2432:
confusion (this is specially favoured by trans women, as mentioned in the japanese wikipedia article). Also important to note that while "otokonoko" fits within " japanese crossdressing culture", it does not mean crossdressing and does not necessarily involve crossdressing. Japan has other words for crossdressing and crossplaying specifically. There are popular celebs and media characters who are described as otokonoko and do not crossdress, just being naturally "female-looking". The main characteristic of an otokonoko is what japanese people would describe as "a male body but passing as female". There are also crossdressers and crossplayers who would not fit the otokonoko label, as it is defined by the "ability to pass as female". Otokonoko often involves crossdressing, and it's largely a "crossdressing culture", but it is not about crossdressing. This needs to be clarified in the article at some point, just like it is discussed in the japanese wikipedia article. While the title could stay as "Otokonoko (cross-dressing)" for brevity, it may not be the most appropriate choice, considering it does not mean crossdressing. However, since "male-girl" is a slang in and of itself, some could argue it also wouldn't be the most appropriate descriptor for the title, despite being the direct translation and a more proper description. I leave that up for discussion.
3500:. You definitely do need a source. The transgenderzone is not a reliable source. Plus the fact they think "Trap Queen" is significantly related to trans women backs up their inaccuracy. Second, GLAAD does not support the claim it's cited for. GLAAD labels the formal version of "trap" as offensive specifically against transgender people. It doesn't label the slang term as offensive in a general sense or against otokonokos. To put it another way, one context of a word being offensive doesn't make the general or slang context offensive. Also, reminder to sign your replies. I recommend undoing the manual revert while a discussion takes place as it is far more accurate than the current extreme simplification/generalization of the term trap.
4142:?) Whilst I do agree with some of their sources being non-RS, this shouldn't be a reason to call the thesis itself non RS, nor does it automatically invalidade the rest of the contents. It touching upon those only makes sense when researching and trying to establish usage of a slang term with no "academic" definition (and even if there was one, it'd ultimately have to be based on something non-RS). The only problem I see is that the reference given there for the might be considered offensive part is something indeed something not RS by any means, but imo this comes back to the previous sentence. Quoting the offensive part like
3896:
that the word has no problem contexts. My problem is that the
Transgender Zone is not a reliable source and that GLAAD didn't back up your claim to label the entire slang as offensive. You seem to be dead set on telling the reader that the formal version of a slang in a different context on a different group of people is offensive. And I am not fully against that but that is not what you did with the past edit. You seem to be arguing an opinion on the offensiveness of "trap" formal and/or slang. I am arguing your sources are bad or don't support the claim.
531:
510:
541:
3586:
transgender people but it doesn't make the entire term offensive, eg "crossdresser." The
Transgender Zone comment is by an unnamed individual with no sources. The site doesn't seem better than a normal blog. GLAAD has it as defamatory as much as "deceptive," "fooling," "pretending," "posing," and "masquerading" and specifically in the context of transgender people. It is not talking about the slang nor labeling the entire word as offensive. It would be like linking GLADD to say "posing" is an offensive general word.
4910:
not is not given by GLAAD. "not sure where you got "With an associated presumption that all
Otokonoko are crossdressing" An otokonoko "is a Japanese term for men who have a culturally feminine gender expression." as listed by the article. It's definition is about a crossdresser. If it said gender identity then it would be different. And if you wish to go down that route then a English based website based on an English populace probably shouldn't be speaking for Japanese otokonokos. Still waiting on that quote.
3881:. There's a LOT of nuance here that apparently you're just not getting, and if four sources and two people saying "trap" is a problem isn't getting through, frankly I don't know what will, and I have to conclude you're being willfully obstinate. You still haven't provided any sources stating that the slang usage isn't problematic, or explained why you're so dead-set on including the term. Please take a deep breath, reread this entire discussion carefully, and start trying to collaborate.
1121:
1100:
2045:
pictures of apparent girls in it. Given the relative obscurity of this topic (would it be safe to assume you also came here from RSN having not heard of it before?) it is my assumption that there are more readers like myself than there are ones who are looking for an article on cross-dressing by searching for the present title, but I may be wrong, given that the only reason I stumbled across the page was because of my activities as a
Knowledge editor rather than reader.
2575:
which claim it *is* offensive should carry more weight than blog posts which don't (i.e. the current citation). Between (1) not saying anything, (2) mentioning the term and explaining why it is problematic, and (3) mentioning the term but not explaining, #2 would preferable and #3 is worst of all. I am going to make an edit in pursuit of #2. Regardless, #1 should be preferable to #3 and it is irresponsible and harmful for reverts to prefer #3 as the "default state".
2742:
that trap is conflicted terminology at best? Perhaps you should try making a page about “traps”, as it appears to be unrelated to the origin of this decidedly
Japanese term, “otokonoko”. “Trap” or “otokonoko” are not listed terms under the anime wiki heading, further showing the lack of relevance. I will bring this to the attention of LGBTQ wiki project and the Anime/Manga project for further support, provided you continue to not accept the removal of the term.
1295:. Secondly, in my opinion it is sophistry, for with the same logic one can deny that Kodomo no Jikan is lolicon, because the source says "little girl", not "loli", or Oreimo is not about incest, because in the source "imouto", not "sister". Similarly, this word does not mean any original, unique type of characters. Outside of individual Otokonoko works like Himegoto and real life, this word is actually practically a synonym for the English "crossdresser male".
1209:
207:
186:
636:
615:
4530:. "collection of random knowledge" like a formal word of a slang term being offensive on another group of people? If you believe a removal of content needs a consensus then you should have no problem with me re-adding trap's slang definition back in, right? As you have ignored this question twice now. If you have no disagreement in your next reply I'll be re-adding the slang definition that was removed without a consensus.
710:
1628:
for the concept under 日本以外での広まり (Section 4). It also specifies the analogues (though not exact equivalents) that are used in "the West," specifically 「gender bender」&「cross dressing」. And while there's a notice that large portions of the article are self-studied or unclear, that particular section seems usable after translation. At the very least, I think an improved version of that section could be added here.
352:
1371:: you have sources that discuss two particular works, and you want to use this to make a statement about the whole genre the works belong to. That's not how we work. If you want to write "otokonoko is x", then you need to cite a source that says "otokonoko is x", not just "anime such-and-such is x". You can use these sources as a basis for articles about the two specific works, but not about the whole genre.
114:
96:
4547:, if you want to throw policies at me. I agree with the slang definition being removed. This is how consensus works - it's not always in your favor. If you're that desperate to have it included, take it to the appropriate noticeboard, since 8ya and I have been trying to find compromises with you and your are refusing to work with us. At this point your edits are tendentious and you're just trying to
1012:
124:
1131:
1022:
991:
65:
3929:
is specifically talking about gender identity. "implications" that doesn't sound reliable. The definition of "trap" the slang makes no mention of "trapping" people "into thinking their gender is something it's not." I sincerely doubt violence was over the slang "trap" so I assume you mean "gender is something it's not" In which case that does not seem related and to be original research.
4825:
4350:
to me because if GLAAD is related with the formal version of trap then surely the slang is also related. This isn't the first time this has come up and I do not wish to have repeat conversations. Having both the slang and disclaimer is a nice compromise. So I'll ask one more time before I "do as you see fit with GLAAD." Are you fine with having the slang definition reverted back in?
1451:
21:
4172:(Dissertations) for additional reasoning and understand that's for far more reliable essays. Do you have any information making this to appear anything beyond an essay for college? It is indeed not reliable. I have shared your view on reliability on slang terms in the past but it has been pointed out to me that it still doesn't make it reliable. Are we still in disagreement?
217:
3453:
remove it immediately. Surprised this hasn't been caught earlier. 2. Replacement of the vice French source with the Vice Japan YouTube video in it. Skipping over if the Vice French is reliable or not. The 1 paragrapth contents of it doesn't support the claims it's cited for. The video does. If there are any disagreements please mention them. I'll be waiting a few days.
3036:) is more interesting, and leads on to a broader question of what the topic of this article is, or should be - a Japanese cultural phenomenon (heterosexual men crossdressing for aesthetic purposes) or a term used in (English?) anime & manga circles. We currently introduce the topic as the former, but spend 2/3rds of the article discussing the latter. -
1391:
the otokonoko genre. I just want to say that such characters can be used for pseudo-lesbian experiences and/or fanservice, and this has an ambiguous evaluation, and not that the genre itself plays with it. Generally, although this is not an argument for wikipedia, I think that now most non-yaoi works with otokonoko are pseudo-yuri like
3799:
obviously is), and that the word isn't also used as a slur, however that in this situation it would be wrong to simply state it is a slur. See for example the "Kroon, Richard" usage which by itself bears no pejorative meaning in it. Maybe it would be good adding that depending on the context the word can also be taken to be a slur.
4503:
deals with otokonoko (the article differentiates between them). My point is that as of right now we have only one source that links the terms, and this is a tiny article. Is it necessary to include "trap" as a term, noting that
Knowledge is not a collection of random knowledge and that it's inclusion could be considered
4705:
trap like "deceptive," "fooling," "pretending" are also all formal and point to the formal definition of trap. "Trap" as mentioned in otokonoko and source is a slang version. The way I'm reading your comment is like asking for a source on the distinction between trap (the mouth) vs trap the formal word.
5101:
I don't really care about the specifics if anyone has issue with the term 'cross-dresser' and wants to use 'man that looks like a woman', but I think the difference in spelling and meaning should come up in search so as to not mislead people. If anyone has any ideas on how this could be achieved, I'm
4349:
refers to a category invoked in context of a video which to me is under "artistic piece." Don't have a reference for the disclaimer, as you said yourself "I agree with the disclaimer not fitting in there, which is why I hoping to have a reference in there connecting the two." It's either both or none
3928:
It really isn't. It's not "someone" it's specifically "transgender people." Otokonokos are not "presenting as an alternate gender" as they still identify as male, although I do not know for sure if you mean gender expression or gender identity. I am assuming the later. If it was the former then GLAAD
2741:
Cross-dressing is a part of the trans umbrella, thereby this is intrinsically linked to trans identity. The issue is that you are disregarding that your own sources note the insulting nature of the term “trap”, and you are choosing to ignore it. Why are you forcing this without any addendum regarding
2574:
Hello, trans anime fan here. This edit war is really upsetting to see. In my opinion, the term is offensive, pedantic nitpicking over whether the dictionary definition ("deceiving") does not magically make it inoffensive and is thus irrelevant, and blog posts (or reddit administrative decisions, etc)
2044:
That seems fair. FWIW, I came to this article because I was on RSN for reasons unrelated to this page, and I don't think I had never heard of this concept before. Without reading the discussion at RSN I clicked on the article and for a brief moment was confused why an article called "boy" had several
1825:
among a very small group of people who (a) are deeply familiar with
Japanese cross-dressing culture (or whatever this is -- a quick Google search indicated it is deeply associated with relatively obscure manga/anime, which would "fit" with the type of punning involved), and (b) don't actually speak a
1627:
My concern isn't that the page isn't clear or that a part of it may not be true, but that the page as a whole is... lacking. While, as you said, the page is succinct, the
Japanese version of the page seems to have additional details that could be added over here. At a glance, it had alternative terms
1390:
You did not understand. This word does not mean ONLY GENRE, it is also used as the name of a certain type of character. My text spoke only about the use of characters, not the genre. This absolutely does not make sense, because both of these titles use
Otokonoko characters, but are not not created in
4880:
Of course not. Same with the other words. It's not labeling "deceptive," "fooling," "pretending," "posing," "trap," or "masquerading" as always defamatory. But it is specifically on a transgender people not simply GNC people. It clearly says "Do not characterize transgender people as "deceptive," as
4632:
I would not agree, which is part of why we're having this discussion in the first place. The disclaimer makes perfect sense and is relevant to the article and the term that you're insisting on including. A single tenuous source isn't enough verifiability to include "trap" in the article at all would
4521:
I'm using DeepL. "The
English title of the game is 'Trap Shrine', but 'Trap' is a well-known slang term for a 'man's daughter' used by overseas anime lovers and sometimes gamers as well." seems quite clear. There have been multiple sources but people wish for an air tight reliability usually only in
4435:
Establish consensus BEFORE making changes, Sneaky. The term is offensive IRL, GLAAD supports that, it should be left in. I would also like to add that barring additional sources, I'm starting to lean towards not including "trap" at all. One source really isn't enough to include it when we take undue
4057:
I removed a few references at the end due to overcitation and changed the wording a bit, to make it more clear that those usages aren't the same (although now I think the ref doesn't fit so well?). Also I agree with the "however" feeling better, but imo it's better to have it in a new sentence. Feel
3654:
You are the one making the new claim therefore must have sources that are reliable and support that claim. You seem to think that I'm making a new claim. I am not. I am telling you your sources are either unreliable or do not support the claim. May I remind you, that you did not gain a consensus for
3480:
some editors feel it shouldn't be noted as such, or that it should be noted as only offensive to trans women. At the time of this comment, there are two sources, GLAAD and the Transgender Zone) to back up the 'offensive' designation. Do we need more sources to call a slur a slur, or can we all agree
3452:
Some quick edits that I doubt people will disagree with. Without any disagreements I will edit the following: 1. Removal of "as well as preoperative transgender women" As this was added on Aug 7 without a source and none of the current sources support it either. I welcome anyone to skip the wait and
3086:
Well it's been more challanged that people don't like the slang not so much the existence of the slang. One third is the translation. Another third for the former then only a third for the later. I don't see why it has to be an "or" when it's a "both." It is a term used in anime and manga circles to
2677:
The current listed sources that SlySneakyFox added literally state that “trap” is an offensive term... They state the relation to trans characters. Only one source mentions a passing relation to otokonoko. These sources further elaborate the insulting idea of “trapping” individuals or deceiving them
2559:
The corresponding Japanese page for otokonoko lists the term kinder the offensive “to trap” meaning. The page is further under the Japanese LGBT culture grouping, showing its direct relation to LGBTQ and trans identity. SlySneskyFox suggesting that this is false equivalency relates to the previously
2483:
There's a lot of edit warring over this section. There are multiple articles that show that the term was associated with otokonoko, but if editors disagree with this then it should be redirected to the subsection in Reddit pertaining to 2020 and r/Animemes banning the use of the word. Please discuss
2263:
I agree. I'd do it myself immediately, but I've got a backlog of drafts I didn't get finished during Asian Month and really should take priority, and anyone who looks at my contribs for the last month or so will see that I haven't had a whole lot of time to write articles, especially ones outside my
1465:
The problem starts with a badly-written article (as short as it is), and continues with a badly-written paragraph - a state of affairs that makes a factual discussion difficult. What I'd like to see is this: first, the article has to be readable (if you wish I can do the editing myself); second, the
5081:
I think everyone can agree the common usage and understanding of the term "otokonoko" to mean "male child". So, I find it very strange that a article exists that uses that term with a entirely unrelated meaning "man that looks like a woman". I understand that a subculture picked the term to use for
4943:
I think I understand what you mean. I was thinking formal in the same way as deceptive/deceiving is formal. Arguing whether it is slang or formal is not my main point, so I don't mind leaving it behind. My main point is that trap in GLAAD is not referencing a feminine men/otokonoko nor is it saying
4909:
Yes, GLAAD is silent on trap on crossdressers. Keep in mind the slang does not mean "a dangerous or unpleasant situation..." It means "A type of character common to anime; one who is identified as male, but who is depicted as quite beautiful and feminine." Whether it's offensive to crossdressers or
4704:
Kroon 2010 would be that source but I'm not sure what you mean for a distinction. A slang term has a different meaning then the formal same word. GLAAD uses the formal version of trap, as exhibited by "trapping." There's nothing in GLAAD to point that it is using the slang term and the words around
4680:
I know you don't have a problem with otokonoko. GLAAD is about the formal trap not the slang. It is original research because it makes no mention of otokonoko. You provided group blogs which are not a reliable sources and were definitely not neutral point of view. GLAAD should be completely removed
4502:
be reliable, it's the first time I've encountered it, but... were you just using the Google translation? Not sure if you speak Japanese, but I do, and the meaning doesn't quite come through via Google - the article is pointing out that although it's called "Trap Shrine", the game's content actually
4213:
I really do not consider it reliable as it is just repeating unreliable sources. I do not understand how you see it as more reliable then GLAAD or a published slang dictionary. With the permission you just given I will be changing it back. I'm not exactly sure what "keep it at the beginning" meant.
