Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:February 2010 Australian cyberattacks

Source đź“ť

756:
internet if Australian law is to be taken seriously. This has even been tested through requesting websites with merely illegal information, rather then illegal videos or pictures be added to the block list. Given sedition (advocating a change in government) and anonymous political comments are illegal to varying degrees in Australia, huge portions of the internet may end up blocked. Additionally, citing the source that says the Parliament website was only offline for 50 minutes gives an impression of a failed attack, while later in the article, it says there were varying estimates. I personally checked the Parliament website a full day after the attack started and it was still down. I believe they cycled their attacks. I'm not completely sure though. Maybe individual sites were down intermittently over a long period of time?--
188: 234: 295: 91: 274: 392: 531: 510: 619: 1021: 997: 985: 973: 105: 64: 541: 1475: 1455: 1432: 1404: 1378: 1355: 1316: 1295: 1276: 1260: 1224: 1181: 1015: 1009: 1003: 33: 115: 1073: 212: 84: 991: 979: 253: 1531:: Several sources used refereed to it as "Operation Titstorm" in the body and their titles. However, several did say "attacks" in their titles. I would be happy to err on the side of caution and rename the article as you suggest. Ca I do that now or will that throw off the transclusion of the review and GA bot? 1636:
The GA criteria are strict about images, and give you two choices. 1) Edit the image page and change the "fair use rationale" to one that focuses on the fact that the article discusses the flyer and its historic significance. (Remove the logo-related language about helping the reader recognize the
907:
There is a redirect on Project Freeweb, Operation Titstorm was part of that activity. The Redirection is straying from the purpose of the article. Its not cool to use Knowledge (XXG) or any other article to promote groups however much we might agree with them (even though governments and companies
755:
I just read this article and it didn't seem to be that accurate or informative. For example, it lists what the proposed censor will block but doesn't refer to statements by government spokespeople where they have said it will "block illegal content" which naturally includes nearly half of the
1267:
The Time magazine article reported "their second attack against the filter, which they called "Operation: Titstorm" — a reference to the sexual content that the filter will be blocking." - which is different that independent third parties giving the entire incident that
793:
due to adverse reaction to the DDoS attacks. That is mistaken. Titstorm was the first phase, FreeWebs was "planned," for wont of a better word, at the same time Titstorm was, with every intention of laying out multiple phases of human rights and civil rights advocacy.
1651:
I feel like an idiot. I actually found 3 sources discussing it and one of them is already in the article I think. I will type something up, change it to "critical commentary"n instead of identification, and move it into the appropriate section.
410: 936:
You say "censorship" I say lack of coverage and you failing to do it yourself. Project Freeweb might meet the criteria for its own article. There has been little news coverage so that will need to be addressed if you wish to split it
1701:
As noted above, either improve the fair use rationale for the flyer or remove it from the article. Other that these items, we are done. I have rechecked the disamb links and the external links, and they still check out. Thanks,
1078: 1581:
Good idea. I did not know about Slayo but found a source discussing his bond instead of conviction. I also added a paragraph discussing the current status (or lath there of) of the plan. Is this sufficient?
873:
We shouldn't stray too far from the main subject (this protest/attack) but the other stuff was in the related overage and seemed worthy of notice. There is an Anonymous article for in-depth info of other
1585:
Unfortunately, I cannot find any clarification on what was already illegal except for child porn. Should we mention that child porn is illegal in the Background section or is acceptable to assume?
908:
do it all the friggin time). However, in this case its directly relevant to Project Freeweb, that is the purpose of the article, The redirect to an arbitarily restrictive subject is censorship.
1681:"that would require internet service providers to block Australian users from accessing illegal and what the government deemed as "unwanted" content." - make clear it applies only to Australians. 1821: 982:
Mostly clear, but with possible improvements as pointed below. B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: Not too enamored with the mass of links for See also
1083: 1326:
Please state whether the government continued with its filter program. The article implies that it did continue, but there should be explicit, sourced statements as to what happened.
1018:
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: Overall: Pass or Fail:
1970: 1761:
source given above and moving the article per prior discussions. Congratulations. This is a very interesting article, and I am sorry that GA1 was not a professional experience.
