Knowledge

Talk:Jackson's inequality

Source πŸ“

84: 74: 53: 22: 838:
Especially, the contribution of Bernstein is much more than what you wrote. Bernstein was the first to suggest that approximability is related to properties such as modulus of continuity, and he proved Bernstein's theorem (the reverse of Jackson's thm.), chronologically even before Jackson. Many
834:
I'am certainly not an expert on the subject, almost all I know is from Akhiezer's book (first edition in 1947, 2-nd - in 1965). If you look through Chapter 5 (on harmonic approximation), you see that already then it was a beautiful and well-developed theory (including L_\infty, L_p and other
831:
regarding the L_2 - L_\infty discussion: it seems I understand what you mean, I agree. Just, please write the precise formulation in the article (if you think it's important enough), with all the definitions.
835:
theorems), to which many people contributed. Therefore I think Stechkin deserves a part of the name no more than Kornneichuk, or Bernstein, or even de la Vallee Poussin, or Nagy (or btw Akhiezer himself).
703: 140: 583: 839:
other ideas in the "constructive theory of functions" originate in his works. Therefore the collective name "Jackson--Bernstein theorems" that is used sometimes is not so bad, to my taste.
745:
Actually such "mixed norms" Jackson's inequalites usually are not of much interest since functions should be approximated in their spaces where its modulus of continuity are defined
732:
form implies the L_2 form (up to some constant). If you wish to write a more precise L_2 ineq, you should replace the modulus of cont. by the so-called L_2 modulus of continuity.
434: 292: 396: 730: 648: 258: 187: 509: 314:) found by different persons (N. I. Chernych and N. P. Korneychuk respectively). So one cannot say here that one norm is weaker than another. They are simply different. 810: 774: 621: 369: 342: 231: 460: 312: 872: 130: 867: 260:
are extremely different spaces, and they have different Jackson inequalities proved by absolutely different methods with different sharp constants (
106: 162:
Hi, thanks for the additions to Jackson's thm. Could you please define E_n(f)? Also, why did you focus on the L_2 norm - it is also true in
97: 58: 653: 33: 522: 21: 705:. Therefore, if on the right-hand side of Jackson's inequality you write the usual modulus of cont., the 39: 83: 401: 263: 374: 105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89: 850: 844: 818: 733: 708: 626: 586: 463: 236: 194: 165: 73: 52: 478: 788: 752: 599: 347: 320: 209: 849:
I have removed the "personal part" about Stechkin, after deciding that it's irrelevant.
439: 297: 861: 853: 821: 736: 589: 466: 197: 817:
Have you read history which I posted to russian page. Or should I translate it?
102: 749:- for example usual (uniform) modulus of continuity doesn't have much sense in 79: 650:
ineqs. are incomparable), but on a finite interval (e.g. for periodic f-ns),
371:
but AFAIK sharp constants are still not found. Stechkin proved constant
827:
Thanks, your survey is very interesting. Here are a few comments:
511:
usualy means value of best approximation by polynomials of degree
15: 462:. For a brief history see Russian page on the inequality. 698:{\displaystyle \|\cdot \|_{2}\leq C\|\cdot \|_{\infty }} 436:), it is very good estimation but not sharp at least at 791: 785:
And Stechkin in mentioned 3/2-inequality surely used
755: 711: 656: 629: 602: 525: 481: 442: 404: 377: 350: 323: 300: 266: 239: 212: 189:
norm; for L_2 a weaker condition is sufficient (some
168: 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 804: 768: 724: 697: 642: 615: 577: 503: 454: 428: 390: 363: 336: 306: 286: 252: 225: 181: 526: 515:(or, more general, by linear space of dimension 8: 686: 679: 664: 657: 578:{\displaystyle \inf\{\|f-p\|:p\in P_{n-1}\}} 572: 544: 532: 529: 19: 47: 796: 790: 760: 754: 716: 710: 689: 667: 655: 634: 628: 607: 601: 560: 524: 486: 480: 441: 403: 378: 376: 355: 349: 328: 322: 299: 277: 272: 267: 265: 244: 238: 217: 211: 173: 167: 49: 7: 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 717: 690: 635: 420: 245: 174: 14: 873:Low-priority mathematics articles 585:. This is a common abbreviation. 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 868:Start-Class mathematics articles 429:{\displaystyle p\in [1,\infty )} 118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 82: 72: 51: 20: 287:{\displaystyle {1}/{\sqrt {2}}} 135:This article has been rated as 596:You are right of course (that 498: 492: 423: 411: 391:{\displaystyle {\frac {3}{2}}} 1: 854:00:58, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 109:and see a list of open tasks. 