1696:
commander of the team was a formidable woman called
Mairead Farrell, they knew what the target was, they were pretty certain they knew the date, and they thought they knew exactly how the bombing would be carried out. So far the whole operation had been a staggering success; seldom before had the security forces been in such an enviable position. On the afternoon of Sunday 6 March the MI5 observer is enjoying a quiet cigarette in the main square when he comes face to face with a man in a pin-striped jacket and jeans whose photograph he is certain he has ben looking at all week. It is 2.30p.m. Sean Savage has arrived on the Rock. With a start the watcher turns, walks away and then on the surveillance radio net reports back to the joint operations room the possible sighting of Savage. At almost the same moment other watchers stationed at the border report that two persons answering the description of Farrell and McCann have entered Gibralter on foot and are making their way past the airport terminal towards the town centre. Meanwhile Savage has wandered back across the square to a Renault 5 parked in slot 2 with its to the wall and its boot facing into the area where the band halts at the end of its parade. He unlocks the car and fiddles with something inside for two or three minutes. No watcher is close enough to see what he is doing but the significance is obvious. The waiting is over. The two SAS teams are now ready and awaiting instructions. Each soldier has brought with him from Hereford a 9mm Browning semi-automatic pistol, 9mm ammunition and empty magazines. Suddenly the active service unit is in the square not a stones throw from the operations room. It is 2.50p.m. Farrell and McCann have joined Savage and all three walk along the line of parked cars. They stop and look at the Renault. Not for long but long enough to chill the MI5 watchers. Now there can be no doubt. Identification is positive and the time to strike has arrived. At 2.55 p.m. Colombo (Deputy Commissioner Gibralter Police) agrees to the arrest and, verbally for the moment, passes the civil power to Soldier F and the military. At that moment the three bombers turn away and head out of the square past Soldiers C and D. The soldiers report in with a positive identification and set off in pursuit. Soldier E in the operations room tells them to hold back. Control is once more with the police. At 3.40 p.m. exactly the commissioner of police signs the document handing the power of arrest to the military. He (Detective Constable Charles Huart Special Branch) gets on his motorbike and heads for (Gibralter) town. Suddenly on the corner are all three terrorists, whom he recognizes instantly. At that moment the three separate. Farrell and McCann continue to head north towards the border. Savage turns round and heads back the way he has just come. In the words of Soldier A: "As I was getting close to Farrell and McCann, McCann looked over his left shoulder. He looked over but his body did not turn. He was smiling at the time. I was behind him, approximately ten metres... he looked straight at me. We had eye to eye contact. We looked directly at each other. The smile went off McCann's face ...it is hard to describe but it is almost like McCann had realized who I actually was ...I was just about to shout a warning to stop and at the same time I was drawing my pistol. I went to say "Stop" ...I don't know if it actually came out. I honestly don't know. He looked at me and all of a sudden his right arm, his right elbow, moved, in what I deemed an agressive action, across the front of his body. I thought Mad McCann was definately going for the button. To me the whole worry was the bomb in the assembly area." Soldier A, knowing that McCann is considered to be the IRA's greatest exponent of close quarter combat, now has his browning in his hand and fires one round into McCann's back. He sees Farrell out of the corner of his eye "going for her bag". By now the two soldiers are just three metre away from the bombers. Soldier A assumes Farrell is going for the button. He shoots her in the back and then shoots McCann three more times, one in the back, two in the head. In all, A fires five times. Soldier B is concentrating on Farrell. He draws his own gun as Farrell draws a large shoulder bag across her body. "In my mind she made all the actions to carry out the detonation of a radio-controlled device... I fired one or two shots at Farrell and then switched fire to McCann... in all seven shots." Soldier C fires four rounds to the chest and two the head. Soldier D fires nine rounds. In all, Savage is hit no less than fifteen times. At 4.06 p.m. soldier F hands over control of the military operation on the colony back to the police commissioner. The military operation has been running for just twenty-six minutes. Three of the IRA's most ruthless operatives are dead. By a majority of nine to two the (inquest) verdict was lawful killing.
5054:. Andrews claimed that the British security police would be on trial. Lawyers acting at the Inquest on behalf of the families of the deceased applied to have the hearing held without a jury, fearing that a local jury might not be totally objective. However, their application was refused. Before the Inquest, certificates were issued that certain information should not, in the public interest, be disclosed. This included the identity of the soldiers involved in the operation (referred to only as soldiers A to G) as well as sensitive operational information. 79 witnesses gave evidence. The identity of the soldiers was protected by a tent erected in the patio of the Supreme Court with a thick curtain behind which witnesses gave evidence. The SAS came under intense scrutiny at the Inquest and the question which arose was whether there had been a security blunder on their part when they shot dead the terrorists having assumed that they were armed and about to detonate a bomb. Lawyers for the families argued that the decision to kill the suspects had been made by the Government of the United Kingdom before the incident and the soldiers were ordered to carry out the shootings. Alternatively, they argued, the operation had been planned and implemented in such a way that the killing of the suspects by the soldiers was the inevitable result. Ultimately, the jury returned a verdict of lawful killing by a 9-2 majority.
3902:, your accusations of "subjective removal" and "censorship" are outrageous and deeply offensive. I've spent hundreds of hours building this article up from the bare bones that it used to be, and I'm certainly not "partial" to either side of the debate, as I think the prose shows. It's extensively researched, and I've taken great care to back up controversial statements with solid references; I certainly have not sought to shy away from anything that one party or the other may find uncomfortable. However, not everything can be included—the article is already hovering around the 8,000-word mark, and many thousands more words have been written elsewhere about the events described in this article. The role of an encyclopaedia is to summarise the literature on the subject; that means there comes a point when you have to decide whether something is significant enough for inclusion and what weight to give it. If we didn't do that, this article could easily be three times the size it is, but the reader's understanding of the subject would be no deeper.The background section in particular should be restrained—its purpose in an article like this is to help the reader understand who the main parties were and how they operated,
2771:"Flags should not be used to misrepresent the nationality of a historical figure, event, object, etc. Political boundaries change, often over the span of a biographical article subject's lifetime. Where ambiguity or confusion could result, it is better not to use a flag at all, and where one is genuinely needed, use the historically accurate flag." The flag of Ireland is used in the info box , while I understand that the terrorist organisation (probably get a warning for that) used this flag , it is still the flag of a soveriegn state which should not be used in the context here and I beieve this is covered above in MOS:FLAG . I will leave this here for a day and then remove flag icon if there is no counter MOS issue , if its a
1437:
1416:
1733:
available for an outrageous fee per page, Channel 4 bought a copy and did a full reconstruction of the inquest. This was believed to be the closest thing apart from televising the actual proceedings. I could not find the ECHR report online so created a .pdf of the copy downloaded from their website and anyone interested in the details should read that rather than the sensationalised accounts in paperback form. I've added some photographs of the locations taken recently - they are much as they were then except there were more cars parked in front of the bank then. I used to watch the band assembling and think about the possibility of someone planting a bomb, sadly others did too.
3051:"makes it unclear, ambiguous or controversial". As you say " the whole point is that the IRA aren't non-state, more acting on behalf of an unrecognised state" using a flag of that state . It also uses other flags , maybe one of them would suffice ? As for the usage in this article , how would you describe the use of the tricolour? Inappropriate ? Unnessecary ? Misleading ? Ambiguous? I have read the link , and it is clear that the POV that the tricolour usage by the IRA in articles is correct even with consensus and the links it still a POV. Where can we have a good chat about this ? Flags or Ireland , open the catergory chat and let me in - dont forget to invite others .
2979:, is Ireland an offical legally recognised body ? Yes . Could there be ambiguity when used in cases like this on Wiki ? Yes . The PIRA , as in this case , do use the flag . If you want to qoute history the flag is older than ANY form of the IRA by about thirty years . Many organisations use it . In most cases it would be clear what the flag stands for . In a military history context it should only be used where the state has been involved , not for a terrorist organisation which has been illegal in that state and even attacked the legal army and police force of that state what would the flag icons be used here if they were to be used
679:
658:
3583:"Partial rv" (actually almost entire rv) re my last edit by HJ Mitchell is borderline censorship and should be explained and discussed on talk page. Mentioning only police and Army as opposed to the whole litany of victims -- reservists, politicians, judges, WWII veterans, loyalists, alleged informers, etc -- is a disservice to the article and to the truth. If you rv references to the creation of the PIRA from the 1960s split in the IRA as a whole, then we can maybe remove some extraneous details, but otherwise how else to distinguish between PIRA as compared to OIRA, from which it split?
4017:: Thanks for your work on the background section, and for digging up some broader sources. I hope you don't mind if I incorporate them into the general references section with the other books. It's been a few weeks since I wrote it, but I don't think anything from Urban was verbatim ("pursued its aims" I'm almost certain are my words, not his). He devotes several pages to explaining the origins of the Provisional IRA and I tried to boil it down to a couple of lines for background. I don't have the book to hand right now, but I'll check it later and get you a quote tomorrow.
4694:"Armed forces, police, judiciary and prison service" is four items, seven words. I don't know how many items you send to the laundry at one time, but I certainly would not think of four items as a laundry list. It's a straightforward statement of how the IRA operated – which, if I understand correctly, is the purpose of the paragraph - and I don't see any benefit accruing from lopping off three words (the "and" will need to stay). As I said in the section above, this is your baby, and I feel no great need to oppose you. I can't help wondering though, if there aren't some
1324:
4428:
answered the questions in such a way", they'll be saying "what? wait, you're losing me". Strict chronology is not important for an overview; readability is. Right now, you're the person writing the article; I'm not going to waste time arguing the toss with you. But when you submit this for FA, the question of readability is going to be raised again, and your "I just like having things in chronological order" isn't going to satisfy the reviewer. If you think I'm wrong, by all means ignore me. I'm not going to come back in two months time and say "I told you so."
3911:
other hand, have used ambiguous edit summaries, removed vital facts on the extremely dubious grounds of "synthesis" and "speculation" (on which points you seem not to fully understand the applicable policies) and you have repeatedly reinstated your edits after I have carefully fixed the problems without resorting to a wholesale revert, apparently without reading my edit summaries. I would appreciate it if you would show me the same courtesy I have shown you, and I would ask that you strike your accusation of censorship.
4257:, "It is a case of the first para summarising the lede. The idea is to bring the key points up front to people unfamiliar with the topic, with a longer introduction in the rest of the lede. This is helpful because Knowledge articles are often much longer than other encyclopedia articles - this is one of the more common criticisms of Knowledge, that there's far too much detail and not enough overview." What I am proposing is to give the overview in the first paragraph, and the chronology from the second paragraph on.
4675:
more or less relevant than any other group. Military personnel are obviously relevant because
Operation Flavius was concerned with an attempted bombing of a military parade; police officers I think I added originally to give some background (to avoid the impression that the IRA only attacked soldiers), and now we've got the laundry list. I think the judges were singled out for the sake of the prose rather than because they were more important. I agree that we should probably retain the destruction of businesses.
4716:, I hope you'll reconsider. Perhaps I've not been the easiest person to work with, and maybe I am a little protective, but my aim is to make this the best encyclopaedia article it can be, and I was quite enjoying working with you towards that aim. Your contributions thus far have been extremely valuable, and it's hard to overestimate the value of having people like you to discuss changes with and to challenge things if something is going wrong—this article would be much poorer if I were the only contributor.
875:
489:
854:
468:
3024:. Any arguments about illegality are specious. Are you going to remove the Confederate flag from American Civil War articles? Or the Stars and Stripes from American Revolutionary War articles? Plenty of non-state (although the whole point is that the IRA aren't non-state, more acting on behalf of an unrecognised state) actors have flags, should they all be removed because they aren't "legal"? I've no real preference for both flags versus no flags, but having only one flag is POV.
1150:
1129:
499:
261:
1295:
1340:
437:
768:
1055:
747:
3906:. We don't need a full history of the IRA (or indeed the SAS), much less Irish Republicanism, we have other articles that are far better equipped to inform readers on those subjects; we need enough so that a reader understands how the IRA came to plan a bomb attack in Gibraltar. I welcome—and have welcomed—edits that improve the article, but some of your edits have introduced more problems than they've solved. I've
372:
1045:
956:
190:
1024:
935:
778:
294:
3763:). If there is anything you object to as inaccurate or untrue, then please feel free to rectify. Also, I added some info to the background section re splinter groups since you pointed out that the OIRA ceased activity in the 1970s but the PIRA was not the only republican group active since that time. But if this added info is too tangential or better placed elsewhere then feel free to remove. Yours,
4313:—were believed to be planning a bombing attack on British military personnel in Gibralter. SAS soldiers challenged them in the forecourt of a petrol station, then opened fire, killing them. All were found to be unarmed, and no bomb was discovered, leading to accusations that the British government had conspired to murder them. An inquest in Gibraltar ruled that the SAS had acted lawfully, while the
1380:
1526:
1243:
1505:
4213:
operation was controversial and the questions it raised – the use of lethal force, warnings, possible surrender, alleged conspiracy etc. – and make a brief mention of the
Milltown killings and the corporals killings as well. This is the sort of information the reader will look for if, for instance, the first paragraph appears on the front page of Knowledge some day.
594:
573:
4560:. I'm not sure we need to mention the judiciary specifically, but if we are, that copy-edit was useful. RMS, the rest of your edits introduced various problems. For example, the articles uses "IRA" (not "PIRA") as the abbreviation throughout; as I understand it, the latter was mainly used by the British Army, and "IRA" is used by all the sources and in
1257:
1222:
2291:
concealable transmitter/aerial combination, which he maintains must have been well known to the authorities. He also drew attention to the fact that the strength of a hand held transmitter is severely attenuated when held close to the human body; when transmitting it should be held well clear of the body with the aerial as high as possible.
