Knowledge

Talk:Locally constant sheaf

Source 📝

84: 74: 53: 22: 171:
by Tamás Szamuely. Sadly the proof in this book also assumes local connectedness, but this assumption appears to be unnecessary. The nlab pages on this topic also never put any assumption on the topological space. Does anyone know of a good source/reference with a proof that does not assume local
162:
I recently noticed during an Algebraic Topology lecture that the proof of the equivalence between the categories of covering spaces and locally constant sheaves of sets does not require the assumption of local connectedness. When I looked at the original reference for this, an exercise in
140: 167:
by Mac Lane and Moerdijk, it used a very weird definition of locally constant and the actual equivalence was never stated anywhere, so I added a reference to
200: 130: 195: 106: 97: 58: 33: 177: 21: 173: 39: 83: 105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89: 73: 52: 189: 181: 102: 79: 15: 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 158:Is the locally connected assumption necessary? 8: 47: 19: 49: 7: 169:Galois Groups and Fundamental Groups 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 201:Low-priority mathematics articles 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 82: 72: 51: 20: 196:Stub-Class mathematics articles 135:This article has been rated as 1: 165:Sheaves in Geometry and Logic 109:and see a list of open tasks. 217: 182:09:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC) 134: 67: 46: 141:project's priority scale 98:WikiProject Mathematics 28:This article is rated 121:mathematics articles 90:Mathematics portal 34:content assessment 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 208: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 216: 215: 211: 210: 209: 207: 206: 205: 186: 185: 172:connectedness? 160: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 214: 212: 204: 203: 198: 188: 187: 174:CodingDragon04 159: 156: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 213: 202: 199: 197: 194: 193: 191: 184: 183: 179: 175: 170: 166: 157: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 168: 164: 161: 137:Low-priority 136: 96: 62:Low‑priority 40:WikiProjects 112:Mathematics 103:mathematics 59:Mathematics 190:Categories 30:Stub-class 139:on the 36:scale. 178:talk 131:Low 192:: 180:) 176:( 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
Low
project's priority scale
CodingDragon04
talk
09:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Categories
Stub-Class mathematics articles
Low-priority mathematics articles

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.