamic" nature 1637: 1633: 1619: 1618: 1612: 1448: 1447: 1444: 1437: 1402: 1401: 1398: 1391: 1369: 1340: 1339: 1336: 1329: 1315: 1308: 1281: 1280: 1277: 1270: 1188: 1187: 1184: 1177: 1093: 1086: 1070: 1069: 1066: 1059: 943: 129: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3821: 3820: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3812: 3811: 3810: 3761: 3755: 3684:Kintetsubuffalo 3679: 3582: 3503: 3482: 3443: 3377: 3233: 3213: 3211:Hillary Clinton 3163: 3161: 3133: 3107: 3062: 3057: 3053: 2975: 2954: 2470: 2448: 2423: 2417: 2366: 2358: 2295:Nouri al-Maliki 2270: 2216: 2118: 2068: 2065: 2013: 1882: 1825: 1787: 1733: 1713: 1635: 1631: 1616: 1610: 1548: 1478: 1476:Group or State? 1442: 1439: 1435: 1432: 1396: 1393: 1389: 1386: 1356: 1354: 1334: 1331: 1327: 1324: 1311: 1304: 1275: 1272: 1268: 1265: 1225: 1182: 1179: 1175: 1172: 1089: 1082: 1064: 1061: 1057: 1054: 997: 984:Volunteer Marek 965: 926: 915: 578: 543: 503: 459: 416: 285: 283:Reverts and 1RR 218: 135: 119:107.209.161.190 112: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3819: 3817: 3809: 3808: 3798:Supersaiyen312 3794: 3754: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3747: 3678: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3672: 3671: 3670: 3669: 3616: 3581: 3578: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3502: 3499: 3481: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3447:141.134.75.236 3442: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3376: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3361:Jason from nyc 3356: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3212: 3209: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3159: 3052: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2823: 2775: 2774: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2523:"dissect" and 2491: 2490: 2478: 2477: 2469: 2466: 2447: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2357: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2310: 2309: 2269: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2215: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2134: 2067: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2036:Supersaiyen312 2012: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1881: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1824: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1786: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1767: 1732: 1729: 1712: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1692: 1644: 1643: 1620: 1609: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1547: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1507: 1477: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1456:Supersaiyen312 1410:Supersaiyen312 1353: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1299: 1262: 1224: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1031: 996: 993: 992: 991: 964: 961: 960: 959: 933:86.200.172.237 914: 911: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 766: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 700: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 631: 630: 629: 628: 610: 609: 577: 574: 573: 572: 542: 539: 502: 499: 498: 497: 458: 455: 454: 453: 415: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 392:You're right. 