4564:. Similarly, "Volunteer" is, I believe, a term mainly used by the IRA to describe its activists; even Eckert (who is otherwise apologetic for the IRA in many parts of his book) thinks the term portrays the IRA as "social workers toting assault rifles"—I've tended to avoid the term, in the same way that I've avoided words like "terrorist".
2454:
personal unsubstantiated opinion of someone is not productive in describing events of a historical nature. Indeed his claim is probably based on the flawed view that 'innocent people' were shot on the streets of
Gibraltar by the SAS which we know was not the case, a view supported by the inquest verdict. --
4146:
I am removing the reference to the Good Friday
Agreement. For one thing, the Agreement was in 1998, and the cessation of activity was in 2005, so the two are nor generally linked by commentators, except in so far as they were both part of the Peace Process; and for another, the GFA is not relevant to
2929:
states several reasons against and some reasons for . The
British flag was perfectly ok in the article even as a stand alone flag . What reason was there for me to remove it ? It was acurrate unambiguous and clearly should the state that the combatants belonged to - as you pointed out "It may in some
2494:
Its a pity that your author has chosen to come of with defamatory weasel words, however, there is no shortage of material describing the IRA in less than flattering terms for murdering innocent civilians, as they proposed to do in
Gibraltar, nor for that matter articles describing SAS bravery. Can I
2047:
Tomlinsons credentials as exMI6 are not disputed afaik. A gagging order was also previously issued to try and prevent dissemination of the list alongside all his other legal woes. With these things in mind i'm wondering if the detail
Tomlinson alleges can be included in the article even though it was
4980:
It's ok. You don't need to spend any time justifying anything to me. I am not committed to this article the way you appear to be. You have my view - that it's ridiculous. To call it a lede is ridiculous. My view hasn't changed. Regardless of there having been a "review process". I will drop out now.
4735:
Thanks, but I meant it when I said I think I've contributed enough. I never meant to be a major contributor; I just wanted to share my thoughts on two or three things, and now I've done that. I wish you all the best in your quest for FA status, and I'm sure someone else will come along and help with
4674:
I'm not sure we really need the laundry list of different targets; for example, the targeted plenty of politicians and other establishment figures but they're not mentioned in the article. As far as background is concerned, I don't think police officers, prison officers, and judges are significantly
4427:
It's a question of flow. As I said at the beginning of this discussion, we're talking about what readers will see on the front page of
Knowledge some day. If they're reading, "questions were asked about the killings...some other killings happened in the following weeks...and the inquest and the ECHR
3811:
list of every kind of person that they killed. This is not the IRA article, it's an article on a very specific subject. So, rather than adding resident magistrates to the list, it would be better to summarise it as "members of the police, military, prison system and judiciary, including off-duty and
2402:
Fr
Raymond Murray, author of The SAS in Ireland (1990), has described the SAS as an assassination squad, like the South American death squads, who, acting outside the law, have killed persons when they have had the opportunity of arresting them. He also says they are well known "for shooting wounded
2290:
131. The applicants also submitted a further opinion of Dr Scott, dated 22 October 1993, in which he reiterated his view that it would have been impossible for the three suspects to have detonated a bomb in the target area from the location where they were shot using an ICOM or any other conceivable
1790:
Since they were immediately killed, they had no chance to defend themselves so we don't know what their personal intentions were. Meanwhile, since the British government had infiltrated the PIRA with numerous spys - including bomb experts - we don't know how reliable the evidence was against them.
5005:
I contributed the following which includes some interesting stuff that isn't covered in the article presently (even though the article is extremely long). I reproduce it for those who may see merit in including all or any of the following (all sourced). My edit was reverted in about 5 minutes so no
4372:
I also think it would be no harm to have the paragraph break where it was before (after "seen to cross the border shortly afterwards"). Simply moving the content from the first para into the second has had the effect of making the second para very long and somewhat daunting. The three sentences are
3557:
Works for me. I thought the "considered to be a terrorist organisation" was worth including, because the British approach to Flavius was one counter-terrorism rather than an operation against an opposing military, but i you think it goes without saying, I'll go along with that. As to linking, some
3413:
is against the MoS—external links belong in their own section if we're to have them, not linked to words in the body; "Thus, the court decided there had been a violation of Article 2 in the control of the operation." is not synthesis, it's a statement of fact (and indeed that's a concise version of
3368:
is unnecessary imo; The person might be named (and I'll check), but I don't think the name would add to the reader's understanding, as the event in question is mostly background to the main subject of the article. Also "traveled" versus "travelled" is an ENGVAR thing; Brits use the version with two
3270:
The operation (better known as the "Gibraltar killings") is notable for the fact that three IRA operatives were killed. This should not be sprung on the reader in the middle of the second paragraph of the lead, but the fact and the location should be stated in the first sentence: "Operation Flavius
2726:
I've removed the last paragraph citing from that lunatic rag 'The First Post', honestly you cannot cite from a 'source' that suggests that both 9/11 and 7/7 were conspiracies while not offering any facts for same just uneducated opinion, they did exactly the same over the sniping of Sir Christopher
1846:
There is reason to believe that the 'Gibraltar three' were bad people and that their elimination preserved the lives of many others, in that context I think the People of Gibraltar are due an official apology from the IRA for the attempt - which they have already acknowledged they maed - and that a
1772:
They were lawfully killed, not murdered. That was the verdict of the inquest. You are free to imagine whatever you like, but there is no evidence. There was evidence of explosives and given the past history of the team they were fully committed. You might want to add some extra material describing
1747:
The intention of the PIRA was to blow up the bandsmen, there was evidence they were in possession of semtex, detonators and timing devices. There were experienced and had no regard for human life. The Inquest determined that was their purpose, the independent ECHR review confirmed it, and the IRA
4659:
judges were to be included as targets – my only objection to the previous edit was that it singled out judges for no apparent reason. Also, "mainly in Northern Ireland and England" is misleading. If you wanted to cover all your bases, you could say "mainly in Northern Ireland, sometimes in England
4228:
I went for a three-paragraph lead just because I didn't want to overwhelm readers with what was already quite a long article, but there's scope to make it a bit longer if we think that's necessary. I would prefer to keep it in chronological order if possible, so perhaps a new paragraph between the
4212:
The lead is not too long for the length of the article, and could be expanded into four paragraphs. I think the second sentence of the first paragraph should be the first section of the second, as it begins the chronology of the event. The remainder of the first paragraph should talk about why the
3910:
assumed good faith and given you and your edits the benefit of the doubt; since I've known you were following edits to the article, I've used very clear edit summaries; and I have been friendly in interacting with you because my only interest is the best possible encyclopaedia article. You, on the
3610:
I have no objection to the whole range of IRA activity being included. I also thought that "police or military patrols" was a bit bare. I do think that the list could be ordered a bit better, though; at the moment it looks kind of thrown together. I don't think suspected informers should be there,
2632:
At a press conference held in, the Convent yesterday afternoon British officials, controlling all information, stated that UK forces were supporting the police and that the three people killed were suspected terrorists. People who were in the area of the shooting say that there were at least seven
2472:
I agree, if Knowledge is largely based on biased news reports the whole concept is flawed. However, it is not! We also have authors who have spent time in researching the subject, which can not be just dismissed as "rampant propaganda" and "unsubstantiated opinion" without any supporting evidence.
2123:
the evidence presented at the inquest you need to substantiate that claim. They reviewed the evidence and came to conclusions. It may be you believe the evidence was rubbish, it may be that I think a lot of it was lies and fabrication from both camps, but neither of us are ECHR judges and its the
1910:
The links with Gibraltar and Ireland are good, indeed we are twinned with Ballymena where a number of Gibraltarians were evacuated during WW2, the Irish here are well integrated and liked. Our situation is rather different as the indigenous population is both British, Catholic, self-governing, and
1864:
Who determines what is an "illegal paramilitary organisation"? King George of England believed that George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, and all of the other U.S. Patriots were members of an "illegal paramilitary organisation" and they would have been hung as traitors if King George
2930:
narrow military history circumstances be appropriate to use flags"- from MOSFLAG . It also stated ,"Beware of political pitfalls, and listen to concerns raised by other editors. Some flags are (sometimes or always) political statements and can associate a person with their political significance,
1758:
The were killed before they took any action! They could have aborted the mission, got cold feet and decided not to carry it out or anything - we will never know! What we do know is the SAS killed 3 unarmed people on the bias and ALL of them reached for their pockets even though they were actually
1695:
The (British) intelligence service was now convinced that the bombing would take place on Tuesday 8 March, yet while the Joint Operations Centre was deliberating, there was still no sign that either (Danny) McCann or (Sean) Savage was getting ready to leave Belfast. They knew the third member and
4654:
The original text said it "attempted to achieve its aims through bombing and shooting of businesses and police or military patrols". This was subsequently clarified and extended, but the edit you link to leaves out the destruction of businesses altogether. We also had agreed that prison officers
4536:
Having said all that, I would have no problem with changing "military, police, judicial and prison personnel" to "members of the armed forces, police, judiciary and prison service". But I'll see what Harry thinks. He's the one that has taken the trouble to bring this article up to standard. When
1708:
wrong spelling of Gibraltar, My understanding was that all three were leaving Gibraltar at the time, not moving towards the town center. The reference to 'the main square' is bollocks as the bomb and holding car were parked further south. This sounds like a sensationalised version taken from a
1667:
I think its good to have them seperate, the incident was important as was the attempt to supress an ill informed bit of TV journalism. The solution is to expand the two topics in different ways. One thing that is not mentioned is that Channel 4 did a reconstruction of the inquest. I have that
3529:
I am making some changes to the first few sentences of this section. Firstly, if we say that the IRA was a paramilitary organisation that aimed to get the British out of Northern Ireland though the use of force, it adds nothing to say that they were "considered by the British to be terrorists";
3106:
reads: "At this time, neither the island of Ireland nor Northern Ireland has a universally recognised flag. In those instances, if an organisation uses a flag or banner to represent the island of Ireland or Northern Ireland, use that flag or banner to represent teams, bodies or people under its
3611:
either. While the IRA did undoubtedly kill them, it couldn't really be said to have been part of their strategy i.e. how they "pursued their aims". I also think "to intimidate opponents and drain the British Exchequer" is a bit hyperbolic, and could do with clarification as well as toning down.
2453:
I think you know that looking for reports that people do not do something is a rather weak argument. If you are saying that all news reports are biased then as Knowledge is largely based on such things, the whole concept is flawed. All I am saying is that including rampant propaganda and the
1732:
Theres a lot of overlap between the various entries in Knowledge about this incident. Currently all of them are fairly accurate, based on the report of the ECHR, which included the evidence presented at the inquest. Probably because of the interest at the time, this was not published and was
4519:
vague, given that I have already said that I have no objection to the whole range of IRA activity being included? I want to help Harry bring this article up to FA standard. Your use of that word, and the earlier use of the word "censorship", directed at Harry, might suggest that you are less
4407:
I've no issue with the rewording of the opening paragraph, except that I really would prefer to keep things in chronological order—ie mention Milltown and the corporals in the order that they happened; the ECtHR case didn't conclude until nearly six years after the shootings but is currently
3139:
3148:
2828:
I do understand that aspect Mo Ainm , but the flag represents the state from 1922 , it should not in that time period (1922 - present) be used to represent an organisation that is not or never has been a part of that state . And as above "makes it unclear, ambiguous or controversial".
4495:
Why is the killing of judges so important, that it merits special mention. It's not as though the IRA targetted one judge a week for thirty years. Were judges the target of the planned operation in Gibralter? If not, why is there a specific need to emphasise the killing of judges
1924:
I was in Dublin the day of the Omagh atrocity and shared the shock with the people there. There is nothing to be admired from this sort of activity and those who came to Gibraltar intending to murder and maim innocent people received swift justice. Its history, leave it alone.
4471:
Anyway I don't want to get into any kind of edit war regarding good faith editing, so I wanted to know if you could look again (via edit history) at the rewording I used and let me know if you have any problem with it (and why) so I can TRY to reword it for mutual agreement, if
4951:
drastic. It needs to adequately summarise the article but without going into excess detail. It's on the longer side of acceptable at the moment, and I'm certainly not averse to some pruning for readability if it goes into too much detail, but please bear in mind that this is a
2051:
I have not read on the subject of Flavius so cannot say if the naming of Ramscar is a confirmation of previously alleged information or something new. Either way its some detail that doesn't appear in the article presently so might be worth including without infringing WP:OR.
2727:
Andrew. Also the Guardian cite makes no mention of him being a 'court historian', rather the piece had sympathies with the service. It's only point which wasn't even criticism more a suggestion was that it might have been better to have a raft of historians rather than one.
3542:. I'm also linking the Provisional IRA, because it's the beginning of the article proper, and a long way from the link at the start of the lead. Finally, I thought "bombing and shooting of businesses" sounded very stange, so I am re-ordering the wording in that sentence.
2087:
The ECHR reviewed the technical evidence presented at the Gibraltar inquest, they did not add to it. As the transcript of the inquest is not freely available, I believe they charged 5 quid a page, publication by the ECHR is a reliable source of the nonsense that went on.
4068:
If you're happy with the paragraph as it is now, there's no need for you to check back and see what Urban said, as he's no longer one of the sources. Thank you for moving those sources into the General references section; I should have done it myself but I was too lazy.
