Talk:Israel–Hamas war/Archive 16

2550:“We also strongly condemn Israel’s indiscriminate military attacks against the already exhausted Palestinian people of Gaza, comprising over 2.3 million people, nearly half of whom are children. They have lived under unlawful blockade for 16 years, and already gone through five major brutal wars, which remain unaccounted for,” they said. “This amounts to collective punishment,” the UN experts said. “There is no justification for violence that indiscriminately targets innocent civilians, whether by Hamas or Israeli forces. This is absolutely prohibited under international law and amounts to a war crime.” The experts also expressed concern about reports that journalists and media workers reporting on the conflict had been targeted, with seven Palestinian journalists and media workers reportedly killed in Israeli airstrikes. ... As a result of the Israeli attacks against Gaza, by air, land and sea, at least 1,100 Palestinians have been killed, including older persons and 290 children, and more than 5,000 injured. The airstrikes appear to have targeted densely populated areas, including markets, two hospitals, destroyed residential buildings and damaged 20 United Nations Reliefs and Works Agency (UNRWA) facilities, including schools sheltering displaced civilians. As of 11 October, the UN estimated that at least 340,000 people have been displaced within Gaza, and nearly 218,600 people are sheltering in 92 UNRWA schools across the Gaza Strip. “Indiscriminately killing civilians in the context of hostilities, with no regard for the principles of distinction, precaution and proportionality, is a war crime,” the experts said. They also stressed that indiscriminate rocket attacks, bombing of civilian infrastructure and shelling densely populated areas constitute grave breaches of international humanitarian law, whether committed by Palestinian armed groups or by Israeli Defence Forces. On 9 October, the Israeli Defence Minister announced that authorities would completely cut essential supplies to Gaza, stating they are fighting “human animals.” The Minister threatened to bomb those attempting to provide humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip. On 9 and 10 October, Israel reportedly bombed the Rafah crossing at the Gaza-Egyptian border, disrupting movement in and out of Gaza, rendering the crossing closed and the enclave completely blockaded. “Besides this appalling language that dehumanises the Palestinian people, especially those who have been unlawfully “imprisoned” in Gaza for 16 years, we condemn the withholding of essential supplies such as food, water, electricity and medicines. Such actions will precipitate a severe humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where its population is now at inescapable risk of starvation. Intentional starvation is a crime against humanity,” the experts said. 2927:. Notably the UN does not accuse Israel of war crimes in this, but rather UN Independent Experts do. What's the difference? Well according to the article: "The Special Rapporteurs are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organisation and serve in their individual capacity." The UN goes to great lenghts to highlight that these are independent workers, calling them as such multiple times. They are affiliated with the UN but they also do not work for the UN. If the UN wanted to accuse Israel they would have. The UN in their own paper has taken the effort to distringuish themselves from their independent experts, Wiki should follow the UN's lead and respect their decision. To say that "The UN Says Israel Committed War Crimes" is strongly misrepresenting what the source says. 1258:: "In Palestine, the fate of Palestinian prisoners held in Israel is also an important issue, increasingly so under the most far-right government in Israel's history. Over the past year, Israel's far-right national security minister, Itamar Ben Gvir, has sought to clamp down on the rights of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails. From limiting family visits to moving dozens of Palestinians to Nafha prison, widely considered to be one of the most notorious in the country, Ben Gvir has adopted a policy of making the lives of Palestinian prisoners incrementally more difficult. There are around 5,200 political prisoners in Israeli jails, including more than 1,264 administrative detainees, according to Palestinian rights group Addameer. Under Israel's discriminatory system, Palestinians tried in military courts have a conviction rate of 99.7 percent, while Israelis are very rarely convicted over attacks on Palestinians. About a quarter of Palestinian prisoners are held without charge or trial in a controversial practice known as "administrative detention"." 2851:

the other discussion appearing relatively inactive at the time, without the concern having been addressed and agreement there at that point in time. This wasn't an attempt to bypass consensus here, just a product of highly similar discussions happening concurrently on the same subject and not noticing the expansion of another one. Another user in third separate discussion about this pointed out that the allegations aren't just against Hamas and Israel, but other militant groups. If we have RS making that distinction as well and it's discussed in the body, perhaps the "final" version of the line could reflect that too.

340:. The ICRC as a neutral intermediary stands ready to conduct humanitarian visits and to facilitate communications between family members and hostages with the goal for their eventual release. At the same time, inhabitants of Gaza have to endure a lack of drinking water that was already problematic before the onset of the hostilities. The ICRC working closely with Red Crescent partners has a neutral, independent and exclusively humanitarian mandate during such escalations of violence in the Middle East and urges all parties to protect the lives of civilians, to reduce their suffering and protect their dignity. 2255:“We also strongly condemn Israel’s indiscriminate military attacks against the already exhausted Palestinian people of Gaza, comprising over 2.3 million people, nearly half of whom are children. They have lived under unlawful blockade for 16 years, and already gone through five major brutal wars, which remain unaccounted for,” they said. ... “This amounts to collective punishment,” the UN experts said. “There is no justification for violence that indiscriminately targets innocent civilians, whether by Hamas or Israeli forces. This is absolutely prohibited under international law and amounts to a war crime.” 1228:: "Hamas already has said it seeks the release of all Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails — some 4,500 detainees, according to Israeli rights group B’Tselem — in exchange for the Israeli captives. The fate of prisoners for Palestinians is perhaps just as emotional as it is for Israelis. With an estimated 750,000 Palestinians having passed through Israel prisons since Israel captured the West Bank in the 1967 Mideast war, most Palestinians have either spent time in Israeli jail or know someone who has. Israel sees them as terrorists, but Palestinians view detainees as heroes." 1231: 1943:

more text of speculation about Israeli actions, most of which have not yet occurred or may not fit the definition of "war crime" or are inaccurately described. Then lots of speculation, general condemnations of crimes, and uncontextualized claims about the actions of the Israelis. And the section is replete with quotations and opinions of self-styled watchdogs of no particular distinction, one of which boasts that it's a "youth run" Norwegian outfit in Switzerland. OK.

460: 31: 1308:

Background. This page is about Israel-Hamas conflict and Gaza. The included text is about some generic Palestinian prisoners, not Hamas members (that would be more relevant). In addition, this page is not about prisoners, this is just one of many aspects of the invasion. Such info can be provided in a relevant section about prisoners exchange (if there will be one), not as a part of the general Background about this conflict.

603: 292: 1234:: "Such incursions would give ample opportunity to capture Israeli officers and soldiers...According to the latest report by B’Tselem, the Israeli human rights group, there were 4,499 Palestinians in prison on what Israel defined as “security” grounds in June. That number included 183 from the Gaza Strip. Several hundred more are being held for illegally being inside Israel." 2706:

process. But Israel’s campaign so far would meet those criteria, argues Aurel Sari, a law professor at the University of Exeter who lectures to NATO armed forces. The scale of Hamas’s attack, its demonstrated intent and proven capability means that invading Gaza or even occupying it temporarily to destroy the group “will be relatively easy to justify” legally, he says.

1222:: "Before October 7th Hamas held just two Israeli captives, plus the bodies of two soldiers killed during the 2014 war. Now it has scores of them, both alive and dead. Addameer, a Palestinian ngo, estimates 5,200 Palestinian prisoners are being held in Israeli jails, including more than 1,200 in so-called “administrative detention”—held without charge." 3076:

sentence also does not make a statement of fact which could mean a consensus among scholars, it merely relays what the UN and various human rights groups have said. None of the things you say are implied are implied in my reading of the proposed sentence. So no, I disagree with this and find it mealy mouthed and begs the question allegations from who?

1246:: (published on 9 october) "Since 1967, Israel has detained approximately one million Palestinians in the occupied territories, including tens of thousands of children. Currently, there are 5,000 Palestinians incarcerated in Israeli prisons. Among them, 160 children and around 1,100 detainees are held without charge or trial, according to a UN report." 656: 2401:“We also strongly condemn Israel’s indiscriminate military attacks against the already exhausted Palestinian people of Gaza, comprising over 2.3 million people, nearly half of whom are children. They have lived under unlawful blockade for 16 years, and already gone through five major brutal wars, which remain unaccounted for,” they said. 2341:“We also strongly condemn Israel’s indiscriminate military attacks against the already exhausted Palestinian people of Gaza, comprising over 2.3 million people, nearly half of whom are children. They have lived under unlawful blockade for 16 years, and already gone through five major brutal wars, which remain unaccounted for,” they said. 2331:“We strongly condemn the horrific crimes committed by Hamas, the deliberate and widespread killing and hostage-taking of innocent civilians, including older persons and children. These actions constitute heinous violations of international law and international crimes, for which there must be urgent accountability,” the experts said. 1027:

or abusing them on both sides because they contravene morals, religion and international law", and "We renounce violence and adhere to international legitimacy, peaceful popular resistance, and political action as a path to achieving our national goals", at least, according to the WAFA website, which you can find here:

1252:"Thousands of Palestinians are being held in Israeli prisons, many of them convicted of security offenses or involvement in terrorism. Muhammad Deif, the leader of Hamas’s military wing, cited the detention of thousands of Palestinian militants in Israeli jails as one of the reasons for Saturday’s assault." 3481:

Added re the UN experts link. There were previously sources after this sentence but they may have been deleted in an contentious edit and not restored with the sentence. Since the statement currently reads "a number of human rights organizations", we should supply a source that says that explicitly.