1323:
Background should summarize prior Australian laws regarding pornography. Was it the case that pornography was illegal prior to the initiative that would mandate the new filters?
688: 630: 1930: 479: 202: 345: 1111: 1985: 1950: 1935: 441: 335: 1853: 1849: 1835: 1637:
subject of the article.) Your claim will be stronger if the article actually discusses the existence of use of such flyers. OR 2) delete the image from the article.
1101: 597: 1955: 1925: 1233:? Perhaps the article should be moved to "February 2010 Australian Cyberattacks" What reliable sources gave it the name, or was it named by the anonymous hackers? 1192:"This was dubbed "Project Freeweb" to differentiate it from the cyber attacks that were criticised by other protest groups." - avoid passive voice. Who named it? 808:
It was not "changed" if you read the article and the sources. What you call a "better word" was actually discussed in sources. So go read the sources or go away.
428: 311: 455: 424: 1822:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100212164311/http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-technology/australia-cyber-attacks-could-last-months-hackers-20100211-nuzc.html
1218: 178: 1965: 587: 197: 74: 1945: 830:
It would be nice to also mention that "Anonymous" managed to successfully fight neo-Nazis online for additional background in to the collective's history.
466: 1920: 1347:
says that Steve Slayo was tried for organizing this attack. The subsequent criminal investigation, prosecution and sentencing is relevant to the article.
168: 1825: 1975: 563: 302: 279: 1538:
The bot is really confused about this article already. (That is why I moved this review from GA to GA2). We can move it when we pass the review.
1940: 1608: 1960: 648: 1805: 1618:, and so on. If it comes down to removing the image or GA then it would not hurt my feelings to drop the image. I would just prefer not to. 1155: 1915: 1599:: I originally was not planning on uploading any image but this specific image was used in multiple sources to identify the subject. See: 554: 515: 417: 90: 1980: 1426: 1106: 636: 144: 131: 69: 1831:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1289: 994:
A. References to sources: B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: C. No original research: Is it broad in its coverage?
1689:" Estimates of the number of attacking systems involved have ranged from hundreds to thousands." - counting computers, not people. 924: 771:
Feel free to grab it yourself in the future. Added "illegal" back in and "at one time" since that 50 mins got tons of coverage.
435: 404: 44: 546: 1680:"that would require internet service providers to block illegal and what the government deemed as "unwanted" content."-: --> 83: 888:
I can certainly agree with that. After all, Anonymous' efforts to smack down neo-Nazis is already well covered elsewhere.
1896: 562:-related topics on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 1198: 1596: 1041: 726: 707: 1826:
http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-technology/australia-cyber-attacks-could-last-months-hackers-20100211-nuzc.html
1604: 1129: 1246: 1600: 1570: 1852:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1398: 1125: 50: 1887: 1813: 1480:
This article represents significant work by its author. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns.
1441:
is a bit weak. This is not a logo, and showing the flyer will not help the reader recognize the cyberattack.
850: 761: 912: 920: 187: 1615: 1871:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1859: 618: 310:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1812:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1901: 1784: 1770: 1744: 1730: 1711: 1661: 1646: 1627: 1591:: I intentionally tried to not refer to it as "operation" in the body but one slipped through. Fixed: 1547: 1489: 1332: 1148: 1052: 1035: 963: 960: 946: 928: 897: 883: 868: 854: 839: 817: 803: 780: 765: 294: 273: 1766: 1707: 1642: 1543: 1485: 1144: 1048: 893: 864: 835: 799: 640: 233: 1418: 1254: 1206: 1611: 846: 757: 140: 1856:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1230: 1159: 967: 243: 1872: 1780: 1740: 1726: 1657: 1623: 1031: 942: 879: 813: 776: 1368: 1202: 448: 120: 1879: 1449: 1214: 1210: 1762: 1703: 1638: 1539: 1481: 1140: 1044: 916: 889: 860: 831: 795: 1838:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 391: 17: 1878:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1845: 785:
There are other inaccurate depictions in the article. Ziff Davis claims thatthe title
1909: 1775:
Thanks! Enjoy the Wikicup. I really appreciated your input (especially with the FUR).
