311:
1001:, in the subdivided areas where Junagadh and Manavadar are transcribed. Note the two effectively Indian 'exclaves' on both maps, which are surrounded by Junagadh but not part of its territory. On the Pakistani map, the solid green line represents the boundary of Pakistani provinces, and it is present on the outline of Junagadh. The solid yellow line represents the Indian boundary/territory. For clarity, I will agree to the above and support adding the category on the
505:
555:
537:
802:, as it is quite misleading. Note that the delimited area on the political map labels both Junagadh and Manavadar as part of the territory claimed/disputed. This is important to note in the article as it relates to a government's official position, and as such would be disruptive to entirely omit. My edit had mentioned the issue in the Annexation section, in order to assuage your concern on mentioning it in the
192:, i have mentioned other authentic sources like Gazetteer_of_the_Bombay_Presidency , which is a government press release , kindly refer page no 110 TO 150 & Page no 419 of Gazetteer_of_the_Bombay_Presidency , this information is more relevant to this topic , in previous content chudasama referred as Ahirs which is irrelevant , that is why i have corrected it , Please review it again.
379:
1097:
344:
457:
302:
389:
481:
944:
That would be an incorrect categorization as that princely state is no longer extant and this category is for current disputes (you cannot have disputes on non-existent entities/territories). Now that I think about it, this is probably the best place to put the cat as most people are likely to end up
831:
I am not sure how my edit is misleading as I was only asking for discussion for a cat on a claim that is not new. Firstly, the claim is not limited to the city on which the cat is being added, we should be careful with adding that cat to territories below admin level 1; secondly, the dispute is not a
902:
What I'd like to clarify here is where do we add the category exactly, should we add it here , to all the places claimed (which would be overdoing it) or simply to the district. If you are fine with having it only here, I'll self revert my edit.
1101:
226:
for the acceptable sources. In any case, I have reverted your contribution because it was incomprehensible. Please use your sandbox to experiment and polish the content before attempting to addit again. --
853:: Could you provide an existing precedent or supporting policy regarding the categorisation. AFAIK, that is not how this category is used. Also note that whether a dispute is "active" or not active is
103:
I have uploaded three images in this aricles, which are desperately needed. I also arranged history of junagadh. Please search more information of this beautiful city and add in this articles
1295:
1280:
1240:
1205:
1102:
https://www.ndu.edu.pk/issra/pub/insight/2023/Junagadh-Manavadar-A-Story-of-India%E2%80%99s-Illegal-Occupation/Junagadh-Manavadar-A-Story-of-India%E2%80%99s-Illegal-Occupation.html
47:
Nope - that is an urban legend. "Juna" as used in
Junagadh has nothing to do with "Yona" or "Yavana". In Sorathi, or the colloquially spoken gujarati, it translates as "Old fort".
1260:
283:
1225:
315:
1275:
519:
960:
Ok, fine by me. But only one entry for
Junagadh. Somebody looking at the category page shouldn't have to sort out which of them is the real place that is disputed.
1235:
1195:
733:
729:
715:
623:
619:
605:
471:
1127:
text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of
1285:
1210:
1245:
570:
542:
1255:
1190:
495:
1270:
1113:
1230:
1200:
1220:
945:
here and this is the main article of the dispute. Placing it on the district doesn't cut it either as the claims are larger than the district.
447:
437:
218:
There is nothing "authentic". Government sources even less so. British Raj sources which basically collected folklore are terrible. Please see
159:
Given the poor sources used, I'm not sure it should remain. The previous content seems slightly better sourced, but it's unclear from a glance.
1265:
284:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090223182107/http://projectsouthasia.sdstate.edu/Docs/HISTORY/PRIMARYDOCS/EPIGRAPHY/JunagadhRockInscription.htm
1162:
from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.
514:
362:
1290:
466:
354:
118:
22:
287:
1250:
711:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
293:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
997:, there is a delimitation of the Junagadh region, and Manavadar is also labeled within the close-up map. The map is analogous to
207:
148:
81:
Fixed the grammatical tones in some paras. Was moving to present tense from past tense. The tense is correct and consistent now.
1215:
1185:
701:
1167:
490:
358:
776:
666:
324:
857:; that is what the sources and the government's claims would determine, for which there is obviously enough material.
412:
402:
349:
133:
previous information regarding this topic was bias , so i have corrected it , kindly don't remove my edits , thanks
806:
while reverting someone else. Also, the category is well-sourced and meets the criteria used for other articles e.g.
89:
Some references have been supplied, so I removed the unreferenced tag today. Many more verifiable facts are needed.