2778:

Is there anybody saying the UN and these human rights groups have not accused the parties of war crimes? If not there is no weight issue in that sentence. If we were to say as a statement of fact war crimes occurred then there is a weight question, and then you may have a point. But there is no view

2719:

choice would to be to simply leave the term as "war crimes" while explaining what that means in the section for it. The sentence implies to me that human rights organizations have a generally singular view of each actor's conduct during the war. There's multiple reliable sources that contradict this

2675:

The proposed wording only seeks to describe the views published by the United Nations and human rights organisations. It does not make a blanket statement in Knowledge's own voice. So the question before us is merely whether the views are correctly described (I think they are), and whether the views

2279:

I'd be hesitant to go with plural for Israel - the white phosphorous allegation doesn't appear to have been made by the UN, and reliable sources reporting on it don't give it the same credence as they do other allegations - but singular is appropriate on the basis of the siege. I'm not sure what the

1627:

This article clearly states the Hamas on the good side, while limits the horrific actions it did to babies and women, entire families were wiped away, burned in their house. Instead this article focuses on the safety of the Palestine people from April. Wake up! Hamas kidnapped kids and threatened to

1026:

I also haven't been able to find where Mahmoud Abbas states that Palestinians have the right to defend themselves on the WAFA website, though I'm not claiming that it wasn't said. More recently, Abbas has stated, in conversation with the King of Jordan, "We reject the practices of killing civilians

3346:

targeting and killing Israeli civilians during the massacres. It then describes opinions and denials with regard to Israel actions, and they are clearly different from the actions by Hamas militants. They maybe "better" or "worse", depending on someone's view, but they are definitely not the same -

2850:

Since the start of this discussion, the sentence has been changed multiple times, most recently by me (from a different, vague version apparently reached without consensus). This was partly out of confusing this discussion with another discussion about the same line, started by the same editor, and

1919:

To be clear, can you back up your statement that this article "clearly states that Hamas is on the good side"? And what evidence have you concerning the "actions it did to babies"? For are you not aware that - as reported by CNN and other news outlets - even the US President is now back-tracking on

3361:

I dont think anybody is denying that Hamas attacked Israel and killed scores of civilians. But a number of sources put that in the context of the ongoing siege of Gaza over the last nearly two decades. The source I provided was showing that rights groups are saying that both of them are committing

2195:

Likewise agree with Selfstudier, would be a better summary of the section we have as well. Though I would change the wording of "amounting to", thats more for other crimes in international law, war crimes are generally about specific actions (targeting civilians, indiscriminate attacks, collective

1942:

I wouldn't get too caught up in the way the IP OP expressed their concern. The substance needs to be addresssed. Look at the "war crimes" section: A few lines about the Hamas attack and everything it encompassed - with crimes evident on their face, beyond any doubt. Then the article has many times

1537:

that "The fate of prisoners for Palestinians is perhaps just as emotional as it is for Israelis. With an estimated 750,000 Palestinians having passed through Israel prisons since Israel captured the West Bank in the 1967 Mideast war, most Palestinians have either spent time in Israeli jail or know

2705:

In practice, though, international law and the specific rules that govern warfare—the law of armed conflict (LOAC), also known as international humanitarian law (IHL)—give Israel considerable latitude to attack Hamas, according to legal experts... Drawing that line is a subjective and contentious

2371:

The sentence is about accusations by the UN and by human rights groups, and you are misreading the UN statement. This amounts to a war crime is about the blockade. The other war crime is the indiscriminate attacks. And then later, intentional starvation is a crime against humanity. There are also

2322:

The Washington Post article was actually one of the ones I was looking at when I said the reliable sources reporting on it don't give it the same credence as they do other allegations; for example, rather than saying Israel has used white phosphorous, it tones it down and says they are alleged to

985:

The response in Palestine section cites an article dated October 7th, which is closed, for an event that, apparently, occurred on October 8th. Fatah, the Palestine Liberation Organization, etc., are also bound to have released some kind of statements on the attacks and subsequent war, which I do

558:

even the reference/source has been changed by someone. the citation used for the statement "At least 1,400 Israelis were killed" is "Israel targets northern Gaza with barrage of air strikes" by middleeastmonitor.com like what? It should be reverted back.this source does not even talk about dead

335:

and Isreali officials to avoid further carnage. Fabrizio Carboni, regional director of the ICRC and ICRF for the Near and Middle East points at the impact of the war on residents of Gaza, who are now cut off from all food shipments, electricity and medical supplies, which particularly affects the

3307:

That is all personal opinion, personal opinion that ignores that Gaza has been under Israeli occupation since 1967, and under blockade since 2007. Yes, lots of sources deny the idea that Hamas started anything. But it is all personal opinion, and as such completely irrelevant on a Knowledge talk

1057:

a section on Palestinian prisoners, that includes the number of Palestinians imprisoned in Israel, Hamas statement that they abducted Israelis so they could exchange them, and Hamas' previous abduction of Gilad Shalit and the subsequent prisoner exchange. Most of the sources I used mention these

3128:

I dont see how, it makes no comment on it and beyond that where are the accusations against them anyway? Why would we prioritize the UN statements and the human rights groups? Because sources have prioritized them, compare how many sources have discussed HRW or the UN Human Rights Office or the

3075:

I think that is near the point of meaninglessness. I also dont quite get the PIJ bit, nor the idea that there is a present consensus among scholars of international law. The proposed sentence does not say PIJ did not commit any war crimes, but they arent the major player in this conflict. The

2571:

No where does it say that the UN accused Israel of war crimes. Read the article, they are "UN indepedent experts". The UN then goes on to define what an independent expert is by emphasizing that they are not UN staff. The UN created a distinction in their article because they felt that it was

1959:

Thats nonsense. You have Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and B'tselem all cited in that section. Those are not "self-styled watchdogs of no particular distinction", those are reliable sources on the topic of human rights and international law, and they are cited for making explicit

2969:

This phrasing seems to reflect the general current consensus. As long as the line says who is accusing, what they are being accused of, and who is being accused, there shouldn't be any issue. The vague "and many allegations of war crimes" wasn't an accurate summary, and raised NPOV concerns.

1307:

Yes, sure, this info is sourced, exactly as I said above. This is not an issue. And yes, painting Israel in a highly negative light (it seems we both agree about it) is not a reason for removal. The reason for removal is different: such info (whole big subsection) is hardly relevant for the

1799:

It sounds like what you're saying is that the article isn't 'neutral' because it doesn't embody your PoV. These are not euphemisms; they are the most neutral term to describe a situation with great moral complexity and must be understood within a profoundly complicated historical context.

1290:

BTW, I've also added the Israeli POV to that section. I had previously not done that, that was my mistake. I've added that many of the prisoners were convicted of terrorism in Israeli courts and that while Palestinians view some of the prisoners as heroes, Israelis view them as

1268:

said 'Hamas is ready to release all the civilians, all the women in exchange for releasing 40 Palestinian women who are in Israeli prisons. I think it will be time to release the 5,300 Palestinians who are in Israeli prisons, including some who have been there for 44 years'

2344:“This amounts to collective punishment,” the UN experts said. “There is no justification for violence that indiscriminately targets innocent civilians, whether by Hamas or Israeli forces. This is absolutely prohibited under international law and amounts to a war crime.” 2229:

In other words, for Hamas it talks about plural war crimes in the past tense, but about Israel it talks about a singular war crime in the future tense; a singular war crime that it says if Israel continues down its path of besieging Gaza will occur, but hasn't yet.

3364:

Experts say the blockade, which is hitting the territory’s more than 2 million residents, violates international law. “Collective punishment is a war crime. Israel is doing that by cutting electricity, water, food, blocking aid from entering the Gaza Strip,” Shakir

1814:

Captured was used because civilians and soldiers were both taken. Hostages is generally used for civilians, while prisoner of war is generally used for soldiers. Captured and captive are the most neutral terms to describe both. Regarding the use of terrorist, read

330:

that has killed thousands of civilians on both sides. The ICRC working closely with its alinged organisation has called the recent escalation of violence “abhorrent” and implored both sides to reduce the suffering of civilians. The ICRC is in constant contact with

3308:

page. Please use sources instead of providing us with your own novel analysis. Your earlier comment, that the sources do not give the same view on war crimes for both sides here, remains a falsehood. You can see proof of the lie at for example at this headline

1784:

and tries to justify a massacre with infinite examples of euphemism like civilians being "captured" and not "kidnapped", and being "captives" and not "hostages". Hamas terrorists being called "militants" (even after 82 countries recognized them as terrorists).

