1563:. I do not doubt that your edits are in good faith, but I would mention that the "other users" you refer to have simply made homophobic slurs, some of which have now been edited out but are present in the edit history. I do not suggest in any way that you are the source of the homophobic slurs. My edits about the international table and the SCOTUS decision are simply matters of fact which balance what is otherwise an overly positive-looking article on LGBT in the US. Progress over the period you mention is important, but so is the recent trend in the US to reverse some of the progress; as is the gap between the US as a world-leader and its relatively modest status in respect of LGBT rights. In process terms, I reverted your edit on the basis of WP:BRD and the correct procedure is for a discussion to take place here. Instead, you have reverted my revert without discussion. We are both relatively new editors, I see, so I think the best thing is to take advice. In my opinion, your action might amount to edit warring (I might be wrong and I will defer to more experienced editors). I do not wish to accuse you unfairly and so rather than go to that process or any other of the dispute resolution processes I will do what I think is the lowest rung and ask for a third opinion. This has now been done
1254:
clear how the reference justifies the statement. The second is to a table of most LGBT friendly countries where the US is listed at 26. That puts it just a little above the midpoint of the . Even if you include hybrid regimes the US comes in the second quartile. In other words, the 'most advanced' claim does not seem to be true. The second claim which doesn't look right is that "public opinion is overwhelmingly supportive of same sex marriages". I don't want to break the rules on WP:OR, but there's plenty of sources available through Google which show that while same sex marriage is strongly supported by educated white people of the centre and left, the picture with most other groups is far less supportive. I will wait to see if there are any other comments before editing.
861:
1846:
1318:. That is far from "overwhelming support", particularly given the resistance which still exists amongst many communities and groups. In the second case, the trends in this 2017 Pew survey are relevant (the figures can be reasonably assumed to be a little better today along the lines suggested in the diagrams) make it clear that there is not likely to yet be near universal support across society amongst adults aged to 34. Near universal is, in any case, a very strong claim and requires more than an unclear link to a single source.
758:
731:
1012:
994:
1210:
699:
768:
358:
322:
623:
596:
914:
893:
924:
633:
1105:
1060:
528:
507:
435:
417:
445:
1458:
1295:
the main body ('Public opinion on different LGBT rights') and also see my comments above. I also think that the article could be improved in a number of other ways. It seems very long and does not include much about recent reversals; I find the content and structure a bit odd in that latter respect. I will not make more changes until I see that the ones I've made already are not objected to.
207:
1724:
280:
237:
386:
1632:. Happy to discuss the article here once we have a third opinion, or perhaps another route, to help decide which version should stand while we discuss. For info, in my opinion at present the lead (for an article which is far too long) reads like 'how well the US has done since the 1980s' rather than as an introduction to a WP:NPOV article about LGBT in the US.
1542:
United States, same-sex marriage and same-sex adoption are legal nationwide, and polls consistently show that around 70% of the
American population is in favor. There is also national protection for LGBT people in labor matters. Of course, not everything is perfect, but the vision you try to impose is clearly desproportionate, biased and ill-intentioned.