367: 366: 365: 364: 346: 345: 330: 329: 322: 319: 316: 313: 310: 307: 296: 284: 281: 280: 279: 278: 277: 276: 275: 217: 214: 213: 212: 211: 210: 209: 208: 134: 131: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3818: 3807: 3803: 3799: 3795: 3793: 3789: 3785: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3777: 3773: 3769: 3765: 3760: 3752: 3746: 3742: 3738: 3734: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3724: 3720: 3716: 3712: 3708: 3704: 3700: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3676: 3668: 3663: 3658: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3648: 3644: 3639: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3629: 3625: 3621: 3617: 3615: 3611: 3607: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3596: 3592: 3587: 3579: 3577: 3575: 3571: 3567: 3564: 3554: 3550: 3546: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3517: 3513: 3509: 3500: 3498: 3497: 3492: 3487: 3479: 3475: 3471: 3467: 3463: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3452: 3448: 3440: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3412: 3407: 3403: 3399: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3374: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3357: 3347: 3342: 3337: 3333: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3290: 3285: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3262: 3258: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3240:133.87.146.69 3237: 3231: 3227: 3222: 3219: 3216: 3210: 3208: 3207: 3202: 3197: 3182: 3178: 3174: 3169: 3160: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3136: 3130: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3113: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3065: 3060: 3051:Great article 3050: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3025: 3020: 3015: 2994: 2990: 2986: 2979: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2958: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2919: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2841: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2822: 2818: 2814: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2801: 2796: 2792: 2787: 2781: 2780:edit conflict 2773: 2769: 2765: 2760: 2757: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2746: 2741: 2736: 2732: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2563: 2558: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2526: 2521: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2483: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2467: 2465: 2464: 2459: 2454: 2445: 2439: 2434: 2429: 2422: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2408: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2394:User:Taikun20 2392:I agree with 2391: 2390: 2389: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2363: 2355: 2347: 2342: 2337: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2318: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2274: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2242: 2237: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2213: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2165: 2160: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2133: 2127: 2122: 2116: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2010: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1887: 1879: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1730: 1728: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1693: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1661: 1660: 1657: 1653: 1650: 1641: 1638:parameter to 1629: 1625: 1621: 1614: 1613: 1607: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1558: 1555: 1552: 1545: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1526: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1475: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1445: 1438: 1430: 