1433:

BTW, I saw you moved the content to "Palestinian reaction" section. This really isn't the right place at all, as of the above 10 RS I quoted, only 1 is based on Palestinian sources. And none of this is a "reaction" given that its covering events preceding the

3373:

Jan Egeland, secretary-general of the Norwegian Refugee Council, also called the order illegal. It is “not an evacuation opportunity, it’s an order to relocate. Under humanitarian law, it’s called forcible transfer of populations, and it’s a war crime,” he

1001:

Fatah calls for an escalation of the conflict, but the Palestine Liberation Organization calls to end the conflict immediately. I'm guessing there's some sort of internal dispute there, since Fatah is a part of the PLO. Just what I pulled up from a quick

2736:

The Economist gives that as one persons view, Aurel Sari. Not as a fact nor even as something they themselves are saying. It also does not change that the UN and a number of human rights organizations have indeed said both sides have committed war crimes.

1407:" The connection is that Hamas took prisoners as bargaining chips in a possible prisoner exchange. Whether that prisoner exchange happens or not is irrelevant - it doesn't change the fact that 100+ Israelis have already been abducted for a particular goal. 870:

was the originator of the request. KlayCax, I'm afraid "Per an editor requesting this on talk," is not enough context. I searched this talk page for "neutrality" and could find nothing relevant. Unless you can elaborate, that note should be taken down. -

386: 3288:

To begin with something, they are not equal because it was Hamas who attacked Israel, i.e. started the war. No one denies this fact. Using an obvious analogy here, it does matter a lot that Russia invade Ukraine, rather than vice verse, hence the

2949:

misrepresentation, given that these independent experts are part of the UN's process, and the UN publishes the views of these experts in its press releases, but I agree that saying "United Nations independent experts" has improved precision.

2175:

Support this or a similar revision. The current statement is "There were widespread deaths of civilians, and many allegations of war crimes." This is vague, and an inadequate summary of the issue. Readers ought to know who is accusing whom.

402:

The analysis section should be integrated to background. The Israeli intelligence failure, the context of the occupation, the Saudi-Israeli negotiations, Netanyahu's preoccupation with the judicial reform protests, are all suitable for the

2892:

above. (Klay, note that if you revert me as well in the next 20 hours or so, you will be in breach of the 1RR restriction that applies to this article.) For reference, the current wording in the lead after further edits by others is

1864:

Good sir, you clearly have extreme bias. Knowledge is focused on providing factical information, without bias, and if you consider this to be a sign of "Damn libs and arabs ruling the world", no one forces you to use the website.

1565:

There is a big difference between the article in WaPo and this page. The article in WaPo is written on a different subject: the hostages. If this WP page was about hostages, then yes, such background info would be appropriate.

1976:"That's nonsense"? Nothing more focused to say? Note the difference between Amnesty International, whose words are measured and widely respected, and the random POV's of a dozen lesser outfits, including various UN monickers. 1359:

The sources above do make the connection, but what is it exactly? The Hamas leaders explain why they believe it was just for them to take Israeli hostages. I do not think we should create a subsection that makes such point.

1322:

2052:

this is extremely biased and wrong approach for a platform such as Knowledge. You cannot sell some specific narrative or view by changing the goal posts whenever and however you want, depending upon your own biases.

2405:

Intentional starvation would be a second crime, but fortunately it hasn't gone to that extent yet and I hope and believe Israel will relent before it does; the sources discuss this in terms of a future possibility:

3113:

I'm bringing up PIJ because the current wording implies that they haven't been accused of war crimes. Couldn't "all" work? That seems like the most reasonable wording to me. The other has connotation problems.

1734:

You mean debunked by a 4chan post and a very inaccurate AI detection website? Many journalist, the US president, and Israeli authorities all talked about it so I think mention of it does belong in this article

1960:

accusations of war crimes against Israel. You can try to pretend that your framing of that section is accurate here as you couldnt get your way in the section above, but I wont play along with that fantasy.

2326:

Looking at the Reuters article, I'm not seeing allegations of plural war crimes; just the singular allegation in regards to the siege. The same with the special procedures link; in regards to Hamas it says:

3407:"The United Nations and human rights groups have characterized both Hamas' and Israel's conduct as amounting to war crimes." or similar, the simplest and most straightforward representation of the sources. 2456: 2408:

Such actions will precipitate a severe humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where its population is now at inescapable risk of starvation. Intentional starvation is a crime against humanity,” the experts said.

1458:

Going through the sources listed here, adding some lines about the prisoners, as the bargaining chips would be a development. I prefer the text to be the source voice, not solely what Hamas states. --

1240:: "The Palestinian Prisoners Association puts the number held in Israeli jails at about 5,250. If Israel agreed to releasing all of them, it would be a huge win for Hamas and other militant groups..." 1629: 341: 2628:

on the matter that Israel actually is committing war crimes, unlike Hamas. Although simply listing "Hamas" in the lead also gives a particular tinge of bias, imo. I recommend leaving both out for

2416:

At the moment, we only have sources saying that UN special rapporteurs that either party has committed war crimes; we don't have the UN saying it in its own voice. We need a source that does that.

1837: 1686: 1658: 1216:: " said hostages would not be released until all Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails are freed, referring to Israel's detention of over 1,200 prisoners, mostly Palestinians, without charges." 2054: 1721: 1534: 1225: 3362:

war crimes. That was two different points, one replying to your personal opinion, one replying to repeated false statements. What the source says, despite your inaccurate portrayal of it, is

2544:

any wording along the lines of "The United Nations and human rights groups have characterized both Hamas' and Israel's conduct as amounting to war crimes." As for UN comments on Israel, note

2049:

if a given human rights body is served as a citation to term something as “war crime”, in another article while criticising Saudi Arabia you cannot find alternative sources to make a point.

2046:

Hi. If you’re using certain sources or bodies like human rights commission and amnesty international to add value and moral judgment to your argument then you cannot cherry pick like that.

2017: 1884: 2895:

There were widespread deaths of civilians, and United Nations independent experts and human rights groups have accused both Hamas and Israel of committing war crimes during the conflict.

1836:

These people arent milatants or soldiers. Hamas is a recognized terror organization in many countries. Call them what they are ffs. TeRRoRiSTS. Damn libs and arabs ruining the world

2030:

Thats the Human Rights Council. The High Commissioner on Human Rights is head of the Human Rights Office and is appointed by the Secretary General and approved by the General Assembly.

2811:. Since it doesn't: 1.) Imply a common consensus on which committed war crimes 2.) Reflects the body 3.) Doesn't exclude other Palestinian militant groups. 05:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 3482:

I think we have several already, but am open to discussion about which is most appropriate. Linking the major ones, HRW, Amnesty International, would also be appropriate in addition.

2412:

However, there is a bigger issue with that proposed sentence, for both Hamas and Israel, that I've only seen now with additional information from the most recent source you provided:

3444: 117: 3461:

The rules, known as international humanitarian law, are designed to limit harm to non-combatants in war; they are distinct from the law regarding the legitimacy of going to war.

2695:

There's nothing wrong with the denotation. It's the connotation. It implies that there is a consensus among human rights organization that both sides have committed war crimes.

1819:. Note that terms like "freedom fighters" are also to be avoided. In what ways do you feel the article is justifying a massacre? Do you have specific examples you can point to? 2676:

of the UN and of human rights organisations on Israel's and Hamas's conduct (PIJ aren't mentioned at all in the lead section) are due a mention in the lead (I think they are).

219:

Hot off the press is not the right time to publish such content. When there are multiple high quality sources covering such a statement, we should then consider whether it has

3189:

I agree with Nableezy here. The fact is that the UN independent experts and the human rights orgs have singled out Israel and Hamas and their views are very widely reported.

3145:

Because the UN Human Rights Council, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, et al. have all faced criticism of their own, and there's notable dissents from their opinion.

3060:

issues by disproportionately highlighting a implying (non-existent) present consensus among scholars of international law on the matter. Does this wording satisfy everyone?

1079:. As written, this sounds like a justification of the hostage-taking by Hamas. When the actual process of prisoner exchange will begin, we can include such info in the 1841: 114: 1703:, feel free to request an edit here to add it. However, most photos on news sites (like the telegraph) are copyrighted, which is generally not allowed on Knowledge. 1720:

that was a fake news and has now been debunked, you can now please shut the eff up and sit the eff down. It’s good it was never part of this article to begin with.

1508:

This is an important part of it because it connects the entire text to the subject of the page. But this is not Background. This is a claim/reaction by Hamas made

240: 1417:

But the most important thing is that dozens of RS treat this information as relevant background to the war. So I don't understand why you're going against them?

2091:

Is this sentence in the lede an accurate reflection of the body that mentions how rights groups have accused both Hamas and Israel of committing war crimes (

1119:

make the point that the vengeance/hostage taking by Hamas was just. To be clear, this info is well-sourced. It just should not be in that section right now.