1134:
1821:
I'm not actually gay, but I do recognise your comment as the kind of thing small town guys in the US say when they're desperate for a dick up their ass but don't feel that fits well with their self-image. My advice to you is, be honest with yourself; you'll enjoy life much more in the end. Good luck
1354:
Hi, and thanks for your comment. I don't know why you think my comment is silly. My point is simply that the US is listed at the referece given in the article at no.26 in the world's most advanced LGBT countries; that's not a sufficient bases for a claim that
America is "one of the most advanced" in
1609:
And I reverted your edition, because you reverted the stable edition of the article, which has been there for a very long time. When you want to undo the stable edition of a article and make significant changes, you are the one who must first start a discussion to create consensus. The consensus is
1294:
My first edit removed the first sentence reference to the US being amongst the most advanced countries in respect of LGBT rights (see my comments above). My second edit removed the last paragraph which referred to high levels of support for LGBT rights in the US. That was contradicted by content in
1601:
Recent controversies over LGBT issues in US politics have focused primarily on transgender issues, which is mentioned in the article introduction. It is clearly mentioned that transgender issues have a mixed treatment. And this is not something exclusive to the United States, since in recent years
1313:
The two references used to justify "overwhelming support" for gay marriage in the US are first to
Grinnel College, then a link simply to the search page of a General Society Survey which it is claimed contains (somewhere, it is not clear) a statement that there is "near universal" support for same
1541:
Their editions have a clear intention to show the United States in the worst possible light regarding LGBT rights. As the stable edition of the article indicates, the United States has made significant progress on LGBT rights since 1980, a fact too important that its editions want to hide. In the
1253:
The lead seems to make two un-evidenced claims, both of which look questionable on their face. First, the claim in the first line that the US is one of the most advanced countries on the world in respect of LGBT rights is supported by two references. The first is to a book where it is not at all
1742:
pushes a POV too strongly for the lede, while I also agree that the status quo lede unnecessarily frames the topic in terms of 'progress since the 1980s'. I think a better lede would attempt to describe the current state in very high-level terms, and at the end note recent changes and areas of
1597:
None of these fundamental and essential things have been reversed, therefore there is no reason big enough and solid enough to place at the beginning of the article that the United States is a backward country, in decline and with low acceptance of LGBT people, so start the article that way is
1525:
Both sections are surely entirely and very relevant to the article? In what way are they controversial? They are simply facts, there is nothing contested about them. I have reverted on the basis of BRD and begin the discussion here.Do any other editors have an opinion? Thank you in advance.
1404:
I have edited the start of the introductory section to note that the US comes below most full democracies in the relevant index of the social acceptability of LGBTQIA+. I have also edited to include SCOTUS 2023 ruling permitting limited discrimination against LGBTQIA+ people.
1321:
It is important that this article not appear to be making overly optimistic claims about the advance of LGBT rights in the US. Things are certainly heading in the right direction, but claims of overwhelming and near universal support appear unhelpful and incorrect.
1654:. It is very helpful. I am not sure, tbh, whether the previous version s/he refers to is yours or mine. To err on the side of caution, I'm going to leave it at yours while I work on an improved lead. I'll propose it here to see what you, and maybe others, think.
1470:
1743:
activism and reaction. In the meantime, I recommend keeping the previous (again, disagreeable to me) status quo, as this is a relatively high-activity article, so it more plausibly represents a consensus. Note that unfortunately LGBT rights are a
1309:
One of my edits has been reverted. I just thought I'd put this here to see if other editors agree with the revert. As described above, I removed the final paragraph of the lead because it seems obviously incorrect and is supported by poor
153:
1605:
Regarding the
Supreme Court ruling that you mention, in the article there is already a section about Supreme Court rulings on LGBT issues, and the ruling you refer to is mentioned there. Therefore, the article is properly
2012:
1581:
It is precisely your edits that unbalance the article. Progress in the United States regarding LGBT rights is not simply important, it is the most important and the most relevant fact to highlight. In United
1613:
My conclusion on this topic is that the positive aspects of LGBT rights in the United States outweigh the negative aspects, therefore it is the positive aspects that should be named and highlighted first.
1602:
far-right groups and radical conservatives that promote attacks and hate speech against LGBT people (especially transgender people), have been growing throughout the world, including developed countries.
1545:
Besides me, there are other users who have also expressed their disagreement with you. Do not undo the stable edition of the article again without reaching a consensus, otherwise you could be blocked.
1508:"The United States is listed below almost all full democracies (except Taiwan, Japan, South Korea and Costa Rica) in the UCLA Williams Institute world index of social acceptance of LBGTQIA+ people (
1355:
respect of LGBT issues. I have also cited a reference that in the US support for LGBT equality runs at a bit better than 2-1; again, that's not "overwhelming". You haven't cited a single source.
1370:
1972:
1341:
1982:
875:
147:
44:
1421:
1071:
1291:. I have gone ahead and made two edits. I made them separately so other editors can see them and revert individually if necessary. The second edit is a bold one as per WP:BRD, I think.
1987:
798:
1807:
1977:
1947:
815:
713:
198:
708:
606:
328:
194:
190:
1967:
841:
1952:
870:
851:
741:
1922:
578:
568:
1478:
1992:
1942:
1769:. I understand what you mean about both versions of the lead and your view looks wise and sensible. I will propose a new lead along the lines you suggest.
805:
257:. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them.
1927:
1912:
1115:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic.
