Knowledge

Talk:Orthogonal matrix

Source 📝

122: 112: 91: 21: 201: 60: 321:
I disagree. In my current courses, Continuum Mechanics and Fluid Mechanics at the University of Minnesota the term orthonormal is used quite often and found in our textbook and in a few research papers. In particular "Introduction to the Mechanics of a Continuous Medium" by Lawrence E. Malvern. It
422:
i would assume the line "An orthogonal matrix is a special orthogonal matrix if its determinant is +1" at the start is ment to be "An orthonormal matrix is a special orthogonal matrix if its determinant is +1" as having the sentance that "A is a special case of A" isnt really saying anything, so im
1705:
I disagree. It's not about prescribing, it's about following definitions: "adjective word" should never mean anything other than "word that is adjective" (there are exceptions like dictatorships calling themselves "Democratic People's Republic", but in those cases some entity decides its own name,
1339:
This article makes two factually inaccurate statements in the opening sentences: (i) that orthogonal matrices must be real, and (ii) that the extension of the property of orthogonality to complex matrices is unitarity. Both are incorrect: orthogonality is the requirement that a matrix satisfy
977:
Paul's Online Math Notes' (from Lamar University) pages on linear algebra have been taken off the Web. They have been gone at least since January 2013 and are not there today (May 26, 2013). The link to these notes should probably be removed from this article (and other articles if needed).
1600:, but it's not used.' To say it's never used would be hyperbole, but the point remains that it's not the common name. It may be frustrating that the same word ("orthogonal") in slightly different contexts can mean different things, but that's just the way it is. 1614:
You can't just redefine "orthogonal", no matter how common it is to misuse this term. It does not make sense for "orthogonal matrix" to mean anything other than "a matrix that is orthogonal". This is similar to redefining
1058: 1412:). An extensive clean up seems to be required to make apparent how much of the content of this article actually applies in general to orthogonal matrices, and how much is results special to the real-orthogonal case. 341:
The term "orthonormal" is completely standard in the phrase "orthonormal basis". And, confusingly, the columns of an "orthogonal matrix" do comprise an orthonormal basis. Despite this overlap, the phrase "orthonormal
1403:
While orthogonal matrices with non-real elements are less commonly occurring in mathematics and the sciences than real orthogonal matrices, they do occur, and there is a literature which studies their properties (eg
878:
Isn't the introduction somewhat ambiguous? It says "In linear algebra, an orthogonal matrix is a square matrix with real entries whose columns and rows are orthogonal unit vectors (i.e., orthonormal vectors)." If
788: 370:. It might be tempting to suppose a matrix with orthogonal (not orthonormal) columns would be called an orthogonal matrix, but such matrices have no special interest and no special name; they only satisfy 1419: 1102: 326:
I've even had one assignment requesting I find orthonormal eigen vectors. The manner in which it is mentioned in my courses implies it is standard in the field of Aerospace Engineering. --
178: 438:
The sentence "An orthogonal matrix is a special orthogonal matrix if its determinant is +1" makes perfectly sense to me, but perhaps it's easy to misread it, so I reformulated it. --
594: 1758:
shows a fundamental misunderstanding of what Knowledge is supposed to do. Knowledge summarizes information that appears in reliable sources; including information is a matter of
1644:
you can define the word "orthogonal" to have two different meanings simultaneously; it is an extremely common thing to do with a word, both inside and outside of mathematics. --
517: 1562:– This page describes orthonormal matrices, which a special case of orthogonal matrices, but are not the same. Orthonormal means orthogonal ("ortho") and normalized ("normal"). 1483:. Orthonormal is a special case of orthogonal where the vectors are both orthogonal ("ortho") and normalized ("normal"). The current article is incorrect to equate these terms. 633: 396:
Since you misinterpret the content of the MathWorld site, which I can see, I'm inclined to suspect you make the same mistake with the Malvern text, which I cannot see. --
1374: 829: 920: 852: 1531: 1394: 897: 1152:
However I've always been a bit confused about this. Surely the definition in terms of matrices is only true when the basis is itself orthonormal? In components
1450:
Note this only occurs on this math article, I read many other articles with LaTeX embedded with no problems. So I doubt it's a browser issue (I use FireFox).