4005:
Grammatically, it flows better as a 'however' at the end of the sentence in which it is introduced (the way it is currently). Not sure what you plan to discuss in terms of sources, as GLAAD clearly supports the existing sentence, and the remaining four sources on that line were copied directly from
3895:
The number of sources doesn't matter when they are blog articles. Besides GLAAD, which is about the formal "trap". The sources are not up to standard. "two people saying 'trap' is a problem" I also recommend rereading the discussion or simply the 2 replies from the other user. Again I am not saying
3779:
Thanks for your bold edit, although I would've preferred we come to a consensus first on a debated topic. The sources I've provided make it clear that when used in the context of someone presenting as an alternate gender, "trap" is a slur, with the implication being that they are 'trapping' someone
3246:
It's certainly promising that the book is published by an academic publisher, albeit a small one. That's better than group blogs. But it's not so promising that a search of the content for "Otokonoko", "男の娘" doesn't yield any results. What text from the source? And what content in the article would
2789:
The WikiProjects (LGBT, Anime/Manga) that I mentioned are just two of the multiple Wiki groups who have currently marked this page for assessment, due to the disputed use of “trap”. They are the ones listed in the big yellow banner at the top of the the talk page. This article falls under review of
2408:
as a general source for any broad-topic articles on Japan. Their main target audience is Japanese people seeking to read "natural English", and I've seen fairly strong evidence that they routinely sacrifice factual accuracy in favour servicing this audience. Cross-dressing is surely a popular topic
4647:
Why do you disagree? Otokonoko is not at all even mentioned in GLAAD. The slang version of trap is also not mention and otokonokos are not transgender people. How are you connecting it, is my question. The source is not tenuous as it is very reliable, even peer reviewed. Also, do you disagree with
3163:
I recommend posting every source in this article and every single one of mine. For you will see none or maybe 1 will pass out of all of them. This is not a historical event or fact. This is translation of a slang term in another language. There is no concrete answer like 2+2=4. If you wish to talk
2957:
Fincher here, sharing some light on the meaning. The Japanese themselves translate "Otokonoko" as "trap", for example the Anime, "Ore, Twintails ni Narimasu" featured a display of the phrase in English&Japanese: "Trap" is the phrase originally intended by Otokonoko-artists, I see no reason to
2886:
Newmo is also not reliable - it's a job recruitment site. SoraNews24, I would also put in the blog category, but it's used more broadly, so worth asking at WP:RSN. Vice & Kotaku are more likely considered reliable, but also worth asking about. I'll draft something there a little later. AERAdot
2756:
You can use DeepL or google translate or any other translation program. The source supports the claim. A man with a feminine gender expression is not trans. A slang term for a men is obviously an insult towards a trans woman. It would be an unnecessary addition to explain that. This article is not
2693:
Only one source has it listed as "kind of rude" which is a reach from "literally state that 'trap' is an offensive term" then goes to list it as well known, which is the point. GLAAD has normal word trap as a rude term against trans people along with "fooling" and other similar terms. This article
2431:
Important to clarify that while Otokonoko (男の子) means "boy", the Otokonoko slang and cultural identity (男の娘) does *not*. It is a play on the word but it's meaning is not "boy", but rather "male girl". In fact, the slang is sometimes pronounced as "otoko no musume" in order to avoid or clarify this
2145:
I'm inclined to disagree on principle (I know we don't like "unnecessary disambiguators", but precision in article titles and the principle of least astonishment are also factors that need to be taken into consideration -- this is an obscure topic, and probably the majority of its readers are more
3585:
Repeating that you believe it to be a slur doesn't make it so. Neither does posting blog articles. It is not up to the defense to back up a claim. It's like requesting a source that triangle is not a slur. "A word that's offensive is offensive" you realize many words are offensive when applied to
2719:
This entire article is based on articles as secure as mine. My sources are as fine as the rest. There I used a previous source, even. The fact that I have to specifically point out repeat sources (as before with dansou) is infuriating as it in my opinion shows that people come to this article and
2539:
Perhaps on a page about LGBT derogatory terms but "some degree" is far too loose to relate it in this page. This is a page about man with a feminine gender expression not trans people. Imagine if editors went to every possible word that can be used in a derogatory way. GLAAD mentions is alongside
1597:
Though quite a bit of the information on the Japanese page looks like lists of people, television shows and events, section 4 over there seems to specifically cite some of the terminology we use here. However, the article as a whole seems to have fallen victim to self-study and original ideas, so
1552:
Oh, you about this. This means only that, depending on the audience, this character can be considered both a male or female person. Therefore, the addition of such characters to titles with female cast does not cause any problems that would arise when adding casual male characters. That's why now
5141:
I’ve spent decades in Japan and my wife is Japanese. Otokonoko means male child. There is no feminine of any kind inside it. Saying it is “pronounced like otokonoko male child” does not make it right. This page should be deleted for flat out lying. Making obscure references to a manga (where the
3817:
I would support this (also, I appreciate your joining the discussion, and I greatly appreciate your calm tone). I can see how the definition given in the A/V book is not presented as a pejorative, but I do think it would be remiss to not mention that it's a slur in real-life situations. "Boy who
3562:
Thank you also for reminding me to sign my posts; please take this as your reminder to leave the reflist template below the conversation. I would also like to call attention to the fact that since you registered your account here on Knowledge, literally all of your edits have been about this one
1326:
Both of these works have otokonoko characters as the main charactrer to use pseudo-lesbian themes. Similar to the fact that Felix in ReZero and Astolfo in Apocrypha are otokonoko characters, but none of the English-speaking people will not call them by this word just to emphasize this. This is a
4742:
GLAAD is referring to "trap" as a noun for a male who presents a culturally feminine gender expression. That's not a definition found in OED, Cambridge, or Merriam-Webster, so would have to be a colloquial (slang) term. I'm not sure how any of the formal definitions for trap (noun) (ensnarement
4391:
isn't calling people otokonokos but invoking the category. Yes, the slang trap. Past editors have requested a disclaimer. The disclaimer is off topic and can cause confusion on what the slang means. So I have the definition added. I quote the entire definition not to include a specific part but
4020:
That's fine then. Do note that it wasn't the only thing I changed. The wording can be left as the same. Fully agree GLAAD is reliable and supports the claim. I can go in depth with the sources but the quick and short of it is that I do feel they are unreliable and just sticking with GLAAD is my
3798:
What I am trying to say that the context of the usage of the word differs, as this one, from my experience and the sources provided here, refers to a certain type of appearance given, not a gender identity or similar. I am not trying to say that there is no overlap between the two groups (there
2345:
and similar anime fan sites due to the fact that such sites keep getting used as sources of information on things like classical Japanese poetry due to their status as "reliable sources in general". But given that the source pre-dates the creation of this Knowledge article, I guess it should be
4752:
GLAAD is not referring to "trap" as a noun for a male who presents a culturally feminine gender expression. How do you get this? It does not even gender anything. There is nothing to point to this in the paragraph. Please quote me what sentence you see that supports this. Also, Merriam Webster
4451:
I did get a consensus first with the other editor and waited about day and a half to see if anyone would speak. They did not. The term is not offensive. It is a formal word. GLAAD references the formal word not the slang in a context that's not about otokonokos. It is off topic. I am fine with
4305:
also refers to a category and not specifically a person. I'm not sure what specific implications you are talking about. It seems what implications we see differs. I say just leave it as NekoKatsun's August 12 version minus the extra sources for the last sentence. For now since you don't have a
4257:
Got to disagree with the implication of "only." It says "common to anime" not "only to anime" after all. Then "referred to as a "trap" should become "referred to by the slang term "trap". While I understand it doesn't fit there neither does the disclaimer that it's offensive when used on trans
2068:
Started on similar searches to those done by Hijiri88, and can't see that the 男の娘 meaning is a sufficiently notable subject for a standalone article. It's a neologism (cf. NOTDICT) used to refer to concepts which are more commonly known by other (English) terms; and which are better covered as
3545:, but you have zero sources backing up your opinion that it's appropriate. A word that's offensive is offensive, full stop, and there are multiple sources to back that position up. What do you find unreliable about Transgender Zone? GLAAD notes the term is defamatory in general. Do you prefer
3131:. But it also might not matter - the dictionary content itself is sourced from JMdict, and presented without editing by Jisho.org; essentially just passed through - so it's the reliability of JMdict that's relevant. JMdict accepts public submissions, and is, therefore, likely to be considered
2896:
That's not really answering the question. That's just listing the reliability of each site according to you. What criteria are you using for reliability on a slang article? Let's be real this isn't a fact or historical event. How exactly do you want a reliable source for a translation besides
4899:
the distinction? That is offensive to describe a transgender person as "a dangerous or unpleasant situation which you have gotten into" or ""something by which one is caught", but it's not offensive to so describe a crossdressing person? (With an associated presumption that all Otokonoko are
1502:
Um, could you point out the problems with reading in my paragraph? English is not my native language, but it seemed to me that my paragraph was succinct enough that there would be no problems with grammar or reading. But in any case, I'm ready to rewrite it, if this helps solve the problem.
4186:
Thank you for that Scholarship link. Whilst I do agree with that care should be exercised and that secondary sources are preferred, I don't think that alone should be reason to not use this reference here, as it still appears to be reliable, more than the previous two or any other I could
2102:" or even some later work was what popularized it), which may be why it feels so weird to see such a silly pun taken so seriously on English Knowledge (and a few anime fansites). It might be difficult to convey to a non-Japanese-speaker just how bizarre the current article is, though...
4665:
I have no problem with otokonoko. I have a problem with "trap". If "trap" is mentioned in the article then GLAAD's notice that it's offensive applies. I've already provided sourcing stating that "trap" is offensive when used for any person acting outside of their assigned gender role.
2447:
I'm not sure if English is your first language, but for the vast majority of our readers either (a) they can't read Japanese text or (b) they know at least some Japanese. For all of these readers, the distinction between "Otokonoko (男の子)" and "Otokonoko (男の娘)" made in the above
2790:
multiple WikiProjects, because you keep making falsely attributed claims from unreliable sources. You are not following Wiki standards for editing either. There is no wiki page for the term “trap” as you claim to use it, because the term is not used as you describe it. Stop.
4617:
No. I am specifically only referencing the slang definition not the "An otokonoko character may be referred to as a "trap." Either both the definition and disclaimer are kept or both the definition and disclaimer are removed. The disclaimer is off topic would you not agree?
1290:
You can easily read in the first review that this vn is a kind of fantasy about hitting a straight man in a purely feminine yuri genre. It even spawned a separate "sub-genre" of yuri vn, where Otokonoko is used to simulate classic yuri with a heterosexual male protagonist
5089:
Right now, if you search for "otokonoko" it pops up with a description saying, "Japanese men who cross-dress as women", which for 99.9% of cases is wrong. Is there some way to edit this so it changes to "Boy(male child)"? or "not to be confused with 男の子: Male child: Boy"
4681:
and I was willing to compromise as long as the slang definition was added but now it is removed. The formal version of a slang in a different context doesn't significantly relate it to the article. And again what is your stance on the sources I have recently provided?