79:
1937:
689:
679:
1747:, so extra caution is needed when editing. Drastically changing the lede in a CTOP article without prior consensus is usually asking for a revert.
810:
1962:
1902:
1518:"In 2023, the US Supreme Court ruled that providers of creative services could, given specified conditions, discriminate against LGBTQIA+ people.(
544:
473:
1070:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been
168:
1957:
1917:
244:
135:
85:
2002:
976:
966:
781:
736:
655:
1509:
1932:
1879:
793:
535:
512:
469:
459:
422:
1374:
2007:
1345:
304:
292:
24:
129:
1425:
1224:
300:
1022:
287:
260:
248:
99:
30:
1811:
125:
1907:
646:
601:
296:
104:
20:
1519:
1314:
sex marriage amongst adults age 18-34. These sources seem very much outliers. In the first case, a better source is Gallup,
1849:
This is the image that should be used for the header. It depicts a map of the contiguous United States with the pride flag.
789:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
1997:
1827:
1774:
1695:
1659:
1637:
1572:
1531:
1439:
1410:
1388:
1360:
1327:
1300:
1259:
336:
74:
1220:
175:
1383:
Why would you write such a homophobic thing? I think you might be feeling poorly. Maybe you should check with a doctor?
1118:
1112:
1090:
1067:
397:
366:
344:
1505:
The following text has been removed (along with references) from the lead on the basis that it is; "controversial".
1845:
65:
1086:
1018:
999:
371:
206:
185:
1216:
937:
898:
860:
217:
1823:
1770:
1739:
1691:
1669:
1655:
1633:
1568:
1527:
1435:
1406:
1384:
1356:
1323:
1296:
1270:
1255:
308:
141:
1340:
You are silly! 80% of
Americans support LGBT. Same-sex marriage is legal nationwide. f that's not advanced...
1729:
1564:
1188:
1166:
1159:
941:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
266:
109:
1883:
1173:
1078:
1089:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
1752:
1677:
403:
303:. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about
1857:
1490:
773:
1647:
1629:
1615:
1560:
1546:
1510:
https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Global-Acceptance-Index-LGBTI-Nov-2021.pdf
385:
1875:
1619:
1550:
1196:
1082:
340:
161:
55:
654:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
543:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1461:
This article was the subject of a Wiki
Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
1278:
332:
222:
70:
1887:
1861:
1831:
1815:
1800:
1778:
1756:
1699:
1681:
1663:
1641:
1623:
1576:
1554:
1535:
1494:
1443:
1429:
1414:
1392:
1378:
1364:
1349:
1331:
1304:
1282:
1263:
757:
730:
1738:
I don't think either lede is very suitable for this article. I agree that the one provided by @
1011:
993:
1796:
1195:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
254:
51:
221:
1786:
1766:
1748:
1687:
1673:
1651:
1315:
1146:
219:
698:
1869:
1853:
1486:
1474:
638:
1520:
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/jun/30/us-supreme-court-ruling-lgbtq-rights-colorado
468:-related issues on Knowledge. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
1744:
347:
exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
632:
622:
595:
1896:
1288:
1274:
1184:
786:
1591:- The Supreme Court banned employment discrimination against LGBT people nationwide.
1420:
TQI+ is bullshits that normal LGB people don't care about and is only to their harm
1104:
1059:
1792:
540:
450:
913:
892:
1273:
regime? I was expecting much lower results. Anyway, please remove that statement.
1457:
923:
434:
416:
1501:
US place on international index of countries for LGBT tolerance; Scotus ruling
929:
919:
763:
628:
527:
506:
440:
1672:
Yes, I was referring to the version opening with 'progress since the 1980s'
785:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
269:
when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
1180:
651:
1316:
which puts present overall support for gay marriage at a little over 2-1
1594:- There is a federal law that punishes hate crimes against LGBT people.
1154:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
1844:
465:
464:, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
1842:
I believe a sidebar (at the top of a page) would be very useful.
1172:] The anchor (#1969 law) is no longer available because it was
321:
1204:
1128:
1099:
1054:
942:
379:
352:
316:
274:
231:
223:
15:
1434:
The SCOTUS ruling is about gay people. You know that, right?
859:
697:
1077:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
2013:
Articles created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride 2015
1588:- Same-sex adoption was legalized throughout the country.
