660:(with an accompanying citation verifying so). To complicate matters further, there is a section further down here that has theme-specific compilations (anthologies and retrospectives). To cite my own view of them, the albums in the first section all have either previously unreleased recordings from different sources (not intended for a single album release, or assembled with new mixes and overdubbed musical parts, with a stray track here and there), which would qualify them as "compilations". I do not like the idea of trying to categorize this messy discography, but I don't like the current "studio recordings" concept either; other sections of albums here have studio recordings, too, and the second one--
386:
804:
404:
620:- A rarities compilation is a compilation that features previously unreleased and otherwise rare songs; "rare" is distinguished from "well-known" (as you said). But you rejected that proposal. In fact, strike the above: my vote is for rarities compilation or studio-recording compilations. And this RfC does not necessarily have to lead to a determination; it is just the surest way of encouraging outside opinion here.
355:
219:
545:
756:
516:
says "generally the tracks were not originally intended for release together as a single work" (with an accompanying citation to verify this definition in that article), and nearly all the first section's album articles have a source cited verifying the claim that they are compilation albums. For the
577:
In an attempt to compromise, the designations "Studio recordings", "Live albums", and "Anthologies and retrospective albums" were used. However, with no discussion, Dan56 changed "Studio recordings" to "Rarities compilations". When this was reverted, he decided to lump together all the albums that
659:
As of now, this article categorizes the first section of albums as "studio recordings" (and the accompanying infobox lists 12 studio albums, although this does not add up and appears incorrect whichever way you see it). Each of the first section's articles, however, have them filed as "compilation"
694:
It is unclear want Dan56 wants to do here: is renaming "Studio recordings" as "Compliations" just a first step to again mix all the "Anthologies and retrospective albums" together in a larger "Compilation albums"? One source used to show "Compilation albums" appears to be from a
462:
The topic of this discussion originated from a content dispute at one of these album articles, so it seems best to solicit outside opinion. How should the first section be categorized? (Feel free to come up with a different idea that has been mentioned so far, by the way)
779:
Self-published apparently, yet still discussed in an expert source, which says
Faralaco "cribbed relentlessly from" another writer and expert's work, which helped him reach the conclusion the album is a compilation. Unless, you were trying to make another point...
639:. It is, previously stated, it is an album of songs that were previously unintended to be released. The fact that it is a collection of unreleased songs gives reason to believe it is a compilation because the songs were not intended to be released together.
578:
were under the "Studio recordings" and "Anthologies and retrospective albums" into a single "Compilation albums" heading. This is confusing to the reader because leaves them unclear as to whether album is a collection of well-known
Hendrix songs (such as
822:). Unfortunately, there was relatively low participation and no consensus, despite having been relisted twice. It would be more beneficial to allow the discussion to continue at its own pace than to close it in its current state. Please let me know on
565:– Nobody can dispute that these are "recordings" that were done in a "studio". The problem with "Compilation" is that the term usually refers to "best of"- or anthology-type albums. WP FL discographies are normally divided into three album types:
325:
287:
153:
595:
I think this RfC is premature and Dan56's invitation to "Feel free to come up with a different idea that has been mentioned so far, by the way" should be explored without the pressure of having to immediately take a side and
306:
268:
720:
You are mischaracterizing the relationship between the articles and the sources supporting them as "compilations". Multiple reliable sources support the categorization, many to
Hendrix expert John McDermott;
877:, and eight months before the US release of the album, which, importantly in regard to my comment, removed three songs from the UK listing and added the three UK singles that did not appear on the UK album.
699:
517:
sake of generalizing these releases (which is the idea to begin with by having them grouped all under one section heading), "compilation" suits them better than "studio". Third-party source evidence -
857:
In some cases, the incorrect album has been cited as the source of the single. This applies particularly regarding singles released in the UK. For example, the Album citation for "Voodoo Chile" (the
725:, where you say they are "currently being disputed" (by you, only, with opinion-based claims, rather than reliable sources contradicting the sources you are trying to discredit). "Appears to be..." (
679:
This might be against the convention of these discography articles, but maybe sectioning the albums by decade of release would be simpler and avoid the overlap and question of category-definition.
44:
147:
989:
190:
963:
79:
1004:
424:
730:
999:
85:
168:
135:
911:(UK)" for the appropriate singles. Using this approach here would provide the clarification and be consistent with his lifetime discography. —
420:
411:
391:
231:. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. Once the objections have been addressed you may
994:
640:
903:
is to identify which edition of the album the single/song appears on. For example, in the Album column for his first few singles, it shows "
232:
228:
30:
569:
24:
761:) These are not exceptional claims. And so far, no evidence of third-party sources has been presented saying these are studio albums.
861:
refers to the fact it is misnamed on the record, it is "Voodoo Child (Slight Return)") / "Hey Joe" and "All Along the
Watchtower" is
129:
99:
580:
104:
20:
958:
Should a page for the new box set titled
Electric Lady Studios: A Jimi Hendrix Vision is (coming out September 13th 2024) be made?