1971:
1327:
trivial fact. You overlook that this is only a Japanese euphemism for crossdresser male characters (therefore in the western fandom a more common euphemism "trap" is used), as imouto is a Japanese word meaning "sister". You will not require proofs that the premise of
4522:
this specific section but sources are still sources and I have provided with these 2 for a "may" which is not a overzealous statement about everybody. A game being translated, a article about it, and a peer reviewed article seem fine to me. Might I also point to you
4228:
I look at it as not as "repeating unreliable sources", but looking at the usage of a slang term in practice, among that being those unreliable sources, as a primary source – which is exactly what slang dictionaries do too. Also I wasn't talking about GLAAD, but
1983:
3745:
If it is clear that this term is being directed at transgender people or even non-trans people presenting as female (fancy dress, acting, gaming or drag) then the term negatively objectifies trans*people as a deceit, a lie, or someone who is fraudulent in
1820:
is a common Japanese word that just means "boy", so it can be expected to appear in the titles of a lot of Japanese media, etc., with that meaning; the relatively obscure punning usage that is the focus of the present article could only be considered the
4996:
I highly disagree with that, trap is a common term used for them, quite clearly not as a slur, so it should be mentioned. Also from my experience, and google trends, it is also the usual way to refer to them in the English speaking world, as opposed to
5093:
I think it would be better to just create a essentially blank page for the original term or a disambiguation page which comes up first in searches with both terms listed even if it links to an article that doesn't exist so that there is no confusion?
5085:
Normally a primary usage's page might have other usages listed, or a disambiguation page that lists many usages, but there doesn't seem to be a page for the actual original and common meaning of "otokonoko", which makes sense since it's just a word.
4123:
sources like urban dictionary or group blogs, especially around the term trap. Also, the source of the thesis' mention for the "offensive" remark says it may be offensive and may not be so it isn't really clear even if it wasn't a group blog.
2267:
That being said, I would note that "setting pictures next to the relevant text" doesn't really apply in this case, since there is no context given to the images anywhere in the current version of the article text or any earlier version, and
1519:
In addition, since such a character can simultaneously be perceived as a male, and an attractive "female" character, otokonoko can be used as a surrogate for a male audience in male-oriented genres with a traditionaly preeminently female
5077:
I've somehow lost my previous account and probably only edited one thing in the past. I'm not 100% sure about the rules but seeing this page and some of the conversations here, I felt I needed to comment about this so i made an account.
1974:
a simple search for the word brings up a lot of anime fansites of dubious reliability that use it in the sense described in this article, but at least one or two entries on each page (generally the ones that come from the more reputable
4573:
is an essay and if anyone here is trying to push anything it is the one that said "I feel that Knowledge's voice shouldn't normalize a slang term that's offensive in real life." Either both are kept as a compromise or both are removed.
5121:, so another page for that work wouldn't work, as there is no article content for the common use of otokonoko in Japanese. Maybe a disambiguation page that doesn't link to the common meaning would work? But I need to think more on it.
2642:
Good point. I'd missed that the same source is being used for other content. And other content which isn't even directly supported by that source - the equivalent of "dansou" would be "josou", not "otokonoko". I'll remove that too. -
1787:
3104:
Aight time for another talk. Now besides japanesewithanime you could argue my sources are a bit off. Not as much as a French vice article but a bit off. Now I have another source. Please tell me if you have any problems with Jisho.
4368:
If you want to explicitly express that definition it would be more fitting with the definitions at the start, although I don't see the point as it is already covered. Or them being common to anime is what you're trying to include?
3619:
You're absolutely right, it's not up to the defense... so why am I the one posting sources? You should be providing sources supporting your "inoffensive" narrative. If you want it changed, gain consensus for your preferred version
4079:
Agree about the over-referencing. I tweaked the structure and grammar a little to recombine the sentences and to simplify the overall reading, what do you think? I find the whole thing flows a little better now; I hope you agree!
4276:
I agree with the disclaimer not fitting in there, which is why I hoping to have a reference in there connecting the two. I think it would be best to avoid incorrect connections/implications with changing the wording around like
2511:
Blog articles are not reliable sources. This section is not to document reddit or any other site's drama. First source wasn't even GLAAD. Even in GLAAD it was grouped with words like "posing" and "deceiving" it is not related.
3563:
topic. As such I've taken the liberty of tagging your comment as such, so that everyone in the conversation is aware of its participants. Please note that this is not an accusation or attack; it's simply a statement of fact.
4096:
However thinking about it again the section seems out of place and more suited to be put in the first paragraph, with the definition part cut out. Also I went on google scholar and found a better source, although in Spanish
3438:
replying (previously involved editors excluded). Similarly to the previous posting, there was no support for the the proposed sources being considered reliable (p.i.e.e.). There was also concerns raised about the use of the
1785:
Thank you for your comment. I've been out of the page-moving game for a while, but I can see that inclusion of a parenthetical disambiguator when no other articles with this title currently exist may be problematic. I did
4601:
If you're comfortable with removing "trap" in its entirety, as I think you're suggesting from "Either both are kept as a compromise or both are removed", I would be in agreement with that. Is this what you're suggesting?
3147:
It might, if considered by consensus to be reliable, support some other text. That the JMdict entry for 男の娘 appears in the search list on Jisho.org doesn't, in itself, verify anything other than it appears in the search
651:
aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Knowledge. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
3822:). I feel that Knowledge's voice shouldn't normalize a slang term that's offensive in real life. Do you have any suggestions for editing that last sentence to incorporate that the term is offensive in certain contexts?
1990:
factor probably more than hatnote (I imagine the only readers who would read a hatnote before looking at the photo are those with browser or connection problems preventing the photo from displaying in a prompt manner)?
3392:
If these are the best sources we can find, it seems best to leave it out. The Shunsuke source is the closest, but the mention is too brief and vague to use in support of the claim—though we can guess this use is basic
4094:"term defined in slang" makes it sound like the definition is slang, not the term imo. I think it being defamatory should warrant its own sentence, and not tacked on to at the end of an already decently long sentence.
5097:
I'm not sure how well this would work with search, but it seems the most clear and concise way to label these pages would be... "Otokonoko(男の子: Male child: Boy)" and "Otokonoko(男の娘: Male Girl: Male Cross-dresser)".
3256:
An English version can be said to be the slang "trap n. A type of character common to anime; one who is identified as male, but who is depicted as quite beautiful and feminine." The part in quotes is from the book.
1799:
3655:
your edit and did not wait for a consensus to revert to your preferred version. I do welcome other users to give their opinion. Do you think GLAAD notes the term "pretending" as defamatory in general, as well?
3191:
No. We don't leave poor or poorly sourced content in article so that people can read it without having to dig through the edits. If there is something relevant for RSN, then mention it there, or link a diff. -
4924:
Whilst I agree with the GLAAD reference not fitting properly, I disagree with the formal/slang differentiation, not like using it as a slur is "formal". They're just different usages of the same word I'd say.
1642:
Ah, I see the confusion now. I was referring to the Japanese page as the one that has all the notices on it. I was just saying that the English article could be expanded with Section 4 of the Japanese one.
2150:), but per the below I think we've got a reasonable compromise in the interim, so I have no problem with the page being moved back as long as the hatnote is implemented and the image problem is addressed.
3397:, the parenthetical here could be interpreted by a reasonable reader to mean any number of different things, such as that only the subculture of Niconico posters is called "traps". (In other words, it's
1694:
2599:
Being offended or upset means nothing and is not a reason for removal of entries. This is not a page about trans people, citing every possible word that can be offensive in wiki entries is unnecessary.
4776:
The formal version of trap. "A device used for capture" or "a clever plan designed to trick somebody, either by capturing them or by making them do or say something that they did not mean to do or say"
2628:
It's the same source as the one for "dansou." The fact that people only remove "trap" shows pretty clear which side the bias is on. A source must be related to this article that's the standard I hold.
5143:
2804:
The source I use is listed before in this article as well and clearly says after translation that trap is indeed used. Your dislike of the word doesn't give you the credibility to just delete it.
1613:
Good afternoon, could you point to the part of the text that you are in doubt? Although the discussion of my paragraph was stalled, the current version of the article is quite laconic and true.
5029:"The consensus for the removal of the slang definition was the removal of GLAAD", I wasn't agreeing with you if that's what you mean. I only agreed about the GLAAD mention as it is looking off.
4119:
I prefer a "slang term define as..." but it's not really important. For your source I do not believe it to be reliable. The reason being a look over it's sources. A fair share are comprised of
4328:
This isn't an either both or none situation, but do as you see fit with GLAAD. I think the reference before was sufficient for what it's worth, but I'll leave this to other editors to decide.
783:
2694:
isn't about trans people, so it is not significantly related. Even if you believe it to be offensive that doesn't change the reality that this is what they are commonly called and known as.
886:
4101:, which also explicitly tells us that 'this' trap usage can be considered offensive (although doesn't mention transphobia) – I used google translate so if anything is wrong please tell me.
4235:
Ah yes that's what I meant. I removed the slang dictionary as it doesn't fit there, should be covered by the first paragrahp, and seems to imply that trap is only used for 2D (for example
1553:
Otokonoko is so common in the female slice of life, pseudo-yuri and anime about idols. Up to the point that some of the works with Otokonoko gets a yuri tag when licensing them in the US.
4466:
Like I said, we have only one source that's nearly a decade old linking the terms. The more I think about it the more it shouldn't be here at all. Doubtless you'll object to its removal?
1986:
is almost exclusively linguistic works giving the romanized Japanese word for "boy". Would you be opposed to moving images of "apparent girls" out of the lead? That would help with the
1980:
4392:
because the definition can be argued and a quote is the most clear. It seems the answer to my past question is "no" so I'll go ahead and "do as you see fit with GLAAD" by removing it.
5273:
5082:
their own needs and modified the Japanese spelling, but the issue is that it's spelled the same in English, which leads to confusion that doesn't exist when it's spelled in Japanese.
2678:
with one’s gender. These sources do more to prove the point that the GLAAD article was correct that this term is offensive, while showing little to no relation to this page’s topic.
597:
587:
2614:
You're blatantly holding a double standard about the quality of cited sources that support your argument versus the quality of sources that support everyone else's in this edit war.
2560:
mentioned “Reddit drama”, which seems to have influenced their history in editing this page exclusively. I nominate to remove his changes completely, and bar from further editing.
1242:
as her project even has a separate article. In any case, if you doubt the authoritative of this blog, you can always ask someone in the project "Anime" and all will be confirmed.
4480:
There are other sources that are also a decade old, do we also remove them? Nah. Why focus only on this one? It is reliable so it is cited. Do you consider this source reliable.
2371:
I'm happy to help, as and where able; although I do think 男の娘 comes in well down the list of topics that should be included in "Cross-dressing in Japan" - definitely after both
5278:
5268:
4565:
A consensus is not a vote either. And if it was the other editor agreed with giving me the ability to do whatever with the GLAAD source including removing it. I don't see how
3967:
First, before I get into the reliability of sources. Any objection with me making the last remark into a new sentence and editing it to the following: "'Trap' is considered a
1970:
A headnote seems like a fairly reasonable solution in the short-term, but I have to wonder about whether this article should really exist as a standalone in the long-term: on
733:
2272:
that explicitly refers to the subject as "otokonoko". Would removing the images pending a reliable source that explicitly to either Yakkun or Yukari as an 男の娘 be preferable?
963:
808:
758:
2720:
just make a straight line towards trap and automatically discredit whatever source supports it even if it's used in other areas in the article and are just as reliable.
2311:? 結佳梨Yukari doesn't have an article on the English or Japanese Wikipedias, and I'm not sure if we can verify that image properly, but I found quite a few posts with the
563:
439:
5303:
5117:
The problem is that I think the majority of cases where it is used in English (outside a language-learning context, that is), it is indeed used for crossdressers. And
2094:"young girl" or "daughter" except in slang, and none of the standard reference works appear to give it as a reading of the character 娘 (it wouldn't surprise me if the
1082:
1072:
927:
1657:
I see... Well, here I do not know how to help, as I was already trying to somehow supplement the article, but the discussion died down after a number of complaints.
5288:
1567:
Well, and what did we come up with in the end? The Japanese wiki mentions both works as a vivid example of the genre, and Okazu calls them as example of fake-yuri.
687:
677:
1807:
5308:
5258:
4214:
So I'll be taking it as to put the entire previous sentence back in the beginning where your sentence was. If this is not what you meant feel free to correct me.
299:
3285:
They have the same definition. What do you mean? That is the thing linking them. Also 男の娘 appears when "trap" is searched in Jisho. Do you consider that a link?
5298:
1877:
first and foremost, while the cross-dressing is a secondary topic. However, since our primary audience is English-language readers, if someone is searching for
1309:
I don't quite follow this. Where in the cited source does it say anything about the otokonoko genre in general, rather than about the specific works at issue?
1269:, e.g., that otokonoko is a "surrogate for a male audience". The sources discusses two anime or manga, but does not even mention the concept of otokonoko. See
3434:
The posting at RSN has now been idle long enough to be archived. Similarly to the previous posting on that noticeboard, there was a small response; with only
2590:
Neither blog posts nor reddit are reliable sources. But the other sources in that paragraph aren't great either, and removal would be the preferred option. -
5293:
5283:
2215:
554:
515:
447:
4301:"A type of character" refers to live action as well. I do not see where it implies "only" anime but understand you also mean a type of person but also note
4006:
your adding it back in October. If you feel your sources are now unreliable, I'm happy to just stick with the clearly-reliable and supportive GLAAD source.
2652:
The news sources are as much of a reliable source as the rest of the articles listed here. You had a problem with a blog post well these isn't a blog post.
5253:
729:
41:. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them.
4743:
devices, cunning ruses, horse carts, baggage, mouths) are relevant. Nor, if there's another definition somewhere in the above, what the distinction is. -
5318:
5248:
1187:
1177:
1048:
485:
368:
3164:
about sources so much I recommend looking at the reliability of a French vice article as my sources match or beat the reliability set by that source.
3818:
dresses as girl" is distressingly close to how transphobes view transwomen, and there's real-world violence associated with that (see, for example,
5313:
5238:
5118:
4366:"the slang" What slang do you mean? The word "trap"? Because that one is already in there. I don't really understand what you want to "compromise"
3840:
makes no mention of the word "trap." I do not understand how you are connecting this to a significant degree related to the article or outside of
360:
152:
1848:
and merge this in there, and I think simply changing the title of this article to that, without changing the content, would be a definite no-no.)