1696:"The attack also resulted in criticism of the Australia's terrorism provisions"-: --> 1676:
The article is much better with the recent additions. Please consider these changes:
1566: 1735:
I believe the the FUR, placement, and commentary is now sorted. Any touch-up needed?
1776: 1736: 1722: 1693:"In July 2010, Conroy delayed implementing the plan pending a 12-month review into" 1653: 1619: 1027: 938: 875: 809: 772: 307: 1688:"Estimates of perpetrators involved have ranged from hundreds to thousands."-: --> 1438: 859:
Operation Titstorm was launched by the collective called "Anonymous." Obviously.
1692:"In July 2010, Conroy delayed the plan by ordering a 12-month review into"-: --> 559: 104: 63: 540: 530: 509: 1844:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 536: 211: 110: 136: 1132:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 1589:"Does referring to the incident as an "operation" constitute POV-pushing?" 1697:"The attack also resulted in criticism of the Australia's terrorism laws" 1383:
Does referring to the incident as an "operation" constitute POV-pushing?
470: 473:
to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
224: 1685:"The proposed filter also includes gambling sites" - not yet set up. 1026:
Review was from a malicious account. A review would be appreciated.
1012:
No edit wars, etc: Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
1529:
February 2010 Australian Cyberattacks" vs. "Operation Titstorm"
26: 1605:
Fairfax (the largest media company operating in New Zealand)
1448:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
232: 210: 186: 1816:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1425:
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
1809: 1720: 1592: 1583: 1574: 1523: 1515: 719: 700: 681: 380: 375: 370: 365: 135:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of 558:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 480:
Category:Internet culture articles needing attention
306:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1848:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1439:
http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Operation_titstorm.jpg
1273:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 442:Category:Internet culture articles needing images 1006:Fair representation without bias: Is it stable? 1684:"The filter also includes gambling sites"-: --> 1834:This message was posted before February 2018. 1000:A. Major aspects: B. Focused: Is it neutral? 646:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 143:. If you would like to participate, visit the 8: 1971:GA-Class Low-importance Pornography articles 1333:"Meet the Oz teen behind Operation Titstorm" 1167:No disamb. links or invalid external links. 411:View all requested internet culture articles 320:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Internet culture 1931:Mid-importance Australian politics articles 970:for criteria Is it reasonably well written? 467:Category:Internet self-classification codes 1804:I have just modified one external link on 1061: 660: 613: 504: 399:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 353: 268: 58: 1986:Engineering and technology good articles 1951:Mid-importance Internet culture articles 1936:WikiProject Australian politics articles 988:Is it factually accurate and verifiable? 631:Engineering and technology good articles 1609:Brisbane's daily paper The Courier Mail 1092: 1064: 845:How does that relate to this article?-- 572:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Pornography 506: 270: 60: 1956:WikiProject Internet culture articles 1926:GA-Class Australian politics articles 1806:February 2010 Australian cyberattacks 625:February 2010 Australian cyberattacks 323:Template:WikiProject Internet culture 153:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Australia 127:February 2010 Australian cyberattacks 7: 552:This article is within the scope of 300:This article is within the scope of 32: 30: 1966:Low-importance Pornography articles 1281:Is Fairfax Media a reliable source? 