Knowledge

Talk:One-line joke

Source đź“ť

333:
bit surprised". In each case, there is a "set-up", which expresses a common idea, then a "twist" that takes the statement in a different direction than expected. (I'm sure there are proper terms for these two parts, but I don't recall them off-hand.) Youngman turns an apparent introduction to a chat about his wife into a plea to get rid of her, amazingly with only four words — perhaps the most succinct one-liner ever. Parker sounds like she's going to make a common analogy to express a large quantity, then shifts it into an insult, as RolandStJude says.
258:
miles, or 100,000 km. That's nearly two and a half times around the Earth!"), and turns those expectations on their heads by using the colloquial definition of "laid" to mean "had sex." There were no female students at Yale until 1969, two years after Dorothy Parker died, and so if this joke is impugning the virtue of any girls, it would be students at Vassar College and other schools with female students who were likely to be dates of Yale students.
74: 53: 22: 84: 338:
Not every one-liner has a clearly divided set-up and twist. Marx's description of politics ("the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedies") takes a nominally serious list of characteristics and inserts insults into each of them. But
332:
This is not sourced info, but let me try to point out the difference between a quip and a "one-liner". Notice the two one-liners mentioned above — Youngman's famous "Take my wife… please" and Parker's nearly-as-famous "If all the girls who attended the Yale prom were laid end to end, I wouldn't be a
369:
By the same token, why is Bruce Campbell listed among the examples in this article? He is an action-movie star, and not a comedian or author. Yes, he frequently plays characters who deliver one-liners, but there's just a fundamental difference between spontaneously quipping the kind of things that
318:
information about the concept of "one-liner joke". These should provide one or more definitions, some history, and notable uses. Only within that context would it be appropriate to cite specific examples. Currently, we seem to have it backward — minimal factual info and the danger of making this a
257:
This joke is a pun playing on multiiple meanings of the word "laid." It relies on our expectation that we will hear a factoids about the length or volume of some object ("If all arteries, veins, and capillaries of the human circulatory system were laid end to end, the total length would be 60,000
306:
I've twice removed attempts to broaden the scope of this article to include action/adventure quips like "Yippie-ki-yay, motherfucker" and "I'm a little tied up right now", not only because they don't meet the classic idea of a one-liner joke (which includes the set-up and resolution in a single
353:, in which key words or phrases are meant to be interpreted in more than one way for humorous effect. But one-liners aren't just sentences with a pun; they're self-contained jokes with a specific twist in perspective. At least that's how I see it. I hope this helps. ~ 344:
Contrast these with "I'm a little tied up right now" and "Let off some steam". These quips are not self-contained, as a joke must be. They require a situational set-up that is not part of the quote.
319:
never-ending list. I'm too bogged down in the real world to do proper research for these sources, but I can help vet and format the citations if anyone else wants to take a crack at it. ~
162:
The Henry Youngman joke ("Take my wife. Please.") does not contain wit and is, therefore, not a one-liner. If he was the king of one-liners, maybe there's a better example.--
307:
line), but also because the broadening seems to be more of an excuse to add a bunch of popular movie quotes rather than to discuss and delimit the subject.
227:
The joke impugns the virtue of the girls at Yale. It relies on an understanding of the slang meaning of the word "laid" (to have sexual relations).
487: 140: 130: 444: 265: 492: 482: 460: 243: 196: 174:
To explain a joke means it isn't right for the audience. See, take this perticular person... Please, 'cause I don't want him anymore.
106: 236:
This is a sexist joke. It implies that women attend Yale College on a regular basis, which is not true. They are all men in drag.
393: 177:
As you can clearly tell, the "take" is first used as meaning "for example", then used as meaning "obtain possesion of". Got it?
189:
No. This is not true. It is a one-liner, but it is in two sentences. Which is irrelevant, but pertinent at the same time.
97: 58: 33: 370:
Dorothy Parker did, vs. delivering a scripted line. A subtle difference, maybe, but the two things are not the same.
311: 448: 269: 464: 21: 397: 247: 200: 293: 289: 375: 178: 39: 440: 261: 239: 192: 163: 418: 215:"If all the girls who attended the Yale prom were laid end to end, I wouldn't be a bit surprised." 105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
349:
I imagine the confusion comes from the fact that many one-liners and quips both include forms of
228: 371: 357: 323: 415: 476: 432:
Alcohol isn’t the answer to everything but atleast it makes you forget the question.
89: 339:
it's still a form of twisting an ordinary idea into a joke in a single sentence.
354: 320: 79: 73: 52: 459:
Are they really jokes? Not very funny, any of them; just old used things.
83: 435: 468: 452: 422: 401: 379: 360: 326: 296: 273: 251: 231: 204: 181: 166: 102: 350: 15: 285: 288:
would be added as an external references to this wikipage?
392:
Am I the only one who hasn't heard of a Shmuel breban?
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 221:
I don't really understand that quote.. help me out?
8: 19: 259: 237: 190: 47: 49: 302:Need sources for definition and scope 7: 436:http://onelinersfunny.wordpress.com/ 310:Clearly, what we need here are some 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 284:Would it be approved if the site 82: 72: 51: 20: 135:This article has been rated as 488:Mid-importance Comedy articles 453:18:58, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 1: 402:00:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC) 361:20:03, 25 November 2007 (UTC) 327:19:36, 25 November 2007 (UTC) 292:14:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 167:21:40, 13 December 2005 (UTC) 109:and see a list of open tasks. 297:14:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Comedy 493:WikiProject Comedy articles 483:Start-Class Comedy articles 380:02:44, 9 January 2010 (UTC) 118:Template:WikiProject Comedy 509: 141:project's importance scale 469:11:26, 11 July 2015 (UTC) 423:07:38, 16 July 2011 (UTC) 232:04:05, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 182:18:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 134: 67: 46: 274:14:31, 9 June 2021 (UTC) 252:23:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC) 205:23:35, 1 May 2015 (UTC) 28:This article is rated 419:You can talk to me... 407:Yes. Now go away. 98:WikiProject Comedy 34:content assessment 443:comment added by 286:www.onelinerz.net 276: 264:comment added by 254: 242:comment added by 207: 195:comment added by 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 500: 455: 421: 413: 410: 312:reliable sources 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 508: 507: 503: 502: 501: 499: 498: 497: 473: 472: 445:117.196.229.156 438: 414: 411: 408: 390: 304: 282: 266:107.179.162.108 213: 211:Laid end to end 160: 121:Comedy articles 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 506: 504: 496: 495: 490: 485: 475: 474: 461:49.200.118.109 431: 428: 426: 425: 389: 388:Shmuel Breban? 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 364: 363: 346: 345: 341: 340: 335: 334: 303: 300: 294:134.58.253.131 290:134.58.253.131 281: 278: 225: 224: 223: 222: 212: 209: 187: 186: 185: 184: 175: 159: 156: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 137:Mid-importance 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 62:Mid‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 505: 494: 491: 489: 486: 484: 481: 480: 478: 471: 470: 466: 462: 457: 454: 450: 446: 442: 437: 433: 429: 424: 420: 417: 406: 405: 404: 403: 399: 395: 387: 381: 377: 373: 368: 367: 366: 365: 362: 359: 356: 352: 348: 347: 343: 342: 337: 336: 331: 330: 329: 328: 325: 322: 317: 313: 308: 301: 299: 298: 295: 291: 287: 279: 277: 275: 271: 267: 263: 255: 253: 249: 245: 241: 234: 233: 230: 220: 219: 218: 217: 216: 210: 208: 206: 202: 198: 194: 183: 180: 179:68.48.174.136 176: 173: 172: 171: 170: 169: 168: 165: 157: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 90:Comedy portal 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 458: 439:— Preceding 434: 430: 427: 412:Super Genius 391: 315: 309: 305: 283: 260:— Preceding 256: 244:31.51.13.202 238:— Preceding 235: 229:RolandStJude 226: 214: 197:31.51.13.202 191:— Preceding 188: 161: 158:Take my wife 136: 96: 40:WikiProjects 372:GuySperanza 30:Start-class 477:Categories 409:Evanh2008, 394:66.87.0.66 164:Chrisbotic 416:Who am I? 280:Onelinerz 441:unsigned 314:for the 262:unsigned 240:unsigned 193:unsigned 351:punning 316:factual 139:on the 358:(talk) 355:Jeff Q 324:(talk) 321:Jeff Q 112:Comedy 103:comedy 59:Comedy 36:scale. 465:talk 456:--- 449:talk 398:talk 376:talk 270:talk 248:talk 201:talk 131:Mid 479:: 467:) 451:) 400:) 378:) 272:) 250:) 203:) 463:( 447:( 396:( 374:( 268:( 246:( 199:( 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Comedy
WikiProject icon
icon
Comedy portal
WikiProject Comedy
comedy
the discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
Chrisbotic
21:40, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
68.48.174.136
18:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
unsigned
31.51.13.202
talk
23:35, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
RolandStJude
04:05, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
unsigned
31.51.13.202
talk
23:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
unsigned
107.179.162.108
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