2624:
inclusion of pseudoscientific views should not give them undue weight. The pseudoscientific view should be clearly described as such. An explanation of how scientists have reacted to pseudoscientific theories should be prominently included. This helps us to describe differing views fairly. This also applies to other fringe subjects, for instance, forms of historical revisionism that are considered by more reliable sources to either lack evidence or actively ignore evidence, such as claims that Pope John Paul I was murdered, or that the Apollo moon landing was faked.
1915:
word copied the original text here, which seems to be circular reporting. On
Knowledge articles project-wide, there is general consensus against including every wild claim made a person, unless there is some sense they are DUE (notable) or real. Here in particular it's a problem, as it seems Shamir edited into the article himself when he wrote it, and sourced to a website which is full of the wildest claims imaginable and fringe conspiracy theories. As for the discussion in general, if we can't resolve it, I guess we'll have to make a RFC about it later?
1375:, then surely it requires us to say that it is notable (that they are perhaps statements from a important primary source). However, where is the evidence these claims are notable? They seem to be just claims from his personal website. Moreover, searching in Hebrew, there is no mention of any of these claims (so it really seems like we are just reprinting random, self-promotional claims from the website here, without WP:RS, notability or secondary coverage, and with the knowledge that it is an unreliable source).
3008:"ืืื ืืืงืจ ืืช ืืื, ื ืืืฅ ืืฉืจืื ืฉืืืจ ืืืฆืืช ืืช ืืงื ืืืจืืง. ืืืื ืืื ืขืืฉื ืืืช. ืืคืืฉ ืืืืจ. ืืื ืคืขืืื ื"ืืืืืช" - ืืื ืืคืืฅ ืชืขืืืื ืื ืืืฉืืืช. "ืื ื ืฉืืืืช ืืชื ืืขืช 'ืืืืืช' ืืืื ืืงืืชื", ืืืืจืช ืืกืชืจ ืฉืืจืืจ-ืืืืืืกืงื. "ืื ื ืืชื ืืืช. ืืขื ืืื ืฉื ืืฉืจืื ืงืฉื ืื. ืืชืืจ ืืื, ืื ื ืืขืืืคื ืื ืืืืกืืฃ. ืืื ืงืืื ืืื ืื ืฆืืื ื. ืืื ืืื ืคืขืื ืฆืืื ื. ืขืฉื ืืืจืื ืืืืืื. ืืืื ืืืื ืื ืื ืฉืงืจื ืื. ืืืืชื ืจืืฆื ืืืืื ืืขืฆืื. ืื ื ืืืฉืืช ืฉืื ืืืื. ืืขืฆื ืื ืืืื ื ืคืฉืืช. ืืื ื ืจืื ืฉืคืื. ืืื ืื ืืืคืจืข. ืืื ืืืืื ืืื. ืืื ืืฉืื ืื ืืจืื". ืืื ืืืืจืช ืขื ืกืฃ ืืื."
957:
936:
2137:(judgement, theory or assessment of quality). The inclusion or exclusion of facts from an article can be done selectively to promote or undermine a POV (opinion etc). The material in question does not appear to promote or undermine a POV - except perhaps that it is "self promotional". However, that it is "self promotional" is not an arguement made in comments herein. I conclude that the cited policy links are not pertinent to determining the matter.
1702:(especially considering their origin). The question is whether it is DUE to include the claims here. Is there any evidence these have any notability, beyond being sentences written on his website (that he used to cite himself for this article)? Unless there is any actual source for these claims, they are clearly fringe claims with no evidence for them, which are UNDUE and originate from his own self-sourcing and self-editing of this article.
1188:
2307:- That Shamir claims to have been a paratrooper is reliably sourced to multiple secondary sources. They are not presented as anything more than the claims of Shamir. The article does not present anything that is not in dispute in any way, Shamir in fact does claim such and such about himself and those claims have been noted by sources that cover him. The arguments to remove have been based on nothing resembling any Knowledge policy.
21:
643:
622:
265:
1045:
653:
152:
131:
866:
848:
764:
743:
162:
2486:. In particular, the relative space that an article devotes to different aspects of a fringe theory should follow from consideration primarily of the independent sources. Points that are not discussed in independent sources should not be given any space in articles. Independent sources are also necessary to determine the relationship of a fringe theory to mainstream scholarly discourse.
774:
967:
100:
1874:
claim is prima facie absurd, and the other paratroopers would know him, while he has more or less zero trace of any life in Israel beyond the
Knowledge article he wrote, or had written, in several languages). So the issue is whether it is DUE or not to include his personal claims, that he added to this article for self-promotion, and sourced to a personal website.
2053:
of the sources I have been directed to by this discussion question the credibility, though one of these does so by a quote attributed to a third party. The comment by that party is not well substantiated. "Life history" from the sources (save one) is attributed to Shamir and his web page - two explicitly citing the web page as the source, while the
876:
1797:. The citations here are to the Times of Israel and to Tablet. Are you seriously challenging either of those as reliable sources? They consider his website relevant to provide information about Shamir. They also see the need to explicitly attribute it to Shamir's website. And while you are at it, please read
2843:
I dont really have a problem with most of what has been removed, but some of it is a problem, but Ill keep that discussion up a section. But beyond that, there are a number of substandard sources being used here to make fairly serious charges against Shamir. Regardless of what you think about Shamir,
1873:
There is no evidence Shamir was a paratrooper in
Paratrooper Brigade, or was a BBC journalist. These were simply inserted by himself into this article when he was editing it, and he linked to his own website. These are fringe claims (if he was a paratrooper, it would be easy to verify in Israel - the
1847:
And who said anything about ToI or Tablet "endorsing" anything? Nothing in FRIND supports your view on this, nothing says anything about a source needed to analyze what somebody says about themselves. Yall objected to citing Shamir directly, and even if that is a bit silly fine, that is no longer the
1653:
By analogy, this is the equivalent of if I was a fringe claimant known mainly for fabrications, writing my own
Knowledge article, which is sourced to my personal website - in which I said I dated some supermodels and was a Topgun fighter pilot - would there any reason it would be DUE for Knowledge to
3040:
It's not an op-ed - it looks like it is in a weekend supplement/magazine section - a multi-page feature (as opposed to dry reporting in the main section - which are are short and terse) - these sections often have first person reporting and anecdotes (and not all the piece in first person) - but are
2887:
Ben Dror 2003 is not an opinion piece AFAICT (reads as a full length feature, includes response by Shamir), and it is in Maariv - at the time a major newspaper (a decade+ later bought by Makor Rishon - which has the archive). Ball is in the Daily Beast, not the
Guardian. Brown, Guardian staff, would
2052:
I have considered the arguements made, the evidence presented and the relevant policies, guidelines and advice. This is a case where there is little to no "life history" on the subject that is independent of the subject. Furthermore, there appears to be reason to doubt the credibility of same. Three
1897:
the material is not sourced to his website, it is sourced to ToI and Tablet, and if you continue to refuse to acknowledge that what is in the article is reliably sourced to secondary sources then I dont see how we are supposed to agree on anything when we cant agree on what is indisputably factually
1888:
I dont know why you seem to be insisting on replying to an argument nobody is making. The article does not say he was a paratrooper. It does not say he worked for BBC. It does say that he says this about himself. And that is not sourced to his personal website. That is sourced to the Times of Israel
1832:
They are independent reliable sources - however all they say is that Shamir's website contains these claims - so yes, that passes V, however neither TOI nor Tablet endorse these claims. Per FRIND we should prefer a discussion analyzing Shamir's claims as opposed to merely quoting them. It is unclear
1675:
two different reliable sources have been provided that say Shamir says this about himself. The article reports it just as those reliable sources does. There is zero basis for the claim that Times of Israel or Tablet relied on
Knowledge in reporting that Shamir's website says this about Shamir, given
2627:
We discuss views that are not widely held when they are discussed in reliable sources and we clarify that they are not confirmed. That is exactly what is happening here. People making vague waves to policies that explicitly contradict their arguments would do well to read the policies they claim to
1914:
These are problematic claims which are prima facie highly improbable, whose origin is this website and likely this
Knowledge article itself, which Shamir originally wrote. The question is whether it is DUE to include these claims. That's not resolved simply because a TOI article has almost word for
1643:
who would be some kind of war hero in Israel, etc, we should expect there to be some evidence or source for this, for it to be DUE to reprint it in an encyclopedia. Simple circular reporting from the
Knowledge page, that Shamir originally wrote, and which was sourced to his personal website, is not
2538:
Ok, and so what they quote Shamir for this? That establishes weight. And notability, once again, has literally zero to do with the content of articles. Our article does not say anything those sources do not directly support, namely that Shamir says this about himself. Please stop making up policy,
1680:
that the article not include it. It has weight because reliable sources have given it weight. If you simply self-revert until tomorrow you are still edit-warring. And in doing so you would be removing multiple reliable sources. Please do not continue to try to force in your changes to this article
1436:
unless there is some indication that it not just false, trivia claims made for self-promotion on a personal website. In this case, these paragraphs in the article were originally written by Shamir himself when he was editing here (both with an account in his name and IPs which seem to overlap with
2745:
If people are going to make bald assertions about our policies or the sources that are flatly contradicted by what the policies or the sources say then that should be pointed out. You still have not retracted the claim that Shamir's personal website is a source used for this. That straightforward
2623:
Thus, when talking about pseudoscientific topics, we should not describe these two opposing viewpoints as being equal to each other. While pseudoscience may in some cases be significant to an article, it should not obfuscate the description of the mainstream views of the scientific community. Any
1929:
Again, you are answering arguments nobody has made and are wholly irrelevant. The material is not sourced to Shamir's website, it is sourced to the Times of Israel and to Tablet. DUE weight is determined by whether or not sources consider the material to have weight, and you have now two reliable
3093:
I realize that nobody wants to be seen as "defending" an antisemite or
Holocaust denier, but we still have to follow some basic standards here. The line from Dershowitz is accurate, but the context it is used for here is SYNTH, and the op-ed is about an entirely different subject (two academics
2934:
The
Socialist Viewpoint piece is quite definitely not an editorial. I can tell you, with absolute authority, that it was written as a letter from a reader who disagreed with the magazine's publication of articles by Shamir (subsequently removed), and was not originally intended for publication.
2815:
We can leave this open longer. So far it seems 5 editors including myself are against inclusion of the claims of Shamir's personal/website (or at least Aquillion says claims need adequate skepticism to be included), and 2 editors including Nabeezy are in favour of inclusion so long as it is not
1697:
They do not source the claims, but rather the fact they were published on his website. Shamir used his website to then write those claims on this Knowledge article originally. Years later, these have been reprinted with the exactly same wording as used in this article, as filler in TOI. This is
1626:
There's no reliable source for the claims, the source is rather mentioning his website again. The website itself was inserted into this article, which is the likely source for the article reporting itself. In other words, it is likely Knowledge now reporting on Knowledge (based on edits to this
2675:
Include ATTRIBUTED as his claim, obviously not in WP:VOICE. The entire 'backstory' is explicitly stated as being highly unreliable. The unreliability of the claims appears to be part of the story and character of the man. Why exclude these elements when everything else about the backstory is
1951:
The material is from Shamir's personal website statements, via this article, where Shamir introduced it. It was reprinted as circular reporting with identical wording, but there is no indication that it is WP:DUE. The fact the claims are highly fringe and backed by nothing contribute to the
1804:
The best sources to use when describing fringe theories, and in determining their notability and prominence, are independent reliable sources. In particular, the relative space that an article devotes to different aspects of a fringe theory should follow from consideration primarily of the
2766:. Our article was indeed using the website directly - and these citations have been replaced by secondary sourcing reporting on the website - attributing these bio details to Shamir, and not in their own voice. Sources preface this attribited reporting with doubt on details (e.g. JPost
1281:, Shamir can be used for statements about his own life. That they arent in any secondary source is reason to attribute it explicitly, but you are removing material that is explicitly allowed by policy and leaving zero information about Shamir's life in a supposed biography of Shamir.
2071:
There appears little or no dispute as to the questionable veracity of the "life history" published on the subject's web page. The question is whether to omit such questionable "facts" or report them in the subjects own voice - while also reporting the "opinions" that these are
2697:
given the weak sourcing and coverage (secondary sources do discuss it, but don't seem to give it much credence, which means it's not a very important part of his biography.) It could possibly be mentioned in the body using secondary sources, but that's a question for
2997:
There's little coverage in Hebrew (though the name makes this difficult). The only source (well - aside from a 1994 piece on Shamir's website in Hebrew) I see that treats this as factual (searching in Hebrew for "Israel Shamir"+Mapam (in two spelling variants)) -
1437:
it), and originate from a website which is not a reliable or verified source. Originally Shamir was editing/writing this article himself and he was making false claims back when he was editing this article (i.e. removing the fact he was a Swedish citizen)
1128:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not
1966:
Yes, you have said that same irrelevant nonsense repeatedly. It remains nonsense. The sources here are Times of Israel and Tablet. Not Shamir's website. DUE is shown by the citations to two reliable third party sources. Please actually read
1952:
discussion of whether it is DUE to include them, simply because they were written on his website, and then reprinted (including on here). IF there was some evidence for the claims themselves, they might be somehow notable enough to include.
419:
2458:
Concerns you never addressed and until now you were on record saying that was a reliable source. So its only a reliable source when its used for saying negative things about Shamir? Okay ... What personal attack? Saying that the claim that
1731:
Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represents all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable
3066:
I don't know whether the error was Yemini's own, or whether he was misinformed by Shamir; but this does raise serious question marks about the reliability of the article as a source for factual statements about Shamir's activity.
3094:
endorsing a book by Gilad Atzmon), and it doesnt really accurately portray what Shamir wrote. Theres plenty of accurate criticisms to include here, you dont need to include the edge out-of-context things to get the point across.
1934:
being challenged here is sourced to Shamir's personal website. Tablet and the Times of Israel are the sources, and if you would like to challenge their reliability then by all means do that. Would be interesting to watch.
2411:
says flat out as a fact that Shamir was in fact a paratrooper in Israel. The article doesnt even go that far, it only reports what ToI and Tablet report, and it does not use Shamir's website for those claims in any way.
2152:
and that the wp policy perspective has slightly altered on this. The addition of questionable material does not "improve" an article. However, that the material "is" questionable is of relevance. However, articles are a
2042:
As an initial comment, the OP refers to an exchange of posts but does not provide a link/diff for this. Even though it was the preceding discussion, it would have been nice to make this clear. Also, to the statement:
563:
2979:
That seems like something that should be more easily documented in Hebrew. Same for any actual employment by Haaretz. Is there any actual confirmation or denial of either of those facts that anybody can find?
2619:
says exactly the opposite. The sources consider Shamir's claims about his own life relevant to discussing him. It would be helpful if people stopped asserting policy and started quoting it. Here's a quote for
1720:. None of that is in dispute. Both the ToI and Tablet see fit to include that Shamir says this about himself. We are not reporting it as anything other than what Shamir says about himself. Your argument on
3041:
generally treated as secondary sources. While I strongly disagree with you this is an op-ed - I'm not particularly inclined to discuss this further (as I think there are sufficient sources without this).