125:
74:
366:
566:
65:
175:
873:
in the UK, it was the first single and was released in
December 1966, five months before the release of the UK version of
696:
966:, although it's missing side two of disc one), and I was wondering if a page for it should be made and added here.
539:
the first page of a new and increasingly scrambled ... the prospect of a series of such LPs (which in truth were
185:
109:
746:
644:
141:
199:
900:
372:
971:
741:
729:
it self-published?? Or are you just throwing that out there carelessly to paint a negative picture?) Even
55:
967:
70:
952:
948:
840:
823:
702:
975:
920:
893:
847:
789:
770:
714:
688:
673:
648:
629:
610:
555:
518:
494:
161:
889:
477:
466:
204:
884:
and the Album column should take that into account when referring to UK and US single releases.
827:
781:
762:
680:
665:
621:
547:
486:
203:
916:
710:
606:
513:
51:
811:
481:
470:
403:
385:
201:
458:
RfC: Should the first section of albums be categorized as "studio" or "compilation albums"?
218:
944:
833:
803:
785:
766:
722:
684:
669:
625:
586:
551:
490:
983:
885:
698:(another comments the author "John Faralaco cribs 'relentlessly from Carlyle's work'"
936:
912:
706:
664:--of these supposed "studio recordings" albums has a concert/live recording on it.
602:
940:
534:
423:. Any questions pertaining to discography-related articles should be directed to
416:
739:(whose source you claim is self-published) is a "compilation". Same case with
572:. However, Hendrix's posthumous discography is more difficult to categorize.
814:
this RfC. The RfC was explicitly created for the purpose of soliciting
751:
verifying it is a comp. The
Hendrix "expert" John McDermott verifies
415:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s collection of
880:
Basically, it boils down to there being two different versions of
419:
articles and lists. If you would like to participate please visit
818:
from uninvolved editors, and the RfC statement was open-ended (
568:
Studio albums, Live albums, and
Compilation albums, as is the
348:
205:
15:
907:(expanded CD editions with both UK and US tracks)" and "
318:
299:
280:
261:
160:
990:
Knowledge (XXG) featured list candidates (contested)
174:
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
8:
820:"Feel free to come up with a different idea"
584:) or previously unreleased songs (such as
380:
354:
352:
240:
213:
433:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Discographies
409:This article is within the scope of the
382:
819:
815:
235:the article for featured list status.
7:
869:. But "Hey Joe" was not released on
701:) and the suitability of another is
570:Template:Infobox artist discography
371:It is of interest to the following
225:Jimi Hendrix posthumous discography
25:Jimi Hendrix posthumous discography
23:for discussing improvements to the
1005:WikiProject Discographies articles
962:There's a new box set coming out (
436:Template:WikiProject Discographies
14:
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
802:
402:
384:
353:
217:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1000:List-Class Discography articles
931:Hendrix plays on one track of '
473:) at 09:38, 14 July 2019 (UTC).
484:) at 04:35, 2 June 2019 (UTC).
338:Former featured list candidate
1:
853:Singles Section: Album Column
848:16:59, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
723:multiple in even one instance
510:Studio-recording compilations
42:Put new text under old text.
995:Old requests for peer review
953:13:37, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
695:vanity/self-published source
921:14:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
894:16:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
531:Rough Guide to Jimi Hendrix
1021:
976:21:17, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
790:20:26, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
771:20:06, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
715:15:11, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
689:21:04, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
674:20:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
630:20:10, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
611:15:11, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
556:21:19, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
495:20:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
935:, an archival release by
412:Discographies WikiProject
397:
379:
335:
243:
239:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
901:Jimi Hendrix discography
703:currently being disputed
742:People, Hell and Angels
649:17:24, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
529:and similar LPs in his
425:the project's talk page
326:Featured list candidate
288:Featured list candidate
229:featured list candidate
899:The approach taken on
826:if you would prefer a
361:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
365:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
100:Neutral point of view