3429: 3313: 2545: 2273: 1850:"Damn libs and arabs ruining the world" Okay buddy, you clearly have extreme bias and should not be giving your opinion on a website focused on neutrality. 1628:

kill hostages. Hamas burned down houses to get civilians out of it and kill them. Look at the tragedy at kibbutz be'eri, the whole place smells like death!

1529:

But I already accepted that Hamas' reaction should be in the Reactions section, but the rest of the text should be in the Background section. Consider that

3290: 2414:

UN special rapporteurs are unpaid, independent figures mandated by the Human Rights Council. They do not speak for the UN but report their findings to it.

239:

It's not a new talking point, and most reliable sources have been covering it as "Hamas refuses to admit it planned to kill civilians, or to show remorse"

2779:

that conflicts with the sentence the United Nations and several human rights organizations have accused both Hamas and Israel of committing war crimes.

1237: 1513: 3250:. Such statement equates Hamas and Israel. Sources do not do it, even such as UN, if one reads entire publications, instead of citing out of context. 424:

the beginning of this war. The only topic that really gives background information to the start of the war is the context of the Israeli occupation.

2888:

the reference to Hamas and Israel both having been accused of war crimes by the UN and human rights orgs in the lead, using the wording proposed by

1816: 1671:

You're missing the point. You criticize the article for being partial, but you won't point out what sentences or claims are supposed to be partial?

3369:

The International Committee of the Red Cross said the order to leave along with the siege “are not compatible with international humanitarian law.”

2444: 2299: 1243: 1203:

Is information on Palestinian prisoners in Israel relevant? Yes, as various RS have covered Palestinian prisoners in the context of this conflict:

1485:. They are portrayed as a background by the utilized sources. Is there any substantiated objection against inclusion of this introductory text? -- 2216: 2306:

the collective punishment of the over a decade long blockade, both being war crimes. So plural works for all parts of that sentence in my view.

1643:

It's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source.

3149: 986:

think it would be relevant to add to the article, as well as to just get some ground truth to the responses of what is happening in Palestine.

276: 131: 2700: 2625: 1261: 634:

The word "recently" should be removed from the sentence "... with Saudi Arabian crown prince Mohammed bin Salman recently stating ..." as per

442:

There’s a big difference between political commentary and what is happening so I disagree with this as it tends to push political narratives

2608:- Implies that the "both" view is overwhelmingly predominant. Each organization's views should instead be given in the body of the article. 1219: 530: 522: 517: 505: 500: 492: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 1927: 814:

A quick search through WhatLinksHere suggests that instances of this templates use which have a reason parameter would be better served by

2423:

speaks in the UN's voice then the Reuters source comes close, but doesn't quite do what we need for the proposed sentence as it only says

2250: 2246: 3428:, ideally links to statements from the human rights groups making these accusations. A few appropriate sources to add there would be the 1538:

someone who has." This is referring to a long-term trend in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, not just a reaction to the current events.

2298:. Oops, sorry about the link, too many open tabs. There are also statements by UN officials, eg the High Commissioner on Human Rights ( 1633: 345: 161: 2533: 1897:

Can you provide concrete examples? Blanket statements about the article as a whole won't lead to increased neutrality in the article.

1690: 1662: 1149:

Like I just said above, this is not OR. This is merely an irrelevant information, clearly placed to paint Israel in a negative light.

1134: 1102: 2058: 1725: 543:

I'm already at 1RR. But why was the massacre at the music festival removed from the lead? It's clearly notable enough for inclusion.

387:“Israel and the Occupied Territories: Hospitals risk turning into morgues without electricity; hostages must be relrased immediately” 3452: 2021: 1888: 203:

that we should report all significant views. This is just hot off the press, so news sources are only beginning to pick up on this.

2448: 1207: 2151: 1759:

This article, and all other Knowledge articles, should not be written to identify good and bad sides. Familiarize yourself with

684:

A mosque destroyed by an Israeli airstrike. Under the Rome Statute, it is a war crime to intentionally attack places of worship.

3340: 3309: 1760: 3456: 3168:

Again it would be a wording issue; "all participants in the war" can mean literally every combatant on both sides of the war.

2399:

My understanding is that "This amounts to collective punishment" and "amounts to a war crime" applies to the entire paragraph

3199: 2960: 2907: 2686: 2562: 1549:(which mentions the prisoner issue, albeit to a much lesser extent since no Israelis were captured by Hamas during that war). 337: 174: 2198:

The United Nations and human rights groups have accused both Hamas and Israel of committing war crimes during the conflict.

1622:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1249: 3352: 3298: 3255: 3231:

UN independent experts and human rights groups accusing both Hamas and Israel of committing war crimes during the conflict

2082:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1571: 1520: 1515:. Therefore, I object including this to Background section. Some other sections - I am not sure. Yes, if it fits context. 1387: 1365: 1350: 1328: 1313: 1154: 1124: 1092: 2100:

Human Rights Watch and the United Nations have characterized both Hamas' and Israel's conduct as amounting to warcrimes.

1255: 1410:

Except for that last sentence (which we can drop if you like), all the other sentences are about events that happened

1210:: "Four in 10 Palestinian men spend time in Israel jails. Hamas says it wants to exchange captured Israelis for them." 2997:

I think there's an overwhelming consensus among editors that war crimes allegations should be included in the lead.

2295: 559:

israelis seperately. what is going on here?Last RS clearly mentioned "massacre". This current source is not even RS.

467: 38: 2924: 613: 476: 302: 47: 17: 3489: 3312:. See how it says both of them are committing war crimes? What part is being cited out of context in for example 3175: 2977: 2858: 2801:

There have been allegations of widespread human rights allegations committed by all major participants in the war

2647: 2183: 1904: 1870: 1826: 1770: 1657:

What? Do you want me to go post here a picture of a beheaded baby? I pretty sure you are not allowed to do that.

1174:. We similarly wouldn't exclude any information that painted the Palestinians in a bad light. We state the facts. 564: 1075:

Noticing this claim by Hamas on the page is fine, but it does not mean we should include such large sub-section

3426:

a number of human rights groups have accused both Hamas and Israel of committing war crimes during the conflict

3348: 3294: 3251: 3056:

The sentence is neutral, correctly states that all sides have been accused of war crimes, and does not present

2596: 1740: 1708: 1567: 1516: 1383: 1361: 1346: 1324: 1309: 1165: 1150: 1120: 1088: 720: 1931: 1597:

This is not a productive topic of discussion. In future, posts like this should just be closed or reverted as

1170:

we can't exclude information from a page simply because it "paint Israel in a negative light" as wikipedia is

1005: 3470: 2932: 2838: 2577: 2478: 1648: 1138: 1106: 1036: 1017: 991: 892: 809: 609: 298: 952: 336:

functioning of local hospitals there. But he stresses that the taking of hostages is also prohibited under

2432: 2362: 2285: 2235: 1866: 1855: 1805: 1606: 560: 3449:

The collective punishment of Gaza’s civilian population amounts to a war crime – it is cruel and inhumane

2125:"The United nations and human rights groups have...." might be better? (Amnesty, HRW and B'tselem afaik) 2016:

You mean the same organization that put Saudi Arabia in its human rights whatever arbitration committee?

1790: 1736: 1058:

facts in their own reporting of this conflict. Is there any issues with covering this in the background?

738: 701: 3412: 2486: 2166: 2130: 2107: 1556: 1441: 1424: 1298: 1280: 1181: 1171: 1133:

Its not for us to OR. That is what the actors in the situation literally said and sourced by him above.

1065: 775: 665: 410: 327: 210: 149: 127: 3051: 2762:

there have been allegations of widespread human rights allegations committed by participants in the war

2428: 2358: 2281: 2231: 948: 3483: 3169: 3023: 2971: 2869: 2852: 2272:

Thank you; I think your link for the second source is wrong though, but based on the quote I believe

2177: 2147: 1992:

Various UN monickers? You mean the High Commissioner for Human Rights? I said considerably more than

1923: 1898: 1851: 1820: 1764: 1481:

I just tried to follow the edits. @MVBW: the added portion is certainly not a reaction, as your edit

3264:

That is untrue, and anybody who reads any of the reports will see that is just a flat out mistruth.

