247:
219:
601:
is pretty reliable, though it's not the strongest source. Maybe we can find other citations that reviewed this draft script to ensure that there is consistency in the plot analysis. Otherwise, this plot hole could've been part of the reason why there was yet further work done on the script in 2005.
302:
I've completely revised the article to purge it of all speculative and irrelevant information. For instance, the script review was removed because the information I've newly inserted indicates that the script had gone through major changes by
February 2006. Thus, a review of an outdated script is
303:
not encyclopedic. A timeline has now been established of the film's development, the last of which was actually mentioned in July 2006 by
Spielberg. I'm not convinced that an article on this film should exist, but I'd rather have verifiable, well-structured information than what existed before. —
773:
Nothing says it will. It isn't in production, they have no idea when they will be in production. They keep writing and denying scripts. They mention Joe
Johnston directing, but nothing has been made official. They have no idea when it will be released. So...no, it isn't going to be a film soon.
361:
Actually, this is all the concrete information there is about it that I could find. Production has not actually begun yet, which is why I voted for deletion in this article's AfD discussion. The film is in development in 2007, just as it was in 2002. As you can see, the release date has been
580:
Is that second draft script reliable? The can of DNA could only survive for 24 hours (per JP1: "there is enough coolant inside for 24 hours. The embryos have to be back in San Jose by then.") Seeing as this is about 14 years later in the timeline, I doubt it'll work. —
330:
Some possible improvements for the article could be: add more info on the film itself (if possible), not place so much emphasis on all the talk about it, andget less abstract info (talk) and more concrete info (what has happened and what will happen with the film.)
659:(which I think maybe should be retitled "film series", unless it is meant to contain more than just information on the films) was the proposed article. It needs to be developed to include some info on the previous 3 films, kind of like
153:
257:
696:
From reading the opening section, it's the novels, the games, the entire franchise. Granted, the films and novels will probably have the biggest sections as they are what is most well known.
229:
147:
79:
799:
Two people agreeing is not a good enough consensus to merge an article. This article should not have been merged without more people agreeing to do so.--
278:
646:
The suggestion of merging was brought up in the recent AFD, and I was wondering what people would have in mind for a target article to merge into. --
44:
85:
624:
I'll admit, that post was mostly just to comment on the blatant plot hole :). But indeed; another citation for the script would be a good idea. —
475:
How can the infobox declare
Johnston the director when the article itself says that he's only a possibility that was seconded by Spielberg?
753:
Isn't this going to be a film soon? If so, then it merits its own article and will easily be fleshed in further as the film comes out. --
30:
407:
350:
615:
556:
456:
375:
316:
99:
282:
104:
20:
74:
190:
168:
611:
552:
452:
371:
312:
135:
65:
490:
402:
345:
253:
225:
185:
129:
109:
199:
125:
656:
397:
340:
660:
754:
509:
55:
286:
175:
362:
changed several times, so there's no telling if the film will actually enter production anytime soon. —
70:
729:
Yeah, the page could grow to be a very well rounded article, if we all work together for its benefit.
246:
218:
804:
629:
603:
597:
586:
567:
544:
444:
363:
304:
161:
388:
Ok. That makes sense. Still, as soon as more info appears, you may want to add it to the article.
607:
548:
521:
448:
389:
367:
332:
308:
204:
513:
787:
742:
709:
676:
483:
141:
51:
275:
I put it in again, but why did someone erase it in the first place? Are you a troll or what?
201:
24:
534:
800:
721:
688:
647:
626:
583:
433:
to keep an eye out for headlines on upcoming films like these. Just this morning, I
426:
776:
731:
698:
665:
476:
434:
439:
203:
808:
793:
757:
748:
724:
715:
691:
682:
650:
633:
619:
590:
570:
560:
497:
460:
412:
379:
355:
320:
290:
430:
566:
It made the main page on
Comingsoon.net, so I guess it's reliable.
543:
Not sure how reliable or significant this is, but there ya go. —
241:
213:
205:
15:
160:
174:
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
8:
271:Why did someone erase the script review?
530:
519:
7:
228:on 19 February 2007. The result of
23:for discussing improvements to the
687:Hmm, the novels too, I hope :) --
14:
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
437:that there's a screenwriter for
245:
217:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
252:This article was nominated for
224:This article was nominated for
256:on 30 May 2007. The result of
1:
498:18:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
461:16:46, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
413:16:43, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
380:16:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
356:16:43, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
321:17:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
291:00:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
42:Put new text under old text.
825:
634:08:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
620:19:01, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
591:18:31, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
571:08:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
561:19:29, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
809:06:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
794:00:04, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
758:00:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
749:23:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
725:23:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
716:23:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
692:23:26, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
683:19:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
651:19:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
503:Ellie Sattler returning?
