Talk:Jeypore Estate - Knowledge (XXG)

2015:(bolded to make it easier for you) retained various degrees of semi-independence. Also, your new additions are not kosher. Rousseleau clearly says that the Vinayak from Kashmir story is a legend, you're converting it into a fact. Your quote is mostly correct though the addition about Vikramaditya appears to be your own (I don't see it in Rousseleau's text). But, Rousseleau only describes the mound and does not associate it with Vinayak, that's your own addition. The entire quote is unnecessary. Sorry, but no. I again suggest you discuss your edits here on the talk page first. -- 640:(KSB Singh, 1939), which is an effort to reconstruct the medieval era history of the Sankara dynasty's rule by an author who, as the book's introduction notes, is "a scion of a Raj-family which once held independent authority in the Orissa Gadjaths; and he has now become a distinguished member of the present Jeypore, the old Nandapur, Maharaja family by marriage. His second son Sree Ramakrishna Deoas Yuvaraja of Jeypore, will,..., carry forward the Jeypore line into the new Self-governing Federated India." 258: 220: 360: 482: 428: 410: 178: 946:

being untrustworthy because "it's only one book" carries any weight, please think again; we don't judge the content of books by an editor's opinion. When you've found reliable sources that back up what you're proposing, you'll be in a position to suggest changes. Before you start searching, please note that on Knowledge (XXG) the consensus (not just my opinion) is that sources belonging to the

126: 1845:

Dominion of India. The Governor-General's notification of acceptance of same would also suffice. Equally, anyone claiming merger into the Union of India should similarly provide a reference with full date to the merger agreement in 1950 or later. Pending the provision of these references, the entity should be termed an estate (with the word zamindari, talukdari, jagir, etc, in parentheses).

384: 244: 336: 84: 268: 775:

Indo-Aryan lineage. In other words, it’s like tracing your Queen’s lineage with the Han Dynasty of China. The article edited by some Sitush is intentionally degrading the main component of the article viz the Suryavansh dynasty. For eg. Last paragraph under History is insignificant however there was a tiny rebellion and he felt it important to add it in the article.

140: 115: 968:

21: 49: 1601: 2069:

an easy task for the Sultanate of Golconda as the next two kings Balaram Dev I and Yashasvan Dev continued resisting their advancement. There were a few skirmishes and battles between the two kingdoms and eventually Golconda was successful in subduing Jeypore and other hill chiefs of Kalinga." Knowledge (XXG) is not a place for writing your fantasy.

1827:, is that you just type the word "princely" to see the result, you should see a sentence stating " ... Vikram Deo, the Maharajah of Jeypore (an erstwhile princely state in Orissa), the college now proivdes instruction, among others, in chemical technology and pharmacy up to the degree and postgradutae degree levels ....", regards. 529:

should not run for long. Knowledge (XXG) must immediately block these so called admins cum cheap swindlers. I am going to post this in the talk page of every wiki admin. Rules should be the same for everyone, just because some royals throw a few pennies at jobless admins, they ignore their pages and let them use titles.

1844:

It is a simple affair to ascertain whether or not an entity was a princely state. Anyone proposing that Jeypore (or anywhere else in dispute) as being a state should be requested to provide an official GOI reference, with full date in 1947 or 1948, of the signing of the Instrument of Accession to the

1898:

Even more reliable academic sources were removed on 27th September by Lancepark without any Edit Summary or reason of their removal. Even the title of the article was changed from “Kingdom of Jeypore” to “Jeypore Estate”. When there are several sources that claim Jeypore was an estate and later got

1688:

I don’t think legal cases can be considered as primary sources. The task of a legal case is to focus on the legal issue rather than the status of the zamindari/princely state. Most of the sources that you mentioned are primary and reliable sources, like books and government websites, which have also

1400:

is more accurate. The lilavati stuff is unsourced. Schnepel uses "so called" in relation to Jeypore ant the Suryavanshis. You've removed Schepel's statement that Cuttack was independent of Jeypore. I'm sorry, but I can't selectively revert your edits so if you could add them piecemeal, that would be

996:

etc. It has nothing to do with the square miles/kilometres/feet ruled and everything to do with the relationship between various kingdoms and "their people" in a region. That you do not know this suggests to me that you haven't actually read any of the the Schepnel sources because it is explained to

645:

Thus, even if one discounts their antiquity and obscure publishers, neither of these works are reliable independent sources that one can build an encyclopedic article upon; and, while they are of potential value as primary material to a scholar studying the area's history, they cannot and should not

2068:

stop putting unsourced info like Shankaravamsa. Kalingapride.com is not a source. Nabin Kumar Sahu is a reliable odia historian and the Koraput district Gazetteer by him clearly mentions that Vishwanath Dev Gajapati submitted to Govind Biddyadhar. Even more unsourced info like "This was however not

945:

isn't a reliable source, you will need to find other reliable sources that make that point. Alternatively, if you believe that the information cited to Schnepel is inaccurate, then please quote the reliable sources that you consulted to form that opinion. If you think that your opinion about a book

885:

This article is inaccurate from beginning till end. The Jeypore Samasthanam kings are Kshatriya not Rajputs. The source cited is the only book that says so. Therefore, it can’t be trusted. The paragraph of Bissam-Cuttak is trivial and it would be better if you could remove the protection from this

627:

His Highness the Maharajah, Sri Sri Sri Vikraima Deo, Azem, Mahalrajah, Yujadud Dowla, Mahabat Assar, Yedal Yemeenay, Salatnut, Samsamay, Killapathay, Islam Sri Jhadkhand Badusha, Maharajah of Jeypore, of the Solar Race, the possessor of a hilly tract, in the Vizagapatam District, is naturally mild

557:

This encyclopedia is not the place for hagiographers to puff up the status of titular maharajahs whose titles were abolished by the Indian government years ago. If you're so keen to meet me, please feel free to drop in to the next Manchester meetup (when we're able to have one) and I'll be happy to

519:

Knowledge (XXG) is sold out to frauds. Two users named Rexxs and Regentspark are running this page and I suspect they are looking for bribes. They removed Prince Vishweshvar's 'Maharajah of Jeypore' saying its unconstitutional as the Indian government abolished all titles. However, when it comes to

1042:

Inside community institutions - temple sects, lineage-based 'little kingdoms', mirasi villages - relationships between privilege and responsibility and between the appropriation of surplus and its reinvestment in production can be seen to have been close. The power of the 'little king' was in many

835:

There's a lot you obviously don't get, but I'll do my best to enlighten you. The article is locked from editing by new editors because of a spate of single-purpose accounts persistently adding unsourced, or unreliably sourced, content to the article in an effort to turn it into an hagiography. I'm

1154:

No, that's a link to a page that embeds the pdf directly into the page for anyone having a plugin that handles pdfs. It also provides a download link for the full text for those whose browsers don't render the pdf. The standard way to link from a citation title is to give the reader the full text

987:

The article is locked because there have been too many promotional edits, sockpuppets, people with a conflict of interest etc editing the thing in outright defiance (not mere ignorance) of Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines. You are demonstrating a rather similar attitude, unfortunately. For

759:

I've just removed two paragraphs - one uncited and the other cited to Times of India, acknowledged as unreliable. This whole article is now stuffed with unreliable sources and puffery. I intend to work through and eliminate all of the uncited content and the content sourced to unreliable sources,

1650:

Actually, it was made a zamindari in 1777 when the British defeated them (as mentioned in Gazetteers) but later in 1930s it’s status was promoted and was made into a princely state (as mentioned in modern sources like Accessions List, India & Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences and

1371:

The explanation is in the edit summary. In your edit, you removed the "mythical" attribute and the "claimed belonging" to the suryavansh kingdom. Since that kingdom is mythical, you cannot make definitive statements about it. Also, the cite you provide says nothing about the fabled Ujjain king.

1271:

What’s the reason behind reverting the entire article ? The edits that were made in the article prior to the recent reverting used primary sources such as the “Odisha District Gazetteer” which is a book prepared under the government guidelines and by genuine writers. The other sources were from

528:

mentioning them as kings, maharajahs and prince, they deleted my questions and blocked my username for harrasment. They will delete this as well, but I will continue posting this message with other usernames and IP addresses until this issue is clarified. This online bullying of money swindlers

967:

I would still suggest removing the lock because there are some minor changes that must be made. Also, I am not doubting Schepnel’s work but there are a lot of things that are completely incorrect. For example, the book mentions the royal family as Rajputs but in reality they are Kshatriyas of

774:

1457:

I need an explanation on why Indian Rajputs is not a reliable website ? Which policy of Knowledge (XXG) does it breach ? It is used by numerous pages and no administrator has removed it. Therefore, if you can’t provide a proper explanation then I will have to file a complaint against you for

1961:

You've removed a lot of sourced information with the edit summary "Knowledge (XXG) does not allow the use of colonial era (pre-independence) sources. Read WP policy". Unfortunately, most of the sources removed by you are not pre-independence and the one that is colonial is probably

831:

If you were to read the sources, you would find that "little kingdom" is an aphorism coined by at least one of the authors. Once you've read the source, you'll be able to understand the context, and will be better equipped to comment on the use of that literary

1848:

The government website of Odisha itself recognises Jeypore as a princely state so there is no point of acquiring a Government certificate. If you have a problem contact the royal family via Twitter or Instagram, instead of posting nameless suggestions.

2010:

Unfortunately, your additions are not good. First, you've again removed Gajapati with the same edit summary about 1777. Are you even reading my notes above? The text clearly says that the estate was first a tributary of the Gajapati kingdom and then

1045:

In many ways, judging by some of the screams of protest that emerged in June from people claiming to be tribals from the Jeypore area, the successors to the royal dynasty of Jeypore continue that tradition of careful distribution of largesse. -

1106:

first removed the link from the citation title completely; then removed the link to a full text version and substituted a link to an abstract; then repeated the action. Each time that I've attempted to make the link to the full text version at

1739:

Page 2 mentions its status in 1803 when it recently got annexed by the British - … “ The Jeypore Zamindary Estate was the largest one of the Madras Presidency. In the “Permanent Settlement” of 1803, Jeypore tribute was set at 16,000 rupees.”

1825: 1802: 1250:

as I've already reverted the original edits, I don't feel comfortable applying a sanction, so would you be kind enough when you get a chance to review their contributions and take whatever action you think appropriate, please?