1213: 734: 697: 639: 162:

https://www.timesofisrael.com/hamas-deputy-chief-lies-we-dont-target-civilians-we-only-attacked-idf/

3494: 3476: 3416: 3385: 3356: 3326: 3302: 3274: 3259: 3242: 3217: 3203: 3180: 3161: 3139: 3123: 3086: 3069: 2982: 2964: 2936: 2911: 2863: 2842: 2789: 2773: 2747: 2729: 2690: 2670: 2641: 2617: 2600: 2592: 2581: 2566: 2524: 2490: 2469: 2436: 2386: 2372:

later statements by special rapporteurs that the order evacuate northern Gaza is also a war crime (

2366: 2316: 2289: 2266: 2239: 2209: 2188: 2170: 2156: 2134: 2111: 2062: 2040: 2025: 2010: 1987: 1982: 1970: 1954: 1949: 1935: 1909: 1892: 1874: 1859: 1845: 1831: 1809: 1794: 1775: 1744: 1729: 1712: 1704: 1694: 1680: 1666: 1652: 1637: 1610: 1575: 1560: 1524: 1499: 1472: 1445: 1428: 1391: 1369: 1354: 1332: 1317: 1302: 1284: 1185: 1158: 1142: 1128: 1110: 1096: 1069: 1040: 1021: 995: 974: 956: 926: 909: 896: 879: 861: 844: 803: 779: 764: 760: 742: 724: 716: 705: 693: 669: 647: 643: 587: 568: 552: 451: 447: 437: 414: 368: 349: 254: 234: 229: 214: 194: 189: 178: 153: 2452: 1685:

Ok. Please add a picture of a dead baby by Hamas. Source: the daily telegraph (British newspaper)

3464: 3378: 3319: 3267: 3194: 3132: 3079: 2955: 2942: 2928: 2902: 2834: 2782: 2740: 2681: 2573: 2557: 2520: 2462: 2379: 2309: 2259: 2219:

appears to support the proposed wording in regards to Hamas but not Israel - about Hamas it says

2202: 2141: 2033: 2003: 1963: 1644: 1598: 1032: 1013: 987: 906: 888: 876: 818: 800: 580: 269: 169: 1398:

In addition, this page is not about prisoners, this is just one of many aspects of the invasion.

2507:"What the Israeli government is now doing, however, is replying to war crimes with war crimes." 2139:

I agree with you. "The United nations and human rights groups have...." reads better. Regards,

3157: 3119: 3065: 2769: 2725: 2666: 2658: 2637: 2613: 1801: 1700: 1602: 1265: 947:

I've heard of it in Iran International, About Dozens of Security Gaurds were killed by Hamas.

857: 840: 548: 266:

The views of the involved parties obviously merit mention, and this is indeed widely covered.

1786: 1273:

So I think its fair to say that the issue of Palestinian prisoners is relevant to this topic.

3408: 3057: 2804: 2796: 2754: 2709: 2482: 2162: 2126: 2103: 1883:

I mean he's right this isn't neutral. It is very biased in favor of Palestine. Just saying.

1676: 1551: 1436: 1419: 1293: 1275: 1176: 1060: 771: 405: 220: 205: 145: 138: 122: 3110:

Why should their views be prioritized over others? No one's suggesting removal in the body.

3015:"there have been widespread allegations of war crimes committed by participants in the war" 1378:. Yes, they stated it, but this does not belong to Background as something what had happen 1376:"Hamas stated that it had abducted Israelis to secure the freedom of Palestinian prisoners" 1341:. Yes, they stated it, but this does not belong to Background as something what had happen 1339:"Hamas stated that it had abducted Israelis to secure the freedom of Palestinian prisoners" 770:

Yea, whoever added the tag has to specify reasons for adding the tag in a discussion here.

755:

I can't find what it is related to since it has not been linked to a talk page discussion.

3238: 3213: 1530: 1506:

Hamas stated that it had abducted Israelis to secure the freedom of Palestinian prisoners.

901:

Removed the NPOV dispute template, which was asserted without evidence or explanation. -

851:

In particular, there may be a strong bias in favor of anti-Israeli voices in the conflict.

730: 712: 3433: 2513: 3148:

Aurel Sari isn't the only one with similar contentions, even within the article quoted.

2923:

I think people should familiarize themselves with what the UN source says. It's located

113:

Hamas claimed it did not deliberately target civilians, and things "went out of control"

3316:

saying that they deplore the violations of international law by both Hamas and Israel?

2884:. It seems to me that revert was against current talk page consensus. I have therefore 2808: 2716: 2629: 2373: 2294:

Several reliable sources have reported on the usage of white phosphorous munitions, eg

1977: 1944: 1781: 1486: 1459: 756: 443: 224: 200: 184: 3190: 3044: 3037: 3030: 2951: 2898: 2889: 2677: 2553: 2516: 2425:"clear evidence that war crimes may have been committed" by all sides to the conflict 1546: 902: 872: 828: 796: 433: 364: 165: 3153: 3115: 3061: 2881: 2765: 2721: 2662: 2654: 2633: 2609: 968: 920: 867: 853: 836: 787: 635: 544: 420:

I disagree. The sources cited and the content of that section discuss those topics

248: 2376:). And you seem to be ignoring the statements by the Human Rights Office as well. 1382:

the beginning of the events. Same with content of many other sources cited above.

1345:

the beginning of the events. Same with content of many other sources cited above.

914:

Removed another one within the analysis section, for a fairly neutral subsection.

2715:

Of course — there's the Israeli-Palestinian conflict background — so the obvious

2481:

in at one point but someone removed it, it is a biased source but green at RSP.

1672: 1542: 475:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1028: 1010: 692:" attacked the mosque in the photo. This is unsourced. Please add sources. See 3234: 3209: 2795:

No, but it privileges their viewpoint over others, which is why it would be a

887:, by an SPA IP that gained no traction. I'd delete it but am up against 1RR. 1101:

THEY Justified. Its the point (or one off) for crossing the strip to do so.

142: 1115:

No, I think that by making such large irrelevant subsection in this place,

1006:

https://www.jns.org/fatah-calls-on-the-palestinian-public-to-attack-israel/

2302:), and the Special Procedures link covers both the indiscriminate attacks 2092: 1541:

Secondly, roots of a conflict are always put in the background. Consider

426: 357: 183:

VR, what is your reason for wanting to add that? Is this widely reported?

965: 917: 245: 3451:. Also, intriguing articles are to be found by doing a web search for 3108:

it merely relays what the UN and various human rights groups have said

3310:

Experts say Hamas and Israel are committing war crimes in their fight

2225:

would amount to unlawful collective punishment, which is a war crime

3098:"there have been widespread allegations of war crimes committed by 3347:

according to RS you cited and others. That is they are not equal.

332: 116:. Israeli sources said that survivor testimonies belie this claim. 3129:

Special Rapporteurs (lots), compared to Aurel Sari's view (one).

1405:

The sources above do make the connection, but what is it exactly?

2646:

The suggested wording also strongly implies that groups such as

2572:

important. Wiki should respect that distinction in its article.

2351:

heinous violations of international law and international crimes

962:

Added Kerem Shalom by name under the first day of the timeline.

283:

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 October 2023 (5)

3335:

Which sources are you talking about? Certainly not thee source

2510:"It’s collective punishment, and these tactics are war crimes" 2215:

Can someone provide the sources supporting this? For example,

2196:

punishment), the sentence I would use would be something like

597: 454: 286: 25: 676:

Unsourced statement in an image caption in War Crimes section

866:

Ah, I see. You were doing a functional replacement, whereas

594:

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 October 2023

576:

including 260 people who were massacred at a music festival.

1400:" Shouldn't all major aspects of the invasion be discussed? 398:

The "Analysis" section should be integrated in "Background"

158:

Agree with the MOS:CLAIM comment, otherwise fine. Note also

3333:

lots of sources deny the idea that Hamas started anything.

110:

Would it be ok to add the following "War crimes" section:

2245:

HRW has said Israel has already committed war crimes, eg

2221:

amount to war crimes under international humanitarian law

105: 3424:

Sources need to be added to the sentence that ends with

2885: 2877: 2873: 1482: 1087:

section and therefore reads as anti-Israel propaganda.

1054: 885: 793: 3438:

What the Israeli government is now doing, however, is

2514:

https://www.hrw.org/the-day-in-human-rights/2023/10/12

2392:

Sorry, can you clarify what you are referring to with

824:or lack the basis in systemic bias to not just use 326:In October 2023, the ICRC responded to the violent 2757:question, as there's no current obvious consensus. 680:An image caption in the War Crimes section says: 164:– might be a better reference than the live blog. 1414:the invasion, hence appropriate for "background". 729:Thanks. Please review the whole article for more 3000:How does everyone feel about changing it from: 2753:Yes, but promoting one view over another is a 2251:Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council 1780:And yet this all article completely lack's of 106:Adding Hamas' view to the "War crimes" section 3229:, with the wording currently in the article ( 2353:. Israel, however, it talks in the singular; 2339: 2329: 2087:Request for comment on war crime perpetrators 682: 8: 1029:https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/138185 1011:https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/138095 3291:Legality of the Russian invasion of Ukraine 1921: 943:Palestinians Attack the Shalom Checkpoint. 3233:), per the discussions on sourcing above 3152:. We can wait for a consensus to emerge. 2701:that this isn't the predominant viewpoint 2539:, though I have edited the article before 2394:the statements by the Human Rights Office 751:What is the neutrality dispute regarding? 3453:"human rights groups critical of israel" 1817:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Words to watch 1590:This article is completely pro-palestine 711:I've removed the second sentence due to 3457:an article from John Hopkins University 3342:. It does say that Hamas was guilty of 2421:a U.N. -appointed Commission of Inquiry 1630:2A0D:6FC2:4110:6700:C088:4426:FBA6:11B2 1083:. In brief, this is hardly relevant in 379: 342:2A02:AA14:C482:A980:3DA6:26E0:283D:B18F 3440:replying to war crimes with war crimes 3230: 3107: 3097: 3014: 3004: 2894: 2800: 2761: 2704: 2549: 2424: 2420: 2413: 2407: 2400: 2393: 2354: 2350: 2224: 2220: 1838:2600:1017:A00A:722:1558:DD7C:A4FE:D4E7 1687:2A0D:6FC2:4110:6700:244C:BF4:C802:D26E 1659:2A0D:6FC2:4110:6700:8437:EE5:FB03:6FC9 1404: 1397: 850: 813: 473:Do not edit the contents of this page. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2055:2001:14BB:AB:3B33:F980:F6C2:8B34:99DD 1722:2001:14BB:AB:3B33:F980:F6C2:8B34:99DD 7: 2945:Thanks. I don't think that it was a 2455:heads the UN Human Rights Office as 2443:Re Human Rights Office, its covered 1618:The following discussion is closed. 2336:While in regards to Israel it says: 2018:2601:40:C481:A940:9D32:3F:E894:5BA3 1920:claims to have seen the pictures? 1885:2601:40:C481:A940:9D32:3F:E894:5BA3 2760:I'd be okay with wording such as: 2457:High Commissioner for Human Rights 2095:: Lede is a summary of the body)? 24: 3096:Then "all" could be added to it: 2606:Oppose in lead, okay with in body 2591:with modified wording per above. 1504:The text includes the following: 3314:the Special Procedures statement 2280:best wording for this would be? 2078:The discussion above is closed. 1081:section about prisoners exchange 654: 601: 458: 290: 29: 1761:Knowledge:Neutral point of view 389:ICRC.org. Accessed 12 Oct 2023. 3005:Many allegations of war crimes 2803:would be totally in line with 2349:Hamas it talks in the plural; 884:I think this was referring to 812:because it's up for deletion. 338:international humanitarian law 1: 3104:. I would be happy with that. 2993:Support Compromise suggestion 3495:19:50, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 3477:19:27, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 3417:12:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 3386:02:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC) 3357:02:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC) 3327:01:40, 16 October 2023 (UTC) 3303:01:22, 16 October 2023 (UTC) 3275:15:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 3260:12:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 3243:10:50, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 3218:10:25, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 3204:08:37, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 3181:09:40, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 3162:04:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 3140:03:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 3124:03:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 3087:02:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 3070:02:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 2983:09:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 2965:08:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 2937:08:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 2912:08:34, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 2864:00:25, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 2843:20:16, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2790:02:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 2774:02:42, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 2748:21:12, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2730:19:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2691:18:55, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2671:18:52, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2653:been accused of war crimes. 2642:18:33, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2618:18:30, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2601:18:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2582:08:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 2567:17:08, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2525:14:57, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2491:16:20, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2470:20:03, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2437:16:09, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2387:15:52, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2367:15:32, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2317:15:16, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2290:15:09, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2267:14:55, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2240:14:42, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2210:14:37, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2189:15:21, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 2171:14:57, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 2157:14:42, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 2135:14:05, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 2112:12:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 2063:18:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 2041:15:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2026:10:08, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2011:20:40, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 1988:20:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 1971:20:35, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 1955:20:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 1936:19:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 1910:10:45, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 1893:10:06, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 1875:17:05, 16 October 2023 (UTC) 1860:12:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC) 1846:11:30, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 1832:05:10, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 1810:01:20, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 1795:19:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 1776:02:01, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 1745:02:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC) 1730:17:27, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 1713:19:21, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 1695:05:37, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 1681:23:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 1667:20:27, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 1653:16:30, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 1638:16:09, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 1611:18:54, 16 October 2023 (UTC) 1576:22:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 1561:00:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 1525:15:36, 11 October 2023 (UTC) 1500:06:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC) 1473:05:58, 11 October 2023 (UTC) 1446:02:01, 11 October 2023 (UTC) 1429:00:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC) 1392:22:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC) 1370:20:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC) 1355:22:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC) 1333:20:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC) 1318:20:08, 10 October 2023 (UTC) 1303:15:29, 10 October 2023 (UTC) 1285:12:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC) 1186:12:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC) 1159:02:14, 10 October 2023 (UTC) 1041:23:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 1022:20:37, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 996:20:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 975:21:25, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 957:19:49, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 927:21:25, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 910:19:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 897:19:48, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 880:19:39, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 862:19:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 845:19:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 804:19:30, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 780:19:12, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 765:19:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 743:16:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 725:16:30, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 706:16:26, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 670:23:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 648:14:05, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 588:15:00, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 569:12:39, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 553:07:00, 15 October 2023 (UTC) 452:06:35, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 438:20:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 415:20:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 369:20:37, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 350:20:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 277:22:26, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 255:21:25, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 235:20:28, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 215:19:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 195:19:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 179:18:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 154:17:50, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 132:17:29, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 2223:, but about Israel it says 1143:23:54, 9 October 2023 (UTC) 1129:23:52, 9 October 2023 (UTC) 1111:23:40, 9 October 2023 (UTC) 1097:23:33, 9 October 2023 (UTC) 1070:21:42, 9 October 2023 (UTC) 628:to reactivate your request. 