2224:, as there is no evidence for these claims, as well as reason to doubt they are true, and they are made by a source known for unreliability and self-promotion, according to reliable sources. For example,
1852:
for what our article says (that Shamir says this about himself) have been provided. Multiple ones. And also, the source that youve argued is reliable and not editorial below (Yemini) seems to accept as
2555:
Interviews and/or website quotes are not independent. It is quite curious that while introducing these sources to replace the website you did not introduce what is independent of Shamir in them - e.g.
1581:
Including attacks on a living person based on editorials and removing the response should result in a BLP ban. Claiming that you are doing so with "reliable sources" should result in something wider.
2329:
as a source for Shamir claiming this. When sources discuss Shamir they include that he says this about himself and that there is no independent verification of it. That is exactly what is done here.
1654:
reprint these claims without evidence except that I added it to the article myself, and there was circular reprinting of that with wording which makes it likely it is copied from this very article?
2517:. Tablet is an independent reliable secondary source - however quotes of Shamir within the Tablet interview - are not independent of Shamir. Given that Tablet chose to preface those claims with
2651:, Knowledge should not be used to promote a professional antisemite and genocide denier's farcical (if not fantastical) claims about himself, claims for which no corroborating evidence exists.
429:
2176:). More generally, limited reliance should be placed on anything contained within the subject's web page unless same is independently confirmed (ie at arms length from the subject). Regards,
345:
1350:
Thats why we attribute it to him. The material, beyond being the only biographical detail we have at all in a supposed biography of a living person, is also quoted in secondary sources.
2373:. We should stick to sources that have investigated this themselves. Shamir's personal history is very much a matter of contention and we should avoid repeating possible fringe claims.
2539:
Tablet and ToI are in fact independent of Shamir and by their giving weight to Shamir's claims, as Shamir's claims, necessitates our giving weight to those claims, as claims, here.
2493:. Those are the sources here, not Shamir's website as you continue to portray. Whats it called when somebody says something that is flat out not true? Yeah, not a personal attack.
3024:
I think its an opinion piece because it opens with a personal anecdote. News articles dont generally talk about conversations the author had with a Palestinian friend of theirs.
2102:
Also as an aside, I would indicate that the sources that "report" the questionable veracity of the subjects "life history" are reasonably biased against the subject and fall to
1500:
I removed what was clearly a SPS. There is quite a bit of other content that should be examined carefully and possibly removed - the sourcing in this article is in a sad state.
1137:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
330:
2211:
inserted by an editor (Charles Godwin) who likely could be Shamir himself given the account's editing history, similarity to Shamir's writing style, and shared interest/views
446:
291:
79:
2148:(reading these short sections in full). The threshold for inclusion is that content is encyclopedic and improves an article. I note the difference between verifiability and
3144:
715:
531:
27:
1518:
and widespread non Op-ed coverage - for example, in news articles in the Guardian about Wikileaks. This is also DUE as it is almost the only coverage of him in WP:RS.
1322:
While some such use can be justified in most biographies if uncontroversial, in this case this may be controversial - particularly when we have this quote reported -
3129:
208:
1747:
to do with the content of articles. Not. One. Thing. And again, if you continue edit-warring it out then that is another problem beyond the poor content argument.
438:
360:
1639:
to report unverified claims from a personal website, and for which no evidence has been presented? If Shamir e.g. worked for the BBC, was a paratrooper in the
3119:
3010:(op-eds don't generally interview former politicians and the subject's mother (+ the subject himself at the bottom, and a bunch of other stuff) - do they?).
516:
84:
2702:, and it would be important to make the skepticism of the secondary sources clear rather than just trusting his self-description on his website directly. --
1543:
Yall are not allowed to turn this into the case against Israel Shamir. I am going to be restoring several parts of this and removing several parts of this.
1410:
And actually Icewhiz, I agree with removing his self-published views on other topics here (so long as you arent leaving an accusation unanswered as you are
3139:
1716:
What do you mean they do not source the claims? They say they are getting it from his website. They report it as the claims of his website. The claims are
1414:). But for material about himself he can be included. Obviously so as both the TOI and Tablet report his claims. Rendering moot that other claim about RS.
501:
285:
67:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
1607:
your edit is both unsupported by any policy (two reliable sources are cited reporting on Shamir's claims) and a violation of the 1RR. Please self-revert.
725:
480:
463:
2676:
questionable? Sources have reported these questionable claims and seemingly devoted more copy to them than to any 'reliable' accounts of his backstory.
2524:
should give us pause - and affect our presentation of this (if we are to present this at all - Shamir is notable for his writings - not his early life).
2369:- this is sourced to Shamir's website and secondary sources that say Shamir's website says this. As such, this is not independent of Shamir, and fails
2906:
The Yemini piece is written in the first person. Sorry for mixing up the publication on that. Im not removing Ball in the Daily Beast, I am removing
2047:
Only two sources have been mentioned to that point and only one hyperlinked. As a participant in the discussion, it is easy to "assume" such things.
1739:
weight from the sources to include it here. You are making up policy here. What it actually says supports the retention of the material. Please read
3159:
3124:
830:
820:
3179:
3169:
3149:
1023:
1013:
894:
687:
218:
59:
352:
2907:
2017:
RFC: should we include claims by Shamir that he was a paratrooper and worked for the BBC and Haaretz which originate from his personal website
1771:- quotes from the website are not independent of Shamir, particularly when the source merely quotes and does not analyze the claim (e.g. TOI).
3184:
2724:
2195:
Should we include claims by Shamir that he was a paratrooper and worked for the BBC and Haaretz, which originate from his personal website?
1833:
that Shamir's claims regarding his biography are due, and we should prefer sources analyzing the claims and/or reporting in their own voice.
3134:
898:
691:
1681:
through revert-warring, it is very expressly forbidden by policy and beyond that your argument simply does not stand up to any scrutiny.
3164:
455:
2848:
still applies to this and every other biography of a living person we have. I plan on removing the following, and what is cited to it:
2670:
2400:
1299:
902:
796:
2244:
3154:
2154:
989:
369:
184:
2428:
Please strike your personal attack. RolandR raised serious doubts in regards to the rather dated Maariv piece. ToI is reporting on
893:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
3174:
670:, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic
1454:
All material here needs a source other than Shamir - if have TOI or Tablet reporting something - then use them as a source. Per
889:
853:
683:
666:
627:
510:
496:
2289:
counter-argued that the text was likely directly from Shamir's website, and therefore wouldn't constitute circular reporting.
2656:
2025:
1889:
and Tablet. Reliable secondary sources cover Shamir's claims about himself. That makes it DUE weight to include those claims
3064:
1484:
somehow doesnt apply to you? Im taking this to BLPN and not AE just because Id like to maintain my sunny disposition today.
2834:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2768:"Shamir has a shadowy past and present that is hard to pin down or confirm. His official biography on his website says..."
2483:
2347:"Shamir has a shadowy past and present that is hard to pin down or confirm. His official biography on his website says..."
2267:
has discussed some of these claims, although in an article which was concluding that Shamir has invented his biography.)
1676:
the very obvious fact that Shamir's website does in fact say this about Shamir. You do not get to decide that because you
787:
748:
35:
2326:
2110:
expressed in a wiki voice - particularly as the objective basis for forming the opinion is not explicit in the articles.
1390:
Uh I just gave you two reliable sources, and notability has nothing to do with the content within articles. And, again,
1226:
1221:
1214:
1209:
1204:
1098:
1069:
1055:
980:
941:
523:
277:
175:
136:
111:
43:
1259:
415:
339:
1805:
independent sources. Points that are not discussed in independent sources should not be given any space in articles.
1169:
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!
988:-related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
795:-related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
3060:
1971:
as it does not support what you repeatedly claim it does. Everything else you have written is entirely irrelevant.