827:

So if there was a rebellion covered in reliable sources, then we should cover it too. If you have sources that describe it as "a tiny rebellion" or insignificant, then let's see them, otherwise the reliably sourced content

971:

In more than three places, he has mentioned it as a “little kingdom” although they covered an area of 26,000km2 also mentioned by him. So I don’t really get why admins are so keen on the editing and locking this article.

778:

628:

and pacific like his father, possesses a quick apprehension and extensive capacity, evinces talents for business, and is no less distinguished for sobriety and decorum of deportment than for literary acquirements...

1946:

You say "Gajapati empire finished in 1560, so how can Jeypore be tributary until 1777". However, the content you removed clearly says "that existed from the mid-15th century to 1777 CE as a tributary state of the

1951:

and following its decline retained various degrees of semi-independence until it became a vassal state of the British". It does not even remotely imply that the estate was a tributary of the Gajapati empire till

1965:

In another edit, you removed sourced content about someone named Mayanka Devi being a claimant. In a subsequent edit, you say "Where does it say that Mayanka Devi is claimant?" (it doesn't, because you removed

909:, someone will make the change for you. Make sure your suggestions are clear (as in "remove xxxx text from the article because of yyyy reason" or "add the following text to xyz section") and include sources. -- 809:

If the reliable source mentions that the royal family are Rajputs, then that is what Knowledge (XXG) reports. To take your example, if our only reliable source stated that Queen Elizabeth was descended from

836:

personally fed up of wasting my time in removing such poor content, and I have no intention of re-opening the floodgates for it to be added again. I hope you understand the position more clearly now. --

1598: 1743:

Apparently, I have read about some zamindaris that had their status promoted to that of ‘princely states’. This seems to be the case here. This zamindari must have got promoted in its later years.

1971:

These are a few examples. Much easier to revert to a clean version and I suggest you get consensus for your edits on this talk page before you try to make changes to the article going forward. --

1623:

Going into depth I feel it seems status of State was reduced to status of Zamindari in between by British, most probably after 1880 but not sure of exact dates. These are some sources I found.

2167: 2152: 558:

explain to you in person why you're mistaken about my reasons for upholding the integrity of Knowledge (XXG). You can do that politely or otherwise – either is fine with me: your choice. --

1277:

If the edits are disallowed and reverted in the same manner then I don’t think it’s the same Knowledge (XXG) that allowed editing, the current admins don’t let others work. Such a shame

1709:

I know legal case cant be considered as primary source, I have cited both type of sources in my opening remarks, however, it is not clear exact status on date of Independence of India.

1272:

Newspaper articles covering the history of the region. But for some reason RegentsPark reverted it back without giving an explanation. Are the rules meant to be different for admins ?

151:. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the 2172: 31: 2132: 2097: 927:

All of the content of Knowledge (XXG) is based on sourcing. Where a relevant claim is made in a reliable source, our article will generally report it. If you assert that

2117: 1126:

That's a link to an interstitial download page. Using the DOI link is more stable and provides the abstract at a glance, which is the standard way to link to papers.

2147: 374: 760:

particularly those dated to the Raj, which have been shown multiple times to be lacking in the basic standards required of having any reputation for accuracy. --

443: 415: 152: 147: 120: 825:"fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic." 2157: 1155:

where it is available, not just the abstract. In my version, the abstract remains available immediately from the doi for those who wish to use the doi.

817:

Please don't ascribe motive to Sitush's edits. It's not your place to comment on another editor, and I hope I don't have to warn you again about that.

1760:

I doubt it is RS as published by Indrajeet Mohanty Reader in History VD Auto College Jeypre, further in he says opposite on very 1st page (page 69)

1162:

the redundant s2cid, then I have no objection as long as you don't remove the link from the citation title to the full text. Similarly, this is in a

326: 2142: 2127: 1787:). It does not seem to be a typo because it has mentioned the neighbouring principalities like 'Parlakhemundi' as an 'estate' or zamindari ( here 1209: 350: 1899:

promoted to a lower tier princely state. It should be changed back to “Kingdom of Jeypore” as it covers the early history when it was a kingdom.

369: 234: 2112: 316: 1799: 1592: 1736:

Page 1 - “ ……This Suryavamsi rule remained for five turbulent centuries till the princely state was annexed to the state of Odisha in 1950.”

1671:

I am not sure some legal cases after independence mention as zamindari, ( cited above ) other older sources mention as State, needs research

1577:

Hi, While I have done edit to mention Jeypore as princely state There seems to be different sources claiming different status for Jeypore as

939: 660: 1883:

As a flat statement that is not correct. I notice your recent edit has removed some more recent academic sources & left far older ones!

2137: 906: 1353:

May I know why has my entire work has been reverted when I have provided a plenty of sources as per the guidelines of Knowledge (XXG) ?

2162: 1958:

The "Under the present town organisation of Nandapur...." appears to be unsourced and it is unclear what the purpose of including it is.

1019:, Cambridge University Press, 1988, ISBN 978-0-521-05372-3 - and he and Schepnel are not the only historians to have used the term. - 1824:

I just checked the second link and for some reason the full sentence is not coming up. Therefore, My advice for the second link viz.

