71:
53:
158:
22:
81:
435:
My addition read as follows: "The cat and mouse game between
Knowledge (XXG) vandals and genuine users reverting changes can be considered a form of one-upmanship: a systematic and conscious practice of "creative intimidation", in which vandals can be one-up upon defacing a page, and moderators can
492:
I think one upping, one upmanship comes from the medieval term that allowed certain factions once a year to mark swans with notches on the beak, those that weren't marked then became property of the king or queen who was reigning at the time. This was actually called Swan upping and I think it's
470:"Potter's unprincipled principles apply to almost any possession, experience or situation, deriving maximum undeserved rewards and discomforting the opposition. The 1960 film School for Scoundrels and the 2006 film School For Scoundrels were satiric portrayals of how to use Potter's ideas."
466:'s work? He's not the progenitor of the word, although he may have popularised it. The article gets quite out of hand, the following two lines have no relation to the concept whatsoever! Weasel words, fluff, you name it - it's there.
204:
I have looked up the reference to the use of "one-upmanship" in the
Canadian Parliament in 1903 and I did not find the word used in the place cited. Therefore I have removed them. The removed sentence and footnote are as follows:
397:
I did Google searches today, and there seem to be more hits for "one-upsmanship" -"one-upmanship" than vice versa. I thought it was a canonical example of the connective "s" in compound words. --
416:
I suppose so, but you must remember that the book was intended as HUMOUR! Its inclusion as a psychology stub is questionable. Will
Wodehouse or Saki or Bierce be defined as social history?
564:
560:
546:
631:
127:
133:
636:
103:
626:
532:
398:
443:
417:
378:
264:
186:
243:
Have reinstated the material removed by above, as the editor in question obviously doesn't know his stuff, nor how to strut it either!
94:
58:
371:
Should there be some mention of "keeping up with the
Joneses" in this article? It seems a quintessential example of one-upsmanship.
542:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
33:
315:
portray the characters, Robert Angier and Alfred Borden, illusionists who engage in a battle of competitive one-upmanship.
607:
482:
478:
172:
563:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
402:
39:
533:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090907172010/http://www.vqronline.org/articles/1993/autumn/lowrey-timelessness/
421:
598:
524:
447:
382:
190:
439:
374:
21:
520:
168:
582:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
570:
436:
be one-up when they use their elevated
Knowledge (XXG) Laissez-Passer status to remove the vandalism."
102:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
523:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
498:
215:
536:
474:
357:
329:
304:
294:
248:
494:
567:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
218:- as can be plainly seen, the term "one-upmanship" nor any related term appears on this page. -
208:"Exactly when the term originated is unknown; several examples are known from the early 1900s.
583:
240:
Have removed the following uncited stuff pending corresponding citations, inline or otherwise:
86:
462:
The term has been used since (at least) 1903. So why does this article read like a review of
590:
289:
549:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
463:
353:
325:
312:
244:
220:
589:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
556:
620:
516:
211:
See
Debates: Official Report, 1903, 6: 6115, Canadian Parliament, House of Commons."
431:
My prime example of
Knowledge (XXG) one-upmanship was removed! I bet you feel one-up
341:
308:
277:
183:
70:
52:
555:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
285:
99:
76:
185:
which was described by David
Winston and developed by David Caton Roberts
268:
612:
502:
493:
feasible that it's be affected by dialect or pronunciation over time.
451:
425:
406:
386:
361:
252:
230:
194:
176:
216:
http://parl.canadiana.ca/view/oop.debates_HOC0903_03/496?r=0&s=3
537:
http://www.vqronline.org/articles/1993/autumn/lowrey-timelessness/
333:
457:
161:
15:
348:
is an egomaniac who compulsively one-ups everyone around her.
298:
in a haughty actor who engages in theatrical one-upmanship.
182:
This idea is a development of the Black Cat
Bastard concept
527:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
214:
Page 6115 of the 1903 debates is readable online here
98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
559:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
458:
It's not about the books, or the man who wrote them
132:This article has not yet received a rating on the
468:
545:This message was posted before February 2018.
8:
515:I have just modified one external link on
47:
19:
276:The character Clem from the comic strip
258:Fictional characters with one-upmanship
49:
632:Unknown-importance psychology articles
112:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Psychology
7:
92:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
519:. Please take a moment to review
156:
79:
69:
51:
20:
637:WikiProject Psychology articles
336:, both deal with one-upmanship.
115:Template:WikiProject Psychology
627:Stub-Class psychology articles
253:11:01, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
1:
613:16:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
503:20:42, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
483:02:22, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
106:and see a list of open tasks.