2373:
As far as I'm aware, that is not correct. The person who examined the parked car briefly said he reported it as a suspected car bomb; and when asked in court what he meant by tnat, he explained it meant he could not rule out the possibility there was a bomb in the car.
5025:
The Inquest in Gibraltar which followed the shooting to establish the causes of death commenced on 6 September 1988 and lasted until 30 September 1988. The proceedings attracted much interest from the international press who followed the proceedings as well as from the
2954:
As I have stated I am not in favour of flags in infobox, but I will point out that there is no problem with the use of the tricolor since its use by the Irish Republic pre-dates the use by the Free State and its successors, and the tricolor is the flag used by the IRA.
3311:"The British authorities had intelligence that the IRA was planning an attack in Gibraltar possibly as early as August 1987. " Did the authorities have the intelligence as early as August 1987 or was the intelligence that the attack might be as early as August 1987?
1987:
On the radio evidence, radio propagation around the rock is rather strange and the limited tests done by both camps are best described as RUBBISH. I watched the Army people doing theirs. Although I'm not saying Scott lied, he was very economical with the truth.
2140:
114. The applicants called Dr Scott, who held a masters degree and doctorate in engineering and was a licensed radio operator. He had been involved in two IRA trials in England. He had conducted tests with similar receivers along the route taken by the three
1605:. In particular, I am concerned that you state the inquest "found that all three had been shot while laying face down on the ground" I can find no mention of this crucial detail elsewhere on the web; where is your source? Otherwise, it should be removed.
5226:
which I have corrected. If you know of any, please correct. Also, if you hate my bundling of citations pls feel free to revert (I think they are easier on the reader and use them when citations are not repeated). Up to you, unwatching, best regards,
4387:
I've no strong feelings on the break, but it does no harm and the paragraph was a bit big (even after a little trimming before I combined the two). I'll look at the other stuff in more detail sometime in the next few days—I'm on a train at the minute.
4250:
Operation Flavius was a controversial military operation in which three members of the Provisional IRA were shot dead by the SAS in Gibraltar on 6 March 1988. From late 1987, the British authorities were aware that the IRA was planning to detonate a
2794:"If the use of flags in a list, table or infobox makes it unclear, ambiguous or controversial, it is better to remove the flags even if that makes the list, table or infobox inconsistent with others of the same type where no problems have arisen."
1828:
There are few things in this life that we can be totally sure about, in relation to this incident everybody lied in places, however the idea is to present the official record and things that are evidenced rather than wild assumptions lacking any
3020:. Nothing new really brought up here. The tricolor is verifiabily the flag of Irish republicanism and the IRA, and its use pre-dates any adoption by any other Irish state. It did not cease to be the flag of Irish republicanism at any point,
2552:
The Gibraltar Chronicle does not come anywhere remotely near being the second oldest newspaper in the world, there are dozens of still published journals very much older, but even if it was, age alone does not make it a reliable source.
3802:
through the killing, by shooting and bombings..." Multiplying the refs doesn't help there. Indeed, it only adds to the confusion, because they're all very long pages, and I can't see what, specifically, you're citing. I'd still like if
3089:
it is a set "of best practices that are supported by consensus. Editors should attempt to follow guidelines, though they are best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply." Far from being 'obstructive' Domer48 (at
2633:
shots and a young man who saw the bodies of the man and woman close up says that both had their faces disfigured by the shots. The car was towed away and there has been no confirmation of the story that it held 500 pounds of explosives.
4331:
First of all, the three should be named and linked in the first paragraph, followed by the reason they were challenged, and the place they were challenged (thus explaining why the main image is one of a petrol station). Remember the
2536:
is the second oldest newspaper in the world and has a commensurate reputation. Its reporting of the foiled IRA atrocity was factual and lacked the ranting and misinformation of the UK press over the shooting of known IRA murderers.
4960:
to ensure it meets strict criteria. That doesn't mean it's perfect or that it can't be changed, just that a lot of people have had input on the way it is. I'll reply in more detail in the morning as it's getting on for 01:00! Best,
4468:. However, I believe the edit is salutary, and most certainly not tweaking for tweaking's sake. I believe the term "judicial personnel" is quite unclear, almost intentionally vague, whereas "members of the judiciary" is far clearer.
2684:
An MI5 surveillance photo of O'Hanlon in Gibralter in 1988 has been released. Definitely looks like her. Part of Christopher Andrew's new book. Depending on what Andrew's book actually says, it may merit inclusion in the article.
1691:
page. I feel it is too specific and would be better suited here. However, the language appears to be pidgin-esque and requires a good deal of editing to be fit for inclusion. It also seems to lack any sources. (Copyright issues?)
1347:
1236:
1895:
Nobody denies that they were in Gibraltar to detonate a large bomb, so consider them 'casualties of war' like the attack on Sir Peter Terry, who was believed to have been playing golf in Spain when the original shooting occured.
3098:. 'Legal' or 'illegal' doesn't matter here, since we have reliable sources cited in that discussion that support the use of the Tricolour as the flag of Irish republicanism. Additionally, a much more specific guideline actually
1331:
1232:
4587:) for those who want to know exactly what the IRA did during its campaign. I'll gladly concede that my original version wasn't perfect, and I'm entirely open to suggestions, but it's not meant to be a comprehensive list.
153:
3361:, I've reverted your most recent series of edits. some of the changes were useful, but you also introduced a lot of problems. I'll list them in order so we can discuss them if there are any you feel strongly about:
4527:
In the light of the above questions, is "judicial personnel" really that much more unclear than "members of the judiciary"? And if clarity is so important, why have you now replaced "members of the judiciary" with
1983:
I'd agree there should be more information about the inquest, however the only published material is that reproduced in the ECHR review, unless you can get hold of a transcript of the Channel four reconstruction.
5265:
4317:
held that, although there had been no conspiracy, the planning and control of the operation was flawed. The deaths were the first in a chain of violent events in a fourteen-day period; they were followed by the
1389:
336:
2510:
That sounds like some of "rampant propaganda" and "unsubstantiated opinion" without any supporting evidence we mentioned above. Its probably stuff like that which appeared in that colonial outposts newspapers.
2268:
Sir, if, as has been suggested above, you would take more care in reading the wording of the section you keep reverting, you would see that what is being stated is that evidence and statements were disputed
3271:
was a controversial military operation conducted in Gibraltar by the British Special Air Service (SAS) on 6 March 1988, in which three members of the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA) were killed."
5415:
4957:
2617:
Gibraltar is not a 'colonial outpost' any more than Dublin. As regards the Gibraltar Chronicle headline, that sounds a reasonable description. Which part do you think is wrong? Unlike the UK newspapers
2337:
Dr Scott was economical with the truth. The MoD people refuted his evidence, and there was a technical analysis in the magazine 'Wireless World' which calculated that it was possible, as indeed it is in
355:
275:
3675:
I would also have concerns about sourcing. The CAIN page linked to gives a lot of statistics about violence, but does not say that this is the way the IRA "pursued their aims". The other source, Urban's
5425:
1487:
1477:
2705:. The files state she was observed "reconnoitring" in Gibralter, but spotted local intelligence and returned to Ireland. Andrew's views on the operation as a whole should probably be included as well.
5260:
5275:
836:
729:
640:
555:
545:
5280:
5295:
3815:
The info on other parmilitary groups is not needed. The Officials are only there because it confuses readers if you talk about a split without saying what the other half of the split was.
5420:
5066:
in 1995.. The Court ruled by the narrowest of margins (10 to 9) that the killing did not constitute use of force which was "absolutely necessary" and that article 2 (right to life) of the
2407:
Its pretty clear the SAS do not operate in that manner and specifically did not in Gibraltar and the inclusion of that very POV quote would be rather like someone including the opinion of
1453:
1394:
605:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2843:
There was discussion before about the flag issue on another article about the use of the Flag of Ireland and as far as I can remember consensus was to use it, i'll see if I can find it.
5330:
907:
2875:. I could understand national flags used for armies of combatant nations - the British Flag in this article , but using a state flag when the state is not invovled is against MOS:FLAG.
5270:
606:
521:
2411:
about the IRA which is equally unflattering. If there is evidence that the SAS do that sort of thing, lets see news reports of it and not just a prejudiced unsubstantiated opinion.
5410:
1714:
The terrorists had been spotted in Spain and tracked by the Spanish intelligence services, who declined to attend the inquest, but it is believed co-operated fully with the British.
5400:
5405:
5380:
5365:
4520:
concerned with improving the article than with holding all the sins of the IRA up to the light of day. If we were not assuming good faith, that is. Let me just remind you that
1444:
1421:
1204:
1194:
2808:
Personally I agree with the removal of flags from all infobox but it also states in MOSFLAG "It may in some narrow military history circumstances be appropriate to use flags"
5395:
147:
601:
578:
512:
473:
1886:
However, I believe the IRA has been an illegal organisation according to the laws of Ireland for some time. My pal with a degree in history says you are wrong about 1798.
5385:
5325:
1269:
300:
3220:
so I would be against using it if we have reliable sources for the addition of the Flag of Ireland then if we are going to ignore the MOS then that is what we go with.
4373:
not too little for a stand-alone para. Having the break where it was made sense: one para for the build-up, one for the event itself, and one for the legal fall-out.
1996:
1631:
article is notable enough to deserve an article of its own. There is some overlap between the two articles, but that's not a major problem and is required to give the
4635:? I'm also considering removing prison officers from the list, but I don't feel overly strongly if somebody wants to make an argument for their continued inclusion.
4541:
say I don't want to get into any kind of edit war, I stop edit-warring. I'm not going to revert you again; I'll let you and Harry sort out the wording between you.
5039:
5375:
5290:
3017:
1170:
630:
5345:
3143:
Yes, the very symbol of the Provisional IRA is the Phoenix. Although it dates back to the XIX century as republican icon, the Phoenix gained momentum during the
1006:
996:
3416:
Fine, but I simply am often leery of third parties' "versions" of source text, because this indicates some (unavoidable) degree of personal cogitation, but OK.
2628:
British troops evacuated the whole area surrounding the Inces Hall where a car believed to contain a large bomb was being dealt with by bomb disposal experts.
1541:, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
3798:
I think you misread what I said. I didn't say that CAIN was not reliable, I said that I couldn't see anything on the page to back up the assertion that "It
5390:
5315:
5305:
3558:
people believe very passionately that no article should contain two links to the same place, but my general rule is once in the lead and once in the body.
826:
719:
5435:
5350:
3940:
when you apparently reverted almost the entire edit in question. I took umbrage, but I'm sorry for any untoward comments made in the heat of the moment.
1576:
1566:
79:
3132:
1157:
1134:
44:
5360:
5335:
5320:
5285:
4147:
the events of 1988. I'm changing "in abeyance" to "inactive", and moving it back to the start, as it explains the change of tense in the sentence ("
3936:
I apologize for the heated language. Obviously this is a topic that people feel strongly about. The censorship claim was based on your edit summary
1111:
1101:
917:
2568:
Well your description sounds like some "rampant propaganda" and "unsubstantiated opinion" without any supporting evidence which was covered in the
5440:
5340:
4841:
at this article. If they make any reverts, whether explicitly marked as such or not, to this article they may be blocked without further warning.
4610:
I personally think it makes more sense, purely from the point of view of providing background to the events, if judges were not singled out, i.e.
972:
2532:
Use of the phrase 'colonial outposts' sounds like you want to be offensive and does not apply to Gibraltar which long ceased being 'a colony'.
5370:
5051:
1264:
1227:
2429:
Lets see evidence that the SAS do not do that sort of thing, "lets see news reports" that are not just a prejudiced unsubstantiated opinion.--
5300:
4571:—it's there to help the reader understand the history as it relates to the events described in the article; we have links to other articles (
3483:
Thanks for your courtesy. I indicated my feelings or actions above on each of the four points you made. We should be able to move ahead now.
1601:
This article does not give a fair description of the events of March 1988, nor of the political circumstances. There is a better account at
1273:
695:
85:
1436:
1415:
5430:
5310:
5255:
5035:
5031:
4229:
second and first (as they are currently) would be better? By all means try something if you want; it'll be next week before I can do much.
2148:
The evidence is contradictory, but the ECHR did not rule on that, or dispute any of it, even Dr Scott who was economical with the truth. --
1542:
802:
4584:
3751:
I may have misconsolidated something, but I do trust and rely on CAIN implicitly. These links I added to the text should be informative (
5067:
4797:
3680:, is the source that was used for the previous, much shorter sentence. I would like to know exactly what that book says on pages 32-34.
4660:
and to a lesser extent in other parts of Europe", but I think it's easier just to leave it as "both in Northern Ireland and England".
3369:"l"s. The rest I have no strong feelings about. -- I re-added the name of the IRA volunteer shot dead, Kevin McCracken (as per source:
5355:
4509:
2008:
1077:
963:
940:
4340:
a summary of a summary after all – and I think all the information about this incident, including court cases, should come before a
2663:
2370:
The article says "The SAS team was incorrectly informed that the IRA had already placed their bomb and were ready to detonate it."
2662:. E.g. his book "Hard Time: Armagh Gaol 1971-1986" is searing, and well written, but is based around his own reports on the jail.
686:
663:
414:
410:
384:
4790:
by the paramilitaries which was leading to acquittals when there was ample evidence presented in court of the accused's guilt.