1814: 168: 942:= a^T M b, a matrix Q preserves the inner product if and only if Q^T M Q = M. Unless M is (a multiple of) the identity, such matrices are not orthogonal. 987: 1456:
Curiously the problem is not visible when I open the "Edit" tab where the formatting works just fine, so I'm not sure how to offer an edit / fix.
1687:. I totally agree that orthonormal matrix could have been a better name, for reasons Aaronfranke mentioned, but this is not given any weight by 1566:
is a well-defined term, orthogonal does not mean normalized, orthogonal only means orthogonal. After the move, orthogonal can get its own page.
1441:
The LaTeX formatting is not working correctly throughout this article. For example see the superscipted T indices near the top of the article:
1003: 144: 1309:
If these two terms mean the same thing, should we add the other terminology in the lead? E.g. Orthogonal matrix, or orthonormal matrix, etc.
1809: 1515:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
957:
The definition is with respect to a fixed inner product. It's not reasonable to expect a matrix to preserve all possible inner products.
1324: 1063:
a direct counterexample to the statement "Stronger than the determinant restriction is the fact that an orthogonal matrix can always be
861: 638: 1623:: Ki, so KiB for 1024 bytes. Similarly, the only correct terminology to refer to a matrix that is orthonormal is "orthonormal matrix". 1423: 1106: 135: 96: 306:
with this article. However, I do seem to remember having seen it used somewhere (hmm, that's a contorted verbal construction). --
214: 39: 1706:
nobody owns math). My argument is that the existing sources do not matter, they are wrong. In my opinion it is irrelevant that
1754:
for this concept. Yes, I agree the inconsistency is annoying, but it's what we have at the moment. To be frank, claiming that
1796:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1782: 1294: 1149:"An orthogonal matrix is a square matrix whose columns and rows are orthogonal unit vectors (i.e., orthonormal vectors)," 1072: 346:" is at odds with standard mathematical practice, including applied mathematics and physics. To quote from the article, 71: 1733:
per the Adumbrativus and HTinC23. This is not a close question, please find something better to do with your time. --
1480: 244: 1684: 947: 1680: 1506: 1409: 407:
I've seen "othronormal" used in courses as well. It may be a less popular alternative. I'll make a note as such.
27: 223: 428: 865: 1672: 1320: 927: 266: 1605: 1541: 443: 311: 274: 522: 1719: 1628: 1571: 1516: 1488: 1129: 1064: 943: 331: 77: 1396:
are drawn. Moreover, the aforementioned definition of orthogonality can be applied to complex matrices
923: 121: 922:
must also be an orthogonal matrix because the vectors are still orthogonal(but no longer orthonormal)
459: 327: 1751: 1668: 1585: 1415: 1312: 1282: 1098: 1084: 1080: 983: 979: 857: 59: 1738: 1649: 424: 1519:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1286: 143:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1453:
I do have a JPG screenshot/snippet showing the issue, but Knowledge would not let me upload it.
1316: 293: 229: 127: 35: 1405: 111: 90: 972: 292:
is standard anywhere. Perhaps someone created this page in an effort to popularize the term.
1778: 1711: 1696: 1676: 1601: 1553: 1537: 1290: 962: 599: 439: 412: 352: 307: 303: 270: 1592:
section 4.4, which flat-out says: 'The inverse is the transpose. In this square case we call
1343: 793: 1715: 1624: 1567: 1484: 1461: 1125: 225: 200: 386: 356: 1279:
can the usual 'dot product' inner product be used. At least that is how it seems to me.
