Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:John Radzilowski

Source 📝

596:
historical study,” which, as one may conclude from his exposition, is a group of historians dealing with recent Polish history. What is “neo-Stalinism” and the “neo- Stalinist turn,” to leave the trendy word discourse on the margin? (Incidentally, RadziƂowski misapplies that word). It is not at all easy to discern its constitutive characteristics in the tangle of the accusations. .... According to RadziƂowski, it is not so much the chimerical nature of “neo-Stalinism” which is so intriguing in the text as the depth of the roots he thinks “new-Stalinism” has taken. The study scrupulously states that “neo-Stalinism” has certainly been dominant in the American social sciences since the 1960s. If one reads RadziƂowski’s wordy essay literally then one may conclude that apart from him and a few authors (including the authors of the collection) most American historians are still engaged in that enterprise. Furthermore, this Soviet-European-American implant seems to have been a danger to Polish social life since the 1990s. Finally, after a lengthy exposition, the author states that “neo-Stalinism may also be seen as a historiographic offensive bringing turmoil to Polish intellectual, cultural and social life in years following 1989” (p. 246)."
523:- please indicate what you think is a BLP vio here? Our subject, Radzilowski, wrote this. Three separate academics, in a published academic setting, addressed Radzilowski's neo-Stalinism piece. We generally cover article subjects in the manner they are covered in independent reliable sources - and this is most probably (per my BEFORE of the subject) the work he is most noted for in independent which have analyzed this essay in depth. Our text is well supported by the sources its cites, and quotations have been provided. 337: 316: 347: 638:- my edit reflect this. Please note that BLPTALK applies to Krzywiec. Considering 3 separate sources cover this work on neo-Stalinism in a similar fashion, the authors' being mainstream academics, there is little reason to think they.are "biased". Radzilowski's words themselves (in English and in a separate article in Polish) are rather clear themselves - however we should prefer secondary academic sources covering this. 141: 123: 232: 211: 939: 92: 242: 804: 21: 998: 914:
general writing on Poland, as well as most of the field of social sciences in the US. As quite evident in RSes covering our subject - his neo-Stalinism work got more coverage than any other work he published. Per coverage of our subkect in independent sources, a significant chunk of this article should be devoted to neo-Stalinism.
151: 595:
The essays by John RadziƂowski and Wojciech Jerzy MuszyƄski from the collection win the nonsense writing competition by several lengths. The former’s essay titled “The Neo-Stalinist Discourse in Polish Historical Studies in the United States” was perhaps an attempt to characterize “a school of Polish
615:
as "neo-Stalinist. Then you, taking liberties with an obviously biased source turned that into the more extreme "Radzilowski asserts that "neo-Stalinism" is dominant since the 1960s in American social sciences and that most American historians (with the exception of Radzilowski and a few colleagues)
913:
His CV lists a few works on neo-Stalinism, yes. The one that got the most attention is the book chapter (18 pages, a bit more than stray comments). As stated in RSes (and you should be able to verify easily in in the chapter itself) - he named names (much more than 2) , referred to US historians in
559:
What specifically is cherry picked here? The entire piece by Radzilowski is about "neo-Stalinism" in academia in general and in regards to Poland. He has written another piece on this in Polish, asserting a different academic was blackballed due to this. There is nothing slanderous in fairly
897:
None of these show "work on 'neo-Stalinism'". You're taking a couple stray comments and pretending they're something they're not. Has he published any papers on "neo-Stalinism"? And this aside from the issue that his comments referred to a coupe specific authors not "social sciences" in
966:
Radzilowski is not an Associate Professor anymore; he has been promoted to full professor in the Department of Social Science in 2019. He teaches European, U.S., World History, Geography and Art History. Source: his webpage at the University of Alaska Southeast:
560:
representing an author's work - which has been analyzed in depth by reliable sources. Saying no consensus without backing this up with sources or policy is not an arguement - multiple in-depth sources have been presented covering this.
718:
As our subject's work on "neo-Stalinism" is omitted from the article, despite being the most analyzed piece by our aubject in RSes, the article is not neutral as it does not reflect coverage of our subject in reliable
766:
Our subject's work on neo-Stalinism has beeb covered at length in 3 academic sources (the 2 cited ones + Sarmatian Review). If you have an issue with wording - please suggest an alternative formulation.
1078: 672:. Radzilowski does both in this 18 page essay - he starts with general social sciences prior to addressing most historians (far from a particular school), in the US, that have written on Poland. 377: 752:
There's no "work on "neo-Stalinism"". What there was in the article is your own gross misrepresentation of the sources and a obnoxious BLP violation. Tag is tendentious and spurious.