1999:, so surely they were at least as capable, if not more so, 9 years later in 1988? Radio detonation was used the same day at the
678:
657:
168:
1533:
1510:
791:
752:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
99:
30:
3151:. I guess this bird is our opportunity to avoid further users complaints about the use of the Tricolour and future edit wars.
2069:(tried including a namebase link describing the original gagging order controversy but it triggers the spam blacklist alert)
135:
5063:
4314:
3033:
2216:
2175:
2107:
1449:
104:
20:
3018:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Terrorism/Archive 3#Use of national flags to represent non-state paramilitary/terrorist groupings
2031:
has edited the list of MI6 he previously released and the MI6 responsibilities for Operation Flavius apppear attributed to:
1974:, the inquest, and the European Court. In fact, it takes up most of the inquest section, which needs more detail in itself.
5185:
Restano, John "Justice so Requiring: The Emergence and Development of a Legal System in Gibraltar"; Calpe Press 2012 pg. 71
5176:
Restano, John "Justice so Requiring: The Emergence and Development of a Legal System in Gibraltar"; Calpe Press 2012 pg. 71
5167:
Restano, John "Justice so Requiring: The Emergence and Development of a Legal System in Gibraltar"; Calpe Press 2012 pg. 71
5158:
Restano, John "Justice so Requiring: The Emergence and Development of a Legal System in Gibraltar"; Calpe Press 2012 pg. 80
5149:
Restano, John "Justice so Requiring: The Emergence and Development of a Legal System in Gibraltar"; Calpe Press 2012 pg. 70
5140:
Restano, John "Justice so Requiring: The Emergence and Development of a Legal System in Gibraltar"; Calpe Press 2012 pg. 70
5131:
Restano, John "Justice so Requiring: The Emergence and Development of a Legal System in Gibraltar"; Calpe Press 2012 pg. 70
5122:
Restano, John "Justice so Requiring: The Emergence and Development of a Legal System in Gibraltar"; Calpe Press 2012 pg. 70
5113:
Restano, John "Justice so Requiring: The Emergence and Development of a Legal System in Gibraltar"; Calpe Press 2012 pg. 70
5104:
Restano, John "Justice so Requiring: The Emergence and Development of a Legal System in Gibraltar"; Calpe Press 2012 pg. 70
5095:
Restano, John "Justice so Requiring: The Emergence and Development of a Legal System in Gibraltar"; Calpe Press 2012 pg. 70
2328:
My understanding was that the ECHR did not accept any 'new' evidence and simply reviewed what was presented at the inquest.
1068:
1029:
881:
859:
74:
4869:
4698:
issues here. However, do what you feel. I think I've contributed enough, and I'm going to unwatch this. Happy editing.
4169:
Thanks. I agree that Good Friday isn't relevant to this article, though I wasn't aware of the more complicated history.
1748:
issued a statement that they were 'on active service' - so lets not introduce any doubt in their purpose and resolve. --
517:
448:
246:
200:
3216:
My feelings on flags is that they shouldn't be in the infobox at all, having said that making up a symbol for entry is
801:
and related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
3318:
270:
65:
3857:. I think I've made all the points you wanted to make, and I've linked to two books that state the facts concisely.
3144:
3047:
Having one flag is not POV .The flag of Ireland being used in a modern i.e. post independence , article is against
3021:
1793:
Matthew Teague talks about "Double Blind," his extraordinary profile of a double agent who helped undermine the IRA
242:
129:
1970:
I think all the various radio evidence needs to be in one place, as at the moment there are competing "claims" in
3026:
2312:
2209:
2168:
2100:
1169:
related topics on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
4838:
4628:
4476:
4319:
3941:
3899:
3764:
3711:
3645:
3584:
3484:
3444:
3418:
3396:
3374:
3358:
436:
260:
223:: All editors on Troubles-related articles are directed to get the advice of neutral parties via means such as
3752:
3286:
Hi Peter, thanks for your suggestion. I've re-worded the first sentence completely; see what you think. Best,
2975:
It is used by the IRA yes ,is the IRA an offical legally recognised body ? No . It is used by the Irish state
1323:
125:
2273:
the ECHR---not that the ECHR disputed said evidence, but rather that the applicants disputed it. It was the
4801:
3193:
3091:
2593:
2569:
2533:
2073:
2012:
1773:
how the PIRA bravely shot the ex-Governor of Gibraltar in the head whilst he was enjoying his retirement. --
1759:
carrying nothing! The implication being that they all made the story up once they got back to the barracks.
1268:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
109:
3135:
3095:
2667:
1602:
5237:
5078:
5011:
4986:
4938:
4920:
4876:
3313:
2936:
an application outside that context can have political (e.g. nationalist or anti-nationalist) implications
234:
3131:
I was thinking of an alternative symbol for the PIRA...I spent some time trying to remember...and I found
293:
245:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
175:
5027:
4970:
4725:
4684:
4644:
4596:
4417:
4397:
4288:
4238:
4178:
4100:
4026:
3964:
3920:
3567:
3507:
3468:
3342:
3295:
3103:
1945:
1643:
504:
454:
280:
3065:
Simple solution really enforce MOSFLAG and remove flags from infobox they add nothing to the article.
2658:
Certainly Raymond Murray's books' are for one audience, and do not claim to be even-handed, breaching
1791:
Do we? See the following references regarding just some of the 'outed' British spys within the PIRA:
371:
4793:
3156:
2363:
2359:
2305:
2240:
4846:
3201:
3183:
3164:
3112:
3056:
2986:
2976:
2943:
2894:
2880:
2872:
2834:
2799:
2780:
2706:
2686:
2004:
1866:
1651:
1636:
1618:
1162:
238:
161:
55:
3756:
2239:"Reviewed"- seems more neutral. ONIH- please use edit summaries to explain why you are reverting.
2190:
The reference is specifically to the radio evidence and that was NOT disputed, it was reviewed. --
1800:
1452:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1076:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
971:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
874:
853:
694:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
520:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
4882:
4833:
For continued disruption to this article, including gaming the 1RR restriction, I have imposed a
4741:
4703:
4665:
4619:
4546:
4433:
4378:
4363:
4349:
4323:
4262:
4218:
4160:
4074:
3862:
3820:
3685:
3619:
3547:
3276:
2732:
2713:
2693:
2383:
2000:
207:, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
70:
4614:
or the alternative I suggested above, but I said I would leave it to you, so I'll say no more.
4310:
2127:
The verdict was disputed by the families of the terrorists for political purposes, thats all. --
1688:
4464:
Hi. Just wanted to let you know I reverted my last edit as I didn't wish to be in violation of
4271:
That's not something I've come across before, but it's quite a good idea. What do you think of
2742:
It clearly says "court historian" so please explain why you say that it dose no mention this.--
2554:
2162:
the European Court". Nobody is saying the ECHR disputed it, but by definition it was disputed
488:
467:
141:
5228:
5074:
5007:
4982:
4934:
4916:
3248:
3230:
3075:
2965:
2916:
2853:
2818:
2750:
2649:
2604:
2596:
their headline was "three dead as police foil Gib IRA attack", so much for factual accuracy!--
2580:
2542:
2519:
2500:
2481:
2459:
2437:
2419:
2028:
1614:
1166:
1149:
1128:
284:
51:
24:
2259:
referenced was provided by the Irish Radio expert so you are 'disputing' that ? Confused. --
5217:
4962:
4717:
4676:
4636:
4588:
4409:
4389:
4280:
4230:
4170:
4092:
4018:
3956:
3912:
3804:
3559:
3530:
there's a bit of a "d'uh!" factor there. Secondly, it's not accurate to say that they split
3499:
3460:
3334:
3287:
1975:
1803:
Because of the infiltration with bomb expert spys into the PIRA, no one will ever know what
1760:
1699:
783:
214:
4888:
Hopefully these are some helpful examples from which to model references formatting sects.
4085:
attempts at governing Northern Ireland both futile and expensive for the British government
3760:
2867:, I cant see any criteria to use it any context here , it seems to make the actions of the
4576:
4561:
4505:
3086:
1870:
1808:
2495:
suggest politely you tone down the language and keep to facts rather than propaganda. --
3498:
Fair enough; I'll probably make a few tweaks tomorrow, but I don't have time right now.
5043:
4901:
4842:
4783:
4521:
4302:
3197:
3179:
3175:
3160:
3108:
3052:
2982:
2939:
2890:
2876:
2830:
2795:
2776:
2659:
2558:
1339:
1060:
2572:. Its probably stuff like that which appeared in that colonial outposts newspapers.--
1944:
It's like having a link to An Phoblact stating Ian Paisley was involved in Greysteel.(
1294:
5249:
5047:
4834:
4737:
4713:
4699:
4695:
4661:
4615:
4542:
4465:
4429:
4374:
4359:
4345:
4306:
4276:
4258:
4253:" does not flow. They should be in separate paragraphs. To quote a now retired admin
4214:
4156:
4070:
4014:
3858:
3816:
3681:
3615:
3543:
3272:
2772:
2728:
2408:
2379:
224:
3370:
1792:
4953:
4861:
4580:
4572:
4501:
3242:
3221:
3217:
3066:
2956:
2907:
2844:
2809:
2744:
2645:
2598:
2574:
2538:
2513:
2496:
2475:
2455:
2431:
2415:
2348:
2260:
2191:
2149:
2128:
2089:
1989:
1956:
1926:
1897:
1848:
1774:
1749:
1737:
1724:
1669:
968:
204:
189:
4491:
Your edits, and your posts here and on my talk page, raise a number of questions:
2695:
2207:
Yes, it was disputed by the applicants which is why it was reviewed by the court.
2158:
Please try reading what you are reverting and saying - "this was further disputed
1796:
2934:. In other cases, a flag may have limited and highly specific official uses, and
2702:
2297:
2062:
767:
746:
1807:
operations were carried out by the British spys - rather than any PIRA members.
213:
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in
3534:
the Official IRA: Officials and Provisionals were the two products of a split
1804:
1050:
1044:
1023:
955:
934:
773:
691:
494:
5046:, the largest political party in Ireland at the time, also sent an observer,
3807:
could tell me what the Urban book said. The other thing is, we don't need an
4896:
3159:, :)) (just a joke), can an agreement be reached?. Your opinions, please.--
1538:
1379:
797:
378:
5241:
5082:
5015:
4990:
4975:
4942:
4924:
4905:
4850:
4805:
4786:
which had been implemented in NI because of the widespread intimidation of
4745:
4730:
4707:
4689:
4669:
4649:
4623:
4601:
4550:
4485:
4437:
4422:
4402:
4382:
4367:
4353:
4293:
4266:
4243:
4222:
4183:
4164:
4105:
4078:
4031:
3969:
3950:
3925:
3866:
3824:
3773:
3753:
http://www.cain.ulst.ac.uk/victims/introduction/smcd07whoarethevictims.html
3720:
3689:
3654:
3623:
3593:
3572:
3551:
3512:
3493:
3473:
3453:
3427:
3405:
3383:
3347:
3327:
3300:
3280:
3255:
3235:
3205:
3187:
3168:
3116:
3080:
3060:
3041:
2990:
2970:
2947:
2921:
2898:
2884:
2858:
2838:
2823:
2803:
2784:
2757:
2736:
2715:
2671:
2653:
2611:
2587:
2562:
2546:
2526:
2504:
2488:
2463:
2444:
2423:
2387:
2367:
2351:
2320:
2263:
2243:
2222:
2194:
2181:
2152:
2131:
2113:
2092:
2076:
2016:
1978:
1959:
1948:
1873:
1851:
1811:
1777:
1763:
1752:
1727:
1702:
1672:
1654:
1645:
1621:
5062:
The Inquest was not the end of the matter. The matter came before the the
3538:
the IRA. I'm putting in a different source for that: Bishop and Mallie's
3436:
3048:
2926:
2889:
Mo ainm ,I did not move the British one because it created no ambiguity .
2864:
2863:
Cheers Mo ainm , I would like a look at that . As I stated it is against
2791:
2768:
2065:
Direct link to his edited version of the previously public MI6 agent list
1719:
The detail can be found in the ECHR review. A link is given on the page.
3707:"The IRA attempted to achieve its aims through bombing and shooting ..."
3614:
I've added half a sentence to distinguish Provisionals from Officials.
3152:
1955:
I'd agree with that. If there was a fourth member it could be anyone. --
1603:
http://www.specialoperations.com/Counterterrorism/Operation_Flavius.html
1525:
1504:
4333:
2639:
A story that gives its sources rather than random ravings about the SAS
1941:
Sorry, the allegations against Siobhan O'Hanlon shouldn't be included.
1073:
3703:"It pursued its aims through the killing, by shooting and bombings..."
3155:
I found a nice svg file... any suggestions about? If it doesn't upset
1617:
article are practically identical, I suggest a merger and redirect. --
2056:
1650:
It would be if the articles were not essentially exactly the same. --
5222:
I cannot find any reason that the bot went from Action1 to Action3
2007:
in 1987. How did it even become an issue at the Gibraltar hearings?
1911:
united before making crass comments you need to be better informed.
1256:
1221:
2043:
POSTINGS: 77 Lagos, 79 Brasilia, 86 Madrid, 89 San Jose, 97 Madrid
1847:
line should be drawn under the matter and that we all move on. --
1797:'Stakeknife' The Story of Britain's Army Spy at the Top of the IRA
1242:
593:
572:
4947:
Hi, leads are something I struggle with, but that's a little bit
4787:
2868:
1537:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on
3757:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/8351344.stm
2296:
Which can be found at this link, already used as a reference -
430:
203:
procedure applies to this article. This article is related to
184:
15:
3333:
The former; I've re-worded to that effect. Thanks very much.