1774: 1734: 1645: 1076: 1068: 902: 834: 1379: 973:
Paul's Online Math Notes linear algebra section is down (between January and May 2013)
882: 1803: 1759: 1638:
You can't just redefine "orthogonal", no matter how common it is to misuse this term.
1563: 1476: 1121: 323: 1763: 1692: 1688: 958: 408: 941:
Surely that's incorrect. For an arbitrary noncanonical inner product <a, b: -->
1619:" to be 1024 bytes instead of 1000 bytes. You can't just do that. This is why we 1457: 363: 140: 1675:
or recommend the "correct" terminology, but reflect the common usage, see e.g.
1596:
an orthogonal matrix. "Orthonormal matrix" would have been a better name for
397: 117: 227: 1620: 1786: 1742: 1723: 1700: 1653: 1632: 1609: 1575: 1546: 1492: 1465: 1427: 1328: 1298: 1133: 1110: 1088: 1053:{\displaystyle {\begin{bmatrix}2&0\\0&{\frac {1}{2}}\end{bmatrix}}} 966: 951: 931: 869: 447: 432: 416: 400: 335: 315: 296: 278: 1376:, and makes no requirement regarding the field from which the elements of 1616: 1438:
Hello, this is my first ever comment on a Knowledge mathematics article.
1120:
That matrix Bilingsley presents is an orthogonal matrix. Its vectors are
366:, which is the case if and only if its rows form an orthonormal basis of 351:
A real square matrix is orthogonal if and only if its columns form an
1528:, consensus is that the current title is the COMMONNAME of the topic 1707: 783:{\displaystyle det(Id)=1=det(QQ^{T})=det(Q)det(Q^{T})=det(Q)^{2}=1} 1095:
Your matrix isnt orthogonal, so the statement does not apply.
899:
is an orthogonal matrix then according to the current version
230: 194: 53: 15: 1197:
where repeated indices are summed. But the inner product of
1677:
https://netspeak.org/#q=%5Borthogonal+orthonormal%5D+matrix
1584:. The term "orthogonal matrix" is overwhelmingly standard; 1447:
It displays as $ Q^{\mathrm {T}}Q = QQ^{\mathrm {T}}=I,$
1475:
Orthogonal means that the vectors are perpendicular. See
26:
On 13 October 2023, it was proposed that this article be
1558: 31: 1012: 1382: 1346: 1006: 905: 885: 837: 796: 641: 602: 525: 462: 139:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1756:the existing sources do not matter, they are wrong 1388: 1368: 1052: 914: 891: 846: 823: 782: 627: 588: 511: 324:http://mathworld.wolfram.com/OrthonormalBasis.html 302:It is indeed nonstandard, so I merged the article 1471:Orthogonal and orthonormal are not the same thing 1079:1." that follows??? Is this statement correct? ( 937:Orthogonal matrices preserve inner products?? 238:This page has archives. Sections older than 8: 1750:, (again) because the current title is the 1261:). Only when the basis is orthonormal and ( 1691:until its prevalence in reliable sources.— 1505:The following is a closed discussion of a 1413: 1280: 1096: 85: 1444:Instead of displaying as Q{^T}Q = QQ^{T} 1381: 1351: 1345: 1032: 1007: 1005: 904: 884: 836: 795: 768: 737: 691: 640: 610: 601: 524: 479: 461: 1305:Orthogonal matrix =? Orthonormal matrix 248:when more than 10 sections are present. 87: 57: 1755: 1708:Charles Hermite used this term in 1854 1637: 1400:, and is not equivalent to unitarity. 