1157:
1094:
489:
379:
1059:
2652:
2396:
1698:
simply circular reporting whose origin is from Shamir himself, and not evidence that the claims are reliable or
1303:
1238:
2467:
sourced to Shamir's website and claiming that they are is designed to distort the record for other commenters.
322:
2440:. As such ToI and Tablet are merely reporting on what Shamir said - and cast doubt on what he says. UNDUE and
2055:
1326:
3059:). This is quite simply untrue, as can be easily found by looking at the list of candidates published by the
1563:
use here is not acceptable. We cover such subjects as they are covered by independent reliable sources - not
1140:
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
2181:
2158:
2145:
1627:
article made by Shamir adding them to Knowledge himself). There is a policy against this, as it seems to be
1121:
1073:
407:
314:
68:
2403:. Shamir's website is not cited and claims that it is are dishonest. Beyond that, you are fully aware that
1439:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Israel_Shamir&type=revision&diff=14921315&oldid=14921028
2076:
1149:
1086:
1930:
secondary sources cited for the material in the article. Please stop misrepresenting the situation here.
1097:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
3055:
I note that Yemini also claims that Shamir was a candidate for the Knesset for the Moked party in 1974 (
548:
472:
117:
2169:
2080:
1640:
78:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
2999:
2404:
2060:
99:
2707:
2603:
2173:
2096:
1768:
1455:
1391:
1329:
1278:
1153:
1090:
39:
183:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
3097:
3027:
2983:
2954:
2921:
2889:
2873:
2790:
2749:
2681:
2631:
2542:
2496:
2415:
2332:
2310:
2283:
2271:
2233:
2177:
2106:. As a BLP, it is therefore important to ensure the opinions of those sources are attributed and
1974:
1938:
1901:
1860:
1819:
1750:
1684:
1628:
1610:
1584:
1546:
1487:
1417:
1397:
1353:
1309:
1284:
1244:
1062:, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
679:
675:
671:
82:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
31:
2075:
The material is derived (directly or indirectly) from the subject's web page. The web page "is"
2045:
That Shamir claims to have been a paratrooper is reliably sourced to multiple secondary sources.
2764:"this is sourced to Shamir's website and secondary sources that say Shamir's website says this"
2226:
when Shamir was editing this article himself, he was removing the fact he was a Swedish citizen
3073:
3046:
3015:
2941:
2897:
2775:
2732:
2568:
2529:
2449:
2378:
2353:
2264:
1838:
1776:
1572:
1505:
1467:
1341:
395:
300:
2911:
2821:
2616:
2479:
2294:
2200:
2134:
2122:
2103:
1957:
1920:
1879:
1812:? Are you seriously saying that Shamir saying he was a paratrooper is not discussed in said
1707:
1659:
1564:
1523:
1445:
1380:
1240:
1187:
1148:
procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the
881:
658:
411:
1735:
This viewpoint has been published by reliable sources (multiple ones) and as such there is
2694:
2468:
2441:
2370:
2248:
2221:
2149:
2118:
1798:
1764:
1725:
1721:
1477:
1459:
1333:
1145:
583:
557:
391:
375:
75:
3057:ื-74' ืืื ืืื ืื ืืืขืื ืืื ืกืช ืืฉืืื ืืช, ืืืงืื ืื ืจืืืื, ืืจืฉืืืช "ืืืงื", ืฉืืจืืฉื ืขืื ืืืืจ ืคืขืื
2444:
concerns as well (as this is merely attributed reporting on what Shamir says if himself).
2746:
factually untrue claim is still being used to influence people commenting on the topic.
956:
935:
2703:
2599:
2141:
2130:
2069:
and would have facilitated discussion if a translation of the source had been provided.
1677:
779:
540:
264:
46:
exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
1480:
in an op-ed calling a living person an anti-semite but remove his response? You think
1079:
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
3113:
2845:
2699:
2677:
2260:
2255:, so, he argues this would fulfill the criteria for inclusion of the claims at least
2240:
2126:
2114:
1968:
1794:
1736:
1699:
1636:
1560:
1481:
1433:
1324:"He has invented his entire personal history. Nothing he says about himself is true."
972:
403:
399:
167:
1635:
The question is simply whether we should include these claims. To what extent is it
1160:. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
3069:
3042:
3011:
2937:
2893:
2771:
2728:
2564:
2525:
2445:
2374:
2349:
2252:
2209:
I argued that the claims were sourced to Shamir's own website, and were originally
1834:
1786:
1772:
1568:
1515:
1501:
1463:
1372:
1337:
1163:
1044:
387:
2474:
The best sources to use when describing fringe theories, and in determining their
1632:
2817:
2475:
2290:
2196:
1953:
1916:
1875:
1790:
1763:
And we have academic sources detailing the issues with the website. Please read
1740:
1703:
1670:
1655:
1602:
1519:
1441:
1376:
1274:
642:
621:
420:
Day to Mark the Departure and Expulsion of Jews from the Arab Countries and Iran
865:
847:
1514:
All this (his promotion of antisemitism and Holocaust denial) is described in
962:
871:
769:
648:
591:
383:
157:
2910:
Comment is Free piece. Brown is writing in the comment is free section, and
2852:
Manfred Ropschitz in IndyMedia - open publishing site, not a reliable source
1125:
related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
587:
151:
130:
2259:(with the proviso "Shamir says" before them), under Knowledge' policy's on
1298:
Beyond that, Shamir's claims have been reported in secondary sites such as
763:
742:
310:
306:
2432:. Tablet is reporting on what Shamir says about himself prefacing it with
2274:
from (likely) Shamir's original edits, as the wording is almost the same
1893:. I have zero interest in what Shamir did or did not do to this article,
1242:
2215:
Israel Shamir continued to edit war to keep this content in the article
1728:
actually says. Here, Ill quote in the hopes this gets the point across:
792:
3104:
3078:
3050:
3034:
3019:
2990:
2961:
2946:
2928:
2901:
2880:
2825:
2797:
2779:
2756:
2736:
2711:
2685:
2660:
2638:
2607:
2572:
2549:
2533:
2503:
2453:
2422:
2382:
2357:
2339:
2317:
2298:
2204:
2185:
2168:
the material identified in the RfC. This is reinforced by policy (per
1981:
1961:
1945:
1924:
1908:
1883:
1867:
1842:
1826:
1780:
1757:
1711:
1691:
1663:
1617:
1591:
1576:
1553:
1527:
1509:
1494:
1471:
1449:
1424:
1404:
1384:
1360:
1345:
1316:
1291:
3002:- that you seem to think is an op-ed (I strongly disagree) which has
1808:
Are you seriously arguing that the Times of Israel or Tabler are not
985:
423:
180:
3004:" ืืืืจ ืฆืื, ืืฉืขืืจ ืฉืจ ืืื"ืจ ืืค"ื, ืืืืจ ืฉืืื ืืื ืืชืคืงืื ืืื ืงืฆืจ ืืืื."
2727:- there is no need to respond to each !vote here with walls of text.
901:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
564:
Basic Law proposal: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People
1058:
procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the
2509:
ToI and Tablet quote Shamir for this. Tablet prefaces this with
2395:
sourced to Shamir's website. The only sources used for this are
2325:
Ill also add, in addition to the Times of Israel and Tablet the
20:
2787:
sourced to Shamir's website remains a straightforward untruth.
2059:
does not delve into the subjects "life history" in detail. The
1336:
applies as well, and would preclude using material by Shamir.
1245:
1181:
1039:
93:
74:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
51:
15:
1118:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace
2063:
does not attribute the source for the "life history" given.
1394:
explicitly shows the claim about RS being irrelevant here.