1585:- Same-sex marriage was legalized throughout the country.
339:. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If
1215:
On 26 April 2023, it was proposed that this article be
160:
650:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
539:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1973:C-Class United States articles of High-importance
1983:Mid-importance United States Government articles
1269:"where the US is listed at 26" That high, for a
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1650:. Do have a look at the 3O kindly provided by @
1610:not only put a comment on the discussion page.
370:. Please read recent comments and look in the
1988:WikiProject United States Government articles
335:while commenting or presenting evidence, and
174:
8:
1017:This article was created or improved during
1567:. I will also put this at your talk page.
988:
887:
725:
590:
501:
411:
1978:C-Class United States Government articles
1948:Low-importance American politics articles
1452:Wiki Education assignment: Senior Seminar
1242:Not sure how to do this, but maybe this?
1598:clearly unbalanced and disproportionate.
990:
889:
727:
592:
503:
413:
383:
1968:High-importance United States articles
1878:, because it's arbitrarly decorative.
1874:It is against the consensus to put an
1953:American politics task force articles
1806:US is gay friendly, fu*kin* fa**ots!
1371:2A01:5A8:307:BBFD:7569:5377:5B0E:6C18
7:
1923:Low-importance Human rights articles
1838:Should a navigation sidebar be used?
1342:2A01:5A8:306:6B93:C92F:A32:1304:99C2
935:This article is within the scope of
779:This article is within the scope of
644:This article is within the scope of
533:This article is within the scope of
1221:LGBTQI+ rights in the United States
1165:] The anchor (#By state) has been
1158:] The anchor (#By state) has been
945:and the subjects encompassed by it.
826:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
23:for discussing improvements to the
1993:WikiProject United States articles
1943:C-Class American politics articles
1466:
1462:
1422:2A01:5A8:307:BBFD:35C4:7AF:96F6:DE
829:Template:WikiProject United States
553:Knowledge:WikiProject Human rights
482:Knowledge:WikiProject LGBT studies
14:
1928:WikiProject Human rights articles
1913:WikiProject LGBT studies articles
1369:Chuck, fa*ot, i really hate you!
556:Template:WikiProject Human rights
485:Template:WikiProject LGBT studies
367:previous arguments being restated
305:LGBTQ rights in the United States
293:LGBTQ rights in the United States
25:LGBTQ rights in the United States
1938:Low-importance politics articles
1722:
1469:. Further details are available
1456:
1208:
1132:
1103:
1058:
1010:
992:
922:
912:
891:
766:
756:
729:
631:
621:
594:
526:
505:
443:
433:
415:
384:
356:
320:
278:
235:
205:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1765:Thank you very much for this, @
971:This article has been rated as
846:This article has been rated as
684:This article has been rated as
573:This article has been rated as
456:This article is of interest to
259:Content must be written from a
243:The subject of this article is
1963:C-Class United States articles
1903:Knowledge controversial topics
1888:06:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
1808:2A01:5A8:40D:D940:0:0:8BD:AE7B
1187:. The anchor (#Hermaphrodite)
1183:links to a specific web page:
1034:Template:Wiki Loves Pride talk
664:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
402:It is of interest to multiple
1:
1958:WikiProject Politics articles
1918:C-Class Human rights articles
1495:18:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
1485:— Assignment last updated by
1365:22:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
1091:contentious topics procedures
868:This article is supported by
706:This article is supported by
667:Template:WikiProject Politics
658:and see a list of open tasks.
547:and see a list of open tasks.
291:for general discussion about
42:Put new text under old text.
1783:I reverted it back for now,
1350:06:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
1332:08:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
1305:07:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
1283:01:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
1264:21:05, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
709:American politics task force
337:do not make personal attacks
2003:Low-importance law articles
1876:image in navigation sidebar
871:WikiProject U.S. Government
253:When updating the article,
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
2029:
1757:23:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
1642:07:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
1624:21:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
1577:18:08, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
1555:11:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
1536:07:22, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
1444:21:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
1430:19:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
1415:10:39, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
1393:09:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
1379:06:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
1031:Knowledge:Wiki Loves Pride
977:project's importance scale
852:project's importance scale
690:project's importance scale
579:project's importance scale
1933:C-Class politics articles
1862:18:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
1832:20:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
1816:16:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
1779:07:08, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
1700:22:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
1682:22:01, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
1664:21:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
1093:before editing this page.