1420:2601:19B:B00:87A0:7108:9F93:3ED6:8DB0 1103:2601:19B:B00:87A0:F574:DC63:8623:4EB0 7: 1524:The result of the move request was: 1335:Orthogonal matrices need not be real 635:if Q is orthogonal, we can see that 589:{\displaystyle det(AB)=det(A)det(B)} 133:This article is within the scope of 1714:, words can't simply be redefined. 1075:, all of which must have (complex) 76:It is of interest to the following 1815:High-priority mathematics articles 14: 512:{\displaystyle det(A^{T})=det(A)} 242:may be automatically archived by 153:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 1792:The discussion above is closed. 199: 156:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 120: 110: 89: 58: 19: 173:This article has been rated as 1590:Introduction to Linear Algebra 1498:Requested move 13 October 2023 812: 806: 765: 758: 743: 730: 718: 712: 697: 681: 660: 651: 583: 577: 565: 559: 544: 535: 506: 500: 485: 472: 401:22:53, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 336:16:55, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 1: 1466:22:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC) 147:and see a list of open tasks. 1810:B-Class mathematics articles 1787:11:42, 21 October 2023 (UTC) 1743:19:36, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 1724:19:03, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 1701:17:26, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 1671:. We don't use Knowledge to 1654:19:34, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 1633:02:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 1610:01:07, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 1576:17:54, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 1547:13:58, 21 October 2023 (UTC) 1493:17:35, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 1329:13:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC) 1134:17:45, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 1089:14:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC) 448:12:01, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 433:11:40, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 417:00:34, 2 November 2009 (UTC) 362:with the ordinary Euclidean 1685:google:"orthonormal matrix" 1481:Orthogonality_(mathematics) 1299:10:54, 19 August 2018 (UTC) 1146:The first few lines state: 1831: 1710:. To me it's like arguing 1681:google:"orthogonal matrix" 967:04:57, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 952:17:14, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 297:03:18, 22 March 2003 (UTC) 1428:15:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC) 1111:00:19, 7 March 2021 (UTC) 1071:to exhibit a full set of 932:20:59, 1 April 2014 (UTC) 870:17:24, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 628:{\displaystyle QQ^{T}=Id} 172: 105: 84: 1794:Please do not modify it. 1760:verifiability, not truth 1512:Please do not modify it. 1369:{\displaystyle O^{T}O=I} 988:02:46, 27 May 2013 (UTC) 824:{\displaystyle det(Q)=1} 316:14:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC) 286:I do not think the term 279:14:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC) 179:project's priority scale 1775:notify me of responses! 