1162:
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the
1115:
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
1085:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
2594:
not reliable (obviously), and no, that they quote Shamir
38:. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If
2089:
neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim ...
2408:
2275:
2225:
2214:
2210:
2093:... there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity
1438:
1411:
253:
248:
243:
238:
2864:
Andrew Brown in The Guardian - comment is free section
1072:
to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for
2113:
Arguements made herein have cited and centred around
2861:
James Ball in The Guardian - comment is free section
2471:???? Have you even read that section? Here, Ill help
2270:
I counter-argued that this seems to be likely to be
2024:
The following discussion is an archived record of a
1633:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Template:Circular_reporting
1462:- self sources can't be used in this particular bio.
984:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
791:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
346:
Timeline of the IsraeliโPalestinian conflict in 2005
179:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2034:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
430:Articles needing translation from Hebrew Knowledge
2916:subject to the newspaper's full editorial control
2858:Mikhail Agursky in Jerusalem Post - opinion piece
2463:is dishonest? It is dishonest, as the claims are
2951:Sorry, opinion from a non-reliable source then.
2855:Ben Dror-Yemini in Makor Rishon - opinion piece
1785:The cites are not to his website. Please read
2161:. Listing such "in detail" is not a summary.
2037:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
1253:This page has archives. Sections older than
34:while commenting or presenting evidence, and
8:
517:Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries
2220:I argued that inclusion of this content is
1103:
930:
842:
737:
616:
447:Israel articles missing geocoordinate data
331:WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration
292:Unknown-importance Israel-related articles
272:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
226:
125:
3145:Low-importance Palestine-related articles
532:Knowledge requested photographs in Israel
1133:With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
2276:as the text in the version of Knowledge
2239:argued that inclusion of the claims is
932:
844:
739:
618:
127:
97:
3130:Low-importance Israel-related articles
3056:
3007:
3003:
2767:
2763:
2556:
2518:
2510:
2489:Hello? Times of Israel and Tablet are
2433:
2346:
2278:at the time the article was written.
2092:
2088:
2084:
2079:. There is no dispute as to this. Per
2044:
1323:
1263:when more than 4 sections are present.
2391:Please dont be dishonest here, it is
686:, where you can add your name to the
7:
2725:Knowledge:Don't bludgeon the process
1631:. There is even a template for this
1051:Warning: active arbitration remedies
978:This article is within the scope of
887:This article is within the scope of
785:This article is within the scope of
664:This article is within the scope of
173:This article is within the scope of
3120:Biography articles of living people
2461:this is sourced to Shamir's website
1076:, provided they are not disruptive)
361:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel
116:It is of interest to the following
3140:C-Class Palestine-related articles
2164:To conclude, there is a consensus
1371:Considering it's not cited to any
682:on Knowledge. Join us by visiting
502:Knowledge requested maps in Israel
286:Unassessed Israel-related articles
14:
2598:this does not establish weight.--
2559:It is hard to pin down the truth,
2513:It is hard to pin down the truth,
2436:It is hard to pin down the truth,
1257:may be automatically archived by
481:Israel articles needing attention
464:Israel articles needing infoboxes
2830:The discussion above is closed.
2521:It is hard to pin down the truth
2243:due to their being reprinted by
2083:, such a source may be used for
2065:As an aside, it would have been
1186:
1043:
965:
955:
934:
874:
864:
846:
772:
762:
741:
690:where you can contribute to the
651:
641:
620:
307:Cleanup listing for this project
263:
160:
150:
129:
98:
57:This article must adhere to the
19:
3160:Low-importance Judaism articles
3125:C-Class Israel-related articles
2867:Socialist Viewpoint - editorial
2816:written in the editorial voice.
1857:that Shamir was a paratrooper.
1018:This article has been rated as
911:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
825:This article has been rated as
720:This article has been rated as
700:Knowledge:WikiProject Palestine
497:Module:Location map/data/Israel
213:This article has been rated as
3180:Low-importance Sweden articles
3170:WikiProject Biography articles
3150:WikiProject Palestine articles
2561:but Shamir said he was born...
2515:but Shamir said he was born...
2438:but Shamir said he was born...
2095:. This is similarly stated at
914:Template:WikiProject Biography
703:Template:WikiProject Palestine
444:Add geographic coordinates to
358:Participate in discussions at
1:
2914:requires News Blogs that are
2826:23:31, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
2723:On a procedural note, please
1099:contentious topics procedures
992:and see a list of open tasks.
805:Knowledge:WikiProject Judaism
799:and see a list of open tasks.
187:and see a list of open tasks.
60:biographies of living persons
3185:All WikiProject Sweden pages
3105:22:14, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
2491:independent reliable sources
2484:independent reliable sources
2085:information about themselves
1850:Independent reliable sources
1814:independent reliable sources
1810:independent reliable sources
998:Knowledge:WikiProject Sweden
899:contribute to the discussion
808:Template:WikiProject Judaism
529:Add pictures to articles in
193:Knowledge:WikiProject Israel
36:do not make personal attacks
3135:WikiProject Israel articles
2712:16:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
2686:09:19, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
2563:- which prefaces the claim.
2213:, before an account called
2186:11:42, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
2140:I would; however, point to
1801:yourself. See where it says
1001:Template:WikiProject Sweden
416:Trial of Benjamin Netanyahu
196:Template:WikiProject Israel
72:must be removed immediately
3201:
3165:C-Class biography articles
3061:Israel Democracy Institute
2762:Read what I wrote again -
2661:16:17, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
2157:of the sources written in
1068:You must be logged-in and
1024:project's importance scale
831:project's importance scale
726:project's importance scale
706:Palestine-related articles
499:. Add maps to articles in
380:Diamond industry in Israel
219:project's importance scale
3079:10:26, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
3051:06:22, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
3035:06:17, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
3020:06:08, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
2991:03:41, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
2962:18:09, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
2947:09:45, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
2929:21:02, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
2902:20:37, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
2881:20:19, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
2798:09:20, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
2780:02:05, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
2757:21:36, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
2737:21:13, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
2639:20:55, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
2608:18:24, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
2573:02:11, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
2550:16:38, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
2534:15:53, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
2504:15:27, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
2454:14:53, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
2423:14:28, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
2383:05:06, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
2358:01:57, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
2340:21:38, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
2318:03:15, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
2299:21:08, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
2205:21:08, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
2087:but the material must be
1982:14:23, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
1962:04:08, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
1946:16:20, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
1925:12:15, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
1909:00:05, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
1884:17:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
1868:14:21, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
1843:11:33, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
1827:05:41, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
1781:04:00, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
1758:03:29, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
1712:03:23, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
1692:02:44, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
1664:01:28, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
1644:sufficient for inclusion.
1618:18:07, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
1592:20:20, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
1577:19:56, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
1554:19:44, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
1528:18:32, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
1510:17:50, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
1495:16:55, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
1472:16:23, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
1450:15:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
1425:15:04, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
1405:14:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
1385:11:50, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
1361:14:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
1346:07:22, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
1317:21:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
1292:20:57, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
1101:before editing this page.
1017:
950:
859:
824:
757:
719:
636:
225:
212:
145:
124:
3155:C-Class Judaism articles
2832:Please do not modify it.
2031:Please do not modify it.