2102: 551: 2122: 1203: 1784:

Yes, it is a matter of debate. However, I found some other government sources and websites that mentioned it as a "state" (here

988:

what it is worth, I have said somewhere recently that we probably could do with an article about the historiographic meaning of

2107: 547: 1613: 1425:

I've removed it. Please provide a reliable source that this was the actual coat of arms if you want to reinstate the image. --

490: 345: 230: 95: 1943:

You've replaced "Jeypore Zamindari" with "popularly known as Jeypore Samasthanam" (unexplained change to sourced information)

1136: 125: 69: 1480:

Indian rajputs is a fan site and the information on it is not verifiable. If you think otherwise, please post a question at

614:. To repeat what I wrote at the recent AFD: the main two sources used are unreliable and need to be removed. In particular: 291: 281: 225: 55: 2092: 202: 929:

Schnepel, Burkhard (2020) , "Kings and Tribes in East India: the Internal Poitical Dimension", in Quigley, Declan (ed.),

646:

be read uncritically or used as sources on wikipedia. Instead a good starting point for rewriting this article would be:

577: 504: 27: 1215: 1868:

Sources dating to the era of the British Raj are unreliable and not suitable to support content in Knowledge (XXG).

592:

Sources dating to the era of the British Raj are unreliable and not suitable to support content in Knowledge (XXG).

806:

It really doesn't matter what you think about Schepnel’s work, because they are a reliable source and you're not.

717: 1733:

However, it does clarify (sort of) that it was a princely state when it merged to the state of Odisha in 1950.

496: 1221: 573: 101: 651: 1993: 1931: 1904: 1873: 1854: 1692:

Even I have seen many sources mentioning it as a princely state. I’ll try to find them and get back to you.

860:

article? Much of the history predates Jeypore and is the history of the larger region. Perhaps move this to

622:(Vadivelu, 1903), which is an outright hagiographical work. Its section on the then king of Jeypore begins: 595:

There are several paragraphs and tables either entirely unsourced or cited using only unreliable sources. --

618: 1170:

to avoid harvard error false positives for editors using Ucucha's script. I hope you can respect that. --

636: 500: 493:

has been authorised by the community for pages related to South Asian social groups, including this page.

2021: 2005: 1989: 1977: 1927: 1920: 1900: 1869: 1850: 1832: 1809: 1748: 1697: 1659: 1616: 1562: 1530: 1498: 1463: 1451: 1431: 1407: 1378: 1347: 1330: 1310: 977: 915: 891: 870: 861: 784: 534: 1490:

Also, please use article talk pages for content related comments so that others can see the discussion.

681:"Durga and the King: Ethnohistorical Aspects of Politico-Ritual Life in a South Orissan Jungle Kingdom" 1798:

I have found some other sources that I previously mentioned. I am sharing it here, please have a look

1300:

the reason I gave was sock puppetry. Sock edits can be reverted without review. (And, you should read

814:, then that's what Knowledge (XXG) would write. Please let me know if that's not clear enough for you. 2074: 2050: 1197: 1192: 2065: 675:. Other writings of Burkhard Schnepel, though older and less detailed, may be easier to access, eg: 83: 20: 1926:

May I know why have you removed my edit? I am providing a legitimate source of Raphael Rousseleau.

749: 1521: 1485: 1144: 2045:

I have rewritten the controversial sections of this article. Does the article still have issues?

1769: 1714: 1676: 1634: 1361: 1282: 1132: 1034: 525: 63: 48: 1888: 1108: 1076: 1066:

I've now restored the link from the citation title to a full text version of this citation in

936: 803:

I've already explained to you how to suggest changes, why are you having difficulty with that?

700: 657: 196: 1301: 1140: 820: 2042: 2016: 1972: 1828: 1805: 1744: 1693: 1655: 1557: 1525: 1493: 1475: 1459: 1426: 1402: 1373: 1325: 1305: 1245: 1088: 1051: 1024: 1002: 973: 910: 887: 865: 798: 780: 732: 692: 530: 481: 1481: 359: 257: 219: 2070: 2046: 1948: 1256: 1175: 1116: 955: 841: 765: 600: 563: 521: 1553: 1517: 1043:

ways transmitted and legitimated through the 'gifts' he bestowed on his favoured subjects

902: 901:

You can suggest changes to the article here on the talk page and, assuming that they are

1578: 1012: 950:

are generally unreliable, and you'll need some modern scholarship to make your case. --

745: 1513: 1077:"The King's Elder Brother: Forest King and "Political Imagination" in Southern Orissa" 718:"The King's Elder Brother: Forest King and "Political Imagination" in Southern Orissa" 2086: 1765: 1710: 1672: 1644: 1630: 1391: 1357: 1295: 1278: 1128: 1103: 59: 1884: 811: 438: 434: 273: 192: 1548:

I've removed the coat of arms that someone added to the article. Please note that

427: 409: 930: 1047: 1020: 998: 1458:

continuously removing sources from one particular page as per your own wishes.

2038: 1689:

correctly stated the status of Jeypore’s neighbouring zamindaris and states.

1252: 1171: 1112: 951: 837: 761: 611: 596: 559: 263: 177: 1242:

They are also intent on emphasising the non-existent "Maharajah of Jeypore".