71: 394: 980:"He is a professor of history at the University of Alaska Southeast, Department of Social Science, where teaches European, U.S. and World History, Geography and Art History." 31: 430: 789:
Krzywiec, Grzegorz. "Controversies: Golden Harvest or Hearts of Gold? Studies on the Wartime Fate of Poles and Jews." Holocaust Studies and Materials 3 (2013): 572-573
593:
While this is not required for English sources, I have done so inline in the referencs in the article. I shall repeat over here as well (text from pages 572-573 -
76: 1073: 420: 384: 500:
Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Knowledge (XXG) page. Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity
1038: 1083: 654:"Three separate sources" do not cover this work in this way. Goska explicitly notes that he is referring to a particular school of Polish historical study. 59:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or 389: 1068: 298: 169: 51: 880:
I think it's ok to mention that he views some other scholars as being NS, but the wording of such a note should be neutral, without editorializing. --
1058: 1048: 288: 173: 1043: 360: 321: 1063: 264: 168:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge (XXG)'s articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 1053: 981: 825:. Chodakiewicz credits RadziƂowski for coining the term. Should probably not be used due to the nature of the publication and authors. 372: 177: 863:- how about you suggest wording on Radzilowski's work on neo-Stalinism? I would suggest sticking to the academic sources in English. 811:. Probably should not be used, even though the publisher is reputable, academic reviews of this book have pointed out several issues. 164: 128: 479:. Goska focused on a subset of Polish-American individuals named in this chapter, wheres Krzywiec covered the chapter as a whole. I 636:"The study scrupulously states that “neo-Stalinism” has certainly been dominant in the American social sciences since the 1960s." 368:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
734:
For the record - on 25 January 2019, Icewhiz has nominated this page to be deleted. (unsuccessfully) Details can be seen here:
255: 216: 103: 1016: 833: 27: 829: 945: 60: 903: 843: 823: 757: 659: 621: 461: 735: 109: 1011: 1006: 985: 741: 584: 550: 507: 91: 815: 808: 846: 263:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
616:
are engaged in "neo-Stalinism". Hard to say which part of that nonsense is you and which is the author.
899: 858: 753: 655: 617: 457: 352: 70:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to 20: 737: 580: 546: 518: 503: 74:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see 819: 336: 315: 67: 919: 886: 868: 771: 724: 677: 643: 602: 565: 528: 488: 156: 542: 476: 788: 576: 453: 541:
concerns to the point of being potentially slanderous towards reputable scholar. (see
1032: 797: 365: 247: 915: 882: 864: 839: 835:- again crediting RadziƂowski. Should probably not be used due to nature of author. 767: 720: 673: 639: 598: 561: 524: 484: 976:"He is an associate professor of history at the University of Alaska Southeast." 968: 140: 122: 342: 237: 231: 210: 146: 364:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 1023: 989: 923: 907: 892: 872: 775: 761: 745: 728: 681: 663: 647: 625: 606: 588: 569: 554: 532: 511: 492: 465: 579:
to back up some of the potentially BLP violating claims in the article”
456:
to back up some of the potentially BLP violating claims in the article.
260: 176:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 849:, probably should not be due to the nature of this radio station. 538: 1009:(changed to professor and added paragraph in Career section). 933: 574:
I'll also copy VM request you so far failed to address --: -->
85: 66:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
43: 15: 537:
No need to cherry-pick, not particularly relevant, serious
930:
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 May 2021
480: 472: 259:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1079:
Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