1163:
1159:
1100:
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from:
732:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
622:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1072:
967:
as a page. That can also have the category, because it was apparently regarded as a separate state in 1947. --
1139:
properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original
998:
767:
693:
657:
275:
114:
1150:
for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Knowledge takes copyright violations
689:
26:
751:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
739:
641:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
629:
330:
692:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
274:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1143:
1124:
1120:
203:
195:
144:
136:
106:
1071:
For anyone wanting to list this as an active or even a (major) dispute at all, see the consensus at
301:
1109:
1034:
972:
926:
882:
232:
288:
http://projectsouthasia.sdstate.edu/Docs/HISTORY/PRIMARYDOCS/EPIGRAPHY/JunagadhRockInscription.htm
1146:
from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our
1104:. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored,
1080:
950:
908:
841:
807:
110:
736:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
626:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
752:
642:
990:
170:
163:
986:
964:
223:
759:
702:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120326005939/http://www.hellojunagadh.com/history_letter.aspx
649:
504:
1052:
1018:
866:
819:
199:
140:
63:
1030:
982:
981:
Thanks. In principle, the territory in contention corresponds to that of the erstwhile
968:
922:
918:
893:
878:
833:
718:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
608:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
246:
228:
178:
758:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
648:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1179:
1147:
1076:
946:
904:
850:
837:
793:
90:
1135:, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and
1136:
854:
705:
565:
561:
394:
219:
1108:
it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see
554:
536:
1096:
725:
615:
877:
I don't see a problem with the category "Territorial disputes of
Pakistan". --
1045:
1011:
897:
859:
812:
724:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
614:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
384:
1006:
242:
241:
I'd expect that detailed, academic histories should be available for use. --
189:
174:
21:
should have separate page for the old kingdom and its modern day location --
480:
456:
378:
343:
921:
page. To do anything more would need a discussion at the WikiProjects. --
1132:
1002:
685:
267:
166:. Given you've written that with no others' involvement, it's of no help.
954:
825:
76:
994:
410:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the
407:
41:
1171:
1084:
1058:
1038:
1024:
976:
930:
912:
886:
872:
845:
781:
671:
250:
236:
211:
182:
152:
122:
93:
66:
30:
989:
states. Manavadar, as is understood, is presently part of the
295:
162:
What's presented in this article should accurately summarize
503:
479:
455:
696:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
278:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1112:
if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or
803:
799:
271:
832:
active dispute as well. I would also like to include
40:
Is it true that the original name meant "city of the
728:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
618:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
173:
reviewed, and incorporating the removed sources. --
55:Yavana, Jana, Gyan, Dnyan, all have some relation.
836:in the discussion on if and where to put the cat.
1296:Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
1281:C-Class Indian history articles of Mid-importance
1241:C-Class Indian cities articles of Mid-importance
706:http://www.hellojunagadh.com/history_letter.aspx
406:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of
1029:Ok, I added the category to both the pages. --
714:This message was posted before February 2018.
604:This message was posted before February 2018.
1206:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Geography
8:
1261:C-Class Gujarat articles of High-importance
580:Knowledge:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
684:I have just modified one external link on
583:Template:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
531:
338:
266:I have just modified one external link on
193:
134:
1226:C-Class India articles of Mid-importance
533:
340:
299:
1276:Mid-importance Indian history articles
1236:Mid-importance Indian cities articles
1196:Knowledge vital articles in Geography
1110:"using copyrighted works from others"
17:Separate page for Kingdom of Junagadh
7:
1073:Talk:Pakistan/Archive 21#RfC for map
400:This article is within the scope of
1286:WikiProject Indian history articles
1211:C-Class vital articles in Geography
329:It is of interest to the following
1246:WikiProject Indian cities articles
855:not something that we would decide
14:
798:Will you please self-revert your
688:. Please take a moment to review
270:. Please take a moment to review
1256:High-importance Gujarat articles
1191:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
1114:"donating copyrighted materials"
1095:
993:. In the enlarged map available
553:
535:
387:
377:
342:
309:
300:
1271:C-Class Indian history articles
917:Evidently, it should go in the
442:This article has been rated as
1231:C-Class Indian cities articles
1201:C-Class level-5 vital articles
586:Guild of Copy Editors articles
1:
1221:Mid-importance India articles
512:This article is supported by
488:This article is supported by
464:This article is supported by
123:10:46, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
1266:WikiProject Gujarat articles
782:20:01, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
515:the Indian history workgroup
251:15:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
237:20:06, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
212:17:22, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
183:16:21, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
153:15:36, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
1154:, and persistent violators
422:Knowledge:WikiProject India
129:Corrected Chudasama history
67:08:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
1312:
1291:WikiProject India articles
1172:18:37, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
1148:guideline on non-free text
1059:14:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
1039:09:18, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
1025:04:16, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
977:17:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
955:16:11, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
931:13:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
913:07:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
887:06:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
873:04:46, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
846:04:22, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
826:04:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
745:(last update: 5 June 2024)
681:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
672:13:00, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
635:(last update: 5 June 2024)
448:project's importance scale
425:Template:WikiProject India
263:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
99:Three new images are added
31:22:58, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
1091:Copyright problem removed
574:, on 7–21 September 2019.