703: 1607: 1582: 383: 653:

The Jungle Kings: Ethnohistorical Aspects of Politics and Ritual in Orissa

335: 1484:. Generally, you should use academic sources for historical content (see 1390:

The kingdom was ruled by a dynasty who claimed to belong to the mythical

1619: 2078: 2054: 2026: 1997: 1982: 1935: 1908: 1892: 1877: 1858: 1836: 1813: 1773: 1752: 1718: 1701: 1680: 1663: 1638: 1567: 1535: 1503: 1467: 1436: 1412: 1383: 1365: 1333: 1315: 1286: 1260: 1179: 1149: 1120: 1093: 1055: 1028: 1006: 981: 959: 947: 920: 895: 875: 857: 845: 788: 769: 753: 736: 680: 604: 581: 567: 538: 1037: 1785: 1726:

I found one article, seems like it was published by the government.

1626:

Accordingly, I welcome other editors to do needed changes citing RS.

1356:

Please respond before I file a complaint for unexplained reverting.

696: 289:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 139: 114: 243: 1595: 672: 286: 1988:

I will add source now, it’s Raphael Rousseleau’s book, year 2009

2060:

Stop putting unsourced info or use Kalingapride.com as a source.

476: 77: 43: 15: 1509: 382: 358: 334: 176: 1109:

http://www.fupress.net/index.php/rss/article/view/9116/8896

864:

otherwise much of the pre 1637 content will need to go. --

495:

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the

1955:

Prince of Kashmir. I'm not going to bother with this one.

572:

Where do I sign up to be one of these paid British bots?

1388:

The Kingdom of Jeypore is not the Suryavansh dynasty so

1240:

The second one was after having received a DS/PIA alert.

1556:. "Own work" coat of arms is definitely not sourced. -- 1236: 1233: 1227: 1111:

it has been reverted and a link made to an abstract. --

187: 285:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of 1764:

linking rajas with mythological Vikramadiya, regards

1017:

The Hollow Crown: Ethnohistory of an Indian Kingdom

1552:(emphasis added) on the page must be supported by 685:The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2168:Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors 2153:C-Class Indian history articles of Low-importance 453:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors 161:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Articles for creation 2173:Knowledge (XXG) articles under general sanctions 625: 1011:To add further to the "little kingdom" point, 8: 1588:some claim to be princely state as under :- 1324:Struck through yet another sock's comment. 1232:has twice removed reliably-sourced content 886:article. I’d like to add some facts to it. 456:Template:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors 404: 214: 164:Template:WikiProject Articles for creation 145:This article was reviewed by member(s) of 109: 2133:C-Class Odisha articles of Low-importance 2098:AfC submissions by date/20 September 2019 1092: 2118:C-Class India articles of Low-importance 1394:and hence have been referred to as the 515:Paid British Bots are running this page 406: 216: 111: 81: 2148:Low-importance Indian history articles 1512:, is not reliable either. Please read 1167: 1041: 824: 1864:Adding Unreliable British Raj Sources 1762:.....till abolition of estate in 1953 7: 1508:Unfortunately, the other reference, 279:This article is within the scope of 2158:WikiProject Indian history articles 1442:Why is Indian Rajput not reliable ? 1062:Linking citation title to full text 100:It is of interest to the following 1015:wrote an entire book about them - 391:This article was last assessed in 14: 619:The aristocracy of southern India 301:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject India 191:on 20 September 2019 by reviewer 148:WikiProject Articles for creation 1040:) notes of little kingdoms that 856:Shouldn't this be a part of the 480: 426: 408: 266: 256: 242: 218: 138: 124: 113: 82: 47: 30:on 16 April 2020. The result of 19: 2143:C-Class Indian history articles 321:This article has been rated as 185:This article was accepted from 26:This article was nominated for 2128:Low-importance Odisha articles 1606:while other indicate it was a 1261:14:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC) 568:15:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC) 539:15:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC) 459:Guild of Copy Editors articles 1: 2113:Low-importance India articles 1909:11:19, 15 November 2021 (UTC) 1893:13:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC) 1878:11:39, 14 November 2021 (UTC) 1859:14:44, 3 September 2021 (UTC) 1651:other government websites). 1573:Princely State or Zamindari ? 1334:12:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC) 1316:13:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 1287:13:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 367:This article is supported by 343:This article is supported by 1081:Rivista di studi sudasiatici 1075:Rousseleau, Raphael (2009). 725:Rivista di studi sudasiatici 716:Rousseleau, Raphael (2009). 637:Nandapur: A Forsaken Kingdom 491:contentious topics procedure 370:the Indian history workgroup 2138:WikiProject Odisha articles 679:Schnepel, Burkhard (1995). 650:Schnepel, Burkhard (2002). 2189: 2163:WikiProject India articles 1585:at time of independence. 1510:http://kingdomofjeypore.in 1188:Removal of sourced content 907:WP:Policies and guidelines 497:purpose of Knowledge (XXG) 327:project's importance scale 304:Template:WikiProject India 2079:05:56, 19 July 2024 (UTC) 2027:18:16, 18 June 2022 (UTC) 1998:21:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC) 1983:20:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC) 1936:19:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC) 1837:18:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1814:18:07, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1774:12:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1753:11:46, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1719:10:40, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1702:10:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1681:10:12, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1664:09:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1639:04:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1568:19:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC) 1536:15:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC) 1504:15:17, 12 June 2021 (UTC) 1468:13:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC) 1342:Recent additions reverted 1180:22:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC) 1166:section, so it needs the 1150:21:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC) 1121:21:46, 30 July 2020 (UTC) 1056:02:02, 28 July 2020 (UTC) 1029:01:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC) 1007:01:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC) 982:01:26, 28 July 2020 (UTC) 960:23:25, 26 July 2020 (UTC) 932:The Character of Kingship 921:22:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC) 896:22:09, 26 July 2020 (UTC) 876:21:10, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 846:01:40, 28 July 2020 (UTC) 823:requires us to represent 789:00:35, 28 July 2020 (UTC) 770:02:05, 17 June 2020 (UTC) 582:08:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC) 546:I've never edited either 421: 390: 366: 342: 320: 251: 184: 133: 108: 2103:Accepted AfC submissions 2055:14:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC) 1437:19:57, 31 May 2021 (UTC) 1413:19:50, 31 May 2021 (UTC) 1384:19:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC) 1366:19:25, 31 May 2021 (UTC) 997:some degree in those. - 754:23:25, 26 May 2020 (UTC) 673:review of the above work 605:21:34, 26 May 2020 (UTC) 505:normal editorial process 2123:C-Class Odisha articles 447:, on 23 September 2021. 