362:10:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
344:'s character, Penelope, on
195:13:38, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
151:Relation to similar concept
653:
576:(last update: 5 June 2024)
512:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
426:21:15, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
407:21:13, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
387:10:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
200:Canadian reference removed
154:
134:project's importance scale
452:21:42, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
231:19:35, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
177:02:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
167:Section heading added by
131:
64:
46:
508:External links modified
472:
95:WikiProject Psychology
28:This article is rated
267:from the comic strip
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
557:regular verification
547:After February 2018
346:Saturday Night Live
295:Saturday Night Live
118:psychology articles
601:InternetArchiveBot
552:InternetArchiveBot
34:content assessment
577:
442:comment added by
377:comment added by
320:The short films,
148:
147:
144:
143:
140:
139:
87:Psychology portal
644:
611:
602:
575:
574:
553:
454:
389:
226:
225:
179:
160:
159:
120:
119:
116:
113:
110:
89:
84:
83:
82:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
652:
651:
647:
646:
645:
643:
642:
641:
617:
616:
605:
600:
568:
561:have permission
551:
525:this simple FaQ
510:
490:
460:
437:
433:
414:
395:
372:
369:
290:Master Thespian
280:is a one-upper.
271:is a one-upper.
260:
238:
227:
223:
222:
212:
202:
180:
169:Undead Shambles
166:
164:
157:
153:
117:
114:
111:
108:
107:
85:
80:
78:
29:
12:
11:
5:
650:
648:
640:
639:
634:
629:
619:
618:
595:
594:
587:
540:
539:
531:Added archive
509:
506:
489:
486:
464:Stephen Potter
459:
456:
432:
429:
413:
412:Psychology????
410:
399:24.130.210.201
394:
391:
368:
365:
350:
349:
338:
337:
332:, released by
326:Jan Svankmajer
322:The Last Trick
317:
316:
313:Christian Bale
300:
299:
288:'s character,
282:
281:
273:
272:
263:The character
259:
256:
237:
236:Un-cited stuff
234:
221:
210:
201:
198:
155:
152:
149:
146:
145:
142:
141:
138:
137:
130:
124:
123:
121:
104:the discussion
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
649:
638:
635:
633:
630:
628:
625:
624:
622:
615:
614:
609:
604:
603:
592:
588:
585:
581:
580:
579:
572:
566:
562:
558:
554:
548:
543:
538:
534:
530:
529:
528:
526:
522:
518:
517:One-upmanship
513:
507:
505:
504:
500:
496:
487:
485:
484:
480:
476:
471:
467:
465:
455:
453:
449:
445:
444:157.193.6.129
441:
430:
428:
427:
423:
419:
418:80.222.132.98
411:
409:
408:
404:
400:
392:
390:
388:
384:
380:
379:99.190.218.69
376:
366:
364:
363:
359:
355:
347:
343:
340:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
301:
297:
296:
291:
287:
284:
283:
279:
275:
274:
270:
266:
262:
261:
257:
255:
254:
250:
246:
241:
235:
233:
232:
229:
228:
217:
209:
206:
199:
197:
196:
192:
188:
187:86.15.101.235
184:
178:
174:
170:
163:
150:
135:
129:
126:
125:
122:
105:
101:
97:
96:
88:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
599:
596:
571:source check
550:
544:
541:
514:
511:
491:
475:Tomásdearg92
473:
469:
461:
434:
415:
396:
370:
351:
345:
342:Kristen Wiig
330:One Man Band
321:
309:Hugh Jackman
305:The Prestige
303:In the film
293:
278:Rose is Rose
242:
239:
219:
213:
207:
203:
181:
93:
40:WikiProjects
438:—Preceding
373:—Preceding
621:Categories
608:Report bug
488:One upping
393:Up vs. Ups
286:Jon Lovitz
109:Psychology
100:Psychology
59:Psychology
30:Stub-class
591:this tool
584:this tool
354:Technopat
245:AnchorBot
224:Metalello
597:Cheers.—
440:unsigned
375:unsigned
367:Joneses?
521:my edit
495:MattBFC
269:Dilbert
328:, and
265:Topper
36:scale.
334:Pixar
324:, by
292:, on
499:talk
479:talk
448:talk
422:talk
403:talk
383:talk
358:talk
311:and
249:talk
191:talk
173:talk
565:RfC
535:to
162:FYI
128:???
623::
578:.
573:}}
569:{{
501:)
481:)
450:)
424:)
405:)
385:)
360:)
352:--
307:,
251:)
193:)
175:)
165:–
610:)
606:(
593:.
586:.
497:(
477:(
446:(
420:(
401:(
381:(
356:(
247:(
189:(
171:(
136:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