1040:I have started at second review at 357:WikiProject Internet culture To-do: 49:It is of interest to the following 1946:GA-Class Internet culture articles 1757:FUR is well done. Consider adding 1375:Fair representation without bias: 990: 978: 219:Need help improving this article? 25: 1921:Mid-importance Australia articles 1808:. Please take a moment to review 1331:Oates, John (November 25, 2010). 639:. If you can improve it further, 1976:WikiProject Pornography articles 1563:Fairfax Media a reliable source? 1473: 1453: 1430: 1402: 1376: 1353: 1314: 1293: 1274: 1258: 1222: 1179: 1019: 1013: 1007: 1001: 995: 989: 983: 977: 971: 617: 575:Template:WikiProject Pornography 539: 529: 508: 390: 293: 272: 251: 113: 103: 89: 82: 62: 31: 1573:anyways so made the adjustment. 592:This article has been rated as 340:This article has been rated as 198:WikiProject Australian politics 173:This article has been rated as 1941:WikiProject Australia articles 1902:03:07, 29 September 2017 (UTC) 627:has been listed as one of the 547:Erotica and pornography portal 247:can be contacted via email to 156:Template:WikiProject Australia 1: 1981:Knowledge (XXG) good articles 1961:GA-Class Pornography articles 947:21:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC) 929:21:48, 20 February 2010 (UTC) 884:14:34, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 869:17:44, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 855:01:57, 16 February 2010 (UTC) 840:16:10, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 781:04:14, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 766:02:05, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 566:and see a list of open tasks. 314:and see a list of open tasks. 259:for non-editorial assistance. 225:National Library of Australia 195:This article is supported by 1579:Is it broad in its coverage? 1474: 1454: 1431: 1403: 1377: 1354: 1315: 1294: 1275: 1259: 1223: 1180: 1020: 1014: 1008: 1002: 996: 984: 972: 303:WikiProject Internet culture 1916:GA-Class Australia articles 1597:File:Operation titstorm.jpg 1188:"web based companies"-: --> 1042:Talk:Operation Titstorm/GA2 898:20:34, 29 August 2011 (UTC) 818:06:29, 30 August 2011 (UTC) 804:20:32, 29 August 2011 (UTC) 751:Some incorrect information? 244:Wikimedia Australia chapter 2002: 1865:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1801:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1165: 1130:Talk:Operation Titstorm/GA 598:project's importance scale 346:project's importance scale 179:project's importance scale 1785:03:47, 3 March 2011 (UTC) 1771:09:34, 2 March 2011 (UTC) 1745:07:42, 2 March 2011 (UTC) 1731:04:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC) 1712:04:14, 2 March 2011 (UTC) 1662:04:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC) 1647:03:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC) 1628:23:13, 1 March 2011 (UTC) 1612:a UK technology news site 1571:The Sydney Morning Herald 1548:03:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC) 1490:12:58, 1 March 2011 (UTC) 1422:to illustrate the topic? 