2108:C-Class India articles 1801:(pages 9 & 189) , 630: 520:other wiki pages like 501:standards of behaviour 387: 363: 339: 181: 90:This article is rated 2013:following its decline 1921:User talk:RegentsPark 1452:User talk:RegentsPark 1348:User talk:RegentsPark 1266:Unexplained reverting 905:and in line with our 450:Guild of Copy Editors 444:Guild of Copy Editors 416:Guild of Copy Editors 386: 362: 338: 180: 158:Articles for creation 155:for more information. 121:Articles for creation 94:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 56:proposed for deletion 2093:C-Class AfC articles 1804:(page 193), regards. 1396:Jeypore Suryavanshis 1070:for the third time: 1654:I hope that helps. 1102:In separate edits, 72:) on 16 April 2020. 1392:Suryavansh dynasty 1094:10.13128/RISS-9116 862:History of Kalinga 737:10.13128/RISS-9116 552:Muhammed Abdul Ali 526:Muhammed Abdul Ali 507:may be sanctioned. 494: 441:, a member of the 388: 364: 346:WikiProject Odisha 340: 182: 96:content assessment 2025: 1981: 1923: 1566: 1534: 1502: 1491: 1435: 1411: 1382: 1314: 941:978-1-8452-0290-3 919: 874: 662:978-81-7304-467-0 512: 511: 488: 475: 474: 471: 470: 467: 466: 433:This article was 403: 402: 399: 398: 282:WikiProject India 213: 212: 209: 208: 76: 75: 42: 41: 2180: 2019: 2009: 1975: 1918: 1789: 1788: 1560: 1554:reliable sources 1528: 1496: 1489: 1479: 1429: 1405: 1376: 1328: 1308: 1299: 1249: 1231: 1210:deleted contribs 1169: 1148: 1098: 1096: 944: 913: 903:reliably sourced 868: 802: 740: 722: 707: 666: 484: 477: 461: 460: 457: 454: 451: 430: 423: 422: 412: 405: 309: 308: 305: 302: 299: 276: 271: 270: 269: 260: 253: 252: 247: 246: 245: 240: 237: 222: 215: 190: 169: 168: 165: 162: 159: 142: 135: 134: 129: 128: 127: 117: 110: 93: 87: 86: 78: 51: 44: 23: 16: 2188: 2187: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2083: 2082: 2062: 2035: 2003: 1949:Gajapati Empire 1916: 1866: 1575: 1546: 1473: 1444: 1423: 1344: 1326: 1293: 1268: 1243: 1195: 1190: 1164:Further reading 1158:If you wish to 1127: 1074: 1068:Further reading 1064: 1033:Washbrook (see 942: 928: 883: 854: 796: 720: 715: 697:10.2307/3034233 678: 663: 649: 590: 548:Padmanabh Singh 522:Padmanabh Singh 517: 499:, any expected 489:The use of the 458: 455: 452: 449: 448: 306: 303: 300: 297: 296: 272: 267: 265: 241: 238: 228: 186: 166: 163: 160: 157: 156: 123: 91: 12: 11: 5: 2186: 2184: 2176: 2175: 2170: 2165: 2160: 2155: 2150: 2145: 2140: 2135: 2130: 2125: 2120: 2115: 2110: 2105: 2100: 2095: 2085: 2084: 2061: 2058: 2034: 2031: 2030: 2029: 1986: 1985: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1956: 1953: 1944: 1915: 1914:Jeypore Estate 1912: 1896: 1895: 1865: 1862: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1605: 1579:princely state 1574: 1571: 1545: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1443: 1440: 1422: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1343: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1319: 1318: 1267: 1264: 1189: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1156: 1100: 1099: 1063: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1031: 1013:Nicholas Dirks 1009: 990:little kingdom 965: 964: 963: 962: 940: 925: 882: 879: 853: 850: 849: 848: 833: 829: 818: 815: 807: 804: 794: 757: 756: 743: 742: 741: 710: 709: 708: 691:(1): 145–166. 669: 668: 667: 661: 643: 642: 641: 633: 632: 631: 589: 586: 585: 584: 570: 555: 544: 516: 513: 510: 509: 485: 473: 472: 469: 468: 465: 464: 462: 431: 419: 418: 413: 401: 400: 397: 396: 389: 379: 378: 375:Low-importance 365: 355: 354: 351:Low-importance 341: 331: 330: 323:Low-importance 319: 313: 312: 310: 307:India articles 278: 277: 261: 249: 248: 239:Low‑importance 223: 211: 210: 207: 206: 183: 173: 172: 170: 143: 131: 130: 118: 106: 105: 99: 88: 74: 73: 54:This page was 52: 40: 39: 32:the discussion 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2185: 2174: 2171: 2169: 2166: 2164: 2161: 2159: 2156: 2154: 2151: 2149: 2146: 2144: 2141: 2139: 2136: 2134: 2131: 2129: 2126: 2124: 2121: 2119: 2116: 2114: 2111: 2109: 2106: 2104: 2101: 2099: 2096: 2094: 2091: 2090: 2088: 2081: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2067: 2059: 2057: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2032: 2028: 2023: 2018: 2014: 2007: 2006:MasterClass8x 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1990:MasterClass8x 1984: 1979: 1974: 1970: 1964: 1960: 1957: 1954: 1950: 1945: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1928:MasterClass8x 1924: 1922: 1913: 1911: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1901:MasterClass8x 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1870:MasterClass8x 1863: 1861: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1851:MasterClass8x 1846: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1800: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1786: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1741: 1737: 1734: 1731: 1729: 1727: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1690: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1652: 1648: 1646: 1641: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1627: 1624: 1621: 1620: 1617: 1614: 1610: 1609: 1603: 1602: 1599: 1596: 1593: 1589: 1586: 1584: 1580: 1572: 1570: 1569: 1564: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1543: 1537: 1532: 1527: 1524:carefully. -- 1523: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1500: 1495: 1487: 1483: 1477: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1455: 1453: 1449: 1441: 1439: 1438: 1433: 1428: 1420: 1414: 1409: 1404: 1399: 1395: 1393: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1380: 1375: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1354: 1351: 1349: 1341: 1335: 1332: 1329: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1317: 1312: 1307: 1303: 1297: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1274: 1273: 1265: 