822:17:14, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 780:is a really wrong word here. 737:15:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 590:11:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 467:11:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 198:12:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 725:{\displaystyle L_{\infty }} 643:{\displaystyle L_{\infty }} 253:{\displaystyle L_{\infty }} 182:{\displaystyle L_{\infty }} 889: 193:modulus of cont.) Thanks, 134: 67: 46: 504:{\displaystyle E_{n}(f)} 141:project's priority scale 98:WikiProject Mathematics 806: 770: 726: 699: 644: 617: 579: 505: 456: 430: 392: 365: 338: 308: 288: 254: 227: 183: 28:This article is rated 807: 805:{\displaystyle L_{p}} 771: 769:{\displaystyle L_{2}} 727: 700: 645: 618: 616:{\displaystyle L_{2}} 580: 506: 457: 431: 393: 366: 364:{\displaystyle L_{2}} 344:spaces are closer to 339: 337:{\displaystyle L_{p}} 309: 289: 255: 228: 226:{\displaystyle L_{2}} 184: 789: 753: 709: 654: 627: 600: 523: 479: 440: 402: 375: 348: 321: 298: 264: 237: 210: 166: 121:mathematics articles 455:{\displaystyle p=2} 802: 766: 722: 695: 640: 613: 575: 501: 452: 426: 388: 361: 334: 304: 284: 250: 223: 179: 158:L_2 vers. L_\infty 90:Mathematics portal 34:content assessment 398:for all of them ( 386: 307:{\displaystyle 1} 282: 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 880: 811: 809: 808: 803: 801: 800: 775: 773: 772: 767: 765: 764: 731: 729: 728: 723: 721: 720: 704: 702: 701: 696: 694: 693: 672: 671: 649: 647: 646: 641: 639: 638: 622: 620: 619: 614: 612: 611: 584: 582: 581: 576: 571: 570: 510: 508: 507: 502: 491: 490: 461: 459: 458: 453: 435: 433: 432: 427: 397: 395: 394: 389: 387: 379: 370: 368: 367: 362: 360: 359: 343: 341: 340: 335: 333: 332: 313: 311: 310: 305: 293: 291: 290: 285: 283: 278: 276: 271: 259: 257: 256: 251: 249: 248: 232: 230: 229: 224: 222: 221: 188: 186: 185: 180: 178: 177: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 888: 887: 883: 882: 881: 879: 878: 877: 858: 857: 792: 787: 786: 756: 751: 750: 712: 707: 706: 685: 663: 652: 651: 630: 625: 624: 603: 598: 597: 556: 521: 520: 482: 477: 476: 438: 437: 400: 399: 373: 372: 351: 346: 345: 324: 319: 318: 296: 295: 262: 261: 240: 235: 234: 213: 208: 207: 169: 164: 163: 160: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 886: 884: 876: 875: 870: 860: 859: 841: 840: 836: 832: 825: 824: 814: 813: 799: 795: 782: 781: 763: 759: 741: 719: 715: 692: 688: 684: 681: 678: 675: 670: 666: 662: 659: 637: 633: 610: 606: 595: 593: 592: 574: 569: 566: 563: 559: 555: 552: 549: 546: 543: 540: 537: 534: 531: 528: 500: 497: 494: 489: 485: 471: 451: 448: 445: 425: 422: 419: 416: 413: 410: 407: 385: 382: 358: 354: 331: 327: 316: 315: 303: 281: 275: 270: 247: 243: 220: 216: 206:In this topic 202: 176: 172: 159: 156: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 885: 874: 871: 869: 866: 865: 863: 856: 855: 852: 847: 846: 837: 833: 830: 829: 828: 823: 820: 816: 815: 797: 793: 784: 783: 779: 761: 757: 748: 744: 743: 742: 739: 738: 735: 713: 682: 676: 673: 668: 660: 631: 608: 604: 591: 588: 567: 564: 561: 557: 553: 550: 547: 541: 538: 535: 518: 514: 495: 487: 483: 474: 473: 472: 469: 468: 465: 449: 446: 443: 417: 414: 408: 405: 383: 380: 356: 352: 329: 325: 301: 279: 273: 268: 241: 218: 214: 205: 204: 203: 200: 199: 196: 192: 170: 157: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 848: 842: 826: 777: 746: 740: 594: 516: 512: 470: 317: 201: 190: 161: 137:Low-priority 136: 96: 62:Low‑priority 40:WikiProjects 112:Mathematics 103:mathematics 59:Mathematics 30:Start-class 862:Categories 812:-modulus. 747:for sure 519:), i.e. 191:average 139:on the 843:Best, 778:weaker 36:scale. 851:Sasha 845:Sasha 819:Mir76 776:. So 734:Sasha 587:Mir76 475:P.S. 464:Mir76 195:Sasha 623:and 294:and 233:and 527:inf 513:n-1 131:Low 864:: 718:∞ 691:∞ 687:β€– 683:β‹… 680:β€– 674:≀ 665:β€– 661:β‹… 658:β€– 636:∞ 565:βˆ’ 554:∈ 545:β€– 539:βˆ’ 533:β€– 421:∞ 409:∈ 246:∞ 175:∞ 798:p 794:L 762:2 758:L 714:L 677:C 669:2 632:L 609:2 605:L 573:} 568:1 562:n 558:P 551:p 548:: 542:p 536:f 530:{ 517:n 499:) 496:f 493:( 488:n 484:E 450:2 447:= 444:p 424:) 418:, 415:1 412:[ 406:p 384:2 381:3 357:2 353:L 330:p 326:L 302:1 280:2 274:/ 269:1 242:L 219:2 215:L 171:L 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
Low
project's priority scale
Sasha
12:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Mir76
11:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Mir76
11:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Sasha
15:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Mir76
17:14, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Sasha
Sasha
00:58, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Categories
Start-Class mathematics articles
Low-priority mathematics articles

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