1621:created new terminology 267:Talk:orthonormal matrix 136:WikiProject Mathematics 1640:This is a weird idea: 1434:Latex formatting error 1390: 1370: 1054: 916: 893: 848: 825: 784: 629: 590: 513: 245:Lowercase sigmabot III 66:This article is rated 1588:applies. See Strang, 1391: 1371: 1055: 917: 894: 849: 826: 785: 630: 591: 514: 1406:Choudhury & Horn 1380: 1344: 1004: 903: 883: 835: 794: 639: 600: 523: 460: 159:mathematics articles 265:Section moved from 1559:Orthonormal matrix 1386: 1366: 1050: 1044: 997:Isn't the matrix 915:{\displaystyle cQ} 912: 889: 847:{\displaystyle -1} 844: 821: 780: 625: 586: 509: 289:orthonormal matrix 258:Orthonormal matrix 128:Mathematics portal 72:content assessment 36:Orthonormal matrix 1554:Orthogonal matrix 1535: 1532:non-admin closure 1430: 1418:comment added by 1410:Horn & Merino 1389:{\displaystyle O} 1315:comment added by 1301: 1285:comment added by 1113: 1101:comment added by 1040: 892:{\displaystyle Q} 860:comment added by 353:orthonormal basis 322:is also noted on 304:orthogonal matrix 282: 252: 251: 193: 192: 189: 188: 185: 184: 50: 49: 32:Orthogonal matrix 1822: 1771: 1770: 1767: 1561: 1529: 1514: 1395: 1393: 1392: 1387: 1375: 1373: 1372: 1367: 1356: 1355: 1331: 1059: 1057: 1056: 1051: 1049: 1048: 1041: 1033: 944:TotientDragooned 921: 919: 918: 913: 898: 896: 895: 890: 872: 853: 851: 850: 845: 830: 828: 827: 822: 789: 787: 786: 781: 773: 772: 742: 741: 696: 695: 634: 632: 631: 626: 615: 614: 595: 593: 592: 587: 518: 516: 515: 510: 484: 483: 263: 247: 231: 203: 195: 161: 160: 157: 154: 151: 130: 125: 124: 114: 107: 106: 101: 93: 86: 69: 63: 62: 54: 38:. The result of 23: 22: 16: 1830: 1829: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1768: 1765: 1764: 1557: 1510: 1500: 1473: 1436: 1378: 1377: 1347: 1342: 1341: 1337: 1310: 1307: 1278: 1274: 1267: 1260: 1253: 1246: 1242: 1235: 1231: 1224: 1217: 1210: 1203: 1196: 1192: 1185: 1181: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1144: 1069:complex numbers 1043: 1042: 1030: 1024: 1023: 1018: 1008: 1002: 1001: 995: 975: 939: 901: 900: 881: 880: 855: 833: 832: 792: 791: 764: 733: 687: 637: 636: 606: 598: 597: 521: 520: 475: 458: 457: 387:diagonal matrix 357:Euclidean space 260: 243: 232: 226: 208: 158: 155: 152: 149: 148: 126: 119: 99: 70:on Knowledge's 67: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1828: 1826: 1818: 1817: 1812: 1802: 1801: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1745: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1552: 1550: 1522: 1521: 1507:requested move 1501: 1499: 1496: 1472: 1469: 1435: 1432: 1385: 1365: 1362: 1359: 1354: 1350: 1336: 1333: 1306: 1303: 1276: 1272: 1265: 1258: 1251: 1244: 1240: 1233: 1229: 1222: 1215: 1208: 1201: 1194: 1190: 1183: 1179: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1143: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1115: 1114: 1061: 1060: 1047: 1039: 1036: 1031: 1029: 1026: 1025: 1022: 1019: 1017: 1014: 1013: 1011: 994: 991: 974: 971: 970: 969: 938: 935: 911: 908: 888: 876: 875: 874: 873: 843: 840: 820: 817: 814: 811: 808: 805: 802: 799: 779: 776: 771: 767: 763: 760: 757: 754: 751: 748: 745: 740: 736: 732: 729: 726: 723: 720: 717: 714: 711: 708: 705: 702: 699: 694: 690: 686: 683: 680: 677: 674: 671: 668: 665: 662: 659: 656: 653: 650: 647: 644: 624: 621: 618: 613: 609: 605: 585: 582: 579: 576: 573: 570: 567: 564: 561: 558: 555: 552: 549: 546: 543: 540: 537: 534: 531: 528: 508: 505: 502: 499: 496: 493: 490: 487: 482: 478: 474: 471: 468: 465: 451: 450: 