1149:12:27, 1 March 2011 (UTC) 1053:12:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC) 1036:10:37, 1 March 2011 (UTC) 964:03:38, 1 March 2011 (UTC) 740: 663: 659: 591: 524: 352: 339: 326:Internet culture articles 288: 252: 240: 218: 194: 172: 98: 57: 141:Australia-related topics 1797:External links modified 1559:: See the comment above 1437:Fair use rationale for 1173:reasonably well written 555:WikiProject Pornography 129:is within the scope of 18:Talk:Operation Titstorm 1229:Are we complying with 454:All stubs are located 237: 215: 191: 39:This article is rated 1557:Time magazine article 1308:broad in its coverage 1255:References to sources 1189:"web-based companies" 689:Articles for deletion 637:good article criteria 423:Pick an article from 236: 214: 190: 132:WikiProject Australia 43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 1846:regular verification 1616:Australian tech site 1290:No original research 727:Good article nominee 708:Good article nominee 578:Pornography articles 1836:After February 2018 1569:. But it should be 1427:fair use rationales 1890:InternetArchiveBot 1841:InternetArchiveBot 1313:A. Major aspects: 1242:factually accurate 1178:A. Prose quality: 826:Can we haz mention 791:Operation FreeWebs 787:Operation Titstorm 664:Article milestones 238: 216: 192: 159:Australia articles 45:content assessment 1866: 1450:suitable captions 1120: 1119: 976:A. Prose quality: 932: 915:comment added by 748: 747: 736: 735: 655: 612: 611: 608: 607: 604: 603: 503: 502: 499: 498: 495: 494: 491: 490: 469:(!?); Try to get 267: 266: 263: 262: 16:(Redirected from 1993: 1900: 1891: 1864: 1863: 1842: 1719:All great calls. 1565:: For sure. See 1477: 1476: 1457: 1456: 1434: 1433: 1406: 1405: 1380: 1379: 1357: 1356: 1346: 1344: 1343: 1318: 1317: 1297: 1296: 1278: 1277: 1262: 1261: 1226: 1225: 1183: 1182: 1074:Copyvio detector 1062: 1023: 1022: 1017: 1016: 1011: 1010: 1005: 1004: 999: 998: 993: 992: 987: 986: 981: 980: 975: 974: 966:GA review – see 931: 909: 741:Current status: 722: 703: 684: 661: 644: 621: 614: 580: 579: 576: 573: 570: 549: 544: 543: 533: 526: 525: 520: 512: 505: 405:Article requests 394: 387: 386: 354: 328: 327: 324: 321: 318: 317:Internet culture 308:internet culture 297: 290: 289: 284: 280:Internet culture 276: 269: 258: 257:wikimedia.org.au 256: 255: 254: 161: 160: 157: 154: 151: 123: 121:Australia portal 118: 117: 116: 107: 100: 99: 94: 93: 92: 87: 86: 85: 80: 77: 66: 59: 42: 36: 35: 34: 27: 21: 2001: 2000: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1906: 1905: 1894: 1889: 1857: 1850:have permission 1840: 1814:this simple FaQ 1799: 1674: 1672:March 2 Reading 1341: 1339: 1330: 1201:compliance for 1124:This review is 1116: 1088: 1060: 955: 910: 828: 789:was changed to 753: 718: 699: 680: 577: 574: 571: 568: 567: 545: 538: 518: 487: 385: 325: 322: 319: 316: 315: 282: 250: 248: 221:Ask a Librarian 158: 155: 152: 149: 148: 119: 114: 112: 88: 81: 78: 72: 40: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1999: 1997: 1989: 1988: 1983: 1978: 1973: 1968: 1963: 1958: 1953: 1948: 1943: 1938: 1933: 1928: 1923: 1918: 1908: 1907: 1884: 1883: 1876: 1829: 1828: 1820:Added archive 1798: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1733: 1699: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1673: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1631: 1630: 1594: 1586: 1576: 1560: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1533: 1532: 1525: 1517: 1502: 1501: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1472:Pass or Fail: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1442: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1327: 1324: 1321: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1282: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1265: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1211:words to watch 1195: 1194: 1193: 1190: 1186: 1153: 1135: 1134: 1118: 1117: 1115: 1114: 1109: 1104: 1098: 1095: 1094: 1090: 1089: 1087: 1086: 1084:External links 1081: 1076: 1070: 1067: 1066: 1059: 1056: 954: 951: 950: 949: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 857: 827: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 783: 752: 749: 746: 745: 738: 737: 734: 