1425: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1399: 1392: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1351: 1343: 1337: 1330: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1316: 1314: 1309: 1307: 1300: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1278: 1271: 1263: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1252:HammerFilmFan 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1227:First of all 1222: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1185: 1178: 1170: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1094: 1092: 1087: 1085: 1079: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1067: 1060: 1052: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1036:HammerFilmFan 1032: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1002: 994: 989: 985: 981: 980: 979: 978: 974: 970: 962: 958: 954: 950: 946: 945: 944: 942: 938: 934: 930: 925: 920: 912: 886: 882: 878: 874: 870: 869: 868: 864: 860: 856: 852: 848: 847: 846: 842: 838: 834: 830: 825: 824: 823: 819: 815: 811: 810: 809: 805: 801: 796: 795: 794: 790: 786: 782: 781: 780: 776: 772: 767: 765: 761: 757: 753: 749: 746: 745: 744: 740: 736: 732: 729: 725: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 699: 695: 691: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 667: 663: 659: 654: 653: 652: 648: 644: 640: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 632: 627: 623: 619: 614: 613: 612: 611: 608: 604: 600: 595: 594: 593: 592: 588: 584: 575: 571: 567: 563: 559: 558: 557: 556: 552: 548: 540: 538: 537: 533: 529: 525: 522: 519: 516: 513: 510: 508: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 479: 478: 477: 476: 472: 468: 467:173.153.3.254 463: 456: 452: 448: 444: 443:173.153.3.254 439: 437: 436: 435: 434: 430: 426: 420: 413: 403: 399: 395: 391: 390: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 363: 359: 355: 350: 349: 348: 347: 344: 340: 336: 332: 331: 327: 323: 320: 317: 314: 311: 308: 305: 301: 297: 294: 290: 289: 288: 282: 274: 270: 266: 262: 261: 260: 256: 252: 248: 247: 246: 242: 238: 234: 233: 232: 231: 227: 223: 215: 207: 203: 199: 195: 194: 193: 189: 185: 181: 180: 179: 175: 171: 166: 165: 164: 163: 159: 155: 150: 149: 145: 144: 142: 132: 130: 128: 124: 120: 116: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3762:— Preceding 3756: 3680: 3638:successor to 3637: 3619: 3584:The Lead in 3583: 3559: 3507: 3504: 3483: 3444: 3378: 3331: 3274: 3234:— Preceding 3223: 3220: 3217: 3214: 3193: 3167: 3144: 3111: 3054: 3011: 2937: 2933: 2890: 2850: 2776: 2729: 2681:The Guardian 2680: 2626: 2621: 2617: 2547: 2543: 2524: 2516: 2492: 2482:the citation 2479: 2471: 2449: 2367:— Preceding 2359: 2316: 2271: 2217: 2138:Ahavahisrael 2087:MeropeRiddle 2072:Ahavahisrael 2069: 2014: 1988: 1890:Fitzcarmalan 1883: 1826: 1809:MeropeRiddle 1794:MeropeRiddle 1788: 1734: 1731:Human Rights 1714: 1667:Noorkhan1985 1665: 1662: 1654: 1651: 1647: 1639: 1624:edit request 1549: 1525:Organization 1479: 1428: 1423: 1355: 1312: 1305: 1229:loaded words 1226: 1130: 1090: 1083: 998: 982:That's nice. 966: 927:— Preceding 919:ICM Research 916: 579: 544: 526: 523: 520: 517: 514: 511: 506: 504: 482: 460: 425:71.221.67.50 421: 417: 286: 219: 151: 146: 140: 138: 136: 113:— Preceding 109: 78: 43: 37: 3768:99.238.82.6 3737:Worldedixor 3731:Well said, 3657:Technophant 3501:Red-linking 3486:Technophant 3480:Conclusions 3425:Mondolkiri1 3421:Technophant 3406:Technophant 3398:Mondolkiri1 3384:Mondolkiri1 3336:Technophant 3279:Technophant 3196:Technophant 3147:remain. -- 3116:Worldedixor 3075:Worldedixor 3019:Technophant 2941:Worldedixor 2913:Technophant 2895:Worldedixor 