613:a particular “school of Polish historical study” 969:https://uas.alaska.edu/dir/jtradzilowski.html 8: 310: 205: 117: 89: 405:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States 828:Polish: Chodakiewicz writing in 2019 in 575:"Please provide the relevant text from 312: 207: 119: 842:discussing "neo-Stalinism" in depth - 838:Polish: Interview with RadziƂowski on 635: 594: 452:Please provide the relevant text from 1074:Low-importance United States articles 883:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 186:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography 7: 634:The academic journal article states 358:This article is within the scope of 253:This article is within the scope of 162:This article is within the scope of 1039:Biography articles of living people 108:It is of interest to the following 1084:WikiProject United States articles 545:) Clearly no consensus to include. 408:Template:WikiProject United States 273:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Poland 30:on 22 January 2019. The result of 14: 1069:Stub-Class United States articles 996: 937: 345: 335: 314: 240: 230: 209: 149: 139: 121: 90: 49:This article must adhere to the 19: 798:book review in Sarmatian Review 425:This article has been rated as 293:This article has been rated as 26:This article was nominated for 1059:Low-importance Poland articles 1049:WikiProject Biography articles 796:Academic writing, in English: 793:Academic writing, in English: 787:Academic writing, in English: 611:Right, so Radzilowski accused 189:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 1044:Stub-Class biography articles 267:and see a list of open tasks. 52:biographies of living persons 845:- while possibly usable per 174:contribute to the discussion 1064:WikiProject Poland articles 960:to reactivate your request. 948:has been answered. Set the 276:Template:WikiProject Poland 64:must be removed immediately 1100: 1054:Stub-Class Poland articles 431:project's importance scale 299:project's importance scale 803:Chodakiewicz in English: 424: 361:WikiProject United States 330: 292: 225: 134: 116: 1024:00:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC) 990:23:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC) 924:03:47, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 908:22:45, 19 May 2019 (UTC) 893:07:11, 19 May 2019 (UTC) 873:06:14, 19 May 2019 (UTC) 818:+RadziƂowski writing in 776:16:06, 18 May 2019 (UTC) 762:15:10, 18 May 2019 (UTC) 746:05:53, 18 May 2019 (UTC) 729:05:16, 18 May 2019 (UTC) 682:20:57, 18 May 2019 (UTC) 664:20:42, 18 May 2019 (UTC) 648:16:11, 18 May 2019 (UTC) 626:15:14, 18 May 2019 (UTC) 607:06:10, 18 May 2019 (UTC) 589:06:01, 18 May 2019 (UTC) 570:05:56, 18 May 2019 (UTC) 555:05:42, 18 May 2019 (UTC) 533:05:13, 18 May 2019 (UTC) 512:04:59, 18 May 2019 (UTC) 493:20:04, 17 May 2019 (UTC) 483:with inline quotations. 466:15:26, 17 May 2019 (UTC) 366:United States of America 816:Marek Jan Chodakiewicz 809:Transaction Publishers 411:United States articles 98:This article is rated 805:page 523 (conclusion) 165:WikiProject Biography 102:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 830:Tygodnik Solidarnoƛć 473:edit summary in diff 353:United States portal 36:nomination withdrawn 1007:revision 1025144740 379:Articles Requested! 256:WikiProject Poland 192:biography articles 104:content assessment 964: 963: 445: 444: 441: 440: 437: 436: 309: 308: 305: 304: 204: 203: 200: 199: 84: 83: 42: 41: 1091: 1019: 1014: 1004: 1000: 999: 955: 951: 941: 940: 934: 889: 862: 670:Sarmatian Review 522: 497:@Icewhiz --: --> 413: 412: 409: 406: 403: 355: 350: 349: 348: 339: 332: 331: 326: 318: 311: 281: 280: 277: 274: 271: 250: 245: 244: 243: 234: 227: 226: 221: 213: 206: 194: 193: 190: 187: 184: 170:join the project 159: 157:Biography portal 154: 153: 152: 143: 136: 135: 125: 118: 101: 95: 94: 86: 72:this noticeboard 44: 23: 16: 1099: 1098: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1029: 1028: 1017: 1012: 997: 995: 953: 949: 938: 932: 900:Volunteer Marek 891: 887: 859:Volunteer Marek 856: 820:NajwyĆŒszy Czas! 807:- published by 754:Volunteer Marek 716: 656:Volunteer Marek 618:Volunteer Marek 516: 458:Volunteer Marek 450: 410: 407: 404: 401: 400: 399: 385:Become a Member 351: 346: 344: 324: 279:Poland articles 278: 275: 272: 269: 268: 246: 241: 239: 219: 191: 188: 185: 182: 181: 155: 150: 148: 99: 12: 11: 5: 1097: 1095: 1087: 1086: 1081: 1076: 1071: 1066: 1061: 1056: 1051: 1046: 1041: 1031: 1030: 1027: 1026: 962: 961: 942: 931: 928: 927: 926: 881: 878: 877: 876: 875: 851: 850: 836: 826: 812: 801: 794: 791: 