4507:? I believe not. If it were we would be able to find multiple sources linking the terms. It's been months, and we can't. It shouldn't be here.
2913:
I would not consider a one paragraph French vice article by "vice staff" to be a "more likely considered reliable" source that is supported by
776:
309:
28:
5003:– both the trap usage and some people considering it offensive – but asking for references about the "side" one doesn't agree with ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
1978:
1035:
996:
398:
391:
5174:
4648:
the other source. You have not gave a solid stance yet. How about this source which shows another example of 男の娘 being translated to trap?
3780:
else (or the viewer, for a fictional character) into thinking their gender is something it's not. I fail to see how this could be anything
1687:
1153:
653:
643:
620:
3143:. It doesn't mention "trap" or "English-speaking anime and manga fans", and therefore doesn't directly support the proposed article text:
5263:
2014:, but they are appropriate illustrations for the subject of the article (cross-dressing). I wouldn't object to moving the images into a
801:
5147:
1234:
Goodnight. I did not understand a little, it is possible that this is some kind of misunderstanding. She is quite authoritative on the
5243:
3993:
3951:
3866:
3677:
3608:
3522:
2772:
872:
464:
418:
405:
148:
138:
101:
4785:. That's pretty clear considering how they use "trapping" which is not slang. Still waiting for that quote that supports your claim.
1478:
me if you want me to help), and in that order, the current revision should be kept just to avoid messing it even more, regardless of
4452:
including it with the compromise that the slang definition is also included. So do you disagree with adding the definition back in?
3236:
790:
3553:? I can keep going. You've been championing the inclusion of a slur in this article, and it's appropriate that we call it as such.
2220:
might be a good starting point as a reference. Unfortunately, I won't be very useful for identifying Japanese-language sources. —
1976:
4060:
Also I think the "a term defined…" feels kinda off there, but I guess helps to have it there to contrast it with the pejorative?
4047:
3997:
3955:
3870:
3681:
3612:
3526:
2540:
other colloquial words like "fooling" and "deceiving" not the slang for otokonokos. It is not significantly related to otokonoko.
2181:
250:
242:
3784:
offensive, especially noting that violence has been committed in the real world over this, and media doesn't exist in a vacuum.
1790:
for other articles with this word in their title, and the only one that currently seems to have an English Knowledge article is
3075:
2499:
1803:
1144:
1105:
837:
473:
44:
32:
1833:
article and the other hypothetical articles merits a disambig page, but certainly the previous title of this article violated
4043:
2467:
2418:
2355:
2283:
2159:
2111:
2054:
2000:
1859:
1919:
If it's unclear what the majority of English-language readers are looking for, then there could be a disambiguation page at
4863:
to be defamatory. It is the use of the term for gender non-conforming persons which is described as defamatory. Describing
4728:
Do you see how there's no mention of otokonoko? Do you think GLAAD is referring to the formal or slang definition of trap?
4306:
reference I say either re-add the slang definition or remove the GLAAD comment as Kroon 2010 is at least equality related.
1841:
as a redirect to different title ("disambiguated" parenthetically or otherwise) would be preferable to the previous title.
913:
4779:/ "a dangerous or unpleasant situation which you have gotten into and from which it is difficult or impossible to escape"
2454:
is practically meaningless. The only people for whom this would not be the case are Chinese-speakers who don't know what
3361:
The first source Nozawa Shunsuke does mention it. "otokonoko in the subculture (‘traps’)." It what links the two terms.
2451:
Important to clarify that while Otokonoko (男の子) means "boy", the Otokonoko slang and cultural identity (男の娘) does *not*.
1702:
1662:
1618:
1572:
1558:
1526:
1508:
1487:
1399:
1358:
1336:
1300:
1247:
879:
722:
76:
5107:
3550:
1047:, and related topics on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
3141:男の娘: Noun; 1. young man who has a feminine aesthetic; Slang; Other forms: 男の娘 【おとこのむすめ】、おとこの娘 【おとこのこ】、おとこの娘 【おとこのむすめ】
3049:
765:
254:
246:
230:
191:
4324:, where it's talking about the people, not the character they're cosplaying as. And nonetheless it doesn't fit there.
4233:, which whilst being a much better, peer reviewed source, is nothing but a parantheses mention for what we're citing.
2526:
As much as I find the term distasteful, it definitely is related to this topic and would be expected to be discussed
1795:
2992:. But, even if this were a translation, we can't take a single instance and extrapolate a generalisation from it. -
1844:(As an aside, I don't have the time/inclination at the moment to create a new article with the much-better title of
2757:
about transgender persons. I do not know of this anime or LGBTQ wiki but it doesn't sound like a reliable source.
2409:
in gender studies literature, so there must be a large volume of work published by university presses out there...
2209:
2200:
1928:
1897:
1893:
1886:
1736:
1717:
5103:
4695:
Not quite sure what is meant by "formal" vs "slang" here. Do we have a source which describes this distinction? -
5062:
5040:
5012:
4934:
4378:
4337:
4292:
4248:
4204:
4155:
4110:
4069:
3808:
3770:
3341:
The first source, by Nozawa Shunsuke, does not directly support the content for which it is used as a reference.
854:
3173:
4566:
4544:
4320:"Character" here refers to "a person portrayed in an artistic piece". This doesn't make sense with for example
2619:
2580:
868:
751:
423:
5178:
5050:
Apparently he was banned from both editing the article and its talk page, so I'll go ahead and revert it back.
4191:
I also wonder what other editors think, but I think the reliability is probably something better discussed at
64:
2196:
2019:
1845:
3271:
Sneaky, you have no reliable sources linking otokonoko to "trap". Why are you so insistent on having it in?
3132:
2795:
2747:
2683:
2565:
2294:
1936:
1830:
1791:
1698:
1658:
1648:
1633:
1614:
1603:
1568:
1554:
1504:
1467:
1395:
1354:
1332:
1296:
1260:
1243:
945:
50:
4867:
as "a dangerous or unpleasant situation which you have gotten into" or ""something by which one is caught"
3028:. Rightly or wrongly, the content has has been challenged, and so needs a reliable source. The question of
1811:
5220:
4949:
4915:
4886:
4790:
4777:
4758:
4733:
4710:
4686:
4656:
4623:
4579:
4535:
4527:
4489:
4457:
4397:
4355:
4311:
4267:
4219:
4177:
4129:
4026:
3989:
3976:
3947:
3934:
3901:
3862:
3849:
3673:
3660:
3604:
3591:
3518:
3505:
3458:
3374:
3331:
3290:
3262:
3229:
3206:
3114:
3092:
2922:
2768:
2725:
2699:
2657:
2633:
2605:
2545:
2517:
2185:
1822:
1728:
1522:
1483:
1027:
546:
2615:
2576:
4523:
4169:
3128:
3011:
2791:
2743:
2679:
2561:
2437:
920:
648:
82:
4283:
Sorry if my wording was misleading, I meant 2D as in anime/manga etc., as opposed to real-life people.
1794:, but others that may have articles eventually (currently have articles on Japanese Knowledge) include
4258:
people. One reason I give the definition is to clear up any incorrect connections/implications. Also,
3136:
2709:
The sourcing is still terrible. Listicles are not reliable sources. Blogs are not reliable sources. -
2433:
5192:
4671:
4638:
4607:
4556:
4512:
4471:
4441:
4085:
4011:
3886:
3827:
3789:
3629:
3568:
3486:
3276:
2760:
2329:
2230:
2032:
1958:
1765:
826:
455:
540:
530:
509:
5126:
4143:
3844:. You have not showed a reliable source to claim that trap the slang term is in general offensive.
3837:
3819:
3150:
But, I'm happy to post something on WP:RSN. Or to start an RfC. And will do one or both shortly. -
3069:
2493:
899:
893:
258:
3624:, as you've already been blocked once for edit warring and I'm sure you'd rather not repeat that.
3145:
Otokonoko characters are commonly referred to by English-speaking anime and manga fans as "traps".
2204:
1152:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
562:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
4039:
2531:
2464:
2415:
2352:
2280:
2156:
2128:
because there is no other page with this title, and a disambiguation is therefore not necessary.
2108:
2051:
1997:
1987:
1856:
431:
4871:
what GLAAD considers offensive. Describing dangerous or unpleasant situations as such is not. -
4859:
I don't think GLAAD considers calling "a device used for capture" (e.g. mousetrap, bear trap) a
3170:
2819:
4484:
Now back to the question. Re-adding the definition if we are to keep the off topic disclaimer.
3127:
That might be surmountable if it can be shown to have a reputation for accuracy or significant
5204:
5024:
4945:
4911:
4882:
4786:
4780:
4754:
4729:
4706:
4682:
4652:
4619:
4575:
4531:
4485:
4453:
4393:
4351:
4307:
4263:
4215:
4189:
Feel free to change it back if you really don't trust it, but please keep it at the beginning.
4173:
4125:
4022:
3985:
3972:
3943:
3930:
3897:
3858:
3845:
3669:
3656:
3600:
3587:
3514:
3501:
3454:
3370:
3327:
3286:
3258:
3233:
3202:
3110:
3088:
3025:
2918:
2784:
2764:
2736:
2721:
2695:
2653:
2629:
2601:
2541:
2513:
2308:
1834:
1644:
1629:
1599:
1208:
1120:
1099:
815:
740:
38:
4098:
3222:
Hello again. Here again. With another source...again. Do you have any problem with this one?
5162:
4364:
You're bending words here, you don't just call people "characters", even if they're artists.
3413:
3326:
I have added a different version of "trap" with sources that should be considered reliable.
3007:
2917:
and my sources to be a too unreliable source to support the statements they are cited for.
2874:
and should be removed. Not only are they listicles, but the publications are group blogs. -
2372:
2015:
1740:
864:
848:
5188:
4881:"fooling" or "trapping" others..." It is not speaking for otokonokos or any other groups.
4667:
4634:
4603:
4552:
4508:
4504:
4467:
4437:
4081:
4007:
3882:
3823:
3785:
3625:
3564:
3482:
3435:
3364:
3272:
3226:
A/V A to Z: An Encyclopedic Dictionary of Media, Entertainment and Other Audiovisual Terms
2530:. The currently cited source is completely unusable on WP, though, as an anonymous blog.--
2322:
2243:
2223:
2095:
2025:
1951:
1780:
1758:
1368:
934:
559:
4481:
4279:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Otokonoko&diff=1038732632&oldid=1038437902
2192:
recommends setting pictures next to the relevant text, but it's just an interim measure.
1598:
it's unclear just how much is actually salvageable (though section 4's content is true).
147:-related issues on Knowledge. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
1683:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
206:
185:
5122:
5000:
4570:
4548:
3542:
3497:
3473:
3061:
3021:
3003:
2485:
2376:
2249:
2131:
2099:
1538:
1415:
1374:
1312:
1276:
1136:
906:
709:
351:
4281:, but it seems like it wasn't good enough, maybe you can think of something better? :s
3546:
5232:
5058:
5036:
5008:
4930:
4374:
4333:
4288:
4244:
4200:
4192:
4165:
4151:
4139:
4120:
4106:
4065:
4035:
3841:
3804:
3766:
3722:
Defamatory: "deceptive," "fooling," "pretending," "posing," "trap," or "masquerading"
3185:
3160:
3033:
3029:
2935:
is not my own view on the source, it's my view on the likely consensus of editors. -
2459:
2410:
2347:
2275:
2151:
2121:
2103:
2046:
1992:
1945:
1851:
1724:
1270:
859:
635:
614:
3879:"Boy who dresses as girl" is distressingly close to how transphobes view transwomen
3398:
2914:
2901:
2269:
2189:
1905:
1479:
1456:
1409:
1392:
1345:
In particular, the Japanese wiki directly gives a link to otokonoko in the article
1265:
the problem is that even if we accept this source as reliable, it does not support
1235:
262:
222:
129:
4783:
3139:
But again, that might not matter, because the definition from JMdict is (in full)
2199:. We only need a short paragraph to serve as a lead section, and then the current
5142:
child in question is slightly feminine) does not change the meaning of the word.
3188:
and my edit comment. Let it stay up so they don't have to dig through the edits.
3169:
Referred to WP:RSN, with specific mention of the Jisho/JMdict & Vice sources.
1214:
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
5158:
3968:
3402:
2069:
aspects of "cross-dressing in Japan", "cosplay" &/or "anime/manga". I think
5157:
Whatever is to be done in the article will require reliable secondary sources.
4824:
2075:
refers to Boy first and foremost, while the cross-dressing is a secondary topic
1450:
113:
95:
4901:
4872:
4768:
4744:
4720:
4696:
3734:
3710:
3444:
3443:
source, and, absent objections, I intend to remove it in the next few days. -
3394:
3384:
3353:
3313:
3300:
3248:
3193:
3176:
3151:
3124:
Jisho.org is an amateur website; a "labor of love" for Kim, Miwa & Andrew.
3053:
3045:
3037:
2993:
2936:
2905:
2888:
2875:
2710:
2644:
2591:
2392:
2078:
1130:
1126:
1021:
1017:
1011:
990:
951:
536:
212:
119:
2883:
How is group blog much different from the other sources listed in this page?
2316:
1353:
mentions this same novel novel as an example of similar characters in games.
2125:
1920:
1901:
1838:
1752:
1732:
1713:
1149:
3172:
Previous postings there included all currently used & proposed sources.
53:
when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
3369:
Please repeat your opinion so we are not deadlocked in an edit war again.
3312:
For what article content is it proposed that this source would be used? -
3006:, while the issue of whether it is offensive would require additional RS.
5054:
5032:
5004:
4926:
4370:
4329:
4284:
4240:
4196:
4147:
4102:
4061:
3800:
3762:
2838:
1328:
2856:
3735:"Is the word 'Trap' Transphobic? | Transgender Library and Information"
3002:
I think that the fact that "trap" is used to refer to crossdressers is
2989:
1408:
We seem to be talking past each other. I'll ask for a third opinion at
1239:
1218:
4326:
Don't have a reference for what? For the definition not fitting there?