733: 730: 723: 715: 714: 711: 704: 696: 695: 692: 685: 682:August 7, 2010 677: 676: 673: 670: 666: 665: 657: 656: 622: 610: 609: 606: 605: 602: 601: 594:Low-importance 590: 584: 583: 581: 564:the discussion 551: 550: 534: 522: 521: 519:Low‑importance 513: 501: 500: 497: 496: 493: 492: 489: 488: 486: 485: 484: 483: 474: 458: 444: 431: 413: 398: 396: 395: 384: 383: 378: 373: 368: 362: 359: 358: 350: 349: 342:Mid-importance 338: 332: 331: 329: 312:the discussion 298: 286: 285: 283:Mid‑importance 277: 265: 264: 261: 260: 239: 229: 228: 217: 207: 206: 203:Mid-importance 193: 183: 182: 175:Mid-importance 171: 165: 164: 162: 125: 124: 108: 96: 95: 79:Mid‑importance 67: 55: 54: 48: 37: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1998: 1987: 1984: 1982: 1979: 1977: 1974: 1972: 1969: 1967: 1964: 1962: 1959: 1957: 1954: 1952: 1949: 1947: 1944: 1942: 1939: 1937: 1934: 1932: 1929: 1927: 1924: 1922: 1919: 1917: 1914: 1913: 1911: 1904: 1903: 1898: 1893: 1892: 1881: 1877: 1874: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1861: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1837: 1832: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1802: 1796: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1721: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1671: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1595: 1593: 1590: 1587: 1584: 1580: 1577: 1575: 1572: 1568: 1567:Fairfax Media 1564: 1561: 1558: 1555: 1554: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1524: 1521: 1520:Who named it? 1518: 1516: 1513: 1510: 1507: 1504: 1503: 1500:Modifications 1499: 1498: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1478: 1471: 1470: 1468: 1465: 1459: 1458: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1440: 1436: 1435: 1428: 1424: 1423: 1421: 1420: 1414: 1408: 1407: 1400: 1396: 1395: 1393: 1389: 1382: 1381: 1374: 1373: 1371: 1370: 1365: 1359: 1358: 1351: 1338: 1334: 1329:This source: 1328: 1325: 1322: 1320: 1319: 1312: 1311: 1309: 1305: 1299: 1298: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1280: 1279: 1272: 1266: 1264: 1263: 1256: 1252: 1251: 1249: 1248: 1243: 1239: 1232: 1228: 1227: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1191: 1187: 1185: 1184: 1177: 1176: 1174: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1164: 1163: 1161: 1158:review – see 1157: 1151: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1139: 1133: 1131: 1127: 1122: 1121: 1113: 1110: 1108: 1105: 1103: 1100: 1099: 1097: 1096: 1091: 1085: 1082: 1080: 1077: 1075: 1072: 1071: 1069: 1068: 1063: 1057: 1055: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1043: 1038: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1024: 969: 965: 962: 959: 952: 948: 944: 940: 935: 934: 933: 930: 926: 922: 918: 914: 899: 895: 891: 887: 886: 885: 881: 877: 872: 871: 870: 866: 862: 858: 856: 852: 848: 847:Senor Freebie 844: 843: 842: 841: 837: 833: 825: 819: 815: 811: 807: 806: 805: 801: 797: 792: 788: 784: 782: 778: 774: 770: 769: 768: 767: 763: 759: 758:Senor Freebie 750: 744: 739: 731: 729: 728: 724: 721: 720:March 2, 2011 717: 716: 712: 710: 709: 705: 702: 701:March 1, 2011 698: 697: 694:Speedily kept 693: 691: 690: 686: 683: 679: 678: 674: 671: 668: 667: 662: 658: 653: 651: 650: 642: 638: 634: 633: 632: 626: 623: 620: 616: 615: 599: 595: 589: 586: 585: 582: 565: 561: 557: 556: 548: 542: 537: 535: 532: 528: 527: 523: 517: 514: 511: 507: 482: 481: 476: 475: 472: 468: 465: 463: 459: 457: 453: 451: 450: 445: 443: 440: 438: 437: 432: 430: 426: 422: 420: 419: 414: 412: 409: 407: 406: 401: 400: 397: 393: 389: 388: 382: 379: 377: 374: 372: 369: 367: 364: 363: 361: 360: 356: 355: 351: 347: 343: 337: 334: 333: 330: 313: 309: 305: 304: 299: 296: 292: 291: 287: 281: 278: 275: 271: 246: 245: 235: 231: 230: 226: 222: 213: 209: 208: 204: 