1263: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1247: 1241: 1237: 1234: 1229: 1226: 1223: 1220: 1217: 1214: 1211: 1208: 1205: 1202: 1199: 1194: 1187: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1105: 1095: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1069: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1044: 1039: 1036: 1032: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1008: 1004: 1000: 995: 991: 986: 985: 984: 983: 979: 975: 969: 961: 957: 953: 949: 943: 938: 935:, Routledge, 934: 933: 926: 924: 923: 922: 917: 912: 908: 904: 900: 899: 898: 897: 893: 889: 880: 878: 877: 872: 867: 863: 859: 851: 847: 843: 839: 834: 830: 826: 822: 819: 816: 813: 808: 805: 800: 795: 793: 792: 791: 790: 786: 782: 776: 772: 771: 767: 763: 755: 751: 747: 744: 738: 734: 730: 726: 719: 714: 713: 711: 705: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 677: 676: 674: 670: 664: 659: 655: 654: 648: 647: 644: 639: 638: 634: 629: 624: 623: 621: 620: 616: 615: 613: 609: 608: 607: 606: 602: 598: 593: 587: 583: 579: 575: 571: 569: 565: 561: 556: 553: 549: 545: 543: 542: 541: 540: 536: 532: 527: 523: 514: 508: 506: 502: 498: 492: 486: 483: 479: 478: 463: 446: 445: 440: 436: 432: 429: 425: 424: 420: 417: 414: 411: 407: 394: 385: 381: 380: 376: 373:(assessed as 372: 371: 361: 357: 356: 352: 349:(assessed as 348: 347: 337: 333: 332: 328: 324: 318: 315: 314: 311: 294: 293: 288: 284: 283: 275: 264: 262: 259: 255: 254: 250: 236: 232: 227: 224: 221: 217: 204: 201: 198: 194: 189: 179: 175: 174: 171: 154: 150: 149: 144: 141: 137: 136: 132: 122: 119: 116: 112: 107: 103: 97: 89: 85: 80: 79: 71: 68: 65: 61: 57: 53: 50: 46: 45: 37: 33: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 2063: 2036: 2012: 1987: 1925: 1917: 1897: 1867: 1847: 1843: 1761: 1742: 1738: 1735: 1732: 1728: 1725: 1691: 1687: 1653: 1649: 1642: 1628: 1625: 1622: 1611: 1604: 1590: 1587: 1576: 1549: 1547: 1544:Coat of Arms 1456: 1447: 1445: 1424: 1421:Coat of Arms 1401:helpful. -- 1397: 1389: 1355: 1352: 1346:(Moved from 1345: 1276: 1275: 1270: 1269: 1239: 1224: 1218: 1212: 1206: 1200: 1191: 1163: 1159: 1101: 1084: 1080: 1067: 1065: 1016: 993: 989: 970: 966: 931: 884: 855: 812:Genghis Khan 777: 773: 758: 728: 724: 688: 684: 652: 635: 626: 617: 594: 591: 518: 487: 442: 392: 368: 344: 322: 292:project page 290: 280: 274:India portal 199: 167:AfC articles 153:project page 146: 102:WikiProjects 66: 35: 2043:RegentsPark 2017:RegentsPark 1973:RegentsPark 1919:Moved from 1829:Odiahistory 1806:Odiahistory 1745:Odiahistory 1694:Odiahistory 1656:Odiahistory 1558:RegentsPark 1526:RegentsPark 1494:RegentsPark 1476:RudolphHitz 1460:RudolphHitz 1450:moved from 1427:RegentsPark 1403:RegentsPark 1374:RegentsPark 1327:Doug Weller 1306:RegentsPark 1246:RegentsPark 994:little king 974:Hattershush 911:RegentsPark 888:Hattershush 866:regentspark 799:Hattershush 781:Hattershush 656:. Manohar. 610:Agree with 531:Hattershush 435:copy edited 2087:Categories 2071:Witchilich 2047:Witchilich 1550:everything 1222:block user 1216:page moves 1193:Indopaedia 881:Inaccurate 712:See also: 574:Dāsānudāsa 188:this draft 2066:DubuliRao 1608:zamindari 1583:zamindari 1522:WP:HISTRS 1486:WP:HISTRS 1228:block log 1168:|ref=none 1087:: 39–62. 746:Abecedare 731:: 39–62. 704:1359-0987 503:, or any 1766:Jethwarp 1711:Jethwarp 1673:Jethwarp 1645:Jethwarp 1631:Jethwarp 1358:Rodotype 1304:asap) -- 1296:Dersvey8 1279:Dersvey8 1204:contribs 1129:Headbomb 1104:Headbomb 554:], liar. 393:May 2023 203:contribs 70:contribs 60:Bishonen 28:deletion 2033:Rewrite 2022:comment 1978:comment 1962:kosher. 1885:Johnbod 1629:Thanks 1563:comment 1531:comment 1499:comment 1432:comment 1408:comment 1379:comment 1311:comment 1302:WP:SOCK 948:Raj era 916:comment 871:comment 858:Kalinga 852:Kalinga 832:device. 821:WP:NPOV 588:Sources 439:Dhtwiki 325:on the 235:History 193:Bkissin 92:C-class 1643:Hello 1520:, and 1482:WP:RSN 1048:Sitush 1038:312492 1021:Sitush 999:Sitush 828:stays. 231:Odisha 98:scale. 2039:RexxS 1952:1777. 1518:WP:RS 1448:Note: 1253:RexxS 1172:RexxS 1113:RexxS 1035:JSTOR 952:RexxS 838:RexxS 762:RexxS 721:(PDF) 612:RexxS 597:RexxS 560:RexxS 298:India 287:India 226:India 2075:talk 2051:talk 1994:talk 1966:it). 1932:talk 1905:talk 1889:talk 1874:talk 1855:talk 1833:talk 1810:talk 1770:talk 1749:talk 1715:talk 1698:talk 1677:talk 1660:talk 1635:talk 1514:WP:V 1464:talk 1362:talk 1331:talk 1283:talk 1257:talk 1198:talk 1176:talk 1117:talk 1052:talk 1025:talk 1003:talk 978:talk 956:talk 937:ISBN 892:talk 842:talk 785:talk 766:talk 750:talk 701:ISSN 671:See 658:ISBN 601:talk 578:talk 564:talk 535:talk 524:and 197:talk 64:talk 36:keep 34:was 1647:, 1618:3. 1615:2 1612:1. 1600:4 1597:3 1594:2. 1591:1. 1581:or 1488:). 1160:add 1089:doi 733:doi 693:doi 550:or 437:by 317:Low 58:by 2089:: 2077:) 2053:) 1996:) 1934:) 1907:) 1891:) 1876:) 1857:) 1835:) 1812:) 1772:) 1751:) 1730:] 1717:) 1700:) 1679:) 1662:) 1637:) 1516:, 1492:-- 1466:) 1454:) 1372:-- 1364:) 1350:) 1285:) 1259:) 1251:-- 1238:. 1235:, 1178:) 1143:· 1139:· 1135:· 1119:) 1083:. 1079:. 1054:) 1027:) 1005:) 992:, 980:) 958:) 894:) 844:) 787:) 768:) 752:) 727:. 723:. 699:. 687:. 683:. 603:) 580:) 566:) 537:) 377:). 353:). 233:/ 229:: 205:). 2073:( 2064:@ 2049:( 2041:@ 2037:@ 2024:) 2020:( 2008:: 2004:@ 1992:( 1980:) 1976:( 1930:( 1903:( 1887:( 1872:( 1853:( 1831:( 1808:( 1768:( 1747:( 1713:( 1696:( 1675:( 1658:( 1633:( 1565:) 1561:( 1533:) 1529:( 1501:) 1497:( 1478:: 1474:@ 1462:( 1446:( 1434:) 1430:( 1410:) 1406:( 1398:. 1381:) 1377:( 1360:( 1313:) 1309:( 1298:: 1294:@ 1281:( 1255:( 1248:: 1244:@ 1230:) 1225:· 1219:· 1213:· 1207:· 1201:· 1196:( 1174:( 1147:} 1145:b 1141:p 1137:c 1133:t 1131:{ 1115:( 1097:. 1091:: 1085:4 1050:( 1023:( 1001:( 976:( 954:( 918:) 914:( 890:( 873:) 869:( 840:( 801:: 797:@ 783:( 764:( 748:( 739:. 735:: 729:4 706:. 695:: 689:1 665:. 599:( 576:( 562:( 533:( 395:. 329:. 295:. 200:· 195:( 104:: 67:· 62:( 38:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index