3201:
They're as poorly sourced as the rest of the sources. It is relevant.
3048:, the result of that broader question will dictate whether it goes in
5053:
Although I still think we could do better with that GLAAD reference.
2303:
4569:
is in agreement with you since the GLAAD doesn't mention otokonoko.
3761:
said, it also seems to say nothing about its usage in this context.
2077:, albeit unintentionally, significantly undersells the disparity. -
2010:
I'm not sure. The images would surprise someone who is looking for
4828:
A "defamatory" spring mousetrap by Victor (with apologies to EEng)
4823:
4146:
might be an option, although I do think it shouldn't be used here.
3057:
2973:
2897:
examples of such words in use and blogs like "japanesewithanime?"
1044:
1040:
236:
144:
143:, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
2195:
The next step could be to expand this article into an article on
5223:
5196:
5182:
5166:
5151:
5130:
5111:
5066:
5044:
5016:
4953:
4938:
4919:
4904:
4890:
4875:
4794:
4771:
4762:
4747:
4737:
4723:
4714:
4699:
4690:
4675:
4660:
4642:
4627:
4611:
4583:
4560:
4539:
4516:
4493:
4475:
4461:
4445:
4401:
4382:
4359:
4341:
4315:
4296:
4271:
4252:
4223:
4208:
4181:
4159:
4133:
4114:
4089:
4073:
4030:
4015:
3980:
3938:
3905:
3890:
3853:
3831:
3812:
3793:
3774:
3664:
3633:
3595:
3572:
3509:
3490:
3462:
3447:
3417:
3387:
3378:
3356:
3335:
3316:
3303:
3294:
3280:
3266:
3251:
3210:
3196:
3179:
3154:
3118:
3106:
3096:
3081:
3040:
3015:
2996:
2939:
2926:
2908:
2891:
2878:
2799:
2776:
2751:
2729:
2713:
2703:
2687:
2661:
2647:
2637:
2623:
2609:
2594:
2584:
2569:
2549:
2534:
2521:
2505:
2472:
2441:
2423:
2395:
2360:
2336:
2288:
2258:
2237:
2164:
2140:
2116:
2081:
2059:
2039:
2005:
1965:
1864:
1772:
1747:. Are you planning on creating an article on another meaning of
1706:
1679:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
1666:
1652:
1637:
1622:
1607:
1576:
1562:
1547:
1530:
1512:
1491:
1474:. If no editing is done to clarify all of it and in that order (
1424:
1403:
1383:
1362:
1340:
1321:
1304:
1285:
1251:
4649:
4551:"trap" into the article for reasons you have yet to set forth.
2011:
1924:
1913:
1882:
1874:
1367:
What you're attempting is original research by synthesis, see
1203:
58:
15:
1466:
suggested paragraph has to be readable (that falls purely on
3541:
don't think it's a slur, as you think it doesn't fall under
2839:"19 Best Anime Trap Series That Aren't Hentai - Cinemaholic"
2824:
Japanese kawaii idol music culture news | Tokyo Girls Update
1892:
If the majority of English-language readers are looking for
350:
4944:
what crossdressers are offended by in the sectioned cited.
1869:
I think I understand your point, in that the Japanese word
5031:
As it is the extra definition there is deceiving at best.
4099:
https://repositorio.ulima.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12724/12188
3971:
term when it is used to characterize transgender people."
3125:
2391:, but we should see if there are any scholarly sources. -
2383:
gives a good overview, better than what would be found in
3024:
is a nice essay; but there is, of course, a counterview,
1346:
478:
3052:
or not. If it's just a general cultural phenom as with
1739:, because the subject of this article appears to be the
1292:
1238:
and is used in most articles about works in this genre.
4782:/"something by which one is caught or stopped unawares"
4753:"something by which one is caught or stopped unawares"
4278:
2931:
To be fair, it's one paragraph and a six minute video.
1266:
344:
339:
334:
329:
270:
4482:
https://www.gamespark.jp/article/2019/03/30/88579.html
4999:
However I do feel like most of this is talking about
2341:
I guess... I'm naturally somewhat reluctant to trust
2124:, I also think that the page should be moved back to
1814:(with only the last one being tagged for notability).
2820:"Japanese Fans Rank Top 5 Anime Traps, "Otokonoko"!"
1148:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1039:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
558:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
451:: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
234:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
3836:"Boy who dresses as girl" so otokonoko itself? The
3401:; the source doesn't directly support the claim.) —
2018:below the article text as an interim measure until
1944:
Do either of these options sound reasonable to you?
4262:refers to the 2D as they're talking about videos.
3481:that it's not a nice term and move on from there?
3472:I would've thought that "trap" being offensive is
2086:Well, yeah. It should probably also be noted that
1517:Frankly? I have no idea what this sentence means:
4058:free to change it back if you think it's worse ^^
3159:It is highly ranked. If you are going to post to
887:Knowledge requested photographs of gender studies
257:. Current time in Japan: 17:19, October 2, 2024 (
249:, where you can join the project, participate in
5073:Page title and search description is misleading.
2988:and an aesthetic use of Latin script. See also:
2203:article can be merged in as the second section.
1393:https://myanimelist.net/manga/9542/Mei_no_Naisho
1350:
5274:Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
3060:then the 2/3rds part should be de-emphasized.
1800:Megane no Otokonoko / Nippon no DNA / Go Waist
1693:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
4767:Hrm... so what is GLAAD referring to then? -
8:
572:Knowledge:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
5279:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
5269:Start-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
4900:crossdressing, rather than transgender). -
3711:"GLAAD Media Reference Guide - Transgender"
2458:means but can read the Chinese characters.
575:Template:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
62:
1094:
985:
734:Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
717:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
695:
609:
504:
317:
180:
90:
4195:considering how the last section went ^^
3087:describe a Japanese phenomenon in media.
1881:, are they more likely to be looking for
964:Gender studies articles needing attention
809:Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
5304:Low-importance anime and manga articles
5144:2403:4800:8477:4D01:813F:7A2D:E699:CDD4
3702:
2966:
2815:The following are not reliable sources:
1096:
987:
611:
506:
271:
182:
92:
5289:Low-importance Gender studies articles
3878:
3144:
3140:
2932:
2484:here before making any further edits.
2449:
2312:
2246:, that sounds like a good idea to me.
2186:rearranged the pictures into a gallery
2070:
1518:
5309:All WikiProject Anime and manga pages
5259:Low-importance Japan-related articles
1829:I'm not sure if the existence of the
1470:); and third, this discussion itself
1257:Copying the above from my talk page.
1057:Knowledge:WikiProject Anime and manga
7:
5299:Start-Class anime and manga articles
3109:here it gives 男の娘 as a translation.
2837:Bhattacharya, Anirban (2021-01-03).
2188:. The gallery is not ideal, because
1219:https://konomanga.jp/special/31493-2
1142:This article is within the scope of
1060:Template:WikiProject Anime and manga
1033:This article is within the scope of
662:Knowledge:WikiProject Gender studies
552:This article is within the scope of
228:This article is within the scope of
5294:WikiProject Gender studies articles
5284:Start-Class Gender studies articles
2295:"What Is Japan's Fetish This Week?
1751:that would be disambiguated at the
665:Template:WikiProject Gender studies
241:on Knowledge. If you would like to
81:It is of interest to the following
5254:Start-Class Japan-related articles
4719:I'm not seeing the distinction. -
1931:, and other articles that contain
730:Unassessed Gender studies articles
555:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
161:Knowledge:WikiProject LGBT studies
14:
5319:Low-importance sociology articles
5249:WikiProject LGBT studies articles
2146:aware of the standard meaning of
873:Women's education in Saudi Arabia
164:Template:WikiProject LGBT studies
2857:"26 Best Anime Traps Characters"
2307:(cited in the article) work for
2205:"Japan’s gender-bending history"
1982:) using it to mean "boy", while
1449:
1351:Japanese article about otokonoko
1207:
1129:
1119:
1098:
1020:
1010:
989:
708:
634:
613:
539:
529:
508:
215:
205:
184:
122:
112:
94:
63:
19:
2984:There's a difference between a
2974:https://i.imgur.com/l0oCIBz.png
2933:More likely considered reliable
1808:Toshishita no Otokonoko (album)
1182:This article has been rated as
1162:Knowledge:WikiProject Sociology
1077:This article has been rated as
682:This article has been rated as
592:This article has been rated as
578:Sexology and sexuality articles
304:This article has been rated as
135:This article is of interest to
43:Content must be written from a
27:The subject of this article is
5314:Start-Class sociology articles
5239:Knowledge controversial topics
2887:seems most likely reliable. -
2270:neither caption cites a source
1535:I don't understand it either.
1165:Template:WikiProject Sociology
1:
5203:この言葉がネット用語だ。意味がふたつ訳、別のページがある
5119:Knowledge is not a dictionary
5067:10:03, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
4021:preferable course of action.
3107:https://jisho.org/search/trap
2570:19:05, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
2473:06:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
2442:22:01, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
1156:and see a list of open tasks.
1051:and see a list of open tasks.
566:and see a list of open tasks.
321:WikiProject Japan to do list:
4650:https://nikkan-spa.jp/104794
2550:01:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
2535:09:12, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
2522:04:15, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
2506:18:29, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
1563:20:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
1548:07:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
1531:22:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
1513:11:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
1492:12:40, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
1425:13:47, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
1404:23:49, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
1384:22:46, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
1363:11:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
1341:11:42, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
1322:11:10, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
1305:20:49, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
1286:20:33, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
1252:18:06, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
5045:19:19, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
5017:04:04, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
4954:04:56, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
4939:04:04, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
4920:02:40, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
4905:02:19, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
4891:02:01, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
4876:01:54, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
4795:01:26, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
4772:01:08, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
4763:01:07, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
4748:00:51, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
4738:00:25, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
4724:00:22, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
4715:00:14, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
4700:23:49, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
4691:23:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
4676:22:50, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
4661:22:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
4643:21:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
4628:21:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
4612:21:26, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
4584:21:18, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
4561:21:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
4540:18:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
4517:18:18, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
4494:16:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
4476:16:27, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
4462:15:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
4446:15:08, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
4402:03:27, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
4383:02:12, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
4360:21:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
4342:14:38, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
4316:01:18, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
4297:23:45, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
4272:17:56, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
4253:15:56, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
4224:14:12, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
4209:23:57, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
4182:16:18, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
4160:10:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
4134:07:45, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
4115:23:34, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
4090:15:17, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
4074:11:04, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
4031:11:03, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
4016:19:19, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
3981:17:34, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
3939:22:17, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
3906:15:49, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
3891:14:56, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
3854:23:31, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
3832:22:46, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
3813:22:04, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
3794:21:41, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
3775:20:47, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
3665:18:08, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
3634:14:34, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
3596:05:41, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
3573:03:40, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
3510:00:37, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
3491:03:40, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
3463:00:35, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
3352:not mention "Otokonoko". -
3050:Glossary of anime and manga
2424:10:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
2396:09:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
2361:10:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
2337:09:42, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
2289:09:28, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
2259:09:14, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
2238:09:11, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
2165:09:28, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
2141:08:54, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
2117:06:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
2082:04:05, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
2060:04:03, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
2040:03:30, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
2006:03:15, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
1966:02:41, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
1865:02:01, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
1773:01:33, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
1593:Translation request details
1036:WikiProject Anime and manga
443:to articles that need them.
382:Featured content candidates
284:Knowledge:WikiProject Japan
37:When updating the article,
5335:
5264:WikiProject Japan articles
5131:13:56, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
5112:11:44, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
4138:(I think you meant to say
3448:07:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
3418:14:01, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
3388:00:32, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
3379:00:29, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
3357:00:19, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
3336:00:10, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
3317:00:19, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
3304:00:19, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
3295:22:41, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
3281:22:26, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
3267:21:26, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
3252:11:18, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
3224:Kroon, Richard W. (2010).
3211:04:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
3197:07:44, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
3180:11:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
3135:, in the same way as IMDB.
2730:16:51, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
2714:09:49, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
2704:08:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
2688:05:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
2662:18:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
2648:00:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
2638:21:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
2624:22:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
2610:15:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
2201:Otokonoko (cross-dressing)
1929:Otokonoko (cross-dressing)
1898:Otokonoko (cross-dressing)
1896:, then I would argue that
1894:Otokonoko (cross-dressing)
1887:Otokonoko (cross-dressing)
1737:Otokonoko (cross-dressing)
1718:Otokonoko (cross-dressing)
1667:02:20, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
1653:01:04, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
1638:23:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
1577:02:28, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
1188:project's importance scale
1083:project's importance scale
688:project's importance scale
644:WikiProject Gender studies
598:project's importance scale
377:
310:project's importance scale
287:Template:WikiProject Japan
5244:Start-Class LGBT articles
5224:16:20, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
5197:15:48, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
5183:15:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
5167:01:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
5152:01:39, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
3496:It is most certainly not
3247:it be used to support? -
3155:02:24, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
3119:22:27, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
2595:23:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
2585:01:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
1916:in the Japanese language.
1707:11:37, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
1623:10:47, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
1608:02:23, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
1181:
1114:
1076:
1005:
855:Brannon Masculinity Scale
694:
681:
629:
591:
524:
316:
303:
200:
107:
89:
39:be bold, but not reckless
4164:Yes, my bad. I did mean
3097:01:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
1912:most commonly refers to
1900:should be moved back to
1727:, I'm a bit confused by
1349:as a related topic, and
1063:anime and manga articles
869:Michael Kaufman (author)
641:This article is part of
419:Good article nominations
139:WikiProject LGBT studies
5104:Jessie with extra words
4389:Nozawa, Shunsuke (2012)
4387:I'm not bending words.