1158:normal editorial process
1095:normal editorial process
439:Geographical coordinates
3175:C-Class Sweden articles
2121:, which is a matter of
1724:seemingly ignores what
1718:actually on his website
1164:Arbitration enforcement
408:Public Defence (Israel)
309:is available. See also
199:Israel-related articles
2626:
2488:
1807:
1734:
1260:Lowercase sigmabot III
1154:standards of behaviour
1091:standards of behaviour
106:This article is rated
2621:
2472:
2430:what the website says
1802:
1729:
1060:ArabโIsraeli conflict
890:WikiProject Biography
667:WikiProject Palestine
230:Project Israel To Do:
2653:TheTimesAreAChanging
2345:JPOST prefaced with
2245:Times of Israel here
1641:Paratroopers Brigade
1150:purpose of Knowledge
1144:After being warned,
1087:purpose of Knowledge
1074:making edit requests
315:the tool's wiki page
311:the list by category
2839:problematic sources
2718:Extended discussion
2409:you say is reliable
2281:On the other hand,
2231:On the other hand,
2026:request for comment
1432:The content is not
1332:(4). Furthermore -
1300:The Times of Israel
1108:Further information
788:WikiProject Judaism
579:Translate to Hebrew
2811:September comments
2272:circular reporting
1629:Circular reporting
1146:contentious topics
1124:
1122:make edit requests
1070:extended-confirmed
1056:contentious topics
1052:
981:WikiProject Sweden
917:biography articles
680:State of Palestine
676:Palestinian people
495:See discussion at
176:WikiProject Israel
112:content assessment
3107:
3037:
2993:
2964:
2931:
2883:
2800:
2759:
2691:Exclude from lead
2674:
2641:
2552:
2506:
2425:
2342:
2320:
2263:. (In addition,
2070:
1984:
1948:
1911:
1870:
1829:
1760:
1743:, notability has
1694:
1678:dislike something
1620:
1594:
1556:
1497:
1427:
1407:
1363:
1319:
1294:
1267:
1266:
1232:
1231:
1178:
1177:
1174:
1173:
1119:
1050:
1038:
1037:
1034:
1033:
1030:
1029:
929:
928:
925:
924:
841:
840:
837:
836:
736:
735:
732:
731:
615:
614:
611:
610:
607:
606:
603:
602:
461:Add infoboxes to
424:Pre-Modern Aliyah
396:Sephardic Haredim
92:
91:
50:
49:
3192:
3100:
3095:
3077:
3030:
3025:
2986:
2981:
2957:
2952:
2945:
2924:
2919:
2876:
2871:
2793:
2788:
2752:
2747:
2668:
2634:
2629:
2545:
2540:
2499:
2494:
2418:
2413:
2335:
2330:
2313:
2308:
2286:
2236:
2146:WP:NOTEVERYTHING
2064:
2033:
1977:
1972:
1941:
1936:
1904:
1899:
1863:
1858:
1822:
1817:
1753:
1748:
1687:
1682:
1674:
1613:
1608:
1606:
1587:
1582:
1549:
1544:
1490:
1485:
1420:
1415:
1400:
1395:
1356:
1351:
1312:
1307:
1287:
1282:
1262:
1246:
1201:
1200:
1190:
1182:
1104:
1047:
1040:
1006:
1005:
1002:
999:
996:
975:
970:
969:
968:
959:
952:
951:
946:
938:
931:
919:
918:
915:
912:
909:
895:join the project
884:
882:Biography portal
879:
878:
877:
868:
861:
860:
850:
843:
813:
812:
811:Judaism articles
809:
806:
803:
782:
777:
776:
775:
766:
759:
758:
753:
745:
738:
708:
707:
704:
701:
698:
684:the project page
661:
659:Palestine portal
656:
655:
654:
645:
638:
637:
632:
624:
617:
412:Prisoner of Zion
353:Deletion sorting
267:
260:
259:
227:
201:
200:
197:
194:
191:
170:
165:
164:
163:
154:
147:
146:
141:
133:
126:
109:
103:
102:
94:
80:this noticeboard
52:
42:is not reached,
23:
22:
16:
3200:
3199:
3195:
3194:
3193:
3191:
3190:
3189:
3110:
3109:
3098:
3091:
3089:Alan Dershowitz
3068:
3028:
3000:Ben-Dror Yemini
2984:
2977:
2975:Mapam spokesman
2955:
2936:
2922:
2874:
2841:
2836:
2835:
2813:
2791:
2750:
2720:
2671:Summoned by bot
2632:
2543:
2497:
2416:
2401:Times of Israel
2397:Tablet Magazine
2333:
2311:
2284:
2249:Times of Israel
2234:
2192:
2077:WP:QUESTIONABLE
2061:final reference
2029:
2019:
1975:
1939:
1902:
1861:
1820:
1751:
1685:
1668:
1611:
1600:
1585:
1547:
1488:
1478:Stephen Pollard
1476:So you include
1418:
1398:
1354:
1310:
1285:
1272:
1258:
1247:
1241:
1195:
1170:
1152:, any expected
1109:
1089:, any expected
1082:
1004:Sweden articles
1003:
1000:
997:
994:
993:
971:
966:
964:
944:
916:
913:
910:
907:
906:
880:
875:
873:
810:
807:
804:
801:
800:
778:
773:
771:
751:
705:
702:
699:
696:
695:
688:list of members
657:
652:
650:
630:
599:
584:David Bar-Hayim
392:Rami Kleinstein
376:Ayala Procaccia
328:Participate in
258:
198:
195:
192:
189:
188:
166:
161:
159:
139:
110:on Knowledge's
107:
44:other solutions
12:
11:
5:
3198:
3196:
3188:
3187:
3182:
3177:
3172:
3167:
3162:
3157:
3152:
3147:
3142:
3137:
3132:
3127:
3122:
3112:
3111:
3090:
3087:
3086:
3085:
3084:
3083:
3082:
3081:
3053:
2976:
2973:
2972:
2971:
2970:
2969:
2968:
2967:
2966:
2965:
2869:
2868:
2865:
2862:
2859:
2856:
2853:
2840:
2837:
2829:
2812:
2809:
2808:
2807:
2806:
2805:
2804:
2803:
2802:
2801:
2740:
2739:
2719:
2716:
2715:
2714:
2688:
2663:
2645:
2644:
2643:
2642:
2611:
2610:
2588:
2587:
2586:
2585:
2584:
2583:
2582:
2581:
2580:
2579:
2578:
2577:
2576:
2575:
2386:
2385:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2360:
2327:Jerusalem Post
2322:
2321:
2193:
2191:
2190:
2189:
2188:
2166:not to include
2162:
2138:
2111:
2100:
2073:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2020:
2018:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1986:
1985:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1452:
1408:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1271:
1270:Shamir and SPS
1268:
1265:
1264:
1252:
1249:
1248:
1243:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1233:
1230:
1229:
1224:
1218:
1217:
1212:
1207:
1197:
1196:
1191:
1185:
1176:
1175:
1172:
1171:
1167:
1161:
1142:
1141:
1138:
1131:
1130:
1126:
1114:
1111:
1110:
1107:
1081:
1080:
1077:
1065:
1048:
1036:
1035:
1032:
1031:
1028:
1027:
1020:Low-importance
1016:
1010:
1009:
1007:
990:the discussion
977:
976:
960:
948:
947:
945:Lowโimportance
939:
927:
926:
923:
922:
920:
886:
885:
869:
857:
856:
851:
839:
838:
835:
834:
827:Low-importance
823:
817:
816:
814:
797:the discussion
784:
783:
780:Judaism portal
767:
755:
754:
752:Lowโimportance
746:
734:
733:
730:
729:
722:Low-importance
718:
712:
711:
709:
663:
662:
646:
634:
633:
631:Lowโimportance
625:
613:
612:
609:
608:
605:
604:
601:
600:
598:
597:
596:
595:
574:
566:
553:
536:
519:
506:
485:
468:
451:
434:
426:
365:
348:
335:
318:
296:
271:
269:
268:
257:
256:
251:
246:
241:
235:
232:
231:
223:
222:
215:Low-importance
211:
205:
204:
202:
185:the discussion
172:
171:
155:
143:
142:
140:Lowโimportance
134:
122:
121:
115:
104:
90:
89:
85:this help page
69:poorly sourced
55:
48:
47:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3197:
3186:
3183:
3181:
3178:
3176:
3173:
3171:
3168:
3166:
3163:
3161:
3158:
3156:
3153:
3151:
3148:
3146:
3143:
3141:
3138:
3136:
3133:
3131:
3128:
3126:
3123:
3121:
3118:
3117:
3115:
3108:
3106:
3102:
3101:
3088:
3080:
3075:
3071:
3065:
3062:
3058:
3054:
3052:
3048:
3044:
3039:
3038:
3036:
3032:
3031:
3023:
3022:
3021:
3017:
3013:
3009:
3005:
3001:
2996:
2995:
2994:
2992:
2988:
2987:
2974:
2963:
2959:
2958:
2950:
2949:
2948:
2943:
2939:
2933:
2932:
2930:
2926:
2925:
2917:
2913:
2909:
2905:
2904:
2903:
2899:
2895:
2891:
2888:seem to be a
2886:
2885:
2884:
2882:
2878:
2877:
2866:
2863:
2860:
2857:
2854:
2851:
2850:
2849:
2847:
2838:
2833:
2828:
2827:
2823:
2819:
2810:
2799:
2795:
2794:
2786:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2777:
2773:
2769:
2765:
2761:
2760:
2758:
2754:
2753:
2744:
2743:
2742:
2741:
2738:
2734:
2730:
2726:
2722:
2721:
2717:
2713:
2709:
2705:
2701:
2696:
2692:
2689:
2687:
2683:
2679:
2672:
2667:
2664:
2662:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2647:
2646:
2640:
2636:
2635:
2625:
2618:
2615:
2614:
2613:
2612:
2609:
2605:
2601:
2597:
2593:
2590:
2589:
2574:
2570:
2566:
2562:
2560:
2554:
2553:
2551:
2547:
2546:
2537:
2536:
2535:
2531:
2527:
2523:
2522:
2516:
2514:
2508:
2507:
2505:
2501:
2500:
2492:
2487:
2485:
2481:
2477:
2470:
2466:
2462:
2457:
2456:
2455:
2451:
2447:
2443:
2439:
2437:
2431:
2427:
2426:
2424:
2420:
2419:
2410:
2406:
2402:
2398:
2394:
2390:
2389:
2388:
2387:
2384:
2380:
2376:
2372:
2368:
2365:
2364:
2359:
2355:
2351:
2348:
2344:
2343:
2341:
2337:
2336:
2328:
2324:
2323:
2319:
2315:
2314:
2306:
2303:
2302:
2301:
2300:
2296:
2292:
2288:
2287:
2279:
2277:
2273:
2268:
2266:
2262:
2258:
2254:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2238:
2237:
2229:
2227:
2223:
2218:
2216:
2212:
2207:
2206:
2202:
2198:
2187:
2183:
2179:
2178:Cinderella157
2175:
2171:
2170:WP:SELFSOURCE
2167:
2163:
2160:
2159:summary style
2156:
2151:
2147:
2143:
2139:
2136:
2132:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2112:
2109:
2105:
2101:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2082:
2081:WP:SELFSOURCE
2078:
2074:
2072:questionable.
2068:
2062:
2058:
2057:
2051:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2046:
2038:
2035:
2032:
2027:
2022:
2021:
2016:
1983:
1979:
1978:
1970:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1950:
1949:
1947:
1943:
1942:
1933:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1913:
1912:
1910:
1906:
1905:
1896:
1892:
1891:as his claims
1887:
1886:
1885:
1881:
1877:
1872:
1871:
1869:
1865:
1864:
1856:
1851:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1831:
1830:
1828:
1824:
1823:
1815:
1811:
1806:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1778:
1774:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1761:
1759:
1755:
1754:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1733:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1696:
1695:
1693:
1689:
1688:
1679:
1672:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1642:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1619:
1615:
1614:
1604:
1593:
1589:
1588:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1555:
1551:
1550:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1498:
1496:
1492:
1491:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1458:clause 4 and
1457:
1453:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1440:
1435:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1426:
1422:
1421:
1413:
1409:
1406:
1402:
1401:
1393:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1362:
1358:
1357:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1328:- please see
1327:
1325:
1321:
1320:
1318:
1314:
1313:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1293:
1289:
1288:
1280:
1276:
1269:
1261:
1256:
1251:
1250:
1236:
1235:
1228:
1225:
1223:
1220:
1219:
1216:
1213:
1211:
1208:
1206:
1203:
1202:
1199:
1198:
1194:
1189:
1184:
1183:
1180:
1168:
1165:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1139:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1127:
1123:
1117:
1116:
1113:
1112:
1106:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1083:
1078:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1066:
1063:
1061:
1057:
1049:
1046:
1042:
1041:
1025:
1021:
1015:
1012:
1011:
1008:
991:
987:
983:
982:
974:
973:Sweden portal
963:
961:
958:
954:
953:
949:
943:
940:
937:
933:
921:
904:
903:documentation
900:
896:
892:
891:
883:
872:
870:
867:
863:
862:
858:
855:
852:
849:
845:
832:
828:
822:
819:
818:
815:
798:
794:
790:
789:
781:
770:
768:
765:
761:
760:
756:
750:
747:
744:
740:
727:
723:
717:
714:
713:
710:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
668:
660:
649:
647:
644:
640:
639:
635:
629:
626:
623:
619:
593:
589:
585:
582:
580:
576:
575:
573:
571:
567:
565:
562:
560:
559:
554:
551:
550:
545:
543:
542:
537:
534:
533:
528:
526:
525:
520:
518:
515:
513:
512:
507:
504:
503:
498:
494:
492:
491:
486:
483:
482:
477:
475:
474:
469:
466:
465:
460:
458:
457:
452:
449:
448:
443:
441:
440:
435:
432:
431:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
404:Nachum Heiman
401:
400:Zman Tel Aviv
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
374:
372:
371:
366:
363:
362:
357:
355:
354:
349:
347:
344:
342:
341:
336:
333:
332:
327:
325:
324:
319:
316:
312:
308:
305:
303:
302:
297:
294:
293:
288:
287:
282:
280:
279:
274:
273:
270:
266:
262:
261:
255:
252:
250:
247:
245:
242:
240:
237:
236:
234:
233:
229:
228:
224:
220:
216:
210:
207:
206:
203:
186:
182:
178:
177:
169:
168:Israel portal
158:
156:
153:
149:
148:
144:
138:
135:
132:
128:
123:
119:
113:
105:
101:
96:
95:
87:
86:
81:
77:
73:
70:
66:
62:
61:
56:
54:
53:
45:
41:
37:
33:
29:
25:
18:
17:
3096:
3092:
3026:
2982:
2978:
2953:
2920:
2915:
2872:
2870:
2842:
2831:
2814:
2789:
2784:
2748:
2690:
2665:
2648:
2630:
2628:understand.
2622:
2595:
2591:
2558:
2541:
2520:
2512:
2495:
2490:
2473:
2464:
2460:
2435:
2429:
2414:
2392:
2366:
2331:
2309:
2304:
2282:
2280:
2269:
2256:
2232:
2230:
2219:
2208:
2194:
2174:WP:ABOUTSELF
2165:
2107:
2097:WP:ABOUTSELF
2066:
2054:
2036:
2030:
2023:
1973:
1937:
1931:
1900:
1894:
1890:
1859:
1854:
1849:
1818:
1813:
1809:
1803:
1769:WP:PROFRINGE
1749:
1744:
1730:
1717:
1683:
1609:
1599:
1583:
1545:
1542:
1486:
1456:WP:ABOUTSELF
1416:
1396:
1392:WP:ABOUTSELF
1370:
1352:
1330:WP:ABOUTSELF
1308:
1283:
1279:WP:ABOUTSELF
1273:
1254:
1192:
1179:
1166:noticeboard.