1037:Wiki Loves Pride articles
1005:
970:
951:Knowledge:WikiProject Law
907:
867:
845:
782:WikiProject United States
751:
705:
683:
616:
572:
521:
428:
410:
363:Discussions on this page
255:be bold, but not reckless
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
2008:WikiProject Law articles
1801:14:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
1271:Christian fundamentalist
1087:normal editorial process
954:Template:WikiProject Law
787:United States of America
536:WikiProject Human rights
460:WikiProject LGBT studies
1074:as a contentious topic.
1850:
1181:Intersex#Hermaphrodite
1167:deleted by other users
1160:deleted by other users
1083:standards of behaviour
864:
832:United States articles
702:
392:This article is rated
247:and content may be in
75:avoid personal attacks
1908:C-Class LGBT articles
1848:
1822:with it all, anyway.
1730:third opinion request
1473:. Student editor(s):
863:
701:
559:Human rights articles
472:or contribute to the
261:neutral point of view
199:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
1998:C-Class law articles
1079:purpose of Knowledge
774:United States portal
647:WikiProject Politics
295:. Any such comments
105:No original research
1824:Charlie Campbell 28
1771:Charlie Campbell 28
1740:Charlie Campbell 28
1692:Charlie Campbell 28
1670:Charlie Campbell 28
1656:Charlie Campbell 28
1634:Charlie Campbell 28
1569:Charlie Campbell 28
1528:Charlie Campbell 28
1436:Charlie Campbell 28
1407:Charlie Campbell 28
1385:Charlie Campbell 28
1357:Charlie Campbell 28
1324:Charlie Campbell 28
1297:Charlie Campbell 28
1256:Charlie Campbell 28
1121:and edit carefully.
1117:Please consult the
800:Articles Requested!
1851:
1471:on the course page
1113:contentious topics
1068:contentious topics
865:
703:
398:content assessment
374:before commenting.
369:
290:
86:dispute resolution
47:
1762:
1761:
1745:contentious topic
1235:
1234:
1203:
1202:
1174:deleted by a user
1149:in most browsers.
1125:
1124:
1098:
1097:
1053:
1052:
1049:
1048:
1045:
1044:
987:
986:
983:
982:
886:
885:
882:
881:
724:
723:
720:
719:
670:politics articles
589:
588:
585:
584:
500:
499:
496:
495:
378:
377:
364:
351:
350:
315:
314:
286:
273:
272:
230:
229:
66:Assume good faith
43:
2020:
1873:
1790:
1726:
1725:
1719:
1718:
1497:
1479:article contribs
1468:
1464:
1460:
1223:. The result of
1212:
1211:
1205:
1197:Reporting errors
1189:has been deleted
1136:
1135:
1129:
1107:
1100:
1062:
1055:
1039:
1038:
1035:
1032:
1029:
1028:Wiki Loves Pride
1019:Wiki Loves Pride
1014:
1007:
1006:
1000:Wiki Loves Pride
996:
989:
959:
958:
955:
952:
949:
932:
927:
926:
916:
909:
908:
903:
895:
888:
834:
833:
830:
827:
824:
776:
771:
770:
769:
760:
753:
752:
747:
744:
733:
726:
672:
671:
668:
665:
662:
641:
636:
635:
625:
618:
617:
612:
609:
598:
591:
561:
560:
557:
554:
551:
530:
523:
522:
517:
509:
502:
490:
489:
486:
483:
480:
453:
448:
447:
446:
437:
430:
429:
419:
412:
395:
389:
388:
380:
360:
359:
353:
343:is not reached,
324:
323:
317:
282:
281:
275:
239:
238:
232:
224:
210:
209:
200:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
2028:
2027:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2019:
2018:
2017:
1893:
1892:
1867:
1840:
1784:
1723:
1686:Thanks again, @
1503:
1484:
1454:
1251:
1240:
1209:
1199:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1133:
1081:, any expected
1036:
1033:
1030:
1027:
1026:
956:
953:
950:
947:
946:
938:WikiProject Law
928:
921:
901:
848:High-importance
831:
828:
825:
822:
821:
820:
806:Become a Member
772:
767:
765:
746:High‑importance
745:
739:
669:
666:
663:
660:
659:
639:Politics portal
637:
630:
610:
604:
558:
555:
552:
549:
548:
515:
487:
484:
481:
478:
477:
449:
444:
442:
396:on Knowledge's
393:
357:
345:other solutions
279:
236:
226:
225:
220:
197:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
2026:
2024:
2016:
2015:
2010:
2005:
2000:
1995:
1990:
1985:
1980:
1975:
1970:
1965:
1960:
1955:
1950:
1945:
1940:
1935:
1930:
1925:
1920:
1915:
1910:
1905:
1895:
1894:
1891:
1890:
1839:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1804:
1803:
1781:
1760:
1759:
1735:
1734:
1717:
1716:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1592:
1589:
1586:
1583:
1543:
1502:
1499:
1463:9 January 2024
1453:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1319:
1311:
1292:
1250:
1249:Claims in lead
1247:
1245:
1239:
1236:
1233:
1232:
1225:the discussion
1213:
1201:
1200:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1177:
1170:
1163:
1147:case-sensitive
1141:
1140:
1139:
1137:
1123:
1122:
1108:
1096:
1095:
1063:
1051:
1050:
1047:
1046:
1043:
1042:
1040:
1015:
1003:
1002:
997:
985:
984:
981:
980:
973:Low-importance
969:
963:
962:
960:
934:
933:
917:
905:
904:
902:Low‑importance
896:
884:
883:
880:
879:
876:Mid-importance
866:
856:
855:
844:
838:
837:
835:
819:
818:
813:
808:
803:
796:
794:Template Usage
790:
778:
777:
761:
749:
748:
734:
722:
721:
718:
717:
714:Low-importance
704:
694:
693:
686:Low-importance
682:
676:
675:
673:
656:the discussion
643:
642:
626:
614:
613:
611:Low‑importance
599:
587:
586:
583:
582:
575:Low-importance
571:
565:
564:
562:
545:the discussion
531:
519:
518:
516:Low‑importance
510:
498:
497:
494:
493:
491:
455:
454:
438:
426:
425:
420:
408:
407:
401:
390:
376:
375:
365:often lead to
361:
349:
348:
325:
313:
312:
309:Reference desk
297:may be removed
283:
271:
270:
240:
228:
227:
218:
216:
215:
212:
211:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2025:
2014:
2011:
2009:
2006:
2004:
2001:
1999:
1996:
1994:
1991:
1989:
1986:
1984:
1981:
1979:
1976:
1974:
1971:
1969:
1966:
1964:
1961:
1959:
1956:
1954:
1951:
1949:
1946:
1944:
1941:
1939:
1936:
1934:
1931:
1929:
1926:
1924:
1921:
1919:
1916:
1914:
1911:
1909:
1906:
1904:
1901:
1900:
1898:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1877:
1871:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1847:
1843:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1788:
1782:
1780:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1763:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1741:
1737:
1736:
1733:
1731:
1721:
1720:
1715:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1653:
1649:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1593:
1590:
1587:
1584:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1523:
1521:
1516:
1513:
1511:
1506:
1500:
1498:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1482:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1459:
1451:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1320:
1317:
1312:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1293:
1290:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1248:
1246:
1243:
1237:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1207:
1206:
1198:
1190:
1186:
1185:Hermaphrodite
1182:
1178:
1175:
1171:
1168:
1164:
1161:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1148:
1144:
1138:
1131:
1130:
1127:
1120:
1116:
1114:
1109:
1106:
1102:
1101:
1094:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1075:
1073:
1069:
1064:
1061:
1057:
1056:
1041:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1013:
1009:
1008:
1004:
1001:
998:
995:
991:
978:
974:
968:
965:
964:
961:
944:
940:
939:
931:
925:
920:
918:
915:
911:
910:
906:
900:
897:
894:
890:
877:
874:(assessed as
873:
872:
862:
858:
857:
853:
849:
843:
840:
839:
836:
823:United States