4347:Nozawa, Shunsuke (2012)
4322:Nozawa, Shunsuke (2012)
4303:Nozawa, Shunsuke (2012)
4260:Nozawa, Shunsuke (2012)
4237:Nozawa, Shunsuke (2012)
4231:Nozawa, Shunsuke (2012)
3230:McFarland & Company
3082:00:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
3041:00:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
3016:19:38, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
2997:00:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
2940:00:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
2927:16:23, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
2909:02:22, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
2892:23:57, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
2879:23:30, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
2800:22:54, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
2777:21:05, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
2752:20:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
2197:Cross-dressing in Japan
2020:Cross-dressing in Japan
1937:Toshishita no Otokonoko
1935:in the name (including
1846:Cross-dressing in Japan
1831:Toshishita no Otokonoko
1792:Toshishita no Otokonoko
1331:makes it imouto-title?
668:Gender studies articles
4829:
4239:is talking about 3D).
2404:skeptical about using
2022:becomes an article. —
1788:a quick ja.wiki search
1028:Anime and manga portal
569:Sexology and sexuality
547:Human sexuality portal
516:Sexology and sexuality
355:
290:Japan-related articles
71:This article is rated
31:and content may be in
4827:
4436:weight into account.
4048:few or no other edits
3998:few or no other edits
3956:few or no other edits
3871:few or no other edits
3682:few or no other edits
3613:few or no other edits
3527:few or no other edits
2958:translate otherwise.
1806:("Boys and Girls"?),
1804:Otokonoko to Onnanoko
1457:third opinion request
1293:https://vndb.org/g421
1145:WikiProject Sociology
784:/Sexuality and gender
656:for more information.
354:
151:or contribute to the
45:neutral point of view
4050:outside this topic.
4000:outside this topic.
3958:outside this topic.
3873:outside this topic.
3684:outside this topic.
3615:outside this topic.
3529:outside this topic.
914:Gender studies stubs
477:an article from the
459:Japan-related stubs.
251:relevant discussions
5137:This topic is wrong
3838:Trans panic defense
3820:Trans panic defense
1688:結佳梨Yukari JK 14.jpg
900:History of feminism
489:unassessed articles
255:lists of open tasks
245:, please visit the
4830:
3066:
2900:The criteria from
2490:
1798:("Boys, Girls"?),
1796:Otokonoko Onnanoko
1699:Community Tech bot
1659:Solaire the knight
1615:Solaire the knight
1569:Solaire the knight
1555:Solaire the knight
1505:Solaire the knight
1472:has to be readable
1468:Solaire the knight
1396:Solaire the knight
1355:Solaire the knight
1333:Solaire the knight
1297:Solaire the knight
1261:Solaire the knight
1244:Solaire the knight
1168:sociology articles
479:Japanese Knowledge
465:requested articles
456:Improve and expand
448:Pages for Deletion
432:Godzilla Minus One
356:
77:content assessment
4567:WP:INDISCRIMINATE
4545:WP:INDISCRIMINATE
4051:
4001:
3959:
3874:
3685:
3616:
3530:
3399:original research
3062:
2763:comment added by
2486:
2470:
2421:
2358:
2334:
2315:hashtag on their
2309:Yakkun Sakurazuka
2286:
2257:
2235:
2162:
2139:
2114:
2090:doesn't actually
2057:
2037:
2003:
1963:
1862:
1837:, so even having
1826:word of Japanese.
1770:
1546:
1497:
1496:
1423:
1382:
1320:
1284:
1227:
1226:
1202:
1201:
1198:
1197:
1194:
1193:
1093:
1092:
1089:
1088:
984:
983:
980:
979:
976:
975:
972:
971:
608:
607:
604:
603:
503:
502:
499:
498:
495:
494:
414:
413:
278:
239:-related articles
231:WikiProject Japan
179:
178:
175:
174:
57:
56:
5326:
5217:
5214:
5211:
5208:
5028:
4033:
3983:
3941:
3877:What I said was
3856:
3749:
3748:
3742:
3741:
3731:
3725:
3724:
3719:
3717:
3707:
3667:
3598:
3512:
3368:
3242:
3078:
3072:
3065:
2976:
2971:
2871:
2869:
2868:
2852:
2850:
2849:
2833:
2831:
2830:
2788:
2779:
2740:
2502:
2496:
2489:
2463:
2414:
2381:The Conversation
2373:Takarazuka Revue
2351:
2332:
2328:
2325:
2317:Facebook profile
2279:
2256:
2254:
2247:
2233:
2229:
2226:
2219:
2210:The Conversation
2155:
2138:
2136:
2129:
2107:
2050:
2035:
2031:
2028:
1996:
1961:
1957:
1954:
1908:explaining that
1855:
1812:Otokonoko Bokujō
1784:
1768:
1764:
1761:
1545:
1543:
1536:
1482:considerations.
1477:
1453:
1446:
1445:
1422:
1420:
1413:
1381:
1379:
1372:
1319:
1317:
1310:
1283:
1281:
1274:
1264:
1211:
1204:
1170:
1169:
1166:
1163:
1160:
1139:
1134:
1133:
1123:
1116:
1115:
1110:
1102:
1095:
1065:
1064:
1061:
1058:
1055:
1030:
1025:
1024:
1014:
1007:
1006:
1001:
993:
986:
865:Media and gender
777:Deletion sorting
712:
705:
704:
696:
670:
669:
666:
663:
660:
638:
631:
630:
625:
617:
610:
580:
579:
576:
573:
570:
549:
544:
543:
533:
526:
525:
520:
512:
505:
440:requested images
376:
375:
318:
292:
291:
288:
285:
282:
275:
273:
266:
225:
220:
219:
218:
209:
202:
201:
196:
188:
181:
169:
168:
165:
162:
159:
132:
127:
126:
125:
116:
109:
108:
98:
91:
74:
68:
67:
59:
23:
22:
16:
5334:
5333:
5329:
5328:
5327:
5325:
5324:
5323:
5229:
5228:
5215:
5212:
5209:
5206:
5139:
5075:
5022:
4633:you not agree?
4528:WP:NODISCLAIMER
3757:To add to what
3754:
3753:
3752:
3739:
3737:
3733:
3732:
3728:
3715:
3713:
3709:
3708:
3704:
3470:
3432:
3430:arbitrary break
3410:
3406:
3362:
3239:
3223:
3076:
3070:
3063:
2981:
2980:
2979:
2972:
2968:
2866:
2864:
2855:
2847:
2845:
2843:The Cinemaholic
2836:
2828:
2826:
2818:
2782:
2758:
2734:
2500:
2494:
2487:
2481:
2406:The Japan Times
2379:. The piece in
2330:
2323:
2250:
2248:
2231:
2224:
2213:
2182:added a hatnote
2132:
2130:
2096:Miyuki Nakajima
2033:
2026:
1959:
1952:
1923:that points to
1778:
1766:
1759:
1721:
1712:Page move from
1695:nomination page
1681:
1595:
1539:
1537:
1523:François Robere
1484:François Robere
1475:
1416:
1414:
1375:
1373:
1313:
1311:
1277:
1275:
1258:
1232:
1167:
1164:
1161:
1158:
1157:
1135:
1128:
1108:
1062:
1059:
1056:
1054:Anime and manga
1053:
1052:
1026:
1019:
999:
997:Anime and manga
968:
958:Needs attention
667:
664:
661:
658:
657:
623:
577:
574:
571:
568:
567:
560:human sexuality
545:
538:
518:
349:
289:
286:
283:
280:
279:
269:
221:
216:
214:
194:
166:
163:
160:
157:
156:
128:
123:
121:
75:on Knowledge's
72:
20:
12:
11:
5:
5332:
5330:
5322:
5321:
5316:
5311:
5306:
5301:
5296:
5291:
5286:
5281:
5276:
5271:
5266:
5261:
5256:
5251:
5246:
5241:
5231:
5230:
5227:
5226:
5201:
5200:
5199:
5175:60.146.115.172
5170:
5169:
5138:
5135:
5134:
5133:
5074:
5071:
5070:
5069:
5051:
5030:
5020:
5019:
4998:
4993:
4992:
4991:
4990:
4989:
4988:
4987:
4986:
4985:
4984:
4983:
4982:
4981:
4980:
4979:
4978:
4977:
4976:
4975:
4974:
4973:
4972:
4971:
4970:
4969:
4968:
4967:
4966:
4965:
4964:
4963:
4962:
4961:
4960:
4959:
4958:
4957:
4956:
4822:
4821:
4820:
4819:
4818:
4817:
4816:
4815:
4814:
4813:
4812:
4811:
4810:
4809:
4808:
4807:
4806:
4805:
4804:
4803:
4802:
4801:
4800:
4799:
4798:
4797:
4599:
4598:
4597:
4596:
4595:
4594:
4593:
4592:
4591:
4590:
4589:
4588:
4587:
4586:
4524:WP:NOTCENSORED
4433:
4432:
4431:
4430:
4429:
4428:
4427:
4426:
4425:
4424:
4423:
4422:
4421:
4420:
4419:
4418:
4417:
4416:
4415:
4414:
4413:
4412:
4411:
4410:
4409:
4408:
4407:
4406:
4405:
4404:
4367:
4365:
4327:
4325:
4282:
4234:
4190:
4188:
4170:WP:SCHOLARSHIP
4168:. Please read
4095:
4059:
4055:
4054:
4053:
4052:
3965:
3964:
3963:
3962:
3961:
3960:
3921:
3920:
3919:
3918:
3917:
3916:
3915:
3914:
3913:
3912:
3911:
3910:
3909:
3908:
3751:
3750:
3726:
3701:
3700:
3696:
3695:
3694:
3693:
3692:
3691:
3690:
3689:
3688:
3687:
3686:
3643:
3642:
3641:
3640:
3639:
3638:
3637:
3636:
3578:
3577:
3576:
3575:
3557:
3556:
3555:
3554:
3551:Anime Feminist
3532:
3531:
3469:
3466:
3431:
3428:
3427:
3426:
3425:
3424:
3423:
3422:
3421:
3420:
3408:
3404:
3324:
3323:
3322:
3321:
3320:
3319:
3310:
3309:
3308:
3307:
3306:
3237:
3220:
3219:
3218:
3217:
3216:
3215:
3214:
3213:
3167:
3166:
3165:
3149:
3138:
3133:user-generated
3102:
3101:
3100:
3099:
3084:
3000:
2999:
2978:
2977:
2965:
2964:
2960:
2955:
2954:
2953:
2952:
2951:
2950:
2949:
2948:
2947:
2946:
2945:
2944:
2943:
2942:
2872:
2861:My Otaku World
2853:
2834:
2816:
2813:
2812:
2811:
2810:
2809:
2808:
2807:
2806:
2805:
2707:
2706:
2675:
2674:
2673:
2672:
2671:
2670:
2669:
2668:
2667:
2666:
2665:
2664:
2616:Sumireko Usami
2577:Sumireko Usami
2557:
2556:
2555:
2554:
2553:
2552:
2528:to some degree
2480:
2477:
2476:
2475:
2429:
2428:
2427:
2426:
2377:Matsuko Deluxe
2369:
2368:
2367:
2366:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2297:Male Daughters
2273:
2265:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2174:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2170:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2071:Japanese word
2066:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2062:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1917:
1849:
1842:
1827:
1815:
1720:
1710:
1691:
1690:
1680:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1594:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1495:
1494:
1462:
1461:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1267:what you wrote
1231:
1228:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1215:
1212:
1200:
1199:
1196:
1195:
1192:
1191:
1184:Low-importance
1180:
1174:
1173:
1171:
1154:the discussion
1141:
1140:
1137:Society portal
1124:
1112:
1111:
1109:Low‑importance
1103:
1091:
1090:
1087:
1086:
1079:Low-importance
1075:
1069:
1068:
1066:
1049:the discussion
1032:
1031:
1015:
1003:
1002:
1000:Low‑importance
994:
982:
981:
978:
977:
974:
973:
970:
969:
967:
966:
954:
941:
930:
916:
902:
889:
875:
844:
833:
822:
811:
797:
786:
772:
761:
759:/Collaboration
747:
736:
716:
714:
713:
701:
700:
692:
691:
684:Low-importance
680:
674:
673:
671:
659:Gender studies
639:
627:
626:
624:Low‑importance
621:Gender studies
618:
606:
605:
602:
601:
594:Low-importance
590:
584:
583:
581:
564:the discussion
551:
550:
534:
522:
521:
519:Low‑importance
513:
501:
500:
497:
496:
493:
492:
491:
490:
482:
469:
460:
452:
444:
435:
412:
411:
403:
396:
387:
386:
385:
374:
373:
369:A-class review
365:
348:
347:
342:
337:
332:
326:
323:
322:
314:
313:
306:Low-importance
302:
296:
295:
293:
227:
226:
210:
198:
197:
195:Low‑importance
189:
177:
176:
173:
172:
170:
134:
133:
117:
105:
104:
99:
87:
86:
80:
69:
55:
54:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5331:
5320:
5317:
5315:
5312:
5310:
5307:
5305:
5302:
5300:
5297:
5295:
5292:
5290:
5287:
5285:
5282:
5280:
5277:
5275:
5272:
5270:
5267:
5265:
5262:
5260:
5257:
5255:
5252:
5250:
5247:
5245:
5242:
5240:
5237:
5236:
5234:
5225:
5222:
5219:
5218:
5202:
5198:
5194:
5190:
5186:
5185:
5184:
5180:
5176:
5172:
5171:
5168:
5164:
5160:
5156:
5155:
5154:
5153:
5149:
5145:
5136:
5132:
5128:
5124:
5120:
5116:
5115:
5114:
5113:
5109:
5105:
5099:
5095:
5091:
5087:
5083:
5079:
5072:
5068:
5064:
5060:
5056:
5052:
5049:
5048:
5047:
5046:
5042:
5038:
5034:
5026:
5018:
5014:
5010:
5006:
5002:
4995:
4994:
4955:
4951:
4947:
4942:
4941:
4940:
4936:
4932:
4928:
4923:
4922:
4921:
4917:
4913:
4908:
4907:
4906:
4903:
4898:
4894:
4893:
4892:
4888:
4884:
4879:
4878:
4877:
4874:
4870:
4866:
4862:
4858:
4857:
4856:
4855:
4854:
4853:
4852:
4851:
4850:
4849:
4848:
4847:
4846:
4845:
4844:
4843:
4842:
4841:
4840:
4839:
4838:
4837:
4836:
4835:
4834:
4833:
4832:
4831:
4826:
4796:
4792:
4788:
4784:
4781:
4778:
4775:
4774:
4773:
4770:
4766:
4765:
4764:
4760:
4756:
4751:
4750:
4749:
4746:
4741:
4740:
4739:
4735:
4731:
4727:
4726:
4725:
4722:
4718:
4717:
4716:
4712:
4708:
4703:
4702:
4701:
4698:
4694:
4693:
4692:
4688:
4684:
4679:
4678:
4677:
4673:
4669:
4664:
4663:
4662:
4658:
4654:
4651:
4646:
4645:
4644:
4640:
4636:
4631:
4630:
4629:
4625:
4621:
4616:
4615:
4614:
4613:
4609:
4605:
4585:
4581:
4577:
4572:
4568:
4564:
4563:
4562:
4558:
4554:
4550:
4546:
4543:
4542:
4541:
4537:
4533:
4529:
4525:
4520:
4519:
4518:
4514:
4510:
4506:
4501:
4497:
4496:
4495:
4491:
4487:
4483:
4479:
4478:
4477:
4473:
4469:
4465:
4464:
4463:
4459:
4455:
4450:
4449:
4448:
4447:
4443:
4439:
4403:
4399:
4395:
4390:
4386:
4385:
4384:
4380:
4376:
4372:
4363:
4362:
4361:
4357:
4353:
4348:
4345:
4344:
4343:
4339:
4335:
4331:
4323:
4319:
4318:
4317:
4313:
4309:
4304:
4300:
4299:
4298:
4294:
4290:
4286:
4280:
4275:
4274:
4273:
4269:
4265:
4261:
4256:
4255:
4254:
4250:
4246:
4242:
4238:
4232:
4227:
4226:
4225:
4221:
4217:
4212:
4211:
4210:
4206:
4202:
4198:
4194:
4185:
4184:
4183:
4179:
4175:
4171:
4167:
4163:
4162:
4161:
4157:
4153:
4149:
4145:
4141:
4137:
4136:
4135:
4131:
4127:
4122:
4118:
4117:
4116:
4112:
4108:
4104:
4100:
4093:
4092:
4091:
4087:
4083:
4078:
4077:
4076:
4075:
4071:
4067:
4063:
4049:
4045:
4041:
4037:
4032:
4028:
4024:
4019:
4018:
4017:
4013:
4009:
4004:
4003:
4002:
3999:
3995:
3991:
3987:
3982:
3978:
3974:
3970:
3957:
3953:
3949:
3945:
3940:
3936:
3932:
3927:
3926:
3925:
3924:
3923:
3922:
3907:
3903:
3899:
3894:
3893:
3892:
3888:
3884:
3880:
3876:
3875:
3872:
3868:
3864:
3860:
3855:
3851:
3847:
3843:
3839:
3835:
3834:
3833:
3829:
3825:
3821:
3816:
3815:
3814:
3810:
3806:
3802:
3797:
3796:
3795:
3791:
3787:
3783:
3778:
3777:
3776:
3772:
3768:
3764:
3760:
3756:
3755:
3747:
3736:
3730:
3727:
3723:
3712:
3706:
3703:
3699:
3683:
3679:
3675:
3671:
3666:
3662:
3658:
3653:
3652:
3651:
3650:
3649:
3648:
3647:
3646:
3645:
3644:
3635:
3631:
3627:
3623:
3618:
3617:
3614:
3610:
3606:
3602:
3597:
3593:
3589:
3584:
3583:
3582:
3581:
3580:
3579:
3574:
3570:
3566:
3561:
3560:
3559:
3558:
3552:
3548:
3544:
3540:
3536:
3535:
3534:
3533:
3528:
3524:
3520:
3516:
3511:
3507:
3503:
3499:
3495:
3494:
3493:
3492:
3488:
3484:
3479:
3475:
3467:
3465:
3464:
3460:
3456:
3450:
3449:
3446:
3442:
3437:
3429:
3419:
3415:
3411:
3400:
3396:
3391:
3390:
3389:
3386:
3382:
3381:
3380:
3376:
3372:
3366:
3360:
3359:
3358:
3355:
3351:
3347:
3344:
3340:
3339:
3338:
3337:
3333:
3329:
3318:
3315:
3311:
3305:
3302:
3298:
3297:
3296:
3292:
3288:
3284:
3283:
3282:
3278:
3274:
3270:
3269:
3268:
3264:
3260:
3255:
3254:
3253:
3250:
3245:
3244:
3243:
3240:
3238:9780786457403
3235:
3231:
3227:
3212:
3208:
3204:
3200:
3199:
3198:
3195:
3190:
3189:
3187:
3183:
3182:
3181:
3178:
3174:
3171:
3168:
3162:
3158:
3157:
3156:
3153:
3146:
3142:
3137:
3134:
3130:
3129:use by others
3126:
3123:
3122:
3121:
3120:
3116:
3112:
3108:
3098:
3094:
3090:
3085:
3083:
3079:
3073:
3067:
3059:
3055:
3051:
3047:
3044:
3043:
3042:
3039:
3035:
3031:
3027:
3023:
3020:
3019:
3018:
3017:
3013:
3009:
3005:
2998:
2995:
2991:
2987:
2983:
2982:
2975:
2970:
2967:
2963:
2959:
2941:
2938:
2934:
2930:
2929:
2928:
2924:
2920:
2916:
2912:
2911:
2910:
2907:
2903:
2899:
2898:
2895:
2894:
2893:
2890:
2885:
2884:
2882:
2881:
2880:
2877:
2873:
2862:
2858:
2854:
2844:
2840:
2835:
2825:
2821:
2817:
2814:
2803:
2802:
2801:
2797:
2793:
2792:KillingsBjorn
2786:
2781:
2780:
2778:
2774:
2770:
2766:
2762:
2755:
2754:
2753:
2749:
2745:
2744:KillingsBjorn
2738:
2733:
2732:
2731:
2727:
2723:
2718:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2712:
2705:
2701:
2697:
2692:
2691:
2690:
2689:
2685:
2681:
2680:KillingsBjorn
2663:
2659:
2655:
2651:
2650:
2649:
2646:
2641:
2640:
2639:
2635:
2631:
2627:
2626:
2625:
2621:
2617:
2613:
2612:
2611:
2607:
2603:
2598:
2597:
2596:
2593:
2589:
2588:
2587:
2586:
2582:
2578:
2572:
2571:
2567:
2563:
2562:KillingsBjorn
2551:
2547:
2543:
2538:
2537:
2536:
2533:
2529:
2525:
2524:
2523:
2519:
2515:
2510:
2509:
2508:
2507:
2503:
2497:
2491:
2478:
2474:
2469:
2466:
2461:
2457:
2453:
2452:
2446:
2445:
2444:
2443:
2439:
2435:
2425:
2420:
2417:
2412:
2407:
2403:
2399:
2398:
2397:
2394:
2390:
2386:
2382:
2378:
2374:
2370:
2362:
2357:
2354:
2349:
2344:
2340:
2339:
2338:
2335:
2333:
2327:
2326:
2318:
2314:
2310:
2306:
2305:
2300:
2298:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2285:
2282:
2277:
2274:
2271:
2266:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2255:
2253:
2245:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2236:
2234:
2228:
2227:
2217:
2212:
2211:
2206:
2202:
2198:
2193:
2191:
2187:
2183:
2166:
2161:
2158:
2153:
2149:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2137:
2135:
2127:
2123:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2113:
2110:
2105:
2101:
2097:
2093:
2089:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2080:
2076:
2074:
2067:
2061:
2056:
2053:
2048:
2043:
2042:
2041:
2038:
2036:
2030:
2029:
2021:
2017:
2013:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2002:
1999:
1994:
1989:
1985:
1981:
1979:
1977:
1973:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1964:
1962:
1956:
1955:
1947:
1943:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1890:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1876:
1872:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1861:
1858:
1853:
1850:
1847:
1843:
1840:
1836:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1823:primary topic
1819:
1816:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1782:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1771:
1769:
1763:
1762:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1743:for the term
1742:
1741:primary topic
1738:
1734:
1730:
1729:the page move
1726:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1709:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1696:
1689:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1678:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1592:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1544:
1542:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1521:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1473:
1469:
1464:
1463:
1459:
1458:
1452:
1448:
1447:
1426:
1421:
1419:
1411:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1394:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1380:
1378:
1370:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1347:about OtoBoku
1344:
1343:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1318:
1316:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1282:
1280:
1272:
1268:
1262:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1229:
1220:
1217:
1216:
1213:
1210:
1206:
1205:
1189:
1185:
1179:
1176:
1175:
1172:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1146:
1138:
1132:
1127:
1125:
1122:
1118:
1117:
1113:
1107:
1104:
1101:
1097:
1084:
1080:
1074:
1071:
1070:
1067:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1037:
1029:
1023:
1018:
1016:
1013:
1009:
1008:
1004:
998:
995:
992:
988:
965:
961:
959:
955:
953:
950:
948:
947:
942:
939:
937:
936:
931:
929:
925:
923:
922:
917:
915:
911:
909:
908:
903:
901:
898:
896:
895:
890:
888:
884:
882:
881:
876:
874:
870:
866:
862:
861:
860:Holy Virility
856:
853:
851:
850:
845:
842:
840:
839:
834:
831:
829:
828:
823:
820:
818:
817:
812:
810:
806:
804:
803:
798:
795:
793:
792:
787:
785:
781:
779:
778:
773:
770:
768:
767:
762:
760:
756:
754:
753:
748:
745:
743:
742:
737:
735:
731:
727:
725:
724:
719:
718:
715:
711:
707:
706:
703:
702:
698:
697:
693:
689:
685:
679:
676:
675:
672:
655:
650:
646:
645:
640:
637:
633:
632:
628:
622:
619:
616:
612:
599:
595:
589:
586:
585:
582:
565:
561:
557:
556:
548:
542:
537:
535:
532:
528:
527:
523:
517:
514:
511:
507:
488:
487:
483:
481:into English.
480:
476:
475:
470:
467:
466:
461:
458:
457:
453:
450:
449:
445:
442:
441:
436:
434:
433:
428:
426:
421:
420:
416:
415:
410:
408:
407:
401:
400:
394:
393:
388:
383:
380:
379:
378:
371:
370:
366:
363:
362:
358:
357:
353:
346:
343:
341:
338:
336:
333:
331:
328:
327:
325:
324:
320:
319:
315:
311:
307:
301:
298:
297:
294:
277:
274:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
238:
233:
232:
224:
213:
211:
208:
204:
203:
199:
193:
190:
187:
183:
171:
167:LGBT articles
154:
150:
146:
142:
141:
140:
131:
120:
118:
115:
111:
110:
106:
103:
100:
97:
93:
88:
84:
78:
70:
66:
61:
60:
52:
48:
46:
40:
36:
34:
30:
29:controversial
25:
18:
17:
5205:
5173:日本語はわかりますか？
5140:
5100:
5096:
5092:
5088:
5084:
5080:
5076:
5025:SlySneakyFox
5021:
4997:"Otokonoko".
4946:SlySneakyFox
4912:SlySneakyFox
4896:
4883:SlySneakyFox
4868:
4864:
4860:
4787:SlySneakyFox
4755:SlySneakyFox
4730:SlySneakyFox
4707:SlySneakyFox
4683:SlySneakyFox
4653:SlySneakyFox
4620:SlySneakyFox
4600:
4576:SlySneakyFox
4532:SlySneakyFox
4499:
4486:SlySneakyFox
4454:SlySneakyFox
4434:
4394:SlySneakyFox
4388:
4352:SlySneakyFox
4346:
4321:
4308:SlySneakyFox
4302:
4264:SlySneakyFox
4259:
4236:
4230:
4216:SlySneakyFox
4174:SlySneakyFox
4144:WP:RSOPINION
4126:SlySneakyFox
4056:
4023:SlySneakyFox
3986:SlySneakyFox
3973:SlySneakyFox
3966:
3944:SlySneakyFox
3931:SlySneakyFox
3898:SlySneakyFox
3859:SlySneakyFox
3846:SlySneakyFox
3781:
3759:SlySneakyFox
3758:
3744:
3738:. Retrieved
3729:
3721:
3714:. Retrieved
3705:
3697:
3670:SlySneakyFox
3657:SlySneakyFox
3621:
3601:SlySneakyFox
3588:SlySneakyFox
3538:
3515:SlySneakyFox
3502:SlySneakyFox
3477:
3471:
3455:SlySneakyFox
3451:
3440:
3433:
3371:SlySneakyFox
3349:
3345:
3342:
3328:SlySneakyFox
3325:
3287:SlySneakyFox
3259:SlySneakyFox
3225:
3221:
3203:SlySneakyFox
3184:Referred to
3111:SlySneakyFox
3103:
3089:SlySneakyFox
3001:
2985:
2969:
2961:
2956:
2919:SlySneakyFox
2865:. Retrieved
2863:. 2020-02-03
2860:
2846:. Retrieved
2842:
2827:. Retrieved
2823:
2785:SlySneakyFox
2765:SlySneakyFox
2759:— Preceding
2737:SlySneakyFox
2722:SlySneakyFox
2708:
2696:SlySneakyFox
2676:
2654:SlySneakyFox
2630:SlySneakyFox
2602:SlySneakyFox
2573:
2558:
2542:SlySneakyFox
2527:
2514:SlySneakyFox
2482:
2479:Trap section
2455:
2450:
2430:
2405:
2401:
2388:
2384:
2380:
2346:sufficient.