425:Shinigami Josh 420: 419: 404: 403: 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 319: 318: 284: 283: 259: 256: 254: 250: 249: 237: 234: 233: 228: 224: 222: 219: 218: 210: 209: 204: 198: 191: 190: 187: 186: 183: 182: 171: 165: 164: 162: 145:the discussion 132: 131: 115: 103: 102: 94: 82: 81: 75: 64: 48: 47: 40:the discussion 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1827: 1816: 1813: 1811: 1808: 1807: 1805: 1795: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1746: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1669:WP:COMMONNAME 1666: 1663: 1662: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1586:WP:COMMONNAME 1583: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1560: 1555: 1549: 1548: 1545: 1543: 1539: 1533: 1527: 1520: 1518: 1513: 1508: 1503: 1502: 1497: 1495: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1477:Orthogonality 1470: 1468: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1454: 1451: 1448: 1445: 1442: 1439: 1433: 1431: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1411: 1407: 1401: 1399: 1383: 1363: 1360: 1357: 1352: 1348: 1334: 1332: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1317:MurrayScience 1314: 1304: 1302: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1271: 1264: 1257: 1250: 1239: 1228: 1221: 1214: 1211:is equal to ( 1207: 1200: 1189: 1178: 1153: 1150: 1147: 1141: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1045: 1037: 1034: 1027: 1020: 1015: 1009: 1000: 999: 998: 992: 990: 989: 985: 981: 968: 964: 960: 956: 955: 954: 953: 949: 945: 936: 934: 933: 929: 925: 909: 906: 886: 871: 867: 863: 862:84.78.203.218 859: 841: 838: 818: 815: 809: 803: 800: 797: 777: 774: 769: 761: 755: 752: 749: 746: 738: 734: 727: 724: 721: 715: 709: 706: 703: 700: 692: 688: 684: 678: 675: 672: 669: 666: 663: 657: 654: 648: 645: 642: 622: 619: 616: 611: 607: 603: 580: 574: 571: 568: 562: 556: 553: 550: 547: 541: 538: 532: 529: 526: 503: 497: 494: 491: 488: 480: 476: 469: 466: 463: 455: 454: 453: 452: 449: 445: 441: 437: 436: 435: 434: 430: 426: 418: 414: 410: 406: 405: 402: 399: 395: 388: 384: 380: 376: 373: 369: 365: 361: 358: 354: 350: 349: 348: 347: 345: 340: 339: 338: 337: 333: 329: 325: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 300: 299: 298: 295: 294:Michael Hardy 291: 290: 281: 280: 276: 272: 268: 262: 261: 257: 255: 246: 241: 236: 235: 221: 220: 217: 216: 212: 211: 207: 202: 197: 196: 180: 176: 175:High-priority 170: 167: 166: 163: 146: 142: 138: 137: 129: 123: 118: 116: 113: 109: 108: 104: 100:High‑priority 98: 95: 92: 88: 83: 79: 73: 65: 61: 56: 55: 52: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 25: 18: 17: 1793: 1747: 1730: 1664: 1641: 1602:Adumbrativus 1597: 1593: 1589: 1581: 1551: 1538:BegbertBiggs 1536: 1525: 1523: 1511: 1504: 1474: 1455: 1452: 1449: 1446: 1443: 1440: 1437: 1414:— Preceding 1402: 1397: 1338: 1311:— Preceding 1308: 1281:— Preceding 1269: 1262: 1255: 1248: 1237: 1226: 1219: 1212: 1205: 1198: 1187: 1176: 1154: 1151: 1148: 1145: 1142:Introduction 1097:— Preceding 1065:diagonalized 1062: 996: 976: 940: 924:Ranadeakshay 877: 790:. So Either 440:Jitse Niesen 423:changing it 421: 382: 378: 374: 371: 367: 359: 343: 320: 308:Jitse Niesen 288: 287: 285: 271:Jitse Niesen 264: 253: 239: 213: 205: 174: 