616:has been answered. Set the 317:to reactivate your request. 305:has been answered. Set the 3513: 3430:UN independent expert link 539:Massacre removed from lead 2648:Palestinian Islamic Jihad 3443:, their emphasis. Also, 3102:participants in the war" 2080:Please do not modify it. 1699:If the photo is under a 1620:Please do not modify it. 1547:2014 Gaza War#Background 688:It implies that Israel " 3436:that specifically says 2626:not a present consensus 1049:Background on prisoners 3018: 3008: 2451:(among other places). 2346: 2333: 1543:Six-Day War#Background 810:Template:Systemic bias 686: 355:What is your request? 3445:Amnesty International 3012: 3002: 981:Response in Palestine 733:concerns. Bless you. 614:2023 Israel–Hamas war 471:of past discussions. 328:2023 Israel-Hamas war 323:Humanitarian efforts 303:2023 Israel–Hamas war 223:for the article text. 42:of past discussions. 18:Talk:Israel–Hamas war 3020:That's my proposal. 849:Old template stated 792:should answer this. 574:Um its in the lead? 3349:My very best wishes 3295:My very best wishes 3252:My very best wishes 2708:It's a question of 1996:, I then explained 1568:My very best wishes 1517:My very best wishes 1384:My very best wishes 1362:My very best wishes 1347:My very best wishes 1325:My very best wishes 1310:My very best wishes 1166:My very best wishes 1151:My very best wishes 1121:My very best wishes 1089:My very best wishes 2764:. Does that work? 2276:is the right link. 1701:compatible license 1621: 3388: 3329: 3277: 3202: 3142: 3089: 2963: 2910: 2792: 2750: 2689: 2565: 2540: 2537: 2472: 2389: 2319: 2269: 2212: 2143:✠ Robertus Pius ✠ 2043: 2013: 1973: 1938: 1926:comment added by 1619: 1266:Mustafa Barghouti 632: 631: 590: 536: 535: 483: 482: 477:current talk page 321: 320: 279: 177: 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3504: 3492: 3486: 3475: 3473: 3467: 3381: 3376: 3322: 3317: 3270: 3265: 3197: 3193: 3178: 3172: 3135: 3130: 3082: 3077: 3055: 3048: 3041: 3034: 3027: 2980: 2974: 2958: 2954: 2905: 2901: 2861: 2855: 2833:as per Andreas. 2785: 2780: 2743: 2738: 2684: 2680: 2560: 2556: 2546:UN press release 2538: 2531: 2465: 2460: 2382: 2377: 2312: 2307: 2262: 2257: 2205: 2200: 2186: 2180: 2144: 2036: 2031: 2006: 2001: 2000:it is nonsense. 1966: 1961: 1907: 1901: 1829: 1823: 1773: 1767: 1497: 1496: 1493: 1490: 1470: 1469: 1466: 1463: 1169: 973: 971: 925: 923: 833: 827: 823: 817: 808:Replacement the 791: 668: 666:Compassionate727 662: 658: 657: 623: 619: 605: 604: 598: 583: 578: 514: 489: 488: 462: 461: 455: 431: 390: 384: 362: 312: 308: 294: 293: 287: 272: 267: 253: 251: 241:Economist, 10/10 221:due significance 172: 168: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3512: 3511: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3490: 3485:entropyandvodka 3484: 3471: 3465: 3463: 3379: 3320: 3268: 3195: 3176: 3171:entropyandvodka 3170: 3150:not a newspaper 3133: 3080: 3049: 3042: 3035: 3028: 3024:Entropyandvodka 3021: 2978: 2973:entropyandvodka 2972: 2956: 2903: 2870:Entropyandvodka 2859: 2854:entropyandvodka 2853: 2783: 2741: 2712:in the article. 2682: 2558: 2534:Summoned by bot 2463: 2380: 2310: 2296:Washington Post 2260: 2217:HRW's statement 2203: 2184: 2179:entropyandvodka 2178: 2142: 2119: 2089: 2084: 2083: 2034: 2004: 1994:that's nonsense 1964: 1905: 1900:entropyandvodka 1899: 1867:RealNuclearFish 1827: 1822:entropyandvodka 1821: 1771: 1766:entropyandvodka 1765: 1624: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1592: 1559: 1531:Washington Post 1494: 1491: 1488: 1487: 1467: 1464: 1461: 1460: 1444: 1427: 1301: 1283: 1256:Middle East Eye 1226:Washington Post 1184: 1163: 1077:in "Background" 1068: 1051: 983: 969: 963: 945: 921: 915: 831: 825: 821: 815: 785: 753: 678: 663: 655: 653: 621: 617: 602: 596: 581: 561:Codenamephoenix 541: 510: 459: 436: 427: 413: 400: 395: 394: 393: 385: 381: 367: 358: 310: 306: 291: 285: 270: 249: 243: 213: 170: 130: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3510: 3508: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3419: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3339:just provided 3281: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3245: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3146: 3111: 3105: 3091: 3090: 2995: 2994: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2845: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2758: 2713: 2697:The Economist 2673: 2621: 2620: 2603: 2593:ARandomName123 2586: 2585: 2584: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2511: 2508: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2419:Assuming that 2417: 2410: 2403: 2397: 2347: 2337: 2334: 2327: 2324: 2277: 2213: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2173: 2159: 2118: 2115: 2088: 2085: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2050: 2047: 2044: 1928:95.149.166.229 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1862: 1834: 1812: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1737:1992HondaCivic 1718: 1715: 1705:ARandomName123 1625: 1616: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1591: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1555: 1539: 1476: 1475: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1440: 1423: 1415: 1408: 1401: 1372: 1357: 1335: 1320: 1297: 1279: 1271: 1270: 1259: 1253: 1247: 1241: 1235: 1229: 1223: 1217: 1211: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1180: 1172:WP:NOTCENSORED 1064: 1050: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1008: 1003: 982: 979: 978: 977: 944: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 929: 847: 782: 752: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 717:ARandomName123 677: 674: 673: 672: 630: 629: 606: 595: 592: 572: 571: 540: 537: 534: 533: 528: 525: 520: 515: 508: 503: 498: 495: 487: 486: 485: 484: 481: 480: 463: 425: 409: 399: 396: 392: 391: 378: 377: 373: 372: 371: 356: 319: 318: 295: 284: 281: 264: 263: 262: 261: 260: 259: 258: 257: 209: 181: 159: 156: 126: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3509: 3496: 3493: 3487: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3474: 3468: 3462: 3459:reminding us 3458: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3441: 3435: 3431: 3427: 3423: 3420: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3406: 3403: 3402: 3389: 3387: 3383: 3382: 3375: 3370: 3366: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3354: 3350: 3345: 3344:intentionally 3341: 3338: 3334: 3331: 3330: 3328: 3324: 3323: 3315: 3311: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3300: 3296: 3292: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3276: 3272: 3271: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3257: 3253: 3249: 3246: 3244: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3228: 3225: 3224: 3219: 3215: 3211: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3201: 3198: 3192: 3188: 3182: 3179: 3173: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3144: 3143: 3141: 3137: 3136: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3112: 3109: 3106: 3103: 3101: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3083: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3067: 3063: 3059: 3053: 3046: 3039: 3032: 3025: 3017: 3016: 3011: 3007: 3006: 3001: 2998: 2992: 2991: 2984: 2981: 2975: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2962: 2959: 2953: 2948: 2944: 2943:Alcibiades979 2940: 2939: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2929:Alcibiades979 2926: 2922: 2919: 2918: 2913: 2909: 2906: 2900: 2896: 2891: 2890:User:Nableezy 2887: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2862: 2856: 2849: 2846: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2829: 2828: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2793: 2791: 2787: 2786: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2756: 2752: 2751: 2749: 2745: 2744: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2718: 2714: 2711: 2707: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2688: 2685: 2679: 2674: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2649: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2622: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2604: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2574:Alcibiades979 2570: 2569: 2568: 2564: 2561: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2535: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2515: 2512: 2509: 2506: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2471: 2467: 2466: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2415: 2411: 2409: 2404: 2402: 2398: 2395: 2391: 2390: 2388: 2384: 2383: 2375: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2345: 2342: 2338: 2335: 2332: 2328: 2325: 2323:have used it. 2321: 2320: 2318: 2314: 2313: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2278: 2275: 2271: 2270: 2268: 2264: 2263: 2256: 2252: 2249:, as has the 2248: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2211: 