94:. But these are not the internationally recognised borders of Israel. The image suggests that the Golan Heights, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and East Jerusalem are integral parts of the state of Israel, whereas this is subject to international disputes. To present these borders as undisputed facts, is to lessen the quality of information provided by Knowledge. I therefore decided to remove this image. In a (very swift) reaction by a Knowledge administrator, he accused me of "blatant vandalism". That is absurd. I'm in the habit of using Knowledge as a source of factual, unbiased information. Ocasionally, I make a small contribution to try to enhance the factual accuracy of an article. To enhance an article is not vandalism. It is what I thought Knowledge was all about. There are undoubtedly many images available that could be used in these articles that depict the borders of Israel, while clearly marking the disputed Palestinian Territories and the Golan Heights as disputed entities. Why would an unbiased encyclopedia, out of of all the available options, choose an image that is provided by the Israeli Foreign Ministry? If it is Knowledge's standard policy to discourage user participation in this agressive way, then in my view, it fails in its stated purpose. --
31:
143:
Thanks for opening that Image talk page and for your comment. But I would also have to disagree with you on multiple postings. There is a good reason to place multiple postings. Many users only view one of the involved pages. If they wish to see whether there are differences of opinion on the article
144:
they are reading, they have a right to a complete overview. Now if they would happen to forget to click on the image itself (and subsequently on its Image talk page), but instead would only view this discussion page, they would be denied that complete overview, if there were no multiple postings. --
74:
I object to the use of the image containing the map of the
Hasmonean Kingdom set against the background of the so-called present-day borders of Israel. The image is also being used in the articles on
38:
129:
145:
95:
113:
47:
17:
125:
105:
159:
There are two different spellings for Judas' father's name: Mathathias and
Mattathias.
117:
109:
83:
163:
148:
136:
98:
121:
91:
160:
133:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
87:
79:
75:
25:
104:
please do not double post. you have left this comment at
8:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
70:Objection to the use of this image
24:
29:
1:
149:17:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
137:14:13, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
130:Image talk:Hasmonean-map.jpg
99:13:41, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
179:
164:03:09, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
128:. I have moved it to
42:of past discussions.
114:Talk:Judas Maccabeus
18:Talk:Judas Maccabeus
126:Talk:Jewish history
106:talk:Golan Heights
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
170:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
178:
177:
173:
172:
171:
169:
168:
167:
157:
72:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
176:
174:
156:
153:
152:
151:
140:
139:
118:Talk:Maccabees
110:Talk:Hasmonean
84:Jewish history
71:
68:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
175:
166:
165:
162:
154:
150:
147:
146:82.215.24.131
142:
141:
138:
135:
131:
127:
123:
122:Talk:Hanukkah
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
102:
101:
100:
97:
96:82.215.24.131
93:
92:Golan Heights
89:
85:
81:
77:
69:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
158:
73:
60:
43:
37:
90:and on the
36:This is an
88:Hasmonean
80:Maccabees
61:ArchiveĀ 1
155:Untitled
76:Hanukkah
39:archive
161:Aligma
134:Jon513
124:, and
86:, on
82:, on
78:, on
16:<
132:.
120:,
116:,
112:,
108:,
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.