134: 78:WikiProjects 51: 43: 1752:common name 1716:Aaronfranke 1679:or compare 1625:Aaronfranke 1568:Aaronfranke 1517:move review 1485:Aaronfranke 1126:Aaronfranke 1073:eigenvalues 856:—Preceding 364:dot product 150:Mathematics 141:mathematics 97:Mathematics 1804:Categories 1712:WP:SKYBLUE 1564:Orthogonal 1122:orthogonal 1081:Bilingsley 993:Properties 980:Gsspradlin 1673:prescribe 1642:of course 1526:Not moved 1067:over the 44:Not moved 1783:contribs 1617:kilobyte 1416:unsigned 1325:contribs 1313:unsigned 1295:contribs 1283:unsigned 1099:unsigned 858:unsigned 328:Kruzicka 240:365 days 206:Archives 1693:HTinC23 1287:Oward98 1077:modulus 959:Mct mht 409:Danielx 381:, with 355:of the 177:on the 68:B-class 1748:Oppose 1731:Oppose 1665:Oppose 1582:Oppose 1458:CJ7903 1408:, and 596:, and 456:Since 344:matrix 74:scale. 1689:WP:NC 1398:as is 1275:) = δ 1225:) = ( 1159:= (Q) 831:or = 398:KSmrq 30:from 28:moved 1779:talk 1766:Anon 1739:talk 1720:talk 1697:talk 1683:and 1667:per 1650:talk 1629:talk 1606:talk 1572:talk 1542:talk 1489:talk 1479:and 1462:talk 1424:talk 1321:talk 1291:talk 1204:and 1155:(QQ) 1130:talk 1107:talk 1085:talk 984:talk 963:talk 948:talk 928:talk 866:talk 444:talk 429:talk 413:talk 332:talk 312:talk 275:talk 169:High 42:was 1769:126 1735:JBL 1646:JBL 1175:= ( 1167:= Q 854:. 269:-- 34:to 1806:: 1785:) 1781:/ 1777:/ 1762:. 1741:) 1722:) 1699:) 1652:) 1631:) 1608:) 1574:) 1556:→ 1509:. 1491:) 1464:) 1426:) 1327:) 1323:• 1297:) 1293:• 1277:ij 1173:kj 1169:ki 1165:kj 1161:ik 1157:ij 1132:) 1124:. 1109:) 1091:) 1087:) 986:) 965:) 950:) 930:) 868:) 839:− 519:, 446:) 431:) 415:) 385:a 377:= 334:) 314:) 277:) 1773:( 1737:( 1718:( 1695:( 1648:( 1627:( 1615:" 1604:( 1598:Q 1594:Q 1570:( 1544:) 1540:( 1534:) 1530:( 1487:( 1460:( 1422:( 1384:O 1364:I 1361:= 1358:O 1353:T 1349:O 1319:( 1289:( 1273:m 1270:e 1268:, 1266:n 1263:e 1259:m 1256:e 1254:, 1252:n 1249:e 1247:( 1245:m 1243:) 1241:i 1238:Q 1236:( 1234:n 1232:) 1230:i 1227:Q 1223:j 1220:Q 1218:, 1216:i 1213:Q 1209:j 1206:Q 1202:i 1199:Q 1195:k 1193:) 1191:j 1188:Q 1186:( 1184:k 1182:) 1180:i 1177:Q 1171:Q 1163:Q 1128:( 1105:( 1083:( 1046:] 1038:2 1035:1 1028:0 1021:0 1016:2 1010:[ 982:( 961:( 946:( 926:( 910:Q 907:c 887:Q 864:( 842:1 819:1 816:= 813:) 810:Q 807:( 804:t 801:e 798:d 778:1 775:= 770:2 766:) 762:Q 759:( 756:t 753:e 750:d 747:= 744:) 739:T 735:Q 731:( 728:t 725:e 722:d 719:) 716:Q 713:( 710:t 707:e 704:d 701:= 698:) 693:T 689:Q 685:Q 682:( 679:t 676:e 673:d 670:= 667:1 664:= 661:) 658:d 655:I 652:( 649:t 646:e 643:d 623:d 620:I 617:= 612:T 608:Q 604:Q 584:) 581:B 578:( 575:t 572:e 569:d 566:) 563:A 560:( 557:t 554:e 551:d 548:= 545:) 542:B 539:A 536:( 533:t 530:e 527:d 507:) 504:A 501:( 498:t 495:e 492:d 489:= 486:) 481:T 477:A 473:( 470:t 467:e 464:d 442:( 427:( 411:( 389:. 383:D 379:D 375:M 372:M 368:R 360:R 330:( 310:( 273:( 215:1 181:. 80:: 46:.

Index

moved
Orthogonal matrix
Orthonormal matrix
the discussion

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
High
project's priority scale

1
Lowercase sigmabot III
Talk:orthonormal matrix
Jitse Niesen
talk
14:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Michael Hardy
03:18, 22 March 2003 (UTC)
orthogonal matrix
Jitse Niesen
talk
14:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.