2873:Worldedixor 2859:Worldedixor 2835:Technophant 2827:Worldedixor 2813:Worldedixor 2795:Technophant 2764:Worldedixor 2740:Technophant 2699:Worldedixor 2635:Worldedixor 2557:Technophant 2530:Worldedixor 2453:Technophant 2428:Technophant 2402:Technophant 2336:Technophant 2275:as well as 2236:Technophant 2154:Technophant 2121:Technophant 2050:Worldedixor 2017:Worldedixor 1973:Worldedixor 1849:Kulmanseidl 1697:Somchai Sun 1497:Worldedixor 873:Worldedixor 859:Worldedixor 837:Worldedixor 800:Worldedixor 771:Worldedixor 748:Worldedixor 735:Worldedixor 643:Worldedixor 528:Worldedixor 487:Worldedixor 394:Worldedixor 354:Worldedixor 222:Worldedixor 184:Worldedixor 154:Worldedixor 36:This is an 3715:well known 3713:. This is 3566:Oiyarbepsy 3531:Dougweller 3508:Daily Mail 3303:Dougweller 3271:statements 3129:This essay 3093:Rreagan007 3037:Dougweller 2978:Dougweller 2963:Dougweller 2934:responsive 2590:Dougweller 2186:DuckDuckGo 1888:. Thanks, 1864:Morgengave 1833:Morgengave 1632:|answered= 1592:Dougweller 1562:Dougweller 1511:Meatsgains 1482:Teaksmitty 1237:Teaksmitty 1116:Dougweller 1102:Teaksmitty 1005:Dougweller 969:Teaksmitty 949:Dougweller 798:reverted. 785:Dougweller 583:Dougweller 380:Dougweller 251:Dougweller 196:Thanks. -- 98:Archive 10 2622:FACTUALLY 2322:Layzeeboi 2299:JRSpriggs 2280:Layzeeboi 2194:JRSpriggs 2188:than the 1771:Mhhossein 1422:"All" is 1372:Terror4us 1169:Bokassa I 1051:Bokassa I 690:JRSpriggs 90:Archive 8 85:Archive 7 79:Archive 6 73:Archive 5 68:Archive 4 60:Archive 1 3764:unsigned 3624:Gazkthul 3606:Gazkthul 3236:unsigned 3226:Teoporta 3134:Philg88 2786:fox news 2631:WP:QUOTE 2548:the base 2517:butchery 2381:contribs 2373:Taikun20 2369:unsigned 1742:Gazkthul 1718:Gazkthul 1682:Gazkthul 1663:Thanks. 1546:Leaflets 1436:Director 1390:Director 1328:Director 1289:Gazkthul 1269:Director 1176:Director 1135:Rashidun 1058:Director 929:unsigned 547:WikiInki 115:unsigned 3784:P123ct1 3677:disinfo 3643:P123ct1 3591:P123ct1 3545:P123ct1 3512:P123ct1 3466:P123ct1 3330:should 3317:P123ct1 3257:P123ct1 3173:P123ct1 3149:P123ct1 3058:Cwobeel 2985:P123ct1 2957:P123ct1 2877:P123ct1 2831:butcher 2685:P123ct1 2604:P123ct1 2573:P123ct1 2496:P123ct1 2484:reads: 2252:P123ct1 2221:P123ct1 1951:P123ct1 1921:P123ct1 1757:P123ct1 1738:Taliban 1578:P123ct1 1530:AHeneen 1424:implied 1197:P123ct1 1021:P123ct1 877:P123ct1 814:P123ct1 756:P123ct1 658:P123ct1 618:P123ct1 599:P123ct1 562:P123ct1 335:P123ct1 265:P123ct1 237:P123ct1 198:P123ct1 170:P123ct1 39:archive 3063:(talk) 2930:WP:AGF 2544:biased 2525:oppose 509:!... 3334:it. ~ 3112:Agree 2855:WP:RS 2697:Yes. 2513:WP:RS 2489:Iraq. 1993:Ericl 1965:Ericl 1937:Ericl 1907:Ericl 1636:|ans= 1622:This 1306:Green 1084:Green 507:WRONG 376:WP:EW 300:WP:EW 293:WP:EW 16:< 3802:talk 3788:talk 3772:talk 3741:talk 3723:talk 3688:talk 3662:talk 3647:talk 3628:talk 3610:talk 3595:talk 3586:ISIS 3570:talk 3549:talk 3535:talk 3525:See 3516:talk 3510:. -- 3491:talk 3470:talk 3451:talk 3429:talk 3411:talk 3388:talk 3365:talk 3341:talk 3332:keep 3321:talk 3307:talk 3284:talk 3261:talk 3244:talk 3230:talk 3201:talk 3177:talk 3168:Done 3153:talk 3145:must 3120:talk 3097:talk 3079:talk 3041:talk 3024:talk 3014:here 2989:talk 2967:talk 2945:talk 2918:talk 2899:talk 2881:talk 2863:talk 2840:talk 2817:talk 2800:talk 2791:diff 2768:talk 2745:talk 2703:talk 2689:talk 2639:talk 2608:talk 2594:talk 2577:talk 2562:talk 2534:talk 2500:talk 2458:talk 2433:talk 2407:talk 2398:here 2377:talk 2341:talk 2326:talk 2303:talk 2284:talk 2256:talk 2241:talk 2225:talk 2198:talk 2159:talk 2150:here 2126:talk 2105:talk 2091:talk 2076:talk 2054:talk 2040:talk 2021:talk 1997:talk 1977:talk 1969:talk 1955:talk 1941:talk 1925:talk 1911:talk 1894:talk 1886:here 1868:talk 1853:talk 1837:talk 1813:talk 1798:talk 1775:talk 1761:talk 1746:talk 1722:talk 1701:talk 1686:talk 1671:talk 1596:talk 1582:talk 1566:talk 1553:and 1534:talk 1515:talk 1501:talk 1486:talk 1460:talk 1443:talk 1429:some 1414:talk 1397:talk 1376:talk 1365:and 1335:talk 1293:talk 1276:talk 1256:talk 1241:talk 1201:talk 1183:talk 1171:.. 