2207: 2206: 2199: 2194: 2190: 2187: 2181: 2174: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2158: 2155: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2121: 2120: 2116: 2114: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2096: 2094: 2086: 2081: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2051: 2048: 2045: 2042: 2038: 2037: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2014: 2012: 2008: 2007: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1986: 1985: 1981: 1980: 1975: 1974: 1972: 1968: 1967: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1953: 1952: 1948: 1947: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1911: 1908: 1902: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1863: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1833: 1830: 1824: 1818: 1813: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1783: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1774: 1768: 1762: 1758: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1716: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1623: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1589: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1553: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1498: 1484: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1474: 1471: 1457: 1456: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1438: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1421: 1416: 1413: 1409: 1406: 1402: 1399: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1358: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1321: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1295: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1277: 1267: 1263: 1260: 1257: 1254: 1251: 1248: 1245: 1242: 1239: 1236: 1233: 1230: 1227: 1224: 1221: 1220:The Economist 1218: 1215: 1212: 1209: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1178: 1173: 1167: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1062: 1056: 1048: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1033:Daydreamdays2 1030: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1014:Daydreamdays2 1012: 1009: 1007: 1004: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 993: 989: 988:Daydreamdays2 980: 976: 972: 967: 961: 960: 959: 958: 954: 950: 942: 928: 924: 919: 913: 912: 911: 908: 904: 900: 899: 898: 894: 890: 886: 883: 882: 881: 878: 874: 869: 865: 864: 863: 859: 855: 852: 848: 846: 842: 838: 835: 830: 820: 811: 807: 806: 805: 802: 798: 794: 789: 783: 781: 777: 773: 769: 768: 767: 766: 762: 758: 750: 744: 740: 736: 732: 728: 727: 726: 722: 718: 714: 710: 709: 708: 707: 703: 699: 695: 691: 690:intentionally 685: 681: 675: 671: 667: 661: 652: 651: 650: 649: 645: 641: 637: 627: 624:parameter to 615: 611: 607: 600: 599: 593: 591: 589: 585: 584: 577: 570: 566: 562: 557: 556: 555: 554: 550: 546: 538: 532: 529: 526: 524: 521: 519: 516: 513: 509: 507: 504: 502: 499: 496: 494: 491: 490: 478: 474: 470: 469: 464: 457: 456: 453: 449: 445: 441: 440: 439: 435: 432: 430: 423: 419: 418: 417: 416: 412: 408: 407: 397: 388: 383: 380: 376: 370: 366: 363: 361: 354: 353: 352: 351: 347: 343: 339: 334: 329: 324: 316: 313:parameter to 304: 300: 296: 289: 288: 282: 280: 278: 274: 273: 256: 252: 247: 242: 238: 237: 236: 233: 232: 228: 227: 222: 218: 217: 216: 212: 208: 207: 202: 199:My reason is 198: 197: 196: 193: 192: 188: 187: 182: 180: 176: 173: 167: 163: 160: 157: 155: 151: 147: 144: 140: 136: 135: 134: 133: 129: 125: 124: 119: 118: 115: 111: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3460: 3448: 3439: 3437: 3425: 3421: 3404: 3377: 3372: 3371: 3368: 3363: 3343: 3336: 3332: 3318: 3266: 3247: 3226: 3131: 3099: 3078: 3052:BilledMammal 3019: 3013: 3009: 3003: 2999: 2996: 2946: 2920: 2882:User:KlayCax 2847: 2830: 2781: 2739: 2696: 2650: 2605: 2588: 2541: 2479:this article 2461: 2429:BilledMammal 2378: 2359:BilledMammal 2343: 2340: 2330: 2308: 2303: 2282:BilledMammal 2258: 2254: 2232:BilledMammal 2228: 2201: 2197: 2140: 2122: 2099: 2097: 2090: 2079: 2032: 2002: 1997: 1993: 1983: 1978: 1962: 1950: 1945: 1922:— Preceding 1918: 1802:Jamesiepoo88 1626: 1617: 1603:Hemiauchenia 1601:violations. 1550: 1509: 1505: 1435: 1418: 1411: 1379: 1375: 1342: 1338: 1292: 1274: 1272: 1202: 1175: 1135:37.252.92.97 1116: 1103:37.252.92.97 1084: 1080: 1076: 1059: 1052: 984: 946: 754: 694:WP:UNSOURCED 689: 687: 683: 679: 659: 636:MOS:RECENTLY 633: 625: 610:edit request 579: 575: 573: 542: 511: 472: 466: 428: 421: 404: 401: 382: 374: 359: 325: 322: 314: 299:edit request 268: 265: 230: 225: 204: 190: 185: 121: 120: 112: 109: 78: 43: 37: 3447:has stated 3409:Selfstudier 2835:O3000, Ret. 2483:Selfstudier 2477:I did put 2355:a war crime 2163:Makeandtoss 2127:Selfstudier 2104:Makeandtoss 1645:O3000, Ret. 1599:WP:NOTFORUM 1512:the attack 1291:terrorists. 949:Miniuristic 889:O3000, Ret. 784:The editor 772:Selfstudier 465:This is an 403:background. 146:Parham wiki 139:Vice regent 36:This is an 3455:including 3058:WP: Weight 2886:reinserted 2805:WP: Weight 2797:WP: Weight 2755:WP: Weight 2710:WP: Weight 2117:Discussion 1852:Nohjmich17 1535:points out 1208:Al Jazeera 715:concerns. 618:|answered= 531:Archive 20 523:Archive 18 518:Archive 17 512:Archive 16 506:Archive 15 501:Archive 14 493:Archive 10 375:References 307:|answered= 98:Archive 20 90:Archive 18 85:Archive 17 79:Archive 16 73:Archive 15 68:Archive 14 60:Archive 10 2897:Regards, 2253:, saying 1979:SPECIFICO 1946:SPECIFICO 819:globalize 757:Ecrusized 735:Daffd2222 698:Daffd2222 640:Seffardim 444:Bobisland 226:SPECIFICO 186:SPECIFICO 143:MOS:CLAIM 3434:HRW link 3432:and the 3380:nableezy 3321:nableezy 3293:, etc. 3269:nableezy 3134:nableezy 3081:nableezy 3045:Jayen466 3038:Andrevan 3031:Nableezy 2878:reverted 2809:WP: NPOV 2784:nableezy 2742:nableezy 2720:notion. 2717:WP: NPOV 2630:WP: NPOV 2624:There's 2517:FunLater 2464:nableezy 2381:nableezy 2311:nableezy 2300:see here 2261:nableezy 2204:nableezy 2161:Agreed. 2152:Contribs 2093:MOS:LEDE 2035:nableezy 2005:nableezy 1965:nableezy 1924:unsigned 1374:It says: 1337:It says: 1262:ABC News 1250:NY Times 1244:Al-Ahram 1232:BBC News 1214:CBC News 903:Fuzheado 873:Fuzheado 797:Fuzheado 731:WP:SYNTH 713:WP:SYNTH 582:nableezy 271:nableezy 3422:Support 3405:Support 3227:Support 3208:Agree. 3191:Andreas 3154:KlayCax 3116:KlayCax 3062:KlayCax 2952:Andreas 2921:Comment 2899:Andreas 2848:Comment 2831:Support 2799:issue. 2766:KlayCax 2722:KlayCax 2678:Andreas 2663:KlayCax 2655:KlayCax 2651:haven't 2634:KlayCax 2632:views. 2610:KlayCax 2589:Support 2554:Andreas 2542:Support 2123:Comment 1782:WP:NPOV 1495:hossein 1483:implies 1468:hossein 1238:Reuters 1002:search: 868:KlayCax 854:Thrakkx 837:Thrakkx 788:Thrakkx 545:KlayCax 468:archive 201:WP:NPOV 166:Andreas 39:archive 3248:Oppose 2947:strong 2874:change 2374:source 1673:Drmies 1412:before 3472:Peter 3466:Ender 3374:said. 3365:said. 3235:DFlhb 3210:DFlhb 3010:to: 2872:Your 2699:says 1510:after 1380:after 1343:after 1264:: "[ 1055:added 622:|ans= 608:This 422:after 333:Hamas 311:|ans= 297:This 16:< 3491:talk 3469:and 3413:talk 3367:and 3353:talk 3299:talk 3256:talk 3239:talk 3214:talk 3177:talk 3158:talk 3120:talk 3066:talk 2979:talk 2933:talk 2925:here 2876:was 2860:talk 2839:talk 2807:and 2770:talk 2726:talk 2667:talk 2659:talk 2638:talk 2614:talk 2597:talk 2578:talk 2521:talk 2487:talk 2453:Türk 2449:here 2447:and 2445:here 2433:talk 2363:talk 2286:talk 2274:this 2247:here 2236:talk 2185:talk 2167:talk 2148:Talk 2131:talk 2108:talk 2059:talk 2022:talk 1984:talk 1951:talk 1932:talk 1906:talk 1889:talk 1871:talk 1856:talk 1842:talk 1828:talk 1806:talk 1791:talk 1772:talk 1741:talk 1726:talk 1709:talk 1691:talk 1677:talk 1663:talk 1649:talk 1634:talk 1607:talk 1572:talk 1557:talk 1521:talk 1442:talk 1434:war. 1425:talk 1388:talk 1366:talk 1351:talk 1329:talk 1314:talk 1299:talk 1281:talk 1182:talk 1155:talk 1139:talk 1125:talk 1107:talk 1093:talk 1085:that 1066:talk 1037:talk 1018:talk 992:talk 953:talk 907:Talk 893:talk 877:Talk 858:talk 841:talk 829:NPOV 801:Talk 776:talk 761:talk 739:talk 721:talk 702:talk 660:Done 644:talk 565:talk 549:talk 448:talk 411:talk 346:talk 231:talk 211:talk 191:talk 150:talk 141:See 128:talk 3337:you 3200:466 3100:all 2961:466 2908:466 2880:by 2687:466 2599:) 2563:466 2304:and 1998:why 1787:dov 1711:) 1545:or 723:) 620:or 612:to 429:Yue 360:Yue 309:or 301:to 175:466 3488:| 3415:) 3384:- 3355:) 3325:- 3301:) 3273:- 3258:) 3241:) 3216:) 3196:JN 3174:| 3160:) 3138:- 3122:) 3085:- 3068:) 2976:| 2957:JN 2935:) 2904:JN 2857:| 2841:) 2788:- 2772:) 2746:- 2728:) 2703:: 2683:JN 2669:) 2661:) 2640:) 2616:) 2580:) 2559:JN 2552:-- 2548:: 2523:) 2489:) 2468:- 2459:. 2435:) 2427:. 2385:- 2365:) 2357:. 2315:- 2288:) 2265:- 2238:) 2208:- 2182:| 2169:) 2150:• 2133:) 2110:) 2102:" 2061:) 2039:- 2024:) 2009:- 1969:- 1934:) 1903:| 1891:) 1873:) 1858:) 1844:) 1825:| 1808:) 1793:) 1769:| 1763:. 1743:) 1728:) 1717:Hi 1693:) 1679:) 1665:) 1651:) 1636:) 1609:) 1574:) 1552:VR 1523:) 1437:VR 1420:VR 1390:) 1368:) 1353:) 1331:) 1316:) 1294:VR 1276:VR 1177:VR 1157:) 1141:) 1127:) 1117:we 1109:) 1095:) 1061:VR 1053:I 1039:) 1031:. 1020:) 994:) 966:SJ 964:– 955:) 918:SJ 916:– 905:| 895:) 875:| 860:) 843:) 832:}} 826:{{ 822:}} 816:{{ 799:| 795:- 778:) 763:) 741:) 704:) 696:. 646:) 638:. 626:no 586:- 567:) 551:) 527:→ 497:← 450:) 434:🌙 406:VR 365:🌙 348:) 315:no 275:- 246:SJ 244:– 206:VR 171:JN 152:) 123:VR 94:→ 64:← 3411:( 3351:( 3297:( 3254:( 3237:( 3212:( 3156:( 3118:( 3064:( 3054:: 3050:@ 3047:: 3043:@ 3040:: 3036:@ 3033:: 3029:@ 3026:: 3022:@ 2941:@ 2931:( 2868:@ 2837:( 2768:( 2724:( 2665:( 2657:( 2636:( 2612:( 2595:( 2576:( 2536:) 2532:( 2519:( 2485:( 2431:( 2396:? 2361:( 2284:( 2234:( 2227:. 2165:( 2154:) 2146:( 2129:( 2106:( 2098:" 2057:( 2020:( 1930:( 1887:( 1869:( 1854:( 1840:( 1804:( 1789:( 1739:( 1724:( 1707:( 1689:( 1675:( 1661:( 1647:( 1632:( 1605:( 1570:( 1533:[ 1519:( 1492:h 1489:M 1465:h 1462:M 1403:" 1396:" 1386:( 1364:( 1349:( 1327:( 1312:( 1269:" 1168:: 1164:@ 1153:( 1137:( 1123:( 1105:( 1091:( 1035:( 1016:( 990:( 970:+ 951:( 922:+ 891:( 856:( 839:( 834:. 790:: 786:@ 774:( 759:( 737:( 719:( 700:( 664:— 642:( 563:( 547:( 479:. 446:( 344:( 250:+ 148:( 137:@ 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index