781: 780: 779: 778: 749: 748: 715: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 700: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 693: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 668:There is also 471:In regards to 449: 446: 443: 442: 439: 438: 435: 434: 427:Low-importance 423: 417: 416: 414: 398: 397: 392: 387: 382: 375: 373:Template Usage 369: 357: 356: 340: 328: 327: 325:Low‑importance 319: 307: 306: 303: 302: 295:Low-importance 291: 285: 284: 282: 265:the discussion 252: 251: 235: 223: 222: 220:Low‑importance 214: 202: 201: 198: 197: 195: 161: 160: 144: 132: 131: 126: 114: 113: 107: 96: 82: 81: 77:this help page 61:poorly sourced 47: 40: 39: 32:the discussion 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1096: 1085: 1082: 1080: 1077: 1075: 1072: 1070: 1067: 1065: 1062: 1060: 1057: 1055: 1052: 1050: 1047: 1045: 1042: 1040: 1037: 1036: 1034: 1025: 1021: 1020: 1015: 1008: 1003: 994: 993: 992: 991: 987: 983: 979: 975: 971: 970: 959: 956:parameter to 947: 943: 936: 935: 929: 925: 921: 917: 912: 911: 910: 909: 905: 901: 895: 894: 890: 884: 874: 870: 866: 860: 855: 854: 853: 852: 848: 844: 841: 837: 834: 831: 827: 824: 821: 817: 813: 810: 806: 802: 799: 795: 792: 790: 786: 785: 784: 777: 773: 769: 765: 764: 763: 759: 755: 751: 750: 747: 743: 739: 738:GizzyCatBella 736: 733: 732: 731: 730: 726: 722: 713: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 666: 665: 661: 657: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 645: 641: 637: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 623: 619: 614: 610: 609: 608: 604: 600: 597: 592: 591: 590: 586: 582: 581:GizzyCatBella 578: 573: 572: 571: 567: 563: 558: 557: 556: 552: 548: 547:GizzyCatBella 544: 540: 536: 535: 534: 530: 526: 520: 519:GizzyCatBella 515: 514: 513: 509: 505: 504:GizzyCatBella 501: 496: 495: 494: 490: 486: 482: 481:restored this 478: 474: 470: 469: 468: 467: 463: 459: 455: 447: 432: 428: 422: 419: 418: 415: 402:United States 396: 393: 391: 388: 386: 383: 381: 380: 376: 374: 371: 370: 367: 363: 362: 354: 343: 341: 338: 334: 333: 329: 323: 322:United States 320: 317: 313: 300: 296: 290: 287: 286: 283: 266: 262: 258: 257: 249: 248:Poland portal 238: 236: 233: 229: 228: 224: 218: 215: 212: 208: 196: 179: 178:documentation 175: 171: 167: 166: 158: 147: 145: 142: 138: 137: 133: 130: 127: 124: 120: 115: 111: 105: 97: 93: 88: 87: 79: 78: 73: 69: 65: 62: 58: 54: 53: 48: 46: 45: 37: 33: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 1010: 1001: 982:24.2.126.191 977: 973: 972: 965: 957: 946:edit request 896: 879: 847:WP:ABOUTSELF 840:Radio Maryja 782: 717: 669: 612: 499: 451: 448:Verification 426: 390:Project Talk 378: 359: 294: 254: 163: 110:WikiProjects 75: 63: 56: 50: 35: 577:this source 454:this source 1033:Categories 950:|answered= 888:reply here 100:Stub-class 783:Sources: 475:- please 183:Biography 129:Biography 68:libellous 898:general. 814:Polish: 719:sources. 28:deletion 974:Change: 916:Icewhiz 865:Icewhiz 768:Icewhiz 721:Icewhiz 674:Icewhiz 640:Icewhiz 599:Icewhiz 562:Icewhiz 525:Icewhiz 485:Icewhiz 429:on the 297:on the 543:WP:BLP 477:WP:AGF 395:Alerts 270:Poland 261:Poland 217:Poland 106:scale. 954:|ans= 944:This 1018:HL ↗ 1002:Done 986:talk 920:talk 904:talk 869:talk 772:talk 758:talk 742:talk 725:talk 714:NPOV 678:talk 660:talk 644:talk 622:talk 603:talk 585:talk 566:talk 551:talk 539:NPOV 529:talk 508:talk 502:..” 489:talk 462:talk 172:and 34:was 1022:🍁 1005:in 978:To: 952:or 421:Low 289:Low 57:BLP 1035:: 1013:TG 988:) 958:no 922:) 906:) 871:) 832:- 822:- 774:) 760:) 744:) 727:) 680:) 662:) 646:) 624:) 605:) 587:) 568:) 553:) 531:) 510:) 491:) 464:) 984:( 918:( 902:( 885:| 867:( 861:: 857:@ 800:. 770:( 756:( 740:( 723:( 676:( 658:( 642:( 620:( 601:( 583:( 564:( 549:( 527:( 521:: 517:@ 506:( 498:" 487:( 460:( 433:. 301:. 180:. 112:: 80:. 55:( 38:.

Index

Articles for deletion
deletion
the discussion
biographies of living persons
poorly sourced
libellous
this noticeboard
this help page

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Biography
WikiProject icon
Biography portal
WikiProject Biography
join the project
contribute to the discussion
documentation
WikiProject icon
Poland
WikiProject icon
Poland portal
WikiProject Poland
Poland
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
United States

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