1865:
could have managed to capture them. They may even have been
1883:
1378:
1338:
1322:
4915:
Is the "lede" not ridiculous right now? It's like a book...
2347:
The neutrality of ECHR needs to be carefully maintained. --
2098:
By definition it was disputed, that's why it was reviewed.
5266:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
4408:
mentioned before events which took place just days later.
233:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
4532:"? That word had me scrambling for my Collins dictionary!
4279:? Copy-edits or suggestions for improvement are welcome.
4087:
is a bit over the top; I'll probably change that back to
3102:
the use of the Irish flag for groups other than the RoI.
2403:
and incapacitated persons lying helpless on the ground."
3761:
http://www.cain.ulst.ac.uk/sutton/book/index.html#append
3435:
is in the source; emdashes (—) shouldn't be spaced, per
1995:
In 1979 the IRA had used a radio controlled bomb in the
5416:
Successful requests for military history A-Class review
5223:
4931:
4632:
4611:
4557:
4529:
4272:
4254:
3854:
3432:
3410:
3388:
3365:
2124:
record of that hearing which matters not our opinions.
348:
329:
5426:
Mid-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
5203:
McCann and others v. United Kingdom (1996) 21 EHLRR 97
5194:
McCann and others v. United Kingdom (1996) 21 EHLRR 97
4930:
This is my suggestion for a radically shortened lede:
3391:
I can live with happily; I'll restore it tomorrow. --
2277:
on the part of the applicants that led to the court's
2027:
For those who did not know at this point, exMI6 agent
160:
5261:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
5006:
one really got a chance to read any of the material.
3085:
MOSFLAG is not mandatory, is a guideline, and as any
377:
Facts from this article were featured on Knowledge's
5276:
Low-importance British Overseas Territories articles
1462:
Knowledge:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
1448:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1161:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1072:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
967:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
795:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
690:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
516:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
3644:OK, thanks for your advice and your helpful edits.
1465:
Template:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
1361:
1305:
5281:All WikiProject British Overseas Territories pages
4829:Rms125a@hotmail.com subject to 0RR at this article
615:Knowledge:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
530:Knowledge:WikiProject British Overseas Territories
299:This article appeared on Knowledge's Main Page as
5296:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
3371:http://www.cain.ulst.ac.uk/sutton/chron/1988.html
2622:did not specifically state that there was a bomb:
618:Template:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
533:Template:WikiProject British Overseas Territories
5421:FA-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
2905:...flag icons should not be used in infoboxes...
2059:Tomlinson Blog Saturday, February 24, 2007 entry
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
5331:High-importance GibraltarpediA-related articles
5040:International Association of Democratic Lawyers
2285:4. Further material submitted by the applicants
5271:FA-Class British Overseas Territories articles
4336:. The remainder should be stated briefly – it
3192:Thanks, Murry1975, I left further comments on
3022:particuarly not when adopted by the Free State
2298:http://www.leeds.ac.uk/law/hamlyn/gibralta.htm
5411:European military history task force articles
4860:A better example would be something like the
4512:– where this degree of detail is appropriate.
2063:http://www.savefiles.net/d/h8m5zgonoy3y4.html
174:
8:
5401:British military history task force articles
5050:, a man who would subsequently serve as the
2145:This is the evidence given at the inquest.
283:. Even so, if you can update or improve it,
279:as one of the best articles produced by the
273:; it (or a previous version of it) has been
5406:FA-Class European military history articles
5381:Mid-importance Irish Republicanism articles
5366:FA-Class Ireland articles of Low-importance
4500:? There are no fewer than three articles –
5396:FA-Class British military history articles
4791:
2398:I question the inclusion of the Paragraph
1499:
1445:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
1410:
1358:
1302:
1216:
1123:
1018:
929:
848:
741:
652:
567:
462:
308:
255:
3904:as far as is relevant to the main subject
2119:Vintagekits: If you want to say the ECHR
1179:Knowledge:WikiProject Irish Republicanism
5386:WikiProject Irish Republicanism articles
5326:FA-Class GibraltarpediA-related articles
4089:... making Northern Ireland ungovernable
1262:This article is within the scope of the
1182:Template:WikiProject Irish Republicanism
602:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
513:WikiProject British Overseas Territories
434:
5088:
4298:I was thinking more along the lines of
1501:
1468:Politics of the United Kingdom articles
1412:
1218:
1125:
1020:
931:
850:
743:
654:
569:
464:
1282:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
1272:. To use this banner, please see the
5376:FA-Class Irish Republicanism articles
5291:Mid-importance Crime-related articles
3710:I guess I don't see much difference.
1285:Template:WikiProject Military history
536:British Overseas Territories articles
7:
5346:Mid-importance Human rights articles
5036:National Council for Civil Liberties
5032:International League of Human Rights
4782:Judges were targeted because of the
2903:But you cited MOSFLAG, which states
1531:This article is within the scope of
1442:This article is within the scope of
1348:European military history task force
1155:This article is within the scope of
1066:This article is within the scope of
961:This article is within the scope of
789:This article is within the scope of
684:This article is within the scope of
599:This article is within the scope of
510:This article is within the scope of
196:Warning: active arbitration remedies
5068:European Convention of Human Rights
4358:I've been bold and done the edit.
1687:Someone added the following to the
1332:British military history task force
895:Template:WikiProject GibraltarpediA
23:for discussing improvements to the
5391:FA-Class military history articles
5316:High-importance Gibraltar articles
5306:Low-importance Explosives articles
4510:Provisional IRA campaign 1969-1997
4151:a paramilitary organisation which
2136:The reference is to paragraph 114
2057:http://tomlinsonvmi6.blogspot.com/
981:Knowledge:WikiProject Human rights
14:
5436:Mid-importance Terrorism articles
5351:WikiProject Human rights articles
4631:, Scolaire, what do you think of
4255:in a related discussion from 2009
1801:Sinn Fein British agent shot dead
984:Template:WikiProject Human rights
4567:Above all, though, this is just
4344:mention of the other killings.
1869:like the Irish Patriots of 1798.
1709:popular paperback about the SAS.
1524:
1503:
1435:
1414:
1293:
1255:
1241:
1220:
1148:
1127:
1053:
1043:
1022:
954:
933:
873:
852:
776:
766:
745:
704:Knowledge:WikiProject Explosives
677:
656:
592:
571:
497:
487:
466:
435:
370:
292:
259:
188:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
5361:Low-importance Ireland articles
5336:GibraltarpediA-related articles
5321:All WikiProject Gibraltar pages
5286:FA-Class Crime-related articles
4585:Irish Republican Army (1922–69)
4562:the article on the organisation
1571:This article has been rated as
1551:Knowledge:WikiProject Terrorism
1482:This article has been rated as
1199:This article has been rated as
1158:WikiProject Irish Republicanism
1106:This article has been rated as
1001:This article has been rated as
912:This article has been rated as
898:GibraltarpediA-related articles
831:This article has been rated as
811:Knowledge:WikiProject Gibraltar
724:This article has been rated as
707:Template:WikiProject Explosives
635:This article has been rated as
550:This article has been rated as
5441:WikiProject Terrorism articles
5341:FA-Class Human rights articles
5064:European Court of Human Rights
5058:European Court of Human Rights
4315:European Court of Human Rights
1554:Template:WikiProject Terrorism
1459:Politics of the United Kingdom
1450:Politics of the United Kingdom
1422:Politics of the United Kingdom
814:Template:WikiProject Gibraltar
453:It is of interest to multiple
1:
5371:All WikiProject Ireland pages
4851:12:39, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
4736:the other sections. Regards,
4670:23:12, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
4650:22:12, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
4624:22:43, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
4602:21:00, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
4551:09:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
4486:20:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
4403:21:10, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
4383:09:53, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
4368:09:10, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
4354:22:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
4294:22:06, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
4267:21:04, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
4244:16:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
4223:09:17, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
4184:16:18, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
4165:08:53, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
4106:16:18, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
4083:Yes, it works for me (though
4079:08:53, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
4032:19:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
3970:16:18, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
3951:23:20, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
3926:19:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
3867:14:20, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
3825:11:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
3774:00:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
3721:23:25, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
3690:21:54, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
3655:21:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
3624:14:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
3594:16:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
2938:"Which it woud in this case .
2758:19:33, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
2737:18:12, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
2654:20:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
2612:18:58, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
2588:14:20, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
2547:10:18, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
2527:13:51, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
2505:13:13, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
2489:11:19, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
2464:09:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
2445:00:24, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
2424:22:33, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
2388:18:19, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
2281:. Please see the following:
2077:16:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
1874:02:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
1545:and see a list of open tasks.
1456:and see a list of open tasks.
1173:and see a list of open tasks.
1086:Knowledge:WikiProject Ireland
1080:and see a list of open tasks.
975:and see a list of open tasks.
892:Knowledge:GLAM/GibraltarpediA
805:and see a list of open tasks.
698:and see a list of open tasks.
609:and see a list of open tasks.
524:and see a list of open tasks.
247:contentious topics procedures
42:Put new text under old text.
5301:FA-Class Explosives articles
5242:00:32, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
5083:00:18, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
5016:00:18, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
4991:01:56, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
4976:00:50, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
4943:00:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
4925:00:18, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
4870:The General in His Labyrinth
3573:14:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
3552:13:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
3513:14:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
3494:23:08, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
3474:22:34, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
3454:22:49, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
3428:22:49, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
3406:22:49, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
3384:22:49, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
3348:21:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
3328:22:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
3301:19:18, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
3281:09:19, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
3256:13:11, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
3236:13:08, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
3206:16:10, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
3188:12:13, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
3169:23:21, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
3145:first Civil Marches in Derry
3117:19:36, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
3081:16:29, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
3061:15:17, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
3042:14:04, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
2991:12:07, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
2971:11:46, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
2948:11:34, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
2922:11:11, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
2899:11:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
2885:21:04, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
2859:20:55, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
2839:20:51, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
2824:20:42, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
2804:20:37, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
2785:10:34, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
1979:19:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
1852:09:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
1812:02:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
1778:01:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
1764:00:22, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
1753:23:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
1265:Military history WikiProject
1185:Irish Republicanism articles
1089:Template:WikiProject Ireland
612:Crime and Criminal Biography
579:Crime and Criminal Biography
527:British Overseas Territories
518:British Overseas Territories
474:British Overseas Territories
5431:FA-Class Terrorism articles
5311:FA-Class Gibraltar articles
5256:Knowledge featured articles
3433:"allegedly beaten to death"
2775:issue I will still remove .
2716:10:27, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
2696:10:17, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
1960:18:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
1949:17:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
5457:
4906:20:57, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
4522:Knowledge is not a soapbox
4460:Copied from my talk page:
2722:Examination of MI5 Records
2563:09:57, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
2368:16:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
2264:21:44, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
2244:10:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
2223:10:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
2195:10:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
2182:08:51, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
2153:08:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
2132:08:32, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
2114:08:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
2093:10:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
1577:project's importance scale
1488:project's importance scale
1205:project's importance scale
1112:project's importance scale
1007:project's importance scale
918:project's importance scale
641:project's importance scale
556:project's importance scale
356:Featured article candidate
337:WikiProject A-class review
5356:FA-Class Ireland articles
4972:Penny for your thoughts?
4806:09:28, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
4746:21:32, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
4731:20:50, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
4727:Penny for your thoughts?
4708:00:34, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
4690:19:30, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
4686:Penny for your thoughts?
4646:Penny for your thoughts?
4598:Penny for your thoughts?
4438:00:15, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
4423:19:35, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
4419:Penny for your thoughts?
4399:Penny for your thoughts?
4290:Penny for your thoughts?
4240:Penny for your thoughts?
4180:Penny for your thoughts?
4102:Penny for your thoughts?
4028:Penny for your thoughts?
3966:Penny for your thoughts?
3922:Penny for your thoughts?
3569:Penny for your thoughts?
3509:Penny for your thoughts?
3470:Penny for your thoughts?
3414:what the source says) --
3344:Penny for your thoughts?
3297:Penny for your thoughts?
2352:09:00, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
2321:21:38, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
1728:22:02, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
1703:17:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
1673:19:35, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
1655:10:41, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
1646:10:33, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
1622:09:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
1570:
1519:
1481:
1430:
1386:
1357:
1346:
1330:
1301:
1288:military history articles
1250:
1198:
1143:
1105:
1038:
1000:
949:
911:
868:
830:
761:
723:
672:
634:
587:
549:
482:
461:
421:
311:
307:
249:before editing this page.
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
4958:a lengthy review process
4956:, and it's been through
4856:Citation format examples
4839:user:Rms125a@hotmail.com
4320:Milltown Cemetery attack
3127:Alternative PIRA symbol?
2672:21:15, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
2048:published on his blog?
2017:20:37, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
1627:Personally, I think the
964:WikiProject Human rights
880:This article is part of
301:Today's featured article
243:normal editorial process
3853:I've made a stab at it
3194:Talk:Warrenpoint ambush
3092:Talk:Warrenpoint ambush
3016:Previous discussion at
2594:The Gibraltar Chronicle
2570:The Gibraltar Chronicle
2534:The Gibraltar Chronicle
2036:Michael Charles RAMSCAR
1362:Additional information:
1306:Associated task forces:
5052:Irish Foreign Minister
5001:Some Interesting Stuff
4981:Best of luck with it.
4556:Gents, I've just made
4248:No, my point is that "
2932:sometimes misleadingly
1635:article some context.