637:Rarities compilation
506:Rarities compilation
439:Discography articles
105:No original research
905:Are You Experienced
882:Are You Experienced
875:Are You Experienced
871:Are You Experienced
867:Are You Experienced
748:American Songwriter
519:Ritchie Unterberger
737:Valleys of Neptune
367:content assessment
244:Article milestones
86:dispute resolution
47:
863:Electric Ladyland
845:
816:"outside opinion"
563:Studio recordings
514:Compilation album
485:
474:
455:
454:
451:
450:
447:
446:
347:
346:
343:
342:
319:February 23, 2015
300:December 19, 2014
212:
211:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1012:
926:
843:
839:
836:
812:request to close
810:I've declined a
806:
758:Ultimate Hendrix
755:is also a comp (
544:
476:RfC relisted by
475:
465:RfC relisted by
464:
441:
440:
437:
434:
431:
421:the project page
406:
399:
398:
388:
381:
364:
358:
357:
356:
349:
336:Current status:
321:
302:
283:
264:
241:
221:
214:
206:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1011:
1010:
1009:
980:
979:
960:
929:
855:
841:
834:
800:
657:
641:173.167.211.241
587:The Cry of Love
537:The Cry of Love
523:The Cry of Love
502:
460:
438:
435:
432:
429:
428:
362:
317:
298:
279:
260:
208:
207:
202:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1018:
1016:
1008:
1007:
1002:
997:
992:
982:
981:
959:
956:
928:
925:
924:
923:
854:
851:
828:"no consensus"
799:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
774:
773:
692:
691:
662:Rainbow Bridge
656:
653:
652:
651:
633:
632:
614:
613:
598:
597:
592:
591:
574:
573:
559:
558:
527:Rainbow Bridge
521:, speaking on
501:
498:
459:
456:
453:
452:
449:
448:
445:
444:
442:
407:
395:
394:
389:
377:
376:
370:
359:
345:
344:
341:
340:
333:
332:
329:
322:
314:
313:
310:
303:
295:
294:
291:
284:
276:
275:
272:
265:
262:April 20, 2014
257:
256:
253:
250:
246:
245:
237:
236:
222:
210:
209:
200:
198:
197:
194:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1017:
1006:
1003:
1001:
998:
996:
993:
991:
988:
987:
985:
978:
977:
973:
969:
968:ItsMichaelRay
965:
957:
955:
954:
950:
946:
942:
938:
934:
922:
918:
914:
910:
906:
902:
898:
897:
896:
895:
891:
887:
883:
878:
876:
872:
868:
864:
860:
852:
850:
849:
846:
844:
838:
837:
829:
825:
821:
817:
813:
809:
805:
797:
791:
787:
783:
778:
777:
776:
775:
772:
768:
764:
760:
759:
754:
750:
749:
744:
743:
738:
734:
733:
732:Rolling Stone
728:
724:
719:
718:
717:
716:
712:
708:
704:
700:
697:
690:
686:
682:
678:
677:
676:
675:
671:
667:
663:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
635:
634:
631:
627:
623:
619:
616:
615:
612:
608:
604:
600:
599:
594:
593:
589:
588:
583:
582:
576:
575:
571:
567:
564:
561:
560:
557:
553:
549:
546:
542:
538:
532:
528:
524:
520:
515:
511:
507:
504:
503:
499:
497:
496:
492:
488:
483:
479:
472:
468:
457:
443:
430:Discographies
426:
422:
418:
414:
413:
408:
405:
401:
400:
396:
393:
392:Discographies
390:
387:
383:
378:
374:
368:
360:
351:
350:
339:
334:
330:
328:
327:
323:
320:
316:
315:
311:
309:
308:
304:
301:
297:
296:
292:
290:
289:
285:
282:
278:
277:
273:
271:
270:
266:
263:
259:
258:
254:
251:
248:
247:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
215:
196:
195:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
961:
937:Robert Wyatt
932:
930:
908:
904:
881:
879:
874:
870:
866:
862:
858:
856:
832:
831:
824:my talk page
807:
801:
757:
752:
747:
740:
736:
731:
726:
693:
661:
658:
636:
617:
585:
581:Kiss the Sky
579:
562:
541:compilations
540:
536:
530:
526:
522:
509:
505:
461:
410:
373:WikiProjects
337:
331:Not promoted
324:
305:
293:Not promoted
286:
281:June 8, 2014
267:
227:is a former
224:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
830:closure. —
417:discography
307:Peer review
269:Peer review
148:free images
31:not a forum
984:Categories
945:Bondegezou
909:Smash Hits
835:Newslinger
753:War Heroes
655:Discussion
543:) viable."
363:List-class
927:Wyatt '68
735:verifies
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
886:Mickraus
808:Comment:
312:Reviewed
274:Reviewed
233:resubmit
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
913:Ojorojo
707:Ojorojo
618:Comment
603:Ojorojo
533:, said
252:Process
154:WP refs
142:scholar
964:Source
939:: see
478:Cunard
467:Cunard
369:scale.
255:Result
126:Google
798:Notes
782:Dan56
763:Dan56
681:Dan56
666:Dan56
622:Dan56
596:vote.
548:Dan56
500:Votes
487:Dan56
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
972:talk
949:talk
941:here
917:talk
890:talk
865:and
842:talk
786:talk
767:talk
745:and
711:talk
685:talk
670:talk
645:talk
626:talk
607:talk
552:talk
491:talk
482:talk
471:talk
249:Date
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
859:sic
705:. —
508:or
176:TWL
986::
974:)
951:)
943:.
933:68
919:)
892:)
788:)
769:)
727:Is
713:)
687:)
672:)
647:)
628:)
609:)
590:).
554:)
525:,
512:-
493:)
156:)
54:;
970:(
947:(
915:(
888:(
784:(
765:(
709:(
683:(
668:(
643:(
624:(
605:(
601:—
550:(
535:"
489:(
480:(
469:(
427:.
375::
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