548:
511:
487:
467:WikiProject Indian cities
463:
441:
372:
337:
1251:C-Class Gujarat articles
1131:, and, if allowed under
1085:04:44, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
94:01:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
51:Yavana,Jana, Gyan, Dnyan
677:External links modified
259:External links modified
1216:C-Class India articles
1186:C-Class vital articles
786:
508:
484:
460:
577:Guild of Copy Editors
571:Guild of Copy Editors
543:Guild of Copy Editors
507:
483:
459:
316:level-5 vital article
1164:GreenLipstickLesbian
726:regular verification
616:regular verification
1123:, we cannot accept
716:After February 2018
606:After February 2018
491:WikiProject Gujarat
963:I noticed we have
808:Kalapani territory
770:InternetArchiveBot
721:InternetArchiveBot
660:InternetArchiveBot
611:InternetArchiveBot
568:, a member of the
509:
485:
461:
325:content assessment
169:I suggest getting
991:Junagadh district
787:Gotitbro's revert
746:
636:
602:
601:
598:
597:
594:
593:
560:This article was
530:
529:
526:
525:
403:WikiProject India
214:
198:comment added by
171:Chudasama Dynasty
164:Chudasama Dynasty
155:
139:comment added by
125:
109:comment added by
1303:
1099:
1055:
1048:
1021:
1014:
987:Bantva Manavadar
965:Bantva Manavadar
901:
869:
862:
822:
815:
797:
780:
771:
744:
743:
722:
670:
661:
634:
633:
612:
588:
587:
584:
581:
578:
557:
550:
549:
539:
532:
430:
429:
426:
423:
420:
397:
392:
391:
390:
381:
374:
373:
368:
365:
346:
339:
322:
313:
312:
305:
304:
296:
104:
1311:
1310:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1176:
1175:
1093:
1053:
1046:
1019:
1012:
891:
867:
860:
820:
813:
791:
789:
774:
769:
737:
730:have permission
720:
694:this simple FaQ
679:
664:
659:
627:
620:have permission
610:
585:
582:
579:
576:
575:
496:High-importance
427:
424:
421:
418:
417:
393:
388:
386:
366:
352:
323:on Knowledge's
320:
310:
276:this simple FaQ
261:
131:
101:
87:
53:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1309:
1307:
1299:
1298:
1293:
1288:
1283:
1278:
1273:
1268:
1263:
1258:
1253:
1248:
1243:
1238:
1233:
1228:
1223:
1218:
1213:
1208:
1203:
1198:
1193:
1188:
1178:
1177:
1152:very seriously
1092:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
961:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
919:Junagadh State
788:
785:
764:
763:
756:
709:
708:
700:Added archive
678:
675:
654:
653:
646:
600:
599:
596:
595:
592:
591:
589:
558:
546:
545:
540:
528:
527:
524:
523:
520:Mid-importance
510:
500:
499:
486:
476:
475:
472:Mid-importance
462:
452:
451:
444:Mid-importance
440:
434:
433:
431:
428:India articles
399:
398:
382:
370:
369:
367:Mid‑importance
347:
335:
334:
328:
306:
291:
290:
282:Added archive
260:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
186:
185:
167:
160:
130:
127:
100:
97:
86:
83:
74:
73:
72:
71:
70:
69:
52:
49:
37:
34:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1308:
1297:
1294:
1292:
1289:
1287:
1284:
1282:
1279:
1277:
1274:
1272:
1269:
1267:
1264:
1262:
1259:
1257:
1254:
1252:
1249:
1247:
1244:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1232:
1229:
1227:
1224:
1222:
1219:
1217:
1214:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1204:
1202:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1192:
1189:
1187:
1184:
1183:
1181:
1174:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1121:legal reasons
1117:
1116:if you are.)