1137:and 1120:talk 1106:talk 1065:talk 1040:talk 1025:talk 1009:talk 988:talk 973:talk 953:talk 937:talk 881:talk 863:talk 855:talk 841:talk 833:talk 818:talk 804:talk 789:talk 775:talk 760:talk 739:talk 728:talk 694:talk 662:talk 647:talk 622:talk 603:talk 587:talk 566:talk 551:talk 532:talk 491:talk 471:talk 447:talk 429:talk 398:talk 384:talk 358:talk 339:talk 326:here 269:talk 255:talk 241:talk 226:talk 202:talk 188:talk 174:talk 158:talk 123:talk 1989:NOT 1963:Hi 1634:or 1626:to 1433:-- 1387:-- 1325:-- 1266:-- 1173:-- 1131:all 1055:-- 1034:go. 963:POV 3804:) 3790:) 3774:) 3743:) 3725:) 3690:) 3649:) 3630:) 3612:) 3597:) 3589:-- 3572:) 3551:) 3537:) 3529:. 3518:) 3472:) 3453:) 3431:) 3390:) 3367:) 3323:) 3309:) 3263:) 3246:) 3179:) 3155:) 3122:) 3114:. 3105:I 3099:) 3081:) 3043:) 2991:) 2969:) 2947:) 2901:) 2883:) 2865:) 2819:) 2770:) 2733:: 2705:) 2691:) 2641:) 2610:) 2596:) 2579:) 2536:) 2502:) 2424:}} 2418:{{ 2383:) 2379:• 2328:) 2305:) 2286:) 2258:) 2227:) 2219:-- 2200:) 2192:. 2107:) 2093:) 2078:) 2056:) 2042:) 2023:) 1999:) 1979:) 1957:) 1943:) 1927:) 1913:) 1896:) 1870:) 1855:) 1839:) 1831:. 1815:) 1800:) 1777:) 1763:) 1748:) 1724:) 1703:) 1688:) 1673:) 1640:no 1598:) 1584:) 1576:-- 1568:) 1536:) 1517:) 1503:) 1488:) 1462:) 1416:) 1378:) 1361:, 1295:) 1258:) 1243:) 1203:) 1195:-- 1122:) 1108:) 1042:) 1027:) 1019:-- 1011:) 975:) 955:) 939:) 883:) 865:) 843:) 820:) 806:) 791:) 777:) 762:) 741:) 696:) 664:) 656:-- 649:) 624:) 616:-- 605:) 589:) 568:) 553:) 534:) 493:) 473:) 449:) 431:) 400:) 386:) 360:) 341:) 333:-- 306:.) 271:) 257:) 243:) 228:) 204:) 190:) 176:) 168:-- 160:) 125:) 94:→ 64:← 3800:( 3786:( 3770:( 3739:( 3721:( 3717:. 3686:( 3664:) 3660:( 3645:( 3626:( 3608:( 3593:( 3568:( 3547:( 3533:( 3514:( 3493:) 3489:( 3468:( 3449:( 3427:( 3413:) 3409:( 3404:~ 3386:( 3363:( 3343:) 3339:( 3319:( 3305:( 3286:) 3282:( 3277:~ 3259:( 3242:( 3228:( 3203:) 3199:( 3175:( 3151:( 3118:( 3095:( 3077:( 3039:( 3026:) 3022:( 3017:~ 2987:( 2980:: 2976:@ 2965:( 2959:: 2955:@ 2943:( 2920:) 2916:( 2897:( 2879:( 2861:( 2842:) 2838:( 2825:@ 2815:( 2802:) 2798:( 2782:) 2778:( 2766:( 2747:) 2743:( 2701:( 2687:( 2637:( 2606:( 2592:( 2575:( 2564:) 2560:( 2555:~ 2532:( 2498:( 2460:) 2456:( 2451:~ 2435:) 2431:( 2409:) 2405:( 2375:( 2343:) 2339:( 2324:( 2301:( 2282:( 2254:( 2243:) 2239:( 2223:( 2196:( 2161:) 2157:( 2136:@ 2128:) 2124:( 2119:~ 2103:( 2089:( 2074:( 2052:( 2038:( 2019:( 1995:( 1975:( 1967:( 1953:( 1939:( 1923:( 1909:( 1892:( 1866:( 1851:( 1835:( 1811:( 1796:( 1773:( 1759:( 1744:( 1720:( 1699:( 1684:( 1669:( 1594:( 1580:( 1564:( 1532:( 1513:( 1499:( 1484:( 1458:( 1446:) 1440:( 1412:( 1400:) 1394:( 1374:( 1370:- 1338:) 1332:( 1313:C 1291:( 1279:) 1273:( 1254:( 1239:( 1199:( 1186:) 1180:( 1141:. 1118:( 1104:( 1091:C 1068:) 1062:( 1038:( 1023:( 1007:( 990:) 986:( 971:( 951:( 935:( 879:( 861:( 853:( 839:( 831:( 816:( 802:( 787:( 773:( 758:( 737:( 726:( 692:( 660:( 645:( 620:( 601:( 585:( 564:( 549:( 530:( 489:( 469:( 445:( 427:( 396:( 382:( 356:( 337:( 328:. 295:. 267:( 253:( 239:( 224:( 200:( 186:( 172:( 156:( 121:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index