2342:
2321:
2320:
2302:
2296:
2251:
2222:
2221:
2208:
2194:
2179:
2147:
2133:
2091:
2087:
2072:
2024:
2023:
1950:
1949:
1932:
1909:
1878:
1870:
1817:
1757:
1756:
1748:
1744:
1722:
1692:
1682:
1645:NakaNakaNoNo
1630:NakaNakaNoNo
1600:NakaNakaNoNo
1596:
1540:
1471:
1455:Response to
1454:
1417:
1376:
1314:
1278:
1233:
1183:
1143:
1078:
1034:
957:
956:
944:
943:
933:
932:
928:/translation
919:
918:
905:
904:
892:
891:
878:
877:
858:
847:
846:
836:
835:
825:
824:
814:
813:
800:
799:
789:
788:
775:
774:
764:
763:
750:
749:
739:
738:
721:
720:
683:
654:project page
642:
593:
553:
484:
472:
463:
462:Create some
454:
446:
438:
430:
425:Vinland Saga
424:
417:
404:
397:
390:
389:
381:
367:
359:
305:
267:
247:project page
235:
229:
223:Japan portal
158:LGBT studies
149:project page
137:
136:
130:LGBTQ portal
102:LGBT studies
83:WikiProjects
42:
26:
4046:) has made
3996:) has made
3969:transphobic
3954:) has made
3869:) has made
3680:) has made
3611:) has made
3525:) has made
3383:Amended. -
3064:AngusW🐶🐶F
3032:(raised at
3008:DaysonZhang
2986:translation
2488:AngusW🐶🐶F
2456:otoko-no-ko
2434:Trappy-chan
2389:Japan Times
2264:wheelhouse.
1988:WP:ASTONISH
940:edit to see
843:edit to see
832:edit to see
821:edit to see
796:edit to see
771:edit to see
752:Collaborate
746:edit to see
699:To-do list:
649:WikiProject
427:(TV series)
361:Peer review
243:participate
73:Start-class
5233:Categories
5189:NekoKatsun
5102:all ears.
4668:NekoKatsun
4635:NekoKatsun
4604:NekoKatsun
4553:NekoKatsun
4509:NekoKatsun
4468:NekoKatsun
4438:NekoKatsun
4082:NekoKatsun
4008:NekoKatsun
3883:NekoKatsun
3824:NekoKatsun
3786:NekoKatsun
3740:2021-08-06
3698:References
3626:NekoKatsun
3565:NekoKatsun
3483:NekoKatsun
3478:apparently
3436:NekoKatsun
3395:apposition
3365:NekoKatsun
3346:The second
3273:NekoKatsun
3232:. p. 702.
3054:hikikomori
3026:WP:NOTBLUE
2962:References
2904:mostly. -
2867:2021-03-17
2848:2021-03-17
2829:2021-03-17
2324:Newslinger
2313:#otokonoko
2252:Sandstein
2244:Newslinger
2225:Newslinger
2134:Sandstein
2027:Newslinger
1953:Newslinger
1873:refers to
1835:WP:PRECISE
1781:Newslinger
1760:Newslinger
1541:Sandstein
1418:Sandstein
1377:Sandstein
1315:Sandstein
1279:Sandstein
952:Riot grrrl
827:Notability
253:, and see
153:discussion
5123:Sandtalon
3537:Okay, so
3348:source do
2532:Alexandra
2460:Hijiri 88
2411:Hijiri 88
2348:Hijiri 88
2276:Hijiri 88
2216:RSP entry
2152:Hijiri 88
2148:otokonoko
2126:Otokonoko
2104:Hijiri 88
2073:otokonoko
2047:Hijiri 88
1993:Hijiri 88
1933:otokonoko
1921:Otokonoko
1910:otokonoko
1904:, with a
1902:Otokonoko
1879:otokonoko
1871:otokonoko
1852:Hijiri 88
1839:Otokonoko
1818:Otokonoko
1753:Otokonoko
1749:Otokonoko
1745:Otokonoko
1733:Otokonoko
1714:Otokonoko
1159:Sociology
1150:sociology
1106:Sociology
921:Translate
474:translate
51:citations
5187:そう、分かった。
5063:contribs
5041:contribs
5013:contribs
4935:contribs
4865:a person
4505:WP:UNDUE
4379:contribs
4338:contribs
4293:contribs
4249:contribs
4205:contribs
4156:contribs
4111:contribs
4070:contribs
4044:contribs
4036:username
3994:contribs
3952:contribs
3867:contribs
3809:contribs
3771:contribs
3746:society.
3716:4 August
3678:contribs
3609:contribs
3523:contribs
3441:SoraNews
2773:contribs
2761:unsigned
2122:Hijiri88
2098:single "
1755:page? —
1725:Hijiri88
1476:{{ping}}
1369:WP:SYNTH
1329:Koi Kaze
766:Copyedit
647:. This
399:Pictures
392:Articles
49:Include
5001:WP:BLUE
4571:WP:PUSH
4549:WP:PUSH
3547:PopDust
3543:WP:BLUE
3498:WP:BLUE
3474:WP:BLUE
3022:WP:BLUE
3004:WP:BLUE
2990:Engrish
2016:gallery
1975:sources
1906:hatnote
1885:or for
1240:Yuricon
1186:on the
1081:on the
849:Orphans
802:Infobox
741:Cleanup
686:on the
596:on the
409:: None
402:: None
395:: None
335:history
308:on the
272:Refresh
33:dispute
5221:(talk)
5159:Drmies
4895:Oh is
4193:WP:RSN
4166:WP:UGC
4140:WP:UGC
4121:WP:USG
3842:WP:SYN
3476:, but
3468:"Trap"
3299:No. -
3186:WP:RSN
3161:WP:RSN
3034:WP:RSN
3030:WP:DUE
2385:Kotaku
2343:Kotaku
2304:Kotaku
2100:Ano Ko
1984:GBooks
1271:WP:NOR
946:Verify
935:Update
791:Expand
723:Assess
486:Assess
372:: None
364:: None
79:scale.
4902:Ryk72
4873:Ryk72
4769:Ryk72
4745:Ryk72
4721:Ryk72
4697:Ryk72
4187:find.
3622:first
3549:? Or
3445:Ryk72
3385:Ryk72
3354:Ryk72
3314:Ryk72
3301:Ryk72
3249:Ryk72
3194:Ryk72
3177:Ryk72
3152:Ryk72
3148:list.
3077:sniff
3058:gyaru
3046:Ryk72
3038:Ryk72
2994:Ryk72
2937:Ryk72
2915:WP:RS
2906:Ryk72
2902:WP:RS
2889:Ryk72
2876:Ryk72
2711:Ryk72
2645:Ryk72
2592:Ryk72
2501:sniff
2400:I am
2393:Ryk72
2301:from
2293:Does
2207:from
2190:WP:IG
2180:I've
2079:Ryk72
1972:GNews
1731:from
1480:WP:OR
1410:WP:3O
1230:Okazu
1045:manga
1041:anime
907:Stubs
894:Split
880:Photo
816:Merge
471:Help
406:Lists
345:purge
340:watch
281:Japan
263:Reiwa
237:Japan
192:Japan
145:LGBTQ
5193:nyaa
5179:talk
5163:talk
5148:talk
5127:talk
5108:talk
5059:talk
5037:talk
5009:talk
4950:talk
4931:talk
4916:talk
4897:that
4887:talk
4861:trap
4791:talk
4759:talk
4734:talk
4711:talk
4687:talk
4672:nyaa
4657:talk
4639:nyaa
4624:talk
4608:nyaa
4580:talk
4557:nyaa
4536:talk
4526:and
4513:nyaa
4490:talk
4472:nyaa
4458:talk
4442:nyaa
4398:talk
4375:talk
4356:talk
4334:talk
4312:talk
4289:talk
4268:talk
4245:talk
4220:talk
4201:talk
4178:talk
4152:talk
4130:talk
4107:talk
4086:nyaa
4066:talk
4040:talk
4027:talk
4012:nyaa
3990:talk
3977:talk
3948:talk
3935:talk
3902:talk
3887:nyaa
3863:talk
3850:talk
3828:nyaa
3805:talk
3790:nyaa
3767:talk
3718:2021
3674:talk
3661:talk
3630:nyaa
3605:talk
3592:talk
3569:nyaa
3519:talk
3506:talk
3487:nyaa
3459:talk
3414:talk
3412:💿 (
3375:talk
3343:Both
3332:talk
3291:talk
3277:nyaa
3263:talk
3234:ISBN
3207:talk
3175:. -
3115:talk
3093:talk
3071:bark
3012:talk
2923:talk
2796:talk
2769:talk
2748:talk
2726:talk
2700:talk
2684:talk
2658:talk
2634:talk
2620:talk
2606:talk
2581:talk
2566:talk
2546:talk
2518:talk
2495:bark
2438:talk
2402:very
2375:and
2331:talk
2319:. —
2232:talk
2184:and
2092:mean
2034:talk
1960:talk
1810:and
1767:talk
1703:talk
1663:talk
1649:talk
1634:talk
1619:talk
1604:talk
1573:talk
1559:talk
1527:talk
1520:cast
1509:talk
1488:talk
1400:talk
1359:talk
1337:talk
1301:talk
1248:talk
1236:yuri
962:see
926:see
912:see
885:see
838:NPOV
807:see
782:see
757:see
732:and
728:see
437:Add
330:edit
5216:Fir
5213:een
5210:rgr
5207:Eve
5055:8ya
5033:8ya
5005:8ya
4927:8ya
4500:may
4498:It
4371:8ya
4330:8ya
4285:8ya
4241:8ya
4197:8ya
4148:8ya
4103:8ya
4062:8ya
3801:8ya
3782:but
3763:8ya
3539:you
3403:0xf
3056:or
2387:or
2012:Boy
1925:Boy
1914:Boy
1883:Boy
1875:Boy
1735:to
1723:Hi
1716:to
1697:. —
1178:Low
1073:Low
678:Low
588:Low
300:Low
265:6)
259:JST
5235::
5195:)
5181:)
5165:)
5150:)
5129:)
5110:)
5065:)
5061:•
5043:)
5039:•
5015:)
5011:•
4952:)
4937:)
4933:•
4918:)
4889:)
4869:is
4793:)
4761:)
4736:)
4713:)
4689:)
4674:)
4659:)
4641:)
4626:)
4610:)
4582:)
4559:)
4538:)
4515:)
4492:)
4474:)
4460:)
4444:)
4400:)
4381:)
4377:•
4358:)
4340:)
4336:•
4314:)
4295:)
4291:•
4270:)
4251:)
4247:•
4222:)
4207:)
4203:•
4180:)
4158:)
4154:•
4132:)
4113:)
4109:•
4088:)
4072:)
4068:•
4042:•
4034:—
4029:)
4014:)
3992:•
3984:—
3979:)
3950:•
3942:—
3937:)
3904:)
3889:)
3865:•
3857:—
3852:)
3830:)
3811:)
3807:•
3792:)
3773:)
3769:•
3743:.
3720:.
3676:•
3668:—
3663:)
3632:)
3607:•
3599:—
3594:)
3571:)
3521:•
3513:—
3508:)
3489:)
3461:)
3416:)
3377:)
3350:es
3334:)
3293:)
3279:)
3265:)
3228:.
3209:)
3117:)
3095:)
3080:)
3074:•
3014:)
2925:)
2859:.
2841:.
2822:.
2798:)
2775:)
2771:•
2750:)
2728:)
2702:)
2686:)
2660:)
2636:)
2622:)
2608:)
2583:)
2568:)
2548:)
2520:)
2504:)
2498:•
2471:)
2468:やや
2440:)
2422:)
2419:やや
2359:)
2356:やや
2287:)
2284:やや
2163:)
2160:やや
2115:)
2112:やや
2088:ko
2058:)
2055:やや
2004:)
2001:やや
1948:—
1939:).
1927:,
1889:?
1863:)
1860:やや
1802:,
1705:)
1665:)
1651:)
1636:)
1621:)
1606:)
1575:)
1561:)
1529:)
1511:)
1490:)
1460::
1412:.
1402:)
1361:)
1339:)
1303:)
1273:.
1250:)
1043:,
871:·
867:·
863:·
857:·
429:,
422::
384:–
261:,
5191:(
5177:(
5161:(
5146:(
5125:(
5106:(
5057:(
5035:(
5027::
5023:@
5007:(
4948:(
4929:(
4914:(
4885:(
4789:(
4757:(
4732:(
4709:(
4685:(
4670:(
4655:(
4637:(
4622:(
4606:(
4578:(
4555:(
4534:(
4511:(
4488:(
4470:(
4456:(
4440:(
4396:(
4373:(
4354:(
4332:(
4310:(
4287:(
4266:(
4243:(
4218:(
4199:(
4176:(
4150:(
4128:(
4105:(
4084:(
4064:(
4038:(
4025:(
4010:(
3988:(
3975:(
3946:(
3933:(
3900:(
3885:(
3861:(
3848:(
3826:(
3803:(
3788:(
3765:(
3672:(
3659:(
3628:(
3603:(
3590:(
3567:(
3517:(
3504:(
3485:(
3457:(
3409:8
3407:e
3405:8
3373:(
3367::
3363:@
3330:(
3289:(
3275:(
3261:(
3241:.
3205:(
3113:(
3091:(
3068:(
3010:(
2921:(
2870:.
2851:.
2832:.
2794:(
2787::
2783:@
2767:(
2746:(
2739::
2735:@
2724:(
2698:(
2682:(
2656:(
2632:(
2618:(
2604:(
2579:(
2564:(
2544:(
2516:(
2492:(
2465:聖
2462:(
2436:(
2416:聖
2413:(
2353:聖
2350:(
2299:"
2281:聖
2278:(
2218:)
2214:(
2157:聖
2154:(
2109:聖
2106:(
2052:聖
2049:(
1998:聖
1995:(
1946:
1857:聖
1854:(
1783::
1779:@
1701:(
1661:(
1647:(
1632:(
1617:(
1602:(
1571:(
1557:(
1525:(
1507:(
1486:(
1398:(
1357:(
1335:(
1299:(
1263::
1259:@
1246:(
1190:.
1085:.
960::
949::
938::
924::
910::
897::
883::
852::
841::
830::
819::
805::
794::
780::
769::
755::
744::
726::
690:.
600:.
468:.
312:.
276:)
268:(
155:.
85::
47:.
35:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