1383:
1343:
1327:
687:WikiProject Explosives
621:Crime-related articles
443:This article is rated
239:standards of behaviour
75:avoid personal attacks
5028:Government of Ireland
3094:) has only reflected
1966:Radio evidence/claims
1613:This article and the
1534:WikiProject Terrorism
1382:
1342:
1326:
987:Human rights articles
792:WikiProject Gibraltar
505:United Kingdom portal
215:limited circumstances
100:Neutral point of view
2679:
2211:One Night In Hackney
2170:One Night In Hackney
2102:One Night In Hackney
1668:somewhere on VHS. --
235:purpose of Knowledge
105:No original research
5070:had been violated.
4877:El Señor Presidente
3900:Rms125a@hotmail.com
3540:The Provisional IRA
3359:Rms125a@hotmail.com
2005:Enniskillen bombing
1997:Mountbatten bombing
1867:drawn and quartered
1176:Irish Republicanism
1163:Irish republicanism
1135:Irish Republicanism
1069:WikiProject Ireland
710:Explosives articles
281:Knowledge community
5211:Article milestones
4883:Mario Vargas Llosa
4324:corporals killings
3245:
3178:.Agree with use .
2871:look like that of
2747:
2601:
2577:
2516:
2478:
2434:
2001:Warrenpoint ambush
1557:Terrorism articles
1384:
1344:
1328:
1270:list of open tasks
817:Gibraltar articles
449:content assessment
312:Article milestones
201:contentious topics
197:
86:dispute resolution
47:
4808:
4796:comment added by
3812:retired members."
3243:
3218:original research
2764:Flags in Info Box
2745:
2599:
2575:
2514:
2476:
2432:
2074:Dee Mac Con Uladh
2029:Richard Tomlinson
1972:Death on the Rock
1633:Death on the Rock
1629:Death on the Rock
1615:Death on the Rock
1609:Death on the Rock
1591:
1590:
1587:
1586:
1583:
1582:
1498:
1497:
1494:
1493:
1409:
1408:
1405:
1404:
1401:
1400:
1353:
1352:
1274:full instructions
1215:
1214:
1211:
1210:
1167:Irish nationalism
1122:
1121:
1118:
1117:
1017:
1016:
1013:
1012:
928:
927:
924:
923:
847:
846:
843:
842:
740:
739:
736:
735:
651:
650:
647:
646:
566:
565:
562:
561:
429:
428:
365:
364:
303:on March 6, 2023.
267:Operation Flavius
254:
253:
195:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
25:Operation Flavius
5448:
5234:
5221:
5204:
5201:
5195:
5192:
5186:
5183:
5177:
5174:
5168:
5165:
5159:
5156:
5150:
5147:
5141:
5138:
5132:
5129:
5123:
5120:
5114:
5111:
5105:
5102:
5096:
5093:
4973:
4967:
4954:featured article
4728:
4722:
4687:
4681:
4647:
4641:
4599:
4593:
4483:
4456:Background again
4420:
4414:
4400:
4394:
4291:
4285:
4241:
4235:
4181:
4175:
4103:
4097:
4029:
4023:
3967:
3961:
3948:
3923:
3917:
3800:pursued its aims
3771:
3718:
3652:
3591:
3570:
3564:
3510:
3504:
3491:
3471:
3465:
3451:
3425:
3403:
3381:
3366:this {{who}} tag
3345:
3339:
3325:
3321:
3316:
3298:
3292:
3254:
3233:
3228:
3078:
3073:
3040:
3036:
3029:
2968:
2963:
2919:
2914:
2856:
2851:
2821:
2816:
2756:
2711:
2691:
2610:
2586:
2525:
2487:
2443:
2319:
2315:
2308:
2221:
2212:
2180:
2171:
2112:
2103:
1946:Irish Republican
1641:
1559:
1558:
1555:
1552:
1549:
1528:
1521:
1520:
1515:
1507:
1500:
1470:
1469:
1466:
1463:
1460:
1439:
1432:
1431:
1426:
1418:
1411:
1369:
1359:
1313:
1303:
1297:
1290:
1289:
1286:
1283:
1280:
1279:Military history
1259:
1252:
1251:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1239:
1228:Military history
1224:
1217:
1187:
1186:
1183:
1180:
1177:
1152:
1145:
1144:
1139:
1131:
1124:
1094:
1093:
1092:Ireland articles
1090:
1087:
1084:
1063:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1047:
1040:
1039:
1034:
1026:
1019:
989:
988:
985:
982:
979:
958:
951:
950:
945:
937:
930:
900:
899:
896:
893:
890:
877:
870:
869:
864:
856:
849:
837:importance scale
819:
818:
815:
812:
809:
786:
784:Gibraltar portal
781:
780:
779:
770:
763:
762:
757:
749:
742:
730:importance scale
712:
711:
708:
705:
702:
681:
674:
673:
668:
660:
653:
623:
622:
619:
616:
613:
596:
589:
588:
583:
575:
568:
538:
537:
534:
531:
528:
507:
502:
501:
500:
491:
484:
483:
478:
470:
463:
446:
440:
439:
431:
424:Featured article
422:Current status:
374:
351:
332:
309:
296:
271:featured article
263:
256:
225:outside opinions
192:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
5456:
5455:
5451:
5450:
5449:
5447:
5446:
5445:
5246:
5245:
5232:
5215:
5213:
5208:
5207:
5202:
5198:
5193:
5189:
5184:
5180:
5175:
5171:
5166:
5162:
5157:
5153:
5148:
5144:
5139:
5135:
5130:
5126:
5121:
5117:
5112:
5108:
5103:
5099:
5094:
5090:
5060:
5023:
5003:
4971:
4963:
4913:
4858:
4837:restriction on
4831:
4726:
4718:
4685:
4677:
4645:
4637:
4597:
4589:
4577:Provisional IRA
4515:Why would I be
4506:Provisional IRA
4498:in this article
4480:Quis separabit?
4477:
4458:
4418:
4410:
4398:
4390:
4311:Mairéad Farrell
4289:
4281:
4239:
4231:
4210:
4179:
4171:
4101:
4093:
4027:
4019:
3965:
3957:
3945:Quis separabit?
3942:
3921:
3913:
3768:Quis separabit?
3765:
3715:Quis separabit?
3712:
3678:Big Boys' Rules
3649:Quis separabit?
3646:
3588:Quis separabit?
3585:
3568:
3560:
3527:
3508:
3500:
3488:Quis separabit?
3485:
3469:
3461:
3448:Quis separabit?
3445:
3422:Quis separabit?
3419:
3400:Quis separabit?
3397:
3378:Quis separabit?
3375:
3356:
3343:
3335:
3323:
3319:
3314:
3309:
3296:
3288:
3268:
3251:
3241:
3231:
3222:
3174:Fantastic work
3129:
3076:
3067:
3039:
3034:
3027:
3025:
2966:
2957:
2917:
2908:
2854:
2845:
2819:
2810:
2766:
2753:
2743:
2724:
2707:
2701:Didn't see the
2687:
2682:
2607:
2597:
2583:
2573:
2522:
2512:
2484:
2474:
2440:
2430:
2396:
2318:
2313:
2307:Theoldanarchist
2306:
2304:
2220:
2210:
2208:
2179:
2169:
2167:
2111:
2101:
2099:
2085:
2025:
2023:MI6 involvement
1968:
1939:
1745:
1689:Mairéad Farrell
1685:
1637:
1611:
1599:
1556:
1553:
1550:
1547:
1546:
1513:
1467:
1464:
1461:
1458:
1457:
1424:
1367:
1311:
1287:
1284:
1281:
1278:
1277:
1240:
1230:
1184:
1181:
1178:
1175:
1174:
1137:
1091:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1081:
1059:
1054:
1052:
1032:
986:
983:
980:
977:
976:
943:
914:High-importance
897:
894:
891:
888:
887:
863:High‑importance
862:
833:High-importance
816:
813:
810:
807:
806:
782:
777:
775:
756:High‑importance
755:
709:
706:
703:
700:
699:
666:
620:
617:
614:
611:
610:
581:
535:
532:
529:
526:
525:
503:
498:
496:
476:
447:on Knowledge's
444:
347:
328:
237:, any expected
230:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
5454:
5452:
5444:
5443:
5438:
5433:
5428:
5423:
5418:
5413:
5408:
5403:
5398:
5393:
5388:
5383:
5378:
5373:
5368:
5363:
5358:
5353:
5348:
5343:
5338:
5333:
5328:
5323:
5318:
5313:
5308:
5303:
5298:
5293:
5288:
5283:
5278:
5273:
5268:
5263:
5258:
5248:
5247:
5212:
5209:
5206:
5205:
5196:
5187:
5178:
5169:
5160:
5151:
5142:
5133:
5124:
5115:
5106:
5097:
5087:
5086:
5059:
5056:
5022:
5019:
5002:
4999:
4998:
4997:
4996:
4995:
4994:
4993:
4912:
4911:Lede too long?
4909:
4886:
4885:
4880:
4873:
4857:
4854:
4830:
4827:
4826:
4825:
4824:
4823:
4822:
4821:
4820:
4819:
4818:
4817:
4816:
4815:
4814:
4813:
4812:
4811:
4810:
4809:
4784:Diplock courts
4763:
4762:
4761:
4760:
4759:
4758:
4757:
4756:
4755:
4754:
4753:
4752:
4751:
4750:
4749:
4748:
4605:
4604:
4565:
4534:
4533:
4525:
4513:
4489:
4488:
4473:
4469:
4457:
4454:
4453:
4452:
4451:
4450:
4449:
4448:
4447:
4446:
4445:
4444:
4443:
4442:
4441:
4440:
4405:
4370:
4329:
4328:
4327:
4209:
4206:
4205:
4204:
4203:
4202:
4201:
4200:
4199:
4198:
4197:
4196:
4195:
4194:
4193:
4192:
4191:
4190:
4189:
4188:
4187:
4186:
4127:
4126:
4125:
4124:
4123:
4122:
4121:
4120:
4119:
4118:
4117:
4116:
4115:
4114:
4113:
4112:
4111:
4110:
4109:
4108:
4049:
4048:
4047:
4046:
4045:
4044:
4043:
4042:
4041:
4040:
4039:
4038:
4037:
4036:
4035:
4034:
3997:
3996:
3995:
3994:
3993:
3992:
3991:
3990:
3989:
3988:
3987:
3986:
3985:
3984:
3983:
3982:
3981:
3980:
3979:
3978:
3977:
3976:
3975:
3974:
3973:
3972:
3882:
3881:
3880:
3879:
3878:
3877:
3876:
3875:
3874:
3873:
3872:
3871:
3870:
3869:
3838:
3837:
3836:
3835:
3834:
3833:
3832:
3831:
3830:
3829:
3828:
3827:
3813:
3785:
3784:
3783:
3782:
3781:
3780:
3779:
3778:
3777:
3776:
3740:
3739:
3738:
3737:
3736:
3735:
3734:
3733:
3732:
3731:
3730:
3729:
3728:
3727:
3726:
3725:
3724:
3723:
3709:
3666:
3665:
3664:
3663:
3662:
3661:
3660:
3659:
3658:
3657:
3633:
3632:
3631:
3630:
3629:
3628:
3627:
3626:
3612:
3601:
3600:
3599:
3598:
3597:
3596:
3576:
3575:
3526:
3523:
3522:
3521:
3520:
3519:
3518:
3517:
3516:
3515:
3457:
3456:
3430:
3408:
3386:
3355:
3354:Reverted edits
3352:
3351:
3350:
3308:
3305:
3304:
3303:
3267:
3266:First sentence
3264:
3263:
3262:
3261:
3260:
3259:
3258:
3249:
3211:
3210:
3209:
3208:
3157:another people
3128:
3125:
3124:
3123:
3122:
3121:
3120:
3119:
3104:WP:IRISH FLAGS
3031:
3014:
3013:
3012:
3011:
3010:
3009:
3008:
3007:
3006:
3005:
3004:
3003:
3002:
3001:
3000:
2999:
2998:
2997:
2996:
2995:
2994:
2993:
2765:
2762:
2761:
2760:
2751:
2723:
2720:
2719:
2718:
2681:
2678:
2677:
2676:
2675:
2674:
2641:
2640:
2636:
2635:
2624:
2623:
2605:
2581:
2567:
2550:
2549:
2520:
2508:
2507:
2482:
2471:
2469:
2468:
2467:
2466:
2448:
2447:
2438:
2395:
2392:
2391:
2390:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2342:
2341:
2340:
2339:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2329:
2310:
2301:
2300:
2293:
2292:
2287:
2286:
2257:radio evidence
2253:
2252:
2251:
2250:
2249:
2248:
2247:
2246:
2230:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2226:
2225:
2214:
2200:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2185:
2184:
2173:
2117:
2116:
2105:
2084:
2081:
2080:
2079:
2067:
2066:
2060:
2045:
2044:
2041:
2038:
2024:
2021:
2020:
2019:
1967:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1938:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1882:Currently its
1877:
1876:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1767:
1766:
1744:
1741:
1721:
1720:
1716:
1715:
1711:
1710:
1684:
1683:Further Detail
1681:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1610:
1607:
1598:
1595:
1593:
1589:
1588:
1585:
1584:
1581:
1580:
1573:Mid-importance
1569:
1563:
1562:
1560:
1529:
1517:
1516:
1514:Mid‑importance
1508:
1496:
1495:
1492:
1491:
1484:Mid-importance
1480:
1474:
1473:
1471:
1454:the discussion
1440:
1428:
1427:
1425:Mid‑importance
1419:
1407:
1406:
1403:
1402:
1399:
1398:
1395:A-Class review
1385:
1375:
1374:
1372:
1370:
1364:
1363:
1355:
1354:
1351:
1350:
1345:
1335:
1334:
1329:
1319:
1318:
1316:
1314:
1308:
1307:
1299:
1298:
1291:
1260:
1248:
1247:
1225:
1213:
1212:
1209:
1208:
1201:Mid-importance
1197:
1191:
1190:
1188:
1171:the discussion
1153:
1141:
1140:
1138:Mid‑importance
1132:
1120:
1119:
1116:
1115:
1108:Low-importance
1104:
1098:
1097:
1095:
1078:the discussion
1065:
1064:
1061:Ireland portal
1048:
1036:
1035:
1033:Low‑importance
1027:
1015:
1014:
1011:
1010:
1003:Mid-importance
999:
993:
992:
990:
973:the discussion
959:
947:
946:
944:Mid‑importance
938:
926:
925:
922:
921:
910:
904:
903:
901:
889:GibraltarpediA
883:GibraltarpediA
878:
866:
865:
860:GibraltarpediA
857:
845:
844:
841:
840:
829:
823:
822:
820:
803:the discussion
788:
787:
771:
759:
758:
750:
738:
737:
734:
733:
726:Low-importance
722:
716:
715:
713:
696:the discussion
682:
670:
669:
667:Low‑importance
661:
649:
648:
645:
644:
637:Mid-importance
633:
627:
626:
624:
607:the discussion
597:
585:
584:
582:Mid‑importance
576:
564:
563:
560:
559:
552:Low-importance
548:
542:
541:
539:
522:the discussion
509:
508:
492:
480:
479:
477:Low‑importance
471:
459:
458:
452:
441:
427:
426:
419:
418:
385:On this day...