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1098:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1069:
1060:
1056:
1050:
1049:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1022:
1016:
1015:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
988:
984:
980:
979:
978:
974:
970:
966:
962:
959:
958:
957:
956:
952:
948:
932:
928:
924:
920:
916:
915:
914:
910:
906:
899:
895:
890:
889:
888:
884:
880:
876:
875:
874:
870:
864:
863:
856:
852:
849:
848:
847:
843:
839:
835:
830:
829:
828:
827:
823:
817:
816:
809:
805:
801:
795:
784:
783:
778:
773:
772:
761:
757:
754:
750:
749:
748:
741:
735:
731:
727:
723:
717:
712:
707:
703:
699:
698:
697:
695:
691:
687:
682:
676:
674:
673:
668:
663:
662:
651:
647:
644:
640:
639:
638:
631:
625:
621:
617:
613:
607:
590:
573:
572:
567:
563:
559:
556:
552:
551:
547:
544:
541:
538:
534:
521:
518:(assessed as
517:
516:
506:
502:
501:
497:
494:(assessed as
493:
492:
482:
478:
477:
473:
470:(assessed as
469:
468:
458:
454:
453:
449:
445:
439:
436:
435:
432:
415:
414:
409:
405:
404:
396:
385:
383:
380:
376:
375:
371:
364:
360:
356:
351:
348:
345:
341:
336:
332:
326:
318:
317:
307:
303:
298:
297:
294:
289:
285:
281:
280:
279:
277:
273:
269:
264:
258:
252:
248:
244:
240:
239:
238:
234:
230:
225:
221:
217:
216:
215:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
191:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
161:
158:
157:
156:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
128:
126:
124:
120:
116:
112:
111:Jadia gaurang
108:
98:
96:
95:
92:
84:
82:
79:
78:
68:
65:
62:
61:
60:
59:
58:
57:
56:
50:
48:
45:
43:
35:
33:
32:
28:
24:
16:
1155:
1151:
1140:
1128:
1118:
1105:
1094:
1044:
1010:
943:
858:
811:
790:
768:
765:
740:source check
719:
713:
710:
683:
680:
658:
655:
630:source check
609:
603:
569:
513:
489:
465:
443:
413:project page
411:
401:
395:India portal
331:WikiProjects
314:
292:
265:
262:
194:— Preceding
187:
135:— Preceding
132:
102:
88:
80:
75:
54:
46:
39:
23:80.1.250.215
20:
1129:information
1125:copyrighted
562:copy edited
105:—Preceding
1180:Categories
1144:plagiarize
1137:referenced
1009:articles.
777:Report bug
667:Report bug
200:Raakuldeep
141:Raakuldeep
85:References
1031:Kautilya3
1007:Manavadar
969:Kautilya3
923:Kautilya3
894:Kautilya3
879:Kautilya3
834:Kautilya3
760:this tool
753:this tool
650:this tool
643:this tool
319:is rated
229:Kautilya3
224:WP:HISTRS
1133:fair use
1077:Gotitbro
1043:Cheers.
1003:Junagadh
999:this one
983:Junagadh
947:Gotitbro
905:Gotitbro
851:Gotitbro
838:Gotitbro
794:Gotitbro
766:Cheers.—
686:Junagadh
656:Cheers.—
268:Junagadh
208:contribs
196:unsigned
149:contribs
137:unsigned
119:contribs
107:unsigned
91:Fconaway
1160:blocked
690:my edit
566:Dhtwiki
446:on the
363:History
359:Gujarat
321:C-class
272:my edit
77:Abhijna
1106:unless
355:Cities
327:scale.
188:Dear @
64:vkvora
1047:Mar4d
1013:Mar4d
898:Mar4d
861:Mar4d
814:Mar4d
419:India
408:India
350:India
308:This
220:WP:RS
42:Yonas
36:Yonas
1168:talk
1156:will
1119:For
1081:talk
1054:talk
1035:talk
1020:talk
1005:and
995:here
985:and
973:talk
951:talk
927:talk
909:talk
896:and
883:talk
868:talk
842:talk
821:talk
804:lead
800:edit
247:talk
243:Ronz
233:talk
222:and
204:talk
190:Ronz
179:talk
175:Ronz
145:talk
115:talk
27:talk
1158:be
734:RfC
704:to
624:RfC
564:by
438:Mid
286:to
44:"?
1182::
1170:)
1141:or
1083:)
1075:.
1057:)
1037:)
1023:)
975:)
953:)
929:)
911:)
885:)
871:)
844:)
824:)
810:.
747:.
742:}}
738:{{
637:.
632:}}
628:{{
522:).
498:).
474:).
361:/
357:/
353::
249:)
235:)
210:)
206:•
181:)
151:)
147:•
121:)
117:•
29:)
1166:(
1079:(
1051:(
1033:(
1017:(
971:(
949:(
925:(
907:(
900::
892:@
881:(
865:(
840:(
818:(
796::
792:@
779:)
775:(
762:.
755:.
669:)
665:(
652:.
645:.
450:.
416:.
333::
245:(
231:(
202:(
177:(
143:(
113:(
25:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.