1143:
1132:
1084:
1064:
1053:
1019:
979:
888:
826:
786:
721:
674:region, the
665:
578:
577:
569:
568:
556:
555:
549:Israel stubs
547:
539:
538:
530:
522:
521:
509:
508:
500:
488:
487:
479:
471:
470:
462:
454:
453:
445:
437:
436:
428:
388:Levin Kipnis
368:
367:
359:
351:
350:
338:
337:
329:
321:
320:
299:
298:
290:
284:
276:
275:
214:
174:
118:WikiProjects
83:
71:
64:
58:
26:Please stay
2890:WP:NEWSBLOG
1275:User:Avaya1
692:discussions
323:Collaborate
3114:Categories
2480:prominence
2476:notability
592:Guy Oseary
384:Edna Arbel
2912:WP:BLPSPS
2704:Aquillion
2617:WP:WEIGHT
2600:Calthinus
2257:as claims
2251:/AP is a
2123:WP:WEIGHT
2104:WP:BIASED
2067:good form
1895:right now
1567:websites.
1565:WP:FRINGE
1227:Archive 5
1222:Archive 4
1215:Archive 3
1210:Archive 2
1205:Archive 1
1156:, or any
1129:required.
1093:, or any
908:Biography
854:Biography
697:Palestine
672:Palestine
628:Palestine
588:Guy Bavli
427:See also
283:Rate the
76:libellous
40:consensus
3099:nableezy
3029:nableezy
2985:nableezy
2956:nableezy
2923:nableezy
2875:nableezy
2792:nableezy
2751:nableezy
2695:WP:UNDUE
2678:Pincrete
2633:nableezy
2544:nableezy
2498:nableezy
2469:WP:FRIND
2442:WP:FRIND
2417:nableezy
2405:a source
2371:WP:FRIND
2334:nableezy
2312:nableezy
2285:nableezy
2235:nableezy
2222:WP:UNDUE
2119:WP:FRIND
1976:nableezy
1940:nableezy
1903:nableezy
1862:nableezy
1821:nableezy
1799:WP:FRIND
1765:WP:FRIND
1752:nableezy
1732:sources.
1726:WP:UNDUE
1722:WP:UNDUE
1686:nableezy
1612:nableezy
1586:nableezy
1548:nableezy
1489:nableezy
1460:WP:FRIND
1419:nableezy
1399:nableezy
1355:nableezy
1334:WP:FRIND
1311:nableezy
1286:nableezy
1193:Archives
1120:only to
678:and the
473:Maintain
340:Copyedit
3070:RolandR
3043:Icewhiz
3012:Icewhiz
2938:RolandR
2894:Icewhiz
2772:Icewhiz
2729:Icewhiz
2666:Include
2565:Icewhiz
2526:Icewhiz
2446:Icewhiz
2375:Icewhiz
2350:Icewhiz
2305:Include
2155:summary
2142:WP:ONUS
2135:opinion
1932:Nothing
1835:Icewhiz
1773:Icewhiz
1745:nothing
1569:Icewhiz
1502:Icewhiz
1464:Icewhiz
1338:Icewhiz
1255:30 days
1022:on the
829:on the
802:Judaism
793:Judaism
749:Judaism
724:on the
456:Infobox
301:Cleanup
244:history
217:on the
108:C-class
2846:WP:BLP
2818:Avaya1
2700:WP:DUE
2592:Remove
2482:, are
2367:Remove
2291:Avaya1
2265:Tablet
2261:WP:DUE
2241:WP:DUE
2228:.
2197:Avaya1
2133:is an
2127:WP:DUE
2115:WP:DUE
2056:Tablet
1969:WP:DUE
1954:Avaya1
1917:Avaya1
1898:true.
1876:Avaya1
1848:case.
1795:WP:DUE
1737:WP:DUE
1704:Avaya1
1700:WP:DUE
1671:Avaya1
1656:Avaya1
1637:WP:DUE
1603:Avaya1
1561:WP:SPS
1520:Avaya1
1482:WP:BLP
1442:Avaya1
1434:WP:DUE
1377:Avaya1
1304:Tablet
1277:, per
995:Sweden
986:Sweden
942:Sweden
590:, and
558:Update
370:Expand
278:Assess
190:Israel
181:Israel
137:Israel
114:scale.
2407:that
2253:WP:RS
2150:truth
2129:). A
2117:(and
1787:WP:RS
1516:WP:RS
1373:WP:RS
570:Other
541:Stubs
524:Photo
254:purge
249:watch
32:civil
3074:talk
3047:talk
3016:talk
3006:and
2942:talk
2908:this
2898:talk
2822:talk
2776:talk
2733:talk
2708:talk
2682:talk
2657:talk
2604:talk
2596:says
2569:talk
2530:talk
2478:and
2450:talk
2399:and
2379:talk
2354:talk
2295:talk
2217:.
2201:talk
2182:talk
2172:and
2144:and
2091:and
1958:talk
1921:talk
1880:talk
1855:fact
1839:talk
1793:and
1791:WP:V
1789:and
1777:talk
1767:and
1741:WP:N
1708:talk
1660:talk
1573:talk
1524:talk
1506:talk
1468:talk
1446:talk
1412:here
1381:talk
1342:talk
1302:and
1054:The
897:and
546:See
511:NPOV
478:See
313:and
289:and
239:edit
30:and
28:calm
2620:you
2465:not
2393:not
2131:POV
2108:not
1014:Low
821:Low
716:Low
490:Map
209:Low
65:BLP
3116::
3103:-
3049:)
3033:-
3018:)
2989:-
2960:-
2927:-
2918:.
2900:)
2879:-
2824:)
2796:-
2785:is
2778:)
2770:.
2755:-
2735:)
2710:)
2693:;
2684:)
2659:)
2649:No
2637:-
2606:)
2571:)
2548:-
2532:)
2502:-
2452:)
2421:-
2381:)
2356:)
2338:-
2316:-
2297:)
2247:.
2203:)
2184:)
2028:.
1980:-
1960:)
1944:-
1923:)
1907:-
1882:)
1866:-
1841:)
1825:-
1816:?
1779:)
1756:-
1710:)
1690:-
1662:)
1616:-
1590:-
1575:)
1552:-
1526:)
1508:)
1493:-
1470:)
1448:)
1423:-
1403:-
1383:)
1359:-
1344:)
1315:-
1306:.
1290:-
586:,
422:,
418:,
414:,
410:,
406:,
402:,
398:,
394:,
390:,
386:,
382:,
378:,
3076:)
3072:(
3063:.
3045:(
3014:(
2944:)
2940:(
2896:(
2892:.
2820:(
2774:(
2731:(
2706:(
2680:(
2673:)
2669:(
2655:(
2602:(
2567:(
2557:"
2528:(
2519:"
2511:"
2448:(
2434:"
2377:(
2352:(
2293:(
2199:(
2180:(
2125:/
2099:.
1956:(
1919:(
1878:(
1837:(
1775:(
1706:(
1673::
1669:@
1658:(
1605::
1601:@
1571:(
1522:(
1504:(
1466:(
1444:(
1379:(
1340:(
1026:.
905:.
833:.
728:.
694:.
594:.
581::
572::
561::
552:.
544::
535:.
527::
514::
505:.
493::
484:.
476::
467:.
459::
450:.
442::
433:.
373::
364:.
356::
343::
334:.
326::
317:.
304::
295:.
281::
221:.
120::
88:.
63:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.