201:(assessed as 200: 199: 189: 185: 184: 180: 176: 170: 167: 166: 163: 146: 142: 138: 134: 133: 128: 122: 111: 109: 106: 102: 101: 97: 76: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 29: 28: 19: 1888: 1885: 1860:source check 1839: 1833: 1830: 1803: 1800: 1759:The Register 1758: 1700: 1675: 1588: 1578: 1562: 1556: 1528: 1519: 1511: 1508: 1505: 1466: 1416: 1391: 1367: 1352:B. Focused: 1340:. Retrieved 1337:The Register 1336: 1307: 1245: 1241: 1172: 1166: 1162:for criteria 1154: 1152: 1137: 1136: 1123: 1112:Instructions 1039: 1025: 957: 956: 906: 861:Fredric Rice 832:Fredric Rice 829: 790: 786: 754: 743:Good article 742: 725: 706: 687: 647: 645: 641:please do so 629: 628: 624: 593: 553: 477: 461: 460: 447: 446: 434: 433: 416: 415: 403: 402: 341: 301: 241: 220: 196: 174: 145:project page 130: 126: 51:WikiProjects 1126:transcluded 961:Ankit Maity 911:—Preceding 569:Pornography 560:pornography 516:Pornography 1910:Categories 1897:Report bug 1763:Racepacket 1704:Racepacket 1639:Racepacket 1540:Racepacket 1482:Racepacket 1342:2011-03-01 1247:verifiable 1141:Racepacket 1079:Authorship 1065:GA toolbox 1045:Racepacket 917:Tantaluman 890:Damotclese 796:Damotclese 713:Not listed 635:under the 1880:this tool 1873:this tool 1522:: Fixed? 1399:edit wars 1138:Reviewer: 1102:Templates 1093:Reviewing 1058:GA Review 958:Reviewer: 953:GA Review 478:See also 150:Australia 137:Australia 70:Australia 1886:Cheers.— 1514:: Fixed 1417:contain 1415:Does it 1231:WP:TITLE 1160:WP:WIAGA 1107:Criteria 968:WP:WIAGA 925:contribs 913:unsigned 649:reassess 75:Politics 41:GA-class 1810:my edit 1777:Cptnono 1737:Cptnono 1723:Cptnono 1654:Cptnono 1620:Cptnono 1467:Overall 1401:, etc: 1369:neutral 1215:fiction 1028:Cptnono 939:Cptnono 876:Cptnono 810:Cptnono 773:Cptnono 672:Process 596:on the 471:YouTube 371:history 344:on the 223:at the 177:on the 1419:images 1392:stable 1390:Is it 1366:Is it 1306:Is it 1240:Is it 1217:, and 1207:layout 1171:Is it 874:stuff. 732:Listed 675:Result 418:Expand 47:scale. 1601:Wired 1512:based 1268:name. 1219:lists 1128:from 462:Other 449:Stubs 436:Photo 381:purge 376:watch 1781:talk 1767:talk 1741:talk 1727:talk 1708:talk 1658:talk 1643:talk 1624:talk 1544:talk 1486:talk 1244:and 1203:lead 1145:talk 1049:talk 1032:talk 943:talk 937:off. 921:talk 894:talk 880:talk 865:talk 851:talk 836:talk 814:talk 800:talk 777:talk 762:talk 669:Date 456:here 429:here 425:here 366:edit 249:help 242:The 139:and 1854:RfC 1824:to 1506:Web 1397:No 1288:C. 1253:A. 1199:MoS 1197:B. 588:Low 427:or 336:Mid 169:Mid 1912:: 1867:. 1862:}} 1858:{{ 1783:) 1769:) 1743:) 1729:) 1710:) 1660:) 1645:) 1626:) 1614:, 1607:, 1603:, 1546:) 1488:) 1469:: 1452:: 1429:: 1394:? 1372:? 1335:. 1310:? 1292:: 1257:: 1250:? 1221:: 1213:, 1209:, 1205:, 1175:? 1156:GA 1147:) 1051:) 1034:) 945:) 927:) 923:• 896:) 882:) 867:) 853:) 838:) 816:) 802:) 779:) 764:) 652:it 643:. 205:). 73:: 1899:) 1895:( 1882:. 1875:. 1779:( 1765:( 1739:( 1725:( 1706:( 1656:( 1641:( 1622:( 1542:( 1527:" 1509:- 1484:( 1345:. 1143:( 1047:( 1030:( 941:( 919:( 892:( 878:( 863:( 849:( 834:( 812:( 798:( 775:( 760:( 654:. 600:. 464:: 452:: 439:: 421:: 408:: 348:. 227:. 181:. 147:. 53:: 20:)

Index

Talk:Operation Titstorm
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Australia
Politics
WikiProject icon
Australia portal
WikiProject Australia
Australia
Australia-related topics
project page
Mid
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Australian politics
Mid-importance
Note icon
National Library of Australia
Note icon
Wikimedia Australia chapter
WikiProject icon
Internet culture
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Internet culture
internet culture
the discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
edit

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