375:
367:
366:
363:
362:
359:
352:
349:April 26, 2014
344:
343:
340:
333:
330:March 19, 2014
325:
324:
321:
318:
314:
313:
305:
304:
297:
289:
288:
264:
252:
251:
229:
228:
218:
210:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5453:
5442:
5439:
5437:
5434:
5432:
5429:
5427:
5424:
5422:
5419:
5417:
5414:
5412:
5409:
5407:
5404:
5402:
5399:
5397:
5394:
5392:
5389:
5387:
5384:
5382:
5379:
5377:
5374:
5372:
5369:
5367:
5364:
5362:
5359:
5357:
5354:
5352:
5349:
5347:
5344:
5342:
5339:
5337:
5334:
5332:
5329:
5327:
5324:
5322:
5319:
5317:
5314:
5312:
5309:
5307:
5304:
5302:
5299:
5297:
5294:
5292:
5289:
5287:
5284:
5282:
5279:
5277:
5274:
5272:
5269:
5267:
5264:
5262:
5259:
5257:
5254:
5253:
5251:
5244:
5243:
5239:
5235:
5231:
5225:
5219:
5210:
5200:
5197:
5191:
5188:
5182:
5179:
5173:
5170:
5164:
5161:
5155:
5152:
5146:
5143:
5137:
5134:
5128:
5125:
5119:
5116:
5110:
5107:
5101:
5098:
5092:
5089:
5085:
5084:
5080:
5076:
5073:
5069:
5065:
5057:
5055:
5053:
5049:
5048:David Andrews
5045:
5041:
5037:
5033:
5029:
5020:
5018:
5017:
5013:
5009:
5000:
4992:
4988:
4984:
4979:
4978:
4977:
4974:
4968:
4966:
4959:
4955:
4950:
4946:
4945:
4944:
4940:
4936:
4932:
4929:
4928:
4927:
4926:
4922:
4918:
4910:
4908:
4907:
4903:
4899:
4898:
4892:
4889:
4884:
4881:
4879:
4878:
4874:
4872:
4871:
4867:
4866:
4865:
4863:
4855:
4853:
4852:
4848:
4844:
4840:
4836:
4828:
4807:
4803:
4799:
4798:95.149.173.13
4795:
4789:
4785:
4781:
4780:
4779:
4778:
4777:
4776:
4775:
4774:
4773:
4772:
4771:
4770:
4769:
4768:
4767:
4766:
4765:
4764:
4747:
4743:
4739:
4734:
4733:
4732:
4729:
4723:
4721:
4715:
4711:
4710:
4709:
4705:
4701:
4697:
4693:
4692:
4691:
4688:
4682:
4680:
4673:
4672:
4671:
4667:
4663:
4658:
4653:
4652:
4651:
4648:
4642:
4640:
4634:
4630:
4627:
4626:
4625:
4621:
4617:
4613:
4609:
4608:
4607:
4606:
4603:
4600:
4594:
4592:
4586:
4582:
4578:
4574:
4570:
4566:
4563:
4559:
4555:
4554:
4553:
4552:
4548:
4544:
4540:
4531:
4526:
4523:
4518:
4517:intentionally
4514:
4511:
4507:
4503:
4499:
4494:
4493:
4492:
4487:
4484:
4482:
4481:
4474:
4470:
4467:
4463:
4462:
4461:
4455:
4439:
4435:
4431:
4426:
4425:
4424:
4421:
4415:
4413:
4406:
4404:
4401:
4395:
4393:
4386:
4385:
4384:
4380:
4376:
4371:
4369:
4365:
4361:
4357:
4356:
4355:
4351:
4347:
4343:
4339:
4335:
4330:
4325:
4321:
4316:
4312:
4308:
4307:Daniel McCann
4304:
4300:
4299:
4297:
4296:
4295:
4292:
4286:
4284:
4278:
4274:
4270:
4269:
4268:
4264:
4260:
4256:
4252:
4247:
4246:
4245:
4242:
4236:
4234:
4227:
4226:
4225:
4224:
4220:
4216:
4207:
4185:
4182:
4176:
4174:
4168:
4167:
4166:
4162:
4158:
4154:
4150:
4145:
4144:
4143:
4142:
4141:
4140:
4139:
4138:
4137:
4136:
4135:
4134:
4133:
4132:
4131:
4130:
4129:
4128:
4107:
4104:
4098:
4096:
4090:
4086:
4082:
4081:
4080:
4076:
4072:
4067:
4066:
4065:
4064:
4063:
4062:
4061:
4060:
4059:
4058:
4057:
4056:
4055:
4054:
4053:
4052:
4051:
4050:
4033:
4030:
4024:
4022:
4016:
4013:
4012:
4011:
4010:
4009:
4008:
4007:
4006:
4005:
4004:
4003:
4002:
4001:
4000:
3999:
3998:
3971:
3968:
3962:
3960:
3954:
3953:
3952:
3949:
3947:
3946:
3939:
3938:""Partial rv"
3935:
3934:
3933:
3932:
3931:
3930:
3929:
3928:
3927:
3924:
3918:
3916:
3909:
3905:
3901:
3898:
3897:
3896:
3895:
3894:
3893:
3892:
3891:
3890:
3889:
3888:
3887:
3886:
3885:
3884:
3883:
3868:
3864:
3860:
3856:
3852:
3851:
3850:
3849:
3848:
3847:
3846:
3845:
3844:
3843:
3842:
3841:
3840:
3839:
3826:
3822:
3818:
3814:
3810:
3806:
3801:
3797:
3796:
3795:
3794:
3793:
3792:
3791:
3790:
3789:
3788:
3787:
3786:
3775:
3772:
3770:
3769:
3762:
3758:
3754:
3750:
3749:
3748:
3747:
3746:
3745:
3744:
3743:
3742:
3741:
3722:
3719:
3717:
3716:
3708:
3705:was formerly
3704:
3701:
3700:
3699:
3698:
3697:
3696:
3695:
3694:
3693:
3692:
3691:
3687:
3683:
3679:
3674:
3673:
3672:
3671:
3670:
3669:
3668:
3667:
3656:
3653:
3651:
3650:
3643:
3642:
3641:
3640:
3639:
3638:
3637:
3636:
3635:
3634:
3625:
3621:
3617:
3613:
3609:
3608:
3607:
3606:
3605:
3604:
3603:
3602:
3595:
3592:
3590:
3589:
3582:
3581:
3580:
3579:
3578:
3577:
3574:
3571:
3565:
3563:
3556:
3555:
3554:
3553:
3549:
3545:
3541:
3537:
3533:
3524:
3514:
3511:
3505:
3503:
3497:
3496:
3495:
3492:
3490:
3489:
3482:
3481:
3480:
3479:
3478:
3477:
3476:
3475:
3472:
3466:
3464:
3455:
3452:
3450:
3449:
3442:
3441:Fine and Fine
3438:
3434:
3431:
3429:
3426:
3424:
3423:
3417:
3412:
3409:
3407:
3404:
3402:
3401:
3394:
3390:
3387:
3385:
3382:
3380:
3379:
3372:
3367:
3364:
3363:
3362:
3360:
3353:
3349:
3346:
3340:
3338:
3332:
3331:
3330:
3329:
3326:
3322:
3317:
3306:
3302:
3299:
3293:
3291:
3285:
3284:
3283:
3282:
3278:
3274:
3265:
3257:
3253:
3252:
3246:
3239:
3238:
3237:
3234:
3229:
3227:
3226:
3219:
3215:
3214:
3213:
3212:
3207:
3203:
3199:
3195:
3191:
3190:
3189:
3185:
3181:
3177:
3173:
3172:
3171:
3170:
3166:
3162:
3158:
3154:
3150:
3146:
3141:
3140:
3137:
3133:
3126:
3118:
3114:
3110:
3105:
3101:
3097:
3093:
3088:
3084:
3083:
3082:
3079:
3074:
3072:
3071:
3064:
3063:
3062:
3058:
3054:
3050:
3046:
3045:
3044:
3043:
3038:
3037:
3030:
3023:
3019:
2992:
2988:
2984:
2980:
2978:
2974:
2973:
2972:
2969:
2964:
2962:
2961:
2953:
2952:
2951:
2950:
2949:
2945:
2941:
2937:
2933:
2928:
2925:
2924:
2923:
2920:
2915:
2913:
2912:
2906:
2902:
2901:
2900:
2896:
2892:
2888:
2887:
2886:
2882:
2878:
2874:
2870:
2866:
2862:
2861:
2860:
2857:
2852:
2850:
2849:
2842:
2841:
2840:
2836:
2832:
2827:
2826:
2825:
2822:
2817:
2815:
2814:
2807:
2806:
2805:
2801:
2797:
2793:
2789:
2788:
2787:
2786:
2782:
2778:
2774:
2770:
2763:
2759:
2755:
2754:
2748:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2738:
2734:
2730:
2721:
2717:
2714:
2712:
2710:
2704:
2700:
2699:
2698:
2697:
2694:
2692:
2690:
2673:
2669:
2665:
2661:
2657:
2656:
2655:
2651:
2647:
2643:
2642:
2638:
2637:
2634:
2629:
2626:
2625:
2621:
2616:
2615:
2614:
2613:
2609:
2608:
2602:
2595:
2590:
2589:
2585:
2584:
2578:
2571:
2565:
2564:
2560:
2556:
2548:
2544:
2540:
2535:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2524:
2523:
2517:
2506:
2502:
2498:
2493:
2492:
2491:
2490:
2486:
2485:
2479:
2465:
2461:
2457:
2452:
2451:
2450:
2449:
2446:
2442:
2441:
2435:
2428:
2427:
2426:
2425:
2421:
2417:
2412:
2410:
2409:Norman Tebbit
2405:
2404:
2399:
2394:POV statement
2393:
2389:
2385:
2381:
2377:
2376:
2375:
2371:
2369:
2365:
2361:
2353:
2350:
2346:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2336:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2317:
2316:
2309:
2299:
2295:
2294:
2289:
2288:
2284:
2283:
2282:
2280:
2276:
2272:
2266:
2265:
2262:
2258:
2245:
2242:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2231:
2224:
2219:
2218:
2213:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2196:
2193:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2183:
2178:
2177:
2172:
2165:
2161:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2151:
2146:
2143:
2142:
2137:
2134:
2133:
2130:
2125:
2122:
2115:
2110:
2109:
2104:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2091:
2082:
2078:
2075:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2064:
2061:
2058:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2049:
2042:
2039:
2037:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2030:
2022:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2006:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1985:
1981:
1980:
1977:
1973:
1965:
1961:
1958:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1950:
1947:
1942:
1936:
1928:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1899:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1885:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1875:
1872:
1868:
1863:
1862:
1853:
1850:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1813:
1810:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1779:
1776:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1765:
1762:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1751:
1742:
1740:
1739:
1734:
1730:
1729:
1726:
1718:
1717:
1713:
1712:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1690:
1682:
1674:
1671:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1656:
1653:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1644:
1642:
1640:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1620:
1616:
1608:
1606:
1604:
1596:
1594:
1578:
1574:
1568:
1565:
1564:
1561:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1535:
1530:
1527:
1523:
1522:
1518:
1512:
1509:
1506:
1502:
1489:
1485:
1479:
1476:
1475:
1472:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1446:
1441:
1438:
1434:
1433:
1429:
1423:
1420:
1417:
1413:
1396:
1392:
1391:
1387:This article
1381:
1377:
1376:
1373:
1371:
1366:
1365:
1360:
1356:
1349:
1341:
1337:
1336:
1333:
1325:
1321:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1310:
1309:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1266:
1261:
1258:
1254:
1253:
1249:
1238:
1234:
1229:
1226:
1223:
1219:
1206:
1202:
1196:
1193:
1192:
1189:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1159:
1154:
1151:
1147:
1146:
1142:
1136:
1133:
1130:
1126:
1113:
1109:
1103:
1100:
1099:
1096:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1070:
1062:
1051:
1049:
1046:
1042:
1041:
1037:
1031:
1028:
1025:
1021:
1008:
1004:
998:
995:
994:
991:
974:
970:
966:
965:
960:
957:
953:
952:
948:
942:
939:
936:
932:
919:
915:
909:
906:
905:
902:
885:
884:
879:
876:
872:
871:
867:
861:
858:
855:
851:
838:
834:
828:
825:
824:
821:
804:
800:
799:
794:
793:
785:
774:
772:
769:
765:
764:
760:
754:
751:
748:
744:
731:
727:
721:
718:
717:
714:
697:
693:
689:
688:
683:
680:
676:
675:
671:
665:
662:
659:
655:
642:
638:
632:
629:
628:
625:
608:
604:
603:
598:
595:
591:
590:
586:
580:
577:
574:
570:
557:
553:
547:
544:
543:
540:
523:
519:
515:
514:
506:
495:
493:
490:
486:
485:
481:
475:
472:
469:
465:
460:
456:
450:
442:
438:
433:
432:
425:
420:
416:
415:March 6, 2024
412:
411:March 6, 2021
408:
407:March 6, 2018
404:
403:March 6, 2016
400:
399:March 6, 2012
396:
395:March 6, 2009
392:
391:March 6, 2008
388:
386:
380:
376:
373:
369:
368:
360:
358:
357:
353:
350:
346:
345:
341:
339:
338:
334:
331:
327:
326:
322:
319:
316:
315:
310:
306:
302:
298:
295:
291:
290:
286:
282:
278:
277:
272:
268:
265:
262:
258:
257:
250:
248:
244:
240:
236:
231:
226:
222:
219:
216:
212:
211:
208:
206:
202:
194:
191:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
5229:
5214:
5199:
5190:
5181:
5172:
5163:
5154:
5145:
5136:
5127:
5118:
5109:
5100:
5091:
5075:Frenchmalawi
5072:END OF STUFF
5071:
5061:
5024:
5008:Frenchmalawi
5004:
4983:Frenchmalawi
4964:
4948:
4935:Frenchmalawi
4917:Frenchmalawi
4914:
4895:
4893:
4890:
4887:
4875:
4868:
4859:
4832:
4792:— Preceding
4719:
4678:
4656:
4638:
4633:this wording
4612:this version
4590:
4581:Official IRA
4573:the Troubles
4568:
4538:
4535:
4516:
4502:The Troubles
4497:
4490:
4479:
4478:
4459:
4411:
4391:
4341:
4337:
4282:
4249:
4232:
4211:
4172:
4152:
4148:
4094:
4088:
4084:
4020:
3958:
3944:
3943:
3937:
3914:
3907:
3903:
3808:
3799:
3767:
3766:
3714:
3713:
3706:
3702:
3677:
3648:
3647:
3587:
3586:
3561:
3539:
3535:
3531:
3528:
3501:
3487:
3486:
3462:
3458:
3447:
3446:
3440:
3421:
3420:
3415:
3399:
3398:
3392:
3377:
3376:
3357:
3336:
3312:
3310:
3289:
3269:
3247:
3224:
3223:
3142:
3130:
3099:
3087:WP guideline
3069:
3068:
3032:
3028:2 lines of K
3015:
2959:
2958:
2935:
2931:
2910:
2909:
2904:
2847:
2846:
2812:
2811:
2767:
2749:
2725:
2708:
2688:
2683:
2631:
2627:
2619:
2603:
2591:
2579:
2566:
2551:
2518:
2509:
2480:
2470:
2436:
2413:
2406:
2401:
2400:
2397:
2372:
2358:
2311:
2302:
2278:
2274:
2270:
2267:
2256:
2254:
2215:
2174:
2163:
2159:
2147:
2144:
2139:
2138:
2135:
2126:
2120:
2118:
2106:
2086:
2068:
2050:
2046:
2035:
2026:
2009:86.44.214.41
1986:
1982:
1971:
1969:
1943:
1940:
1746:
1743:Keep it real
1735:
1731:
1722:
1698:
1694:
1686:
1638:
1632:
1628:
1612:
1600:
1592:
1572:
1532:
1483:
1443:
1388:
1263:
1200:
1156:
1107:
1067:
1002:
978:Human rights
969:Human rights
962:
941:Human rights
913:
882:
832:
796:
790:
725:
685:
636:
600:
551:
511:
455:WikiProjects
423:
382:
354:
335:
285:please do so
274:
266:
232:
220:
209:
205:the Troubles
198:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
5218:HJ Mitchell
5044:Fianna Fáil
5021:The Inquest
4965:HJÂ Mitchell
4720:HJÂ Mitchell
4679:HJÂ Mitchell
4639:HJÂ Mitchell
4591:HJÂ Mitchell
4412:HJÂ Mitchell
4392:HJÂ Mitchell
4303:Seán Savage
4283:HJÂ Mitchell
4233:HJÂ Mitchell
4173:HJÂ Mitchell
4095:HJÂ Mitchell
4021:HJÂ Mitchell
3959:HJÂ Mitchell
3915:HJÂ Mitchell
3805:HJ Mitchell
3562:HJÂ Mitchell
3502:HJÂ Mitchell
3463:HJÂ Mitchell
3337:HJÂ Mitchell
3290:HJÂ Mitchell
2664:86.40.71.42
2275:disputation
1976:Nick Cooper
1937:Allegations
1761:Vintagekits
1700:GiollaUidir
148:free images
31:not a forum
5250:Categories
4864:pages at:
4569:background
4342:very brief
4301:The three—
4208:Lead again
3809:exhaustive
3525:Background
3149:1969 riots
3107:aegis.".--
2790:Also from
2360:Tim2718281
2241:Astrotrain
2166:the ECHR.
1871:Bcsurvivor
1829:substance.
1809:Bcsurvivor
1805:false flag
1543:discussion
1390:has passed
701:Explosives
692:Explosives
664:Explosives
389:column on
276:identified
221:Neutrality
4843:Thryduulf
4696:ownership
4558:this edit
4472:possible.
3411:this edit
3389:this edit
3240:Agree! --
3180:Murry1975
3096:consensus
3053:Murry1975
2983:Murry1975
2940:Murry1975
2891:Murry1975
2877:Murry1975
2831:Murry1975
2796:Murry1975
2777:Murry1975
2620:the story
2338:practice.
2141:suspects.
2040:DOB: 1948
1548:Terrorism
1539:terrorism
1511:Terrorism
808:Gibraltar
798:Gibraltar
753:Gibraltar
379:Main Page
241:, or any
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
5038:and the
4891:Cheers,
4794:unsigned
4738:Scolaire
4714:Scolaire
4700:Scolaire
4662:Scolaire
4616:Scolaire
4543:Scolaire
4430:Scolaire
4375:Scolaire
4360:Scolaire
4346:Scolaire
4322:and the
4277:Scolaire
4259:Scolaire
4215:Scolaire
4157:Scolaire
4071:Scolaire
4015:Scolaire
3955:Thanks.
3859:Scolaire
3817:Scolaire
3682:Scolaire
3616:Scolaire
3544:Scolaire
3459:Thanks,
3437:MOS:DASH
3324:Chequers
3273:Scolaire
3250:'fenian'
3049:MOS:FLAG
2927:MOS:FLAG
2865:MOS:FLAG
2792:MOS:FLAG
2769:MOS:FLAG
2752:'fenian'
2729:Twobells
2680:O'Hanlon
2606:'fenian'
2582:'fenian'
2521:'fenian'
2483:'fenian'
2439:'fenian'
2380:Twobells
2378:updated.
2121:disputed
2003:and the
1652:Coroebus
1619:Coroebus
1237:European
445:FA-class
361:Promoted
342:Approved
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
5233:Georgia
4579:, even
4530:jurists
4475:Yours,
4334:Five Ws
4251:bomb...
4155:...")
3244:Domer48
3225:Mo ainm
3070:Mo ainm
2977:Ireland
2960:Mo ainm
2911:Mo ainm
2873:Ireland
2848:Mo ainm
2813:Mo ainm
2746:Domer48
2703:article
2660:WP:NPOV
2646:Gibnews
2600:Domer48
2576:Domer48
2539:Gibnews
2515:Domer48
2497:Gibnews
2477:Domer48
2456:Gibnews
2433:Domer48
2416:Gibnews
2349:Gibnews
2261:Gibnews
2192:Gibnews
2150:Gibnews
2129:Gibnews
2090:Gibnews
1990:Gibnews
1957:Gibnews
1927:Gibnews
1898:Gibnews
1849:Gibnews
1775:Gibnews
1750:Gibnews
1738:Gibnews
1725:Gibnews
1670:Gibnews
1575:on the
1486:on the
1233:British
1203:on the
1110:on the
1083:Ireland
1074:Ireland
1030:Ireland
1005:on the
916:on the
835:on the
728:on the
639:on the
554:on the
381:in the
320:Process
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
5034:, the
5030:, the
4835:WP:0RR
4788:jurors
4309:, and
3908:always
3536:within
3198:Darius
3176:Darius
3161:Darius
3109:Darius
3100:allows
2314:Comhrá
2279:review
1884:the UN
451:scale.
413:, and
323:Result
126:Google
5230:Sandy
5224:here,
4862:WP:FA
4153:aimed
3439:. --
3320:Spiel
3307:Query
3232:~Talk
3077:~Talk
2967:~Talk
2918:~Talk
2855:~Talk
2820:~Talk
269:is a
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
5238:Talk
5079:talk
5012:talk
4987:talk
4939:talk
4933:....
4921:talk
4902:talk
4897:Cirt
4847:talk
4802:talk
4742:talk
4704:talk
4666:talk
4620:talk
4583:and
4547:talk
4508:and
4434:talk
4379:talk
4364:talk
4350:talk
4273:this
4263:talk
4219:talk
4161:talk
4075:talk
3863:talk
3855:here
3821:talk
3686:talk
3620:talk
3548:talk
3532:from
3393:DONE
3315:Ϣere
3277:talk
3202:talk
3184:talk
3165:talk
3153:Here
3147:and
3136:this
3113:talk
3057:talk
2987:talk
2944:talk
2895:talk
2881:talk
2869:PIRA
2835:talk
2800:talk
2781:talk
2733:talk
2668:talk
2650:talk
2630:...
2559:talk
2555:Wmck
2543:talk
2501:talk
2460:talk
2420:talk
2384:talk
2364:talk
2255:The
2083:ECHR
2013:talk
1165:and
908:High
827:High
317:Date
199:The
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
4949:too
4712:Hi
4657:and
4629:RMS
4466:1RR
3373:).
3196:.--
3138:and
3035:303
2773:POV
2709:Stu
2689:Stu
2592:In
2303:---
2217:303
2176:303
2108:303
1639:Stu
1597:top
1567:Mid
1478:Mid
1393:an
1195:Mid
1102:Low
997:Mid
720:Low
631:Mid
546:Low
176:TWL
5252::
5240:)
5081:)
5042:.
5014:)
4989:)
4969:|
4941:)
4923:)
4904:)
4894:—
4849:)
4804:)
4744:)
4724:|
4706:)
4683:|
4668:)
4643:|
4622:)
4595:|
4575:,
4549:)
4504:,
4436:)
4416:|
4396:|
4381:)
4366:)
4352:)
4338:is
4305:,
4287:|
4275:,
4265:)
4237:|
4221:)
4177:|
4163:)
4149:is
4099:|
4091:.
4077:)
4025:|
3963:|
3919:|
3865:)
3823:)
3759:,
3755:,
3688:)
3622:)
3566:|
3550:)
3506:|
3467:|
3443:.
3395:.
3341:|
3294:|
3279:)
3204:)
3186:)
3167:)
3134:,
3115:)
3059:)
2989:)
2981:]?
2946:)
2897:)
2883:)
2837:)
2802:)
2783:)
2735:)
2670:)
2652:)
2644:--
2561:)
2545:)
2537:--
2511:--
2503:)
2473:--
2462:)
2422:)
2414:--
2386:)
2366:)
2271:at
2164:at
2160:at
2088:--
2015:)
1988:--
1951:)
1925:--
1896:--
1799:,
1795:,
1736:--
1723:--
1368:/
1312:/
1235:/
1231::
409:,
405:,
401:,
397:,
393:,
156:)
54:;
5236:(
5220::
5216:@
5077:(
5010:(
4985:(
4937:(
4919:(
4900:(
4845:(
4800:(
4740:(
4702:(
4664:(
4618:(
4545:(
4539:I
4528:"
4524:.
4432:(
4377:(
4362:(
4348:(
4326:.
4261:(
4217:(
4159:(
4073:(
3861:(
3819:(
3684:(
3618:(
3546:(
3275:(
3200:(
3182:(
3163:(
3111:(
3055:(
2985:(
2942:(
2893:(
2879:(
2833:(
2798:(
2779:(
2731:(
2666:(
2648:(
2557:(
2541:(
2499:(
2458:(
2418:(
2382:(
2362:(
2011:(
1579:.
1490:.
1397:.
1276:.
1207:.
1114:.
1009:.
920:.
886:.
839:.
732:.
643:.
558:.
457:.
417:.
387:"
383:"
287:.
227:.
217:)
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.