817:
814:
812:
809:
807:
804:
802:
801:
797:
795:
792:
791:
788:
784:
783:
775:
764:
762:
759:
755:
754:
750:
743:
738:
737:United States
735:
732:
728:
715:
712:(assessed as
711:
710:
700:
696:
695:
691:
687:
681:
678:
677:
674:
657:
653:
649:
648:
640:
634:
629:
627:
624:
620:
619:
615:
608:
603:
600:
597:
593:
580:
576:
570:
567:
566:
563:
546:
542:
538:
537:
532:
529:
525:
524:
520:
514:
511:
508:
504:
492:
488:LGBT articles
475:
471:
467:
463:
462:
461:
452:
441:
439:
436:
432:
431:
427:
424:
421:
418:
414:
409:
405:
399:
391:
387:
382:
381:
373:
368:
362:
355:
354:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
319:
318:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
289:
285:This page is
284:
277:
276:
268:
264:
262:
256:
252:
250:
246:
245:controversial
241:
234:
233:
214:
213:
208:
204:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1880:213.132.76.9
1852:
1841:
1805:
1728:Response to
1727:
1524:
1517:
1514:
1507:
1504:
1483:
1467:10 June 2024
1455:
1403:
1252:
1244:
1241:
1228:
1153:
1145:Anchors are
1142:
1126:
1110:
1076:
1065:
972:
957:law articles
936:
869:
847:
811:Project Talk
799:
780:
707:
685:
645:
574:
550:Human rights
541:Human rights
534:
513:Human rights
479:LGBT studies
470:project page
458:
457:
451:LGBTQ portal
423:LGBT studies
404:WikiProjects
327:Please stay
258:
242:
202:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1787:StereoFolic
1767:StereoFolic
1749:StereoFolic
1688:StereoFolic
1674:StereoFolic
1652:StereoFolic
1310:references.
1238:Name change
943:legal field
288:not a forum
148:free images
31:not a forum
1897:Categories
1870:OMGShay 92
1854:OMGShay 92
1487:Koolkat822
1475:Koolkat822
1119:procedures
1072:designated
930:Law portal
742:Government
474:discussion
301:refactored
1648:Esterau16
1630:Esterau16
1616:Esterau16
1606:balanced.
1561:Esterau16
1547:Esterau16
1287:Thanks, @
1229:not moved
1179:] Anchor
1085:, or any
341:consensus
267:citations
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1289:Dimadick
1275:Dimadick
661:Politics
652:politics
607:American
602:Politics
372:archives
265:Include
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1793:KlayCax
1582:States:
1176:before.
1169:before.
1162:before.
975:on the
850:on the
688:on the
577:on the
394:C-class
307:at the
249:dispute
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
1515:and;
816:Alerts
400:scale.
203:7Â days
126:Google
1628:Hi, @
1559:Hi, @
1217:moved
466:LGBTQ
333:civil
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1884:talk
1858:talk
1828:talk
1812:talk
1797:talk
1775:talk
1753:talk
1696:talk
1678:talk
1660:talk
1638:talk
1620:talk
1573:talk
1565:here
1551:talk
1532:talk
1522:)".
1512:).
1491:talk
1465:and
1440:talk
1426:talk
1411:talk
1389:talk
1375:talk
1361:talk
1346:talk
1328:talk
1301:talk
1279:talk
1260:talk
1227:was
1143:Tip:
1111:The
1066:The
1023:2015
842:High
331:and
329:calm
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1481:).
1219:to
967:Low
948:Law
899:Law
680:Low
569:Low
299:or
176:TWL
1899::
1886:)
1860:)
1830:)
1814:)
1799:)
1791:.
1777:)
1755:)
1698:)
1690:!
1680:)
1662:)
1640:)
1622:)
1575:)
1553:)
1534:)
1493:)
1442:)
1428:)
1413:)
1391:)
1377:)
1363:)
1348:)
1330:)
1303:)
1281:)
1262:)
1021:,
878:).
740::
716:).
605::
201::
193:,
156:)
54:;
1882:(
1872::
1868:@
1856:(
1826:(
1810:(
1795:(
1789::
1785:@
1773:(
1751:(
1732::
1694:(
1676:(
1668:@
1658:(
1646:@
1636:(
1618:(
1571:(
1549:(
1530:(
1489:(
1477:(
1438:(
1424:(
1409:(
1387:(
1373:(
1359:(
1344:(
1326:(
1299:(
1277:(
1258:(
1231:.
1191:.
1025:.
979:.
854:.
692:.
581:.
476:.
406:.
311:.
263:.
251:.
195:2
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