425:Yep, I plan to. I have
657:Jurassic Park franchise
510:"JURASSIC PARK IV News"
661:Spider-Man film series
529:Check date values in:
75:avoid personal attacks
720:I like this idea. --
326:Possible Improvements
281:comment was added by
100:Neutral point of view
105:No original research
598:Ain't It Cool News
86:dispute resolution
47:
790:
783:
745:
738:
712:
705:
679:
672:
294:
268:
267:
240:
239:
212:
211:
66:Assume good faith
43:
816:
792:
788:
785:
781:
777:
747:
743:
740:
736:
732:
714:
710:
707:
703:
699:
681:
677:
674:
670:
666:
576:Reliable source?
538:
532:
527:
525:
517:
512:. Collider.com.
495:
488:
480:
443:. Cool stuff. —
410:
405:
400:
395:
392:
353:
348:
343:
338:
335:
298:Article revision
276:
249:
242:
221:
214:
206:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
25:Jurassic Park IV
16:
824:
823:
819:
818:
817:
815:
814:
813:
786:
779:
775:
741:
734:
730:
708:
701:
697:
675:
668:
664:
644:
578:
528:
518:
508:
505:
491:
484:
478:
473:
408:
403:
398:
393:
390:
351:
346:
341:
336:
333:
328:
300:
277:—The preceding
273:
208:
207:
202:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
822:
820:
812:
811:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
755:164.107.222.23
643:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
577:
574:
568:Alientraveller
564:
563:
540:
539:
504:
501:
472:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
418:
417:
416:
415:
383:
382:
327:
324:
299:
296:
272:
269:
266:
265:
258:the discussion
250:
238:
237:
230:the discussion
222:
210:
209:
200:
198:
197:
194:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
821:
810:
806:
802:
798:
797:
796:
795:
791:
784:
782:
759:
756:
752:
751:
750:
746:
739:
737:
728:
727:
726:
723:
719:
718:
717:
713:
706:
704:
695:
694:
693:
690:
686:
685:
684:
680:
673:
671:
662:
658:
655:
654:
653:
652:
649:
641:
635:
632:
631:
628:
623:
622:
621:
617:
613:
609:
605:
600:
599:
595:
594:
593:
592:
589:
588:
585:
575:
573:
572:
569:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
541:
536:
523:
515:
511:
507:
506:
502:
500:
499:
496:
494:
489:
487:
482:
481:
470:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
441:
436:
432:
428:
427:Google Alerts
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
414:
411:
406:
401:
396:
387:
386:
385:
384:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
360:
359:
358:
357:
354:
349:
344:
339:
325:
323:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
297:
295:
292:
288:
284:
280:
270:
263:
259:
255:
251:
248:
244:
243:
235:
231:
227:
223:
220:
216:
215:
196:
195:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
789:(Contact me)
778:
772:
744:(Contact me)
733:
711:(Contact me)
700:
678:(Contact me)
667:
645:
625:
596:
582:
579:
565:
492:
485:
477:
474:
438:
329:
301:
274:
261:
233:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
493:(What I do)
486:(Question?)
440:World War Z
283:66.65.23.40
148:free images
31:not a forum
514:2007-04-05
801:Mjr162006
722:Ned Scott
689:Ned Scott
648:Ned Scott
522:cite news
435:found out
431:RSS feeds
88:if needed
71:Be polite
27:redirect.
21:talk page
780:BIGNOLE
735:BIGNOLE
702:BIGNOLE
669:BIGNOLE
479:BIGNOLE
471:Director
279:unsigned
254:deletion
226:deletion
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
627:Deckill
612:contrib
584:Deckill
553:contrib
453:contrib
409:veritas
391:Captain
372:contrib
352:veritas
334:Captain
313:contrib
154:WP refs
142:scholar
663:does.
642:Merge?
616:review
557:review
531:|date=
457:review
376:review
317:review
126:Google
394:panda
337:panda
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
805:talk
618:) -
608:talk
604:Erik
559:) -
549:talk
545:Erik
535:help
459:) -
449:talk
445:Erik
429:and
404:vino
378:) -
368:talk
364:Erik
347:vino
319:) -
309:talk
305:Erik
287:talk
262:keep
260:was
234:keep
232:was
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
176:TWL
807:)
630:er
614:•
610:•
587:er
555:•
551:•
526::
524:}}
520:{{
455:•
451:•
399:In
374:•
370:•
342:In
315:•
311:•
289:)
156:)
54:;
803:(
606:(
602:—
547:(
537:)
533:(
516:.
447:(
366:(
307:(
293:.
285:(
264:.
236:.
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
